Outpatient BEAM Using Daily Etoposide and Cytarabine with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma Is Feasible and Decreases Inpatient Length of Stay

Introduction: High dose therapy with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is the most common consolidation therapy for chemosensitive patients with relapsed/refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) in the US. Inpatient hospitalization is usually required due to the twice daily dosing of etoposide and cytarabine, and patients remain admitted until neutrophil recovery. Utilizing our outpatient transplant program, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of outpatient BEAM with AHCT using daily dosed etoposide and cytarabine to enhance the patient experience and improve inpatient resource utilization. Methods: We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients treated in the outpatient setting at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Patients were eligible for outpatient AHCT if they did not have a clinical indication for inpatient continuous monitoring. Patients received BEAM conditioning consisting of carmustine on day -6 (300mg/m2), etoposide daily from day -5 through day -2 (200mg/m2/dose), cytarabine daily from day -5 through day -2 (400mg/m2/dose), and melphalan on day -1 (140mg/m2). AHCT on day 0, pegfilgrastim on Day +1, and supportive care were performed as per standard of care and institutional guidelines. Patients were seen daily by an advanced practice provider and HCT attending. Notably, service guidelines were revised to include a delayed emesis prophylactic regimen of oral dexamethasone (2mg bid) and lorazepam (0.5mg TID) from D+1 through D+7, which was initiated after the first three patients were treated. Patients were transfused packed red blood cells (pRBC) for hemoglobin <7g/dl and platelets for <20K/mcl. Results: From October 2018 to July of 2019, 13 patients (Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=5), mantle cell lymphoma (n=4), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=2), T-cell lymphoma (n=2), and grey zone lymphoma (n=1)) were treated. The median age was 40 years (range 26-71), and the majority were male (69%). Median cell dose infused was 5.89 CD34+ cells/kg (range 2.53-10.66). Two patients received cell infusions over 2 days, and three patients received washed cell infusion products. Two patients completed transplant entirely outpatient; the remainder required hospitalization during their transplant course. Reasons for admission included neutropenic fever (n=4), nausea (n=2), tachycardia (n=2), hypoxia (n=1), and other (n=2). Patients were admitted on a median of Day +6 (range Day+1 - Day+11) and remained inpatient for a median of 4 days (range 3-14). Eight patients (62%) returned to the outpatient stem cell transplant clinic for management prior to day 30. One patient was re-hospitalized prior to day 30. The median number of hospital days saved was 13 days/per patient. In total, 170 hospital days were saved with this regimen. Engraftment and toxicities were similar to inpatient administration. Neutrophil engraftment occurred at a median of Day+9 (range 8-11) with a median of 6 days of ANC<500 (IQR 8-11). Platelets comprised most of the transfusion support required, with a median of 4 platelet (range 2-8) and 2 pRBC (range 0-2) transfusions per patient. Grade 2 or higher diarrhea occurred for a median of 3.5 days (range 3-11) with 38% not having any diarrhea. A small percentage of patients required additional antiemetics outside the standard of care (23%). The median weight lost per patient was 2.5kg (range 0 - 10.3kg). Patients received intravenous fluid support with a median of 5 normal saline boluses (range 1-10). All patients maintained normal serum creatinine peri-transplant, with a median maximum serum creatinine of 0.9mg/dl (range 0.7-1.1). Six patients (46%) had engraftment syndrome. All patients were alive with a median follow-up of 91 days (range: 29-205). Conclusion: We found that BEAM followed by AHCT using daily dosed etoposide and cytarabine is feasible and safe for the outpatient setting with tolerability matching that of the traditional inpatient BEAM regimen. Moreover, this treatment method has the potential to reduce a considerable number of inpatient hospital days, while still safely maintaining a threshold for toxicity requiring inpatient admission. Disclosures Bhatt: Incyte: Consultancy. Landau:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Scordo:Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc.: Consultancy; McKinsey & Company: Consultancy. Sauter:Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding. Giralt:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Shah:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Prognostic Value of Cpss Cytogenetic Risk Classification in Patients with CMML after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115981 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2182-2182

Author(s):

Christian Koenecke ◽

Dirk-Jan Eikema ◽

Sheree Hazelaar ◽

Dietrich W. Beelen ◽

Victoria Potter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Allogeneic Hsct

Abstract Introduction: The only curative treatment approach for patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but disease relapse after transplantation is a major concern. Predictors for disease outcome after HSCT are limited. However, unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities have been shown to serve as predictors for relapse after transplantation. The aim of this large multicentric, international study was to retrospectively determine the impact of cytogenetic information according to the CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) on outcome after allogeneic HSCT. Patients and Methods: Patients were selected from the EBMT database who had received a first allogeneic HSCT for the treatment of CMML between 2000 and 2015. 268 centers participated into this study. In total, 1503 patients were included. Impact of CPSS-cytogenetic classification was analyzed regarding overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality after HSCT (gray test). Results: 488 female (32.5%) and 1013 male (67.5%) patients were included to the study. Median age at HSCT was 57.6 years (range 0.3-75.4). At time of HSCT, only 422 (28.1%) patients were in complete remission, whereas 1004 (66.8%) had active disease (77 missing). Matched related donor HSCT was performed in 35.7% of the patients, matched unrelated donor HSCT in 57.6%, mismatched related in 3.3% and mismatched unrelated in 3.4%. Bone marrow (12.6%), peripheral blood (84.3%), or both (0.3%) served as the stem cell graft. Cord blood was used as a graft in 2.8%. Myeloablative preparative regimens wereused in 223 patients (15.0%), and less intensive regimens were given to 1268 patients (85.0%). Median survival of patients included into this study was 52.2 months. 637 patients had sufficient cytogenetic information according to CPSS (866 missing), complete relapse information was available in 1385 patients. 143 patients could be categorized into CPSS-high, 85 in intermediate and 375 in low risk cytogenetics, respectively. In univariate analysis high risk CPSS cytogenetic information was found to be strongly associated with OS (low 38% (32-44%), intermediate 41% (30-53%), high 26% (18-34%)), and higher cumulative incidence of relapse (low 40% (35-46%), intermediate 42% (30-54%), high 48% (39-56%)), but not with non relapse mortality (low 28% (23-33%), intermediate 25% (16-35%), high 30% (22-38%)) at 60 months (Figure 1). Conclusion: In this international, multicentric analysis we show that CMML patients with high-risk cytogenetics had significantly worse OS after HSCT than patients with intermediate or low risk cytogenetics according to CPSS. New therapeutic strategies to prevent relapse after HSCT in CMML patients with high-risk cytogenetics are needed. Disclosures Koenecke: Amgen: Consultancy; abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Beelen:Medac: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support. Finke:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Neovii: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Research Funding; Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau. Chalandon:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel costs. Ganser:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kobbe:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Optimal Conditioning for Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Propensity Score Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123699 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 42-42 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Stefan O. Ciurea ◽

Ankur Varma ◽

Piyanuch Kongtim ◽

Samer Srour ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽

Older Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Secondary Aml

Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is increasingly performed for older patients with AML; however, the optimal conditioning regimen for these patients remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of 404 patients with AML, ≥60 years receiving AHSCT at our institution between 01/2005-08/2018 who received 4 conditioning regimens: 1) fludarabine+melphalan 100mg/m2 (FM100, N=78), 2) fludarabine+melphalan 140mg/m2 (FM140, N=89), 3) fludarabine+IV busulfan x 4 days with Bu AUC≥5,000/day (equivalent dose 130mg/m2/day) (Bu≥5,000, N=131), 4) fludarabine+IV busulfan x 4 days with Bu AUC 4,000/day (equivalent dose 110mg/m2/day) (Bu4,000, N=106). To adjust for potential selection bias in choices of conditioning regimen, propensity score was calculated and used as a stratifying variable in a multivariable Cox regression model. Factors included in the propensity score calculation were age, secondary AML, ELN2017 genetic risk, remission status before transplant, induction failure, donor type, stem cell source and KPS. Results are presented for the FM100, FM140, Bu≥5,000 and Bu4000, respectively. Median follow-up survivors were 40, 74, 30 and 44 months, respectively (p=0.06). Donors are matched sibling, matched unrelated, haploidentical and mismatched unrelated donor in 126 (31%), 218 (54%), 40 (10%) and 20 (5%) patients, respectively. Patients in the FM100 group were significantly older and had lower KPS. The median age was 67, 64, 64 and 65 years, respectively (p=0.001), while 51%, 32%, 27% and 27% had KPS<90%, respectively (p<0.001). The HCT-CI of ≥3 was present in 57%, 62%, 56% and 70%, respectively (p=0.33), while 42%, 78%, 47% and 51% had high and very high-risk DRI, respectively (p<0.001), and 12%, 46%, 18% and 32% of the patients were transplanted in active disease (p<0.001). No significant differences were seen in both cytogenetic and ELN2017 genetic risk. More patients in FM100 group were treated using a standard of care protocol (73%, 64%, 25% and 31%, respectively, p<0.001). Grade 2-4 aGVHD at day 100 were 26% vs. 26%, 36% and 40% (p=0.04), and extensive cGVHD at 3 years 14% vs. 42%, 36% and 37%, respectively (p=0.07). The NRM at 3 years were 19%, 29%, 25% and 21% (p=0.06), and 3-year relapse rates were 32% vs. 32%, 30% and 55%, respectively (p=0.003). Among 4 groups, FM100 group had a significantly better PFS and GRFS with 5-year PFS for these 4 groups were 44%, 30%, 33% and 22% (p=0.02) and 5-year GRFS were 28%, 20%, 18% and 9% (p=0.006), respectively (Figure 1). For subgroup of patients with KPS <90%, 5-year PFS were 41%, 27%, 28%, 22%, respectively (p=0.007), while there was no significant difference between 4 conditioning groups in patients with high-risk AML defined as either secondary AML, induction failure or high-risk cytogenetics/high ELN2017 risk, suggesting that a more intense conditioning is not beneficial in this group of patients. The survival benefit of FM100 persisted after adjusted for baseline factors, transplant characteristics as well as propensity scores in a multivariable analysis (MVA). In MVA for PFS, HR was 0.57 (p=0.013) for FM100, 0.68 (p=0.056) for FM140 and 0.77 (p=0.137) for Bu> 5000 as compared with Bu 4,000 group (Figure 1). In the MVA for GRFS, HR for FM100, FM140 and Bu> 5000 was 0.53 (p=0.005), 0.78 (p=0.196), and 0.81 (p=0.178), respectively as compared with Bu 4,000 group. Other factors that independently predicted PFS were secondary AML (HR 1.68, p=0.001), remission status before transplant (HR 1.82, p=0.048 for CR with MRD positive, HR 1.87, p=0.043 for CR with unknown MRD status and HR 2.86, p=0.001 for active disease at transplant as compared with CR with MRD negative), KPS (HR 0.98, p=0.005) and use of a mismatched unrelated donor (HR 2.46, p=0.001 compared with matched related donor transplant). Conclusions: Older patients with AML benefit from a reduced-intensity conditioning with FM100 conditioning regimen, which was associated with better survival despite the fact that patients who could not receive more intense conditioning preferentially received this regimen. Higher intensity conditioning does not appear to improve survival in older patients. Alternative approaches to increase in conditioning intensity are needed to improve survival in patients with AML receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Disclosures Ciurea: Kiadis Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: stock holder; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bashir:Imbrium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acrotech: Research Funding; StemLine: Research Funding; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Oran:Astex pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AROG pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Popat:Bayer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Ablynx: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kisoji: Consultancy, Honoraria; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffman La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Patients with Immunoglobulin Light-Chain Amyloidosis with t(11;14) Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141307 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 18-19

Author(s):

Aimaz Afrough ◽

Leonard C Alsfeld ◽

Samer A. Srour ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

Neeraj Saini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Single Center ◽

Research Support ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Free Survival

Background- In patients with light chain amyloidosis (AL), t(11;14) detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the most common cytogenetic aberration. Several studies have shown that t(11;14) is associated with inferior outcomes in newly diagnosed AL patients [1, 2]. In contrast, at least one study in patients with t(11;14) who underwent high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) showed improved complete response (CR) rate and prolonged hematologic event-free survival[3]. In this single-center, retrospective analysis, we evaluated the outcome of patients with AL and t(11;14) who underwent auto-HCT at our institution. Method- We identified 122 consecutive patients with AL with cardiac or renal involvement who received an auto-HCT between 2011 and 2019. Baseline FISH data were available for 92 patients, 15 (16 %) of whom had t(11;14). Seventy-seven (84%) patients without t(11;14) were included as control . Hematologic and organ responses were evaluated according to the Consensus Guidelines for AL [4]. Revised Mayo staging system was utilized for Cardiac staging [5]. Result- The median age at auto-HCT was 60 years (range, 27 to 77). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups (Table 1). The median follow-up from auto-HCT was 28 months (range, 1 to 100). Overall, 40%, and 42% of patients with or without t(11;14), respectively (p=0.573), received post-auto-HCT maintenance therapy. One-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 2%. The 1-year NRM was 0 and 2.6% (n=2) in patients with or without t(11;14) (p=0.366). Hematologic CR after auto-HCT was seen in 7 (47%) and 33 (42%) patients with or without t(11;14), respectively (p=0.78). Organ response (OR) after auto-HCT was seen in 10 (71%) and 50 (67%) patients with or without t(11;14), respectively (p=0.586). The 2-year hematologic disease-free survival (Heme DFS) was 93% and 87% with or without t(11;14), respectively (p=0.422). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 92%, and 87% in patients with or without t(11;14) (p=0.6) (Figure 1A).The 2-year overall survival was 100%, ad 87% in patients with or without t(11;14) (p=0.2) (Figure 1B). Cardiac involvement with AL was associated with a shorter OS (p=0.012). Conclusion- In this single-center retrospective analysis, we showed that auto-HCT is safe and feasible in selected patients with AL and t(11;14), and these patients have comparable outcomes to patients without t(11;14). Disclosures Bashir: Celgene: Research Funding; StemLine: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; KITE: Other: Advisory Board; Purdue: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board. Hosing:NKARTA Inc.: Consultancy. Popat:Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kebriaei:Amgen: Other: Research Support; Pfizer: Other: Served on advisory board; Kite: Other: Served on advisory board; Novartis: Other: Served on advisory board; Ziopharm: Other: Research Support; Jazz: Consultancy. Shpall:Takeda: Other: Licensing Agreement; Magenta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptimmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Zelluna: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Manasanch:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Sanofi: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; JW Pharma: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Quest Diagnostics: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria. Lee:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy. Kaufman:Janssen: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Patel:Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nektar: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Thomas:Ascentage: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; X4 Pharma: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Other: Advisory Boards; Genentech: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Orlowski:STATinMED Research: Consultancy; Founder of Asylia Therapeutics, Inc., with associated patents and an equity interest, though this technology does not bear on the current submission.: Current equity holder in private company, Patents & Royalties; Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, EcoR1 Capital LLC, Forma Therapeutics, Genzyme, GSK Biologicals, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Biotech, Juno Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Legend Biotech USA, Molecular Partners, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Laboratory research funding from BioTheryX, and clinical research funding from CARsgen Therapeutics, Celgene, Exelixis, Janssen Biotech, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding. Champlin:Actinium: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Takeda: Patents & Royalties; Cytonus: Consultancy; DKMS America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy. Qazilbash:Janssen: Research Funding; Bioline: Research Funding; Angiocrine: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Acceptable Toxicity and Good Hematological and Renal Responses after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma Patients with Renal Insufficiency at Transplant: A Prospective SFGM-TC Observational Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140713 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 38-39 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Laurent Garderet ◽

Hafida Ouldjeriouat ◽

Mohamed-Amine Bekadja ◽

Elisabeth Daguenet ◽

Laure Vincent ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Renal Function ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Number ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Cd34 Cells

Background: High dose melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is widely used in multiple myeloma (MM) patients as upfront and salvage therapy. However, the safety and efficacy of ASCT in patients with renal insufficiency (RI) is controversial, which have led to an inconsistent arbitrary cut-off for creatinine clearance (CrCl) for performing ASCT. Here we analyzed prospectively the outcomes of MM patients with severe RI who underwent ASCT. Methods: We enrolled prospectively 50 newly diagnosed MM patients who had a serum CrCl of <40 mL/min at the time of ASCT and an age of up to 65 years. They all received bortezomib-based induction therapy and had achieved at least a partial response before proceeding to ASCT. The recommended dose of melphalan was 140 mg/m2 and it was advised to infuse at least 3 x106/kg autologous CD34+ cells. Consolidation/maintenance post-ASCT was according to the physician's choice. The primary endpoint was transplant related mortality. Results: The patients characteristics at enrollment are given in Table 1. We focused on 44 patients who were beyond 3 months post-ASCT. Light chain MM was frequent (12%), 10% had high risk cytogenetics, 36% increased serum LDH and 10% extramedullary disease. Induction chemotherapies included bortezomib plus IMiDs in 25/44 patients with ≥2 lines of chemotherapy in 12/44. The pre-transplant disease status was sCR in =5%, CR in =15%, VGPR in =39%, and PR in =41% of patients. The number of days of cytapheresis was 2 or less in 95% of cases and the median number of CD34+ cells collected was 3.3 x 106 (1.3-9.5). The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 175 days (103-307). HDM was 140 mg/m2 in 42/44 patients and 200 mg/m2 in 2/44. All, except two, received consolidation post ASCT (34% missing) and 52% had maintenance therapy (all lenalidomide except two receiving bortezomib) and 7% had no maintenance (41% pending). Toxicity: We observed one death during the first 100 days post-ASCT, secondary to a septic shock on day 42. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 12 days (9-68) and to platelet engraftment 13 days (10-70). Among patients receiving RBC transfusions (75%) and platelet transfusions (84%), the median number of RBC transfusions was 3 (1-6) and that of platelet transfusions was 3 (1-10). Response: Nine patients (70%) achieved dialysis independence from the time of diagnosis: 13 patients were on dialysis at diagnosis, 5 at the time of ASCT and 4 three months post-ASCT. Renal function improved post-ASCT in 34% of patients, 14% moving from a CrCl of <40 mL/min to 60 mL/min and 20% to above 60 mL/min. No patient experienced worsened renal function following ASCT. At 100 days post-ASCT, the hematological response had improved in 49% of patients, from PR to VGPR (18%), from PR to CR/sCR (11%) and from VGPR to CR/sCR (20%). The best response obtained was 5% PR, 34% VGPR, 47% CR and 11% sCR with one patient relapsing. Conclusions: In this preliminary analysis, HDM with ASCT proved to be safe and effective in MM patients with RI at transplant. We observed one death among 44 patients within the first 3 months post-ASCT. A more detailed report of the toxicity will be presented during the meeting along with the survival. Disclosures Vincent: takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Congress support; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Congress support; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Congress support. Mohty:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Karlin:AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, personal fees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Other: Personal fees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, personal fees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, personal fees. Morel:Janssen: Honoraria. Rubio:Medac: Consultancy; Gilead: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Neovii: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Obesity-Induced Microbiome Alterations Result in Severe Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127743 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1922-1922

Author(s):

Lam T. Khuat ◽

Catherine T. Le ◽

Chien-Chun Pai ◽

Robin Shields-Cutler ◽

Shernan Holtan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Inflammatory Cytokine ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Graft Versus Host ◽

Endotoxin Translocation ◽

Fund Research

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains a viable treatment option for many cancers but its clinical utility is limited due to the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Understanding the impact of obesity on immune function has become increasingly important in the setting of the current obesity pandemic. We report here that obesity has a negative and selective impact on acute gut GVHD. Diet-induced obese (DIO) mice exhibited increased gut permeability, endotoxin translocation and radiation-induced gastrointestinal damage. After allo-HSCT, DIO recipients across strains and sex had markedly increased pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF), GVHD biomarker ST2, MHC class II expression and exhibited rapid mortality associated with severe acute gut pathology. This obesity-associated lethal acute gut GVHD was dependent on donor CD4 T cells and occurred even in minor MHC mismatch strain combination in which only a delayed skin chronic GVHD resulted in lean recipients. Pro-inflammatory cytokine blockade targeting both IL-6 and TNF ameliorated obesity-associated acute gut GVHD while maintaining graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effects. Microbiome assessment of DIO mice revealed markedly reduced microbiome diversity and decreased Clostridiaceae abundance. Additionally, DIO mice had a significant increase of GVHD-associated Akkermansia muciniphila before and after allo-HSCT compared to the controls. Extended antibiotic treatment of DIO mice protected from the endotoxin translocation, cytokine storm as well as gut GVHD pathology but did not protect later development of chronic skin GVHD. These results demonstrate that obesity alters the microbiome and imparts differential effects on GVHD following allo-HSCT with decreased survival and this inferior outcome can be pre-empted by combined pro-inflammatory cytokine blockade or antibiotic pretreatment. Disclosures Pai: Roche-Genentech: Employment. Holtan:CSL Behring: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Ferrara:ViraCor: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Kamada: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; Enlivex: Consultancy; Xenikos: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; National Institutes of Health: Research Funding. Levine:Novartis: Honoraria; Kamada: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Consultancy; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ironwood: Honoraria; Biogen: Other: non-financial support; Viracor: Patents & Royalties: biomarker patent. Abedi:Abbie: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Blazar:Kamon Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Five Prime Therapeutics Inc: Co-Founder, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta Therapeutics and BlueRock Therapeuetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fate Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; RXi Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.: Research Funding; Abbvie Inc: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Childrens' Cancer Research Fund: Research Funding; KidsFirst Fund: Research Funding; Tmunity: Other: Co-Founder; BlueRock Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Transformed Fanconi Anaemia Patients after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Analysis on Behalf of European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115399 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 646-646

Author(s):

Stefano Giardino ◽

Dirk-Jan Eikema ◽

Regis Peffault De Latour ◽

Yves Bertrand ◽

Mahmoud Aljurf ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Related Donor

Abstract INTRODUCTION Fanconi anemia (FA) is an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome that carries a high risk of transformation to myelodysplasia (MDS) and acute leukemia. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is used to treat FA patients in clonal evolution. The roles of chemotherapy before HSCT and the intensity of conditioning regimens in transformed FA patients are controversial, because of the high sensitivity of FA patients to DNA-damaging agents increases the risk of severe toxicities, the duration of aplasia, the risk of infective complications thus limiting the possibility to administer full dose cytoreductive treatments. The sequence chemotherapy-HSCT has been reported by some groups (MehtaPA et al Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007, Talbot A et al Haematologica 2014, Mitchell R et al Br J Haematol 2014, Ayas M et al J Clin Oncol 2013), but conclusive information is lacking because of small number of patients described without a risk factors' analysis. The aim of this retrospective study is to report the outcome of a large cohort of transformed FA who underwent allo-HSCT and to define the factors that may impact on its outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study was conducted on behalf of the Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAAWP) and Chronic Malignancies Working Parties (CMWP) of the EBMT and was based on data of patients who underwent allo-HSCT between 1999-2016 for transformed FA, defined as a diagnosis of FA in presence of any hematological malignancies or cytogenetic abnormalities, registered in the EBMT Data Base. Clinical and biological information of the disease and details on transplant procedures and outcome were collected by a specific form distributed to Centres participating in the study. RESULTS Data of 71 patients (35 males-36 females) affected by transformed FA (42 MDS, 25 AL, 4 with cytogenetic abnormalities but without blasts) undergoing allo-HSCT were collected from 25 Centres . A matched related donor (MRD) was used in 31% of cases, an unrelated donor (UD) in 56.3% and a mismatched related donor (MMRD) in 12.7%. Bone marrow was the main source of cells (54.3%) followed by cord blood (22.9%), peripheral blood (21.4%) and bone marrow plus peripheral blood (1.4%). The median age at allo-HSCT was 12.7 years (range 9.3-23.4). Thirty seven (52.1%) patients received a chemotherapy before HSCT. Pre-HSCT status of malignancy in available patients was complete remission (CR) in 24% (n = 12/50) and an active disease (no-CR) in 76 % patients (n = 38/50). The conditioning regimen included total body irradiation (TBI) in 37 (52.1%) (radiation dose: ≤ 4.0 Gy in 30; > 4.0 Gy in 7), busulphan (BUS) in 16 (22.6%), no-TBI nor BUS in 18 (25.3%). Median follow-up was 93.7 months (71-110.6). GvHD prophylaxis and transplants' details are summarized in Table 1. All patients engrafted. Median time for neutrophils was 17 days (14-23) and it was 25 days (23-42) for platelets. The 2-and 5-year overall survival (OS) probability were 54% (41-66%) and 45% (32-57%) respectively; the 2- and 5-year event-free survival (EFS) (events being death, relapse and graft loss) 52% (40-65%) and 45% (32-58%). The cumulative incidence of relapse were 15% (7-24%) and 21% (11-31%), , of non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 37% (25-49%) and 39% (27-51%) respectively at 2 and 5-year. Most frequent causes of death were GvHD (33.3%), infections (23.3%) and relapse of malignancy (16.7%). Patients transplanted in CR, (neither blasts, nor major dysplastic features) and from matched related donor had a significantly better outcome (5-year OS: CR 83% (62-100%) vs no-CR 36% (19-52%) [p 0.01], MRD 60% (37-83%) vs UD 47% (31-64%) vs MMRD 12% (0-35%) [p 0.03]; 5-year EFS: CR 83% (62-100%) vs no-CR 34% (17-51%) [p 0.01], MRD 61% (38-83%) vs UD 48% (31-64%) vs MMRD 12% (0-35%) [p 0.02]; 5-year NRM: CR 0% vs no-CR 44% (27-61%) [p 0.007]) vs those engrafted in no-CR and from no-MRD. (Fig 1 a, b, c). No other tested variable (therapy before transplant and conditioning regimen) significantly affected the outcome. CONCLUSION This study on large cohort of FA patients transplanted because of transformation shows that allo-HSCT from MRD has a better outcome and that CR from malignancy before transplant appears to be a major determinant for a favorable outcome. Disclosures Peffault De Latour: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Ganser:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Risitano:Pfizer Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amyndas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Rituximab Maintenance after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Prolongs Survival in Younger Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Randomized Phase 3 LyMa Trial of the Lysa/Goelams Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.145.145 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 145-145 ◽

Cited By ~ 29

Author(s):

Steven Le Gouill ◽

Catherine Thieblemont ◽

Lucie Oberic ◽

Anne Moreau ◽

Krimo Bouabdallah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Mantle Cell ◽

High Dose Cytarabine

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for approximately 6% of non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) in adults. MCL commonly responds to initial therapy but inevitably patients relapse and response duration decreases from one salvage therapy to the next. Indeed, there is an urgent need to control and/or eradicate residual MCL cells that are responsible for early and late relapses. Maintenance with Rituximab (RM) after R-CHOP has been shown to prolong OS in elderly MCL patients treated with R-CHOP (Kluin-Nelemans et al. NEJM). Induction with high-dose cytarabine followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) consolidation is standard of care for young patients but RM after ASCT has never been investigated so far. The LyMa trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00921414) is a prospective international randomized phase III trial that investigated RM after ASCT in young previously untreated MCL patients. Patients were included at diagnosis (<66y; stage >I, untreated, diagnosis of MCL according to WHO 2008 classification). Induction immuno-chemotherapy consisted of 4 courses of R-DHAP every 21 days (Rituximab, Dexamethasone, High-dose cytarabine, salt Platinum) followed by ASCT consolidation. Patients who were not in response (CR/CRu or PR) after R-DHAP received 4 additional courses of R-CHOP-14 before ASCT. The conditioning regimen for ASCT was R-BEAM. Patients in response after ASCT were randomized (1:1) between RM or no RM. RM consisted of one infusion of Rituximab (375mg/m2) every 2 months for 3 years. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) calculated from time of randomization; events were defined as disease progression, relapse, death, severe infection or allergy to Rituximab. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from time of diagnosis and time of randomization were secondary endpoints. The interim analysis showed a trend for a longer EFS and PFS in favor of RM arm. (Le Gouill et al, ASH 2014, abs 146). Herein, we present the results of the final analysis. RESULTS. Two hundred and ninety nine patients were enrolled from September 2008 to August 2012. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were as followed: median age of 57y (27-65), 79% of male, MIPI-low in 53.2%, MIPI-I in 27.4% and MIPI-H in 19.4%. After inclusion, 277 patients completed the 4 courses of R-DHAP. The CR/CRu rate after R-DHAP was 77.3% and ORR was 89.3%. Twenty patients received R-CHOP. In all, 257 patients (including 12 patients who received R-DHAP/R-CHOP) underwent ASCT. After ASCT, 240 patients were randomized (RM, n=120; no RM, n=120). Median follow-up (mFU) from inclusion and from randomization were 54.4m (52.7-59.2) and 50.2m (46.5-54.2), respectively. The mPFS and mOS from inclusion in an intention to treat analysis were not reached; the 4y-PFS and OS were 67.8% (95%CI, 62.1 to 72.8) and 78% (95%CI; 72.8 to 82.3), respectively. According to EFS definition, 47 (39.2%) patients had an event in the no RM versus 25 (20.8%) in the RM arm. The mEFS from randomization was not reached in both arms. The 4y-EFS was 61.4% (95%CI; 51.3 to 69.9) in the no RM arm vs 78.9% (95%CI; 69.6 to 85.6) in the RM arm (p=0.0012). The EFS duration was significantly superior in the RM arm with a 54.3% reduction in the risk of event (Hazard ratio (HR)= 0.457; 95%CI, 0.28 to 0.74; p=0.0016). The median PFS and OS from randomization were not reached in both arms. The 4y-PFS and OS from randomization were superior in the RM arm: 82.2% (95%CI; 73.2 to 88.4) vs 64.6% (95%CI; 54.6 to 73) (p=0.0005) and 88.7% (95%CI; 80.7 to 93.5) vs 81.4% (95%CI; 72.3 to 87.7)(p=0.0413). Patients in the RM arm had a 60% reduction of risk of progression (HR=0.4; 95%CI, 0.23 to 0.68; p=0.0007) and a 50% reduction of risk of death (HR=0.5; 95%CI, 0.25 to 0.98; p=0.0454). The per protocol analysis yielded similar results. In conclusion, The LyMa trial demonstrates for the first time that RM after ASCT prolongs EFS, PFS and OS. Thus, 4 courses of R-DHAP plus ASCT (without TBI) followed by RM maintenance (one infusion every 2 month for 3 years) is a new standard of care for young MCL patients. Disclosures Thieblemont: Gilead: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Ribrag:Pharmamar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Esai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NanoString: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ArgenX: Research Funding. Casasnovas:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Haioun:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hermine:Celgene: Research Funding; AB science: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Alexion: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Lower Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Counts and Yields at Subsequent Donations Is Influenced By a Shorter Inter-Donation Interval between the First and Subsequent Mobilizations

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123492 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1962-1962

Author(s):

Sandhya R. Panch ◽

Brent R. Logan ◽

Jennifer A. Sees ◽

Bipin N. Savani ◽

Nirali N. Shah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Time Interval ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Cd34 Cells

Introduction: Approximately 7% of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors are asked to donate a subsequent time to the same or different recipient. In a recent large CIBMTR study of second time donors, Stroncek et al. incidentally found that second peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections had lower total CD34+ cells, CD34+ cells per liter of whole blood processed, and CD34+ cells per kg donor weight. Based on smaller studies, the time between the two independent PBSC donations (inter-donation interval) as well as donor sex, race and baseline lymphocyte counts appear to influence CD34+ cell yields at subsequent donations. Our objective was to retrospectively evaluate factors contributory to CD34+ cell yields at subsequent PBSC donation amongst NMDP donors. Methods. The study population consisted of filgrastim (G-CSF) mobilized PBSC donors through the NMDP/CIBMTR between 2006 and 2017, with a subsequent donation of the same product. evaluated the impact of inter-donation interval, donor demographics (age, BMI, race, sex, G-CSF dose, year of procedure, need for central line) and changes in complete blood counts (CBC), on the CD34+ cell yields/liter (x106/L) of blood processed at second donation and pre-apheresis (Day 5) peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts/liter (x106/L) at second donation. Linear regression was used to model log cell yields as a function of donor and collection related variables, time between donations, and changes in baseline values from first to second donation. Stepwise model building, along with interactions among significant variables were assessed. The Pearson chi-square test or the Kruskal-Wallis test compared discrete variables or continuous variables, respectively. For multivariate analysis, a significance level of 0.01 was used due to the large number of variables considered. Results: Among 513 PBSC donors who subsequently donated a second PBSC product, clinically relevant decreases in values at the second donation were observed in pre-apheresis CD34+ cells (73.9 vs. 68.6; p=0.03), CD34+cells/L blood processed (32.2 vs. 30.1; p=0.06), and total final CD34+ cell count (x106) (608 vs. 556; p=0.02). Median time interval between first and second PBSC donations was 11.7 months (range: 0.3-128.1). Using the median pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts from donation 1 as the cut-off for high versus low mobilizers, we found that individuals who were likely to be high or low mobilizers at first donation were also likely to be high or low mobilizers at second donation, respectively (Table 1). This was independent of the inter-donation interval. In multivariate analyses, those with an inter-donation interval of >12 months, demonstrated higher CD34+cells/L blood processed compared to donors donating within a year (mean ratio 1.15, p<0.0001). Change in donor BMI was also a predictor for PBSC yields. If donor BMI decreased at second donation, so did the CD34+cells/L blood processed (0.74, p <0.0001). An average G-CSF dose above 960mcg was also associated with an increase in CD34+cells/L blood processed compared to donors who received less than 960mcg (1.04, p=0.005). (Table 2A). Pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cells on Day 5 of second donation were also affected by the inter-donation interval, with higher cell counts associated with a longer time interval (>12 months) between donations (1.23, p<0.0001). Further, independent of the inter-donation interval, GCSF doses greater than 960mcg per day associated with higher pre-apheresis CD34+ cells at second donation (1.26, p<0.0001); as was a higher baseline WBC count (>6.9) (1.3, p<0.0001) (Table 2B). Conclusions: In this large retrospective study of second time unrelated PBSC donors, a longer inter-donation interval was confirmed to be associated with better PBSC mobilization and collection. Given hematopoietic stem cell cycling times of 9-12 months in humans, where possible, repeat donors may be chosen based on these intervals to optimize PBSC yields. Changes in BMI are also to be considered while recruiting repeat donors. Some of these parameters may be improved marginally by increasing G-CSF dose within permissible limits. In most instances, however, sub-optimal mobilizers at first donation appear to donate suboptimal numbers of HSC at their subsequent donation. Disclosures Pulsipher: CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Bellicum: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Lecture; Jazz: Other: Education for employees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Honoraria. Shaw:Therakos: Other: Speaker Engagement.

Download Full-text

Plerixafor (Mozobil ®)Plus G-CSF Is Effective in Mobilizing Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Patients with Concurrent Thrombocytopenia Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3229.3229 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3229-3229 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ivana N Micallef ◽

Eric Jacobsen ◽

Paul Shaughnessy ◽

Sachin Marulkar ◽

Purvi Mody ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Low Platelet Count ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3229 Poster Board III-166 Introduction Low platelet count prior to mobilization is a significant predictive factor for mobilization failure in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD) undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (auto-HSCT; Hosing C, et al, Am J Hematol. 2009). The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of HSC mobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF in patients with concomitant thrombocytopenia undergoing auto-HSCT. Methods Patients who had failed successful HSC collection with any mobilization regimen were remobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF as part of a compassionate use program (CUP). Mobilization failure was defined as the inability to collect 2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg or inability to achieve a peripheral blood count of ≥10 CD34+ cells/μl without having undergone apheresis. As part of the CUP, G-CSF (10μg/kg) was administered subcutaneously (SC) every morning for 4 days. Plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC) was administered in the evening on Day 4, approximately 11 hours prior to the initiation of apheresis the following day. On Day 5, G-CSF was administered and apheresis was initiated. Plerixafor, G-CSF and apheresis were repeated daily until patients collected the minimum of 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for auto-HSCT. Patients in the CUP with available data on pre-mobilization platelet counts were included in this analysis. While patients with a platelet count <85 × 109/L were excluded from the CUP, some patients received waivers and were included in this analysis. Efficacy of remobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF was evaluated in patients with platelet counts ≤ 100 × 109/L or ≤ 150 × 109/L. Results Of the 833 patients in the plerixafor CUP database, pre-mobilization platelet counts were available for 219 patients (NHL=115, MM=66, HD=20 and other=18.). Of these, 92 patients (NHL=49, MM=25, HD=8 and other=10) had pre-mobilization platelet counts ≤ 150 × 109/L; the median platelet count was 115 × 109/L (range, 50-150). The median age was 60 years (range 20-76) and 60.4% of the patients were male. Fifty-nine patients (64.1%) collected ≥2 × 109 CD34+ cells/kg and 13 patients (14.1%) achieved ≥5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The median CD34+ cell yield was 2.56 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The proportion of patients proceeding to transplant was 68.5%. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days and 22 days, respectively. Similar results were obtained when efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF was evaluated in 29 patients with platelet counts ≤ 100 × 109/L (NHL=12, MM=10, HD=3 and other=4). The median platelet count in these patients was 83 × 109/L (range, 50-100). The median age was 59 years (range 23-73) and 60.4% of the patients were male. The minimal and optimal cell dose was achieved in 19(65.5%) and 3(10.3%) patients, respectively. The median CD34+ cell yield was 2.92 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The proportion of patients proceeding to transplant was 62.1%. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days and 23 days, respectively. Conclusions For patients mobilized with G-CSF alone or chemotherapy ±G-CSF, a low platelet count prior to mobilization is a significant predictor of mobilization failure. These data demonstrate that in patients with thrombocytopenia who have failed prior mobilization attempts, remobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF allows ∼65% of the patients to collect the minimal cell dose to proceed to transplantation. Thus, in patients predicted or proven to be poor mobilizers, addition of plerixafor may increase stem cell yields. Future studies should investigate the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF in front line mobilization in patients with low platelet counts prior to mobilization. Disclosures Micallef: Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Jacobsen:Genzyme Corporation: Research Funding. Shaughnessy:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mody:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. van Rhee:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Subsequent Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Belinostat-Treated Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (R/R PTCL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5438.5438 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5438-5438

Author(s):

Andrei R. Shustov ◽

Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali ◽

Gerald Wulf ◽

Pamela Hsu ◽

Mi Rim Choi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

T Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Cell Transplantation ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Background: PTCL is a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies associated with a poor prognosis for most subtypes. In the relapsed setting, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only potentially curative option for patients with PTCL. However, many patients are not able to achieve an adequate response to allow for HSCT. Belinostat (Beleodaq) is a potent pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor that was recently approved in the US for the treatment of patients with R/R PTCL. Approval was based on data from the pivotal Phase 2 BELIEF study that enrolled 129 patients with R/R PTCL (N = 120 evaluable), and demonstrated durable clinical benefit and tolerability. This analysis presents data for 12 of the enrolled patients (9 evaluable) who proceeded to HSCT following belinostat treatment. Methods: Patients with R/R PTCL received belinostat as a 1000 mg/m2IV infusion on Days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint of the study was Objective Response Rate (ORR; Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC). We present efficacy and safety data for the subset of 12 patients who subsequently went on to HSCT. Results: Among 12 patients who subsequently proceeded to HSCT, 4 went on to receive an autologous HSCT and 8 received an allogeneic HSCT; 8 patients (67%) were female and 4 (33%) were male, and the median age was 54.5 (range 31-71) years. The median number of prior anticancer therapies was 2 (range 1-8), including 3 patients with prior autologous HSCT. The median number of belinostat treatment cycles was 2.5 (range 1-14) compared to the median of 2.0 (range 1-8) in the overall study population. Most patients in this subgroup had PTCL-Not Otherwise Specified (58.3%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (16.7%), or anaplastic large cell lymphoma (16.7%); 41.7% of patients had Stage IV disease. Three of the 12 patients were not evaluable for response due to insufficient histological material for confirmation by central pathologic analysis. The IRC-confirmed ORR for the 9 evaluable patients was 33.3% vs 25.8% in the study overall, and included 2 CRs, 1 PR, 2 patients with stable disease (SD) and 3 patients with progressive disease (PD). Duration of Response after transplant ranged from 41-261 days for the 3 belinostat responders. At last study contact, 2 patients had died from cardiac events (unrelated to belinostat) and 10 remained alive, with Overall Survival (OS) ranging from 8-23+ months. Most adverse events (AEs) were Grade 1-2, with two treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs (neutropenia and prolonged QT interval); 3 serious AEs (arthralgia, lower limb fracture, and pyrexia) were reported in this subgroup. Conclusions: Belinostat was well tolerated in previously treated patients with R/R PTCL and enabled some patients to proceed to HSCT. Three patients responded and went on to HSCT following belinostat; the remaining patients had HSCT following SD (2), PD (4) or were not evaluable (3). OS was prolonged when compared to historical controls. Summary of Patients Treated with Belinostat Who Subsequently Went on to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Sorted by Subtype and Response Table 1PatientSubtype(Stage)Prior RegimensECOGPSBelinostat CyclesIRC ResponseOS(months)DoR(days) Evaluable Patients931-003^PTCL-NOS (IIIB)3114CR11.56261907-006PTCL-NOS (IIA)5 + auto SCT02SD13.93-907-007^PTCL-NOS (IVA)402SD12.09-907-005^PTCL-NOS (IIIA)202PD13.63-140-002PTCL-NOS (IVA)817PD17.64-914-006PTCL-NOS (IIIA)4 + auto SCT02NE13.73-245-001AITL (UNK)106PR19.9141221-003ALCL ALK– (IA)2 + auto SCT011CR20.4173907-001ALCL ALK– (IVA)204PD22.87- Non-Evaluable Patients*914-002PTCL-NOS (IVB)102PD7.75-147-002^AITL (IIIB)221NE9.43-147-001Hepatosplenic TCL (IVA)103NE10.22- AITL = angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma; ALCL = anaplastic large cell lymphoma; ALK = alkaline phosphatase; auto = autologous; CR = complete response; DoR = duration of response; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IRC = independent review committee; NE = not evaluable; NOS = not otherwise specified; OS = overall survival; PD = progressive disease; PR = partial response; PS = performance status; PTCL = peripheral T-cell lymphoma; SCT = stem cell transplantation; SD = stable disease; TCL = T-cell lymphoma *Lack of central pathologic confirmation resulted in exclusion from the evaluable population ^Autologous hematopoietic SCT Disclosures Al-Ali: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hsu:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Choi:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Allen:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Visser:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Horwitz:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Kiowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Jannsen: Consultancy.

Download Full-text