Acceptable Toxicity and Good Hematological and Renal Responses after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma Patients with Renal Insufficiency at Transplant: A Prospective SFGM-TC Observational Study

Background: High dose melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is widely used in multiple myeloma (MM) patients as upfront and salvage therapy. However, the safety and efficacy of ASCT in patients with renal insufficiency (RI) is controversial, which have led to an inconsistent arbitrary cut-off for creatinine clearance (CrCl) for performing ASCT. Here we analyzed prospectively the outcomes of MM patients with severe RI who underwent ASCT. Methods: We enrolled prospectively 50 newly diagnosed MM patients who had a serum CrCl of <40 mL/min at the time of ASCT and an age of up to 65 years. They all received bortezomib-based induction therapy and had achieved at least a partial response before proceeding to ASCT. The recommended dose of melphalan was 140 mg/m2 and it was advised to infuse at least 3 x106/kg autologous CD34+ cells. Consolidation/maintenance post-ASCT was according to the physician's choice. The primary endpoint was transplant related mortality. Results: The patients characteristics at enrollment are given in Table 1. We focused on 44 patients who were beyond 3 months post-ASCT. Light chain MM was frequent (12%), 10% had high risk cytogenetics, 36% increased serum LDH and 10% extramedullary disease. Induction chemotherapies included bortezomib plus IMiDs in 25/44 patients with ≥2 lines of chemotherapy in 12/44. The pre-transplant disease status was sCR in =5%, CR in =15%, VGPR in =39%, and PR in =41% of patients. The number of days of cytapheresis was 2 or less in 95% of cases and the median number of CD34+ cells collected was 3.3 x 106 (1.3-9.5). The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 175 days (103-307). HDM was 140 mg/m2 in 42/44 patients and 200 mg/m2 in 2/44. All, except two, received consolidation post ASCT (34% missing) and 52% had maintenance therapy (all lenalidomide except two receiving bortezomib) and 7% had no maintenance (41% pending). Toxicity: We observed one death during the first 100 days post-ASCT, secondary to a septic shock on day 42. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 12 days (9-68) and to platelet engraftment 13 days (10-70). Among patients receiving RBC transfusions (75%) and platelet transfusions (84%), the median number of RBC transfusions was 3 (1-6) and that of platelet transfusions was 3 (1-10). Response: Nine patients (70%) achieved dialysis independence from the time of diagnosis: 13 patients were on dialysis at diagnosis, 5 at the time of ASCT and 4 three months post-ASCT. Renal function improved post-ASCT in 34% of patients, 14% moving from a CrCl of <40 mL/min to 60 mL/min and 20% to above 60 mL/min. No patient experienced worsened renal function following ASCT. At 100 days post-ASCT, the hematological response had improved in 49% of patients, from PR to VGPR (18%), from PR to CR/sCR (11%) and from VGPR to CR/sCR (20%). The best response obtained was 5% PR, 34% VGPR, 47% CR and 11% sCR with one patient relapsing. Conclusions: In this preliminary analysis, HDM with ASCT proved to be safe and effective in MM patients with RI at transplant. We observed one death among 44 patients within the first 3 months post-ASCT. A more detailed report of the toxicity will be presented during the meeting along with the survival. Disclosures Vincent: takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Congress support; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Congress support; janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Congress support. Mohty:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Karlin:AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, personal fees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Other: Personal fees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, personal fees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, personal fees. Morel:Janssen: Honoraria. Rubio:Medac: Consultancy; Gilead: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Neovii: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Effect of Daratumumab-Containing Induction on CD34+ Hematopoietic Stem Cells before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150360 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2764-2764

Author(s):

Ondrej Venglar ◽

Tereza Sevcikova ◽

Anjana Anilkumar Sithara ◽

Veronika Kapustova ◽

Jan Vrana ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Platelet Recovery ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Fcm Analysis ◽

D 12

Abstract Introduction: Daratumumab (Dara) is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody representing a novel treatment agent for multiple myeloma (MM). Nonetheless, several studies have reported a Dara-related impairment of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization and post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) complications, including low yields of mobilized HSCs and delayed neutrophil engraftment. Impact of Dara on the mobilization process and HSCs remains poorly understood even though sufficient yields of CD34+ cells are necessary for a successful ASCT and subsequent patient recovery. Aims: To compare the effect of the Dara-containing (Dara-Bortezomib-Dexamethasone [D-VCd]) and conventional (Bortezomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone [VTd]) therapy on CD34+ HSCs. Methods: Transplant eligible MM patients were treated with D-VCd or VTd induction regimen followed by a cyclophosphamide + G-CSF mobilization and a high-dose melphalan D -1 before ASCT. Flow cytometry (FCM) screening of CD34+ subsets was performed in the bone marrow (BM) or apheresis product (AP) at three consecutive time points: 1) diagnostic BM (DG), 2) mobilization AP (MOB), 3) a day prior ASCT BM (D-1). Furthermore, RNA sequencing (RNAseq) of sorted CD34+ cells was performed on total RNA with ribo-depletion protocol in AP after the induction. D-VCd samples had lower RNA yields thus the D-VCd or VTd groups were processed as independent batches. Results: Clinical data revealed no significant differences in mobilization (p >0.050) likely due to a small cohort sizes (D-VCd n=5 vs VTd n=9), though a trend towards worse performance in D-VCd was observed. Median CD34+ cell yield was 3.08 vs 10.56 x 10 6/kg. Platelet recovery of >20x10 9/L was D+14 vs D+12 (range: 11-18 vs 10-16). Neutrophil recovery of >0.5x10 9/L was D+12 in both groups (range: 11-17 vs 11-12). In FCM analysis, DG (n=14), MOB D-VCd (n=5) vs VTd (n=9), D-1 D-VCd (n=7) vs VTd (n=15) were compared. CD34+ frequency (Fig. 1A) difference in MOB D-VCd vs VTd was insignificant (median: 1.15% vs 1.89%), whereas CD34+ fraction dropped in D-1 D-VCd (median: 0.52% vs 0.72%, p=0.027), albeit there was no significant reduction in D-1 D-VCd vs initial DG (median: 0.52% vs 0.45%). Differences in the distribution of certain HSC subsets were detected in the CD34+ pool (Fig. 1B-E). Frequency of multipotent progenitors (MPPs) (Fig. 1B) was increased in MOB D-VCd (median: 82.1% vs 66.2%, p=0.004). Frequency of lympho-myeloid-primed progenitor + granulocyte-monocyte progenitor (LMPP+GMP) (Fig. 1C) subset was reduced in D-VCd in both MOB (median: 1.7% vs 16.9%, p=0.042) and D-1 (median: 5.3% vs 14.0%; p=0.026). Erythro-myeloid progenitors (EMPs) (Fig. 1D) were reduced in MOB D-VCd (median: 10.7% vs 19.5%, p=0.042), while the frequency of EMPs increased in D-1 D-VCd (median: 20.8% vs 12.4%, p=0.045). No considerable differences were found in the expression of adhesion molecules CD44/HCAM or CD184/CXCR4. CD38 was strongly diminished in the whole D-VCd CD34+ fraction of MOB and D-1. To understand whether the differences in the mobilization efficacy after D-VCd induction were reflected in the expression profile of mobilized CD34+ cells, differential expression analysis was performed. Overall 133 significantly deregulated genes (p<0.05; log fold change >(-)1) between cohorts (D-VCd n=5 vs VTd n=5) were revealed (Fig. 2). Pathway analysis showed cellular response and localization as the most deregulated categories. The list of deregulated genes contained 25% of non-coding RNAs, some of which were linked to a protein localization in the cell (RN7SL1/2). The expression of adhesion molecules was inspected independently. Out of 59 HSC hallmark genes, only 8 were significantly altered in D-VCd. Interestingly, the main homing molecule CXCR4 seemed to be downregulated in D-VCd, while integrins A3 and B4 were upregulated. Conclusions: Despite the limited cohort sizes, a prospective trend of delayed neutrophil and platelet recovery was observed after D-VCd therapy. FCM analysis revealed a significant reduction of CD34+ subsets responsible, among others, for a reconstitution of neutrophils and megakaryocytes. A strong signal in transcriptome data which would potentially explain differential mobilization in D-VCd cohort was not detected, nevertheless, several genes with adhesive/homing and stem cell differentiation function were indeed altered. The results warrant further investigation. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hajek: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharma MAR: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Lower Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Counts and Yields at Subsequent Donations Is Influenced By a Shorter Inter-Donation Interval between the First and Subsequent Mobilizations

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123492 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1962-1962

Author(s):

Sandhya R. Panch ◽

Brent R. Logan ◽

Jennifer A. Sees ◽

Bipin N. Savani ◽

Nirali N. Shah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Time Interval ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Cd34 Cells

Introduction: Approximately 7% of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors are asked to donate a subsequent time to the same or different recipient. In a recent large CIBMTR study of second time donors, Stroncek et al. incidentally found that second peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections had lower total CD34+ cells, CD34+ cells per liter of whole blood processed, and CD34+ cells per kg donor weight. Based on smaller studies, the time between the two independent PBSC donations (inter-donation interval) as well as donor sex, race and baseline lymphocyte counts appear to influence CD34+ cell yields at subsequent donations. Our objective was to retrospectively evaluate factors contributory to CD34+ cell yields at subsequent PBSC donation amongst NMDP donors. Methods. The study population consisted of filgrastim (G-CSF) mobilized PBSC donors through the NMDP/CIBMTR between 2006 and 2017, with a subsequent donation of the same product. evaluated the impact of inter-donation interval, donor demographics (age, BMI, race, sex, G-CSF dose, year of procedure, need for central line) and changes in complete blood counts (CBC), on the CD34+ cell yields/liter (x106/L) of blood processed at second donation and pre-apheresis (Day 5) peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts/liter (x106/L) at second donation. Linear regression was used to model log cell yields as a function of donor and collection related variables, time between donations, and changes in baseline values from first to second donation. Stepwise model building, along with interactions among significant variables were assessed. The Pearson chi-square test or the Kruskal-Wallis test compared discrete variables or continuous variables, respectively. For multivariate analysis, a significance level of 0.01 was used due to the large number of variables considered. Results: Among 513 PBSC donors who subsequently donated a second PBSC product, clinically relevant decreases in values at the second donation were observed in pre-apheresis CD34+ cells (73.9 vs. 68.6; p=0.03), CD34+cells/L blood processed (32.2 vs. 30.1; p=0.06), and total final CD34+ cell count (x106) (608 vs. 556; p=0.02). Median time interval between first and second PBSC donations was 11.7 months (range: 0.3-128.1). Using the median pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts from donation 1 as the cut-off for high versus low mobilizers, we found that individuals who were likely to be high or low mobilizers at first donation were also likely to be high or low mobilizers at second donation, respectively (Table 1). This was independent of the inter-donation interval. In multivariate analyses, those with an inter-donation interval of >12 months, demonstrated higher CD34+cells/L blood processed compared to donors donating within a year (mean ratio 1.15, p<0.0001). Change in donor BMI was also a predictor for PBSC yields. If donor BMI decreased at second donation, so did the CD34+cells/L blood processed (0.74, p <0.0001). An average G-CSF dose above 960mcg was also associated with an increase in CD34+cells/L blood processed compared to donors who received less than 960mcg (1.04, p=0.005). (Table 2A). Pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34+ cells on Day 5 of second donation were also affected by the inter-donation interval, with higher cell counts associated with a longer time interval (>12 months) between donations (1.23, p<0.0001). Further, independent of the inter-donation interval, GCSF doses greater than 960mcg per day associated with higher pre-apheresis CD34+ cells at second donation (1.26, p<0.0001); as was a higher baseline WBC count (>6.9) (1.3, p<0.0001) (Table 2B). Conclusions: In this large retrospective study of second time unrelated PBSC donors, a longer inter-donation interval was confirmed to be associated with better PBSC mobilization and collection. Given hematopoietic stem cell cycling times of 9-12 months in humans, where possible, repeat donors may be chosen based on these intervals to optimize PBSC yields. Changes in BMI are also to be considered while recruiting repeat donors. Some of these parameters may be improved marginally by increasing G-CSF dose within permissible limits. In most instances, however, sub-optimal mobilizers at first donation appear to donate suboptimal numbers of HSC at their subsequent donation. Disclosures Pulsipher: CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Bellicum: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: Lecture; Jazz: Other: Education for employees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Honoraria. Shaw:Therakos: Other: Speaker Engagement.

Download Full-text

Plerixafor (Mozobil ®)Plus G-CSF Is Effective in Mobilizing Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Patients with Concurrent Thrombocytopenia Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3229.3229 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3229-3229 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ivana N Micallef ◽

Eric Jacobsen ◽

Paul Shaughnessy ◽

Sachin Marulkar ◽

Purvi Mody ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Platelet Counts ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Low Platelet Count ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3229 Poster Board III-166 Introduction Low platelet count prior to mobilization is a significant predictive factor for mobilization failure in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD) undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (auto-HSCT; Hosing C, et al, Am J Hematol. 2009). The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of HSC mobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF in patients with concomitant thrombocytopenia undergoing auto-HSCT. Methods Patients who had failed successful HSC collection with any mobilization regimen were remobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF as part of a compassionate use program (CUP). Mobilization failure was defined as the inability to collect 2 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg or inability to achieve a peripheral blood count of ≥10 CD34+ cells/μl without having undergone apheresis. As part of the CUP, G-CSF (10μg/kg) was administered subcutaneously (SC) every morning for 4 days. Plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC) was administered in the evening on Day 4, approximately 11 hours prior to the initiation of apheresis the following day. On Day 5, G-CSF was administered and apheresis was initiated. Plerixafor, G-CSF and apheresis were repeated daily until patients collected the minimum of 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for auto-HSCT. Patients in the CUP with available data on pre-mobilization platelet counts were included in this analysis. While patients with a platelet count <85 × 109/L were excluded from the CUP, some patients received waivers and were included in this analysis. Efficacy of remobilization with plerixafor + G-CSF was evaluated in patients with platelet counts ≤ 100 × 109/L or ≤ 150 × 109/L. Results Of the 833 patients in the plerixafor CUP database, pre-mobilization platelet counts were available for 219 patients (NHL=115, MM=66, HD=20 and other=18.). Of these, 92 patients (NHL=49, MM=25, HD=8 and other=10) had pre-mobilization platelet counts ≤ 150 × 109/L; the median platelet count was 115 × 109/L (range, 50-150). The median age was 60 years (range 20-76) and 60.4% of the patients were male. Fifty-nine patients (64.1%) collected ≥2 × 109 CD34+ cells/kg and 13 patients (14.1%) achieved ≥5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The median CD34+ cell yield was 2.56 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The proportion of patients proceeding to transplant was 68.5%. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days and 22 days, respectively. Similar results were obtained when efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF was evaluated in 29 patients with platelet counts ≤ 100 × 109/L (NHL=12, MM=10, HD=3 and other=4). The median platelet count in these patients was 83 × 109/L (range, 50-100). The median age was 59 years (range 23-73) and 60.4% of the patients were male. The minimal and optimal cell dose was achieved in 19(65.5%) and 3(10.3%) patients, respectively. The median CD34+ cell yield was 2.92 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The proportion of patients proceeding to transplant was 62.1%. The median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days and 23 days, respectively. Conclusions For patients mobilized with G-CSF alone or chemotherapy ±G-CSF, a low platelet count prior to mobilization is a significant predictor of mobilization failure. These data demonstrate that in patients with thrombocytopenia who have failed prior mobilization attempts, remobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF allows ∼65% of the patients to collect the minimal cell dose to proceed to transplantation. Thus, in patients predicted or proven to be poor mobilizers, addition of plerixafor may increase stem cell yields. Future studies should investigate the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF in front line mobilization in patients with low platelet counts prior to mobilization. Disclosures Micallef: Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Jacobsen:Genzyme Corporation: Research Funding. Shaughnessy:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mody:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. van Rhee:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Comparison of Chemotherapy + G-CSF Versus Plerixafor (Mozobil®) + G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization In Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with Lenalidomide

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2258.2258 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2258-2258

Author(s):

Tomer M Mark ◽

Adriana C Rossi ◽

Roger N Pearse ◽

Morton Coleman ◽

David Bernstein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Yield ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Abstract 2258 Background: Prior use of lenalidomide beyond 6 cycles of therapy in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has been shown to negatively impact stem cell yield, but this phenomenon can be overcome with the addition of high-dose cyclophosphamide to standard G-CSF mobilization. We hypothesized that the use of plerixafor (Mozobil®) would compare similarly to chemotherapy in rescuing the ability to collect stem cells in lenalidomide-treated myeloma. Methods: We performed a retrospective study comparing the efficacy of plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization (PG) to chemotherapy + G-CSF (CG) (either high-dose cyclophosphamide at 3g/m2 or DCEP [4-day infusional dexamethasone/ cyclophosphamide/ etoposide/cisplatin]) in 49 consecutive stem cell collection attempts in patients with MM exposed to prior lenalidomide. The primary endpoint was the ability to collect sufficient stem cells for at least two transplants (minimum 5×106 CD34+ cells/kg), comparing results in terms of total exposure to lenalidomide and time elapsed from lenalidomide exposure until the mobilization attempt. The secondary endpoint was number of apheresis days required to meet collection goal. Resilts: Twenty-four patients underwent PG mobilization and twenty-five with CG (21 with G-CSF + cyclophosphamide, 4 with G-CSF+DCEP). The two groups did not differ in terms of total amount of lenalidomide exposure: median number of lenalidomide cycles for patients mobilized with PG was 6.5 (range 1.2–86.6), vs. 6 (range 2–21.6), for patients mobilized with CG (P = 0.663). The median time between mobilization and last lenalidomide dose was also similar between the two groups: 57.5 (range 12–462) days for PG vs. 154 (range 27–805) days for CG (P = 0.101). There was an equivalent rate of successful collection of 100% for PG and 96% for CG, P = 0.322. One patient failed collection in the CG group due to emergent hospitalization for septic shock during a period of neutropenia; no patient collected with PG had a serious adverse event that interrupted the collection process. Stem cell yield did not differ between the two arms (13.9 vs. 18.8 × 106 million CD34+ cells/kg for PG vs. CG respectively, P = 0.083). Average time to collection goal was also equal, with a median of time of 1 day required in both groups, (range 1–2 days for PG, 1–5 days for CG, P = 0.073). There was no relationship between amount of lenalidomide exposure and stem cell yield with either PG (P = 0.243) or CG (P = 0.867). Conclusion: A plerixafor + G-CSF mobilization schedule is equivalent in efficacy to chemotherapy + G-CSF in obtaining adequate numbers of stem cells for two autologous stem cell transplants in patients with MM exposed to lenalidomide; however, PG may be a less toxic approach than chemomobilization. Number of lenalidomide cycles has no impact on chances of stem cell collection success using either method. Disclosures: Mark: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau; Millenium Corp: Speakers Bureau. Zafar: Celgene Corp: Speakers Bureau. Niesvizky: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Prognostic Value of Cpss Cytogenetic Risk Classification in Patients with CMML after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Multicenter Study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-115981 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2182-2182

Author(s):

Christian Koenecke ◽

Dirk-Jan Eikema ◽

Sheree Hazelaar ◽

Dietrich W. Beelen ◽

Victoria Potter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Allogeneic Hsct

Abstract Introduction: The only curative treatment approach for patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but disease relapse after transplantation is a major concern. Predictors for disease outcome after HSCT are limited. However, unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities have been shown to serve as predictors for relapse after transplantation. The aim of this large multicentric, international study was to retrospectively determine the impact of cytogenetic information according to the CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CPSS) on outcome after allogeneic HSCT. Patients and Methods: Patients were selected from the EBMT database who had received a first allogeneic HSCT for the treatment of CMML between 2000 and 2015. 268 centers participated into this study. In total, 1503 patients were included. Impact of CPSS-cytogenetic classification was analyzed regarding overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality after HSCT (gray test). Results: 488 female (32.5%) and 1013 male (67.5%) patients were included to the study. Median age at HSCT was 57.6 years (range 0.3-75.4). At time of HSCT, only 422 (28.1%) patients were in complete remission, whereas 1004 (66.8%) had active disease (77 missing). Matched related donor HSCT was performed in 35.7% of the patients, matched unrelated donor HSCT in 57.6%, mismatched related in 3.3% and mismatched unrelated in 3.4%. Bone marrow (12.6%), peripheral blood (84.3%), or both (0.3%) served as the stem cell graft. Cord blood was used as a graft in 2.8%. Myeloablative preparative regimens wereused in 223 patients (15.0%), and less intensive regimens were given to 1268 patients (85.0%). Median survival of patients included into this study was 52.2 months. 637 patients had sufficient cytogenetic information according to CPSS (866 missing), complete relapse information was available in 1385 patients. 143 patients could be categorized into CPSS-high, 85 in intermediate and 375 in low risk cytogenetics, respectively. In univariate analysis high risk CPSS cytogenetic information was found to be strongly associated with OS (low 38% (32-44%), intermediate 41% (30-53%), high 26% (18-34%)), and higher cumulative incidence of relapse (low 40% (35-46%), intermediate 42% (30-54%), high 48% (39-56%)), but not with non relapse mortality (low 28% (23-33%), intermediate 25% (16-35%), high 30% (22-38%)) at 60 months (Figure 1). Conclusion: In this international, multicentric analysis we show that CMML patients with high-risk cytogenetics had significantly worse OS after HSCT than patients with intermediate or low risk cytogenetics according to CPSS. New therapeutic strategies to prevent relapse after HSCT in CMML patients with high-risk cytogenetics are needed. Disclosures Koenecke: Amgen: Consultancy; abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Beelen:Medac: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support. Finke:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Neovii: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Research Funding; Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau. Chalandon:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel costs. Ganser:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kobbe:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Optimal Conditioning for Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Receiving Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Propensity Score Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123699 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 42-42 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Stefan O. Ciurea ◽

Ankur Varma ◽

Piyanuch Kongtim ◽

Samer Srour ◽

Qaiser Bashir ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell ◽

Older Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Secondary Aml

Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is increasingly performed for older patients with AML; however, the optimal conditioning regimen for these patients remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of 404 patients with AML, ≥60 years receiving AHSCT at our institution between 01/2005-08/2018 who received 4 conditioning regimens: 1) fludarabine+melphalan 100mg/m2 (FM100, N=78), 2) fludarabine+melphalan 140mg/m2 (FM140, N=89), 3) fludarabine+IV busulfan x 4 days with Bu AUC≥5,000/day (equivalent dose 130mg/m2/day) (Bu≥5,000, N=131), 4) fludarabine+IV busulfan x 4 days with Bu AUC 4,000/day (equivalent dose 110mg/m2/day) (Bu4,000, N=106). To adjust for potential selection bias in choices of conditioning regimen, propensity score was calculated and used as a stratifying variable in a multivariable Cox regression model. Factors included in the propensity score calculation were age, secondary AML, ELN2017 genetic risk, remission status before transplant, induction failure, donor type, stem cell source and KPS. Results are presented for the FM100, FM140, Bu≥5,000 and Bu4000, respectively. Median follow-up survivors were 40, 74, 30 and 44 months, respectively (p=0.06). Donors are matched sibling, matched unrelated, haploidentical and mismatched unrelated donor in 126 (31%), 218 (54%), 40 (10%) and 20 (5%) patients, respectively. Patients in the FM100 group were significantly older and had lower KPS. The median age was 67, 64, 64 and 65 years, respectively (p=0.001), while 51%, 32%, 27% and 27% had KPS<90%, respectively (p<0.001). The HCT-CI of ≥3 was present in 57%, 62%, 56% and 70%, respectively (p=0.33), while 42%, 78%, 47% and 51% had high and very high-risk DRI, respectively (p<0.001), and 12%, 46%, 18% and 32% of the patients were transplanted in active disease (p<0.001). No significant differences were seen in both cytogenetic and ELN2017 genetic risk. More patients in FM100 group were treated using a standard of care protocol (73%, 64%, 25% and 31%, respectively, p<0.001). Grade 2-4 aGVHD at day 100 were 26% vs. 26%, 36% and 40% (p=0.04), and extensive cGVHD at 3 years 14% vs. 42%, 36% and 37%, respectively (p=0.07). The NRM at 3 years were 19%, 29%, 25% and 21% (p=0.06), and 3-year relapse rates were 32% vs. 32%, 30% and 55%, respectively (p=0.003). Among 4 groups, FM100 group had a significantly better PFS and GRFS with 5-year PFS for these 4 groups were 44%, 30%, 33% and 22% (p=0.02) and 5-year GRFS were 28%, 20%, 18% and 9% (p=0.006), respectively (Figure 1). For subgroup of patients with KPS <90%, 5-year PFS were 41%, 27%, 28%, 22%, respectively (p=0.007), while there was no significant difference between 4 conditioning groups in patients with high-risk AML defined as either secondary AML, induction failure or high-risk cytogenetics/high ELN2017 risk, suggesting that a more intense conditioning is not beneficial in this group of patients. The survival benefit of FM100 persisted after adjusted for baseline factors, transplant characteristics as well as propensity scores in a multivariable analysis (MVA). In MVA for PFS, HR was 0.57 (p=0.013) for FM100, 0.68 (p=0.056) for FM140 and 0.77 (p=0.137) for Bu> 5000 as compared with Bu 4,000 group (Figure 1). In the MVA for GRFS, HR for FM100, FM140 and Bu> 5000 was 0.53 (p=0.005), 0.78 (p=0.196), and 0.81 (p=0.178), respectively as compared with Bu 4,000 group. Other factors that independently predicted PFS were secondary AML (HR 1.68, p=0.001), remission status before transplant (HR 1.82, p=0.048 for CR with MRD positive, HR 1.87, p=0.043 for CR with unknown MRD status and HR 2.86, p=0.001 for active disease at transplant as compared with CR with MRD negative), KPS (HR 0.98, p=0.005) and use of a mismatched unrelated donor (HR 2.46, p=0.001 compared with matched related donor transplant). Conclusions: Older patients with AML benefit from a reduced-intensity conditioning with FM100 conditioning regimen, which was associated with better survival despite the fact that patients who could not receive more intense conditioning preferentially received this regimen. Higher intensity conditioning does not appear to improve survival in older patients. Alternative approaches to increase in conditioning intensity are needed to improve survival in patients with AML receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Disclosures Ciurea: Kiadis Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: stock holder; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bashir:Imbrium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acrotech: Research Funding; StemLine: Research Funding; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Oran:Astex pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AROG pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Popat:Bayer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. Konopleva:Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Ablynx: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kisoji: Consultancy, Honoraria; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; F. Hoffman La-Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Proteasome Inhibitor Treatment in Multiple Myeloma Can Mobilize Hematopoietic Stem Cells in the Absence of G-CSF

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.2452.2452 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 2452-2452

Author(s):

John N. Allan ◽

David Jayabalan ◽

Ruben Niesvizky ◽

Tomer M Mark ◽

Roger Pearse ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Flow Cytometry ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Proteasome Inhibitor ◽

Research Funding ◽

Fold Change ◽

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Introduction Proteasome inhibitor (PI) use in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) has been associated with increased hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) collection yields in both induction and autologous stem cell collection settings (Niesvizky et al., 2013). Animal models have confirmed this observation (Ghobadi et al., 2012). The mechanism remains unclear, but there is suggestion PI treatment affects pathways associated with HSPC anchoring and migration (Niesvizky et al., 2013). The effect of PIs on HSPC migration in the absence of filgastrim (G-CSF) stimulation remains unknown. We sought to characterize the molecular mechanisms of HSPC mobilization in a cohort of pts undergoing active PI treatment. Methods MM pts undergoing treatment with PIs were consented to obtain peripheral blood (PB) under IRB approval. Pts were eligible if they had symptomatic MM and were undergoing treatment with a PI. Pts receiving alkylating chemotherapy (such as cyclophosphamide) in combination with a PI were excluded. Pts were enrolled on the first day of a new cycle containing a PI. PB was drawn prior to administration of the PI (T0) and just prior to the next dose of PI, 24 or 72 hours later (T1), depending on whether the pt was receiving carfilzomib or bortezomib, respectively. PB mononuclear cells were collected and purified with Ficoll-Paque, viably frozen in CS-10 freezing medium and stored in liquid nitrogen. Serum samples were collected after a 1:2 dilution with PBS and stored at -80oF. Cells were later thawed to perform multiparameter flow cytometry and colony forming unit (CFU) assays. Multiparameter flow cytometry was performed using a BD LSR-II and analyzed using FloJo V9.0 software. Cells were gated on CD45dim SSC-lo characteristics. HSPCs were defined as CD34+/CD133+. Pts were stratified into 3 groups (>2, 1-2, <1) based on fold change in peripheral HSPCs from baseline T0. Expression of surface markers including CD38, CD184, CD202b, CD25, CD90 and CD31 within the HSPC population, were analyzed. Serum protein concentrations were analyzed using ELISAs. Results Twenty-three pts consented and collected at the 2 prespecified time points. Six pts (26%) increased the percentage of peripheral HSPCs>2 fold. Nine (39%) and 8 (35%) pts increased the percentage of HSPCs 1-2 fold and <1 fold over T0 percentage, respectively. There were no statistical differences within the 3 groups, in baseline characteristics, prior chemotherapy, use of IMIDs, or radiation exposure history. There was a significant positive correlation between peripheral HSPC fold change and CFU formation p=0.003 indicating the mobilized HSPC population’s capacity to form progeny. Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between fold change of HSPCs and CD90 expression on CD34+ CD133+ CD38- stem cell populations at T1 p=0.032. To determine changes in serum proteins as a result of PI treatment that could contribute to HSPC mobilization we evaluated TGF-ß levels in 13 pt plasma samples. Two pts from the>2fold group were available and revealed TGF-ß levels increase 67.24 pg/mL compared to a decrease of 17.67 pg/mL in 5 pts in the <1fold group trending towards significance p=0.094. Baseline levels of TGF-ß in the two groups,>2fold and <1fold were 18.1 pg/mL and 30.1 pg/mL respectively, which was not significant. Discussion Observations have noted increased HSPC yields in animal models and MM pts after treatment with PIs in both induction and mobilizing regimens (Ghobadi et al., 2012; Niesvizky et al., 2013). Here we demonstrate that treatment with PIs is associated with increases in peripheral HSPC percentages in approximately 2/3 of MM pts despite the lack of concurrent G-CSF. Decreased CD90 has previously been observed in peripherally mobilized HSPC products and, similar to TGF-ß, plays a role in regulation of Rhokinase GTPase pathways known to affect migration and adherence of many different cell types (Tsuchiya et al., 1997; Kim et al., 2006; Wen et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2014). Our study shows a correlation between decreased CD90 expression and fold increase of peripheral HSPCs. We also found an increase in TGF-ß serum levels after treatment in the>2fold group compared to the <1fold group, which may approach statistical significance with more sampling. These findings may help understand the failure to collect adequate HSPCs in a subset of MM pts and could highlight new pathways to disrupt and improve HSPC mobilization regimens. Disclosures Niesvizky: Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Mark:Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rossi:Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Successful Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells After Intensive Bendamustine Pre-Treatment In Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.4439.4439 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 4439-4439

Author(s):

Wolfram Pönisch ◽

Julia Wiesler ◽

Sabine Leiblein ◽

Elvira Edel ◽

Haifa K. Al-Ali ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Median Number ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Peripheral Blood Cd34 ◽

Ortho Biotech ◽

Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 4439 Introduction The alkylating agent bendamustine has structural similarities to both alkylating agents and purine analogs, and is effective in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. So far, no data are available on stem cell toxicity or on stem cell mobilization. Since autologous stem cell transplantation is an established treatment for multiple myeloma after primary treatment, we were interested in analysing the experience of stem cell mobilization after bendamustine treatment. Material and Methods A retrospective analysis over a period of fifteen years was carried out in 56 (34 male and 22 female) patients with multiple myeloma after bendamustine pretreatment at the university hospitals Leipzig and Heidelberg. Patients had a median age of 58 (range 31–72) years. The median number of cycles was 3 (range 1–10) and the cumulative bendamustine dose ranged from 120 to 2400 mg/qm. The mobilization regimen in 37 cases was either cyclophosphamide 4 g/qm (n=33) or 7 g/qm (n=4) followed by G-CSF (2×5 ug/kg s.c.). Alternative regimens such as CAD, CED, TCED and others were used for mobilization in the remaining 19 patients. Apheresis was started as soon as peripheral blood CD34+ counts exceeded 10×106/l with a harvest target of 4×106 CD34+/kg using 4 times the blood volume. The minimal accepted target was 2×106 CD34+/kg. Results Stem cell harvest was successful in 54 of the 56 patients. In one patient the peripheral blood CD34+ cell count failed to reach 10 × 106/l and no apheresis was performed. In one further patient a rapid decrease in peripheral blood CD34+ counts resulted in insufficient recovery of stem cells in the apheresis product. In 18 out of 54 patients (33%) the target was reached with a single apharesis. The median number of aphareses in the 54 patients was 2 (range 1–7) and the median CD34+ cell-count obtained was 5.5 (range 1.7–20.4) × 106/kg. Engraftment was successful in 52/53 patients receiving a stem cell transplant. One patient was successfully harvested and did not receive the transplant yet. Conclusion From this retrospective analysis we conclude that mobilization of PBSC is possible after intensive bendamustine pretreatment. Disclosures: Niederwieser: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Goldschmidt:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ortho Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Chugai Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Donor Lymphocyte Infusions for Relapsed Hematological Malignancies after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Single Center Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-120202 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4673-4673

Author(s):

Gunhan Gurman ◽

Guldane Cengiz Seval ◽

Sinem Civriz Bozdag ◽

Selami Kocak Toprak ◽

Meltem Kurt Yuksel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematological Malignancies ◽

Median Number ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Graft Versus Host ◽

Support Research

Abstract Introduction:Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is one of the therapeutic options for patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). DLI can augment the graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effect; however, it can sometimes induce severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infectious complications induced by bone marrow aplasia or immunosuppressive therapy. In this study, we wanted to assess the risk factors for GVHD and transplant-related mortality (TRM) as well as disease outcomes according to the reason for DLI in patients who received DLI after allo-HSCT. Patients and Methods:We retrospectively analyzed 152 patients with various hematological malignancies who received a total of 250 DLI in our center between March 1991 and July 2018 for disease relapse and at different intervals after allo-HSCT. We used our institutional database to evaluate details and characteristics of patients and DLI outcomes. The probabilities of overall survival were calculated from the day of transplantation with Kaplan-Meier analysis using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics 21; IBM Corp., Chicago, IL) statistical tool kit. Results:Median patient age was 34 years (range, 14-67 years); the patient cohort included 96 males (63.2%) and 36.8 female (56%). Patients evaluated in this study were adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (n=64), chronic myeloid leukemia (n=36), multiple myeloma (n=6), non-hodgkin lymphoma (4), primary myelofibrosis (n=6), myelodisplastic syndrome (n=3), and severe aplastic anemia (n=3). One hundred thirty-six (10.5%) and sixteen (10.5%) patients had sibling (SD) and unrelated donors (UD), respectively. The stem cell source was peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in 116 patients (76.3%) and the other 36 patients (23.8%) received bone marrow stem cells (BMSC). Patients underwent an allo-HSCT with a MAC (n= 109) or RIC (n=43) regimens at a median of 12.5 months from diagnosis. Cyclosporine and methotrexate were used as the main graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in our cohort. All patients received DLI for relapse or progression. Median number of DLI was 1 (range, 1-5), the median interval between transplant and first DLI was 6 months (range, 3-86 months), median number of infused CD3+cells x 106/kg of recipient body weight was 1.5x107(range, 0.5x107- 11.1x107). The median time from relapse to the first DLI was 1.9 months (range, 0.1-32.7 months). Thirty-one patients (21%) developed acute grade II to IV GVHD and 10 patients (7%) developed extensive chronic GVHD. We could not demonstrate the higher CD3+ cell dose of DLI associated with an increased risk of GVHD. Furthermore, none of our patients presented graft hypoplasia after DLI. At a median follow-up from transplantation interval of 16.3 months (range, 0.5-188.2 months), 35 patients were still alive (%60). The OS at 1 and 3 years was 63.4±0.4 and 28.2±0.4, respectively (Figure 1). The primary cause of death was relapse of the original disease in most of the patients, whereas 14 patients died of TRM (15.3%). Discussion:Various modifications of DLI have been investigated in combination with molecular-targeted agents to enhance the antitumor effect while minimizing GVHD. Therefore, further studies of larger randomized cohorts with high quality data management are required to clarify the role of DLI in relapsed hematological malignancies. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Civriz Bozdag: TAKEDA: Consultancy; MSD: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy. Özcan:MSD: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Jazz: Other; Janssen: Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Archigen: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Travel support; Bayer: Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Travel payment; Celgene: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel payment, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding. Ilhan:Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau. Beksac:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen,Janssen-Cilag,Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Outpatient BEAM Using Daily Etoposide and Cytarabine with Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma Is Feasible and Decreases Inpatient Length of Stay

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127402 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5830-5830

Author(s):

Naomi Cazeau ◽

Kathleen Cavalier ◽

Valkal Bhatt ◽

Courtney McElrath ◽

Nicole Lestrange ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Standard Of Care ◽

Outpatient Setting ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Hospital Days

Introduction: High dose therapy with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (BEAM) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is the most common consolidation therapy for chemosensitive patients with relapsed/refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) in the US. Inpatient hospitalization is usually required due to the twice daily dosing of etoposide and cytarabine, and patients remain admitted until neutrophil recovery. Utilizing our outpatient transplant program, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of outpatient BEAM with AHCT using daily dosed etoposide and cytarabine to enhance the patient experience and improve inpatient resource utilization. Methods: We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients treated in the outpatient setting at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Patients were eligible for outpatient AHCT if they did not have a clinical indication for inpatient continuous monitoring. Patients received BEAM conditioning consisting of carmustine on day -6 (300mg/m2), etoposide daily from day -5 through day -2 (200mg/m2/dose), cytarabine daily from day -5 through day -2 (400mg/m2/dose), and melphalan on day -1 (140mg/m2). AHCT on day 0, pegfilgrastim on Day +1, and supportive care were performed as per standard of care and institutional guidelines. Patients were seen daily by an advanced practice provider and HCT attending. Notably, service guidelines were revised to include a delayed emesis prophylactic regimen of oral dexamethasone (2mg bid) and lorazepam (0.5mg TID) from D+1 through D+7, which was initiated after the first three patients were treated. Patients were transfused packed red blood cells (pRBC) for hemoglobin <7g/dl and platelets for <20K/mcl. Results: From October 2018 to July of 2019, 13 patients (Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=5), mantle cell lymphoma (n=4), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=2), T-cell lymphoma (n=2), and grey zone lymphoma (n=1)) were treated. The median age was 40 years (range 26-71), and the majority were male (69%). Median cell dose infused was 5.89 CD34+ cells/kg (range 2.53-10.66). Two patients received cell infusions over 2 days, and three patients received washed cell infusion products. Two patients completed transplant entirely outpatient; the remainder required hospitalization during their transplant course. Reasons for admission included neutropenic fever (n=4), nausea (n=2), tachycardia (n=2), hypoxia (n=1), and other (n=2). Patients were admitted on a median of Day +6 (range Day+1 - Day+11) and remained inpatient for a median of 4 days (range 3-14). Eight patients (62%) returned to the outpatient stem cell transplant clinic for management prior to day 30. One patient was re-hospitalized prior to day 30. The median number of hospital days saved was 13 days/per patient. In total, 170 hospital days were saved with this regimen. Engraftment and toxicities were similar to inpatient administration. Neutrophil engraftment occurred at a median of Day+9 (range 8-11) with a median of 6 days of ANC<500 (IQR 8-11). Platelets comprised most of the transfusion support required, with a median of 4 platelet (range 2-8) and 2 pRBC (range 0-2) transfusions per patient. Grade 2 or higher diarrhea occurred for a median of 3.5 days (range 3-11) with 38% not having any diarrhea. A small percentage of patients required additional antiemetics outside the standard of care (23%). The median weight lost per patient was 2.5kg (range 0 - 10.3kg). Patients received intravenous fluid support with a median of 5 normal saline boluses (range 1-10). All patients maintained normal serum creatinine peri-transplant, with a median maximum serum creatinine of 0.9mg/dl (range 0.7-1.1). Six patients (46%) had engraftment syndrome. All patients were alive with a median follow-up of 91 days (range: 29-205). Conclusion: We found that BEAM followed by AHCT using daily dosed etoposide and cytarabine is feasible and safe for the outpatient setting with tolerability matching that of the traditional inpatient BEAM regimen. Moreover, this treatment method has the potential to reduce a considerable number of inpatient hospital days, while still safely maintaining a threshold for toxicity requiring inpatient admission. Disclosures Bhatt: Incyte: Consultancy. Landau:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Scordo:Angiocrine Bioscience, Inc.: Consultancy; McKinsey & Company: Consultancy. Sauter:Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding. Giralt:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Shah:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text