Two Years Versus Six Months of Oral Anticoagulation after a First Episode of Unprovoked Pulmonary Embolism: The Padis PE Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial

Abstract Background: Patients with a first episode of unprovoked pulmonary embolism have a high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) after anticoagulation is discontinued. Prolongation of anticoagulant therapy beyond the initial period of 3 to 6 months is associated with a significant reduction of recurrent VTE, but an excess of bleeding events. In addition, most studies assessing prolonged treatment did not follow the patients after treatment had been stopped. Thus, the optimal duration of anticoagulation in patients with a first unprovoked pulmonary embolism remains uncertain. Method: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, we compared an additional 18 months of warfarin (target International Normalized Ratio, 2 to 3) with placebo in patients with a first episode of unprovoked pulmonary embolism that had been initially treated with a vitamin K antagonist for 6 uninterrupted months. In both groups, all patients were followed up for an additional median period of 2 years after treatment had been stopped. Primary outcome was the composite of recurrent VTE or major bleeding during the 18-month treatment period. Secondary outcomes included the composite outcome during the entire study period (i.e. 18 months plus a median follow-up of 2 years), deaths not caused by pulmonary embolism or major bleeding and the components of the composite outcome during the treatment period and during the entire study period. All outcomes were centrally adjudicated. Results: A total of 371 patients were included in the study and analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. During the treatment period, the composite outcome occurred in 6 of 184 patients (3.3%) in the warfarin group and in 25 of 187 patients (13.5%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.55; p=0.0004). Recurrent VTE occurred in 3 (1.7%) patients in the warfarin group and in 25 (13.5%) in the placebo group (HR, 0.11; 95%CI, 0.03-0.37); major bleeding occurred in 4 (2.2%) patients in the warfarin group and in 1 (0.5%) in the placebo group (HR, 4.07; 95%CI, 0.45-36.38). Two deaths not related to the study outcome occurred in each group. During the entire median study period of 41 months, the composite outcome occurred in 33 (20.8%) patients in the warfarin group and in 41 (23.5%) in the placebo group (HR, 0.76; 95%CI, 0.48-1.20; p=0.24) (Figure 1). Recurrent VTE occurred in 28 (17.9%) patients in the warfarin group and in 39 (22.1%) in the placebo group (HR, 0.67; 95%CI, 0.41-1.08); major bleeding occurred in 6 (3.5%) patients in the warfarin group and in 4 (2.5%) in the placebo group (HR, 1.57; 95%CI, 0.44-5.55). Thirteen (11.9%) patients died in the warfarin group, four deaths being related to recurrent VTE and one to major bleeding; six (3.6%) patients died in the placebo group from a cause unrelated to recurrent VTE or bleeding (p=0.08). Of the 67 episodes of recurrent VTE, 52 (77.6%) were pulmonary embolism and 58 (86.6%) were unprovoked. Conclusion: After 6 months of anticoagulation for a first episode of unprovoked pulmonary embolism, extending anticoagulation for an additional 18 months was associated with a major reduction in the risk of recurrent VTE or major bleeding during the treatment period. However, this benefit was not maintained after discontinuation of anticoagulation. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00740883). Figure 1. Cumulative risk of the composite outcome (recurrent VTE or major bleeding) over the entire study period Figure 1. Cumulative risk of the composite outcome (recurrent VTE or major bleeding) over the entire study period Disclosures Couturaud: Astra Zeneka: Co-investigator in clinical trial, Co-investigator in clinical trial Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Co-investigator in clinical trial Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sanchez:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mismetti:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; boerhinger ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jego:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; actelion: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Parent:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lorillon:Astra Zeneka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, symposium invitation Other; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Girard:Leo Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lacut:Bayer-Healthcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Leroyer:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Investigator in COPD clinical trials, Investigator in COPD clinical trials Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneka: Investigator in asthma clinical trials Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Decousus:Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Meyer:Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding; LEO Pharma: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Mottier:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Validation of the Ottawa Score in Cancer Patients with Venous Thromboembolism. the Predicare Cohort Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129087 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 167-167 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Guy Meyer ◽

Celine Chapelle ◽

Philippe Girard ◽

Florian Scotté ◽

Anne Lamblin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Patients With Cancer ◽

Recurrent Vte ◽

Support Research

Introduction Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a difficult to treat condition in patients with cancer with a persisting risk of recurrent VTE during anticoagulant treatment with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Recent data suggest that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) are associated with a lower risk of recurrence but a higher risk of bleeding in these patients. Predicting the risk of recurrent VTE with LMWH may help to select the best treatment option. We conducted a prospective multicenter observational cohort study in cancer patients with VTE treated with tinzaparin for 6 months in order to validate the Ottawa score (NCT03099031) and search for additional risk of recurrent VTE. The Ottawa score is composed of 5 variables, female sex (+1), lung cancer (+1), breast cancer (-1) cancer stage 1 (-2) and previous DVT (+1). A score ≤0 is associated with a low risk of recurrent VTE. Methods Adult cancer patients with recent diagnosis of documented symptomatic or incidental VTE (deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) treated with tinzaparin for 6 months were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic VTE within the first 6 months of treatment with tinzaparin. Other endpoints were symptomatic recurrent VTE, major bleeding, heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), all-cause mortality within 3 and 6 months. All events were adjudicated by a Central Adjudication Committee. Time-to-event outcomes were estimated by the Kalbfleisch and Prentice method to take into account the competing risk of death. Cumulative incidences were presented with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). To validate the Ottawa score, the area under the curve (AUC) and its 95% CI were calculated on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis; the most discriminant cut-off was then determined by calculating the Youden index. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify additional predictive factors of recurrent VTE to those included in the Ottawa score using the Fine and Gray method and adjusted on factors included in the Ottawa score. Hazard ratio and their 95% CI were calculated. Results A total of 409 patients were included and analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis; the median age was 68 years and 51% of patients were males. 60.4% of patients had a PE (with or without DVT) .64% received chemotherapy at inclusion or in the month before inclusion. Lung (31.3%) and digestive track (18.3%) cancers were the most common cancer types and 67.0% had stage IV cancers. According to Ottawa score, 58% of patients were classified at high clinical probability of recurrence (score ≥ 1). During the 6 months treatment period, 23 patients had a recurrent VTE, yielding a cumulative incidence of 6.1% (95% CI 4.0-9.3) with a median time for recurrent VTE of 33 days. The recurrence rate of VTE was estimated to 7.8% (95% CI 4.9-12.5) for patients classified at high risk of recurrence according to the Ottawa score (score ≥ 1) compared to 3.8% (95%CI 1.6-8.9) for other patients (Ottawa score < 1). AUC of the Ottawa score was 0.60 (95% CI 0.55-0.65). In multivariable analysis, none of the potential risk factors for recurrent VTE was significantly associated with recurrent VTE at 6 months. During the 6 months treatment period, 15 patients had a major bleeding and 2 patients experienced a HIT. At 3 and 6 months, 104 and 144 patients had died yielding a cumulative incidence of 26.1%, (95% CI 21.8-30.4) and 37.8% (95% CI 32.8-42.9), respectively. The main cause of death was underlying cancer. Conclusion In this prospective cohort of patients with cancer receiving LMWH for VTE, the Ottawa score did not accurately predict recurrent VTE. No other clinical predictor of recurrent VTE was identified in this study. Disclosures Meyer: Bayer: Other: travel support; LEO pharma: Other: travel support, Research Funding; SANOFI: Other: travel support, Research Funding; BMS-Pfizer: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Girard:Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support. Scotté:LEO Pharma A/S: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Tesaro: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pierre Fabre Oncology: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lamblin:Leo Pharma: Employment. Laporte:Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boston scientific: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo-Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Switching to Warfarin after 6-Month Completion of Anticoagulant Treatment for Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.430.430 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 430-430 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Chatree Chai-Adisaksopha ◽

Alfonso Iorio ◽

Mark A. Crowther ◽

Javier de Miguel ◽

Estuardo Salgado ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Confidence Interval ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Cumulative Incidence ◽

Anticoagulation Therapy ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Warfarin Group ◽

Recurrent Vte ◽

Cancer Associated Thrombosis

Abstract Background: Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is considered to be an anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. The duration of treatment is recommended to maintain at least 3-6 months after the diagnosis. However, the data on continuing LMWH treatment beyond six months remains unclear. Methods: Consecutive cancer-associated thrombosis patients who were enrolled in RIETE Registry were evaluated. We systematically selected the patients who completed treatment with LMWH for 6 months. The patients were divided into two groups whether they continued to receive LMWH or switched to warfarin. The main outcomes were recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding and total bleeding. Survival curves were generated using Kaplan-Meier method and the curves were compared using the log-rank test. Hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using Cox-proportional hazard (PH) model. Outcomes: of the 1,502 eligible patients who completed 6-month anticoagulant therapy, 763 patients continued to received LMWH and 739 switched to warfarin. There was no significant difference in terms of recurrent VTE between two study groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.44-1.02, p=0.06), Figure 1. The cumulative incidence of major bleeding was 2.6% in LMWH group and 2.7% in warfarin group (HR 1.05, 95%CI; 0.79-1.55, p=0.79), Figure 2. The cumulative incidence of total bleeding was 6.7% in LMWH group and 7.0% in warfarin group (HR 0.92, 95%CI; 0.62-1.37, p=0.70). Conclusions: In patients with cancer-associated thrombosis who completed 6-month of anticoagulation therapy, switching to warfarin is not associated with increase in recurrent VTE, major bleeding or total bleeding when compared to continuing LMWH. Warfarin is an acceptable alternative anticoagulant in cancer-associated thrombosis patients who do not tolerate long-term treatment with LMWH. Disclosures Monreal: Bayer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; boehringer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; daichii: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Extended Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulation Therapy for Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism. a Review of Phase III and Phase IV Studies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.5011.5011 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 5011-5011

Author(s):

Franco Piovella ◽

Diana I Iosub

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trials ◽

Placebo Group ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Vitamin K Antagonist ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Anticoagulation Treatment ◽

Recurrent Vte

Abstract Duration of anticoagulation can be categorised into initial treatment, lasting 3, 6 or 12 months, and long-term treatment beyond 12 months. There is a strong rationale for anticoagulation treatment beyond the acute phase in many patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), being the risk of recurrent VTE after stopping anticoagulation high, particularly for unprovoked deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Several non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been approved in the acute setting; accumulating evidence suggests continuing treatment with these agents beyond 12 months offers additional benefits to patients with VTE. Apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been studied in this setting in a series of phase III extension studies (AMPLIFY-EXT, RE-MEDY and RE-SONATE, and EINSTEIN EXT, respectively). AMPLIFY-EXT evaluated patients who had completed 6-12 months of anticoagulation treatment with apixaban. Patients received either a further 12 months of apixaban at a dose of 2.5 mg or 5 mg twice daily, or placebo. Recurrent VTE or mortality from any cause were 3.8%, 4.2% and 11.6%, respectively (relative risk [95% confidence interval (CI)] vs placebo: 0.33 [0.22-0.48] and 0.66 [0.25-0.53], respectively); for major bleeding, rates were 0.2%, 0.1% and 0.5%, respectively (relative risk [95% CI] vs placebo: 0.49 [0.09-2.64] and 0.25 [0.03-2.24], respectively). In RE-MEDY, patients received either dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) or warfarin for 6-36 months after at least 3 months of prior anticoagulation treatment. Recurrent or fatal VTE occurred in 1.8% of patients treated with dabigatran versus 1.3% of warfarin-treated patients (P=0.01 for non-inferiority); major bleeding rates were lower with dabigatran (0.9% vs 1.8%) but this difference was not statistically significant. In the RE-SONATE study, dabigatran (150 mg twice daily) or placebo was administered for up to 12 months. Recurrent or fatal VTE was significantly lower with dabigatran (0.4% vs 5.6%; P<0.001). Rates of major bleeding were low in both groups (0.3% with dabigatran; no major bleeding episodes occurred in the placebo group); however, for the composite of major or non-major clinically relevant bleeding, the rate was significantly greater with dabigatran (5.3% vs 1.8%; P=0.001). In EINSTEIN EXT, patients who had completed 6-12 months of rivaroxaban or VKA anticoagulation treatment were randomised to receive either rivaroxaban or placebo for 6 or 12 months. Extended rivaroxaban treatment was associated with a significantly lower rate of recurrent VTE (1.3% vs 7.1%, respectively; P<0.001), and there was a moderate, non-significant, increase in the rate of major bleeding complications (0.7% of patients in the rivaroxaban group vs none in the placebo group; P=0.11). The phase III extension studies demonstrate the benefits of extended NOAC use versus treatment cessation, with reduced recurrence rates versus placebo, although associated with a potential moderate increase in bleeding risk; in addition, based on outcomes in patients given placebo, it is clear that not prescribing anticoagulation treatment is not a viable approach. VTE is associated with substantial costs, and recurrent episodes increase costs further. The costs are attributable to hospitalisation, treatment facility and staff and outpatient management. The lack of routine coagulation monitoring needed with use of NOACs may simplify patient management, thereby further reducing the burden on healthcare providers and patients. US and European guidelines advise long-term therapy in certain instances. They support NOAC use where they have been selected as the initial therapy choice and therapy needs to be extended beyond 3 months. In addition to clinical trials of extended anticoagulation, assessment of this therapy in routine clinical practice is essential, in order to confirm whether the results of clinical trials apply to a broad range of patients beyond the highly controlled setting of a clinical study. Phase IV data are now emerging (Dresden Noacs Registry, Xalia Study, Einstein Choice Study, Start Register) and are supportive of the findings from phase III studies. Future studies involving all NOACs will be valuable in determining the safety and effectiveness of long-term NOAC use in a wider patient population. Disclosures Piovella: GlaxoSmithKline: Speakers Bureau; Portola: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER/BMS: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) Study: A Perioperative Management Plan for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Who Are Receiving a Direct Oral Anticoagulant

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-120770 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. LBA-5-LBA-5 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

James Douketis ◽

Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽

Joanne M Duncan ◽

Marc Carrier ◽

Gregoire Le Gal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Perioperative Management ◽

Elective Surgery ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Arterial Thromboembolism ◽

High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Introduction: The perioperative management of patients who are taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for atrial fibrillation (AF) and require an elective surgery/procedure is uncertain. No studies have addressed the timing of perioperative DOAC interruption and resumption, and if perioperative heparin bridging and coagulation function testing are needed. The Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) Study hypothesized that a simple, standardized perioperative management strategy, based on DOAC-specific interruption and resumption intervals, that foregoes perioperative heparin bridging and coagulation function testing, is safe for patient care, with associated low rates of major bleeding (1%) and arterial thromboembolism (0.5%). We postulated that this management yields a high proportion of patients (>90%) with a minimal to no DOAC level at surgery/procedure. Methods: PAUSE is a prospective study with 3 parallel DOAC cohorts of patients with AF taking apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban and requiring anticoagulant interruption for an elective surgery/procedure. Patients were managed using a standardized protocol based on DOAC pharmacokinetic properties, procedure-associated bleeding risk (Appendix 1) and creatinine clearance (CrCl). DOACs were interrupted for 1 day before and after surgery for a low bleed risk surgery and 2 days before and after a high bleed surgery; longer interruption was done in patients on dabigatran with a CrCl<50 mL/min (Figure 1). A blood sample was obtained just before the procedure to measure residual DOAC levels (Appendix 2). Heparin bridging and preoperative coagulation testing were not used to manage patients. Patient follow-up occurred weekly for 30 days post-procedure for the primary clinical outcomes of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism (Appendix 3). The incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of clinical outcomes was determined for each DOAC cohort using an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (interrupted at least 1 DOAC dose) and per-protocol analysis (adhering to DOAC interruption and resumption protocol). Results: We enrolled 3007 patients from 23 sites in Canada, the U.S. and Europe (Appendix 4). The patient characteristics were (Figure 2): mean age 72.5 years; 66.1% male; 33.5% high bleeding risk surgery/procedure, with 1257 patients in the apixaban cohort, 668 in the dabigatran cohort and 1082 in the rivaroxaban cohort (Table 1). DOAC interruption and resumption intervals are shown in Table 2. The 30-day postoperative rate (95% CI) of major bleeding was 1.35% (0-2.00) in the apixaban cohort, 0.90% (0-1.73) in the dabigatran cohort and 1.85% (0-2.65) in the rivaroxaban cohort; the rate (95% CI) of arterial thromboembolism was 0.16% (0-0.48) in the apixaban cohort, 0.6% (0-1.33) in the dabigatran cohort and 0.37% (0-0.82) in the rivaroxaban cohort (Table 3). There were 2541 (84.5%) patients with preoperative DOAC levels measured: a level <50 ng/ml occurred in 90.5% of patients in the apixaban cohort, in 95.1% of the dabigatran cohort and in 96.8% of the rivaroxaban cohort. Of 1007 patients having a high bleeding risk procedure, 832 (82.6%) had DOAC levels measured: 98.8% had a level <50 ng/mL (Table 4). Rates of major bleeding and arterial thromboembolism in the per protocol analysis were comparable to those of the ITT analysis (Table 5). Conclusions: In patients with AF who were taking a DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban) and required anticoagulant interruption for an elective surgery/procedure, using a standardized DOAC-specific perioperative management strategy was safe for patient care, with associated low rates of perioperative MB (<2%) and ATE (<1%). Further, a high proportion of patients (>90% overall; 98.8% at high bleeding risk) had a minimal or no residual DOAC level at the time of the surgery/procedure. PAUSE is the largest study, to date, that addresses how to manage the common problem of perioperative DOAC management. It is likely to have a practice-changing impact and will inform future practice guidelines in perioperative care. Study Funding: CIHR (313156) and the H&S Foundation of Canada (G-14-0006136). Aniara-Hyphen Biomed (assays). Acknowledgments: We thank Drs. Walter Ageno, David Garcia, Lehana Thabane, Wendt Lim, Lori Linkins, William Ristevski, and Demetrios J. Sahlas. Also, Kayla Lucier, Grace Wang, Tara McDougall, and HRLMP and CRLB. Supported by CanVector and REDCap. Disclosures Douketis: Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Other: Advisory Board; Biotie: Other: Advisory Board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory Board; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; The Medicines Company: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Astra-Zeneca: Other: Advisory Board; Portola: Other: Advisory Board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board. Spyropoulos:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy. Carrier:Bayer: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vanassche:Bayer: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; BMS/Pfizer: Consultancy. Verhamme:Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medtronic: Honoraria; Portola: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shivakumar:Pfizer: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Honoraria. Gross:Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria. Lee:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria; LEO Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Le Templier:BMS-pfizer: Honoraria. Wu:Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS-Pfizer: Honoraria. Coppens:Bayer: Honoraria, Other: Non-financial support, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Other: non-financial support, Research Funding; Uniqure BV: Research Funding. Arnold:Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Caprini:Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Recovery Force: Consultancy; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizor: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen R&D: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Summer:Octapharma: Honoraria. Schulman:Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Mobilization with Plerixafor (Mozobil ®)Plus G-CSF Results in Superior Day 1 Collection of CD34+ Cells Compared to Placebo Plus G-CSF: Results From Two Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials in Patients with Multiple Myeloma or Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3224.3224 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3224-3224 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Brian J. Bolwell ◽

Auayporn P. Nademanee ◽

Patrick Stiff ◽

Edward Stadtmauer ◽

Richard T. Maziarz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Placebo Group ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Yield ◽

P Value ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cell Dose ◽

Cd34 Cells ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 3224 Poster Board III-161 Background While most centers use 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg as the minimal cell dose for autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation (auto-HSCT), infusion of higher CD34+ cell dose is associated with better outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Recent evidence suggests a correlation between CD34+ cell yield on Day 1 of collection and total CD34+ cell yield as well as post-transplant outcomes. This analysis was designed to: 1) compare Day 1 collection between patients with NHL or MM mobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF or placebo plus G-CSF; and 2) determine whether Day 1 CD34+ cell yields correlated with the total mobilization yield and number of apheresis days. Methods Data were obtained from two prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials that compared the safety and efficacy of plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg/day SQ) plus G-CSF (10 μg/kg/day) with placebo plus G-CSF for mobilization of HSC for auto-HSCT in patients with NHL (3101 Study) or MM (3102 Study). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the association of day 1 CD34+ cell collection with total CD34+ cell yield and the number of days of apheresis. Results In the NHL trial, 150 patients were mobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF and 148 patients underwent mobilization with placebo plus G-CSF. More than half the patients (55.3%) in the plerixafor group collected ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg on Day 1 of apheresis (Figure 1A). In contrast, 19.6% patients in the placebo group collected ≥ 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg on Day 1 of apheresis (p< 0.001). In the MM study, 148 patients were mobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF and 154 patients were mobilized with placebo plus G-CSF. More than half the patients (52.7%) in the plerixafor group collected ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg on the first day of collection compared to only 16.9% patients in the placebo group (p<0.001; Figure 1B). There was a strong positive correlation between day 1 collection and the total CD34+ cell yield in patients with NHL (r= 0.86, p-value= <0.0001) or MM (r= 0.87, p-value= <0.0001) in both the plerixafor and placebo groups. For NHL patients, the median Day 1 collection was higher in the plerixafor group compared to the placebo group: 2.66 × 106 vs. 0.77 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (p<0.001) and this translated into higher total CD34+ cell yields in the two groups respectively: 5.69 × 106 vs. 1.98 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (p<0.001). Similarly, for MM patients, the median CD34+ cells/kg collected on Day 1 was higher in the plerixafor group compared to the placebo group: 7.01 × 106 vs. 2.29 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (p<0.001) and this translated into better overall collection in the plerixafor vs. placebo groups: 10.96 × 106 vs. 6.18 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (p<0.001). A negative correlation was observed between CD34+ cells collected on Day 1 and the number of days of apheresis performed in patients with NHL (r= -0.67, p-value=<0.0001) or MM (r= -0.50, p-value= <0.0001) in both the plerixafor and placebo groups. Consequently, better Day 1 collection in plerixafor-treated NHL or MM patients translated into significantly fewer apheresis days to achieve the target collection compared to placebo treated patients. Conclusions These data support previous reports demonstrating a strong correlation between day 1 CD34+ cell collection and total CD34+ cell yield and apheresis days. These data also demonstrate that addition of plerixafor to G-CSF allows significantly more patients to achieve the target cell collection within 1 day of apheresis compared to G-CSF alone. These findings support the observation that mobilization with plerixafor plus G-CSF reduces the number of apheresis days required to achieve the minimal or optimal cell dose to proceed to transplantation. Disclosures Bolwell: Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nademanee:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stiff:Genzyme Corp.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stadtmauer:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Maziarz:Genzyme Corp.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Micallef:Genzyme Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Marulkar:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gandhi:Genzyme Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. DiPersio:Genzyme: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

The EINSTEIN DVT Study: Does Localization of the Initial DVT Affect the Occurrence of Recurrent VTE While Patients Are on Anticoagulation?

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.207.207 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 207-207

Author(s):

Martin H Prins ◽

Paolo Prandoni ◽

Anthonie WA Lensing ◽

Bonno van Bellen ◽

Akos F Pap ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Recurrent Events ◽

Femoral Vein ◽

Popliteal Vein ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Common Femoral Vein ◽

Vein Thrombosis ◽

Venous Thromboembolic Events ◽

Recurrent Vte

Abstract Abstract 207 Background: The extent of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is, for many physicians, an important variable that is considered in decisions on the type and duration of anticoagulant treatment. Although it has been consistently demonstrated that localization of the initial DVT is a powerful and independent predictor of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) after discontinuation of anticoagulation (Baglin T et al. J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:2436–2442), it remains unknown to what extent localization of the initial DVT affects the occurrence of recurrent VTE while patients are on anticoagulation. Data from the EINSTEIN DVT study, which randomized 3,449 patients with proximal DVT, offers an opportunity to investigate this question. Aim: To investigate whether localization of the initial DVT was predictive of the rate of recurrent venous thromboembolic events in the whole cohort of patients in the EINSTEIN DVT study, in those who received rivaroxaban, or in those who received conventional anticoagulation with enoxaparin plus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) followed by VKA alone. Methods: Patients were randomized to rivaroxaban or enoxaparin plus VKA followed by VKA only for intended treatment durations of 3, 6, or 12 months. Patients were grouped into four categories according to the extent of the proximal vein thrombosis that was recorded at baseline: 1) popliteal vein alone; 2) popliteal and superficial femoral vein; 3) popliteal, superficial femoral, and common femoral vein; and 4) all combinations of DVT without popliteal vein involvement. Patients were followed for recurrent events. All baseline and recurrent events were assessed by a central independent adjudication committee that was unaware of treatment allocation. The effect of thrombus location on the incidence of recurrent VTE was assessed using a Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Recurrent VTE occurred in 21/1,040 (2.0%) patients with popliteal vein thrombosis only; in 28/1,002 (2.8%) patients with thrombosis located in the popliteal and superficial femoral vein; in 26/935 (2.8%) patients with thrombosis in the popliteal, superficial femoral, and common femoral vein (± iliac vein); and in 11/370 (3.0%) patients without popliteal vein involvement. None of these differences was statistically significant (p=0.87). The relative effect of rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin/VKA was similar in these subgroups (Table). Conclusions: At baseline, most patients in the EINSTEIN DVT study had thrombosis that involved more than one proximal vein. While patients were on treatment, the extent of the DVT at baseline was not predictive for recurrent VTE irrespective of type of treatment. Patients with extensive thrombosis (i.e. popliteal, superficial femoral, and common femoral vein involvement) had a recurrence rate below 3%, which was similar to the rate of recurrence in patients with thrombosis in only one vein at baseline. In summary, this analysis suggests that the localization and extent of the initial DVT was not predictive of the rate of recurrent venous thromboembolic events in the EINSTEIN DVT patient population while patients were on anticoagulation. Character count: 2670/3800 (spaces excluded) (2983 including table) Disclosures: Prins: Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy, Honoraria. Prandoni:GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lensing:Bayer HealthCare AG: Employment. van Bellen:Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Pap:Bayer HealthCare AG: Employment. Raskob:Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelhiem: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Büller:Sanofi-aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer HealthCare: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Persistent Impairments in Humoral and Cellular Immunity in Patients with Immune Thrombocytopenia Treated with Rituximab: A Sub-Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.492.492 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 492-492

Author(s):

Ishac Nazi ◽

John G. Kelton ◽

Mark Larche ◽

Denis P. Snider ◽

Jane C. Moore ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

Placebo Group ◽

B Cells ◽

Antibody Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Bactericidal Activity ◽

Research Funding ◽

Fold Increase ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Adequate Antibody Response

Abstract Abstract 492 Background: The anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, is increasingly being used as a treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The concern about rare occurrences of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in this population and the reliance on vaccine responses in patients who ultimately require splenectomy calls for additional studies into the integrity of the immune system after rituximab treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate both the antibody and cellular responses to the Streptococcus pneumoniae polysaccharide vaccine and to the Haemophilus influenza type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine in rituximab-treated patients with ITP. Methods: Adults with primary ITP and a platelet count below 30 x109/L who had participated in a randomized trial of rituximab or placebo were eligible for this prospective sub-study. Six months after the study intervention, patients were given the S. pneumoniae polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax-23®, Merck) and the Hib conjugate vaccine (ActHIB®, Aventis). Antibodies against the pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide (anti-PCP) and Hib polyribosyl-ribitol phosphate (anti-PRP) were measured by EIA. A bactericidal assay was used to measure the ability to eradicate Hib in culture. An adequate antibody response was defined as a 4-fold increase in antibody concentration from baseline in the first month post vaccination. IgG anti-PRP ≥ 1 μg/mL was considered protective. For the bactericidal assay, a 4-fold increase from baseline was considered positive. CD3+ T-cells and total (CD19+), naïve (CD19+, CD27−), memory (CD19+, CD27+, CD38−) and pre-plasma (CD19low, CD27hi, CD38hi) B-cells were determined by flow cytometry before and after vaccinations. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) secreting T-cells were measured by elispot. Results: Patients who had been randomized to receive rituximab (n=14) or placebo (n=6) participated in this prospective study. Compared with placebo, fewer patients in the rituximab group achieved an adequate antibody response to S. pneumonia vaccine (21.4% versus 66.7%) or the Hib vaccine (28.6% versus 83.3%). These results correlated with a reduced bactericidal effect of anti-PRP antibodies observed in patients treated with rituximab compared with placebo (14.2% versus 83.3%). Two patients in the rituximab group demonstrated an adequate rise in antibody titer but with no functional bactericidal activity. In addition, 3 patients who did not mount an adequate antibody response, had IgG anti-PRP titers below protective levels and did not demonstrate bactericidal activity in vitro were considered Hib vaccine failures. There were no Hib vaccine failures in the placebo group. In the rituximab group, total number of B-cells declined rapidly after treatment (1.895 × 104/mL) relative to the placebo group (5.65 × 104/mL) and never fully recovered even 1 year post-treatment. Resting memory B-cells were significantly reduced after rituximab and remained at low levels even up to 1 year. Conversely, naïve B-cells recovered to near normal levels within 6 months of treatment. Activated pre-plasma B-cells increased following vaccination in the placebo group; yet, this response was variable in patients who had received rituximab. CD3+ T-cell numbers were unaffected by rituximab and vaccination; however, the number of IFN-γ- secreting T-cells were lower in the rituximab group. Conclusions: Rituximab treatment was associated with an impaired antibody response to vaccination, which in some patients was only demonstrated by impaired bactericidal activity. The expected increase in B-cell subsets was not observed following vaccination in the rituximab group, and T-cells, while normal in number, demonstrated functional impairments. Our findings characterize subtle defects in immunity which may persist after rituximab treatment. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Rituximab is not licensed for use with ITP patient. Kelton:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hoffman-LaRoche: Research Funding. Arnold:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Hoffman-LaRoche: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Long Term Treatment and Prevention Of Recurrent VTE In Cancer Patients: Results Of The Canadian Proact Survey

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.5581.5581 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 5581-5581

Author(s):

Normand Blais ◽

Charles A. Butts ◽

Mark A. Crowther ◽

Nanette Cox-Kennett ◽

Josée Martineau

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Term Treatment ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Extended Treatment ◽

Treatment And Prevention ◽

Long Term Treatment ◽

Recurrent Vte

Abstract Introduction Cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients after death from cancer. Despite multiple available guidelines for CAT management, there remains variability in treatment practices. In order to gain insight on this variability in Canada, a survey was conducted to identify the perceived importance of managing CAT, identify differences in the pharmacological management of CAT, highlight the main barriers to optimal extended treatment and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), outline challenges associated with long term treatment adherence, and identify predictors of patient non-adherence. Methods A survey was designed targeting physicians involved in the management of CAT. The questionnaire included queries on physician practice, 37 items related to beliefs and attitudes about extended treatment for prevention of recurrence of VTE, and a 30-item patient-specific profile. Results Responses were obtained from 21 professionals from four Canadian provinces (Nova Scotia, Quebec, Ontario, and Alberta); 76% were hematologists and/or oncologists, 14% were internists and 10% were pharmacists. Community and academic centers were well represented. Specific management profiles were obtained for 131 patients. Most care givers felt that VTE recurrence was an important issue deserving extended therapy for most patients. Although more than 90% believed bleeding and recurrent VTE risk should influence the length of treatment, only 62% believe that VTE recurrence risk should modify the type of treatment and 52% were concerned of the risk of bleeding with long term therapy (≥6 months). 71% of respondents believed patients’ lack of awareness of the risk of recurrent VTE reduces adherence to anticoagulant therapy for extended treatment of VTE. Although 100% of respondents detailed giving verbal patient counseling, only 19% provided written information to patients. 95% stated they assessed compliance verbally; less than 20% used more objective measures (pharmacy records, laboratory monitoring). Participants admitted to using results of clinical trials (95%) more than clinical guidelines (48%) as most felt that the published guidelines contained conflicting recommendations. The main drivers of treatment choice were clinical evidence, efficacy, and personal experience. No respondents indicated they preferred to use oral anticoagulants for extended therapy of CAT and 43% believed that LMWHs should not be used interchangeably. Most (95%) stated they follow-up with patients directly to reassess therapy after 3-6 months of treatment. The patient profile information showed the median age of patients was 62 years and 60% were female. Lung cancer, colon cancer, breast cancer, and lymphoma were the most common tumor sites and accounted for 50% of described cases. Cases of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) were evenly represented and 82% were symptomatic. Most events were temporally related to cancer therapy (69%), presence of a central venous catheter (18%), and recent surgery (17%). Less than 5% of these cases presented with a contraindication to anticoagulation therapy (severe thrombocytopenia, active bleeding) at CAT diagnosis. Most patients were treated in the outpatient setting. Nonetheless, hospitalization was required in 33% of cases with an average patient stay of 10.8 days. Hospitalized patients were preferentially treated with LMWH (84%) and usually stayed on the same regimen upon discharge (8.3 ± 6.4 months). Long term treatment was largely managed with LMWHs (most frequently dalteparin – 80% of all treated patients) while few were managed with vitamin K antagonists (6%) or novel direct antithrombotics (2%). Anticoagulant therapy for outpatients was prescribed for 9.0 ± 7.7 months after the most recent VTE episode. Conclusion In Canada, CAT is believed to be an important complication of cancer. Extended therapy is indicated for most patients with CAT. Although bleeding risk is perceived as an important reason to modify therapy, contraindications to LMWHs were rare in the reported cases. Uptake of outpatient therapy of CAT is widespread in this country, yet hospitalization is still frequently required at diagnosis and is associated with prolonged inpatient stays. Even if non-adherence to antithrombotic therapy was believed to be rare among patients with CAT, this was rarely rigorously monitored. Disclosures: Blais: Pfizer: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Leo: Consultancy. Butts:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Crowther:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy; Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxter: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Asahi Kasai: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Viropharma: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cox-Kennett:Pfizer: honorarium as a speaker Other. Martineau:Pfizer: honorarium as a speaker Other; Boehringer: honorarium as a speaker, honorarium as a speaker Other; Bayer: honorarium as a speaker, honorarium as a speaker Other; Sanofi: honorarium as a speaker and participated in clinical trial, honorarium as a speaker and participated in clinical trial Other; BMS: honorarium as a speaker Other.

Download Full-text

Major Bleeding Complications Among Patients Treated with Ibrutinib and Concomitant Antiplatelet, Anticoagulant, or Supplemental Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4387.4387 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4387-4387 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Aaron Pavlik ◽

Hallie Barr ◽

Emily Dotson ◽

John C. Byrd ◽

Kristie A. Blum ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Bleeding Event ◽

Antiplatelet Agents ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Major Bleeding Events

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib, an orally bioavailable small molecular inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), is an approved therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and Waldenstrӧm's macroglobulinemia (WM). Beyond B lymphocytes, BTK signaling is important for collagen-mediated platelet activation, and BTK inhibition has been associated with primary hemostatic bleeding events (Levade et al Blood 2014). Although serious bleeding events have been uncommon (1-5%) in clinical trial populations, there is limited data describing the potential for increased serious bleeding incidence when ibrutinib is co-administered with other agents affecting the clotting cascade or platelet function. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the incidence of major bleeding in patients receiving ibrutinib concomitantly with antiplatelet agents (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, ADP inhibitors), anticoagulants (heparins, warfarin, novel oral anticoagulants), or supplements with potential anticoagulant activity (vitamin E and fish oil). Major bleeding events were identified using criteria developed by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (Schulman et al J Thromb Haemost 2005). Patients 18-89 years of age and treated with ibrutinib for CLL, MCL, or WM between March 1, 2010 and March 1, 2015 were included. The primary endpoint of this study was the incidence of major bleeding events, but we also sought to identify risk factors associated with the development of major bleeding, focusing on potential drug interactions. Based on the historic prevalence of major bleeding in ibrutinib clinical studies, we calculated that at least 20 major bleeding events would need to be identified in order to perform blinded multinomial regression on the collected data of an estimated 400 patients. Results: 437 eligible patients were included in the analysis. Patients were overwhelmingly male (71.4%) and white (94.8%), with a mean age of 67.1 years (range: 29-89). 53.1% received ibrutinib as participants of a clinical trial, and the remainder received standard-of-care ibrutinib treatment. The table (upper panel) summarizes use of concomitant antihemostatic agents by presence or absence of major bleeding events. Characteristics of the major bleeding events are further detailed in the lower panel. The most commonly observed concomitant antihemostatic medication was aspirin, with 147 patients (33.6%) being exposed to aspirin within the study period. Fourteen instances of major bleeding were observed, corresponding to an overall incidence of 3.2%. These major bleeding events all occurred in CLL patients receiving ibrutinib at the standard dose of 420 mg daily. Two patients had platelet counts less than 50 k/µL at time of the bleeding event. One-half of the major bleeding events were observed in the absence of an antihemostatic medication, and 2 of the observed major bleeding events resulted in death (1 received concomitant warfarin). Fourteen patients (3.3%) in the group without major bleeding were on anticoagulation, 4 being warfarin. The most common sites of major bleeding were gastrointestinal (50%), intracranial (14.3%) and thoracic (14.3%). While most patients developing major bleeding permanently discontinued ibrutinib (57.1%), approximately one third of the patients who developed major bleeding subsequently resumed ibrutinib following resolution of the bleeding event. Subsequently, these patients did not experience a recurrent major bleeding event. The rate of major bleeding did not meet power to detect statistical differences in bleeding events when comparing concomitant therapy, Conclusions: Our observed incidence of major bleeding is consistent with previous controlled clinical trials, suggesting similar safety profile when ibrutinib is used outside of a controlled setting. Major bleeding events were uncommon despite the frequent co-administration of antiplatelet agents. However, because we modified practice early to avoid therapeutic anticoagulation during ibrutinib therapy whenever possible, the number of patients receiving such drugs in combination was small and precludes inferences regarding safety. Table Table. Disclosures Blum: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Awan:Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Novartis Oncology: Consultancy. Woyach:Acerta: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding. Christian:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Jones:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Primary Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer and Central Venous Catheter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146904 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2139-2139

Author(s):

Allen Li ◽

Willem Brandt ◽

Cameron Brown ◽

Tzu-Fei Wang ◽

Rick Ikesaka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Research Funding ◽

Venous Catheter ◽

Bleeding Complications ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Central Venous ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Patients With Cancer

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of mortality in patients with cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and healthcare expenditure. The risk of VTE is also increased following the insertion of a central venous catheter (CVC) for chemotherapy deliverance and supportive care. The risks and benefits of primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer and newly inserted CVC are unclear. Objective We sought to assess the rates of VTE and major bleeding complications to determine the safety and efficacy of primary thromboprophylaxis in adult patients with cancer and a CVC. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and all EBM was conducted. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult patients with cancer and a CVC receiving primary thromboprophylaxis or observation/placebo were included. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were total VTE and major bleeding episodes, respectively. Results A total of 9 RCTs (3155 patients) were included in the analysis. The total rates of VTE were significantly lower in patients receiving primary thromboprophylaxis compared to those not receiving primary prevention (7.6% vs. 13%; Odds Ratio (OR) 0.51, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.82, p < 0.01, I² = 52%) (Figure 1). The rate of major bleeding complication was not increased in patients receiving thromboprophylaxis (0.9% vs. 0.7%; OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.29 to 4.40, p = 0.87, I² = 32%) (Figure 2). Conclusions Primary thromboprophylaxis significantly reduced the risk of VTE without increasing the risk of major bleeding complications in patients with cancer and CVC. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leo Pharma: Research Funding. Ikesaka: LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wells: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria. Carrier: Servier: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aspen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LEO Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text