scholarly journals Effect of Active Hepatitis C Infection in Relapse-Free Survival Among Patients with HIV‐Related Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4132-4132
Author(s):  
Jesus D Gonzalez-Lugo ◽  
Ana Acuna-Villaorduna ◽  
Urvi A Shah ◽  
Ellen W. Friedman

Introduction: Diffuse-large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma associated with Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). During the past decades, the incidence of HIV-related lymphomas has declined; however, it still remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. Before highly effective antiretroviral therapy for HIV was introduced, individuals with HIV-related DLBCL had worse complete response and survival rates compared to their uninfected counterparts. Additionally, recent studies have shown that relapse rates are lower for DLBCL patients that achieve HCV sustained virological response (SVR). Nevertheless, outcomes in patients with active HCV infection among patients with HIV-related DLBCL have not been reported yet. This study is aimed to compare the clinical outcomes in HIV-related DLBCL among patients with and without active HCV infection. Methods: Patients with HIV infection and newly diagnosed DLBCL between 2005 and 2017 at Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine were identified using the institutional software Clinical Looking Glass. Cases were grouped into concomitant HIV and HCV infection (HIV + HCV) or HIV alone (HIV) based on HCV antibody and viral load counts at DLBCL diagnosis. Patients with active hepatitis B infection were excluded. Data regarding demographics, laboratory parameters, HCV treatment, lymphoma treatment and clinical outcomes including complete response (CR), progression of disease (POD) and relapse were collected by manual chart review and compared among groups. SVR was defined as undetectable HCV RNA level 12 weeks after HCV treatment completion. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without active HCV at the time of outcome evaluation. For this purpose, patients that achieved SVR for HCV were analyzed in the HIV group. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare 12-months relapse-free survival (RFS) among groups. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 14.1. Results: A total of 63 patients were identified, of whom 45 (71.4%) had HIV alone (HIV) and 18 (28.6%) had concomitant active HCV and HIV infection (HIV + HCV). The median age was 49 years (IQ: 40-54), there were 39 (61.9%) males, 27 (42.9%) were Non-Hispanic Black and 27 (42.9%) were Hispanic. At DLBCL diagnosis, the majority of cases had advanced stages (stage 3: 15; 25% and stage 4: 40; 66.7%), the median CD4 count was 117 (IQ: 65-217) and 45 (72.6%) had AIDS. Baseline characteristics did not differ among groups. Of 63 patients, 53 (84.1%) were treated for DLBCL. Treatment regimens included DA-EPOCH (28; 50.9%), CHOP (22; 40%) and others (3; 9.1%). Rituximab was given to 33 cases (57.9%). Within the HIV + HCV group, only 3 (16.7%) patients received treatment for HCV; all of them were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and achieved SVR. In the full cohort, CR was achieved in 17 (32.1%) treated patients and 19 (35.9%) had POD. The CR rate was lower for patients with active HCV + HIV compared to HIV alone (7.1% vs. 41%, p=0.02) and there was no difference in POD among groups (28.6% vs. 38.5%, p=0.37). Patients with active HCV + HIV had a significantly lower 18-month RFS compared to those with HIV (62.9% vs. 87.4%, p=0.035). In a multivariate model adjusted for stage, AIDS and rituximab use; active HCV + HIV was a predictor for relapse (OR:6.36, 95% CI: 1.01 - 39.9, p=0.048). Conclusions: Despite available and effective treatment against HCV infection, only a minority of patients with DLBCL-related HIV received HCV treatment. Active HCV seems to play a role in the outcomes of patients treated for DLBCL and was found to be a predictor for relapse. Hence, HCV treatment should be considered for patients with HIV-related DLBCL. Disclosures Shah: Physicians' Education Resource: Honoraria. Friedman:Incyte pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4676-4676
Author(s):  
Michael E. Confer ◽  
Jonathan D. Tward ◽  
Sherrie L. Perkins ◽  
Glen M. Bowen ◽  
Robert J. Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Non-mycosis fungoides (MF) primary cutaneous lymphoma (PCL) is rare, and the more indolent forms seldom progress to fatal, systemic lymphoma. Nevertheless, frequent relapses are common. Although several therapies exist, no standard of care has been established for initial treatment. OBJECTIVES: To compare the role of radiotherapy to other initial treatment options and to evaluate clinicopathologic factors affecting overall, cause-specific, and relapse-free survival METHODS: Thirty-eight patients from 1985 to 2006 were retrospectively identified and reviewed with non-MF PCLs including: primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma, primary cutaneous marginal zone B-cell lymphoma, primary cutaneous follicle-center lymphoma, primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type, or primary cutaneous intravascular large B-cell lymphoma. Regression-free, cause-specific, and overall survival was estimated using the methods of Kaplan and Meier. Outcomes were compared with the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: 38 patients were included in the analysis with a median follow-up time of 34.6 months (range 2 – 138 months). The distribution of initial treatment was: surgery - 29%, topical therapy - 16%, systemic therapy - 18%, and radiation - 63%. Three patients never received radiation. For the entire cohort, the 5-year overall (OS), cause-specific (CSS), and relapse free survival (RFS) was 86.2%, 88.9%, and 29.5% respectively. Subjects who received radiation therapy (n=24) as part of their initial treatment course had a significantly longer median time to first relapse of 57 months compared to 3.2 months for the 14 subjects who did not receive radiotherapy (log-rank p < 0.0001). Overall survival was significantly improved for subjects whose International Prognostic Index (IPI) score was 0–1 (n=25) versus those whose score was 2 or greater (n=13, p=0.05). Multivariate analysis for RFS revealed that the absence of radiation as part of initial treatment (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 22.2, 95% CI 2.1 – 238.5, p=0.01) and aggregate size less than 10cm (HR 0.04, 95% CI 0.0 – 0.3, p<0.01) significantly altered the risk of relapse. No relapses were observed within the radiation therapy treatment field in 31/35 (89%) subjects following their first course of radiation therapy. Of the 15/35 (43%) of patients that relapsed anywhere following radiation, only 2/15 (13%) relapsed in-field exclusively, 2/15 (13%) relapsed both in and out-of-field, and the remaining 11/15 (73%) relapsed exclusively outside the area treated. No patient relapsed within the treatment field of after 24 months. CONCLUSION: An initial course of radiation therapy significantly delays relapse compared to other therapies for non-MF PCL and provides excellent local control of plaques. Our findings also extend the IPI as prognostic for overall survival for this rare disease. Bulky lesions greater than 10cm in any one dimension are more strongly correlated with relapse.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4421-4421
Author(s):  
Ji Hyun Park ◽  
Dok Hyun Yoon ◽  
Shin Kim ◽  
Jung Sun Park ◽  
Sang-wook Lee ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Although several previous studies addressed the role of radiation in treating localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), chemotherapy alone has shown promising efficacy with the emergence of Rituximab. Thus, we evaluated the clinical efficacy outcomes and failure patterns of patients with localized DLBCL according to two different treatment strategies, either 6 or more cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy alone or 3 or 4 cycles of R-CHOP followed by involved field radiotherapy (IFRT). Methods A prospectively collected database from 21 tertiary centers participating the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL), built up for PROCESS study (NCT01202448) for secondary central nervous system involvement in DLBCL, was recruited for current study in addition to the Asan Medical Center (AMC) Lymphoma Registry. CISL database and AMC lymphoma registry consisted of data from patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL between August 2010 and August 2012, and between February 2004 and February 2012, respectively. Inclusion criteria were localized (stage I or II), non-bulky (<10cm in longest diameter) DLBCL treated with R-CHOP as 1st line chemotherapy, and patients either who received 6 or more cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy only (R-CHOP alone group) or received 3 or 4 cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy followed by IFRT (R-CHOP plus RT group). Comparisons of clinicopathologic parameters, clinical outcomes and the patterns of relapse were performed between two groups. The types of relapse were classified as either locoregional or distant, according to whether it involves any separate region from primary sites. Efficacy outcomes included complete response (CR) rate, 2-year overall survival (OS) rate, and 2-year event-free survival (EFS) rate. Results A total of 357 patients (CISL prospective cohort: 161 patients, AMC registry: 196 patients) were eligible for the analyses. Two hundred ninety nine patients (83.5%) received 6 or more cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy alone, and 58 patients (16.2%) underwent 3 or 4 cycles of R-CHOP followed by IFRT. Median age was 54 years (range, 16-87). During the median follow-up of 24 months (range, 4-116 months), 35 patients (9.8%) experienced relapse, and 22 patients (6.1%) died. Two-year OS and EFS rate was 94.7% and 89.9%, respectively, and 345 out of 357 patients (96.6%) achieved CR. Comparing R-CHOP alone to R-CHOP plus RT group, there was no significant difference in clinicopathologic parameters. R-CHOP alone could achieve significantly higher CR rate of 97.7 % than 91.4% of R-CHOP plus RT group (p = 0.030). Two-year OS and EFS were significantly longer in R-CHOP alone group than R-CHOP plus RT group (96.1 vs 89.9 %, p = 0.029 and 91.7% vs 81.8%, p= 0.028) (Figure 1). Relapse rate was significantly lower in R-CHOP alone group compared with R-CHOP plus RT group than group (7.4% vs 22.4%, p=0.001), and distant relapses were also significantly lower (15.5% vs 2.7%, p<0.001). In addition, even only in relapsed patients, R-CHOP alone group showed lower incidence of distant relapses with marginal statistical significance (36.4% vs 69.2 %, p=0.062) (Table 1). Conclusion In our cohort, R-CHOP alone for six to eight cycles without IFRT could achieve significantly higher 2-year OS and EFS rate as well as CR compared with R-CHOP plus RT group. In addition, the rate of relapse and systemic failure were significantly lower in R-CHOP alone group, which altogether warrant further validation in prospective trial. Table 1. Explorative comparison of overall clinical outcomes and patterns of relapse between two subgroups: patients who underwent six or more cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy alone and who underwent 3 or 4 cycles of R-CHOP followed by IFRT Total (%) R-CHOP alone group (%) R-CHOP plus RT group (%) P -value Number of patients 357 (100) 299 (83.5) 58 (16.2) Treatment response Complete response 345 (96.6) 292 (97.7) 53 (91.4) 0.030 Overall response 351 (98.3) 294 (98.3) 57 (98.3) 1.000 Rate of relapse 35 (9.8%) 14 (7.4) 11 (22.4) < 0.001 Median time to relapse (95% CI) 11 (7-15) 11 (8-14) 10 (5-14) 0.346 Pattern of relapse < 0.001 (0.062) Locoregional 14 (4.7) (63.6) 4 (6.9) (30.8) Distant 8 (2.7) (36.4) 9 (15.5) (69.2) Figure 1. Comparison of overall survival and event-free survival in two subgroups: patients who underwent six or more cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy alone and who underwent 3 or 4 cycles of R-CHOP followed by IFRT Figure 1. Comparison of overall survival and event-free survival in two subgroups: patients who underwent six or more cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy alone and who underwent 3 or 4 cycles of R-CHOP followed by IFRT Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 48-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thai Le Trong ◽  
Toan Le Duy ◽  
Khoi Tran Viet ◽  
Bao Tran Quoc ◽  
Tung Pham Tang ◽  
...  

Background: Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) ranks 10 among the top 15 common cancers worldwide. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of the disease. Despite malignancy, DLBCL is curable and sensitive to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Since first published in 1997, the protocol R-CHOP, a combination of classical chemotherapy CHOP with rituximab, has increased significantly the rate of complete response (CR) and improved overall survival (OS). However, there has been no report of R-CHOP treatment in Hue. Purpose of this research is to evaluate the efficiency of R-CHOP treatment (complete response, progression-free survival) and to describe the toxicities of the protocol. Methods: A retrospective cohort study on 36 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, CD 20 positive treated with R-CHOP at Hue University Hospital between 2011 and 2016. Results: According to the International prognostic index (IPI), 15 patients (41.7%) had low-risk disease, 14 (38.9%) low-to-intermediate risk, 6 (16.7%) high-to-intermediate risk and 1 (2.7%) high-risk disease. After finishing 8 cycles of therapy, 19 patients (52.8%) achieved complete response. Grade III anemia was observed (13.9%), grade III neutropeniain 4 patients (11.1%) and nausea (5.6%). During a 5-year period, progression – free survival was reported for 66.7% of patients and median for survival time was 3.3 years. Conclusions: The addition of rituximab to the CHOP regimen increases the complete-response rate and prolongs progression -free survival in patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. The treatment of R-CHOP is well tolerated that the adverse events are mostly reported at grade III and able to control effectively. Key words: diffuse large B-cell, non-hodgkin lymphoma, CD20 positive, CHOP, rituximab


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18536-18536 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Poddubnaya ◽  
E. Osmanov ◽  
L. Babicheva ◽  
G. Tumyan ◽  
E. Sorokin ◽  
...  

18536 Background: R-CHOP is regarded as the best available treatment for untreated patients with aggressive and indolent B- NHL. Methods: 184 previously untreated patients with DLCL were included in retrospective study: 92 patients were treated by CHOP, 92 patients were treated by CHOP plus rituximab ( R-CHOP ). Age of patients ranged 16–87 years (median 50 years). The median follow- up was 18 months. Compared groups were balanced in all parameters. The advanced stage of disease (III-IV) at diagnosis had 66% patients treated with CHOP and 67,5 % patients treated with R-CHOP. =2 extranodal zones were initially revealed at 35% in CHOP group vs 47% in R- CHOP group. PS of 25 % patients in R-CHOP group and 30% patients in CHOP group was regarded as appropriate 3–4 degrees on ECOG. Increased LDH level was marked at 60% in CHOP-group vs 54% in R-CHOP. 29% patients in R-CHOP group and 21% patients in CHOP group had B-symptoms at diagnosis; bulky disease took place in 53% cases in R-CHOP group and 62% cases in CHOP. High IPI score had 47 % patients in CHOP-group vs 48 % in R-CHOP. Results: Complete response was achieved in 74% of the patients treated with R- CHOP, as compared to 56% of those treated with CHOP alone (p<0,05). Disease progression during treatment was reported in 25% of patients in CHOP group and 18,5% in R-CHOP group. Median overall survival in patients treated with R-CHOP was NS, in patients treated with CHOP alone was 16 months. With a median follow-up of 18 months, 29 (31,5%) events (progression - 18,5%, relapse - 10%, death - 3% ) were observed in the R-CHOP group and 48 (52%) events ( progression - 25%, relapse - 20%, death - 7%) in the CHOP group (p<0,05). Median event-free survival and relapse-free survival in the CHOP group was 12 months, in R-CHOP group NS. Toxicity was equivalent in both groups. Conclusions: We have established better direct efficiency and outcome of R-CHOP in any age of pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3104-3104
Author(s):  
Fernando Arias-Mendoza ◽  
Geoffrey Payne ◽  
Kristen Zakian ◽  
Marion Stubbs ◽  
Hamed Mojahed ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3104 Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common sub-type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.1 DLBCL is a heterogeneous, clinically aggressive disease, which has recently been sub-categorized based upon gene expression profiling. The prognosis of patients with DLBCL is presently assessed by the International Prognostic Index (IPI), which predicts estimated five-year survival based on clinical criteria.1,2 Over the past decade, a number of reports have established that the intra-tumoral content of the phospholipid-related metabolites phosphoethanolamine and phosphocholine (Etn-P and Cho-P) is increased in clinically aggressive malignant disease, and decreases when the malignancy responds to anticancer treatment. These data suggest that phospholipid metabolism is an intrinsic part of the disease process.3,4 Based on these observations, we hypothesized that intra-tumor levels of Etn-P and Cho-P may be a reliable predictive biomarker for therapeutic outcome in aggressive malignant diseases. To test this hypothesis, we measured noninvasively the tumor content of the sum of Etn-P plus Cho-P normalized by the tumor content of nucleoside triphosphates ([Etn-P+Cho-P]/NTP) in patients with DLBCL prior to initiating therapy. These data show that the pretreatment metabolic ratio (PMR) of [Etn-P+Cho-P]/NTP, is a potentially valuable biomarker of outcome, which identifies a subset of DLBCL patients likely to experience early failure to standard therapy, and for whom alternatives to therapy should be considered. Methods: Under ethical review board approval, 27 previously untreated DLBCL patients prior to receiving standard doxorubicin-based therapy were studied noninvasively using 3D localized, 1H-decoupled, nuclear Overhauser-enhanced phosphorus MR spectroscopy at 1.5 T. Result: As only complete response (CR) is clinically meaningful in achieving durable remissions of DLBCL, we divided these patients by response at six months into CR and all the other responses (not complete response, NCR). In the 17 CR patients, the PMR was significantly lower than in the ten NCR patients (PMR mean ± 95% CI, 1.46 ± 0.21 vs. 2.47 ± 0.24, p < 3 × 10-6). The prediction of response using a Fisher test was significant for the PMR alone (p < 1 × 10-4; sensitivity of 1.00, specificity of 0.70) and improved further when combined with the IPI (p < 2 × 10-6; sensitivity of 1.0, specificity of 0.90). The progression-free survival (PFS) strongly correlated with the PMR alone (p < 4 × 10-8) and with the PMR and IPI as covariates (p < 1 × 10-7) by the Cox regression model. Using the Kaplan-Meier model, the PMR discriminated 64% of patients with PFS below 11 months (p < 1 × 10-7), while as covariate with the IPI it discriminated 82% of these patients (p < 2 × 10-7). Discussion: Our results show that the PMR contains information that predicts outcome to standard therapy in DLBCL patients. This prediction improves when the PMR is combined with the IPI. While the PME alone identifies 64% of those patients who will go on to show an extremely poor response with a progression-free survival below 11 months, the combination of the PME and IPI identify 82% of these patients. In conclusion, we have successfully demonstrated that the PMR can be an important determinant in predicting response to treatment in patients with DLBCL, especially when integrated with the IPI. References: 1) Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2001; 2) Smith MR, Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. St. Louis, MO, Mosby, 1966; 3) Arias-Mendoza F, Brown TR, Dis. Markers, 2003;19:49-68; 4)Griffiths JR, et al, Lancet 1983;1:1435-6 Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 638-645
Author(s):  
Tamer A. Elbedewy ◽  
Hossam Eldin A. Elashtokhy ◽  
Sherief Abd-Elsalam ◽  
Marwa A. Suliman

Background: Egypt is one of the highest hepatitis C virus (HCV) endemic areas. Chronic HCV infection has extra-hepatic manifestations, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is commonly associated with HCV infection. The prognostic value of HCV infection and HCV treatment in patients with DLBCL remains unclear until now. Objective: The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of HCV infection and HCV treatment as independent prognostic factors on the event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in Egyptian patients with HCV associated DLBCL. Methods: This study included 353 patients with DLBCL, collected retrospectively. While 34 patients with HCV who received HCV antiviral therapy were collected prospectively. Patient’s characteristics were collected from the patient records at the time of diagnosis. The status of the patients about HCV infection and HCV treatment were also recorded. Disease progression, relapse, retreatment or deaths were also verified through medical records. EFS and OS were calculated. Results: EFS and OS significantly decrease in HCV infected and HCV non-treated patients when compared with HCV non-infected and HCV treated patients, respectively. HCV infection but not HCV treatment was independently associated with EFS and OS using univariate and multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Hepatitis C virus infection is an independent prognostic factor for EFS and OS in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. HCV treatment is associated with higher EFS and OS but can not be considered as an independent prognostic factor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document