Phase 1 Trial of Human IL-15 (rhIL-15) and Obinutuzumab for Relapsed and Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Background: Of the several drugs and drug combinations approved for treatment of relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the reported complete response rates are no greater than 30%. Obinutuzumab is a glycoengineered, humanized type 2 anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody thought to engage the immune system by directly activating antibody- dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC); it is approved for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in combination with chlorambucil. The key mediators of ADCC are polymorphonuclear neutrophils, monocytes, and natural killer (NK) cells. Recombinant human Interleukin-15 (rhIL-15) is a stimulatory cytokine that promotes the differentiation and activation of NK cells, monocytes, and long-term CD8+ memory T-cells. In a Phase I trial, administration of rhIL-15 as a 5-day continuous intravenous infusion (civ) was associated with up to 45-fold increase in the number of NK cells at well- tolerated dose levels. Preclinical murine lymphoid malignancy models have shown increased efficacy of monoclonal antibodies when administered together with rhIL-15; BL/6 mice inoculated with EL4-CD20 cells (a syngeneic lymphoma line); including significant prolongation of survival with the IL-15/Rituximab combination compared to either drug given as single agent (90% v. 30% alive at 75 days). We hypothesized that rhIL-15-associated increase in NK cell number and activity would improve efficacy of obinutuzumab in treatment of relapsed and refractory CLL, and would increase the duration and depth of response; this phase I trial is testing the safety of the combination. Primary objective: determine the safety, toxicity profile, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of civ rhIL-15 administration in combination with obinutuzumab treatment Secondary objectives: 1) evaluate the potential antitumor activity of the combination of rhIL-15 and obinutuzumab by assessing the clinical response rate, minimal residual disease (MRD) status, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients with relapsed and refractory CLL; 2) define the effects of rhIL-15 on the ADCC mediated by obinutuzumab using ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs); 3) characterize the biological effects of rhIL-15 administered with obinutuzumab on the percentages and absolute numbers of circulating lymphocytes (T and NK cells) and the T- cell subsets (including naïve, central, and effector memory subsets) by flow cytometry Exploratory objectives: identify biomarkers predictive of response to rhIL-15 and obinutuzumab treatment, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and baseline cytokine levels Eligibility criteria: 1) age ≥ 18 years; 2) ECOG ≤ 1; 3) Diagnosis of CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) with ≥ 50% of B cells expressing CD20; 4) measurable or evaluable disease that is refractory or relapsed following therapy with a BTK inhibitor OR have relapsed/refractory CLL and are intolerant to BTK inhibitor therapy; patients with del(17p) must also be refractory or relapsed after, or intolerant to, therapy with venetoclax; 5) adequate organ function parameters as defined within the protocol; 6) active disease requiring treatment, as defined within the protocol. Study design: a single institution non-randomized phase I dose escalation study evaluating increasing doses of civ rhIL-15 in combination with obinutuzumab using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design. On days 1-5 of each 4-week cycle, rhIL-15 will be administered by civ at dose levels 0.5, 1, and 2 mcg/kg/day. During the first cycle, obinutuzumab will be administered at a dose of 100 mg by IV on day 4, 900 mg on day 5, 1,000 mg on day 11, and 1,000 mg on day 18; then 1,000 mg on day 4 of each subsequent cycle. Infusion reaction, antimicrobial, and tumor lysis syndrome prophylaxis will be administered per manufacturer's recommendations. Treatment will continue up to 6 cycles, or until unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease. Up to 24 patients will be enrolled in the study. Correlative studies: 1) optional lymph node biopsy at baseline and after the first week of treatment (C1D8) for tissue immune cell subsets and quantifying antibody penetration; 2) lymphocyte subset testing, ctDNA, and cell and plasma banking on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of cycle 1, and days 1 and 8 of cycles 2-6; 3) ADCC capacity of ex vivo NK cells on C1D1, 4, and 8. One patient has started treatment to date. Enrollment is ongoing. Figure Disclosures Wiestner: Acerta: Research Funding; Pharmayclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Nurix: Research Funding. Waldmann:Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Subcutaneous Epcoritamab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Preliminary Results from the Epcore CLL-1 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146563 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2627-2627

Author(s):

Arnon P. Kater ◽

Jacob Haaber Christensen ◽

Hans Herluf Bentzen ◽

Carsten Utoft Niemann ◽

Martin Hutchings ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Injection Site Reaction ◽

Steering Committee ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Site Reaction ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Background: Small molecules such as Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitors have transformed the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, such treatments are not curative, and patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL following multiple targeted treatments present an emergent challenge with very limited therapeutic options. In addition, success rates of autologous T-cell-based therapies in CLL have been disappointing. In vitro data in CLL cells suggest potentially high efficacy of bispecific T-cell engagers (Martens et al, J Immunother Cancer 2020), but clinical data are extremely limited. Epcoritamab (GEN3013; DuoBody ®-CD3×CD20) is a bispecific antibody that can induce potent activation and cytotoxic activity of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to specifically eliminate CD20-expressing cells (van der Horst et al, Blood Cancer J 2021). In the first-in-human trial in R/R B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL; EPCORE NHL-1; NCT03625037), epcoritamab showed manageable safety and meaningful antitumor activity across a range of aggressive and indolent B-NHLs. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia (69%), cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 59%), and injection-site reaction (47%); CRS events were all grade 1-2 and most occurred in cycle 1 (Clausen et al, J Clin Oncol 2021). However, as CLL is characterized by presence of (high numbers of) circulating tumor cells, acquired T-cell dysfunction, and variable expression of CD20, data obtained in B-NHL are difficult to extrapolate to CLL. Herein we present the first results from the dose-escalation part of a phase 1b/2 trial evaluating epcoritamab in pts with R/R CLL. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 trial, toxicity and efficacy of epcoritamab are investigated in adults with R/R CLL (EPCORE CLL-1; NCT04623541). Eligible pts previously received ≥2 lines of systemic antineoplastic therapy, including treatment with (or intolerance to) a BTK inhibitor. Epcoritamab is subcutaneously administered via 1-mL injections in 4-week cycles as follows: once weekly in cycles 1-3, every 2 weeks in cycles 4-9, and monthly in cycles ≥10 until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Step-up dosing during cycle 1 (ie, priming dose followed by an intermediate dose, then full doses) is used in combination with steroid prophylaxis to reduce the risk of CRS. In the dose-escalation part, pts with R/R CLL received epcoritamab at 2 full-dose levels (24 and 48 mg) according to a modified 3+3 design. Primary end points of the dose-escalation part included dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first 28-day treatment cycle and the incidence and severity of AEs, CRS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Results: The first pt was enrolled on November 30, 2020. As of July 12, 2021, 7 pts with R/R CLL received epcoritamab subcutaneously administered at 2 full-dose levels: 24 mg (n=3) and 48 mg (n=4). Six pts completed the DLT evaluation period, and 5 pts had a full response assessment. Pts had received a median of 4 lines of prior therapy (range, 2-5). Six of 7 pts had poor-risk features of del(17p), TP53 mutations, or both. Three of 7 pts had bulky disease. No DLTs occurred at 24 or 48 mg. The most common treatment-emergent AEs (>30%) were CRS (100%), fatigue (71%), injection-site reaction (43%), and nausea (43%). All pts experienced CRS in the first cycle, but no CRS events were higher than grade 2. No cases of ICANS were observed. TLS was not observed. Antileukemic activity has been observed at both dose levels, with partial responses in 3 of 5 pts. Updated clinical and pharmacokinetic data, including data for additional pts treated with epcoritamab, will be presented. Conclusions: These data suggest that epcoritamab is well tolerated in pts with R/R CLL at dose levels up to 48 mg and has clinical activity in pts with high-risk features. The expansion part of this study in pts with R/R CLL and Richter syndrome will open later this year. Disclosures Kater: Janssen, AstraZeneca: Other: Ad Board, steering committee, Research Funding; BMS, Roche/Genentech: Other: Ad Board, , Research Funding; Genmab, LAVA: Other: Ad Board, Steering Committee; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Ad Board, Research Funding. Niemann: CSL Behring, Genmab, Takeda, Octapharma: Consultancy; Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk Foundation: Research Funding. Hutchings: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Chen: Genmab: Current Employment. Rios: Genmab: Current Employment. Palenski: AbbVie: Current Employment. Li: Genmab: Current Employment. Mato: AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSKCC: Current Employment; Genmab: Research Funding; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; LOXO: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nurix: Research Funding; DTRM BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: DSMB, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

An Open-Label, Phase Ib Study of Duvelisib (IPI-145) in Combination with Bendamustine, Rituximab or Bendamustine/Rituximab in Select Subjects with Lymphoma or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4422.4422 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4422-4422 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Ian Flinn ◽

Manish R. Patel ◽

Michael B Maris ◽

Jeffrey Matous ◽

Mohamad Cherry ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Treatment Delay ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Open Label ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Duvelisib is a potent inhibitor of the δ and γ isoforms of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) being developed as a potential therapeutic in hematologic malignancies including B and T cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In a phase I study of single agent duvelisib (D), ORR of 52% was seen in pts with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (iNHL) and 47% in CLL. Bendamustine (B), rituximab (R), and their combination have demonstrated proven activity in iNHL and CLL. Combining duvelisib with either bendamustine or rituximab alone or in combination with each other may improve response rates and the durability of remission. The goal of this Phase 1b, open-label, three-arm, non-randomized, dose escalating, safety and tolerability trial is to characterize the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary efficacy profile of duvelisib given in combination with rituximab (Arm 1-DR), bendamustine plus rituximab (Arm 2-DBR) or bendamustine (Arm 3-DB) in subjects with select relapsed/refractory lymphoma or CLL. Methods: Pts had relapsed CLL or NHL, ECOG performance status (PS) ≤2, and adequate organ function. The subject population during dose escalation was limited to relapsed NHL. During the dose expansion phase, each treatment arm enrolled to population specific cohorts to continue to assess efficacy. Arm 1 (DR) received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Arm 2 (DBR)received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles, bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Arm 3 (DB) received bendamustine 120 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Three different dose levels of duvelisib were explored, 25, 50, and 75 mg PO BID. DLTs were defined as: febrile neutropenia, G4 neutropenia ≥7 days, G4 thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days or G3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, Grade 4 AST/ALT, Grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia ≥7 days, ≥ Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity ≥7 days (excluding alopecia), Treatment delay of ≥7 days due to unresolved toxicity that prevents re-dosing, hepatocellular injury (defined as ALT>2 x ULN and (ALT/ULN)/(ALP/ULN) >5) and bilirubin >2 x ULN or jaundice ± alkaline phosphatase <2 x ULN. Patients were evaluated for response every 3 cycles according to specific criteria for their disease. Results: Between August 2013 and May 2014, 32 pts, median age 66 years (44-78) were enrolled to the study, 12 NHL pts on the dose escalation portion and 20 pts on dose expansion (13 CLL, 7 NHL). Patients had a median of 4 prior therapies (1-11). In arms 1 (DR) and 2 (DBR), no dose limiting toxicities were seen at the highest dose level of duvelisib (75 mg bid). In arm 3 (DB) in which a higher dose of bendamustine is used 1 pt developed a DLT at the 50 mg BID dose level of duvelisib (febrile neutropenia, neutropenia ≥ 7 days, thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days, and liver toxicities which resulted in a treatment delay of ≥ 7 days). Dose escalation continues in this arm as the MTD has not reached. Patients on the dose expansion portion of the study are receiving duvelisib at 25 mg BID due to emerging data of duvelisib monotherapy showing no advantage in doses greater than 25 mg BID in these histologies. The AE profile is consistent with the toxicities of the single agents. The most common AEs > grade 3 were neutropenia (28% overall; [Arm 1 (DR), 27%]; [Arm 2 (DBR), 38%]), and rash (16% overall; [Arm 1, 14%]; [Arm 2, 25%]). Grade 3 or higher AST/ALT increases were seen in 2 out of 12 patients on Arm 1, 2 out of 8 patients on Arm 2 and no patients on Arm 3. There have been 2 deaths (cardiac arrest and pneumonia), both on Arm 1. Twenty one pts were evaluable for response with an ORR of 81% (10% CR, 71% PR, 14% SD and 5% PD). With a median follow up of 4.0 months, time to event analyses are immature. However, Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS at 3 months is 87%. PK analysis is consistent with the monotherapy Phase I trial of duvelisib. Conclusions: Initial early analysis of duvelisib administered in combination with bendamustine and rituximab suggests these combinations to be generally well-tolerated with encouraging. Further follow-up is required to better characterize response rates and durability of remissions. Disclosures Flinn: Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Matous:Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I Trial of Targeted Alpha-Particle Immunotherapy with Actinium-225 (225Ac)-Lintuzumab (Anti-CD33) and Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) in Older Patients with Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3794.3794 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3794-3794 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Joseph G. Jurcic ◽

Farhad Ravandi ◽

John M. Pagel ◽

Jae H. Park ◽

B. Douglas Smith ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Older Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Background: The use of short-ranged (50-80 µm), high-energy (~100 keV/µm) α particle-emitting isotopes for radioimmunotherapy may result in more specific tumor cell kill and less damage to normal tissues than β-emitters. 225Ac-lintuzumab consists of a radiometal that emits four α-particles linked to an anti-CD33 antibody. A phase I trial showed that 225Ac-lintuzumab is safe at doses ≤ 3 µCi/kg and has anti-tumor activity against relapsed/refractory AML across all dose levels studied (Jurcic et al. ASH, 2011). We are conducting a multicenter, phase I dose-escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and biological activity of fractionated-dose 225Ac-lintuzumab in combination with LDAC. Patients and Methods: Patients ≥ 60 years with untreated AML not suitable for standard induction chemotherapy (e.g., antecedent hematologic disorder, unfavorable cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities, and significant comorbidities) were eligible. Patients received LDAC 20 mg twice daily for 10 days every 4-6 weeks for up to 12 cycles. During Cycle 1, two fractions of 225Ac-lintuzumab were given one week apart, beginning 4-7 days following completion of LDAC. To prevent radiation-induced nephrotoxicity, patients were given furosemide while receiving 225Ac-lintuzumab and spironolactone for one year afterward. 225Ac doses were escalated using a 3+3 design. Four dose levels were studied with a total accrual of up to 24 patients. In planned analyses, dose escalation proceeded if < 33% of patients in a cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Results: Fourteen patients (median age, 77 years; range, 68-87 years) completed therapy. An additional patient received only one of two planned fractions of 225Ac-lintuzumab due to technical issues and is excluded from analysis. Nine (64%) had prior myelodysplastic syndrome, for which seven received prior therapy with hypomethylating agents (n=6) or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (n=1). One patient (7%) had chronic myeloid leukemia in molecular remission prior to development of AML. Nine patients (64%) had intermediate-risk and five (36%) had unfavorable cytogenetics. Median CD33 expression was 81% (range, 45-100%). 225Ac-lintuzumab was given at 0.5 (n=3), 1 (n=6), 1.5 (n=3), or 2 (n=2) μCi/kg/fraction. Up to 4 cycles of LDAC were administered. DLT was seen in one patient at 1 µCi/kg/fraction who had grade 4 thrombocytopenia with marrow aplasia for more than 6 weeks following therapy. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia (n=4) and thrombocytopenia (n=6). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included febrile neutropenia (n=7), pneumonia (n=4), bacteremia (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), transient creatinine increase (n=1), hypokalemia (n=1), rectal hemorrhage (n=1), and generalized weakness (n=2). Eight of 11 patients (73%) evaluated after Cycle 1 had bone marrow blast reductions (mean reduction, 72%; range, 34-100%). Seven (64%) had blast reductions of at least 50%. Objective responses (1 CR, 1 CRp, 2 CRi) were seen in four of the 14 patients (29%) after one cycle of therapy (Table 1). Responses were seen only at doses ≥ 1 µCi/kg/fraction (4 of 11 patients, 36%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.7 months (range, 1.7-16.9 months). Median overall survival (OS) was 5.5 months (range, 2.2-24 months). Conclusions: Fractionated-dose 225Ac-linutuzmab can be safely combined with LDAC and produce remission in older patients with untreated AML. Dose escalation continues to define the MTD. Additional patients will be treated at the MTD in the phase II portion of this trial to determine response rate, PFS, and OS. Table 1. Objective Responses Response Dose Level (μCi/kg/fraction) Total (n=14) 0.5 (n=3) 1 (n=6) 1.5 (n=3) 2 (n=2) CR 0 0 1 (33%) 0 1 (7%) CRp 0 0 0 1 (50%) 1 (7%) CRi 0 1 (17%) 1 (33%) 0 2 (14%) Overall Response 0 1 (17%) 2 (67%) 1 (50%) 4 (29%) Abbreviations: CR, complete remission; CRp, CR with incomplete platelet recovery; CRi, CR with incomplete count recovery. Disclosures Jurcic: Ambit Biosciences: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma US, Invc.: Research Funding; Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; Bayer Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Merck and Co.: Consultancy; Celgene Corp.: Research Funding; Actrinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ac-225-lintuzumab is an investigational agent being developed for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.. Pagel:Actinium Pharmacetuicals, Inc.: Equity Ownership. Park:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy. Levy:Takeda: Consultancy. Perl:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Earle:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Cicic:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Scheinberg:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.

Download Full-text

Navitoclax (ABT-263) Plus Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR) or Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR): A Phase 1 Study In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2455.2455 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2455-2455 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Thomas J. Kipps ◽

William G. Wierda ◽

Jeffrey A. Jones ◽

Lode J. Swinnen ◽

Jianning Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Abstract 2455 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263), a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule, binds with high affinity (Ki ≤1nM) to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w, promoting apoptosis. In vitro, navitoclax shows potent targeted cytotoxicity (EC50 ≤ 1μM) against T and B lymphoid malignancies that over-express Bcl-2. A phase 1 trial demonstrated oral navitoclax monotherapy to be well-tolerated and to have anti-tumor activity in patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, thrombocytopenia (TCP) was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Phase 3 studies showed improved outcomes in CLL pts with the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) combination, and a phase 2 trial showed bendamustine/rituximab (BR) to be effective for pts with relapsed or refractory CLL. Navitoclax enhanced R (monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy) efficacy in preclinical models of B-cell lymphoma. Methods: This is an ongoing, international, phase 1 dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral navitoclax in combination with FCR (Arm A) or BR (Arm B) in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL. Secondary objectives are efficacy endpoints (PFS, ORR, TTP, OS, duration of response). Eligible pts had measurable disease, ECOG performance score ≤1, ANC ≥100/μL, platelets ≥100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL. Preliminary results are reported. After obtaining informed consent, pts were assigned to Arm A or Arm B based on physician preference, each consisting of 28-day dose-escalation cycles with once-daily, pre-infusion, navitoclax treatment on Days 3–5 of Cycle 1 and Days 1–3 of subsequent cycles. In both arms, R was 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of Cycle 1; and 500 mg/m2 on Day 2 of Cycle 2 and on Day 1 of subsequent cycles. In Arm A, F 25 mg/m2 and C 175 mg/m2 were dosed on Days 2–4 in Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1–3 in subsequent cycles. In Arm B, B was dosed at 70 mg/m2 on Days 2 and 3 of Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1 and 2 in subsequent cycles. Navitoclax starting dose was 110 mg daily. Dose escalation to the next cohort (200 mg) was according to a continuous reassessment model. Tumor responses were evaluated using NCI-WG 1996 criteria. Pts could continue on navitoclax therapy for 1 yr in the absence of progressive disease or significant toxicity. Results: As of July 2010, 7 pts enrolled in the initially prioritized Arm B (BR+navitoclax); all completed the first cohort of 110 mg (median age 60 yr [range 55–72]). Study sites are currently enrolling pts in Arm A (FCR+navitoclax); 2 pts have enrolled to date. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–7). One pt had a DLT of elevated AST (Arm B, 110 mg cohort) and 1 pt had a DLT of neutropenic fever (Arm A, 110 mg cohort). In Arm B, neither TCP nor neutropenia have been DLTs. For the 7 pts with navitoclax-related AEs, the most common were diarrhea (3 pts), nausea (5 pts), and fatigue (3 pts). Seven pts remain on study; 2 pts discontinued due to disease progression and 2 withdrew per physician preference. In Arm B, preliminary antitumor best responses were assessable in 4 pts who received 2 cycles; 1 CRi in a pt with del17p- (based on lymph node [LN] response and no morphologic evidence of CLL in the bone marrow), 2 unconfirmed CRs (based on LN response and no bone marrow at this time), and 1 PR in a pt with del17p- (this pt subsequently received an allogeneic stem cell transplant). Preliminary PK results for the Arm B 110 mg cohort indicated that navitoclax PK was similar in Cycle 1 (navitoclax+BR) and Cycle 2 (navitoclax alone), and appeared comparable to PK in the navitoclax monotherapy study. Conclusions: Early results show that the combination of navitoclax with BR is well-tolerated, without DLTs of TCP or neutropenia, and show evidence of anti-tumor activity. Data are limited in the FCR portion of the study. The maximum tolerated dose of navitoclax has not been reached. Accrual is ongoing and following completion of the dose-escalation components of this study, expanded cohorts of pts will be assessed using the recommended phase 2 dose of navitoclax to further assess the tolerability and dose, and to continue to explore for efficacy signals in combinations. Preliminary data in combination with BR are encouraging. Disclosures: Kipps: Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding. Wierda: Abbott: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jones: Glaxo Smith-Kline: Consultancy; Abbott: Research Funding. Swinnen: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Yang: Abbott: Employment. Cui: Abbott: Employment. Busman: Abbott: Employment. Krivoshik: Abbott: Employment. Enschede: Abbott: Employment. Humerickhouse: Abbott: Employment.

Download Full-text

Clinical Safety and Activity in a Phase 1 Trial of IPI-145, a Potent Inhibitor of Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase-δ,γ, in Patients with Advanced Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3663.3663 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3663-3663 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Steven M. Horwitz ◽

Manish Patel ◽

Anas Younes ◽

James R. Porter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Expansion Cohort ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3663 Introduction: Phosphoinositide-3-kinases (PI3Ks) play pivotal roles in cell signaling and regulate a variety of cellular functions relevant to oncogenesis. Impaired development and function of B and T lymphocytes has been demonstrated in PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ isoform knockout mice, supporting the development of PI3K-δ,γ specific inhibitors for B- and T-cell lymphoid malignancies. IPI-145 is a potent PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor in clinical development for patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies. The activity of IPI-145 via PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ isoform inhibition has been characterized in biochemical and cellular assays and demonstrated in preclinical models of B- and T-cell mediated disease. Early results of the Phase 1 study in pts with advanced hematologic malignancies are reported here. Methods and Patients: This Phase 1 dose-escalation study is designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and activity of orally administered IPI-145 in pts with advanced hematologic malignancies, including T-cell lymphomas/leukemias. Sequential cohorts of pts are enrolled at progressively higher dose levels with expansion cohorts of pts with select hematologic malignancies. IPI-145 is administered orally 2 times per day (BID) continuously in 28-day cycles. Tumor response is evaluated based on disease-specific standard criteria. Results: As of 16 July 2012, the study had enrolled 20 pts; 5 pts with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL), 4 with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL), 3 with aggressive B-cell NHL [including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) n=2 and Richter's transformation n=1], 3 with multiple myeloma (MM), 2 with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), 2 with T-cell lymphoma [anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) n=2] and 1 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Of these pts, 11 are male and 9 female, with a median [range] age of 63 years [30–81], with 36% <6 month from most recent prior systemic therapy. The median [range] number of prior therapies was 3 [1–8]. IPI-145 doses administered include 8 mg BID (n=1), 15 mg BID (n=6), 25 mg BID (n=7), 35 mg BID (n=3), and 50 mg BID (n=3). The median [range] number of treatment cycles was 2 [1–8], with 12 (60%) pts continuing on treatment. Adverse events (AEs) have occurred in 13 (65%) pts, including 7 (35%) pts with AEs Grade ≥3. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 11 pts (55%) with Grade ≥3 occurring in 5 pts (25%). Grade 4 neutropenia was the one dose limiting toxicity observed to date (15 mg dose cohort). New Grade ≥3 hematological laboratory abnormalities included neutropenia [n= 6 (30%)] and thrombocytopenia [n= 1 (5%)]. Grade 3 ALT/AST elevations occurred in 1 (5%) MM pt with onset 6 weeks after IPI-145 initiation. Preliminary PK show dose-proportional increases in plasma Cmax and AUC over the dose range studied. Further, the PK and initial pharmacodynamic (PD) data from the first 3 cohorts (8–25 mg BID) predict continuous suppression of the PI3K-δ pathway with increasing inhibition of the PI3K-γ pathway with a 25 mg BID dose or greater. In the evaluable pts (n=11), responses were observed at the 8, 15, and 25 mg BID dose levels including 2/3 CLL/SLL pts (0 CR/2 PR/1 SD), 1/2 iNHL pts (1 CR/0 PR/1 SD), and 1/1 in MCL (1 PR). No responses have been observed to date in evaluable pts with MM (0/3) or aggressive NHL (0/2). All pts with at least SD after 2 cycles (n=6) remain on treatment including the first pt dosed. Based on the PK/PD and the preliminary activity observed in pts with CLL, iNHL and MCL, an expansion cohort is enrolling pts in these select hematologic diseases dosed at 25 mg BID to further evaluate the safety and preliminary activity of IPI-145. Dose escalation continues with a focus on pts with T-cell malignancies and DLBCL where increasing suppression of the PI3K-γ isoform may improve the efficacy profile. Additional expansion cohorts in T-cell lymphoma, DLBCL, myeloproliferative neoplasms and the acute leukemias will better define disease specific activity. Conclusions: IPI-145, an oral, potent PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, appears to be well tolerated and has shown initial clinical activity in pts with iNHL, MCL, and CLL. A dose of 25 mg BID effectively inhibits PI3K-δ, providing a rationale for expansion in CLL/iNHL/MCL. Additional safety and efficacy data from the ongoing dose escalation evaluation in T-cell/aggressive NHL and the CLL/iNHL/MCL expansion cohort will be presented. Disclosures: Flinn: Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Horwitz:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allos: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding. Patel:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding. Younes:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Research Funding; MIllenium: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Porter:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Sweeney:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Allen:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Kelly:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Kahl:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase I Trial of the Pan-PI3K Inhibitor Pilaralisib (SAR245408/XL147) in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) or Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma

Clinical Cancer Research ◽

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-3262 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 21 (14) ◽

pp. 3160-3169 ◽

Cited By ~ 39

Author(s):

Jennifer R. Brown ◽

Matthew S. Davids ◽

Jordi Rodon ◽

Pau Abrisqueta ◽

Siddha N. Kasar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Phase I ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Pi3k Inhibitor ◽

Refractory Lymphoma

Download Full-text

A Phase I Trial of the Antibody-Cytokine Fusion Protein F16IL2 in Combination with Anti-CD33 Immunotherapy for Posttransplant AML Relapse

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-145859 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2345-2345

Author(s):

Andrew F. Berdel ◽

Christoph Rollig ◽

Martin Wermke ◽

Linus Angenendt ◽

Leo Ruhnke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Fusion Protein ◽

Nk Cells ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Human Antibody ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Introduction Natural killer (NK) cells are key effectors in cancer immunosurveillance and posttransplant immunity, but shortage of environmental growth factors and deficient recognition of malignant cells may limit their anticancer efficacy. We hypothesized that the antibody-mediated anchoring of interleukin-2 (IL-2) to the leukemia-modified extracellular matrix (ECM) would increase NK cell abundance and activity to potentiate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts. In this novel-novel combination dose-escalation phase 1 trial, we enrolled patients with AML relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary activity of F16IL2, an antibody-cytokine fusion protein composed of the human antibody fragment scFv(F16) in diabody format and two molecules of human IL-2, in combination with the Fc-optimized, ADCC-mediating anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody BI 836858. F16 specifically targets the A1 domain of the ECM protein tenascin C (TnC), which is spliced into the TnC molecule during active angiogenesis and tissue remodeling while it is virtually absent in normal tissues. Methods F16IL2 (10 - 20 Mio IU IV) was administered on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of 28-day cycles, followed by administration of BI 836858 (10 - 40 mg IV) two days after each F16IL2 infusion. Dose escalation was performed over 4 dose levels (DL). Cohort 1 (10 Mio IU F16IL2 and 10 mg BI 836858, n = 5), cohort 2 (10 Mio IU F16IL2 and 20 mg BI 836858, n = 3), cohort 3 (20 Mio IU F16IL2 and 20 mg BI 836858, n = 4), cohort 4 (20 Mio IU F16IL2 and 40 mg BI 836858, n = 3). Safety and tolerability, pharmacodynamics and -kinetics, clinical efficacy and immune effector cell dynamics were investigated. This trial was registered at EudraCT as #2015-004763-37. Results Between December 2016 and March 2020, 15 patients with a median age of 50 years (range, 20 - 68) were enrolled and treated across 4 dose levels. Six patients (40%) had received two or more prior HSCT. The most frequent drug-related AEs (F16IL2 or BI 836858 or combination) were pyrexia (n = 13, 87%), chills (n = 12, 80%) and infusion-related reactions (n = 9, 60%), consistent with the expected toxicity profile of cytokine-armed or naked mAbs. These events were generally manageable, transient and of grade ≤ 2. One dose-limiting toxicity occurred at each of DL 3 (pulmonary edema) and 4 (acute GVHD). No patient died within the first 30 days of treatment initiation. Whereas no formal maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached, the maximum tested dose of 20 Mio IU F16IL2 and 40 mg BI 836858 was considered the recommended dose (RD). Three objective responses (1 CR, 1 CRi, 1 PR in extramedullary AML) were observed among 7 patients treated at the two higher DL, whereas no responses occurred at the two starting DL. Median OS among all 15 patients was 4.8 months (1.5 - 12.9), with a 6- and 12-month OS of 40% and 27%, respectively. Among those 7 patients whose AML was at least temporarily controlled with study treatment (CR/CRi, PR, SD), 12-month OS was 67% vs. 0% in non-responders. Combination therapy stimulated the expansion and activation of NK cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating that the strategy of potentiating ADCC with tumor-targeted immunocytokines is feasible in humans. In the difficult-to-treat situation of posttransplant AML relapse, responses were observed at higher DL, even in patients with extramedullary disease. The antibody-mediated targeted delivery of IL-2 to the ECM combined with anti-CD33 immunotherapy represents an innovative experimental approach associated with acceptable safety and encouraging biologic and clinical activity in posttransplant AML relapse. Disclosures Wermke: Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hemmerle: Philogen S.p.A.: Current Employment. Schäfers: Philogen S.p.A.: Research Funding. Rossig: BMS and Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; AdBoards by Amgen: Honoraria. Stelljes: Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Medac: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Rueter: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG: Current Employment. Neri: Philogen S.p.A.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: Multiple patents on vascular targeting; ETH Zurich: Patents & Royalties: CD117xCD3 TEA. Berdel: Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schliemann: Roche: Consultancy; Philogen S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel grants; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grants.

Download Full-text

Phase I Trial of Targeted Alpha-Particle Therapy Using Actinium-225 (225Ac)-Lintuzumab (Anti-CD33) in Combination with Low-Dose Cytarabine (LDAC) for Older Patients with Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5293.5293 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5293-5293 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Joseph G Jurcic ◽

Farhad Ravandi ◽

John M. Pagel ◽

Jae H Park ◽

B. Douglas Smith ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Particle Therapy ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Molecular Abnormalities ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Lintuzumab, a humanized anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody, targets myeloid leukemia cells but has only modest activity in AML. To increase the antibody’s potency yet avoid nonspecific cytotoxicity of β-emitting isotopes, 225Ac (t½=10 d), a radiometal that yields 4 α-particles, was conjugated to lintuzumab. A phase I trial showed that 225Ac-lintuzumab is safe at doses ≤ 3 µCi/kg and has anti-leukemic activity across all dose levels studied (Jurcic et al. ASH, 2011). We are conducting a multicenter, phase I dose-escalation trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity, and biological activity of fractionated-dose 225Ac-lintuzumab in combination with LDAC. Patients and Methods: Patients ≥ 60 yrs who had untreated AML with poor prognostic factors, e.g., an antecedent hematologic disorder, unfavorable cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities, and significant comorbidities, were eligible. Patients received LDAC 20 mg twice daily for 10 d every 4-6 wks for up to 12 cycles. During Cycle 1, beginning 4-7 days after completion of LDAC, two doses of 225Ac-lintuzumab were given approximately one week apart. To prevent radiation-induced nephrotoxicity, patients were given furosemide while receiving 225Ac-lintuzumab and spironolactone for one year afterward. Results: Nine patients (median age, 76 yrs; range, 73-81 yrs) were treated. Seven patients (78%) had a history of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), for which five (56%) received prior therapy with hypomethylating agents (n=4) or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (n=1). One patient (11%) had chronic myeloid leukemia in a molecularly undetectable state at the time of AML diagnosis. Six patients (67%) had intermediate-risk cytogenetics, and three (33%) had unfavorable cytogenetics. The median CD33 expression was 76% (range, 45-100%). Patients received 225Ac-lintuzumab at doses of 0.5 (n=3) or 1 (n=6) μCi/kg/fraction. Total administered activity ranged from 68-199 μCi. The median number of cycles administered was 2 (range, 1-4). Dose-limiting toxicity was seen in one patient receiving 1 µCi/kg/fraction who had grade 4 thrombocytopenia with bone marrow aplasia persisting > 6 wks after receiving 225Ac-lintuzumab. Hematologic toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia (n=1) and thrombocytopenia (n=3). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities included febrile neutropenia (n=6), pneumonia (n=2), bacteremia (n=1), cellulitis (n=1), transient increase in creatinine (n=1), hypokalemia (n=1), and generalized weakness (n=1). Bone marrow blast reductions were seen in 5 of 7 patients (71%) evaluated after Cycle 1. Mean blast reduction was 61% (range, 34-100%). Three of the 7 patients (43%) had marrow blast reductions of ≥ 50%; however, no remissions were observed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.5 mos (range, 1.7-15.7+ mos). Median overall survival (OS) from study entry was 5.4 mos (range, 2.2-24 mos). For the 7 patients with prior MDS, median OS was 9.1 mos (range 2.3-24 mos). Conclusions: Fractionated-dose 225Ac-linutuzmab in combination with LDAC is feasible, safe, and has anti-leukemic activity. Dose escalation continues to define the MTD, with planned doses up to 2 µCi/kg/fraction. Additional patients will be treated at the MTD in the phase II portion of this trial to determine response rate, PFS, and OS. Disclosures Ravandi: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Pagel:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Park:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Wahl:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Earle:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cicic:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Scheinberg:Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Equity Ownership, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Blockade of IL-15 Utilizing Bnz-1, a Selective γ-Chain Inhibiting Peptide, Is Safe and Has Clinical Activity in Patients with T-Cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia (T-LGLL): Results of a Phase I/II Multi-Center Clinical Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129291 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2835-2835 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jonathan E. Brammer ◽

Lubomir Sokol ◽

Yutaka Tagaya ◽

Kerry Rogers ◽

Anjali Mishra ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

T Cell ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Weekly Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia

T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL) is an incurable, and likely under-diagnosed leukemia characterized by abnormal clonal proliferation of CD8+ memory T-cells. The clonal outgrowth of T-LGLL cells can lead to the development of profound neutropenia and anemia which results in frequent infections, transfusion dependence, and impairment in quality of life and lifespan. There have been few prospective clinical trials in this disease, and no drugs have been FDA approved for its treatment. The primary driver of leukemogenesis in T-LGLL is known to be interleukin-15 (IL-15), a gamma-chain cytokine that induces proliferation of T-LGLL cells. BNZ-1 is a novel pegylated peptide antagonist that inhibits IL-15 by binding to the common γ-chain receptor for cytokines IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21. Studies utilizing BNZ-1 in vitro on T-LGLL cell lines, and ex vivo on clinical patient samples demonstrated significant inhibition of downstream signaling and increased LGLL cell apoptosis (Wang et al., Leukemia 2018). Given these results, we conducted a phase I/II dose escalation study to evaluate the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and preliminary efficacy of BNZ-1 in T-LGLL (NCT03239393). Patients with T-LGLL were eligible if they had one or more of the following: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <500 cells/m3, neutropenia with recurrent infections, or symptomatic or transfusion-dependent anemia. Diagnosis of T-LGLL required: >400/mm3 CD3+CD57+ cells or >650 mm3 CD8+ cells, with a clonal T-cell receptor rearrangement. No prior therapy within 30 days or 5 half-lives was permitted. MTD was evaluated using a standard 3+3 design; with a dose escalation strategy using four doses of BNZ-1: 0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg, and 4 mg/kg. BNZ-1 was administered by infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 4-week cycle. Patients then had the option to enter the 3-month extension period, at the same weekly dose. Efficacy was determined utilizing criteria from the ECOG5998 study in T-LGLL. CR was defined as complete normalization of blood counts. Partial response (PR) in neutropenic patients was determined by 4 weeks or greater response with ANC >500 cells/mm3 if >/=50% improvement from baseline. For transfusion-dependent anemia patients, a >/=50% decrease in monthly transfusions for at least 2 months was required for a PR. For patients with symptomatic anemia, improvement in hemoglobin >/=1 g/dL with improvement in symptoms constituted a PR. Patients with a response were permitted to remain on a long-term extension (LTE). Eighteen patients, at 3 US centers were enrolled on study including: 3 patients at 0.5 mg/kg, 4 at 1 mg/kg, 5 at 2 mg/kg, and 6 at 4 mg/kg. 10 patients were enrolled for neutropenia, 4 for transfusion dependent anemia, 2 for symptomatic anemia, and 2 with anemia and neutropenia. 15 patients (83%) completed all 16 weeks of treatment, 2 patients declined to enter the extension phase, and one patient on the 2 mg/kg dosage was taken off study at 4 weeks due to neutropenia <100 thought secondary to T-LGLL. One patient developed grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia, which was thought possibly due to study drug though was grade 1 at baseline.The MTD was not reached. Four patients attained a PR: 3 patients with transfusion-dependent anemia became transfusion independent, while one patient with neutropenia had significant resolution of her neutropenia (Table). These three patients remain on the LTE, though one patient is under observation. Correlative studies demonstrated apoptosis of T-LGLL cells on flow cytometry utilizing CD3 T-cell gating within 24 hours of the first dosage of BNZ-1 (a representative example is shown in the Figure), confirming in patients that inhibition of IL-15 induces apoptosis of T-LGLL cells. In this Phase I/II clinical trial, IL-15 blockade utilizing BNZ-1 demonstrated increased apoptosis in patients with T-LGLL, with early evidence of clinical response, particularly amongst patients with transfusion-dependent anemia. Remarkably, these patients remained transfusion-independent while on BNZ-1. The MTD was not reached in this cohort of patients, and there were minimal AEs associated with BNZ-1. Further analysis of responding patients is underway to determine the most effective approach utilizing BNZ-1 in this rare disease. Table Disclosures Brammer: Celgene: Research Funding; Seatlle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Tagaya:Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioniz: Research Funding. Rogers:AbbVie: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Waldmann:Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Azimi:Bioniz: Employment. Frohna:Bioniz: Employment. Ratnayake:Bioniz: Employment. Loughran:Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Keystone Nano: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Combination Trial of Duvelisib (IPI-145) with Bendamustine, Rituximab, or Bendamustine/Rituximab in Patients with Lymphoma or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3928.3928 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3928-3928 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Mohamad Cherry ◽

Michael Maris ◽

Jeffrey V. Matous ◽

Jesus G. Berdeja ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Dose Level ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Expansion Phase ◽

Time Plot

Abstract Background: Duvelisib, a potent inhibitor of the δ and γ isoforms of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) is being developed as a potential therapeutic in hematologic malignancies including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), as well as B and T cell lymphoma. Single agent bendamustine (B), rituximab (R), and their combination have demonstrated proven activity in iNHL and CLL. Combining duvelisib with bendamustine or rituximab alone or with both drugs may improve response rates and the durability of remission. The primary objective of this trial is to characterize the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and a preliminary efficacy profile of duvelisib given in combination with rituximab (Arm 1-DR), bendamustine plus rituximab (Arm 2-DBR) or bendamustine (Arm 3-DB) in subjects with select relapsed/refractory lymphoma or CLL. Methods: Pts with relapsed CLL or NHL, ECOG performance status (PS) ≤2, and adequate organ function were enrolled. The subject population during dose escalation was limited to relapsed NHL. During the dose expansion phase, each treatment arm enrolled to population specific cohorts to continue to assess efficacy. Arm 1 (DR) received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles plus duvelisib PO BID until disease progression or intolerance. Arm 2 (DBR)received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles, bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV for NHL pts or 70 mg/m2 IV for CLL pts on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID until disease progression or intolerance. Arm 3 (DB) received bendamustine 120 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Three different dose levels of duvelisib, 25, 50, and 75 mg PO BID were initially explored. Pts were evaluated for response every 3 cycles according to specific criteria for their disease. Results: Between August 2013 and April 2015, 48 pts, median age 67 yrs (40-83) were enrolled; 12 NHL pts in the dose escalation portion and 36 pts (18 CLL, 18 NHL) in dose expansion. Pts had a median of 2 prior therapies (1-7). In arms 1 (DR) and 2 (DBR), no dose limiting toxicities were seen at the highest dose level of duvelisib (75 mg bid). In arm 3 (DB), with a higher dose of bendamustine, 1 pt developed a DLT at the 50 mg BID dose level of duvelisib (febrile neutropenia, neutropenia ≥ 7 days, thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days, and liver toxicities which resulted in a treatment delay of ≥ 7 days). The MTD was not reached in this study but given recent data of single agent duvelisib showing no advantage in doses >25 mg BID, pts on the expansion phase were treated with 25mg BID. The AE profile of the drug combination is consistent with toxicities of the single agents (Table 1). There have been 2 potentially treatment-related deaths (cardiac arrest in a pt with history of hypertension and diabetes, and pneumonia), both on Arm 1. 38 pts were evaluable for response with an ORR of 74% (8% CR, 66% PR, 16% SD and 10% PD). The ORR of NHL and CLL pts were 64% and 92% respectively. With a median follow up of 16.25 mos, median progression free survival is 13.7 mos overall. Median overall survival (OS) has not been reached, but 15 mo OS probability is 82%. Pharmacokinetics analysis is consistent with the monotherapy Phase I trial of duvelisib (Figure 2) and is not effected by bendamustine. Conclusions: Analysis of duvelisib administered in combination with bendamustine and rituximab shows these combinations to be generally well-tolerated with encouraging response. Further follow-up is required to better characterize both response rates and durability of remissions. Table 1. Treatment-related AEs (≥15% all pts) ARM 1 (N=28) ARM 2 (N=18) ARM 3 (N=2) Preferred Term G 1/2 G 3/4 G 1/2 G 3/4 G 1/2 G 3/4 Treated (N=48) RASH 8 (29%) 3 (11%) 3 (17%) 3 (17%) 0 17 (35%) DIARRHEA 8 (29%) 3 (11%) 2 (11%) 1 (6%) 1 (50%) 0 15 (31%) FATIGUE 9 32%) 0 4 (22%) 1 (6%) 1 (50%) 0 15 (31%) NAUSEA 5 (18%) 0 4 (22%) 0 1 (50%) 0 10 (21%) ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED 5 (18%) 1 (4%) 3 (17%) 0 0 0 9 (19%) NEUTROPENIA 1 (4%) 5 (18%) 0 3 (17%) 0 0 9 (19%) ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED 4 (14%) 1 (4%) 3 (17%) 0 0 0 8 (17%) ANAEMIA 3 (11%) 1 (4%) 2 (11%) 0 1 (50%) 0 7 (15%) PRURITUS 3 (11%) 0 3 (17%) 0 0 0 6 (13%) UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION 5 (18%) 0 1 (6%) 0 0 0 6 (13%) CONSTIPATION 4 (14%) 0 1 (6%) 0 0 0 5 (10%) MUCOSAL INFLAMMATION 3 (11%) 1 (4%) 1 (6%) 0 0 0 5 (10%) Figure 1. Mean IPI-145 Concentration vs Time Plot with Tx Arms Overlaid for the First 6 Hours (Linear) Figure 1. Mean IPI-145 Concentration vs Time Plot with Tx Arms Overlaid for the First 6 Hours (Linear) Disclosures Flinn: Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Berdeja:Curis: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text