scholarly journals Subcutaneous Epcoritamab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Preliminary Results from the Epcore CLL-1 Trial

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2627-2627
Author(s):  
Arnon P. Kater ◽  
Jacob Haaber Christensen ◽  
Hans Herluf Bentzen ◽  
Carsten Utoft Niemann ◽  
Martin Hutchings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Injection Site Reaction ◽  
Steering Committee ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Site Reaction ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background: Small molecules such as Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitors have transformed the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, such treatments are not curative, and patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL following multiple targeted treatments present an emergent challenge with very limited therapeutic options. In addition, success rates of autologous T-cell-based therapies in CLL have been disappointing. In vitro data in CLL cells suggest potentially high efficacy of bispecific T-cell engagers (Martens et al, J Immunother Cancer 2020), but clinical data are extremely limited. Epcoritamab (GEN3013; DuoBody ®-CD3×CD20) is a bispecific antibody that can induce potent activation and cytotoxic activity of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to specifically eliminate CD20-expressing cells (van der Horst et al, Blood Cancer J 2021). In the first-in-human trial in R/R B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL; EPCORE NHL-1; NCT03625037), epcoritamab showed manageable safety and meaningful antitumor activity across a range of aggressive and indolent B-NHLs. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia (69%), cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 59%), and injection-site reaction (47%); CRS events were all grade 1-2 and most occurred in cycle 1 (Clausen et al, J Clin Oncol 2021). However, as CLL is characterized by presence of (high numbers of) circulating tumor cells, acquired T-cell dysfunction, and variable expression of CD20, data obtained in B-NHL are difficult to extrapolate to CLL. Herein we present the first results from the dose-escalation part of a phase 1b/2 trial evaluating epcoritamab in pts with R/R CLL. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 trial, toxicity and efficacy of epcoritamab are investigated in adults with R/R CLL (EPCORE CLL-1; NCT04623541). Eligible pts previously received ≥2 lines of systemic antineoplastic therapy, including treatment with (or intolerance to) a BTK inhibitor. Epcoritamab is subcutaneously administered via 1-mL injections in 4-week cycles as follows: once weekly in cycles 1-3, every 2 weeks in cycles 4-9, and monthly in cycles ≥10 until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Step-up dosing during cycle 1 (ie, priming dose followed by an intermediate dose, then full doses) is used in combination with steroid prophylaxis to reduce the risk of CRS. In the dose-escalation part, pts with R/R CLL received epcoritamab at 2 full-dose levels (24 and 48 mg) according to a modified 3+3 design. Primary end points of the dose-escalation part included dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first 28-day treatment cycle and the incidence and severity of AEs, CRS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Results: The first pt was enrolled on November 30, 2020. As of July 12, 2021, 7 pts with R/R CLL received epcoritamab subcutaneously administered at 2 full-dose levels: 24 mg (n=3) and 48 mg (n=4). Six pts completed the DLT evaluation period, and 5 pts had a full response assessment. Pts had received a median of 4 lines of prior therapy (range, 2-5). Six of 7 pts had poor-risk features of del(17p), TP53 mutations, or both. Three of 7 pts had bulky disease. No DLTs occurred at 24 or 48 mg. The most common treatment-emergent AEs (>30%) were CRS (100%), fatigue (71%), injection-site reaction (43%), and nausea (43%). All pts experienced CRS in the first cycle, but no CRS events were higher than grade 2. No cases of ICANS were observed. TLS was not observed. Antileukemic activity has been observed at both dose levels, with partial responses in 3 of 5 pts. Updated clinical and pharmacokinetic data, including data for additional pts treated with epcoritamab, will be presented. Conclusions: These data suggest that epcoritamab is well tolerated in pts with R/R CLL at dose levels up to 48 mg and has clinical activity in pts with high-risk features. The expansion part of this study in pts with R/R CLL and Richter syndrome will open later this year. Disclosures Kater: Janssen, AstraZeneca: Other: Ad Board, steering committee, Research Funding; BMS, Roche/Genentech: Other: Ad Board, , Research Funding; Genmab, LAVA: Other: Ad Board, Steering Committee; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Ad Board, Research Funding. Niemann: CSL Behring, Genmab, Takeda, Octapharma: Consultancy; Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk Foundation: Research Funding. Hutchings: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Chen: Genmab: Current Employment. Rios: Genmab: Current Employment. Palenski: AbbVie: Current Employment. Li: Genmab: Current Employment. Mato: AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSKCC: Current Employment; Genmab: Research Funding; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; LOXO: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nurix: Research Funding; DTRM BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: DSMB, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Clinical Safety and Activity in a Phase 1 Trial of IPI-145, a Potent Inhibitor of Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase-δ,γ, in Patients with Advanced Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3663-3663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Steven M. Horwitz ◽  
Manish Patel ◽  
Anas Younes ◽  
James R. Porter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Expansion Cohort ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3663 Introduction: Phosphoinositide-3-kinases (PI3Ks) play pivotal roles in cell signaling and regulate a variety of cellular functions relevant to oncogenesis. Impaired development and function of B and T lymphocytes has been demonstrated in PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ isoform knockout mice, supporting the development of PI3K-δ,γ specific inhibitors for B- and T-cell lymphoid malignancies. IPI-145 is a potent PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor in clinical development for patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies. The activity of IPI-145 via PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ isoform inhibition has been characterized in biochemical and cellular assays and demonstrated in preclinical models of B- and T-cell mediated disease. Early results of the Phase 1 study in pts with advanced hematologic malignancies are reported here. Methods and Patients: This Phase 1 dose-escalation study is designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and activity of orally administered IPI-145 in pts with advanced hematologic malignancies, including T-cell lymphomas/leukemias. Sequential cohorts of pts are enrolled at progressively higher dose levels with expansion cohorts of pts with select hematologic malignancies. IPI-145 is administered orally 2 times per day (BID) continuously in 28-day cycles. Tumor response is evaluated based on disease-specific standard criteria. Results: As of 16 July 2012, the study had enrolled 20 pts; 5 pts with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL), 4 with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL), 3 with aggressive B-cell NHL [including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) n=2 and Richter's transformation n=1], 3 with multiple myeloma (MM), 2 with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), 2 with T-cell lymphoma [anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) n=2] and 1 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Of these pts, 11 are male and 9 female, with a median [range] age of 63 years [30–81], with 36% <6 month from most recent prior systemic therapy. The median [range] number of prior therapies was 3 [1–8]. IPI-145 doses administered include 8 mg BID (n=1), 15 mg BID (n=6), 25 mg BID (n=7), 35 mg BID (n=3), and 50 mg BID (n=3). The median [range] number of treatment cycles was 2 [1–8], with 12 (60%) pts continuing on treatment. Adverse events (AEs) have occurred in 13 (65%) pts, including 7 (35%) pts with AEs Grade ≥3. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 11 pts (55%) with Grade ≥3 occurring in 5 pts (25%). Grade 4 neutropenia was the one dose limiting toxicity observed to date (15 mg dose cohort). New Grade ≥3 hematological laboratory abnormalities included neutropenia [n= 6 (30%)] and thrombocytopenia [n= 1 (5%)]. Grade 3 ALT/AST elevations occurred in 1 (5%) MM pt with onset 6 weeks after IPI-145 initiation. Preliminary PK show dose-proportional increases in plasma Cmax and AUC over the dose range studied. Further, the PK and initial pharmacodynamic (PD) data from the first 3 cohorts (8–25 mg BID) predict continuous suppression of the PI3K-δ pathway with increasing inhibition of the PI3K-γ pathway with a 25 mg BID dose or greater. In the evaluable pts (n=11), responses were observed at the 8, 15, and 25 mg BID dose levels including 2/3 CLL/SLL pts (0 CR/2 PR/1 SD), 1/2 iNHL pts (1 CR/0 PR/1 SD), and 1/1 in MCL (1 PR). No responses have been observed to date in evaluable pts with MM (0/3) or aggressive NHL (0/2). All pts with at least SD after 2 cycles (n=6) remain on treatment including the first pt dosed. Based on the PK/PD and the preliminary activity observed in pts with CLL, iNHL and MCL, an expansion cohort is enrolling pts in these select hematologic diseases dosed at 25 mg BID to further evaluate the safety and preliminary activity of IPI-145. Dose escalation continues with a focus on pts with T-cell malignancies and DLBCL where increasing suppression of the PI3K-γ isoform may improve the efficacy profile. Additional expansion cohorts in T-cell lymphoma, DLBCL, myeloproliferative neoplasms and the acute leukemias will better define disease specific activity. Conclusions: IPI-145, an oral, potent PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, appears to be well tolerated and has shown initial clinical activity in pts with iNHL, MCL, and CLL. A dose of 25 mg BID effectively inhibits PI3K-δ, providing a rationale for expansion in CLL/iNHL/MCL. Additional safety and efficacy data from the ongoing dose escalation evaluation in T-cell/aggressive NHL and the CLL/iNHL/MCL expansion cohort will be presented. Disclosures: Flinn: Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Horwitz:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allos: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding. Patel:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding. Younes:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Research Funding; MIllenium: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Porter:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Sweeney:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Allen:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Kelly:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Kahl:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding.

scholarly journals Preliminary Results of a Phase 1b Study (GO28440) Combining GDC-0199 (ABT-199) with Bendamustine/Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory or Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3337-3337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Andre Salles ◽  
Thomas E Boyd ◽  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Clemens-Martin Wendtner ◽  
James Lymp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Previous Exposure ◽  
Phase 1B

Abstract Introduction New therapies are needed for patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). BCL2 is an anti-apoptotic protein that is overexpressed in CLL and may be associated with resistance to available therapies; GDC-0199 is an orally available, selective BCL2 inhibitor. The combination of bendamustine (B) and rituximab (R) has demonstrated efficacy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) and previously untreated pts with CLL and is often used in these pts. Preclinical data suggest that GDC-0199 combined with BR may show synergistic activity in CLL. Moreover, clinical data from single-agent studies of GDC-0199, and in combination with rituximab in pts with CLL, support combining GDC-0199 with BR in this population. Data presented here are from an ongoing phase 1b study that is evaluating the maximum tolerated dose of GDC-0199 when given in combination with BR, as well as the safety, tolerability, and order of administration of this combination in R/R or previously untreated pts with CLL. Methods Pts with an ECOG PS ≤1, adequate marrow, hepatic, renal and coagulation function are being enrolled in dose finding cohorts ranging from 100 to 600 mg/day of GDC-0199 using a 3+3 dose escalation design. Pts are assigned to one of two dosing schedules (Figure 1) with GDC-0199 (Schedule A) or BR (Schedule B) introduced first, both incorporating a gradual dose ramp-up of GDC-0199 to reduce the risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Prophylaxis measures to mitigate TLS include IV hydration, treatment to prevent hyperuricemia and hospitalization. After completing combination therapy, R/R pts will continue single-agent GDC-0199 until disease progression. Previously untreated pts will continue single-agent GDC-0199 for up to 18 months. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) data are identified after all pts in a cohort have completed ³21 days of combination treatment at the target dose of GDC-0199 and focus on treatment emergent TLS and cytopenias. Figure 1 Figure 1. Results As of May 2014, 6 pts with R/R CLL have been enrolled in the dose finding stage of the study with a median time on study of 67 (range 43-113) days. All 6 pts were enrolled on Schedule A; 3 pts were enrolled in the 100 mg GDC-0199 cohort and 3 pts were enrolled in the 200 mg cohort. Baseline characteristics of the 6 pts are as follows: median age 67 (range 52-71) years, 3 male pts, median of 2 prior CLL therapies (range 1-3, including 4 pts with previous exposure to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab [FCR] and 1 with previous exposure to FCR and B), beta-2 microglobulin ≥3.5 mg/L in 2 pts, and unmutated IGHV in 5 pts. Prior to starting therapy, the median lymphocyte count was 40.85 x 109 cells/L (range 2.11-169 x 109 cells/L), hemoglobin level was 101.5 g/L (range 99-134 g/L), neutrophil count was 2.54 cells/μL (range 1.81-3.8 cells/μL), and platelet count was 83.5 x 109/L (range 49-250 x 109/L). Pts were assigned to 1 of 3 TLS risk groups based on screening ALC and tumor bulk: low risk 1 pt, medium risk 4 pts, and high risk 1 pt. Cytogenetic data are available for 3 pts: 1 pt had del17p, 2 pts had del 11q, and 3 pts had del 13q. No DLTs were observed. All 6 pts have experienced adverse events (AEs, Figure 2). The most common AE was anemia with most Grade ³3 AEs being hematological toxicities (Figure 2). One serious AE of bronchitis was observed in a pt enrolled in the 100 mg GDC-0199 cohort and resolved after treatment. Two pts in the 100 mg GDC-0199 cohort discontinued BR after the 21-day DLT window secondary to treatment emergent cytopenia: 1 with neutropenia after completing 1 cycle of BR (previous treatment FCR without baseline cytopenia) and the second with thrombocytopenia after completing 3 cycles of BR (previous treatment FCR and chlorambucil with thrombocytopenia at screening). Both pts remain on single-agent GDC-0199. No TLS events (laboratory or clinical) were observed and no deaths reported. Figure 2 Figure 2. Conclusion This is the first study to evaluate the combination of GDC-0199 and BR in pts with CLL. Despite 5 pts being identified as medium or high risk for TLS, no pts developed TLS as a result of the ramp-up dosing of GDC-199 and prophylactic measures. The most frequent AEs were hematological toxicities and generally manageable; however, 2 pts had to discontinue BR (after 1 and 3 cycles) but were able to remain on GDC-0199. Dose escalation in R/R pts is continuing in order to evaluate the optimal dose/schedule with a plan to enroll previously untreated pts in the near future. Disclosures Boyd: Genentech: Research Funding; US Oncology/McKesson: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Morschhauser:Genentech: Travel grant Other; Gilead, Mundipharma, Bayer, Spectrum, Celgene: Honoraria. Wendtner:AbbVie, Genentech, Hoffman-La Roche, Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lymp:Genentech: Employment. Hilger:Genentech: Employment. Vosganian:Genentech: Employment. Huang:Genentech: Employment. Stilgenbauer:Genentech, Hoffman La Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 1 Trial of Human IL-15 (rhIL-15) and Obinutuzumab for Relapsed and Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3052-3052
Author(s):  
Milos D. Miljkovic ◽  
Kevin C Conlon ◽  
Jennifer Hsu ◽  
Clare Sun ◽  
Adrian Wiestner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Btk Inhibitor ◽  
Dose Levels

Background: Of the several drugs and drug combinations approved for treatment of relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the reported complete response rates are no greater than 30%. Obinutuzumab is a glycoengineered, humanized type 2 anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody thought to engage the immune system by directly activating antibody- dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC); it is approved for treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in combination with chlorambucil. The key mediators of ADCC are polymorphonuclear neutrophils, monocytes, and natural killer (NK) cells. Recombinant human Interleukin-15 (rhIL-15) is a stimulatory cytokine that promotes the differentiation and activation of NK cells, monocytes, and long-term CD8+ memory T-cells. In a Phase I trial, administration of rhIL-15 as a 5-day continuous intravenous infusion (civ) was associated with up to 45-fold increase in the number of NK cells at well- tolerated dose levels. Preclinical murine lymphoid malignancy models have shown increased efficacy of monoclonal antibodies when administered together with rhIL-15; BL/6 mice inoculated with EL4-CD20 cells (a syngeneic lymphoma line); including significant prolongation of survival with the IL-15/Rituximab combination compared to either drug given as single agent (90% v. 30% alive at 75 days). We hypothesized that rhIL-15-associated increase in NK cell number and activity would improve efficacy of obinutuzumab in treatment of relapsed and refractory CLL, and would increase the duration and depth of response; this phase I trial is testing the safety of the combination. Primary objective: determine the safety, toxicity profile, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of civ rhIL-15 administration in combination with obinutuzumab treatment Secondary objectives: 1) evaluate the potential antitumor activity of the combination of rhIL-15 and obinutuzumab by assessing the clinical response rate, minimal residual disease (MRD) status, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients with relapsed and refractory CLL; 2) define the effects of rhIL-15 on the ADCC mediated by obinutuzumab using ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs); 3) characterize the biological effects of rhIL-15 administered with obinutuzumab on the percentages and absolute numbers of circulating lymphocytes (T and NK cells) and the T- cell subsets (including naïve, central, and effector memory subsets) by flow cytometry Exploratory objectives: identify biomarkers predictive of response to rhIL-15 and obinutuzumab treatment, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and baseline cytokine levels Eligibility criteria: 1) age ≥ 18 years; 2) ECOG ≤ 1; 3) Diagnosis of CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) with ≥ 50% of B cells expressing CD20; 4) measurable or evaluable disease that is refractory or relapsed following therapy with a BTK inhibitor OR have relapsed/refractory CLL and are intolerant to BTK inhibitor therapy; patients with del(17p) must also be refractory or relapsed after, or intolerant to, therapy with venetoclax; 5) adequate organ function parameters as defined within the protocol; 6) active disease requiring treatment, as defined within the protocol. Study design: a single institution non-randomized phase I dose escalation study evaluating increasing doses of civ rhIL-15 in combination with obinutuzumab using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design. On days 1-5 of each 4-week cycle, rhIL-15 will be administered by civ at dose levels 0.5, 1, and 2 mcg/kg/day. During the first cycle, obinutuzumab will be administered at a dose of 100 mg by IV on day 4, 900 mg on day 5, 1,000 mg on day 11, and 1,000 mg on day 18; then 1,000 mg on day 4 of each subsequent cycle. Infusion reaction, antimicrobial, and tumor lysis syndrome prophylaxis will be administered per manufacturer's recommendations. Treatment will continue up to 6 cycles, or until unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease. Up to 24 patients will be enrolled in the study. Correlative studies: 1) optional lymph node biopsy at baseline and after the first week of treatment (C1D8) for tissue immune cell subsets and quantifying antibody penetration; 2) lymphocyte subset testing, ctDNA, and cell and plasma banking on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of cycle 1, and days 1 and 8 of cycles 2-6; 3) ADCC capacity of ex vivo NK cells on C1D1, 4, and 8. One patient has started treatment to date. Enrollment is ongoing. Figure Disclosures Wiestner: Acerta: Research Funding; Pharmayclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Nurix: Research Funding. Waldmann:Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Prior Treatment with Alemtuzumab Interferes with T-Cell Engraftment After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3351-3351
Author(s):  
Johannes Schetelig ◽  
Christian Thiede ◽  
Alexander Kiani ◽  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
Uta Oelschlaegel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Washout Period ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Engraftment ◽  
Median Level ◽  
Antibody Levels ◽  
Donor Lymphocyte Infusions

Abstract Abstract 3351 Poster Board III-239 Objectives: The majority of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who receive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have fludarabine-refractory disease. The most active single agent in this disease stage is alemtuzumab. Alemtuzumab has a long half-life and induces profound T-cell depletion (TCD). Since TCD may mitigate graft-versus leukemia effects we evaluated „pre-conditioning“ with alemtuzumab followed by a washout period in order to minimize in vivo T-cell depletion of the graft in a phase II study (NCT 00337519). Methods: Patients received cytoreductive treatment with 3 × 30 mg alemtuzumab weekly prior to HCT. The scheduled interval between last dose of alemtuzumab and HCT was increased from two weeks to one month during the study. The antibody level at the day of HCT was measured with an ELISA with a lower limit of detection of 31.25 ng/mL (BioAnaLab lim., Oxford, UK). The conditioning regimen contained fludarabine (150 mg/m2) and busulfan (8 mg/kg). Cyclosporine (CSA) and methotrexate (MTX) were applied as GVHD-prophylaxis. Medically fit patients with relapsed CLL were elible. Results: 62 patients with a median age of 57 years were included between April, 2004 and October, 2008. A median of 3 prior regimens had been given. 55% of the patients had fludarabine-resistant disease. Two patients failed to reach HCT due to progressive disease during alemtuzumab therapy. Donors were matched siblings for 26 and matched unrelated donors for 34 patients. The median level of alemtuzumab in peripheral blood after a washout period of two weeks was 62 ng/mL (interquartile range, 45 to 196 ng/mL; minimum below the limit of detection; maximum 490 ng/mL) compared to a median level below the limit of detection after a delay of four weeks (interquartile range, between the limit of detection and 77 ng/mL, maximum 256 ng/mL) (p=0.005). Despite one month time between the last dose of alemtuzumab and HCT 4 out of 30 patients (13%) had alemtuzumab levels greater than 200 ng/mL. No primary or secondary graft failure occurred. A linear relationship between the alemtuzumab level at HCT and the time to complete CD4-T-cell chimerism (TCC) was observed (p=0.003). At day +100 a CD4 positive T-cell-chimerism (TCC) >95% had been achieved by 84% of patients with alemtuzumab levels <100 ng/mL, 83% of patients with antibody levels between 100 and 200 ng/mL and 25% of patients with antibody levels >200 ng/mL (p=0.006). All patients had a complete neutrophil-chimerism at day +100. After early taper of immunosuppression (N=2) or the application of donor lymphocyte infusions in incremental doses (N=5) mixed TCC has been converted to complete TCC in all patients. The median follow-up is 17 months (1 to 61 months). Day +100 non-relapse mortality was 2%. At two years non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence were 21% and 29%, respectively. Two-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 67% (95% CI, 51% to 83%) and 50% (95% CI, 31% to 69%). Conclusions: In patients who received alemtuzumab prior to HCT, residual drug levels may interfere with T-cell engraftment. Lineage specific T-cell chimerism should therefore be assessed prospectively in this group of patients. Persistent mixed T-cell chimerism can be converted by an early taper of immunosuppression and incremental doses of donor lymphocyte infusions. Disclosures: Schetelig: Bayer Schering: Research Funding. Platzbecker:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Navitoclax (ABT-263) Plus Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR) or Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR): A Phase 1 Study In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2455-2455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Jeffrey A. Jones ◽  
Lode J. Swinnen ◽  
Jianning Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Abstract 2455 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263), a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule, binds with high affinity (Ki ≤1nM) to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w, promoting apoptosis. In vitro, navitoclax shows potent targeted cytotoxicity (EC50 ≤ 1μM) against T and B lymphoid malignancies that over-express Bcl-2. A phase 1 trial demonstrated oral navitoclax monotherapy to be well-tolerated and to have anti-tumor activity in patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, thrombocytopenia (TCP) was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Phase 3 studies showed improved outcomes in CLL pts with the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) combination, and a phase 2 trial showed bendamustine/rituximab (BR) to be effective for pts with relapsed or refractory CLL. Navitoclax enhanced R (monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy) efficacy in preclinical models of B-cell lymphoma. Methods: This is an ongoing, international, phase 1 dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral navitoclax in combination with FCR (Arm A) or BR (Arm B) in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL. Secondary objectives are efficacy endpoints (PFS, ORR, TTP, OS, duration of response). Eligible pts had measurable disease, ECOG performance score ≤1, ANC ≥100/μL, platelets ≥100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL. Preliminary results are reported. After obtaining informed consent, pts were assigned to Arm A or Arm B based on physician preference, each consisting of 28-day dose-escalation cycles with once-daily, pre-infusion, navitoclax treatment on Days 3–5 of Cycle 1 and Days 1–3 of subsequent cycles. In both arms, R was 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of Cycle 1; and 500 mg/m2 on Day 2 of Cycle 2 and on Day 1 of subsequent cycles. In Arm A, F 25 mg/m2 and C 175 mg/m2 were dosed on Days 2–4 in Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1–3 in subsequent cycles. In Arm B, B was dosed at 70 mg/m2 on Days 2 and 3 of Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1 and 2 in subsequent cycles. Navitoclax starting dose was 110 mg daily. Dose escalation to the next cohort (200 mg) was according to a continuous reassessment model. Tumor responses were evaluated using NCI-WG 1996 criteria. Pts could continue on navitoclax therapy for 1 yr in the absence of progressive disease or significant toxicity. Results: As of July 2010, 7 pts enrolled in the initially prioritized Arm B (BR+navitoclax); all completed the first cohort of 110 mg (median age 60 yr [range 55–72]). Study sites are currently enrolling pts in Arm A (FCR+navitoclax); 2 pts have enrolled to date. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–7). One pt had a DLT of elevated AST (Arm B, 110 mg cohort) and 1 pt had a DLT of neutropenic fever (Arm A, 110 mg cohort). In Arm B, neither TCP nor neutropenia have been DLTs. For the 7 pts with navitoclax-related AEs, the most common were diarrhea (3 pts), nausea (5 pts), and fatigue (3 pts). Seven pts remain on study; 2 pts discontinued due to disease progression and 2 withdrew per physician preference. In Arm B, preliminary antitumor best responses were assessable in 4 pts who received 2 cycles; 1 CRi in a pt with del17p- (based on lymph node [LN] response and no morphologic evidence of CLL in the bone marrow), 2 unconfirmed CRs (based on LN response and no bone marrow at this time), and 1 PR in a pt with del17p- (this pt subsequently received an allogeneic stem cell transplant). Preliminary PK results for the Arm B 110 mg cohort indicated that navitoclax PK was similar in Cycle 1 (navitoclax+BR) and Cycle 2 (navitoclax alone), and appeared comparable to PK in the navitoclax monotherapy study. Conclusions: Early results show that the combination of navitoclax with BR is well-tolerated, without DLTs of TCP or neutropenia, and show evidence of anti-tumor activity. Data are limited in the FCR portion of the study. The maximum tolerated dose of navitoclax has not been reached. Accrual is ongoing and following completion of the dose-escalation components of this study, expanded cohorts of pts will be assessed using the recommended phase 2 dose of navitoclax to further assess the tolerability and dose, and to continue to explore for efficacy signals in combinations. Preliminary data in combination with BR are encouraging. Disclosures: Kipps: Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding. Wierda: Abbott: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jones: Glaxo Smith-Kline: Consultancy; Abbott: Research Funding. Swinnen: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Yang: Abbott: Employment. Cui: Abbott: Employment. Busman: Abbott: Employment. Krivoshik: Abbott: Employment. Enschede: Abbott: Employment. Humerickhouse: Abbott: Employment.

scholarly journals An Open-Label, Phase Ib Study of Duvelisib (IPI-145) in Combination with Bendamustine, Rituximab or Bendamustine/Rituximab in Select Subjects with Lymphoma or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4422-4422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Flinn ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Michael B Maris ◽  
Jeffrey Matous ◽  
Mohamad Cherry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Delay ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Duvelisib is a potent inhibitor of the δ and γ isoforms of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) being developed as a potential therapeutic in hematologic malignancies including B and T cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In a phase I study of single agent duvelisib (D), ORR of 52% was seen in pts with indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (iNHL) and 47% in CLL. Bendamustine (B), rituximab (R), and their combination have demonstrated proven activity in iNHL and CLL. Combining duvelisib with either bendamustine or rituximab alone or in combination with each other may improve response rates and the durability of remission. The goal of this Phase 1b, open-label, three-arm, non-randomized, dose escalating, safety and tolerability trial is to characterize the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and preliminary efficacy profile of duvelisib given in combination with rituximab (Arm 1-DR), bendamustine plus rituximab (Arm 2-DBR) or bendamustine (Arm 3-DB) in subjects with select relapsed/refractory lymphoma or CLL. Methods: Pts had relapsed CLL or NHL, ECOG performance status (PS) ≤2, and adequate organ function. The subject population during dose escalation was limited to relapsed NHL. During the dose expansion phase, each treatment arm enrolled to population specific cohorts to continue to assess efficacy. Arm 1 (DR) received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Arm 2 (DBR)received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles, bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Arm 3 (DB) received bendamustine 120 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Three different dose levels of duvelisib were explored, 25, 50, and 75 mg PO BID. DLTs were defined as: febrile neutropenia, G4 neutropenia ≥7 days, G4 thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days or G3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, Grade 4 AST/ALT, Grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia ≥7 days, ≥ Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity ≥7 days (excluding alopecia), Treatment delay of ≥7 days due to unresolved toxicity that prevents re-dosing, hepatocellular injury (defined as ALT>2 x ULN and (ALT/ULN)/(ALP/ULN) >5) and bilirubin >2 x ULN or jaundice ± alkaline phosphatase <2 x ULN. Patients were evaluated for response every 3 cycles according to specific criteria for their disease. Results: Between August 2013 and May 2014, 32 pts, median age 66 years (44-78) were enrolled to the study, 12 NHL pts on the dose escalation portion and 20 pts on dose expansion (13 CLL, 7 NHL). Patients had a median of 4 prior therapies (1-11). In arms 1 (DR) and 2 (DBR), no dose limiting toxicities were seen at the highest dose level of duvelisib (75 mg bid). In arm 3 (DB) in which a higher dose of bendamustine is used 1 pt developed a DLT at the 50 mg BID dose level of duvelisib (febrile neutropenia, neutropenia ≥ 7 days, thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days, and liver toxicities which resulted in a treatment delay of ≥ 7 days). Dose escalation continues in this arm as the MTD has not reached. Patients on the dose expansion portion of the study are receiving duvelisib at 25 mg BID due to emerging data of duvelisib monotherapy showing no advantage in doses greater than 25 mg BID in these histologies. The AE profile is consistent with the toxicities of the single agents. The most common AEs > grade 3 were neutropenia (28% overall; [Arm 1 (DR), 27%]; [Arm 2 (DBR), 38%]), and rash (16% overall; [Arm 1, 14%]; [Arm 2, 25%]). Grade 3 or higher AST/ALT increases were seen in 2 out of 12 patients on Arm 1, 2 out of 8 patients on Arm 2 and no patients on Arm 3. There have been 2 deaths (cardiac arrest and pneumonia), both on Arm 1. Twenty one pts were evaluable for response with an ORR of 81% (10% CR, 71% PR, 14% SD and 5% PD). With a median follow up of 4.0 months, time to event analyses are immature. However, Kaplan-Meier estimate of PFS at 3 months is 87%. PK analysis is consistent with the monotherapy Phase I trial of duvelisib. Conclusions: Initial early analysis of duvelisib administered in combination with bendamustine and rituximab suggests these combinations to be generally well-tolerated with encouraging. Further follow-up is required to better characterize response rates and durability of remissions. Disclosures Flinn: Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Matous:Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Blockade of IL-15 Utilizing Bnz-1, a Selective γ-Chain Inhibiting Peptide, Is Safe and Has Clinical Activity in Patients with T-Cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia (T-LGLL): Results of a Phase I/II Multi-Center Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2835-2835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan E. Brammer ◽  
Lubomir Sokol ◽  
Yutaka Tagaya ◽  
Kerry Rogers ◽  
Anjali Mishra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia

T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL) is an incurable, and likely under-diagnosed leukemia characterized by abnormal clonal proliferation of CD8+ memory T-cells. The clonal outgrowth of T-LGLL cells can lead to the development of profound neutropenia and anemia which results in frequent infections, transfusion dependence, and impairment in quality of life and lifespan. There have been few prospective clinical trials in this disease, and no drugs have been FDA approved for its treatment. The primary driver of leukemogenesis in T-LGLL is known to be interleukin-15 (IL-15), a gamma-chain cytokine that induces proliferation of T-LGLL cells. BNZ-1 is a novel pegylated peptide antagonist that inhibits IL-15 by binding to the common γ-chain receptor for cytokines IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21. Studies utilizing BNZ-1 in vitro on T-LGLL cell lines, and ex vivo on clinical patient samples demonstrated significant inhibition of downstream signaling and increased LGLL cell apoptosis (Wang et al., Leukemia 2018). Given these results, we conducted a phase I/II dose escalation study to evaluate the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and preliminary efficacy of BNZ-1 in T-LGLL (NCT03239393). Patients with T-LGLL were eligible if they had one or more of the following: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <500 cells/m3, neutropenia with recurrent infections, or symptomatic or transfusion-dependent anemia. Diagnosis of T-LGLL required: >400/mm3 CD3+CD57+ cells or >650 mm3 CD8+ cells, with a clonal T-cell receptor rearrangement. No prior therapy within 30 days or 5 half-lives was permitted. MTD was evaluated using a standard 3+3 design; with a dose escalation strategy using four doses of BNZ-1: 0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg, and 4 mg/kg. BNZ-1 was administered by infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 4-week cycle. Patients then had the option to enter the 3-month extension period, at the same weekly dose. Efficacy was determined utilizing criteria from the ECOG5998 study in T-LGLL. CR was defined as complete normalization of blood counts. Partial response (PR) in neutropenic patients was determined by 4 weeks or greater response with ANC >500 cells/mm3 if >/=50% improvement from baseline. For transfusion-dependent anemia patients, a >/=50% decrease in monthly transfusions for at least 2 months was required for a PR. For patients with symptomatic anemia, improvement in hemoglobin >/=1 g/dL with improvement in symptoms constituted a PR. Patients with a response were permitted to remain on a long-term extension (LTE). Eighteen patients, at 3 US centers were enrolled on study including: 3 patients at 0.5 mg/kg, 4 at 1 mg/kg, 5 at 2 mg/kg, and 6 at 4 mg/kg. 10 patients were enrolled for neutropenia, 4 for transfusion dependent anemia, 2 for symptomatic anemia, and 2 with anemia and neutropenia. 15 patients (83%) completed all 16 weeks of treatment, 2 patients declined to enter the extension phase, and one patient on the 2 mg/kg dosage was taken off study at 4 weeks due to neutropenia <100 thought secondary to T-LGLL. One patient developed grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia, which was thought possibly due to study drug though was grade 1 at baseline.The MTD was not reached. Four patients attained a PR: 3 patients with transfusion-dependent anemia became transfusion independent, while one patient with neutropenia had significant resolution of her neutropenia (Table). These three patients remain on the LTE, though one patient is under observation. Correlative studies demonstrated apoptosis of T-LGLL cells on flow cytometry utilizing CD3 T-cell gating within 24 hours of the first dosage of BNZ-1 (a representative example is shown in the Figure), confirming in patients that inhibition of IL-15 induces apoptosis of T-LGLL cells. In this Phase I/II clinical trial, IL-15 blockade utilizing BNZ-1 demonstrated increased apoptosis in patients with T-LGLL, with early evidence of clinical response, particularly amongst patients with transfusion-dependent anemia. Remarkably, these patients remained transfusion-independent while on BNZ-1. The MTD was not reached in this cohort of patients, and there were minimal AEs associated with BNZ-1. Further analysis of responding patients is underway to determine the most effective approach utilizing BNZ-1 in this rare disease. Table Disclosures Brammer: Celgene: Research Funding; Seatlle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Tagaya:Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioniz: Research Funding. Rogers:AbbVie: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Waldmann:Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Azimi:Bioniz: Employment. Frohna:Bioniz: Employment. Ratnayake:Bioniz: Employment. Loughran:Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Keystone Nano: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Combination Trial of Duvelisib (IPI-145) with Bendamustine, Rituximab, or Bendamustine/Rituximab in Patients with Lymphoma or Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3928-3928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Mohamad Cherry ◽  
Michael Maris ◽  
Jeffrey V. Matous ◽  
Jesus G. Berdeja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Time Plot

Abstract Background: Duvelisib, a potent inhibitor of the δ and γ isoforms of phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) is being developed as a potential therapeutic in hematologic malignancies including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), as well as B and T cell lymphoma. Single agent bendamustine (B), rituximab (R), and their combination have demonstrated proven activity in iNHL and CLL. Combining duvelisib with bendamustine or rituximab alone or with both drugs may improve response rates and the durability of remission. The primary objective of this trial is to characterize the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and a preliminary efficacy profile of duvelisib given in combination with rituximab (Arm 1-DR), bendamustine plus rituximab (Arm 2-DBR) or bendamustine (Arm 3-DB) in subjects with select relapsed/refractory lymphoma or CLL. Methods: Pts with relapsed CLL or NHL, ECOG performance status (PS) ≤2, and adequate organ function were enrolled. The subject population during dose escalation was limited to relapsed NHL. During the dose expansion phase, each treatment arm enrolled to population specific cohorts to continue to assess efficacy. Arm 1 (DR) received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles plus duvelisib PO BID until disease progression or intolerance. Arm 2 (DBR)received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 2, 28 day cycles, bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV for NHL pts or 70 mg/m2 IV for CLL pts on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID until disease progression or intolerance. Arm 3 (DB) received bendamustine 120 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 of the first six cycles plus duvelisib PO BID up to 12 cycles. Three different dose levels of duvelisib, 25, 50, and 75 mg PO BID were initially explored. Pts were evaluated for response every 3 cycles according to specific criteria for their disease. Results: Between August 2013 and April 2015, 48 pts, median age 67 yrs (40-83) were enrolled; 12 NHL pts in the dose escalation portion and 36 pts (18 CLL, 18 NHL) in dose expansion. Pts had a median of 2 prior therapies (1-7). In arms 1 (DR) and 2 (DBR), no dose limiting toxicities were seen at the highest dose level of duvelisib (75 mg bid). In arm 3 (DB), with a higher dose of bendamustine, 1 pt developed a DLT at the 50 mg BID dose level of duvelisib (febrile neutropenia, neutropenia ≥ 7 days, thrombocytopenia ≥ 7 days, and liver toxicities which resulted in a treatment delay of ≥ 7 days). The MTD was not reached in this study but given recent data of single agent duvelisib showing no advantage in doses >25 mg BID, pts on the expansion phase were treated with 25mg BID. The AE profile of the drug combination is consistent with toxicities of the single agents (Table 1). There have been 2 potentially treatment-related deaths (cardiac arrest in a pt with history of hypertension and diabetes, and pneumonia), both on Arm 1. 38 pts were evaluable for response with an ORR of 74% (8% CR, 66% PR, 16% SD and 10% PD). The ORR of NHL and CLL pts were 64% and 92% respectively. With a median follow up of 16.25 mos, median progression free survival is 13.7 mos overall. Median overall survival (OS) has not been reached, but 15 mo OS probability is 82%. Pharmacokinetics analysis is consistent with the monotherapy Phase I trial of duvelisib (Figure 2) and is not effected by bendamustine. Conclusions: Analysis of duvelisib administered in combination with bendamustine and rituximab shows these combinations to be generally well-tolerated with encouraging response. Further follow-up is required to better characterize both response rates and durability of remissions. Table 1. Treatment-related AEs (≥15% all pts) ARM 1 (N=28) ARM 2 (N=18) ARM 3 (N=2) Preferred Term G 1/2 G 3/4 G 1/2 G 3/4 G 1/2 G 3/4 Treated (N=48) RASH 8 (29%) 3 (11%) 3 (17%) 3 (17%) 0 17 (35%) DIARRHEA 8 (29%) 3 (11%) 2 (11%) 1 (6%) 1 (50%) 0 15 (31%) FATIGUE 9 32%) 0 4 (22%) 1 (6%) 1 (50%) 0 15 (31%) NAUSEA 5 (18%) 0 4 (22%) 0 1 (50%) 0 10 (21%) ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED 5 (18%) 1 (4%) 3 (17%) 0 0 0 9 (19%) NEUTROPENIA 1 (4%) 5 (18%) 0 3 (17%) 0 0 9 (19%) ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED 4 (14%) 1 (4%) 3 (17%) 0 0 0 8 (17%) ANAEMIA 3 (11%) 1 (4%) 2 (11%) 0 1 (50%) 0 7 (15%) PRURITUS 3 (11%) 0 3 (17%) 0 0 0 6 (13%) UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION 5 (18%) 0 1 (6%) 0 0 0 6 (13%) CONSTIPATION 4 (14%) 0 1 (6%) 0 0 0 5 (10%) MUCOSAL INFLAMMATION 3 (11%) 1 (4%) 1 (6%) 0 0 0 5 (10%) Figure 1. Mean IPI-145 Concentration vs Time Plot with Tx Arms Overlaid for the First 6 Hours (Linear) Figure 1. Mean IPI-145 Concentration vs Time Plot with Tx Arms Overlaid for the First 6 Hours (Linear) Disclosures Flinn: Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Berdeja:Curis: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Study of ACTR087 in Combination with Rituximab, in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory CD20-Positive B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 244-244
Author(s):  
Javier Munoz ◽  
Samantha Jaglowski ◽  
Matthew S. McKinney ◽  
Iris Isufi ◽  
Patrick J. Stiff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Dose Levels

Background: The Antibody-Coupled T-cell Receptor (ACTR) platform is an autologous engineered T-cell therapy that combines the cell-killing ability of T cells and the tumor-targeting ability of co-administered antibodies to exert potent antitumor immune responses. ACTR087 comprises the extracellular domain of CD16 linked to a CD3ζ-signaling domain and a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain. Here we present the clinical experience from Study ATTCK-20-2 (NCT02776813), a multicenter, phase 1 study of ACTR087 in combination with rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD20+ NHL. Methods: The main objectives of this first-in-human study were to evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of ACTR087+rituximab. Other objectives included evaluating ACTR T-cell persistence and other correlative biomarkers. Subjects must have had CD20+ NHL that was R/R after prior treatments, which must have included anti-CD20 antibody-containing chemotherapy. Subjects received lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) for 3 days, followed by rituximab and a single dose of ACTR087. Additional doses of rituximab were administered q3w until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Investigator decision. The study included a dose escalation phase (increasing doses of ACTR087) and an expansion phase (ACTR087 at the preliminary recommended phase 2 dose [RP2D]); all subjects received rituximab at a fixed dose of 375 mg/m2 q3w. Results: Two dose levels (DL) of ACTR087 were evaluated during dose escalation (n=17). The MTD was exceeded at DL2, with severe cases of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Statistical analysis of the relationship between non-hematologic toxicity and ACTR+ T-cell doses was retrospectively performed (two-parameter Bayesian logistic regression model) to estimate an RP2D of 35×106 ACTR+ T cells. Nine subjects enrolled in an expansion cohort and received ACTR087 at this RP2D in combination with rituximab. Among all subjects treated (n=26), the majority (69%) were diagnosed with DLBCL. Subjects had received a median of 3 (range 1-9) prior lines of therapy, with 77% having received ≥3 prior lines. ACTR087 showed dose-dependent expansion with peak levels generally observed 7 to 14 days post administration. In subjects with ongoing clinical response (CR), ACTR remained detectable through the last timepoint evaluated. Across all cohorts, Grade ≥3 TEAEs reported in &gt;3 subjects regardless of causality were limited to hematologic events. Potential T cell-mediated toxicities were observed, including 4 serious cases of CRS (Gr 4 in 2 subjects, both with fatal sepsis) and 2 serious cases of neurotoxicity (1 Gr 5, 1 Gr 4 in a subject with fatal septic shock). Elevated baseline inflammatory markers (eg, ferritin, CRP) were observed in patients who developed Gr ≥3 CRS and neurotoxicity post ACTR087. Of note, severe CRS presented without fever and events occurred &gt;7 days post ACTR087. Clinical activity was reported with an ORR of 50% in all dose levels tested, including durable complete responses, with one subject in CR for 869+ days (Table 1). Conclusions: ACTR087+rituximab demonstrated antitumor activity, with observed safety events that are expected with other autologous T-cell products. The time to onset and clinical presentation of severe CRS and neurotoxicity events in this study informed the safety monitoring and adverse reaction management guidance across clinical studies of ACTR T-cell products. Data from this first-in-human study of ACTR087+rituximab confirm the proof of concept and will be used to guide further development for the ACTR platform. Updated clinical data, as well as expanded biomarker correlations to efficacy and safety, will be presented. Disclosures Munoz: Pharmacyclics /Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Fosunkite: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Kyowa: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Portola: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy. Jaglowski:Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board. Isufi:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy. Stiff:Gamida-Cell: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Cellectar: Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Sachs:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Ranger:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Harris:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Payumo:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Akard:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau.

A Dose Escalation Study of Ibrutinib with Lenalidomide for Relapsed and Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1987-1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Pollyea ◽  
Steven Coutre ◽  
Lia Gore ◽  
Nichole Adler ◽  
Pamela Harris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma ◽  
Bcr Signaling ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) is dependent upon dysregulated signaling through the B-cell receptor (BCR) pathway. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) mediates BCR signaling, and inhibition of BTK with ibrutinib, a selective, irreversible BTK inhibitor, is effective and well tolerated for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL. However, complete remissions (CRs) are infrequent, mechanisms of resistance to single-agent ibrutinib have been identified, and the duration of response beyond 3 years is unknown. Lenalidomide, a multi-functional immunomodulatory agent, is active in CLL/SLL, but limited by tumor flare reactions, which occur secondary to B-cell activation. Ibrutinib and lenalidomide modulate several key overlapping factors involving the CLL tumor microenvironment, and therefore a phase 1 combination study with lenalidomide dose escalation was undertaken. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide in combination with ibrutinib. Secondary objectives included assessments of efficacy, PK/PD, and other mechanistic correlative studies. A 1-month (cycle 0) period of 420 mg of daily oral ibrutinib was administered as a single agent to decrease BCR signaling and mitigate lenalidomide-associated tumor flare. Beginning with the second month (cycle 1), ibrutinib was given concomitantly with lenalidomide. Four dose escalation cohorts of lenalidomide were planned using a 3+3 design; 2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10 mg. After the 2.5 mg cohort, intra-patient dose escalation was employed: in cohort 2, pts received 2.5 mg in week 1 followed by 5 mg subsequently; pts in cohort 3 received 2.5 mg in week 1, 5 mg in week 2 and 7.5 mg subsequently; pts in cohort 4 will receive 2.5 mg in week 1, 5 mg in week 2, 7.5 mg in week 3 and 10 mg subsequently. Ibrutinib was not dose escalated (420 mg). Pts receive 12 cycles of the combination, after which lenalidomide is discontinued and ibrutinib continues until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Eligible pts had relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL with adequate organ and bone marrow function. Pts who relapsed after stem cell transplantation were excluded. Results: To date, 11 pts were enrolled; 9 are evaluable (1 voluntarily withdrew consent prior to completing 3 cycles, the protocol-defined minimum to be evaluable, and 1 was a screen fail). The median age was 65 (49-81). Eight were male and 8 had CLL. Median Rai stage was 1 (1-4). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-8); 3 were purine analog resistant. Six had bulky (>5 cm) disease. Two had del(17p13.1) and 4 had del(11q22.3). The median number of cycles completed was 8 (range 1-13). Adverse events (AEs) were reported according to the NCI CTCAE v4.0. Possibly related grade 1/2 AEs that occurred in >1 patient included: rash (n=4), muscle cramps (n=3) and abdominal discomfort (n=2). Possibly related grade 3 AEs included neutropenia (n=4), lymphocytosis (n=2), neutropenic fever (n=1), anemia (n=1) and thrombocytopenia (n=1). There was 1 possibly related grade 4 AE, neutropenia, which was pre-defined as DLT, in the 7.5 mg lenalidomide cohort. One patient experienced grade 2 tumor pain, thought to be due to a lenalidomide-associated tumor flare reaction. Four pts required a lenalidomide dose reduction, for neutropenia (n=2) and fatigue (n=2). Six required a treatment hold, of either lenalidomide or both agents, for a median 7 days (2-28), for neutropenia (n=2), anemia (n=1), fatigue/diarrhea (n=1), atrial fibrillation (n=1) and to obtain a lymph node biopsy (n=1). Lymphocytosis was noted in 5 pts, peaking at a median of 22.5 days. The ORR is 100% (9/9), with all responders experiencing PRs. One progressed with Richter’s transformation during cycle 7, 4 months after achieving a PR. All 9 remain alive with a median follow up of 263 days (range 97-391). The 7.5 mg dose cohort is currently being expanded to 6 pts; after the MTD is determined, a 10 patient dose expansion cohort will commence. Conclusions: Ibrutinib with lenalidomide appears to be well tolerated, although lenalidomide dose reductions were common. Tumor flare reactions were rare. Response assessments at higher dose cohorts of lenalidomide are ongoing. Completed phase 1 data, preliminary data from the expansion cohort and correlative findings will be presented. Disclosures Pollyea: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for CLL/SLL. Byrd:Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document