scholarly journals Blockade of IL-15 Utilizing Bnz-1, a Selective γ-Chain Inhibiting Peptide, Is Safe and Has Clinical Activity in Patients with T-Cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia (T-LGLL): Results of a Phase I/II Multi-Center Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2835-2835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan E. Brammer ◽  
Lubomir Sokol ◽  
Yutaka Tagaya ◽  
Kerry Rogers ◽  
Anjali Mishra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Weekly Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia

T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL) is an incurable, and likely under-diagnosed leukemia characterized by abnormal clonal proliferation of CD8+ memory T-cells. The clonal outgrowth of T-LGLL cells can lead to the development of profound neutropenia and anemia which results in frequent infections, transfusion dependence, and impairment in quality of life and lifespan. There have been few prospective clinical trials in this disease, and no drugs have been FDA approved for its treatment. The primary driver of leukemogenesis in T-LGLL is known to be interleukin-15 (IL-15), a gamma-chain cytokine that induces proliferation of T-LGLL cells. BNZ-1 is a novel pegylated peptide antagonist that inhibits IL-15 by binding to the common γ-chain receptor for cytokines IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-9, IL-15, and IL-21. Studies utilizing BNZ-1 in vitro on T-LGLL cell lines, and ex vivo on clinical patient samples demonstrated significant inhibition of downstream signaling and increased LGLL cell apoptosis (Wang et al., Leukemia 2018). Given these results, we conducted a phase I/II dose escalation study to evaluate the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and preliminary efficacy of BNZ-1 in T-LGLL (NCT03239393). Patients with T-LGLL were eligible if they had one or more of the following: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <500 cells/m3, neutropenia with recurrent infections, or symptomatic or transfusion-dependent anemia. Diagnosis of T-LGLL required: >400/mm3 CD3+CD57+ cells or >650 mm3 CD8+ cells, with a clonal T-cell receptor rearrangement. No prior therapy within 30 days or 5 half-lives was permitted. MTD was evaluated using a standard 3+3 design; with a dose escalation strategy using four doses of BNZ-1: 0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 2 mg/kg, and 4 mg/kg. BNZ-1 was administered by infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 4-week cycle. Patients then had the option to enter the 3-month extension period, at the same weekly dose. Efficacy was determined utilizing criteria from the ECOG5998 study in T-LGLL. CR was defined as complete normalization of blood counts. Partial response (PR) in neutropenic patients was determined by 4 weeks or greater response with ANC >500 cells/mm3 if >/=50% improvement from baseline. For transfusion-dependent anemia patients, a >/=50% decrease in monthly transfusions for at least 2 months was required for a PR. For patients with symptomatic anemia, improvement in hemoglobin >/=1 g/dL with improvement in symptoms constituted a PR. Patients with a response were permitted to remain on a long-term extension (LTE). Eighteen patients, at 3 US centers were enrolled on study including: 3 patients at 0.5 mg/kg, 4 at 1 mg/kg, 5 at 2 mg/kg, and 6 at 4 mg/kg. 10 patients were enrolled for neutropenia, 4 for transfusion dependent anemia, 2 for symptomatic anemia, and 2 with anemia and neutropenia. 15 patients (83%) completed all 16 weeks of treatment, 2 patients declined to enter the extension phase, and one patient on the 2 mg/kg dosage was taken off study at 4 weeks due to neutropenia <100 thought secondary to T-LGLL. One patient developed grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia, which was thought possibly due to study drug though was grade 1 at baseline.The MTD was not reached. Four patients attained a PR: 3 patients with transfusion-dependent anemia became transfusion independent, while one patient with neutropenia had significant resolution of her neutropenia (Table). These three patients remain on the LTE, though one patient is under observation. Correlative studies demonstrated apoptosis of T-LGLL cells on flow cytometry utilizing CD3 T-cell gating within 24 hours of the first dosage of BNZ-1 (a representative example is shown in the Figure), confirming in patients that inhibition of IL-15 induces apoptosis of T-LGLL cells. In this Phase I/II clinical trial, IL-15 blockade utilizing BNZ-1 demonstrated increased apoptosis in patients with T-LGLL, with early evidence of clinical response, particularly amongst patients with transfusion-dependent anemia. Remarkably, these patients remained transfusion-independent while on BNZ-1. The MTD was not reached in this cohort of patients, and there were minimal AEs associated with BNZ-1. Further analysis of responding patients is underway to determine the most effective approach utilizing BNZ-1 in this rare disease. Table Disclosures Brammer: Celgene: Research Funding; Seatlle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Tagaya:Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioniz: Research Funding. Rogers:AbbVie: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Waldmann:Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Azimi:Bioniz: Employment. Frohna:Bioniz: Employment. Ratnayake:Bioniz: Employment. Loughran:Bioniz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Keystone Nano: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals A Multi-Center, Open Label, Phase I/II Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Tenalisib Given in Combination with Romidepsin in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 8-10
Author(s):  
Swami P. Iyer ◽  
Auris Huen ◽  
Bradley Haverkos ◽  
Weiyun Z. Ai ◽  
Craig Okada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Family Member ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Background: T cell lymphomas (TCL) have been known to exhibit epigenetic dysregulation and aberrant cell signaling. Tenalisib (RP6530), a highly selective PI3K δ/γ+SIK3 inhibitor has shown clinically promising activity as a single agent in TCL with a differentiated and favorable safety profile. In vitro studies in TCL cell lines showed increased apoptosis when tenalisib was combined with romidepsin (Rhizen data on file). A Phase I/II study of tenalisib in combination with romidepsin was designed to assess safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy in relapsed/refractory TCL (NCT03770000). Methods: This is a multi-center, open label, Phase I/II study in patients with T cell lymphoma (PTCL and CTCL). The Phase I is a 3+3 dose escalation study to determine the MTD/optimal dose. The Phase II is an expansion cohort at the MTD/optimal dose of the combination. Tenalisib was administered orally at doses of 400, 600 and 800 mg BID in combination with romidepsin (12 &14 mg/m2, Q3W). The objectives of the study are to establish safety, MTD/optimal dose, pharmacokinetics and anti-tumor activity of the combination. We report the dose escalation results and preliminary data from the expansion cohorts. Results: A total 15 patients were enrolled between July 24, 2019 and July 20, 2020. Baseline demographics are presented in Table 1. Patients had a median of 3 (range; 1-17) prior treatments and 11 (73%) were refractory to their last therapy. About 67% (6/9) of CTCL patients had prior mogamulizumab therapy. No DLT was reported in the dose escalation phase and Tenalisib 800 mg BID+ Romidepsin 14 mg/m2, Q3W was considered as the optimal dose for expansion cohorts. PK analysis showed linear and dose-dependent kinetics for tenalisib. Co-administration of romidepsin along with tenalisib did not significantly alter the mutual PK of either agents. Fifteen patients were assessed for safety. Most common treatment emergent adverse events of any grade were nausea (33%), thrombocytopenia (33%) and fatigue (27%). Related ≥ Grade 3 AEs were seen in 5 (33%) patients. These included thrombocytopenia (7%), atrial fibrillation (7%) and pyrexia (7%) which were related to romidepsin while anemia (7%) neutropenia (7%) and rash (7%) were considered related to the combination. There were no instances of transaminitis or colitis. None of the TEAEs led to study discontinuation. Patients from the dose escalation cohorts (n=9) were evaluated for response. Three patients (3/9) showed complete response (CR), 4 patients (4/9) showed stable disease (SD) while 2 patients (2/9) had progressive disease (PD). Out of the three responders, two were PTCL (AITL) patients, one of which is planned for transplantation, while the third patient was a CTCL (Sezary syndrome) patient who had progressed on prior mogamulizumab therapy. This patient showed rapid reduction of Sezary cell count after 2 cycles of treatment. Three patients (2 CR, 1 SD) are currently ongoing with a median duration of response being 9.0 (range; 7.6-10.5+) months. The expansion cohort has 6 patients and is currently enrolling. Conclusions: The combination of tenalisib and romidepsin demonstrates a favorable safety profile and promising indicators of combined anti-tumour activity in patients with R/R TCL. The expansion cohort in CTCL and PTCL is currently underway to validate these encouraging early results. Updated results will be presented during the ASH meeting. Disclosures Iyer: Afffimed: Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Curio Biosciences: Honoraria; Trillium: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Target Oncology: Honoraria; Spectrum: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; CRISPR: Research Funding. Huen:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Miragen: Research Funding; Helsinn: Consultancy; Medivir: Research Funding. Haverkos:Viracta THerapeutics: Consultancy. Ai:ADC Therapeutics, Kymera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nurix Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kuzel:Eselixis, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genomic Health: Honoraria; Sanofi/Genzyme: Honoraria; Bioarray: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Marck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alderuccio:ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Inovio Pharmaceuticals: Other: Family member; Foundation Medicine: Other: Family member; Puma Biotechnology: Other: Family member; Forma Therapeutics: Other: Family member; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Other: Family member; Oncinfo: Honoraria; OncLive: Honoraria. Stevens:Amgen, MorphoSys: Consultancy. Feldman:Viracta: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Trillium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Corvus: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Other, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Eisai: Research Funding. Jagadeesh:Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Debiopharm Group: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding. Reddy:KITE Pharma, Abbvie, BMS, Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech, BMS: Research Funding. Routhu:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A&gt;.: Current Employment. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A: Current Employment. Nair:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Current Employment.

scholarly journals Blinatumomab in Combination with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors of PD-1 and CTLA-4 in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) CD19 Positive B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): Preliminary Results of a Phase I Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 557-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Webster ◽  
Marlise R. Luskin ◽  
Gabrielle T. Prince ◽  
Amy E. DeZern ◽  
Daniel J. DeAngelo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Related Reaction

Abstract Background: Blinatumomab, a CD19/CD3 bispecific T cell engager antibody construct, leads to improved outcomes in patients with R/R CD19+ ALL compared to standard chemotherapy. However, most adults fail to achieve complete remission (CR) with blinatumomab, and the median duration of remission is only 7.3 months. Preclinical studies have shown significantly increased PD-L1 expression on leukemic blasts in patients who are refractory to or relapse after response to blinatumomab. Additionally, expression of the exhaustion markers PD-1 and TIM-3 on bone marrow (BM) CD3+ T cells is significantly higher among ALL patients than controls. The addition of PD-1 blockade +/- CTLA-4 blockade to blinatumomab and ALL blasts in vitro leads to increased T cell proliferation and enhanced blinatumomab-mediated cytotoxicity (Feucht et al, Oncotarget 2016). Thus, blockade of co-inhibitory pathways represents a viable strategy to enhance blinatumomab efficacy. We describe early results of a multi-center phase I study combining blinatumomab with monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1 (nivolumab) +/- CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) in R/R CD19+ ALL. Methods: This phase I dose-escalation study evaluates the safety and tolerability (MTD) of blinatumomab in combination with nivolumab +/- ipilimumab using a 3+3 design. Patients ≥16 years-old with R/R CD19+ Pre-B ALL or MPAL are eligible including those with prior blinatumomab and/or prior allogeneic transplant (allo-SCT). Patients ≥60 years may be untreated and those 16-21 must be R/R to ³2 lines of therapy. The trial started at dose level (DL) A1 (Fig. 1). Upon determining the MTD for the combination of blinatumomab and nivolumab, dose escalation will add ipilimumab (DLB1). Patients may receive up to 5 cycles of blinatumomab and 1 year of nivolumab/ipilimumab. Patients achieving CR may proceed to allo-SCT. Patients removed from the study during the blinatumomab lead-in (days 1-10) will be replaced. Results: As of July 31, 2018, 8 adults (4 males/4 females) had enrolled at DLA1. The median age was 55 (range, 25-75) and baseline BM blast percentage was 73% (range, 8-98%). Baseline characteristics are presented in Figure 2. Seven patients received cytoreduction before treatment (6 steroids only and 1 steroids + Cytoxan). Two patients previously treated with blinatumomab were withdrawn from the study during the blinatumomab lead-in (1 for G3 pericardial effusion 2/2 disease progression and 1 for G3 hyperbilirubinemia). Among the 5 patients who received nivolumab to date, drug-related non-hematologic AEs of grade ≥3 included elevated AST (20%), ALT (20%), amylase (20%), and lipase (G4, 20%); hypophosphatemia (20%); rash (20%); infusion-related reaction (G4, 20%); and hypotension (20%). The elevated AST, ALT, amylase and lipase occurred prior to nivolumab dosing and resolved. One patient was removed from the study for a G4 infusion-related reaction following the 2nd dose of nivolumab that was considered a DLT. One patient in CR developed G4 neutropenia in cycles 2 + 3 but recovered spontaneously. Among the 5 evaluable patients, 4 (80%) achieved CR without MRD (2 after 1 cycle and 2 after 2 cycles of blinatumomab) with 3 ongoing remissions (median f/u 5 months) and 1 extramedullary relapse at day 125. Data on biomarkers including changes in T cell subpopulations in both BM and PB, and co-signaling molecule expression will be presented. Conclusions: Combination therapy with blinatumomab and nivolumab in R/R ALL with is feasible with acceptable toxicity. The MRD-negative CR rate was (80%) despite heavily pre-treated patients with significant baseline disease burden. The last patient treated at DLA1 is undergoing treatment before dose escalation to include ipilimumab. Disclosures DeAngelo: Shire: Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Luznik:WIndMIL Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Gojo:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Merck inc: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Final Results of Phase 1/1b Study of Tenalisib, Dual PI3K δ/γ Inhibitor in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2831-2831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swaminathan P. Iyer ◽  
Brad M. Haverkos ◽  
Jasmine Zain ◽  
Radhakrishnan Ramchandren ◽  
Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees

Introduction: Tenalisib (RP6530) is a novel, highly specific, dual PI3K δ/γ inhibitor with nano-molar inhibitory potency at the enzyme and cellular level. PI3K plays a critical role in T-cell development and activation and several studies have validated the PI3K-AKT pathway as a potential therapeutic target in T cell lymphomas. Preliminary results of the ongoing Phase 1/1b T-cell lymphoma (TCL) study demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with encouraging clinical activity in relapsed/refractory TCL (Oki, ASCO 2018 and Iyer, ASH 2018). We now present the final results of the study (NCT02567656). Methods: This study comprised of four-dose escalation cohorts, followed by two dose expansion cohorts at MTD enrolling 20 patients each in PTCL and CTCL cohorts. Patients had histologically confirmed TCL, ECOG PS ≤2, and had received ≥1 prior therapy. Patients received Tenalisib [200 mg BID-800 mg BID (fasting), 800 mg (fed only)] orally until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were to determine the MTD and pharmacokinetic profile. The secondary objective was to evaluate overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. Responses were evaluated for PTCL and CTCL based on IWG criteria (Cheson 2007) and mSWAT respectively. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in study, 19 in dose escalation and 39 in dose expansion (28 PTCL and 30 CTCL). Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1-15). Safety assessment of 58 patients receiving at least one dose of Tenalisib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. Treatment related Grade≥3 AEs were elevated ALT/AST (21%), rash (5%), and hypophosphatemia (3%). These events were reversible and managed by withholding study drug. Additionally, in few patients (N=9), steroids were used to manage elevated ALT/AST. There were six treatment related serious adverse events, none of these led to fatal outcome. At end of the study, four (3 CTCL; 1 PTCL) patients who completed minimum 8 cycles of therapy were rolled over to a compassionate use study (NCT03711604) and were followed up. Efficacy assessments demonstrated an ORR of 46% (3 CR and 13 PR) and clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) of 77%. Subset efficacy analysis showed an ORR in PTCL of 47% (3 CR; 4 PR) and in CTCL of 45% (9 PR). The median time to initial response was 1.8 months and was similar in both sub-types. The overall median DOR was 4.91 months (range 0.9-26.6); in PTCL patients the DOR was 6.53 months, (range: 0.97-21.0) and 3.8 months (range: 1.67-25.67) in CTCL patients. In 3 PTCL patients who achieved CR, the median DOR was 19.5 months (range 7.5-21). Conclusion: Tenalisib demonstrated promising clinical activity and an improved safety profile in patients with relapsed/ refractory TCL. Currently, a phase I/II combination study to further evaluate safety and efficacy with romidepsin is ongoing in this target population. Disclosures Iyer: Arog: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Korman:Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa: Research Funding; Leo: Research Funding; Menlo: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Principia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Sun: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syntimmune: Research Funding; UCB: Research Funding; Valeant: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Dermira: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Routhu:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Nair:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Huen:Galderma Inc: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline Inc: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

A Phase I Study of Selinexor in Combination with Daunorubicin and Cytarabine in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Poor-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4040-4040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendra L. Sweet ◽  
Rami S. Komrokji ◽  
Eric Padron ◽  
Christopher L Cubitt ◽  
Leyla Khavarian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Poor Risk

Abstract Background: Induction chemotherapy for older adults with poor-risk AML has remained largely unchanged over the past 40 years, with complete remission (CR) rates ranging from 20-50%. Five-year overall survival (OS) ranges from 2-15%, illustrating the need for novel treatment strategies. Selinexor is an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) that has shown promising single agent activity in AML (NCT01607892). By inhibiting the primary export protein, XPO1, selinexor localizes tumor suppressor proteins to the nucleus leading to their activation. Furthermore, selinexor inhibits DNA damage repair, rationalizing its use in combination with DNA damaging agents. Preclinical data from our institution suggest Selinexor synergizes with daunorubicin when used in CD34+ AML cells. Here we report early results from a phase I clinical trial with selinexor plus cytarabine and daunorubicin in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed, poor-risk AML. Methods: This is a single institution phase I clinical trial with a 3+3 design and an expansion phase at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The primary endpoint was to determine the MTD/RP2D of selinexor. Secondary endpoints included rate of CR/CRi, overall survival (OS), relapse free survival (RFS) and toxicity assessment. Eligible pts had a diagnosis of previously untreated AML (non-M3), with poor-risk features based on karyotype, mutational profile, secondary AML (sAML) arising from an antecedent hematologic disorder (AHD) or prior chemotherapy, or age ≥60 years. Prior treatment for an AHD was allowed. Induction included daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 and cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day CIVI days 1-7 (7+3) with two dose cohorts of selinexor: 60 mg and 80 mg PO. Selinexor was given on days 1, 3, 8, 10, 15 and 17. Re-induction with 5+2 plus selinexor was allowed if indicated. Once in CR, pts received 1-2 cycles of consolidation with 5+2 plus selinexor followed by maintenance selinexor on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle for up 12 months. Selinexor was given at the same dose for all phases of the study. Pts could proceed to hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) at any time after achieving CR. Results: 21 pts (14 (67%) M / 7 (33%) F) were enrolled from June 2015 to June 2016. Median age was 68 years (range 37-77); 18 (86%) were age ≥60 and 9 (43%) were age ≥70. Nineteen (90%) pts were considered poor-risk (unrelated to age), and two (10%) were eligible due to age ≥60 only. Each cohort enrolled 4 pts, and 13 pts were enrolled in the expansion. One pt in each cohort was replaced before completing the 28-day DLT period; one withdrew consent and the second died on day 23 from acute renal failure related to antibiotics. At data cutoff, 18 pts were included in the safety and efficacy assessment. Three additional patients have not completed induction. The early death rate (≤60 days) was 4.8%. No DLTs occurred in the dose-escalation cohorts. The MTD of selinexor was not reached and the RP2D was 80 mg twice weekly. The most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic, treatment emergent AEs in all pts were febrile neutropenia (56%), diarrhea (22%), hyponatremia (22%) and sepsis (17%). Nine patients (50%) achieved CR/CRi. Of the 14 pts treated at the RP2D (selinexor 80 mg), 6 (43%) achieved CR/CRi. In the entire cohort, the median age of the responders was 69 (61-77) and 4 (44%) were age ≥70. Seven (78%) were considered high-risk. Four (44%) had sAML. Two (22%) required a second induction. The median time to response was 47 days (range 28-77) At a median follow up of 8.7 months in the 9 responding pts, 7 (78%) remain in remission. Overall, 4 pts (44%) underwent HCT, and 1 (11%) relapsed just prior to HCT. Conclusion: Results from this phase I trial suggest that selinexor 80mg PO twice weekly can be safely administered in combination with induction chemotherapy using cytarabine and daunorubicin to pts with poor-risk AML, including older pts. The most prominent AEs were febrile neutropenia, diarrhea and hyponatremia. Response rates are encouraging and many elderly pts proceeded to transplant, suggesting this regimen warrants further investigation in this challenging population. Disclosures Sweet: Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Komrokji:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sullivan:Karyopharm: Research Funding. Shah:Incyte: Research Funding; Rosetta Genomics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Real-World Outcomes for Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Treated with Tisagenlecleucel: Update from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Registry

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 428-428
Author(s):  
Samuel John ◽  
Michael A. Pulsipher ◽  
Amy Moskop ◽  
Zhen-Huan Hu ◽  
Christine L. Phillips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Advisory Boards

Abstract Background: Tisagenlecleucel is an autologous CD19-directed T-cell immunotherapy indicated in the USA for treatment of patients up to 25 years (y) of age with B-cell ALL that is refractory or in second or later relapse. Overall response rate was 82% with 24 months' (mo) follow-up in the registrational ELIANA trial [Grupp et al. Blood 2018]; pooled data from ELIANA and ENSIGN revealed similar outcomes upon stratification by age (&lt;18y and ≥18y) [Rives et al. HemaSphere 2018]. Early real-world data for tisagenlecleucel from the CIBMTR registry reported similar efficacy to ELIANA with no new safety signals [Pasquini et al. Blood Adv 2020]. Outcomes are reported here for patients who received tisagenlecleucel in the real-world setting, stratified by age (&lt;18y and ≥18y). Methods: This noninterventional prospective study used data from the CIBMTR registry and included patients aged ≤25y with R/R ALL. Eligible patients received commercial tisagenlecleucel after August 30, 2017, in the USA or Canada. Age-specific analyses were conducted in patients aged &lt;18y and ≥18y at the time of infusion. Efficacy was assessed in patients with ≥12mo follow-up at each reporting center and included best overall response (BOR) of complete remission (CR), duration of response (DOR), event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety was evaluated in all patients who completed the first (100-day) assessment. Adverse events (AEs) of interest - including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity - were monitored throughout the reporting period. CRS and neurotoxicity were graded using the ASTCT criteria. Results: As of October 30, 2020, data from 451 patients were collected, all of whom received tisagenlecleucel. The median time from receipt of leukapheresis product at the manufacturing site to shipment was 27 days (interquartile range: 25-34). Patients aged ≥18y appeared to have greater disease burden at baseline than those aged &lt;18y, indicated by lower rates of morphologic CR and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity prior to infusion. Older patients were also more heavily pre-treated before infusion. All other patient characteristics at baseline were comparable between the two groups (Table 1). In the efficacy set (median follow-up 21.5mo; range 11.9-37.2; N=322), BOR of CR was 87.3% (95% CI 83.1-90.7); MRD status was available for 150 patients, of whom 98.7% were MRD negative. Median DOR was 23.9mo (95% CI 12.3-not estimable [NE]), median EFS was 14.0mo (9.8-24.8) and median RFS was 23.9mo (13.0-NE); 12mo EFS and RFS were 54.3% and 62.3%, respectively. For OS, the median was not reached. Efficacy outcomes were generally similar across age groups (Table 1). In the safety set (median follow-up 20.0mo; range 2.6-37.2; N=400), most AEs of interest occurred within 100 days of infusion. Any-grade CRS was observed in 58.0% of patients; Grade ≥3 in 17.8%. Treatment for CRS included tocilizumab (n=113; 28.3% of all patients) and corticosteroids (n=31; 7.8%). Neurotoxicity was observed in 27.3% of patients; Grade ≥3 in 10.0%. Treatment for neurotoxicity included tocilizumab (n=17; 4.3% of all patients) and corticosteroids (n=28; 7.0%). During the reporting period, 82 (20.5%) patients died; the most common cause of death was recurrence/persistence/progression of primary disease. CRS and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome were the primary cause of death in 2 patients and 1 patient, respectively. Overall, safety data were similar across age groups, although more patients aged ≥18y experienced any-grade CRS or neurotoxicity and were subsequently treated (Table 1). Conclusions: Updated registry data for pediatric and young adult patients with R/R ALL treated with tisagenlecleucel revealed that patients aged ≥18y had a greater disease burden and were more heavily pre-treated at baseline than patients aged &lt;18y. The overall efficacy and safety profiles of commercial tisagenlecleucel reflected those observed in the clinical trial setting [Grupp et al. Blood 2018; Rives et al. HemaSphere 2018] and were broadly consistent across age groups. Some important differences between the &lt;18y and ≥18y groups were identified, which may point to challenges in timely identification and/or referral of older patients for CAR-T cell therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pulsipher: Equillium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Research Funding; Jasper Therapeutics: Honoraria. Hu: Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Phillips: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Margossian: Cue Biopharma, Inc.: Current Employment; Novartis: Other: Ad hoc Advisory Boards. Nikiforow: Kite/Gilead: Other: Ad hoc advisory boards; Novartis: Other: Ad hoc advisory boards; Iovance: Other: Ad hoc advisory boards; GlaxoSmithKline (GSK): Other: Ad hoc advisory boards. Martin: Novartis: Other: Local PI for clinical trial; Bluebird Bio: Other: Local PI for clinical trial. Rouce: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Tiwari: Novartis Healthcare private limited: Current Employment. Redondo: Novartis: Current Employment. Willert: Novartis: Current Employment. Agarwal: Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Pasquini: Kite Pharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Grupp: Novartis, Roche, GSK, Humanigen, CBMG, Eureka, and Janssen/JnJ: Consultancy; Novartis, Kite, Vertex, and Servier: Research Funding; Novartis, Adaptimmune, TCR2, Cellectis, Juno, Vertex, Allogene and Cabaletta: Other: Study steering committees or scientific advisory boards; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Steering committee, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Size Matters: Identification of Larger Size CD19 Positive Extracellular Vesicles in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia That Inhibit Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Functions

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1865-1865
Author(s):  
Cynthia L. Forsman ◽  
Reona Sakemura ◽  
Fabrice Lucien-Matteoni ◽  
Elizabeth Juarez-Diaz ◽  
Nan Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Profile ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Effector Functions ◽  
Cell Functions ◽  
Cd19 Expression

Abstract Introduction: Unprecedented clinical outcomes were reported after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) therapy and led to their FDA approval in diffuse large B cell lymphoma and in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, the complete response rate in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) after CART19 therapy is much lower, at approximately 20-30%, and the mechanism(s) for this relative lack of success is unclear. The dominant known mechanism(s) that prevent successful CART cell therapy in CLL have been limited to CART expansion and poor persistence. However, potential mechanisms are not limited to the CLL T-cell. Several immune defects have been identified in CLL that result from the complex bi-directional interaction between B-CLL cells and their microenvironment. In CLL the leukemic microenvironment is rich with extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by B-CLL cells. There is growing evidence that these vesicles play an important role in intracellular communication by the delivery of growth factors, genetic material and microenvironmentally relevant molecules. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the role and interactions of EVs in the diminished or absent CART response seen in some CLL patients. Methods: EVs were isolated from peripheral blood of 16 patients with untreated CLL at different Rai stages (8 patients had early and 8 had advanced stage disease) and risk profile by FISH (8 patients had low risk and 8 patients had high risk disease, based on the presence of 17p deletion). Cytometry was used to determine size, number of particles per µl, Annexin V and CD19 expression. These variables were correlated to the Rai stage and risk category of the disease. To investigate the impact of EVs on CART cell functions, CART19 cells were stimulated with either CLL EVs alone or in combination with the CD19 positive cell line JeKo1. After coincubation different effector functions were analysed. Results: Two patterns of EVs in CLL patients were identified; a single versus two distinct EV size populations (small [EVssmall]; 50-240nm, median=110nm) and large [EVslarge]; 180-560nm, median = 360nm Fig 1.A). In 25% of patients, EVs were CD19 positive (EVCD19+). CD19 positivity was detected only in patients with the EVslarge (Fig 1.B). The EVs concentration, CD19 expression (EVsCD19+ vs EVsCD19-), or the size (EVssmall vs EVslarge) did not correlate with disease stage (early vs advanced Rai stage) or risk profile of CLL (low vs high risk) although some variation could be seen (Fig 1.C). To investigate our hypothesis that EVs could modulate CART19 function, CART19 cell effector functions were examined in the presence of EVsCD19+, EVsCD19-, EVssmall, or EVslarge. EVs, 1.5x10e5 particles, alone were insufficient to stimulate CART19 cells. However when CART19 cells were stimulated with the CD19 positive cell line JeKo1, their effector functions were reduced only in the presence of EVsCD19+, 50,000 particles, 2.5 x 10e3/ µl, but not EVsCD19- at the same concentration. This included a significant reduction in CART specific killing (Fig 1.D) and a reduction in cytokine production. The impairment of CART cell functions was independent of the size of EVs, i.e. there was no impairment of CART functions with large or small size EVCD19- in co-culture. Summary: We identify CD19 positive large size EVs from patients with CLL and demonstrate that these EVs play a role in the leukemic microenvironment by reducing CART cell activity. Studies are ongoing to define the mechanism(s). Disclosures Parikh: Janssen: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kay:Cytomx Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Infinity Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kenderian:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Humanigen: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties.

scholarly journals Phase I/II Study of Escalating Doses of Thalidomide in Conjunction with Bortezomib and High Dose Melphalan As a Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2154-2154
Author(s):  
Noa Biran ◽  
Shijia Zhang ◽  
Scott D. Rowley ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Michele L. Donato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Abstract Background: A regimen of escalating doses of thalidomide, in combination with bortezomib and high dose melphalan (Mel/Vel/Thal) was evaluated as a conditioning regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) in a phase I/II study. Methods: Patients received Mel/Vel/Thal as a second of tandem ASCT if they achieved <CR to their first ASCT (tandem), or as conditioning for a salvage ASCT (salvage). Exclusion criteria were dose-intense therapy within 56 days, uncontrolled infections, severe organ dysfunction, Karnofsky score <70%, or painful grade 2 or greater peripheral neuropathy. Conditioning consisted of Vel 1.6 mg/m2 intravenously on days -4 and -1 with Mel 200 mg/m2 on day -2. Thal was given on days -5 through -1 and was administered in a planned step-wise dose escalation of 600, 800 and 1000 mg (in cohorts of 3 pts). Dexamethasone (Dex) 10-20 mg was given prior to Vel and Mel. All pts received G-CSF every other day starting day +3 until engraftment. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were graded according to CTCAE version 3. Results: Twenty-nine pts were enrolled: 9 in the phase 1 dose-escalation phase and an additional 20 pts in phase 2. In the phase I portion, all pts experienced somnolence, with grade 3 occurring in 1 pt at the 800 mg/day dose. Subsequently, Dex 40 mg was given with first dose of Thal at the 1000 mg level with decreased severity of somnolence. No dose limiting toxicities defined as ≥ grade 4 non-hematological SAEs occurred in the phase I portion, allowing full dose escalation with 9 pts enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose for Thal was not reached and the 1000 mg dose was chosen for the phase 2 dose expansion. No regimen related mortality occurred in either phase I or phase II portion of the study. All SAEs except lethargy and dizziness occurred after ASCT and were not attributed to Thal. The most common grade 1 and 2 non-hematologic toxicities included nausea (65.5%), mucositis (51.7%), diarrhea (48.3%), somnolence (48.3%), lethargy (27.6%), and vomiting (17.2%). The most common grade 3 non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were neutropenic fever (58.6%), mucositis (6.9%), and somnolence (13.8%), which increased risk of falls. SAEs included somnolence (13.8%), tumor lysis syndrome (3.4%), and engraftment syndrome (3.4%). All transplant-related SAEs resolved by day +28 after ASCT. All pts achieved prompt hematological recovery with the median time to ANC >500/uL 10 days (range, 8-14 days), and platelet >20,000 12 days (range 9-26 days). All pts received at least one ASCT prior to enrolling on the study. Seventeen pts (59%) had interim salvage chemotherapy between their upfront and Mel/Vel/Thal ASCT (i.e. received a salvage ASCT), with median time from first to salvage ASCT 29 months. The remaining 12 (41%) went directly from an upfront ASCT Mel-based ASCT to the Mel/Vel/Thal ASCT (tandem ASCT) within 6 months of the first ASCT. Twenty-seven (93%) were Durie-Salmon stage III, and 13 (44%) had >2 prior lines of therapy. Of those who had Mel/Vel/Thal as a salvage ASCT, 70% had ≥3 prior lines of therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) was 69% with 38% complete remission. ORR for Mel/Vel/Thal compared to upfront Mel ASCT was 69% versus 62% with 11 patients achieving CR with Mel/Vel/Thal compared to 5 patients with Mel alone (Figure 1). Ten of 27 evaluable patients (37%) had an upgrade in response in the Mel/Vel/Thal salvage ASCT compared to their upfront ASCT: 2 pts (7%) went from PD to PR, 1 (4%) from SD to CR, 1 (4%) from PR to VGPR; 3 (11%) from PR to CR and 2 (7%) from VGPR to CR. Median PFS and OS were 9.3 and 65.4 months, respectively, with a median follow-up of 17.8 months. Of those who underwent tandem Mel followed by Mel/Vel/Thal ASCT the median PFS was 14.9 months with a median OS not yet reached at time of analysis. For the 17 patients who received a salvage Mel/Vel/Thal ASCT, median PFS from their upfront ASCT was 11.9 months, compared to 9.1 months with the salvage Mel/Vel/Thal ASCT. Conclusions: High-dose Thal up to 1000 mg daily for 5 days can be safely combined with Vel and dose-intense Mel as an ASCT conditioning regimen with acceptable toxicities. Confirmation of potential synergistic effects of this combination regimen will require an appropriately designed phase III study. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Biran: BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Skarbnik:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Siegel:Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals First-in-Human, Phase 1/2 Trial to Assess the Safety and Clinical Activity of Subcutaneous GEN3013 (DuoBody®-CD3×CD20) in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 758-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieternella Lugtenburg ◽  
Rogier Mous ◽  
Michael Roost Clausen ◽  
Martine E.D. Chamuleau ◽  
Peter Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: CD20-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL); however, a significant proportion of patients (pts) present with refractory disease or will experience relapse. GEN3013 (DuoBody®-CD3×CD20) is the first subcutaneously administered IgG1 bispecific antibody (bsAb) that targets the T-cell surface antigen CD3 and the B-cell surface antigen CD20, triggering T-cell-mediated killing of B cells. In vitro, GEN3013 efficiently activates and induces cytotoxic activity of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the presence of B cells (Hiemstra et al. Blood 2018), and results in long-lasting depletion of B cells in cynomolgus monkeys. Subcutaneous (SC) GEN3013 in cynomolgus monkeys resulted in lower plasma cytokine levels, and similar bioavailability and B-cell depletion, compared with intravenous administration. GEN3013 has higher potency in vitro than most other CD3×CD20 bsAbs in clinical development (Hiemstra et al. HemaSphere 2019). SC GEN3013 in pts with B-NHL is being evaluated in a first-in-human, Phase 1/2 trial (NCT03625037), which comprises a dose-escalation part and a dose-expansion part. Here we report preliminary dose-escalation data. Methods: Pts with CD20+ B-NHL with relapsed, progressive, or refractory disease following anti-CD20 mAb treatment, and ECOG PS 0-2 were included. During dose escalation, pts received SC GEN3013 flat dose in 28-day cycles (q1w: cycle 1-2; q2w: cycle 3-6; q4w thereafter) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was mitigated with the use of a priming dose and premedication with corticosteroids, antihistamines, and antipyretics. Primary endpoints were adverse events (AEs) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity (anti-drug antibodies [ADA]), pharmacodynamics (PD) (cytokine measures; laboratory parameters), and anti-tumor activity (tumor size reduction; objective and best response). Results: At data cut-off (June 28, 2019), 18 pts were enrolled into the dose-escalation part of the trial, with safety data available for pts receiving doses starting at 4 µg. Most pts had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n=14) and were heavily pre-treated; 10 pts had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy (overall median [range]: 3 [1-11]). The median age was 58.5 years (range: 21-80), and 13 pts were male. At a median follow-up of 1.9 months, pts received a median of 5 doses (range: 1-14); treatment is ongoing in 6 pts. Twelve pts discontinued treatment due to progressive disease. Six pts died (2 during treatment, 4 during survival follow-up), all due to disease progression and unrelated to treatment. The most common (n≥5) treatment-emergent AEs were pyrexia (n=8), local injection-site reactions (n=7), diarrhea (n=5), fatigue (n=5), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=5). The most common Grade (G) 3/4 AEs were anemia (n=3) and neutropenia (n=3). Despite increasing GEN3013 doses, all CRS events were non-severe (initial observation: 3/8 pts, G1: n=1, G2: n=2; following modification of premedication plan [corticosteroids for 3 days]: 6/10 pts, G1: n=4, G2: n=2). Increases in peripheral cytokine (IL6, IL8, IL10, IFNγ, TNFα) concentrations after GEN3013 dosing correlated with clinical symptoms of CRS in most pts. No pts had tumor lysis syndrome or neurological symptoms. No DLTs were observed. GEN3013 PK profiles reflect SC dosing; Cmax occurred 2-4 days after dosing. No ADAs were detected. PD effects following GEN3013 dosing were observed at dose levels as low as 40 µg and included rapid, complete depletion of circulating B cells (if present after prior anti-CD20 therapy) and peripheral T-cell activation and expansion. The first evidence of clinical activity was observed at a dose level of 120 µg, with complete metabolic response observed in a pt with DLBCL. Conclusions: Subcutaneously administered GEN3013, a potent CD3×CD20 bsAb, shows good tolerability and early evidence of clinical activity at low dose levels in heavily pretreated pts with relapsed or refractory B-NHL. All CRS events were non-severe and did not lead to discontinuation. No DLTs were observed. Dose escalation is ongoing; updated data will be presented. Dose expansion will begin upon determining the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) (NCT03625037). Disclosures Lugtenburg: Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Mous:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Clausen:Abbvie: Other: Travel grant to attend ASH 2019. Johnson:Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Genmab: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Rule:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Napp: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy. Oliveri:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership. DeMarco:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hiemstra:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Warrants. Chen:Genmab: Employment. Azaryan:Genmab: Employment. Gupta:Genmab: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ahmadi:Genmab Inc: Employment, Other: stock and/or warrants. Hutchings:Incyte: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Synergistic Role of Leukemic and Non-Leukemic Immune Repertoires in CD8+ T-Cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia As Identified By Single-Cell Transcriptomics

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1318-1318
Author(s):  
Dipabarna Bhattacharya ◽  
Jani Huuhtanen ◽  
Matti Kankainen ◽  
Tapio Lönnberg ◽  
Cassandra M Kerr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cell Clones ◽  
Tcr Repertoire

Abstract Background: T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL), a rare lymphoproliferative disorder of mature T cells, is characterized by the accumulation of activated effector T cells leading to a clonally restricted T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire. Chronic antigen stimulation together with activating somatic STAT3 mutations have been proposed to lead to clonal expansion of leukemic cells. However, no holistic research has been done to show how leukemic and non-leukemic cells liaise to sustain abnormal immune reactivity in T-LGLL. Methods: We investigated the transcriptome and TCR repertoire in T-LGLL using: 1) single-cell RNA and TCR (scRNA+TCRαβ) sequencing from CD45+ sorted blood cells (T-LGLL n=11, healthy n=6), 2) TCRβ sequencing from blood mononuclear cells (T-LGLL n=48, healthy n=823), 3) bulk RNA sequencing (T-LGLL n=15, healthy n=5), 4) plasma cytokine profiling (T-LGLL n=9, healthy n=9), and 5) flow cytometry validations (T-LGLL n=6, healthy n=6) (Figure) Results: ScRNA+TCRαβ-seq data revealed that in healthy controls, hyperexpanded CD8+ T-cell clones (at least 10 cells with identical TCRs) preferentially had an effector memory phenotype, whereas in T-LGLL, the hyperexpanded clonotypes represented a more cytotoxic (increased expression of GZMB, PRF1, KLRB1) and exhausted (LAG3 and TIGIT) phenotype. Using flow cytometry, we confirmed that upon anti-CD3/CD28/CD49 antibody stimulation, T-LGLL clones (CD8+CD57+) expressed higher levels of cytotoxic proteins (GZMA /GZMB , PRF1) but were deficient in degranulation responses and cytokine secretion as measured by expression of CD107a/b and TNFα/IFNγ, respectively. Focused re-clustering of the extracted T-LGLL clones from the scRNA+TCRαβ-seq data revealed considerable heterogeneity among the T-LGLL clones and partly separated the mutated (mt) STAT3 and wild type (wt) STAT3 clones. STAT3wt clones upregulated T-cell activation and TCR signaling pathways, with a higher cytotoxicity and lower exhaustion score as compared to STAT3mt clones. This was validated with bulk RNA-seq data. To understand the antigen specificities of the T-LGLL clones, we combined previously profiled T-LGLL TCRs with our data to form the largest described dataset of 200 T-LGLL clones from 170 patients. Notably, T-LGLL clones were found to be private to each patient. Furthermore, the analysis by GLIPH2 algorithm grouping TCRs did not reveal detectable structural similarities, suggesting the absence of a unifying antigen in T-LGLL. However, in 67% of T-LGLL patients, the TCRs of leukemic clones shared amino acid level similarities with the rest of the non-leukemic TCR repertoire suggesting that the clonal and non-clonal immune repertoires are connected via common target antigens. To analyze the non-clonal immune repertoire in T-LGLL in detail, we compared our data to other published scRNAseq data from solid tumors (n=4) and hematologic cancers (n=8) and healthy controls (n=6). The analysis revealed that in T-LGLL also the non-leukemic CD8+ and CD4+ T cells were more mature, cytotoxic, and clonally restricted. When compared to healthy controls and other cancer patients, in non-leukemic T-LGLL the most upregulated pathway was IFNγ response. Finally, most of the upregulated cytokines in T-LGLL (e.g., CCL2/3/7, CXCL10/11, IL15RA) were secreted predominantly by monocytes and dendritic cells, which also had upregulated HLA class II expression and enhanced scavenging potential in T-LGLL patients. Ligand-receptor analysis with CellPhoneDB revealed that the number of predicted cell-cell interactions was significantly higher in T-LGLL as compared to reactive T-cell clones in healthy controls. The most co-stimulatory interactions (e.g., CD2-CD58, TNFSF14-TNFRSF14) occurred between the IFNγ secreting T-LGLL clones and the pro-inflammatory cytokine secreting monocytes. Conclusions: Our study shows a synergistic interplay between the leukemic and non-leukemic immune cell repertoires in T-LGLL, where an aberrant antigen-driven immune response including hyperexpanded CD8+ T-LGLL cells, non-leukemic CD8+ cells, CD4+ cells, and monocytes contribute to the persistence of the T-LGLL clones. Our results provide a rationale to prioritize therapies that target the entire immune repertoire and not only the T-LGLL clones in patients with T-LGLL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Loughran: Kymera Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioniz Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Keystone Nano: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dren Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maciejewski: Alexion: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy. Mustjoki: Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Janpix: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

A Phase I/II Trial of Combination Gemcitabine and Bortezomib (VELCADE®) for Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) and Aggressive B-Cell NHL

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1646-1646
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Evens ◽  
Steven T. Rosen ◽  
Leo I. Gordon ◽  
Irene Helenowski ◽  
Justin Kline ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Cycle ◽  
Treatment Schedule ◽  
Dosing Schedule ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1646 Background: NF-κB has been shown to be deregulated in B-NHL and T-NHL subtypes. The proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, has the capacity to reverse the downstream consequences of NF-κB, while gemcitabine has documented single-agent activity in relapsed/refractory NHL. Further, in vitro and murine xenograft tumor models have demonstrated synergy between these two agents. Based on these data, and the continued unmet clinical need for patients with relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL either ineligible for or relapsed after stem cell transplant (SCT), we conducted a phase I/II trial utilizing this novel combination. Methods: This was a phase I/II investigator-initiated clinical trial conducted through two centers. The phase I design was a classic 3+3 with dose escalation of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 to 1.6 mg/m2 given day (D) 1 and D8) with static gemcitabine dosing (800 mg/m2 D1 and D8) given on q 21 day cycles. The definition of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was: a) grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity (other than grade 3 nausea or vomiting); b) grade 4 vomiting despite maximal anti-emetic support; c) grade 4 neutropenia on D1 of a treatment cycle (despite growth factor support); and d) grade 4 thrombocytopenia on D1 of a treatment cycle. Following completion of bortezomib escalation, a planned phase II expansion of the study was planned. The null hypothesis was that the true success was less than or equal to 15% and the alternate hypothesis was that the true success was 40% or higher; type I error of 5% and a power of 80% was assumed. Results: From April 2006 to December 2010, we enrolled 32 relapsed/refractory NHL pts onto this phase I/II clinical trial. Sixteen pts had T-NHL (n=12 peripheral T-NHL NOS and n=1 each with angioimmunoblastic T-NHL, NK-/T-NHL, transformed large cell [from pre-existing cutaneous T-cell], and hepatosplenic) and 16 had B-NHL (all relapsed/refractory DLBCL). There were 16 women and 16 men with a median age of 61 years (range, 37–85 years). The median ECOG performance status was 1 (range, 0–2), median prior therapies were 2.5 (range, 1–5), while 35% had failed prior autologous SCT. During the initial phase I dose escalation, 2 DLTs were noted (grade 3 hypertension and grade 3 elevation of liver function tests), while a maximally tolerated dose was not identified. However, among the first 18 pts treated on the D1+D8 (q21 day) dosing schedule, 67% experienced grade 3/4 neutropenia and/or grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, primarily on D8 of treatment cycles. These recurrent D8 cytopenias resulted in repeated treatment delay(s). The median number of cycles delivered for these 18 pts were 1.0 (due to hematotoxicity), which was associated with a low (59%) median normalized dose-intensity. Thus, in early 2009, the clinical trial was amended instituting a modified treatment schedule of gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 to both be administered on D1 and D15 of a 28-day schedule for an additional 22 patients. Treatment-related toxicity was markedly reduced using this modified treatment schedule; only one grade 3 event each of anemia and thrombocytopenia were recorded. However, after 14 pts had accrued to the modified treatment schedule, efficacy data were analyzed by the Northwestern University Data Monitoring Committee (DMC). Among all 32 patients, the ORR was 16% (complete remission (CR) 13%). Further, the ORR for all B-NHL pts was 6% (no CR) and 25% for T-NHL (19% CR). On the modified D1+D15 treatment schedule, the ORR for B-NHL was 0% (0/8); while among T-NHL, the ORR was 50% (3/6) with each of these latter pts remaining in continued remission at 29+, 26+, and 19+ months. Nevertheless, an analysis performed by the DMC for the overall study conduct recommended premature study closure; thus the final planned 8 pts did not enroll. Conclusions: We determined in this phase I/II study for pts with relapsed/refractory, aggressive T-NHL and B-NHL that combined bortezomib/gemcitabine using a dosing schedule of D1+8 q21 days was not tolerated and is not recommended for further study. Modification of bortezomib/gemcitabine dosing to D1+15 q28 days was tolerated markedly better, allowing consistent treatment delivery. Altogether, clinical efficacy of gemcitabine plus bortezomib in aggressive B-NHL was low (with either schedule), while there was a potential signal of activity with durable responses in a small number of pts in the T-NHL population utilizing the modified treatment schedule. Disclosures: Evens: Millennium: Research Funding, advisory board. Off Label Use: Velcade in T-cell and aggressive (non-MCL) B-cell NHL. Winter:Millennium: Research Funding. Smith:Millennium: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document