Upfront Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Idiopathic Aplastic Anemia: A Study on Behalf of the Saawp of EBMT

Introduction Young patients with idiopathic aplastic anemia (AA) respond better to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) but the long-term outcome is suboptimal with non-response in 30% of patients as well as significant risks of relapse, ciclosporine (CSA) dependence and clonal evolution. Excellent results of up-front unrelated donor (UD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have been reported in a cohort of 29 children with idiopathic AA using an Alemtuzumab-based regimen, with low Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD) rates and only 1 death (Dufour C, BJH 2015). We took advantage of the SAAWP registry of the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) to analyze the outcomes of 65 young patients who received up-front UD HSCT in Europe. Methods : Patients who had received an UD HSCT for AA, between 2010 and 2018, registered in the SAAWP registry were included. Patients who had received IST (CSA or anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)) before HSCT, cord blood, haplo-identical transplant were excluded as well as patients suffering from congenital bone marrow disorders. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 2 years. Secondary endpoints were GVHD-free/relapse-free survival (GRFS) - defined at 2 years as being alive, engrafted without acute GVHD grade III-IV, and extensive chronic GVHD during follow-up. Results : Sixty-five patients were included between 2010 and 2018; median age was 16 years old (9-26). Time to HSCT was 6.5 months (IQR 3.6-11.7). Thirty-nine patients were transplanted from a matched unrelated donor (at least 8/8 HLA matched), 11 patients had mismatched UD (HLA data missing for 14 patients). The two-year overall survival rate was 92% (95% CI, 85-99%) (figure 1,A) with a median follow-up of 32 months (25-43). Main cause of death was infection (2 out of 5 deaths). Failure occurred in 8% (1-15%) of the patients. Acute GVHD grade II-IV was observed in 13% (5-22%) of the patients and Grade III and IV happened for two patients (3%). Chronic GVHD at 2 years occurred for 12% (4-21%) of the patients, with no extensive case. GRFS was 87% (77-96%) at 2-years (Figure 1, B). In our cohort, 57 patients received in vivo T cell depletion using either ATG (n=33, 60%) or anti-lymphocyte globulin (n=4, 7%) or alemtuzumab (n=20, 30%). Due to low rate of events happening during outcome, no risk factor analysis could be driven. Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort of 65 patients with idiopathic aplastic anemia, up-front UD transplantation leads to promising results, confirming previous studies on a smaller cohort of patients. Moreover, we did not find any difference according to in vivo T-cell depletion type, suggesting excellent results are not exclusively related to alemtuzumab-based regimen. Because of obvious limitation related to retrospective studies, unreported events and information bias cannot be excluded. Prospective trials are on their way in the United States and in Europe to formally confirm upfront UD transplantation as standard of care for pediatric patients with idiopathic aplastic anemia. Disclosures Rambaldi: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Research grant from Amgen Inc.; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Advisory board and speaker fees from Pfizer.; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support from Gilead.; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Received travel support., Research Funding; University of Milan: Current Employment; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Astellas: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Omeros: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Griškevičius:Novartis: Research Funding. Dalle:Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Orchard: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria; Bellicum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Risitano:Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amyndas: Consultancy; Samsung: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; RA pharma: Research Funding; Biocryst: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Achillion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Speakers Bureau. Peffault De Latour:Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Clonal Hematopoiesis Is Associated with Increased Risk for Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasms in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients Treated with Chemo(immuno)Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140232 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 19-20

Author(s):

Maria Teresa Voso ◽

Tatjana Pandzic ◽

Michail Iskas ◽

Marija Denčić-Fekete ◽

Eleonora De Bellis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

For Profit ◽

Myeloid Neoplasms ◽

Health Care Company ◽

Care Company

Clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) is defined by the detection of somatic mutations in genes recurrently mutated in myeloid neoplasms (MNs), in the blood of healthy individuals with normal blood values and lack of morphological evidence of MN. Recent studies have highlighted the potential association between CHIP and the development of MN, in particular therapy-related MN (t-MN) in patients with lymphoma treated with chemotherapy and/or autologous stem-cell transplantation. In the present study, we investigated whether the presence of CHIP is associated with a higher risk for the development of t-MN in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with chemo(immuno)therapy, including fludarabine and cyclophosphamide combinations. To this end, we studied 9 patients with CLL who developed a t-MN [acute myeloid leukemia (AML): n=6, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS): n=3] after the administration of chemo(immuno)therapy (FCR: n=7, other, n=2), with available samples collected both before CLL treatment and at diagnosis of t-MN. The median interval between the two samples was 26 months (range: 9-38months). NGS was performed on DNA extracted from bone marrow mononuclear cells (MNCs) at t-MN diagnosis, using the Trusight Myeloid Sequencing Panel (n=4) and the Archer VariantPlex Myeloid kit (n=5). Backtracking of the variants detected at the t-MN phase was performed by NGS of DNA extracted from peripheral blood MNCs (n=8) or CD19+ selected cells (n=1) in the samples from the CLL phase. In case no variants were detected in the t-MN phase, targeted digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) was also performed in paired CLL samples to confirm the presence of the variants. Moreover, using the Trusight Myeloid Sequencing Panel, we evaluated the prevalence of CHIP in a population cohort of 285 patients with CLL at the time of diagnosis. The variant allele frequency (VAF) cut-off for the detection of the variants was set to 5%. Variants were reported if meeting the following criteria: (i) located within an exonic or splicing region; (ii) be non-synonymous; (iii) not listed in the gnomAD database, if not also recurrently reported in Cosmic v85. Overall, 16 variants were detected in 7/9 cases analyzed at the time of t-MN [NRAS (n=4), DNMT3A (n=3), TET2 (n=2), EH2 (n=2), TP53 (n=2), KRAS (n=1), U2AF1 (n=1) and SF3B1 (n=1)], while no variants were detected in 2 t-MN samples. In 6/7 cases with detectable variants at t-MN diagnosis, the same variants were present at the CLL phase with either lower (n=4) or similar (n=2) VAF. Overall, CHIP was detectable in 6/9 (66.7%) CLL patients who later developed a t-MN. Among the untreated CLL patients, 45 CHIP-related variants were detected in 35/285 cases (12%) as 7 patients harbored more than one variant. The median VAF was 12.7% (5.1-58.6%) with 27/45 (60%) having a VAF<20%. The affected genes were: DNMT3A (n=9), ASXL1 (n=8), KRAS (n=7), BCOR (n=3), NRAS (n=3), TET2 (n=2), U2AF1 (n=2), PTPN11 (n=2), HRAS (n=2), JAK2 (n=1), CBL (n=1), CALR (n=1), IDH2 (n=1), MPL (n=1), PHF6 (n=1) and ETV6 (n=1). CHIP was not associated with advanced age. Subgroup-analysis amongst CHIP-patients revealed: (i) enrichment of additional CHIP-related variants, male gender and younger age in carriers of ASXL1 variants and (p=0.1, p=0.008 and p=0.06; (ii) a bias towards female gender in patients with DNMT3A variants (p=0.008). The difference in the prevalence of CHIP between patients with CLL developing a t-MN (6/7) and those in the untreated cohort (35/285) was statistically significant (p<0.001). In conclusion, CHIP is significantly enriched in patients with CLL developing t-MNs after the administration of chemo(immuno)therapy, with obvious therapeutic implications especially in the era of targeted agents. The significance of CHIP in CLL should be further evaluated in the context of large clinical studies. MTV and TP contributed equally. EF and PB contributed equally. Disclosures Voso: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Scarfo:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghia:ArQule: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive, Dynamo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MEI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Lilly: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stamatopoulos:AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Janssen, Gilead, Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Whimsical (Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia Study Involving CArt-wheeL): A Global Patient-Derived Data Registry Capturing Treatment, Quality of Life and COVID-19 Data

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-138945 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 30-31

Author(s):

Ibrahim Tohidi-Esfahani ◽

Andrew Warden ◽

Elena Malunis ◽

Peter Liburdi deNardis ◽

Javier Haurat ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

For Profit ◽

Derived Data ◽

Health Care Company ◽

Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia ◽

Care Company

Introduction: Patient-derived data can increase breadth of knowledge in rare cancers like Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (WM), including patient-reported outcomes (PROs). WhiMSICAL (Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia Study Involving CArt-wheeL) is the only global registry capturing patient-derived data for hypothesis generation in WM. Rapidly adaptable, it has been amended to capture Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) data. Methods: An ethically-approved WM-specific extension to www.cart-wheel.org, an online rare cancer database for patient-derived data, was developed by clinician and patient investigators. Participants complete consent, and enter symptom, pathology, treatment and PRO (EORTC-QLQ-C30, Impact of Event Scale-6) data online. Recruitment strategies utilizing social media tools are driven by the International Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia Foundation investigators. A validation study compared patient-entered data with data-manager-entered data in the Australia & New Zealand Lymphoma & Related Diseases Registry (LaRDR). To capture the impact of COVID-19, additional questions on COVID-19 testing, symptoms and therapy, as well as effect on WM management in those without COVID-19, were included in April 2020. Results: 453 patients from 19 countries have been recruited, predominantly from USA (46%) and Australia (25%), with male predominance (62%). At diagnosis, median age was 61 (range 24-83), median IgM 2620 mg/dL (IQR 1320-3850 mg/dL, n=175) and median hemoglobin 11.4 g/dL (IQR 9.5-12.9 g/dL, n=181). Of the 365 (81%) patients providing symptoms at diagnosis, fatigue/muscle weakness was most common (46%) and 30% were asymptomatic. Using the Impact of Event Scale for symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) resulting from a cancer diagnosis, the mean score among 387 patients was 5.9 (no stress=0, maximal stress=24), with 39/387 (10%) scoring >13 (PPV 94% for PTSD, Thoresen et al, 2010). This proportion did not increase for scores entered after March 1st, 2020 - 12/123 (10%) - when the COVID-19 pandemic became a global crisis. Marked treatment variation was noted, with 47 different first-line therapeutic combinations documented by 302 patients. Median time from diagnosis to first treatment for USA patients was 48 days (IQR 13-404, n=133) vs Rest of World (ROW) 176 days (IQR 20-885, n=163), (p=0.01). At median follow up of 38.5 months, first-line bendamustine rituximab had superior time to next treatment outcomes compared to other first-line therapies: rituximab monotherapy, dexamethasone-rituximab-cyclophosphamide and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi, Figure 1). 51 patients exposed to BTKi had a trend to higher EORTC QLQ-C30 global scales, mean 78.6±17.7, compared to 148 not exposed: mean 73.4±22.6 (p=0.13), despite higher treatment burden: median lines of treatment 2 (IQR 1-4) and 1 (IQR 1-2), respectively (p<0.0001). Paired analysis of global scales entered by patients prior to and after March 1 2020 demonstrated no impact of COVID-19 on quality of life: mean scores 74.4±18.8 and 76.0±17.1, respectively (n=69, p=0.45). Validation of patient-entered data with data-manager-entered data for 31 patients also in LaRDR demonstrated high concordance of >83%. 188/453 (42%) participants responded to the impact of COVID-19 questions; 75/188 (40%) had reduced face-to-face reviews, 4/188 (2%) had delays to starting treatment and 57/188 (30%) documented no impact. Of the 188 respondents, 23 (12%) had COVID-19 testing, with two returning a positive result and neither requiring hospitalization. Conclusion: WhiMSICAL is a robust, rapidly adaptable, global patient-derived data platform, providing insight into patient symptoms, real-world therapies and PROs. It is a scientific, ethically-approved portal for contributing the patients' voice in this rare lymphoma. Disclosures Warden: Janssen Cilag: Other: Personal fees for photoshoot event. Opat:CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZenca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Epizyme: Research Funding. D'Sa:Sanofi: Honoraria; BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kersten:Takeda: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Janssen/Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Olszewski:Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Harrington:Calithera Biosciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; BeiGene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Gilead: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Idera Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Trotman:Takeda: Research Funding; PCYC: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Updated Analysis of an Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of Blinatumomab As Second Salvage Therapy in Adults with Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141117 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 14-15

Author(s):

Luke Coyle ◽

Nicholas J. Morley ◽

Alessandro Rambaldi ◽

Kylie D. Mason ◽

Gregor Verhoef ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Metabolic Response ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

For Profit ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Health Care Company ◽

Care Company

Introduction: In an open-label phase 2 study, blinatumomab demonstrated efficacy with a manageable safety profile as second salvage in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (R/R B-NHL) following platinum-based salvage regimens (Coyle et al. Leukemia & Lymphoma. 2020: 1-10). Blinatumomab is a BiTE® (bispecific T-cell engager) immuno-oncology therapy that activates endogenous cytotoxic T cells to kill target B cells. Here, findings from the updated analysis are reported (NCT02910063). Methods: Patients aged >18 years with biopsy-confirmed B-NHL without prior complete response or complete metabolic response (CMR) following first-line treatment with anthracycline- based chemotherapy and anti-CD20 therapy, had progressive metabolic disease (PMD), no metabolic response (NMR), or partial metabolic response (PMR; Lugano Classification) after ≥2 cycles of platinum-based S1 therapy were eligible. Blinatumomab was given by continuous intravenous infusion for a single 70-day cycle 1 (9 µg/day for 7 days, 28 µg /day for 7 days, and 112 µg /day for 42 days, followed by a 14-day treatment free interval) and an optional 28-day second cycle (9 µg /day for 7 days, 28 µg /day for 7 days and 112 µg / day for 14 days) at the investigator's discretion. Primary endpoint was CMR by central PET. Additional endpoints included objective response rate (ORR; CMR plus PMR), overall survival (OS), progression- free survival (PFS), duration of response, post-response HSCT rate, and the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Results: As of the data cut date (June 3, 2020) for this updated analysis, 41 patients were enrolled between 23 January 2017 and 15 January 2018; 28 (68%) patients were refractory and 13 (32%) relapsed to first-line therapy, 66% had progressive disease following first salvage (S1), and 9 (22%) had double or triple hit status at baseline (Figure 1). ORR was 37% (15/41; 95% CI, 22-53) after 12 weeks of treatment, including 9 (22%) patients who achieved CMR and 6 (15%) achieved PMR. Of the 41 patients enrolled, 17 (42%) were double refractory; of which, 3 (7%) achieved CMR, and 3 (7%) achieved PMR. Of the 41 patients who received blinatumomab, median OS (95% CI) was 11.2 (5.9-NE) months with median follow-up time of 27.9 months. Among the 9 patients who achieved CMR, median OS (95% CI) was NE (7.0, NE) and median PFS (95% CI) was 8.4 (4.9-11.6) months with median follow of time of 4.7 months; of which, 3 patients had disease progression and 0 died. Of the 13 patients who achieved HSCT, median OS (95% CI) was NE (13.1-NE) with 69% of patients alive at 30 months and median PFS (95% CI) was 8.4 (5.3-13.9) months with 21% of patients alive at 12 months (Figure 2 and 3). In total, 29 (71%) patients had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs, including included infections (n=8; 20%), neutropenia (n=4; 10%), pulmonary embolism (n=1; 2%), and acute pancreatitis (n=1; 2%). Consistent with previous blinatumomab reports, neurologic events (NEs) were reported in 23 (56%) patients, including 10 (24%) with grade 3 NEs and 3 (7%) with NEs leading to treatment discontinuation. Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome was reported in only 1 patient. 7 (17%) patients discontinued treatment due to AEs and 7 (17%) had fatal AEs of which were related to disease progression. Conclusions: In conclusion, durable complete remissions can be achieved with a manageable safety profile using blinatumomab as second salvage in patients with aggressive R/R B-NHL following platinum based first salvage regimens Figure 1 Disclosures Coyle: Amgen: Other: Travel support. Morley:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Fees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Fees; Roche: Other: travel support; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Fees, travel support. Rambaldi:Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Omeros: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support from Gilead.; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Advisory board and speaker fees from Pfizer.; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Research grant from Amgen Inc.; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Astellas: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Received travel support., Research Funding; University of Milan: Current Employment. Furness:Amgen: Other: Travel Support. Desai:IQVIA: Current Employment. Mergen:Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. OffLabel Disclosure: Durable complete remissions can be achieved with a manageable safety profile using blinatumomab as second salvage in patients with aggressive R/R B-NHL following platinum based first salvage regimens

Download Full-text

Donor-Derived CAR T Cells Engineered with Sleeping Beauty Achieve Anti-Leukemic Activity without Severe Toxicity

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141236 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 34-34

Author(s):

Chiara F Magnani ◽

Giuseppe Gaipa ◽

Federico Lussana ◽

Daniela Belotti ◽

Giuseppe Gritti ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

For Profit ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T ◽

Health Care Company ◽

Care Company

Background Significant efforts over the past few years led Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy to success in relapsed and refractory (r/r) B-cell malignancies. Still logistical complexity, high costs and toxicities are currently the main barriers to the use of CAR T cell therapy. We therefore propose non-viral engineering of an allogeneic T cell population according to cytokine induced killer (CIK) cell protocol of differentiation. Methods We reported the updated results of our phase I/II trial in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using donor-derived CD19 CAR T cells generated with the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon and differentiated into CIK (CARCIK-CD19) according to the method enclosed in the filed patent EP20140192371. After lymphodepletion with Fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day) x 4 days and Cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2/day) x 2 days, CARCIK-CD19 were infused following a four-dose escalation scheme (1x106, 3x106, 7.5x106 and 15x106 transduced CAR+ T cells/kg) according to the Bayesian Optimal Interval Design (BOIN). During the cell manufacturing period, bridging anti leukemic therapy from patient registration to the beginning of the lymphodepletion, was allowed. The primary endpoint was to define the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and the safety assessment. Key secondary endpoints included the assessment of complete hematologic response (CR), defined as < 5% bone marrow (BM) blasts, circulating blasts < 1%, no clinical evidence of extramedullary disease, as well as the characterization of CARCIK-CD19 persistence in PB and BM (NCT03389035). Results The cellular product was produced successfully for all patients starting from the donor-derived peripheral blood (PB) and consisted mostly of CD3+ lymphocytes (mean 98.85% ±SD 1.19%) with a mean of 38.6% CAR expression (range 15.10%-73.17%). From January 2018 to July 2020, a total of 24 patients were screened, and 15 were enrolled (4 children and 11 adults) and infused with a single dose of CARCIK-CD19 (n=3 HLA identical sibling, n=4 MUD, n=8 haploidentical donor). The leukemic burden in the BM post lymphodepletion/pre-infusion ranged from 0% to 96%. Robust expansion was achieved in the majority of the patients. The maximal expansion reached about 1x106 transgene copies per μg DNA and 70% of CAR+ T cells in PB. CD8+ T cells represented the predominant circulating CAR+ T cell subset. Persistence of central memory CAR+ T cells was observed after infusion and CAR T cells were measurable up to 9 months. CARCIK-CD19 were characterized by a high profile of safety in all treated patients. Toxicities reported were two grade I and two grade II cytokine release syndrome (CRS) cases at the highest dose in the absence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), neurotoxicity, or dose-limiting toxicities. Seven out of 9 patients, receiving the highest doses, achieved CR and CRi at day 28. MRD-negative status for all responders was achieved by 6 out of 9 patients (1 currently in evaluation). The two patients in CR but with MRD+ relapsed with a CD19+ disease at +2.3 and +1.9 months post infusion, respectively. Among the 6 patients who achieved MRD-negative CR, two children underwent consolidation with a second allo-HSCT and are still alive and disease free (+17 and +13 months), two adult patients died of subsequent CD19+ disease relapse and two adult patients are still alive and disease free (+14 and +12 months) without additional therapies. The distribution profile of integration sites (IS) showed no preference for gene dense or promoter regions, and no particular differences between pre- and post- infusion sample IS. Samples harvested at early time points after infusion showed a highly polyclonal repertoire. At later time points (≥ 28 days after infusion) the repertoire of IS showed a marked reduction towards oligoclonality, in absence of specific dominant clones. Conclusions We can conclude that SB-engineered CAR T cells expand and persist in pediatric and adult B-ALL patients relapsed after HSCT. Sustained response was achieved without severe toxicities. All analyzed samples appear to have a highly polyclonal IS repertoire and no signs of genotoxicity by transposon insertions could be observed. Disclosures Gritti: IQVIA: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Autolus: Consultancy; Italfarmaco: Consultancy; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria; Jannsen: Other: Travel Support; Takeda: Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy. Rambaldi:Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Omeros: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Research grant from Amgen Inc.; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Advisory board and speaker fees from Pfizer.; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support from Gilead.; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Received travel support., Research Funding; University of Milan: Current Employment; BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Astellas: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company).

Download Full-text

Ocular Health of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): Baseline Data from the DREAMM-2 Trial of Belantamab Mafodotin (Belamaf)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139315 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 43-44

Author(s):

Rakesh Popat ◽

Aikaterini Kazantzi ◽

Asim Farooq ◽

Praneetha Thulasi ◽

Sagar Lonial ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Dry Eye ◽

Research Funding ◽

Slit Lamp ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Slit Lamp Examination ◽

For Profit ◽

Health Care Company ◽

Care Company

Introduction: The treatment paradigm for RRMM is characterized by continuous treatment to suppress the malignant plasma cell clone. Some treatments may affect the eye, leading to a broad spectrum of ocular disorders, from dry eye to glaucoma, causing impaired quality of life. Therefore, we examined the baseline eye health of patients with RRMM receiving single-agent belamaf in the DREAMM-2 study (NCT03525678) and compared the findings to those of age-matched individuals in the general population. A better understanding of baseline ocular status is important as patients may have existing, undiagnosed eye conditions that may affect future treatment options. Methods: DREAMM-2 investigated belamaf, a B-cell maturation antigen-targeted antibody-drug conjugate in patients with RRMM. Eligible patients had received ≥3 prior therapies and were refractory to an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor, and refractory and/or intolerant to an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. Prior to receiving belamaf, patients underwent systematic ocular history collection and eye examination and completed the eye-specific National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (NEI-VFQ-25). We report pretreatment eye-related findings to describe the baseline ocular status of patients with RRMM in DREAMM-2. Results: Of 221 patients enrolled, 100 (45%) were female and 121 (55%) were male, with a median age (range) of 66 years (34-89), median time from diagnosis of 5.4 years (1.1-12.1), and median 6 (3-21) prior lines of therapy; 98% patients had received bortezomib. Previous ocular history reported by patients were cataract (60%), intraocular surgery and/or laser treatment (35%), dry eye (20%), and glaucoma (6%), and history of ocular disease requiring medical treatment (12%). On examination, the mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) Snellen score was worse than 20/50 in one or both eyes in 20 and 4 of 218 patients with data, respectively. Blepharitis (anterior) was evident in approximately 20% and the corneal epithelium was abnormal (mainly mild-grade keratopathy) in 43% of patients. Impaired tear film production was reported with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in 33% of patients, and evidence of dry eye (Schirmer's test, median 8.2 mm [normal ≥15 mm] in the worse eye. Median worse-eye tear break up time was 8.6 sec [normal >10 sec]). Slit-lamp examination revealed a cataract in approximately 50% of patients. Ten (8%) patients had evidence of prior cataract surgery with an implanted lens (pseudophakia). Dilated fundoscopy identified an abnormal optic nerve in 10% of patients in either eye; of these, glaucomatous cupping was noted in 43% (right eye) to 50% (left eye) of patients. Median (range) overall composite vision score by NEI-VFQ-25 was 95.3 (28-100). Conclusions: There was a 60% prevalence of cataract in the study cohort and an increased prevalence of glaucoma (6% vs expected 3% in patients >65 years old; Kreft et.al. BMC Public Health 2019) in RRMM patients treated in the DREAMM-2 study. Both conditions can be associated with corticosteroids, often used in MM treatments, although cataract is also an age-related phenomenon. We noted a significant number of patients with blepharitis (anterior), dry eye, and MGD, which may be associated with prior bortezomib treatment. Forty-three percent of patients had an abnormal corneal epithelium at baseline, which may be related to dry eye. This is relevant as belamaf is associated with keratopathy (microcyst-like epithelial changes visible on slit-lamp examination, with or without symptoms). Overall NEI-VFQ-25 scores were comparable to those reported in patients >65 years old (Nickels et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017). Patients with RRMM may have a number of baseline ocular abnormalities suggesting a need for regular ophthalmic examinations in this vulnerable population to identify and manage underlying conditions and treatment-related complications. Specifically, attention should be paid to patients who may have ocular conditions associated with prior treatment with corticosteroids or bortezomib. The optimization of ocular heath in this population is particularly relevant given that emerging RRMM therapies such as belamaf are associated with significant ocular side effects. Funding: GSK (Study 205678); drug linker technology licensed from Seattle Genetics; monoclonal antibody produced using POTELLIGENT Technology licensed from BioWa. Disclosures Popat: GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Farooq:University of Chicago: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Thulasi:Emory University: Current Employment. Lonial:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Abbvie: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Sanofi: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JUNO Therapeutics: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria. Jakubowiak:AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive, Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Badros:Amgen: Consultancy; University of Maryland: Current Employment. Jeng:University of Maryland: Current Employment; EyeGate: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Kedrion, Merck, GSK: Consultancy. Opalinska:GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Baron:GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Piontek:GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Byrne:Adaptimmune, Novartis: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Womersley:GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gupta:GlaxoSmithKline: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Novartis: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Degli Esposti:Moorfields Eye Hospital: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

An Open Label, Phase 2 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Tenalisib (RP6530), a PI3K δ/γ and SIK3 Inhibitor, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136031 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 25-25

Author(s):

Sebastian Grosicki ◽

Genadi Iosava ◽

Mamia Zodelava ◽

Nikolay Tzvetkov ◽

Tadeusz Robak ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Open Label ◽

For Profit ◽

Stage 1 ◽

Health Care Company ◽

Anti Tumor Activity ◽

Care Company

Introduction: Despite high response rates to initial treatment, relapse is common in CLL. Although newer agents are approved for treatment recently, CLL remains an incurable disease. Tenalisib (RP6530) is a highly specific and orally available PI3K δ/γ+SIK3 inhibitor. In in-vitro studies, Tenalisib was highly effective (62nM) in demonstrating a cytotoxic effect in patient derived CLL cells and showed very good synergism in combination with fludarabine and ibrutinib at very low concentrations in patient derived primary CLL cells. Tenalisib has demonstrated good clinical activity in patients with T cell lymphomas. Previously, a pooled safety analysis of 93 patients treated with tenalisib monotherapy demonstrated a differentiated safety profile which is largely devoid of immune mediated toxicities (Iyer, ASH 2018). Methods: This trial is a Phase II, open label, multi-center, Simon's two stage study design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tenalisib in patients with CLL who have relapsed or are refractory after at least one prior therapy. In stage 1, 20 patients were to be enrolled and an additional 41 patients to be enrolled in stage 2 based efficacy results of stage 1 (>8 responders needed to proceed to stage 2). Patients with previously treated CLL with adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function, ECOG ≤2, and measurable disease are eligible. Patients with prior exposure to drug that specifically inhibits PI3K were excluded. The primary objective was to assess the anti-tumor activity. The secondary objectives were to assess safety and tolerability, and progression free survival (PFS). The responses were assessed using iwCLL criteria (Hallek 2018). Results: A total of 21 CLL patients predominantly male (86%) with median age was 66 years (range 44-79) were enrolled between Dec 2019 and March 2020 in Stage 1 of the study. 67% of patients had an ECOG score of 1, and 43% had Rai Stage III/IV disease with 67% having spleno/hepatomegaly. Patients had a median of 2 (range: 1-3) prior treatment regimens and 16 (76%) were refractory to last therapy. High risk patients included 15% del 17p, 10% del 11q, 5% ZAP and 5% TP53 mutations. In all 21 evaluable pts with a median follow-up of 4.9 months, 7 patients showed partial response (33%) while the remaining 14 patients showed stable disease (67%). 19 patients (90%) were still continuing therapy while 2 patients discontinued due to disease progression after showing a stable response. There was a median reduction in nodal disease to the extent of 54% in responding patients. The data readouts at C8D1 for all patients is currently awaited. The most common AEs which were mild-moderate in severity included transaminitis (19%), GGT elevation (5%) and neutropenia (5%). There was a related Grade 3 AE of neutropenia (5%). None of the related AEs led to study discontinuation. There were no events of diarrhoea/colitis or pneumonitis in patients who were on therapy for more than 6 months. Conclusions: Tenalisib showed promising single agent anti-tumor activity in patients with CLL with a favourable safety profile. Further data is awaited to estimate the response rates and the decision to move to Stage 2 of the study. Disclosures Robak: Momenta: Consultancy; BioGene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; UCB: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; UTX-TGR: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Octapharma: Honoraria; Medical University of Lodz: Current Employment; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding. Routhu:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A>.: Current Employment. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A: Current Employment. Nair:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Fludarabine and Melphalan Compared with Reduced Doses of Busulfan and Flurabine Improves Transplant Outcomes in Older MDS Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-121970 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 253-253

Author(s):

Betul Oran ◽

Kwang Woo Ahn ◽

Caitrin Fretham ◽

Mithun Vinod Shah ◽

Ryotaro Nakamura ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Total Dose ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Disease Free Survival ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only potentially curative therapy in eligible patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens that have been developed to extend HSCT to older patients resulted in encouraging outcomes. However, several retrospective studies have raised concerns about disease control when RIC is used in MDS and the ideal conditioning regimen has not yet been found. In this study, we aimed to compare two most commonly used RIC regimens; intravenous use of fludarabine with busulfan (FluBu) and fludarabine with melphalan (FluMel). Study population: Through the CIBMTR, after excluding patients with ex-vivo T cell depletion, we identified 1045 MDS patients aged ≥ 60 years and underwent first HSCT with matched related or matched (8/8) unrelated donor (MRD and MUD) using RIC between 2007-2016. RIC was defined via CIBMTR criteria as a regimen that incorporated an IV busulfan (BU) total dose ≤ 7.2 mg/kg or low-dose melphalan (MEL) total dose ≤ 150 mg/m2. By that, we identified 697 MDS patients who received FluBu (BU 6.4 mg/kg: 87%, BU 3.2 mg/kg: 13%) and 448 receiving FluMel (MEL 140 mg/m2: 80%, MEL 100 mg/m2: 20%). Results: The two groups, FluBu and FluMel, were comparable for disease and transplant related characteristics except the more frequent use of ATG or Campath in FluBu group (39% vs. 31%). The median age was 67 in both groups, and 26% and 19% of FluBu and FluMel groups were aged ³70, respectively. Hematopoietic comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was ³3 in 61% and 59% of FluBu and FluMel groups and MDS risk score by CIBMTR at HCT was high/very high in 34% in both groups. FluMel was associated with a reduced relapse incidence (RI) after HSCT compared with FluBu as presented in Table 1 and Table 2. Adjusted RI at 1-year was 43% with FluBu and 25% with FluMel (p=<0.0001). On the other hand, transplant related mortality (TRM) was higher with FluMel compared with FluBu (27% vs. 15%, p=<0.0001). The difference persisted at 2- and 3-years after HSCT as presented in the figure. Since the magnitude of improvement in RI was greater with FluMel than the improvement in TRM with FluBu, disease-free survival (DFS) was improved at 1-year and beyond with FluMel compared with FluBu (48% vs. 41% at 1-year, p=0.030, and 38% vs 28% at 3-years, p=0.0030). These outcome differences remained significant when sensitivity analyses were performed excluding patients who received RIC with either BU 3.2 mg/kg or Mel 100 mg/m2. FluMel, did not lead to higher incidence of severe grade 3-4 aGvHD (HR=1.2, 95%CI, 0.9-1.6, p=0.3) or chronic GvHD (HR=0.9, 95%CI=0.7-1.06, p=0.2). However, grade 2-4 aGVHD was observed more often with FluMel than FluBu (HR=1.3, 95%CI, 1.1-1.6, p=0.006). This led to inferior outcomes of GRFS within the first 2 months with FluMel (HR=1.9, HR=1.4-2.6, p<0.001) but superior outcomes of GRFS beyond 2 months with FluMel compared with FluBu (HR=0.7, 95%CI=0.6-0.8, p<0.001). Conclusion: Our results suggest that between the two most commonly used RIC regimens in older MDS patients, FluMel was associated with superior DFS and overall survival compared with FluBu due to reduced RI despite higher TRM. Disclosures Oran: AROG pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astex pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Nakamura:Kirin Kyowa: Other: support for an academic seminar in a university in Japan; Alexion: Other: support to a lecture at a Japan Society of Transfusion/Cellular Therapy meeting ; Celgene: Other: support for an academic seminar in a university in Japan; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scott:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Speakers Bureau. Popat:Jazz: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

The Prosid Study: Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) 10% in Primary Infection Prophylaxis in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia- Study Design

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136898 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 20-21

Author(s):

Oliver Cornely ◽

Anthony Mato ◽

Tadeusz Robak ◽

Sibylle Mellinghoff ◽

Tatiana Lavrova

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Primary Infection ◽

Research Funding ◽

Primary Prophylaxis ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Infection Prophylaxis ◽

Major Infection ◽

For Profit ◽

Health Care Company ◽

Care Company

Introduction: Secondary immunodeficiency (SID) occurs, among other reasons, as a consequence of hematological malignancies (HM), most commonly in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma. About 25% of patients present with secondary immune deficiency (SID) at diagnosis of CLL and this incidence may increase to 85% during the course of disease. This increase is also due to recent advances in CLL therapy leading to cumulative immunosuppression. Infections are the main cause of morbidity and mortality in CLL patients, causing between 30% and 50% of deaths within the first year after diagnosis. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is established as secondary prophylaxis to reduce infectious complications in patients with HM with hypogammaglobulinemia. To date, no large randomized study has established efficacy of IVIg as primary prophylaxis in CLL patients with hypogammaglobulinemia although several small studies suggest an up-to 4-fold reduction of infection rates. Methods: This study is planned as a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, interventional phase 3 study and will be conducted in approximately 50 centers in North America and Europe (EUDRA-CT #: 2019-004375-40). The primary objective is to demonstrate the benefit of IVIg 10% (Panzyga®) compared to placebo as primary infection prophylaxis in patients with CLL and SID who are undergoing antineoplastic therapy. A minimum of 240 adult patients with a diagnosis of CLL will be enrolled and allocated 1:1 to either IVIg 10% (0.4 g/kg) plus standard of care (SoC) prophylaxis or placebo plus SoC prophylaxis. Patients will receive up to 13 infusions of IVIg in 4-weekly intervals. Total duration for each patient will be up to 55 weeks consisting of up to 3 weeks for screening, 48 weeks of treatment and then 4 weeks of follow-up. Main inclusion criteria include: Patients with CLL diagnosis according to International Workshop on CLL (iwCLL) criteria undergoing CLL antineoplastic treatment, and hypogammaglobulinemia with IgG levels <500 mg/dL (5 g/L). Main exclusion criteria include: IgG treatment within the last 3 months, antibiotic prophylaxis and/or treatment within 7 days prior to current CLL treatment start, and current major infection or ˃1 major infection in the previous 6 months before baseline. The primary efficacy outcome will be the occurrence of at least one major infection defined as (•) bacterial or viral infection resulting in death, (•) microbiologically or clinically documented bacterial or viral infection requiring treatment with anti-infectives, or (•) fever of unknown origin requiring hospitalization or hospitalization prolongation. Rate of occurrence of at least one major infection will be compared between treatment groups (IVIg plus SoC or placebo plus SoC). Secondary outcomes include overall infection rate, frequency of SoC prophylaxis with anti-infectives, duration of anti-infective prophylaxis. Exploratory outcomes include: Quality of life measured by EQ-5D, IVIg PK profiles, and resource utilization. The primary efficacy evaluation is based on the comparison of major infections in CLL patients with or without primary infection prophylaxis with IVIg. The difference between these proportions will be statistically tested in the ITT population. The Z approximation will be used for statistical comparison of the proportions observed. One-sided 97.5% confidence interval will be provided. Conclusion: This prospective, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVIg 10% as primary prophylaxis of infections in CLL patients with SID in a large clinical setting for the first time. Figure 1 Disclosures Cornely: Scynexis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Melinta: Research Funding; Medicines Company: Research Funding; Roche Diagnostics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; PSI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Paratek: Consultancy, Honoraria; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Noxxon: Consultancy, Honoraria; Nabriva: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck/MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Mylan: Consultancy, Honoraria; Menarini: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; MedPace: Consultancy, Honoraria; Matinas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; F2G: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Entasis: Consultancy, Honoraria; DaVolterra: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Cidara: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Biosys: Consultancy, Honoraria; Basilea: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Amplyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodation, Expenses, Research Funding; Mycoses Study Group Education Research Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CoRe Consulting GmBH, Cologne, Germany: Current equity holder in private company; Shinogi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; German Federal Ministry of Research and Education and DFG: Research Funding; Actelion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Allecra: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodation, Expenses; Janssen: Research Funding. Mato:Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Loxo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Robak:Sandoz: Consultancy, Honoraria; UTX-TGR: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Honoraria, Research Funding; Morphosys: Research Funding; Medical University of Lodz: Current Employment; Takeda: Consultancy; Octapharma: Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Momenta: Consultancy; UCB: Honoraria, Research Funding; BioGene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mellinghoff:Octapharma: Consultancy; German Center for Infection Research, University of Cologne, German Society for Mycology: Research Funding. Lavrova:Octapharma Pharmazeutika Produktionsges.m.b.H.: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

Upfront Alternative Donor Transplant Versus Immunosuppressive Therapy in Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia Who Lack Fully HLA Matched Related Donor: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Retrospective Studies. on Behalf of the Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party of European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (SAAWP of EBMT)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-140846 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 6-7

Author(s):

Hind Alotaibi ◽

Mahmoud Aljurf ◽

Regis Peffault De Latour ◽

Shahid Iqbal ◽

Andrea Bacigalupo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Aplastic Anemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Older Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Retrospective Studies ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Severe Aplastic Anemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Meta Analyses

Introduction: WIdiopathic aplastic anemia is a rare and life threatening disorder characterized by immune mediated hematopoietic stem cells dysfunction. The standard treatment strategy of severe aplastic anemia (SAA) has been hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) for children and adults younger than the age of 40 if an HLA matched sibling donor (MSD) is available. Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) is the mainstay of treatment for older patients or when MSD is not available. The response rate to IST with the use of horse anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is around 70%. Despite that, many patients suffer from relapse or clonal evolution. The use of alternative donor transplant (ADT) from matched unrelated donor (MUD) or HLA haploidentical donor (HID) is not commonly used in frontline setting. We herein, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies to compare the outcome of IST versus ADT as upfront therapy for SAA. Methods: WWe conducted a comprehensive search in PUBMED/MEDLINE and EMBASE (1998-2019) for retrospective studies that compared the outcome of ADT with IST as upfront therapy in patients with SAA. The study was conducting in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. We included the studies with 10 patients or more in each arm. Studies that included patients with inherited aplastic anemia or PNH are excluded. The primary outcome is the 5-year overall survival. Two authors independently screened the studies, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of included studies and discrepancies were resolved by a third author. Study quality was evaluated by description of study characteristics, patients' characteristics, treatment details, and outcome. The odd ratio (OR) for 5-year survival was measured by Mantel-Haenszel test using random effect model. We also conducted another search and meta-analysis to compare upfront with salvage ADT. The meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager software version 5.3. Result: WWe screened a total of 697 articles (506 EMBASE, 191 PUBMED/MEDLINE). Five studies met our inclusion criteria included a total of 343 patients (176 in ADT group and 167 in IST group) for upfront ADT versus IST comparison and 6 studies with a total of 298 patients (198 in upfront ADT group and 100 in salvage ADT group) for upfront versus salvage ADT comparison. Included patients were of pediatric age group in 4 out of 5 studies. Xu ZL et al, included adult patients with median age 28 (18-49) years in upfront ADT arm and 32 (18-62) years in IST arm. Of those, only 10 patients in ADT group and 12 patients in IST group were above age of 40. In ADT versus IST comparison, the type of transplant was HID in three studies (total of 124 patients) and MUD/MMUD in two studies (total of 52 patients). The rabbit ATG was used in three studies, horse ATG in one study, and both types were used in one study (total of 68 patients received horse ATG and 99 patients received rabbit ATG). In term of disease severity, all included patients were SAA and very SAA (VSAA). Five studies were included in meta-analysis for 5-year overall survival. The pooled OR is statistically significant at 0.44 [95% CI 0.23-0.85] in favor of upfront ADT (Fig 1-A). The survival outcome was compared between upfront versus salvage ADT in 6 studies. The pooled OR is statistically significant at 0.31 [95% CI 0.15-0.64] in favor of upfront ADT (Fig 1-B). Conclusion: WThe pooled analysis of this study showed a potential survival advantage of upfront ADT over IST in patients with SAA who lack an HLA identical sibling donor. The use of ADT earlier in the disease course rather than as a salvage in young patients with severe disease, may improve survival. Data in older patients are limited, and at present, we cannot recommend ADT upfront in older patients. Given the limitations of our study including various types of IST, heterogeneity of patient population, health care systems, and retrospective nature of included studies; further studies are needed to confirm our findings. Disclosures Peffault De Latour: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Schrezenmeier:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hoechsmann:Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Risitano:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Samsung: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amyndas: Consultancy; RA pharma: Research Funding; Biocryst: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Achillion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. DiPersio:Magenta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Excellent Survival and Immune Reconstitution Following Matched/Mismatched Unrelated and Mismatched Related Transplantation in Adult Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: Updated Results from a Single Center Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-132113 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2043-2043

Author(s):

Amer Assal ◽

Diane George ◽

Monica Bhatia ◽

Divaya Bhutani ◽

Christian Gordillo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Unrelated Donor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Hematopoietic Stem ◽

Cell Counts ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽

Unrelated Donors ◽

Grade Ii

Introduction: The only cure for sickle cell disease (SCD) is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) although autologous HSCT of genetically engineered hematopoietic stem cells is promising. Lack of suitable matched related donors (MRD) is a major limitation driving interest in improving outcomes using unrelated donors. While excellent outcomes are achieved with non-myeloablative MRD HSCT in adults (Hsieh et al, 2009 and 2014), results from matched unrelated donor (MUD) HSCT have been limited by excessive graft versus host disease (GVHD) and treatment-related mortality (Shenoy et al, 2016). Here we present updated follow up of our institutional experience using MUD and mismatched unrelated donors (MMUD) in comparison to patients with MRD. Methods: Eligibility for HSCT included frequent pain crises requiring hospitalization and evidence of end-organ damage. Non-myeloablative conditioning with alemtuzumab and 3 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) was used for MRD HSCT (n=7), whereas patients without an MRD were transplanted using MUD, MMUD or haploidentical grafts (n=6) on a previously reported institutional protocol after conditioning with alemtuzumab (54 mg/m2), fludarabine (180 mg/m2), and melphalan (140 mg/m2), using a CD34+ selected graft with CD3+ cell add back. MRD recipients received sirolimus as GVHD prophylaxis. Non-MRD recipients initially received tacrolimus as GVHD prophylaxis (n=1) but subsequently received sirolimus (n=5) due to the first patient developing posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). All grafts were G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood grafts and all patients underwent RBC exchange to achieve Hgb S <30%. Data is reported using n (%) or median (range) and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables. Results: Median follow up is 21.7 months (range 4.7 - 63.4). Median age for MRD recipients was 28.7 (21.4 - 35.5) years and 22.8 (18.5 - 34.6) for non-MRD recipients. Of note, the MRD group included one patient with a renal allograft from the same donor and another with stage V renal disease awaiting a kidney transplant. All patients where homozygous for hemoglobin S except one who had hemoglobin Sβo -thalassemia in the MRD group, and another heterozygous for hemoglobin S and C in the non-MRD group. Patients in the MRD group received unmanipulated grafts with a median of 14 (6.2 - 16.9) x 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg. Non-MRD recipients received CD34 - selected grafts with a median of 7.8 (4.1 - 15.1) x 10E6 CD34+ cells/kg with 2.2 x 10E5 (0.1 - 2.5) CD3+ cells add back. No growth factors were used post-transplant. All patient engrafted with no cases of graft failure. Median time to engraftment was significantly longer for the MRD group at 25 (22 - 30) vs 19 (13 - 21) days, p=0.003. Two patients in the MRD group developed acute/late acute GVHD (2 grade II), and 3 patients in the non-MRD group (1 grade II, 2 grade III), 2 of which developed in while switching immune suppression due to PRES. All GVHD cases were steroid responsive and resolved. Three patients in the non-MRD group developed PRES and none in the MRD group. There were no cases of treatment related mortality and all patients are alive and free of SCD. As both groups received alemtuzumab, and the non-MRD group received a CD34-selected graft, we examined lymphocyte subset reconstitution at day 100 and 1 year post-HSCT. The most striking difference was in median CD8+ T cell counts at day +100 which were lower in the non-MRD group approaching significance [101 (43 - 2995) vs 6.5 (3 - 2233) cells/uL, p=0.055, for the MRD and non-MRD respectively]. CD8+ T-cell counts were not significantly different at 1 year [402 (184 - 1066) vs 774 (143 - 1002) cells/uL, p<0.99]. Results from other lymphocyte subsets including CD4+ T-cells, NK cells and B cells are shown in table 1 and were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Of note, early donor T-cell chimerism at D100 was not significantly different between MRD and non-MRD groups [27.0 (18.0 - 50.0) % vs 37.5 (3.0 - 80.0) %, p=0.83] whereas at 1-year, MRD group donor T cell chimerism was significantly lower [53.5 (17.0 - 65.0) % vs 82.7 (69 - 90), p=0.01]. Conclusion: We demonstrate excellent outcomes with 100% survival and no graft rejection following matched and mismatched unrelated donor HSCT for adult patients with severe SCD. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results and further delineate the impact of T-cell subset reconstitution on early-post transplant complications. Disclosures Assal: Incyte corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; boston biomedical: Consultancy. Bhatia:BMS: Consultancy; Vertex Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bhutani:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lentzsch:Abbvie: Consultancy; Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Honoraria; International Myeloma Foundation: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Columbia University: Patents & Royalties: 11-1F4mAb as anti-amyloid strategy; Caelum Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Proclara: Consultancy. Reshef:Magenta: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Atara: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding.

Download Full-text