scholarly journals Predictors of Maternal Morbidity Among Participants Enrolled in the Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium Registry

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Rita V Masese ◽  
Dominique Bulgin ◽  
Liliana Preiss ◽  
Mitchell Knisely ◽  
Eleanor Stevenson ◽  
...  

Introduction Pregnancy in sickle cell disease (SCD) is associated with an exacerbation of SCD-related complications and an increased risk of maternal complications. The increased risk is partly due to physiologic adaptations in pregnancy, which include increased metabolic demands and a hypercoagulable state. The maternal death rate for SCD is 629 per 100,000 deliveries, compared to 12 per 100,000 deliveries in black women and 6 per 100,000 deliveries in the general population (Raider et al., 2016). Studies on maternal and perinatal outcomes of patients with SCD present inconsistent and conflicting results. Some studies have reported an increase in maternal complications such as pre-eclampsia, acute chest syndrome and thromboembolic events, while other studies have reported no significant risk in adverse maternal outcomes. The inconsistent findings reported in prior studies may be attributed to small sample sizes and single-centered sites. Our study aims to determine the prevalence and predictors of maternal morbidity among participants enrolled in the SCD Implementation Consortium (SCDIC) registry, which is the largest, most geographically diverse SCD participant sample in the United States. Methods This cross-sectional study included women enrolled in the SCDIC registry who had at least one pregnancy event. The SCDIC is composed of eight academic SCD centers across the United States and one data-coordinating center. Participants were enrolled in the SCDIC registry if they were 18 to 45 years of age and had a confirmed diagnosis of SCD. Enrolled participants completed a series of surveys that collected sociodemographic information, SCD and pregnancy history and data abstractions of participants' medical records was completed. Medical complications queried during pregnancy included: vaso-occlusive episodes, acute chest syndrome, blood transfusion requirement, preeclampsia, maternal diabetes and deep venous thrombosis. Descriptive analysis of sociodemographic, clinical and maternal characteristics was conducted. Bivariate analysis was performed using Chi-Square test, Mann-Whitney U test, t-test, and logistic regressions, as appropriate. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analysis. Results The study sample included 743 women who had at least one pregnancy event, and a total of 1066 live births. Almost all women (96.3%) were African American, with a median age of 21 years (inter-quartile range of 19 to 23 years) at first birth. The majority had Hb SS SCD genotype (69.5%; 513 of the 738 with SCD genotype data). Of all reported pregnancies, participants did not use hydroxyurea during conception (78%), and pregnancy (84.5%). Only 2.7 % of the women reported using fertility drugs or assisted reproductive procedures. Seventy five percent of the pregnancies that ended in live births had maternal complications. The leading complications were vaso-occlusive episodes (61.2%), pregnancy requiring blood transfusion(s) (33.2%), preeclampsia (15.4%), deep venous thrombosis (5.6%) and acute chest syndrome (7.7%). When the pregnancies were stratified by SCD genotype, women with Hb SS had a higher occurrence of acute chest syndrome (63.4% vs. 26.7%), transfusion requirement (70.8% vs. 21%) and preeclampsia (66.7% vs 22.4%). In the univariate logistic regressions, multiparous women, with a history of adverse maternal outcomes in a previous pregnancy, had higher odds of vaso-occlusive episodes (OR: 3.42; 95% CI: 2.42-4.94) acute chest syndrome (OR:4.99; 95% CI:2.56- 9.48), transfusion requirement (OR:3.86; 95% CI:2.64- 5.69), and pre-eclampsia (OR:3.36; 95% CI:2.05-5.45). Conclusion In this large multicenter registry, we found pregnant women with SCD have significant maternal complications. Early antenatal care by healthcare providers knowledgeable about risk factors for adverse maternal outcomes in SCD is essential improve maternal and fetal outcomes and reduce the maternal death rate for SCD. Disclosures Hankins: Novartis: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; MJH Life Sciences: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; UptoDate: Consultancy; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Honoraria, Research Funding; LINKS Incorporate Foundation: Research Funding; American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology: Honoraria. Treadwell:Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy; UpToDate: Honoraria. King:Amphivena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bioline: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Cell Works: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novimmune: Research Funding; RiverVest: Consultancy; Tioma Therapuetics: Consultancy; WUGEN: Current equity holder in private company. Gordeuk:CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Imara: Research Funding; Ironwood: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Kanter:SCDAA Medical and Research Advisory Board: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AGIOS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BEAM: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; GLG: Honoraria; Jeffries: Honoraria; Cowen: Honoraria; Wells Fargo: Honoraria; NHLBI Sickle Cell Advisory Board: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medscape: Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Honoraria; bluebird bio, inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy. Glassberg:Pfizer: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding. Shah:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2409-2409
Author(s):  
Tiffany Lin Lucas ◽  
Shveta Gupta ◽  
Joanna A. Davis ◽  
Fernando F. Corrales-Medina

Introduction: With the Federal Drug and Administration approval of the use of emicizumab from birth to adulthood, clinicians will now grapple with when to choose and offer emicizumab for routine prophylaxis, especially in previously untreated patients (PUPs). Given the overall limited real-world reported data and experience using emicizumab in PUPs, we created and administered a survey to medical providers in the United States who care for paediatric patients with haemophilia to investigate real-world practice strategies and treatment selection for PUPs. Methods: After review and endorsement by the Haemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society (HTRS), the survey was electronically distributed by e-mail to all providers included in the HTRS core member list. The survey was also sent to those providers included in a list of Haemophilia Treatment Centre (HTC) physicians (with duplicate emails reconciled). Providers needed to self-identify as ones that treat pediatric patients to be included. The survey was developed as a tiered survey with questions presented to each recipient based on their prior responses. Results: Seventy-seven completed surveys were included and analysed. All participants were active providers at a comprehensive HTC and the majority (93.4%) were practicing at an academically affiliated site. In terms of characteristics of those that answered the survey, forty-eight percent of responders reported that 1-20% of their patients had expressed interest in emicizumab. 46% of participants (34/74) reported that they would personally consider emicizumab as their prophylaxis recommendation for the majority (>50%) of their hemophilia A patients without inhibitors. 57% (44/76) reported that 1-10% of their non-inhibitor hemophilia A patients were already prescribed emicizumab prophylaxis. Each participant was then asked about his or her consideration of emicizumab as prophylaxis therapy for a 2 month old PUP. Just over the majority were unsure or said no to this consideration (51.3%) and their concerns were lack of information on safety and efficacy in this young age group and increased risk for inhibitor development. If the 2 month old PUP had a high risk of inhibitor, the majority of providers who initially were hesitant to start emicizumab prophylaxis would remain so. Of note, those providers went on to be asked if the patient had gone on to complete 50 exposure days without inhibitor development, they would then become more likely to initiate emicizumab prophylaxis therapy. Use of concurrent factor replacement was posed to all participants and there were varied responses. Discussion: Overall, our results reflect a widespread practice variation and a not yet well-standardized or defined approach for the use of emicizumab in PUPs with haemophilia A. In this survey, patient preference and individual bleeding risk were the top reasons for which a provider would consider using switching to emicizumab prophylaxis in both severe and mild/moderate haemophilia A patients. This pattern of practice reflects the current era of individualized medicine. Overall, our findings reinforce the need for more studies to investigate the outcomes of a combined treatment approach with FVIII concentrates and emicizumab focusing in the potential benefit of this approach in decreasing the risk for inhibitor development PUPs. Clinicians also feel the need for further data to help clarifying the safety of emicizumab in this population. Figure Disclosures Gupta: Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda-Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Davis:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Shire: Consultancy; Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy. Corrales-Medina:Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 991-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Kanter ◽  
Darla K Liles ◽  
Kim Smith-Whitley ◽  
Clark Brown ◽  
Abdullah Kutlar ◽  
...  

Background: Crizanlizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds P-selectin and blocks interaction with its ligands (including leukocyte PSGL-1), is under investigation for preventing vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). Crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg was shown to significantly reduce the median annual rate of VOCs by 45.3% versus placebo (Hodges-Lehmann median absolute difference of -1.01 vs placebo, 95% CI [-2.00, 0.00]; P=0.01) (Ataga et al. N Engl J Med 2017). Aims: This pooled analysis evaluated key safety endpoints in patients treated with the recommended dose of crizanlizumab (5.0 mg/kg monthly, following 2 loading doses in the first month). Methods: Data were pooled from 2 Phase II studies of SCD patients (any genotype) with a history of VOCs leading to a healthcare visit. SUSTAIN (NCT01895361) was a randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients aged 16-65 years who had experienced 2-10 VOCs in the previous 12 months. SOLACE-adults (A2202) is an ongoing, open-label PK/PD study (NCT03264989) in patients aged 16-70 years who had experienced at least 1 VOC in the previous 12 months; data cut-off for this analysis was 1 March 2019. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated based on MedDRA v21.1. AE severity in SOLACE was assessed based on CTCAE v5; in SUSTAIN, severity was collected as mild/moderate/severe but then recategorized for this analysis to a 5-point scale similar to CTCAE grading. AEs of special interest (ie known class effects; AEs identified preclinically or in previous studies; or potentially relevant based on the mechanism of action of crizanlizumab) were also evaluated and included infections, infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and hemostatic effects. As monoclonal antibodies can induce an immune response, anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were also measured. Results: In total, 111 patients (SUSTAIN, n=66; SOLACE, n=45) received crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg: 59 females (53.2%) and 52 males (46.8%). Median age was 29 years (range 16-65). The most common SCD genotypes were HbSS (n=73; 65.8%) and HbSC (n=19; 17.1%), and 75 patients (67.6%) were receiving hydroxyurea (HU). Most patients (n=67; 60.4%) had 1-4 VOCs in the previous 12 months. Median duration of exposure to crizanlizumab was 46 weeks (range 4-58). At least 1 AE was reported in 94 patients (84.7%), the most common (≥15%) being headache (n=22; 19.8%), nausea (n=18; 16.2%) and back pain (n=17; 15.3%). AEs were mild/moderate (grade 1 or 2) and resolved spontaneously in most patients; 23 patients (20.7%) had a grade 3 AE and 1 (0.9%) had a grade 4 AE (neoplasm). At least 1 serious AE was reported in 24 patients (21.6%); serious AEs with a suspected relationship to crizanlizumab were reported in 6 patients (5.4%). Twenty-eight patients (25.2%) discontinued treatment prematurely (n=23 in SUSTAIN, n=5 to date in SOLACE): discontinuations due to AEs (bradycardia and breast cancer) occurred in 2 patients (1.8%); neither was considered related to crizanlizumab. There were 2 on-treatment deaths in SUSTAIN, but neither were considered related to crizanlizumab. Infection events were reported in 51 patients (45.9%), the most common (≥5%) being upper respiratory tract infection (n=13, 11.7%) and urinary tract infection (n=11, 9.9%). There were no grade 4 infections and none led to discontinuation. Data suggest no increased risk or severity of infection in studies with crizanlizumab. Two patients (1.8%) experienced IRRs; the events were not serious and did not lead to discontinuation. Bleeding events were rare, with most observed hemostatic AEs being abnormal laboratory parameters occurring only once. Treatment-induced ADAs were transiently detected in 1 patient (0.9%) and spontaneously resolved. There were no clinically relevant laboratory (hematology, biochemistry, liver) or ECG abnormalities, or vital sign changes, and no notable differences in the AE incidence rates by gender, ethnicity or HU use. Conclusions: This pooled analysis shows that crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg was well tolerated, with a favorable safety profile, in patients with SCD and a history of VOCs. Most AEs were mild/moderate, and discontinuations due to AEs were infrequent. The immunogenic potential of crizanlizumab appears low and there is currently no evidence for an increased risk of infection or bleeding. SOLACE-adults and SOLACE-kids (6 months to <18 years) are ongoing, and the randomized Phase III STAND trial is recruiting. Disclosures Kanter: bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy; SCDAA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NHLBI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rockpointe: Honoraria; Peerview: Honoraria; Jeffries: Consultancy; Medscape: Honoraria; GLG: Consultancy; Cowen: Consultancy; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Sangamo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Modus: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Imara: Consultancy. Liles:Novartis: Other: PI on clinical trial Sickle cell ; Shire: Other: PI on clinical trial Sickle cell ; Imara: Other: PI on Clinical trial- Sickle cell . Brown:Novartis, Inc: Research Funding. Kutlar:Bluebird Bio: Other: DSMB Member; Micelle Biopharma: Other: DSMB Chair; Novartis: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. (GBT): Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding. Elliott:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Other: Shareholder. Lincy:NOVARTIS PHARMA AG: Employment. Poggio:Novartis: Employment. Ataga:Advisory Board: Global Blood Therapeutics, Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: VINDICO WILL FORWARD DISCLOSURES ONCE RECEIVED AND SIGNED NOT RECEIVED TO DATE; VINDICO WILL FORWARD DISCLOSURES ONCE RECEIVED AND SIGNED NOT RECEIVED TO DATE: Other: VINDICO WILL FORWARD DISCLOSURES ONCE RECEIVED AND SIGNED NOT RECEIVED TO DATE; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emmaus Life Sciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2048-2048
Author(s):  
Ondine Walter ◽  
Pierre Cougoul ◽  
Julien Maquet ◽  
Pablo Bartolucci ◽  
Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction : Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited disorder which affects 300,000 newborns per year. Vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs) cause an important morbi-mortality and a decreased quality of life in patients with SCD. Some risk factors of VOE are well known, like infection, cold exposure, stress, pulmonary diseases and dehydration. Exposure to systemic corticosteroids has been suspected to increase the occurrence of VOEs in few case reports or series. However, no comparative study has been conducted to demonstrate this risk which is still debated, resulting in discrepancies among guidelines on SCD management. This study aimed to assess the risk of hospitalization for VOE associated with out-hospital exposure to systemic corticosteroids in patients with SCD in France. Methods : Data source was the French national health insurance system database, named SNDS (Système National des Données de Santé) between 2010 and 2018. The SNDS links sociodemographic, out- and in-hospital data for the entire French population (>66 million inhabitants). The study population consisted in all patients with SCD with at least one hospitalization for VOE during the study period, identified with a primary discharge diagnosis of VOE (D57.0 code of the international classification of disease, 10 th version; positive predictive value: 98.6%). All genotypes (homozygous SS-SCD and double-heterozygous SCD) were included. Because we assessed out-hospital exposure to corticosteroids, patients hospitalized during the three months before the first VOE were excluded. We performed a case-case-time-control study (Figure 1). This self-controlled design results in self-adjustment for time-independent confounders, including genotype. The outcome was the first hospitalization for VOE. The exposure to oral and injectable corticosteroids, identified using out-hospital reimbursement data, was assessed during a case period (28 days before the outcome) compared to the exposure during a control period (28 days, starting 84 days before the outcome). The same comparison was made among future cases (matched patients hospitalized for VOE the year after the given case), in order to adjust for the trend of exposure to corticosteroids (calendar variations of corticosteroid exposure). Results : Overall, 5,151 cases of VOEs were included in the main analysis. Median age at first VOE was 16.9 years; 317 (6.2%) patients were exposed to corticosteroids during the case period. In the main analysis, corticosteroid exposure was significantly associated with the occurrence of hospitalizations for VOEs: adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR): 3.81, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.44 to 5.61. In patients exposed to hydroxyurea, the aOR was 2.61, 95% CI: 1.07 to 6.39, compared with an aOR of 4.00, 95% CI: 2.53 to 6.30 in unexposed patients. In the subgroup analysis by age, the aOR was 2.81, 95% CI: 1.49 to 5.30 in children, and 4.45, 95% CI: 2.37 to 8.37 in adults. The results were consistent in all sensitivity analyses. Conclusion : This study showed an association between outpatient exposure to systemic corticosteroids with an increased risk of hospitalization for VOE, in both adults and children. Hydroxyurea may reduce this risk in adults. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bartolucci: GBT: Consultancy; Emmaus: Consultancy; Fabre Foundation: Research Funding; AGIOS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Lecture fees, Steering committee, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Other: Lecture fees; INNOVHEM: Other: Co-founder; Bluebird: Consultancy, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy; Hemanext: Consultancy; Addmedica: Consultancy, Other: Lecture fees, Research Funding. Moulis: Argenx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2102-2102
Author(s):  
Payal C Desai ◽  
Julia Brittain ◽  
Susan Jones ◽  
Adam McDonald ◽  
Douglas R Wilson ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2102 Background: Despite the abundant laboratory evidence of platelet activation and inflammation in sickle cell disease (SCD), the contribution of these changes to the pathogenesis of SCD remains uncertain. Patients with SCD exhibit increased platelet activation in the non-crisis, “steady state,” and further increases with acute pain episodes. In addition, levels of the inflammatory mediator, CD40 ligand (CD40L) are increased in the plasma and significantly reduced in the platelets of SCD patients compared to healthy individuals. CD40L may contribute to the pathogenesis of acute pain episodes. Despite an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of SCD, the treatment of acute pain episodes is supportive. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eptifibatide, a synthetic peptide inhibitor of the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor, in patients with SCD during acute painful episodes. Methods: In this single site placebo-controlled trial, eligible patients admitted for acute painful episodes received eptifibatide (two 180 mg/kg boluses 10 minutes apart, followed by a continuous infusion at 2 mg/kg/min for 6 hours) or placebo at a ratio of 2:1. The Post-Treatment Phase lasted for up to 7 days or until resolution of the crisis, whichever was shorter, but no less than 24 hours after discontinuation of infusion. The Follow-up Phase included safety evaluations obtained 14 to 17 days and 28 to 35 days after discontinuation of infusion. The primary outcomes were major bleeding episodes and the largest observed decrease in platelet count during the study. We also evaluated the effect of eptifibatide on the duration of acute pain episodes, pain intensity, duration of hospitalization, total opioid use and acute chest syndrome. Results: Thirteen patients (SS - 10, Sb0 - 2, SC - 1) were randomized to receive either eptifibatide (N=9; 6 females; median age - 25 years) or placebo (N=4; 3 females; median age - 31 years). One patient in the eptifibatide arm withdrew consent following completion of study drug infusion and 1 patient in the placebo arm was withdrawn early because she did not meet eligibility criteria. In the intent-to-treat analysis, there were no major bleeding episodes in either group (point estimate of difference in eptifibatide vs. placebo proportion: 0.0, 95% CI; −0.60, 0.37).There was one minor bleeding episode in a patient on the eptifibatide arm (point estimate of difference in eptifibatide vs. placebo proportion: 0.11, 95% CI: −0.502, 0.494). There was a trend for the largest decrease in platelet count to be greater in the eptifibatide arm compared to the placebo arm, although the difference was not statistically significant (Hodges-Lehman estimate of location shift for eptifibatide vs. placebo: −82, 95% CI; −281, 54). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with thrombocytopenia between the treatment groups (point estimate of difference in eptifibatide vs. placebo proportion: 0.11, 95% CI: −0.587, 0.495). The median time to discharge and the median time to crisis resolution were 3.0 days for both treatment arms. The median total opioid use was 400.2 morphine equivalents (ME) for the eptifibatide group and 1471 ME for the placebo group (Hodges-Lehman estimate of location shift for eptifibatide vs. placebo: −65.8, 95% CI: −2519, 1700). There was one episode of acute chest syndrome in each treatment arm. Conclusions: In this small study of SCD patients hospitalized with acute painful episodes, eptifibatide appeared to be safe, but did not improve the times to crisis resolution or hospital discharge. Eptifibatide was associated with a reduced requirement for opioid analgesics, although the difference was not statistically significant. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00834899. Disclosures: Parise: BD: Consultancy; Biogen-Idec: Consultancy; NIH: Research Funding; AHA: Research Funding; SCDAC-NIH: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BRI Milwaukee: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ataga:Pfizer: Consultancy; HemaQuest Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adventrx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Eptifibatide, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, was evaluated as treatment for acute pain episodes in patients with sickle cell disease.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3459-3459
Author(s):  
Rishi J Desai ◽  
Mufaddal Mahesri ◽  
Raisa Levin ◽  
Denise Globe ◽  
Krista McKerracher ◽  
...  

Introduction: There is limited contemporary evidence on clinical outcomes and healthcare use in sickle-cell disease (SCD) patients enrolled in US Medicaid. We aimed to provide contemporary estimates for rates of vaso-occlusive crises (VOC), mortality, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in SCD patients enrolled in US Medicaid. Methods: We conducted a cohort study using nationwide Medicaid insurance claims data (2000-2013). Patients were included based on ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient HbSS SCD diagnosis claims after 365 days continuous enrollment in Medicaid (or continuous eligibility since birth if age at diagnosis is <1 year). Patients were followed until Medicaid disenrollment, death, bone marrow transplant, or end of data availability (December 31, 2013). Outcomes included frequency of VOCs, event rates of HRU including emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and blood transfusions, and all-cause mortality during the follow-up period. All outcomes were reported as annualized event rates (with 95% confidence intervals). VOCs were stratified by age-group (<1, 2-6, 7-12, 13-18, 19-35, 35+ years), VOCs at baseline (<2, 2-4, >=5), race (African American or not), and sex. The impact of VOCs on the risk of mortality was analyzed using an extended multivariable Cox model with VOCs modeled as time-varying and updated annually. Results: A total of 44,033 SCD patients were included in the analysis; 47% were female, 82% were African American, and a mean (SD) age of 15.7 (13.6). The average VOC rate was 3.71 (95% CI: 3.70-3.72) VOCs per person-year over an average follow-up period of 4.3 years. The rate of VOCs was substantially higher among patients aged 19-35 years and those with a higher VOC frequency at baseline (Table 1). Overall, the event rates (95%CI) per person year for other HRU outcomes were: 2.97 (2.97-2.98) ED visits, 2.39 (2.38-2.40) hospitalizations, 5.80 (5.79-5.81) outpatient visits, and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.90-0.91) blood transfusions. The mortality rate was 1.13 (95%CI: 1.08-1.17) events per 100 person-years overall, with the highest rate being 4.91 (95%CI: 4.58-5.25) events per 100 person-years among patients ≥ 35 years of age. Higher VOC burden in the preceding year was associated with an increased risk mortality: 2-4 VOC vs. 0 or 1 VOC: Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.36 (95%CI: 1.21-1.52); ≥ 5 VOC: HR= 1.56 (95%CI: 1.39-1.75). Conclusion: The burden of SCD in US Medicaid enrollees is substantial, especially during early adulthood, with markedly high rates of VOCs, mortality, and healthcare utilization. A higher VOC rate in the preceding year was associated with an increased risk of mortality suggesting a need for careful management of SCD patients with higher VOC burden. Table 1. Annualized rates of vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) among sickle cell disease patients enrolled in Medicaid. VOC, vaso-occlusive crises; CI, confidence interval. Table 1 Disclosures Desai: Merck: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Globe:Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated: Employment. McKerracher:CRISPR Therapeutics: Employment. Mutebi:Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated: Employment. Bohn:Bohn Epidemiology: Equity Ownership; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc: Consultancy. Achebe:Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacosmos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fulcrum Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schneeweiss:Genentech: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Aetion, Inc.: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Whiscon LLC: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4697-4697
Author(s):  
Shannon Phillips ◽  
Martina Mueller ◽  
Alyssa M Schlenz ◽  
Cathy Melvin ◽  
Robert J. Adams ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Stroke is one of the most devastating complications of sickle cell anemia (SCA). The STOP (Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Anemia) protocol has been adopted by National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) as the guideline for stroke screening using transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and prevention with chronic red cell transfusion therapy (CRCT). Evidence from the STOP I/II studies indicates the protocol is highly effective, yet wide scale implementation has not been achieved. The DISPLACE (Dissemination and Implementation Looking at the Care Environment) project is a multicenter, NHLBI funded consortium of 28 sites across the United States whose purpose is to identify barriers to the implementation of the STOP protocol and test novel methods for overcoming barriers. The purpose of this study was to use data on practice patterns to evaluate current measurement and practice standards at DISPLACE consortia sites. This abstract presents reported TCD screening and CRCT practices. Methods: A practice patterns survey was sent to the principal investigator (PI) for each DISPLACE site via RedCap ©. PIs were hematology/oncology specialty care providers for children with SCA. Sites represent urban and rural regions, large and small academic institutions, and community-based institutions. The survey was developed by the study investigators; questions were predominantly in a multiple-choice format. Items pertaining to TCD screening included: screening technique (including type of TCD); screening frequency; follow-up for abnormal, conditional, and inadequate results; standard value ranges. Results: All 28 PIs completed the survey. About half of the respondents were female (53.5%). Most identified as White (77.8%), followed by Asian (11.1%) and Black or African American (7.4%). Two identified as Hispanic or Latino (7.4%). Slightly more sites reported using standard TCD (57.1%) versus imaging TCD (TCDi) (42.9%). To calculate the time-averaged mean of the maximum (TAMM) velocities and characterize TCD results, nearly all sites use the middle cerebral artery (96.4%); a majority also use the anterior cerebral artery and/or the terminal internal cerebral artery or distal internal cerebral artery (71.4%). Fewer sites use the posterior cerebral artery (35.7%) or the basilar artery (14.3%). In 7.1% of sites, the radiologist determines which vessels to use during the exam. TCD screening is ordered for children with SCA annually in 92.9% of sites and every 6 months in 7.1% of sites. When TCD screening indicates abnormal TAMM velocities, 85.7% of sites initiate CRCT, 7.1% initiate hydroxyurea (HU) therapy, and 3.6% initiate both HU and CRCT. For additional evaluation, an MRI/MRA is obtained at 64.3% of sites. For high conditional results, the most common action is to initiate HU (67.9%). Other responses include obtaining an MRI/MRA (46.4%) and/or repeating the TCD in 2-4 weeks (25.0%), 6-8 weeks (35.7%), or 12-16 weeks (7.1%). Results deemed inadequate led to repeating the TCD in 2-12 weeks (57.1%) or in one year (3.6%), obtaining an MRI/MRA (57.1%), beginning HU therapy (7.1%), or no repeat TCD or change in management (3.6%). Actions for low conditional results include repeating the TCD (71.4%), obtaining an MRI/MRA (32.3%), and/or initiating HU therapy (57.1%). Surprisingly, sites use different TAMM ranges to characterize the normal/abnormal findings (Table 1). Conclusions: Nearly all DISPLACE sites order TCD screening annually, as recommended in the guidelines, with some ordering screening more frequently. A few sites did not report initiation of CRCT per STOP protocol for abnormal TCD results; however, over half of the sites reported following up with an MRI/MRA, which may suggest evaluating for vasculopathy prior to CRCT. Some sites reported beginning HU therapy for abnormal results; this may reflect consideration of patients for whom CRCT is not possible, but data were not collected for confirmation. Interestingly, results suggest a reliance on MRI/MRA since sites commonly reported ordering neuroradiology studies for abnormal, conditional, and inadequate TCD results. This may suggest an unclear pathway for children with borderline TCD results, and an area for future study. While reported value ranges closely approximated those in the STOP protocol, results indicate sites conducting screening with TCDi may use more conservative values than the validated protocol. Disclosures Phillips: NHLBI: Research Funding. Mueller:NHLBI: Research Funding. Schlenz:NHLBI: Research Funding. Melvin:NHLBI: Research Funding. Adams:NHLBI: Research Funding. Kanter:AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; bluebird bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sancilio: Research Funding; NHLBI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Apopharma: Research Funding; ASH: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3653-3653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baba Inusa ◽  
Raffaella Colombatti ◽  
David C Rees ◽  
Matthew M Heeney ◽  
Carolyn C Hoppe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Sickle cell anemia (SCA) is characterized by significant phenotypic variability. DOVE1 was a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multinational study that investigated the efficacy and safety of prasugrel, a P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist, for reduction of vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), a composite of painful crisis or acute chest syndrome, in 2- to <18-year-olds with SCA (age cohorts: 2 to <6 years, 6 to <12 years, and 12 to <18 years) (NCT01794000). Methods: DOVE was conducted at 51 sites in 13 countries across 4 continents. A total of 341 subjects were randomized (prasugrel, n=171; placebo, n=170) and SCA genotypes (homozygous hemoglobin S; hemoglobin Sβ0 thalassemia) were included. Eligibility required ≥2 VOCs in the prior year. Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics and study endpoints were compared by region. Since no overall treatment effect was found, data provided reflect the combined 341 subjects (Americas, N=57; sub-Saharan Africa [SSA], N=148; North Africa/Middle East, N=110; Europe, N=26). Results: Per regional enrollment, the largest proportion of subjects were 6 to <12 years in SSA (48.6% [n=72]), 12 to <18 years in the Americas (45.6% [n=26]) and North Africa/Middle East (58.2% [n=64]), but more evenly divided among the 3 age groups in Europe (30.8-34.6% [n=8-9]). Self-reported racial groupings differed by region (p<0.001): 100% white in North Africa/Middle East; 100% black in SSA; 19.2% white, 76.9% black, and 3.8% multiple in Europe; and 1.8% white, 96.4% black, and 1.8% multiple in the Americas. Mean body mass index was <17 in SSA and Europe (15.3 and 16.6 kg/m2) but >18 in North Africa/Middle East and the Americas (18.3 and 18.1 kg/m2) (p<0.001). Mean blood pressures were lowest in SSA (systolic: 99.0 vs. 105.4-108.0 mmHg, p=0.004; diastolic: 58.3 vs. 60.4-62.9 mmHg, p=0.003). The proportion of subjects with history of acute chest syndrome prior to enrollment was lower in SSA (6.1%) than other regions (18.2-66.7%, p<0.001). Mean number of VOCs in the year prior to enrollment was higher in the Americas than other regions (5.8 vs. 3.2-3.4, p=0.041). Hydroxyurea (HU) use at baseline varied by region: 91.2% in the Americas, 72.7% in North Africa/Middle East, 42.3% in Europe, and 6.8% in SSA (p<0.001). For subjects not on HU at baseline (Table 1), mean hemoglobin at baseline was lowest in SSA (7.6 g/dL); reticulocyte count was lowest in the Americas (214.8 billion/L) and highest in Europe (327.8 billion/L) (p=0.004). For all geographic regions, the most frequent serious adverse events (SAEs) were classified as blood and lymphatic system disorders, with the highest percentage reported as painful crisis. The second most frequent SAEs in SSA, North Africa/Middle East, and Europe were various infections and infestations. The second most frequent in the Americas was respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders; all were reported as acute chest syndrome. The overall rate of VOCs (events per patient-year) was 3.2 in Europe, 3.0 in the Americas, 2.6 in SSA, and 2.0 in North Africa/Middle East. The percentage of patients hospitalized for VOCs was greatest in Europe (76.9%) compared to other regions (28.4-57.9%); however, mean hospital stay per VOC was similar across regions (5.3-6.2 days). The percentage of VOCs causing hospitalization was highest in Europe (67.7%), followed by North Africa/Middle East (48.7%), the Americas (46.5%), and SSA (26.4%). In SSA, the majority of VOCs were managed as outpatient hospital visits (67.9%), whereas other regions more frequently used inpatient hospital visits (33.2-55.2%). Regardless of region, almost all VOCs were treated with analgesics (overall: 99.5%) and approximately half were treated with intravenous (IV) fluids (overall: 54.4%). In contrast, the proportion of VOC-related transfusions was greater in North Africa/Middle East and Europe (18.6% and 18.8%) than in the Americas and SSA (10.0% and 6.4%). Conclusions: In the DOVE study, management of VOCs with analgesics and IV fluids was similar across regions. However, there were regional differences in VOC-related hospitalizations and transfusions that may reflect differences in culture, utilization of resources, disease severity, or a combination of factors. References: 1Heeney MM, et al. A multinational trial of prasugrel for sickle cell vaso-occlusive events. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:625-635. Disclosures Colombatti: Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding. Heeney:Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; Sancilio and Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hoppe:Eli Lilly and Company: Consultancy. Ogutu:Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding. Hassab:Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding. Zhou:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment, Other: Minor Shareholder. Yao:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Brown:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment, Other: Minor Shareholder. Heath:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment. Jakubowski:Eli Lilly and Company: Employment, Other: Minor Shareholder. Abboud:Eli Lilly and Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MAST Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3100-3100
Author(s):  
Biree Andemariam ◽  
Maureen Achebe ◽  
E. Leila Jerome Clay ◽  
Richard A. Drachtman ◽  
Archana Sharma ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited systemic disorder in which sickle hemoglobin (HbS) polymerization triggers red blood cell sickling, chronic hemolytic anemia, and recurrent episodes of vaso-occlusion. SCD-related complications lead to acute and chronic life-threatening events, cumulative organ damage, disability, and early mortality. Voxelotor (Oxbryta ®) tablets are approved in the United States for treatment of SCD in adults and adolescents aged ≥12 years, based on the efficacy and safety data from the randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter HOPE trial. Voxelotor is an oral, once-daily HbS-polymerization inhibitor that has been shown to increase hemoglobin (Hb) levels and reduce markers of hemolysis. The Retrospective Study to Evaluate Outcomes in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease Treated with Oxbryta (RETRO) is designed to collect, aggregate, and characterize real-world, retrospective laboratory and clinical data on adults and adolescents with SCD treated with voxelotor as part of their usual care at multiple clinical centers in the United States. Methods: RETRO is a multicenter, post-marketing, retrospective study of approximately 300 patients (aged ≥12 years) with SCD from 10 US study sites. Independent SCD expertise is provided by a steering committee to inform the design and conduct of the voxelotor registry. Clinical and laboratory data have been collected and aggregated 12 months before initiation of voxelotor treatment and compared with post-treatment data outcomes. Patients with documented SCD (all genotypes) who received voxelotor treatment for ≥2 consecutive weeks were included in this analysis. Only data available from patients' medical records (and other secondary data sources) 1 year before and up to 1 year after the first voxelotor dose were documented in de-identified case report forms via an electronic data capture system. Results: Forty-nine patients whose data were entered at 5 sites at the time of data cutoff (June 25, 2021) were included (mean age [SD]: 34.3 [12.91] years; 57.1% female; 85.7% HbSS and 6.1% HbSβ 0 genotype). Mean (SD) duration of voxelotor treatment was 48.1 (23.0) weeks. The initial prescribed voxelotor dose strengths (n, %) were 500 mg (4, 8.2%), 1000 mg (7, 14.3%), and 1500 mg (38, 77.6%). Rationale for prescription (n, %) included reduction of anemia (36, 73.5%), reduction in frequency of vaso-occlusive crises (23, 46.9%), reduction in pain (34, 69.4%), reduction in the need for blood transfusion (8, 16.3%) and other (5, 10.2%); more than 1 reason may have been selected. In 35 patients with recorded baseline and post-treatment Hb values, the peak observed post-treatment Hb (mean [SD]) was 9.4 (2.44) g/dL, an increase of 1.6 (1.5) g/dL from baseline (7.8 [2.02] g/dL). Fifty percent (11/22) of patients had a clinical response (Hb increase of &gt;1.0 g/dL from baseline) within 12 months of voxelotor treatment. Per-patient peak changes in Hb during the study period showed that 62.9% of patients experienced a response at some time up to 12 months during treatment (Figure). Change in hemolytic markers was also evaluated. In patients with recorded baseline and post-treatment reticulocyte percentage (N=19) and indirect bilirubin (N=24), the mean (SD) absolute post-treatment value was 7.4% (4.65%) for reticulocyte percentage, a decrease of 4.9% (6.63%) compared with baseline (12.4% [8.32%]), and 1.9 (1.66) mg/dL for indirect bilirubin, a decrease of 17.7 (81.83) mg/dL compared with baseline (19.6 [81.82] mg/dL). The most common non-SCD-related treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea, headache, and rash (Table); 19 (38.8%) patients reported ≥1 AE, and most non-SCD-related AEs were mild in severity. Conclusions: RETRO is the first multicenter, retrospective study to examine the real-world effectiveness of voxelotor and describe the observed changes in laboratory and clinical outcomes after ≥2 weeks of therapy. This study shows that voxelotor treatment was associated with increased Hb levels and decreased hemolytic markers. The safety data are consistent with those from the HOPE trial. Further evaluation is needed, with additional data from all 10 sites, and will be presented later. Funding: This study was supported by Global Blood Therapeutics. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Achebe: Fulcrum Therapeutics: Consultancy; Pharmacosmos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Clay: GBT: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria. Nero: Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy; Editas Medicine: Consultancy; bluebird bio: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Osunkwo: Terumo: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Acceleron: Consultancy; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Health and Services Administration: Research Funding; Patient Centered Outcomes Research Instituted: Research Funding; Micella Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Chiesi: Consultancy; Cyclerion: Consultancy; Emmaus: Consultancy. Idowu: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ironwood: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Shah: Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Emmaus: Consultancy; GBT: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; GLG: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy. Curtis: GBT: Consultancy. Minniti: Bluebird Bio: Other: Endpoint adjudicator ; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy; Chiesi: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Forma: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; GBT: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Other: Endpoint adjudicator .


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1835-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina M Piedra ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
Larry W. Buie ◽  
Sean M. Devlin ◽  
Jessica Flynn ◽  
...  

Introduction Immunomodulatory agents (IMiD's) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly when combined with high dose steroids. Studies evaluating the use of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) and carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) in the frontline setting for multiple myeloma (MM) have reported a 6% and 24% incidence of thrombosis, respectively, despite primary thrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin (ASA) (Richardson, et al. Blood. 2010; Korde, et al. JAMA Oncol 2015). Recent data, including the Hokusai VTE Cancer Trial, have suggested that safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preserved in the setting of treatment of solid malignancy-associated thrombosis (Raskob, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Mantha, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017). Despite this data, there is limited experience and use of DOACs in prevention of thromboses in the setting of hematologic malignancies, specifically MM. After careful review of literature, since early 2018, we changed our clinical practice and routinely placed newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving KRD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, regardless of VTE risk stratification. In the following abstract, we present VTE rates and safety data for newly diagnosed MM patients receiving RVD with ASA vs. KRD with ASA vs. KRD with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. Methods This was an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study. All untreated patients with newly diagnosed MM, receiving at least one cycle of RVD or KRD between January 2015 and October 2018 were included. The period of observation included the time between the first day of therapy until 90 days after completion of induction therapy. Patients were identified by querying the pharmacy database for carfilzomib or bortezomib administration and outpatient medication review of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or ASA. VTE diagnoses were confirmed by ICD-10 codes and appropriate imaging studies (computed tomography and ultrasound). Descriptive statistics were performed. Results During the observation period, 241 patients were identified to have received RVD or KRD in the frontline (99 RVD with ASA; 97 KRD with ASA; 45 KRD with rivaroxaban). Baseline characteristics were well distributed among the three arms, with a median age of 60 (30-94) in the RVD ASA arm, 62 (33-77) in the KRD ASA arm, and 60 (24-79) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease in 13% (N=13), 9.3% (N=9), and 11% (N=5) of the RVD ASA, KRD ASA, and KRD rivaroxaban arms, respectively. Median weekly doses of dexamethasone were higher in both KRD arms, 40 mg (20-40) vs. 20 mg (10-40) in the RVD ASA arm. The average initial doses of lenalidomide were 22 mg in the RVD ASA arm compared to 25 mg in both the KRD ASA and KRD rivaroxaban arms. After querying the pharmacy database, no patients were identified to have a history or concomitant use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use. Treatment-related VTE's occurred in 4 patients (4.0%) in the RVD ASA arm, 16 patients (16.5%) in the KRD ASA arm, and in 1 patient (2.2%) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Average time to VTE was 6.15 months (Range 5.42, 9.73) after treatment initiation in the RVD ASA group, while it was 2.61 months (Range 0.43, 5.06) in the KRD ASA group and 1.35 months in the KRD rivaroxaban group. Minor, grade 1 bleeding events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were identified in 1 (1.1%) patient in the RVD ASA arm, 5 (5.2%) patients in the KRD ASA arm, and 1 (2.2%) patient in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Conclusion More efficacious MM combination therapies have been found to increase the risk of VTE when using ASA prophylaxis, indicating better thromboprophylaxis is needed. We found patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with KRD were more likely to experience a VTE and these events occurred earlier compared to patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with RVD. Importantly, the rate of VTE was reduced to the same level as ASA prophylaxis with RVD when low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was used with KRD, and without necessarily increasing bleeding risk. Our retrospective data support the development of prospective clinical trials further investigating DOAC use in thromboprophylaxis for NDMM patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatments. Figure Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landgren:Theradex: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of rivaroxaban for outpatient prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be explicitly disclosed to the audience.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 559-559
Author(s):  
Alyssa H. Cull ◽  
Michael Spencer Chapman ◽  
Marioara Ciuculescu ◽  
Emily Mitchell ◽  
Myriam Armant ◽  
...  

Abstract Recent advances in clonal stem cell tracking strategies have enabled interrogation of unperturbed human hematopoiesis. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) can be used to map the clonal dynamics of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) by employing spontaneous somatic mutations as unique clonal tags (Lee-Six et al., Nature, 2018). These tags allow for retrospective analysis of individual stem cell clones and the construction of phylogenetic trees mapping out stem cell relatedness, with mutations being acquired in a near-linear fashion over the course of an individual's life. The unprecedented level of information obtained in these studies is particularly well-suited to understanding genomic changes in gene therapy trials aimed at curing diseases such as sickle cell disease (SCD). In addition to mapping relatedness between stem cells, sequencing data can be used to better define mutational signatures for HSPC clones that have been successfully gene-modified as well as those that lack an integrated copy of the therapeutic vector. Given this method's ability to identify low frequency mutations in individual HSPC clones, mutations with extremely low variant allele frequencies can be detected much more readily than through traditional bulk sequencing approaches, something that is particularly relevant given recent safety concerns in some SCD gene therapy trials. In this study, we have mapped the clonal dynamics of HSPCs obtained from pre- and post-gene therapy samples from 4 SCD patients who have undergone autologous gene therapy performed using a BCL11A shmiR lentivirus vector (NCT 03282656, 12-36 months follow-up). HSPCs from mobilized peripheral blood (pre-gene therapy), bone marrow aspirates (both pre- and post-gene therapy) or unmobilized peripheral blood (post-gene therapy) were expanded as single clones and 1508 individual colonies were then sequenced using WGS to an average sequencing depth of 12.3x. Initial results indicate that the mean mutation burden per cell in a pre-gene therapy sample is elevated for some patients compared to what would be expected based on patient age in similar studies. In pre-gene therapy samples, the structure of the phylogenetic trees appeared to be highly polyclonal, indicating that there were no significant clonal expansion events prior to gene therapy. In one patient where we undertook extensive profiling, approximately 15-20 excess mutations per HSPC were observed across the entire genome 24 months after transplantation, presumably acquired as a consequence of gene therapy and/or reconstitution post-transplantation, which is equivalent to approximately one year of normal ageing without a transplantation intervention. However, no clonal expansions or driver mutations were identified at this 24 month follow-up timepoint, suggesting that no strong selective advantage or pre-leukemic events were present prior to or following the gene therapy protocol. Extending this approach to a wider range and larger number of patients will allow for comprehensive mapping of the genomic landscape and clonal evolution of stem cells in sickle cell patients and will also set the stage for improved assessment of safety and potential leukemia-initiating events in the context of gene therapy. Disclosures Esrick: bluebird bio: Consultancy. Williams: bluebird bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Insertion Site Analysis Advisory Board, Patents & Royalties: BCH licensed certain IP relevant to hemoglobinopathies to bluebird bio. The current license includes the potential for future royalty/milestone income. Bluebird has indicated they will not pursue this as a clinical program and BCH is negotiating return of, Research Funding; BioMarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Insertion Site Advisory Board; Beam Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Emerging Therapy Solutions: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chief Scientific Chair; Geneception: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Alerion Biosciences: Other: Co-founder (now licensed to Avro Bio, potential for future milestones/royalties); Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Steering Committee, Novartis ETB115E2201 (eltrombopag in aplastic anemia). Advisory fees donated to NAPAAC.; Orchard Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Membership on a safety advisory board (SAB): SAB position ended 05/20/2021. Co-founder , Patents & Royalties: Potential for future royalty/milestone income, X-SCID. Provided GMP vector for clinical trial, Research Funding. Campbell: Mu Genomics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kent: STRM.bio: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document