Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Identifies Expression Patterns Associated with Clinical Responses to Dual-Targeted CAR-T Cell Therapy

INTRODUCTION: Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is emerging as a powerful treatment for relapsed or refractory B cell lymphomas. However, a variety of escape mechanisms prevent CAR-T cell therapy from being more uniformly effective. To better understand mechanisms of CAR-T failure among patients treated with dual-targeted CAR-T cells, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing of samples from a Phase 1 trial (NCT03019055). The clinical trial used anti-CD20, anti-CD19 CAR-T cells for the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Clinical responses from this study are reported independently (Shah et al. in press in Nat Med). While robust clinical responses occurred, not all patients had similar outcomes. In single-antigen specific CAR-T cells, mechanisms of resistance include antigen down-regulation, phenotype switch, or PD-1 inhibition (Song et al. Int J Mol Sci 2019). However, very little is understood about the mechanisms of failure that are specific to dual-targeted CAR-T cells. Interestingly, loss of CD19 antigen was not observed in treatment failures in the study. METHODS: De-identified patient samples were obtained as peripheral blood mononuclear cells on the day of harvest ("pre" samples), at the peak of in vivo CAR-T cell expansion which varied from day 10 to day 21 after infusion ("peak" samples), and on day 28 post-infusion ("d28" samples). The CAR-T cell infusion product was obtained on day 14 of on-site manufacturing ("product" samples). All samples were cryopreserved and single cell preparation was performed with batched samples using 10X Genomics kits. Subsequent analysis was performed in R studio using the Seurat package (Butler et al. Nat Biotech 2018) with SingleR being used to identify cell types in an unbiased manner (Aran et al. Nat Immunol 2019). RESULTS: We found that distinct T cell clusters were similarly represented in the responder and non-responder samples. The patients' clinical responses did not depend on the level of CAR expression or the percentage of CAR+ cells in the infusion product. At day 28, however, there was a considerable decrease in the percentage of CAR+ cells in the responder samples possibly due to contracture of the CAR+ T cell compartment after successful clearance of antigen-positive cells. In all samples, the CAR-T cell population shifted from a CD4+ to a CD8+ T cell predominant population after infusion. We performed differentially-expressed gene analyses (DEG) of the total and CAR-T cells. In the pre samples, genes associated with T-cell stimulation and cell-mediated cytotoxicity were highly expressed in the responder samples. Since the responders had an effective anti-tumor response, we expected these pathways to also be enriched for in the peak samples; however, this was not the case. We hypothesize that differential expression of the above genes was masked due to homeostatic expansion of the T cells following conditioning chemotherapy. Based on the DEG results, we next interrogated specific genes associated with cytotoxicity, T cell co-stimulation, and checkpoint protein inhibition. Cytotoxicity-associated genes were highly expressed among responder CD8+ T cells in the pre samples, but not in the other samples (Figure 1). Few differences were seen in specific co-stimulatory and checkpoint inhibitor genes at any timepoint in the T cell clusters. We performed gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA). Gene sets representing TCR, IFN-gamma, and PD-1 signaling were significantly increased in the pre samples of the responders but not at later time points or in the infusion products. DISCUSSION: We found a correlation between expression of genes associated with T cell stimulation and cytotoxicity in pre-treatment patient samples and subsequent response to CAR-T cell therapy. This demonstrates that the existing transcriptome of T cells prior to CAR transduction critically shapes anti-tumor responses. Further work will discover biomarkers that can be used to select patients expected to have better clinical outcomes. Figure 1 Disclosures Johnson: Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding; Cell Vault: Research Funding. Schneider:Lentigen, a Miltenyi Biotec Company: Current Employment, Patents & Royalties. Dropulic:Lentigen, a Miltenyi Biotec Company: Current Employment, Patents & Royalties: CAR-T immunotherapy. Hari:BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Shah:Incyte: Consultancy; Cell Vault: Research Funding; Lily: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Verastim: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Iomab with Adoptive Cellular Therapy (Iomab-ACT): A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed By CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-144994 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4810-4810

Author(s):

Mark B. Geyer ◽

Briana Cadzin ◽

Elizabeth Halton ◽

Peter Kane ◽

Brigitte Senechal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Therapy ◽

B Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T

Abstract Background: Autologous CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T-cell therapy leads to complete responses (CR) in patients (pts) with (w/) relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL, >80% CR rate) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, ~40-55% CR rate). However, following fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (Flu/Cy) conditioning and CAR T-cell therapy w/ a CD28 costimulatory domain (e.g. 19-28z CAR T-cells), rates of grade ≥3 ICANS and grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) in pts w/ R/R DLBCL and morphologic R/R B-ALL exceed 30%. CRS and ICANS are associated w/ considerable morbidity, including increased length of hospitalization, and may be fatal. Host monocytes appear to be the major reservoir of cytokines driving CRS and ICANS post-CAR T-cell therapy (Giavradis et al. and Norelli et al., Nature Medicine, 2018). Circulating monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) may also blunt efficacy of 19-28z CAR T-cells in R/R DLBCL (Jain et al., Blood, 2021). The CD45-targeted antibody radioconjugate (ARC) 131-I apamistamab is being investigated at myeloablative doses as conditioning prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation in pts w/ R/R acute myeloid leukemia. However, even at low doses (4-20 mCi), transient lymphocyte and blast reduction are observed. Preclinical studies in C57BL/6 mice demonstrate low-dose anti CD45 radioimmunotherapy (100 microCi) transiently depletes >90% lymphocytes, including CD4/CD8 T-cells, B-cells, NK cells, and T-regs, as well as splenocytes and MDSCs, w/ negligible effect on bone marrow (BM) hematopoietic stem cells (Dawicki et al., Oncotarget, 2020). We hypothesized a higher, yet nonmyeloablative dose of 131-I apamistamab may achieve more sustained, but reversible depletion of lymphocytes and other CD45 + immune cells, including monocytes thought to drive CRS/ICANS. We additionally hypothesized this approach (vs Flu/Cy) prior to CAR T-cell therapy would promote CAR T-cell expansion while reducing CSF levels of monocyte-derived cytokines (e.g. IL-1, IL-6, and IL-10), thus lowering the risk of severe ICANS (Fig 1A). Study design and methods: We are conducting a single-institution pilot study of 131-I apamistamab in lieu of Flu/Cy prior to 19-28z CAR T-cells in adults w/ R/R BALL or DLBCL (NCT04512716; Iomab-ACT); accrual is ongoing. Pts are eligible for leukapheresis if they are ≥18 years-old w/ R/R DLBCL (de novo or transformed) following ≥2 chemoimmunotherapy regimens w/ ≥1 FDG-avid measurable lesion or B-ALL following ≥1 line of multi-agent chemotherapy (R/R following induction/consolidation; prior 2 nd/3 rd gen TKI required for pts w/ Ph+ ALL) w/ ≥5% BM involvement and/or FDG-avid extramedullary disease, ECOG performance status 0-2, and w/ appropriate organ function. Active or prior CNS disease is not exclusionary. Pts previously treated w/ CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy are eligible as long as CD19 expression is retained. See Fig 1B/C: Post-leukapheresis, 19-28z CAR T-cells are manufactured as previously described (Park et al., NEJM, 2018). Bridging therapy is permitted at investigator discretion. Thyroid blocking is started ≥48h pre-ARC. 131-I apamistamab 75 mCi is administered 5-7 days pre-CAR T-cell infusion to achieve total absorbed marrow dose ~200 cGy w/ remaining absorbed dose <25 cGy at time of T-cell infusion. 19-28z CAR T-cells are administered as a single infusion (1x10 6/kg, B-ALL pts; 2x10 6/kg, DLBCL pts). The primary objective is to determine safety/tolerability of 131-I apamistamab 75 mCi given prior to 19-28z CAR T-cells in pts w/ R/R B-ALL/DLBCL. Secondary objectives include determining incidence/severity of ICANS and CRS, anti-tumor efficacy, and 19-28z CAR T-cell expansion/persistence. Key exploratory objectives include describing the cellular microenvironment following ARC and 19-28z CAR T-cell infusion using spectral cytometry, as well as cytokine levels in peripheral blood and CRS. The trial utilizes a 3+3 design in a single cohort. If dose-limiting toxicity (severe infusion-related reactions, treatment-resistant severe CRS/ICANS, persistent regimen-related cytopenias, among others defined in protocol) is seen in 0-1 of the first 3 pts treated, then up to 6 total (up to 3 additional) pts will be treated. We have designed this study to provide preliminary data to support further investigation of CD45-targeted ARCs prior to adoptive cellular therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Geyer: Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Geoghegan: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Reddy: Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Berger: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Ludwig: Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Current Employment. Pandit-Taskar: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Clarity Pharma: Research Funding; Illumina: Consultancy, Honoraria; ImaginAb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ymabs: Research Funding; Progenics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Medimmune/Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding. Sauter: Genmab: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: 131-I apamistamab and 19-28z CAR T-cells are investigational agents in treatment of ALL and DLBCL

Download Full-text

Clinical Experience of CAR T Cell Immunotherapy for Relapsed and Refractory Infant ALL Demonstrates Feasibility and Favorable Responses

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-131447 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3869-3869 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Colleen Annesley ◽

Corinne Summers ◽

Michael A. Pulsipher ◽

Alan S. Wayne ◽

Julie Rivers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Lineage Switch ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T

Background: The youngest patients referred for CAR T cell therapy are those with relapsed or refractory (R/R) KMT2A-rearranged infant B-ALL. Infants with relapsed ALL following Interfant-99 therapy have a dismal reported 3-yr OS of 20.9%, indicating the need for novel therapies. Smaller patient size, heavily pre-treated disease and high leukemia burden are often characteristics of this subgroup of patients that pose unique challenges to apheresis and manufacture of a T cell product. Additionally, reports of KMT2A-rearranged leukemia undergoing lineage switch following CD19-targeting pressure raises concern for an increased risk of myeloid leukemia relapses after B-lineage targeted CAR T cell therapy in this population. Here we report our experience using CAR T cell immunotherapy for patients with R/R infant ALL enrolled on clinical trials PLAT-02 (NCT02028455) and PLAT-05 (NCT03330691). Methods: PLAT-02 is a phase 1/2 trial of CD19-specific (FMC63scFv:IgG4hinge:CD28tm:4-1BB:ζ) CAR T cells. PLAT-05 is a phase 1 trial of CD19xCD22 dual specific CAR T cells, transduced with two separate lentiviral vectors to direct the co-expression of the CD19-specific CAR above and a CD22-specific CAR (m971scFv:IgG4hinge-CH2(L235D)-CH3-CD28tm:4-1BB:ζ). Eligible subjects on both studies have R/R B-ALL, an absolute lymphocyte count ≥100 cells/µL, and were at least 1 year of age. In addition, subjects on PLAT-02 were ≥ 10kg, and ≥ 8kg on PLAT-05. For cell manufacture, apheresis products were immuno-magnetically selected for CD4 and CD8 cells. Selected T cells were activated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads, transduced, and grown in culture with homeostatic cytokines to numbers suitable for clinical use. Infant ALL subjects received a range of 5x105 to 10x106 CAR+ T cells/kg following lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Disease response assessments were required at Day 21 and Day 63 following CAR T cell infusion. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAEv4, except CRS which was graded according to 2014 Lee criteria. Results: Eighteen subjects with R/R infant ALL have enrolled on PLAT-02 (n=14) or PLAT-05 (n=4), with a median age of 22.5 months at enrollment (range: 14.5 - 40.1 months). Of these, 2 (11.1%) had primary refractory disease, 8 (44.4%) were in 1st relapse, 7 (38.9%) were in 2nd relapse and 1 (5.6%) was in 3rd or greater relapse. Ten subjects (55.6%) had an M2 marrow or greater at enrollment prior to apheresis, and 9/18 had a history of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). The mean ALC was 1309 cells/µL (range 253-6944). Successful CAR T cell products were manufactured in 17/18 subjects, including in 9/9 subjects with no prior history of HCT. Of these, 16/17 subjects with available products were infused, with a median follow up of 26.9 months. One subject died of disease complications prior to CAR T cell infusion. Of the 16 treated subjects, 1 is pending disease and toxicity assessments. The maximum grade of CRS was 3 and occurred in two of 15 evaluable subjects (13%) and neurotoxicity was limited to a maximum grade of 2. Fourteen of 15 (93.3%) achieved an MRD negative complete remission (MRD-CR) by Day 21. Of the 14 subjects with an MRD-CR, 6 went on to HCT with 1 subsequent CD19 negative relapse. Of the 8 subjects who did not proceed to HCT, 1 developed lineage switch at one month following CAR T cells, and 1 died of infectious complications with aplasia. A "wait and watch" approach was taken for the remaining 6 subjects, and 2 developed CD19+ relapse. The incidence of lineage switch among the infant ALL group was 1/15 (6.7%). The estimated 1-year LFS was 66.7% and 1-year OS was 71.4%. Conclusion: This is the largest reported cohort to date of R/R infant B-ALL subjects treated with CAR T cell therapy. We report successful manufacture and administration of a CAR T cell product in the significant majority of infant subjects. Toxicity and MRD-CR rates are comparable to that of non-infant ALL subjects. In our experience, subjects with R/R infant ALL are not at increased risk for lineage switch relapse compared with the entire study populations following B-antigen targeting CAR T cell immunotherapy. Numbers in this report are too small to make definitive conclusions about the value of consolidative HCT. However, the LFS of this cohort is remarkably higher when compared with historical controls. Future work is focused on overcoming feasibility issues for the smallest of subjects, to enable a larger number of these cases to access CAR T cell therapy. Disclosures Pulsipher: Amgen: Other: Lecture; Bellicum: Consultancy; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Medac: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Other: Education for employees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wayne:AbbVie: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jensen:Bluebird Bio: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics, a Celgene Company: Research Funding. Gardner:Novartis: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

The Lymphoma Tumor Microenvironment Influences Toxicity after CD19 CAR T Cell Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127305 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4105-4105 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Michael D. Jain ◽

Rawan Faramand ◽

Verena Staedtke ◽

Renyuan Bai ◽

Sae Bom Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Myeloid Cells ◽

T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T

Introduction: Of patients receiving CD19 CAR T cell therapy for large B cell lymphoma (LBCL), approximately 1 in 10 experience severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and 1 in 3 experience severe neurotoxicity. While CAR T cells trigger the onset of these toxicities, CRS and neurotoxicity are thought to occur as a consequence of activated myeloid cells amplifying cytokine and catecholamine release, thereby stimulating inflammation both systemically and at the blood-brain barrier. However, patient and tumor-related factors that account for differences in the amount of toxicity remain poorly understood. Methods: Serum cytokine levels were measured on an ELLA point of care device prior to lymphodepleting chemotherapy and throughout inpatient treatment with CD19 CAR T cell therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel) for LBCL. Catecholamine levels were measured as we have previously reported. Tumor biopsies were taken within 1 month prior to infusion of CAR T cells. RNA expression was measured by RNAseq and/or a Nanostring IO360 panel consisting of 770 genes found in the tumor microenvironment (TME) in cancer. Analysis used nSolver to identify cell types, GSEA and differential gene expression between groups. Mouse CAR T cell studies utilized mouse CD19-targeted CAR T cells derived from C57BL/6 splenocytes and cultured in vitro with myeloid cells and target cells to evaluate cytotoxicity and/or cytokine secretion. Elicited mouse macrophages were collected from peritoneal fluid 4 days after IP injection of 3% Brewer's thioglycollate medium. In vivo studies with mouse CD19-targeted CAR T cells were performed in IL2Ra-/- mice given cyclophosphamide as a pre-conditioning chemotherapy followed by adoptive transfer and analyses for CAR T cell and B cell persistence, as well as cytokines. Results: Of 58 patients undergoing CD19 CAR T cell therapy for LBCL, 8 (14%) had severe (grade 3 or higher) CRS and 16 (28%) had severe (grade 3 or higher) neurotoxicity. At baseline, peripheral blood levels of IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-15 and ferritin were significantly higher in patients who would subsequently experience severe CRS and severe neurotoxicity. Confirming our recent animal model of CRS we determined that peak serum catecholamine levels were higher in patients experiencing severe CRS. To identify if myeloid cells potentiate cytokine release we co-cultured CAR T cells with CD19 target and macrophages obtained from elicited mouse peritoneum. When these macrophages were added, IL-6 release from CAR T cells significantly increased compared to when macrophages were absent. Next, we studied the baseline TME in LBCL CAR T patients. Of 36 patients, 10 (27%) experienced severe neurotoxicity following CAR T cell therapy. By cell type score, the severe neurotoxicity group had a lower expression of genes associated with T cells overall and specifically Tregs. Also significantly lower in the severe neurotoxicity group were T cell genes including multiple subunits of CD3, CD3ζ, FOXP3, ICOS, CD62L and others. Association of increased T cell infiltration in the TME with low neurotoxicity raised the possibility that suppressive T cell subsets play a role in limiting toxicity post-CAR T cell therapy. To test this hypothesis, we injected CD19-targeted CAR T cells into an immune competent mouse model of Treg depletion (IL2Ra-/-) with established CD19+ leukemia. Treg deficient mice experienced a massive cytokine release after CAR T infusion and died prematurely due to CAR T toxicity compared to control mice with Tregs intact. Conclusions: Our observations suggest that the incidence of severe toxicity following CD19 CAR T cell therapy is influenced by baseline characteristics that are present prior to the infusion of CAR T cells. These include systemic inflammation characterized by high cytokine levels and a TME notable for a lack of infiltrating T cells. We posit a model whereby inflammation primes myeloid cells that are further activated upon CAR T cell infusion to release toxic amounts of cytokines and catecholamines. T cell subsets in the TME may modulate CAR T cells at the site of antigen encounter and prevent excessive CAR T activation. Reducing systemic inflammation or encouraging T cell infiltration into tumor prior to CAR T infusion are potential strategies for lowering the toxicity associated with CAR T therapy. Disclosures Jain: Kite/Gilead: Consultancy. Chavez:Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Bachmeier:Kite/Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Mullinax:Iovance: Research Funding. Locke:Novartis: Other: Scientific Advisor; Cellular BioMedicine Group Inc.: Consultancy; Kite: Other: Scientific Advisor. Davila:Anixa: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Atara: Research Funding; Bellicum: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

A Phase I/II Clinical Trial of Piggybac-Modified GMR CAR-T Cell Therapy for CD116 Positive Relapsed/Refractory Myeloid Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149089 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4813-4813

Author(s):

Shoji Saito ◽

Miyuki Tanaka ◽

Aiko Hasegawa ◽

Yoichi Inada ◽

Hirokazu Morokawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

T Cell Therapy ◽

Myeloid Malignancies ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T

Abstract Background: The prognosis of relapsed/refractory (R/R) myeloid malignancies remains poor, and the development of novel treatment strategies is crucial. Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cell therapy for B cell malignancies has shown excellent clinical efficacy, the use of CAR-T cells for myeloid malignancies has been more challenging, partly due to the heterogeneous expression of candidate target antigens in leukemia cells and shared expression of those antigens in normal myeloid cells or progenitor cells. We previously developed the piggyBac-modified chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells targeting CD116, also known as GM-CSF receptor alpha chain (GMR) (Nakazawa Y, et al. J Hematol Oncol. 2016 and Hasegawa A, et al. Clin Transl Immunology. 2021). GMR CAR-T cells showed substantial antitumor effects against both acute myeloid leukemia and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Moreover, modulation of the spacer and antigen recognition site of the CAR vector further enhanced the anti-tumor effects of GMR CAR-T cells. GMR CAR-T cells showed an acceptable safety profile with limited cytotoxicity on normal hematopoietic cells except monocytes. Based on these results, we have initiated a first-in-human clinical trial of GMR CAR-T cell therapy in March 2021 in Japan. Study Design and Methods: The study is a phase I/II, single-center, dose-escalation study with a traditional 3+3 dose-escalation design (Table 1). Maximum of 18 patients will be recruited. Primary objectives of this study are to determine the safety and severe adverse events of piggyBac-modified GMR CAR-T cells for CD116 + relapsed/refractory myeloid malignancies by assessing the dose-limiting toxicity within 28 days from the single infusion of GMR CAR-T cells. The patients with CD116 + myeloid malignancies aged more than 1 year with myeloid malignancies who experienced an induction failure or a relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) will be recruited. CD116 is defined as positive when a CD116 relative mean fluorescence (RFI) in leukemia cells ≥ 2. RFI was calculated by dividing the MFI of samples with that of the isotype control. Major exclusion criteria are as follows, acute promyelocytic leukemia, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (Grade ≥ 2), extensive chronic GVHD, and concurrent treatment with corticosteroid (≥ 6 mg/m2). Statistical analysis will be performed when the data will be fixed. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells will be harvested from the patient by leukapheresis and then will be transduced with GMR CAR vector by piggyBac transposon system. All manufacturing process of GMR CAR-T cells is performed in Cell Processing Center in Shinshu University Hospital under good manufacturing practice conditions. The patient will be treated with lymphodepleting chemotherapy consisting of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, followed by CAR-T cell infusion. The dose of CAR-T cells will be 3 x 10 5 and 1 x 10 6 in cohorts 1 & 2 and cohort 3, respectively (Table 1). Kinetics of GMR CAR-T cells will be determined by quantifying the GMR CAR gene in the peripheral blood using real-time PCR after the CAR-T cell infusion. All the patients will be required to receive HSCT by day 56 following CAR-T cell infusion. The primary endpoint of the study is the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of GMR CAR-T therapy (Trial registration: jRCT2033210029). Conclusion: We herein described the protocol of first-in-human GMR CAR-T cells for relapsed/refractory myeloid malignancies. By employing the optimized CAR vector and production protocol, the safety and efficacy of GMR CAR-T cells will be evaluated in this study. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Saito: Toshiba corporation: Research Funding. Yagyu: AGC Inc.: Research Funding. Nakazawa: AGC Inc.: Research Funding; Toshiba Corporation: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Anti-Mesothelin CAR T cell therapy for malignant mesothelioma

Biomarker Research ◽

10.1186/s40364-021-00264-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Laura Castelletti ◽

Dannel Yeo ◽

Nico van Zandwijk ◽

John E. J. Rasko

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Therapy ◽

Malignant Mesothelioma ◽

Oncolytic Viruses ◽

T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T

AbstractMalignant mesothelioma (MM) is a treatment-resistant tumor originating in the mesothelial lining of the pleura or the abdominal cavity with very limited treatment options. More effective therapeutic approaches are urgently needed to improve the poor prognosis of MM patients. Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has emerged as a novel potential treatment for this incurable solid tumor. The tumor-associated antigen mesothelin (MSLN) is an attractive target for cell therapy in MM, as this antigen is expressed at high levels in the diseased pleura or peritoneum in the majority of MM patients and not (or very modestly) present in healthy tissues. Clinical trials using anti-MSLN CAR T cells in MM have shown that this potential therapeutic is relatively safe. However, efficacy remains modest, likely due to the MM tumor microenvironment (TME), which creates strong immunosuppressive conditions and thus reduces anti-MSLN CAR T cell tumor infiltration, efficacy and persistence. Various approaches to overcome these challenges are reviewed here. They include local (intratumoral) delivery of anti-MSLN CAR T cells, improved CAR design and co-stimulation, and measures to avoid T cell exhaustion. Combination therapies with checkpoint inhibitors as well as oncolytic viruses are also discussed. Preclinical studies have confirmed that increased efficacy of anti-MSLN CAR T cells is within reach and offer hope that this form of cellular immunotherapy may soon improve the prognosis of MM patients.

Download Full-text

Metabolic and Mitochondrial Functioning in Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)—T Cells

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13061229 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (6) ◽

pp. 1229

Author(s):

Ali Hosseini Rad S. M. ◽

Joshua Colin Halpin ◽

Mojtaba Mollaei ◽

Samuel W. J. Smith Bell ◽

Nattiya Hirankarn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Therapy ◽

Chimeric Antigen Receptor ◽

Metabolic State ◽

T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized adoptive cell therapy with impressive therapeutic outcomes of >80% complete remission (CR) rates in some haematological malignancies. Despite this, CAR T cell therapy for the treatment of solid tumours has invariably been unsuccessful in the clinic. Immunosuppressive factors and metabolic stresses in the tumour microenvironment (TME) result in the dysfunction and exhaustion of CAR T cells. A growing body of evidence demonstrates the importance of the mitochondrial and metabolic state of CAR T cells prior to infusion into patients. The different T cell subtypes utilise distinct metabolic pathways to fulfil their energy demands associated with their function. The reprogramming of CAR T cell metabolism is a viable approach to manufacture CAR T cells with superior antitumour functions and increased longevity, whilst also facilitating their adaptation to the nutrient restricted TME. This review discusses the mitochondrial and metabolic state of T cells, and describes the potential of the latest metabolic interventions to maximise CAR T cell efficacy for solid tumours.

Download Full-text

IMMU-45. COMBINATION OF EGFRVIII CAR T-CELL THERAPY AND PARACRINE GAM MODULATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF GBM

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noab196.404 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽

pp. vi102-vi103

Author(s):

Tomás A Martins ◽

Marie-Françoise Ritz ◽

Tala Shekarian ◽

Philip Schmassmann ◽

Deniz Kaymak ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Therapy ◽

Differential Expression Analysis ◽

Dependent Manner ◽

T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T

Abstract The GBM immune tumor microenvironment mainly consists of protumoral glioma-associated microglia and macrophages (GAMs). We have previously shown that blockade of CD47, a ‘don't eat me’-signal overexpressed by GBM cells, rescued GAMs' phagocytic function in mice. However, monotherapy with CD47 blockade has been ineffective in treating human solid tumors to date. Thus, we propose a combinatorial approach of local CAR T cell therapy with paracrine GAM modulation for a synergistic elimination of GBM. We generated humanized EGFRvIII CAR T-cells by lentiviral transduction of healthy donor human T-cells and engineered them to constitutively release a soluble SIRPγ-related protein (SGRP) with high affinity towards CD47. Tumor viability and CAR T-cell proliferation were assessed by timelapse imaging analysis in co-cultures with endogenous EGFRvIII-expressing BS153 cells. Tumor-induced CAR T-cell activation and degranulation were confirmed by flow cytometry. CAR T-cell secretomes were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Immunocompromised mice were orthotopically implanted with EGFRvIII+ BS153 cells and treated intratumorally with a single CAR T-cell injection. EGFRvIII and EGFRvIII-SGRP CAR T-cells killed tumor cells in a dose-dependent manner (72h-timepoint; complete cytotoxicity at effector-target ratio 1:1) compared to CD19 controls. CAR T-cells proliferated and specifically co-expressed CD25 and CD107a in the presence of tumor antigen (24h-timepoint; EGFRvIII: 59.3±3.00%, EGFRvIII-SGRP: 52.6±1.42%, CD19: 0.1±0.07%). Differential expression analysis of CAR T-cell secretomes identified SGRP from EGFRvIII-SGRP CAR T-cell supernatants (-Log10qValue/Log2fold-change= 3.84/6.15). Consistent with studies of systemic EGFRvIII CAR T-cell therapy, our data suggest that intratumoral EGFRvIII CAR T-cells were insufficient to eliminate BS153 tumors with homogeneous EGFRvIII expression in mice (Overall survival; EGFRvIII-treated: 20%, CD19-treated: 0%, n= 5 per group). Our current work focuses on the functional characterization of SGRP binding, SGRP-mediated phagocytosis, and on the development of a translational preclinical model of heterogeneous EGFRvIII expression to investigate an additive effect of CAR T-cell therapy and GAM modulation.

Download Full-text

124 Functionalizing CAR T cells for selective proliferation and dual-targeting using the meditope technology

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer ◽

10.1136/jitc-2021-sitc2021.124 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽

pp. A133-A133

Author(s):

Cheng-Fu Kuo ◽

Yi-Chiu Kuo ◽

Miso Park ◽

Zhen Tong ◽

Brenda Aguilar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Therapy ◽

T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T

BackgroundMeditope is a small cyclic peptide that was identified to bind to cetuximab within the Fab region. The meditope binding site can be grafted onto any Fab framework, creating a platform to uniquely and specifically target monoclonal antibodies. Here we demonstrate that the meditope binding site can be grafted onto chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) and utilized to regulate and extend CAR T cell function. We demonstrate that the platform can be used to overcome key barriers to CAR T cell therapy, including T cell exhaustion and antigen escape.MethodsMeditope-enabled CARs (meCARs) were generated by amino acid substitutions to create binding sites for meditope peptide (meP) within the Fab tumor targeting domain of the CAR. meCAR expression was validated by anti-Fc FITC or meP-Alexa 647 probes. In vitro and in vivo assays were performed and compared to standard scFv CAR T cells. For meCAR T cell proliferation and dual-targeting assays, the meditope peptide (meP) was conjugated to recombinant human IL15 fused to the CD215 sushi domain (meP-IL15:sushi) and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (meP-rituximab).ResultsWe generated meCAR T cells targeting HER2, CD19 and HER1/3 and demonstrate the selective specific binding of the meditope peptide along with potent meCAR T cell effector function. We next demonstrated the utility of a meP-IL15:sushi for enhancing meCAR T cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Proliferation and persistence of meCAR T cells was dose dependent, establishing the ability to regulate CAR T cell expansion using the meditope platform. We also demonstrate the ability to redirect meCAR T cells tumor killing using meP-antibody adaptors. As proof-of-concept, meHER2-CAR T cells were redirected to target CD20+ Raji tumors, establishing the potential of the meditope platform to alter the CAR specificity and overcome tumor heterogeneity.ConclusionsOur studies show the utility of the meCAR platform for overcoming key challenges for CAR T cell therapy by specifically regulating CAR T cell functionality. Specifically, the meP-IL15:sushi enhanced meCAR T cell persistence and proliferation following adoptive transfer in vivo and protects against T cell exhaustion. Further, meP-ritiuximab can redirect meCAR T cells to target CD20-tumors, showing the versatility of this platform to address the tumor antigen escape variants. Future studies are focused on conferring additional ‘add-on’ functionalities to meCAR T cells to potentiate the therapeutic effectiveness of CAR T cell therapy.

Download Full-text

Feasibility, and Efficacy of Donor-Derived cd19-Targeted Car t-Cell Therapy in Refractory/Relapsed(r/r)b-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (b-all) Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-137299 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4-6

Author(s):

Xian Zhang ◽

Junfang Yang ◽

Wenqian Li ◽

Gailing Zhang ◽

Yunchao Su ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Therapy ◽

T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T ◽

Grade 3

Backgrounds As CAR T-cell therapy is a highly personalized therapy, process of generating autologous CAR-T cells for each patient is complex and can still be problematic, particularly for heavily pre-treated patients and patients with significant leukemia burden. Here, we analyzed the feasibility and efficacy in 37 patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) B-ALL who received CAR T-cells derived from related donors. Patients and Methods From April 2017 to May 2020, 37 R/R B-ALL patients with a median age of 19 years (3-61 years), were treated with second-generation CD19 CAR-T cells derived from donors. The data was aggregated from three clinical trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03173417; NCT02546739; and www.chictr.org.cn ChiCTR-ONC-17012829). Of the 37 patients, 28 were relapsed following allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) and whose lymphocytes were collected from their transplant donors (3 HLA matched sibling and 25 haploidentical). For the remaining 9 patients without prior transplant, the lymphocytes were collected from HLA identical sibling donors (n=5) or haploidentical donors (n=4) because CAR-T cells manufacture from patient samples either failed (n=5) or blasts in peripheral blood were too high (>40%) to collect quality T-cells. The median CAR-T cell dose infused was 3×105/kg (1-30×105/kg). Results For the 28 patients who relapsed after prior allo-HSCT, 27 (96.4%) achieved CR within 30 days post CAR T-cell infusion, of which 25 (89.3%) were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative. Within one month following CAR T-cell therapy, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 3 patients including 1 with rash and 2 with diarrhea. A total of 19 of the 28 (67.9%) patients had cytokine release syndrome (CRS), including two patients (7.1%) with Grade 3-4 CRS. Four patients had CAR T-cell related neurotoxicity including 3 with Grade 3-4 events. With a medium follow up of 103 days (1-669days), the median overall survival (OS) was 169 days (1-668 days), and the median leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 158 days (1-438 days). After CAR T-cell therapy, 15 patients bridged into a second allo-HSCT and one of 15 patients (6.7%) relapsed following transplant, and two died from infection. There were 11 patients that did not receive a second transplantation, of which three patients (27.3%) relapsed, and four parents died (one due to relapse, one from arrhythmia and two from GVHD/infection). Two patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining nine patients had no prior transplantation. At the time of T-cell collection, the median bone marrow blasts were 90% (range: 18.5%-98.5%), and the median peripheral blood blasts were 10% (range: 0-70%). CR rate within 30 days post CAR-T was 44.4% (4/9 cases). Six patients developed CRS, including four with Grade 3 CRS. Only one patient had Grade 3 neurotoxicity. No GVHD occurred following CAR T-cell therapy. Among the nine patients, five were treated with CAR T-cells derived from HLA-identical sibling donors and three of those five patients achieved CR. One patient who achieved a CR died from disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) on day 16. Two patients who achieved a CR bridged into allo-HSCT, including one patient who relapsed and died. One of two patients who did not response to CAR T-cell therapy died from leukemia. Four of the nine patients were treated with CAR T-cells derived from haploidentical related donors. One of the four cases achieved a CR but died from infection on day 90. The other three patients who had no response to CAR T-cell therapy died from disease progression within 3 months (7-90 days). Altogether, seven of the nine patients died with a median time of 19 days (7-505 days). Conclusions We find that manufacturing CD19+ CAR-T cells derived from donors is feasible. For patients who relapse following allo-HSCT, the transplant donor derived CAR-T cells are safe and effective with a CR rate as high as 96.4%. If a patient did not have GVHD prior to CAR T-cell therapy, the incidence of GVHD following CAR T-cell was low. Among patients without a history of transplantation, an inability to collect autologous lymphocytes signaled that the patient's condition had already reached a very advanced stage. However, CAR T-cells derived from HLA identical siblings can still be considered in our experience, no GVHD occurred in these patients. But the efficacy of CAR T-cells from haploidentical donors was very poor. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Is Critical to Maintain Remissions after CD19-CAR T-Cell Therapy for Pediatric ALL: A Single Center Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-138528 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 39-40

Author(s):

Aimee C Talleur ◽

Renee M. Madden ◽

Amr Qudeimat ◽

Ewelina Mamcarz ◽

Akshay Sharma ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Cell Therapy ◽

T Cell Therapy ◽

Allogeneic Hct ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T

CD19-CAR T-cell therapy has shown remarkable efficacy in pediatric patients with relapsed and/or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r ALL). Despite high short-term remission rates, many responses are not durable and the best management of patients who achieve a complete response (CR) post-CAR T-cell therapy remains controversial. In particular, it is unclear if these patients should be observed or proceed to consolidative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). To address this question, we reviewed the clinical course of all patients (n=22) who received either an investigational CAR T-cell product (Phase I study: SJCAR19 [NCT03573700]; n=12) or tisagenlecleucel (n=10) at our institution. The investigational CD19-CAR T cells were generated by a standard cGMP-compliant procedure using a lentiviral vector encoding a 2nd generation CD19-CAR with a FMC63-based CD19 binding domain, CD8a stalk and transmembrane domain, and 41BB.ζ signaling domain. Patients received therapy between 8/2018 and 3/2020. All products met manufacturing release specifications. Within the entire cohort, median age at time of infusion was 12.3 years old (range: 1.8-23.5) and median pre-infusion marrow burden using flow-cytometry minimal residual disease (MRD) testing was 6.8% (range: 0.003-100%; 1 patient detectable by next-generation sequencing [NGS] only). All patients received lymphodepleting chemotherapy (fludarabine, 25mg/m2 daily x3, and cyclophosphamide, 900mg/m2 daily x1), followed by a single infusion of CAR T-cells. Phase I product dosing included 1x106 CAR+ T-cells/kg (n=6) or 3x106 CAR+ T-cells/kg (n=6). Therapy was well tolerated, with a low incidence of cytokine release syndrome (any grade: n=10; Grade 3-4: n=4) and neurotoxicity (any grade: n=8; Grade 3-4: n=3). At 4-weeks post-infusion, 15/22 (68.2%) patients achieved a CR in the marrow, of which 13 were MRDneg (MRDneg defined as no detectable leukemia by flow-cytometry, RT-PCR and/or NGS, when available). Among the 2 MRDpos patients, 1 (detectable by NGS only) relapsed 50 days after CAR T-cell infusion and 1 died secondary to invasive fungal infection 35 days after infusion. Within the MRDneg cohort, 6/13 patients proceeded to allogeneic HCT while in MRDneg/CR (time to HCT, range: 1.8-2.9 months post-CAR T-cell infusion). All 6 HCT recipients remain in remission with a median length of follow-up post-HCT of 238.5 days (range 19-441). In contrast, only 1 (14.3%) patient out of 7 MRDneg/CR patients who did not receive allogeneic HCT, remains in remission with a follow up of greater 1 year post-CAR T-cell infusion (HCT vs. no HCT: p<0.01). The remaining 6 patients developed recurrent detectable leukemia within 2 to 9 months post-CAR T-cell infusion (1 patient detectable by NGS only). Notably, recurring leukemia remained CD19+ in 4 of 5 evaluable patients. All 4 patients with CD19+ relapse received a 2nd CAR T-cell infusion (one in combination with pembrolizumab) and 2 achieved MRDneg/CR. There were no significant differences in outcome between SJCAR19 study participants and patients who received tisagenlecleucel. With a median follow up of one year, the 12 month event free survival (EFS) of all 22 patients is 25% (median EFS: 3.5 months) and the 12 month overall survival (OS) 70% (median OS not yet reached). In conclusion, infusion of investigational and FDA-approved autologous CD19-CAR T cells induced high CR rates in pediatric patients with r/r ALL. However, our current experience shows that sustained remission without consolidative allogeneic HCT is not seen in most patients. Our single center experience highlights not only the need to explore maintenance therapies other than HCT for MRDneg/CR patients, but also the need to improve the in vivo persistence of currently available CD19-CAR T-cell products. Disclosures Sharma: Spotlight Therapeutics: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Other: Research Collaboration; CRISPR Therapeutics, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Novartis: Other: Clinical Trial PI. Velasquez:St. Jude: Patents & Royalties; Rally! Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gottschalk:Patents and patent applications in the fields of T-cell & Gene therapy for cancer: Patents & Royalties; TESSA Therapeutics: Other: research collaboration; Inmatics and Tidal: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck and ViraCyte: Consultancy.

Download Full-text