Predictive Factors of Overall Survival in Patients with Relapsed AL Amyloidosis Treated with Single Agent Daratumumab

Abstract Background: Two prospective phase II studies evaluated the efficacy of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody Daratumumab as a single agent (sDARA) in patients with relapsed AL amyloidosis and reported impressive hematologic and organ response rates. However, both studies included small number of patients and in one study sDARA was administered for 6 cycles (n=40) while in the other study, it was administered until hematologic progression, toxicity or for up to 24 months (n=22). Furthermore, predictive factors associated with hematologic and organ responses, and optimal duration of therapy remain unclear. Methods: We retrospectively studied the clinical and biological characteristics of patients with AL amyloidosis treated with sDARA, between April 2017 and December 2020, to identify factors associated with hematologic and organ response rates and impact on progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Criteria for hematologic and organ response were defined according to the consensus criteria of ISA. Major organ deterioration progression-free survival (MOD-PFS) was used as a composite of endpoints from the time between sDARA initiation and whichever of the following occurred first: death, development of end stage cardiac or renal failure, or hematologic progression. OS was defined as the length of time between initiation of sDARA and the date of death or last follow-up. To account for immortal time bias, a landmark analysis for MOD-PFS and OS starting at the 12-month mark was performed to evaluate the impact of treatment duration on outcomes. Results: Eighty six patients with AL amyloidosis received sDARA. The median age was 67 years (range, 39-86) and 65% were male, 75% with lambda AL amyloidosis. Of the 86 patients, 38% had t(11;14) and 11% had 1q gain. At time of sDARA initiation, 35% of patients had >2 organs involved, including 22% with BU stage III (14% IIIa and 8% IIIb) and 13% with renal stage III disease. Majority (44%) of the patients received sDara as 2 nd line therapy, but 2% received as frontline, 21% as 3 rd line and 33% as 4 th line or more. Half of the patients (45%) were previously treated with HDM/SCT and 87% with proteasome inhibitor based regimen. Patients received a median of 12 cycles of sDARA (range 1-36) with a median follow-up time of 21.6 months (range 1.2-48.3). Hematologic CR and VGPR were achieved by 44% and 37% of patients, respectively and significantly associated with prolonged MOD-PFS and OS (Figure A and B). The median time to cardiac and renal responses were 6.8 months (range 0.9-12) and 6.7 months (range 1.8-42), respectively. At 12 months, cardiac and renal responses were observed in 47% and 61%, respectively and correlated with depth of hematologic response. The median OS and MOD-PFS were not reached (95% CI 40-NR) and 36 months (95% CI 28-NR), respectively. Achievement of cardiac response was associated with improved MOD-PFS (42 vs. 25 months; HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.78; p=0.01) and OS (NR vs 26 months; HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.04-0.89; p=0.02) and achievement of renal response was associated with improved MOD-PFS (NR vs. 13 months; HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.20; p<0.0001) and OS (NR vs. 25 months; HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.65; p=0.004). Importantly, presence of t(11;14) and number of previous lines of therapy did not impact MOD-PFS and OS. On an univariate analysis, several variables including dFLC >180 mg/L, bone marrow infiltration >10%, 24h proteinuria >3.5 g and NTproBNP >8500 pg/mL were significantly associated with lower MOD-PFS and OS, but only achievement of VGPR or CR and presence of 1q Gain were independently associated with MOD-PFS and OS (Figure C and D) on a multivariate analysis. Finally, on a landmark analysis, patients who received >12 cycles vs <12 cycles had significantly longer MOD-PFS (30 vs. 13 months; HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31-0.72; p=0.0018)) and OS (NR vs. 15 months; HR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.37; p<0.0001). Conclusion: sDARA confers very high rates of hematologic responses (81% of patients achieving >VGPR) in patients with relapsed AL amyloidosis and leads to prolonged OS and MOD-PFS, which is independent of the number of previous lines of treatment. Our data confirmed that achievement of hematologic response is a major predictor of OS and MOD-PFS in AL amyloidosis, and revealed that presence of 1q Gain is associated with lower response rate to sDARA. Longer duration of therapy (>12 cycles) with sDARA was associated with prolonged MOD-PFS and OS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sloan: Stemline: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacosmos: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sanchorawala: Karyopharm: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Regeneron: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Proclara: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Caleum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sorrento: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Belantamab Mafadotin in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory AL Amyloidosis with Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-151365 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1670-1670

Author(s):

Yifei Zhang ◽

Amandeep Godara ◽

Stacey Pan ◽

Denis Toskic ◽

Teresa Fogaren ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Response Rates ◽

Cardiac Response ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Renal Response

Abstract Introduction: Daratumumab in combination with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (Dara/CyBorD) is the only FDA approved therapy for newly diagnosed systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis (N Engl J Med 2021;385:46). Belantamab mafodotin is a novel anti-BCMA immunoconjugate with humanized IgG1 anti-BCMA monoclonal antibody conjugated to a microtubule-disrupting agent, monomehtyl auristatin F (MMAF) via a non-cleavable linker (Blood 2014;123:3128). Phase I/II studies in heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma patients showed single agent clinical activity with overall response rates ranging from 30-60%, with majority of responses being durable at 13 months of follow-up. Toxicity profile included keratopathy, thrombocytopenia and anemia (Blood Cancer J 2019;9:37; Lancet Oncol 2020;21:207). Based on these results, belantamab mafadotin (BLM; Blenrep) was FDA approved for relapsed myeloma. A role for new agents such as BLM in AL has not been previously reported. Here we report outcomes of six patients who received BLM at different centers for relapsed refractory (RR) AL associated with myeloma. Methods: In this retrospective study we identified AL patients with RR disease who received at least one dose of BLM. In a multi-institutional collaboration we collected demographic, medical history, laboratory, pathologic and treatment/response data on patients with myeloma and biopsy-proven AL who had received BLM. Laboratory assessment including evaluations for hematologic and organ response was done as per standard criteria and toxicity assessed as per CTCAE v6.0. Results: We identified 6 patients, 3M/3F, from 4 centers; baseline characteristics and treatment data are provided in Table 1. Baseline median age was 61 years (range, 51-74) and median marrow plasmacytosis and iFLC were 40% (10-90) and 868mg/L (145-5324). Four patients had AL λ-type and 2 κ-type, and 5 of 6 had cardiac involvement while 3 had additional organ involvement (renal, GI, nervous system). Prior to initiating BLM the median number of lines of prior therapy was 6 (range, 5-10), including daratumumab, bortezomib and lenalidomide, and prior to initiating BLM marrow assessment showed a median plasmacytosis of 23%. BLM at 2.5 mg/kg was given as an intravenous infusion over the course of 30 minutes every three weeks after ophthalmologic exam clearance until discontinuation for progression or toxicity. At a median follow-up of 4.5 months, 5 patients (83%) achieved hematological responses (HR) with 3 (50%) achieving complete hematological responses (CR) by standard criteria (J Clin Oncol 2012;30:4541). Time to HR ranged from 3 to 150 days. Cardiac response was seen in all but 1 patient, with time to response ranging from 11 to 96 days. One patient had a renal response; response assessment is not yet available for 2 other patients with renal involvement. The most common toxicity was keratopathy (grade 1-2). BLM was held after the first dose in one patient who had been heavily pre-treated and had extensive cardiac and pulmonary AL and multiple sites of FDG-avid progressive myeloma bone disease. Two days after administration of the first dose of BLM, this 51-year-old man was admitted to hospital for dyspnea, developed atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia, and briefly required cardiac resuscitation without intubation with return of spontaneous circulation after 6 minutes. This patient achieved a CR after one dose of BLM that has been stable for over 5 months with marked clinical improvement. A 62 year-old woman with cardiac and renal AL has achieved a CR durable for over 16 months with cardiac and renal responses. Conclusions: In this group of 6 patients with RR AL with myeloma, HR and cardiac response rates were impressive at 83% and 80%, respectively. One patient who had 24-hour urine protein evaluation also achieved a renal response. Time to response was rapid with 2 patients achieving HR within a week of starting treatment, and the rest within five months. Additionally, 3 of 6 patients achieved CR, 1 had no clonal plasma cells in the marrow and another clonal disease detectable only by MRD. In this retrospective multi-institutional cohort BLM resulted in rapid reduction of iFLC and induced critical organ responses. These data provide preliminary evidence for the clinical activity of BLM in RR AL. Results of the on-going phase 2 clinical trial in the European Myeloma Network (EMN27; NCT04617925) are awaited with great interest. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Sborov: Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; SkylineDx: Consultancy. Comenzo: Karyopharm: Research Funding; Prothena Biosciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Unum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Caelum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Patents & Royalties: WO2016187546A1, Research Funding. Kansagra: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cota Health: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alynylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Updated Efficacy Including Genetic and Clinical Subgroup Analysis and Overall Safety in the Phase 3 RESONATETM Trial of Ibrutinib Versus Ofatumumab in Previously Treated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.3331.3331 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 3331-3331 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Jennifer R. Brown ◽

Peter Hillmen ◽

Susan O'Brien ◽

Jaqueline C. Barrientos ◽

Nishitha Reddy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Interim Analysis ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Prior Therapy

Abstract Introduction: The role of various prognostic factors in CLL/SLL is not yet fully understood, including the implications of new genetic markers associated with high risk. Ibrutinib (Imbruvica®), a first-in-class Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a once-daily single agent approved by the US FDA for CLL patients (pts) who have received ≥ 1 prior therapy, and for pts with 17p deletion CLL. We report updated efficacy results for the phase 3 RESONATETM(PCYC-1112) study of ibrutinib (ibr) vs ofatumumab (ofa), relative to genetic features and prior treatment exposure, and provide updated adverse event (AE) data. Methods: Pts received 420 mg oral ibr daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or IV ofa for up to 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was IRC-assessed PFS with secondary endpoints OS and IRC ORR (Byrd et al, NEJM 2014). At interim analysis, with median follow-up of 9.4 months, the Independent Data Monitoring Committee recommended pts in the ofa arm be provided access to ibr. Additional endpoints including investigator-assessed efficacy, investigation of potential predictive biomarkers, and safety with longer follow-up are reported. Results: The 391 pts were randomized to ibr (n=195) or ofa (n=196). Median age was 67 years, with 40% ≥70 years, 57% Rai stage III/IV disease. Median number of prior therapies was 3 (ibr) vs 2 (ofa) with 23% having 1, 28% with 2, and 49% ≥ 3 prior therapies. Approximately 32% had del(17p) and 32% (122/381) del(11q). 72 of 300 pts had complex cytogenetics (≥3 abnormalities) and 68% (181/266) unmutated IGHV. With outcome analyses pending, preliminary analysis revealed that 19% of pts had NOTCH1, 23% SF3B1, 36% TP53, and 1% MYD88 gene mutations at baseline. With median follow-up of 16 months, investigator-assessed PFS was significantly longer for ibr vs ofa (median NR vs 8.1 months, [HR 0.106, 95%CI 0.073-0.153, P<0.0001]) (figure). OS was significantly better for ibr vs ofa, with 18-month OS rates of 85% and 78% respectively, despite 120 pts (61%) randomized to ofa who crossed over to ibr and were censored at that time. Higher number of prior therapies (≥3) and 11q deletion were associated with significantly lower 12-month PFS rate for ofa (P=0.001) but not for ibr (P=0.14) and (P=0.13), respectively. The best ORR as assessed by investigator for ibr vs ofa was 90% vs 25% (P<0.0001), including 8% of pts on ibr achieving PR with lymphocytosis and 6% with CR/CRi. Compared with ofa, ibr improved 12-month PFS (table) and ORR regardless of baseline genetics, complex cytogenetics, or number of prior therapies (P<0.001 for ibr vs ofa for all comparisons). Of pts receiving ibr, those who received only 1 prior therapy had better efficacy outcomes than those who received ibr in later lines (12-month PFS of 94% vs 82% [P=0.01]); responses were achieved in 100% vs 88% (P=0.04), of these pts, respectively. No significant difference in 12-month PFS was observed in ibr-treated patients with or without del(17p) or for those who developed lymphocytosis compared to those without lymphocytosis. Median treatment duration was longer for ibr vs ofa (16 vs 5 months). The most common cumulative AEs for ibr, displayed here by maximum grade, were consistent with those reported at interim analysis including diarrhea (37% grade [G]1, 10% G2, 4% G3), fatigue (18% G1, 12% G2, 3% G3), and nausea (24% G1, 6% G2, 2% G3). The most frequent grade 3/4 AEs for ibr included neutropenia (18%), pneumonia (9%), thrombocytopenia (6%), anemia (6%) and hypertension (6%). Atrial fibrillation of any grade occurred in 7% of ibr-treated pts. 47 pts (24%) discontinued ibr; 17 (9%) for progressive disease, 13 (7%) for AEs, 10 (5%) deaths, 3 (2%) pt decision, including 2 pts going to commercial ibr, and 4 (2%) investigator decision, including 1 (1%) for SCT. 76% of pts randomized to ibr continue treatment on study. Conclusions: Ibr significantly improved investigator-assessed PFS, OS, and ORR relative to ofa in pts with CLL/SLL who had received ≥ 1 prior therapy. The updated results are consistent with previously published phase 2 single-agent results (Byrd et al. NEJM 2013). Pts in the ibr arm treated in the second line experienced better outcomes than those salvaged in later lines of therapy. These results provide further evidence of ibrutinib’s robust clinical activity in CLL pts regardless of high-risk baseline genetics or number of prior therapies. Figure 1 Progression-Free Survival Figure 1. Progression-Free Survival Table. Investigator-assessed Efficacy Outcomes Table. Investigator-assessed Efficacy Outcomes Disclosures Brown: Sanofi, Onyx, Vertex, Novartis, Boehringer, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Emergent, Morphosys, Celgene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Gilead: Consultancy. Hillmen:Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Gilead, Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. O'Brien:Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Barrientos:Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Coutre:Janssen, Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tam:Pharmacyclics and Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mulligan:Roche, Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jaeger:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Barr:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Furman:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Kipps:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Cymbalista:Janssen, Roche, GSK, Gilead, Mundipharma: Honoraria. Delgado:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Montillo:Janssen: Honoraria. Burger:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Chung:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Lin:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Gau:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Chang:Pharmacyclics: Employment. McGreivy:Pharmacyclics: Employment. James:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Byrd:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Five-Year Experience with Single-Agent Ibrutinib in Patients with Previously Untreated and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.233.233 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 233-233 ◽

Cited By ~ 53

Author(s):

Susan M. O'Brien ◽

Richard R. Furman ◽

Steven E. Coutre ◽

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Jan Burger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Over Time

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib (ibr), a first-in-class, once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved by the US FDA for treatment of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) including pts with del17p. The phase 1b/2 PCYC-1102 trial showed single-agent efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naïve (TN; O'Brien, Lancet Oncol 2014) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL (Byrd, N Engl J Med 2013). We report efficacy and safety results of the longest follow-up to date for ibr-treated pts. Methods: Pts received 420 or 840 mg ibr QD until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Overall response rate (ORR) including partial response (PR) with lymphocytosis (PR-L) was assessed using updated iwCLL criteria. Responses were assessed by risk groups: unmutated IGVH, complex karyotype (CK; ≥3 unrelated chromosomal abnormalities by stimulated cytogenetics assessed by a reference lab), and in hierarchical order for del17p, then del11q. In the long-term extension study PCYC-1103, grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs requiring dose reduction or discontinuation were collected. Results: Median age of the 132 pts with CLL/SLL (31 TN, 101 R/R) was 68 y (range, 37-84) with 43% ≥70 y. Baseline CK was observed in 41/112 (37%) of pts. Among R/R pts, 34 (34%) had del17p, 35 (35%) del11q, and 79 (78%) unmutated IGVH. R/R pts had a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1-12). Median time on study was 46 m (range, 0-67) for all-treated pts, 60 m (range, 0-67.4) for TN pts, and 39 m (range, 0-67) for R/R pts. The ORR (per investigator) was 86% (complete response [CR], 14%) for all-treated pts (TN: 84% [CR, 29%], R/R: 86% [CR, 10%]). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) for TN and 52 m for R/R pts with 60 m estimated PFS rates of 92% and 43%, respectively (Figure 1). In R/R pts, median PFS was 55 m (95% confidence intervals [CI], 31-not estimable [NE]) for pts with del11q, 26 m (95% CI,18-37) for pts with del17p, and NR (95% CI, 40-NE) for pts without del17p, del11q, trisomy 12, or del13q. Median PFS was 33 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and NR for pts with and without CK, and 43 m (95% CI, 32-NE) and 63 m (95% CI, 7-NE) for pts with unmutated and mutated IGVH, respectively(Figure 2). Among R/R pts, median PFS was 63 m (95% CI, 37-NE) for pts with 1-2 prior regimens (n=27, 3 pts with 1 prior therapy) and 59 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and 39 m (95% CI, 26-NE) for pts with 3 and ≥4 prior regimens, respectively. Median duration of response was NR for TN pts and 45 m for R/R pts. Pts estimated to be alive at 60 m were: TN, 92%; all R/R, 57%; R/R del17p, 32%; R/R del 11q, 61%; R/R unmutated IGVH, 55%. Among all treated pts, onset of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs was highest in the first year and decreased during subsequent years. With about 5 years of follow-up, the most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were hypertension (26%), pneumonia (22%), neutropenia (17%), and atrial fibrillation (9%). Study treatment was discontinued due to AEs in 27 pts (20%) and disease progression in 34 pts (26%). Of all treated pts, 38% remain on ibr treatment on study including 65% of TN pts and 30% of R/R pts. Conclusions: Single-agent ibrutinib continues to show durable responses in pts with TN or R/R CLL/SLL including those with del17p, del11q, or unmutated IGVH. With extended treatment, CRs were observed in 29% of TN and 10% of R/R pts, having evolved over time. Ibrutinib provided better PFS outcomes if administered earlier in therapy than in the third-line or beyond. Those without CK experienced more favorable PFS and OS than those with CK. Ibrutinib was well tolerated with the onset of AEs decreasing over time, allowing for extended dosing for 65% of TN and 30% of R/R pts who continue treatment. Disclosures O'Brien: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Furman:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Coutre:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Burger:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Sharman:Gilead: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Wierda:Abbvie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Jones:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Luan:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. James:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Chu:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Venetoclax-Based Treatment in Elderly CLL Patients: A Retrospective Study from the Filo Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-149640 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3747-3747

Author(s):

Charlotte Doublet ◽

Marie-Sarah Dilhuydy ◽

Emmanuelle Ferrant ◽

Pierre Feugier ◽

Alexandra Fayault ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Retrospective Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Oncology Nurses ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Daily Dose ◽

History Of

Abstract Median age at diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia is 72 years. However, only few patients over 80 years of age are included in clinical trials, even in those devoted to unfit patients. In order to evaluate both efficiency and safety of venetoclax in this category of patients, we conducted a multicentric retrospective study and collected data from 77 CLL patients from 19 FILO centers who started venetoclax after 80 years of age. Median age at venetoclax initiation was 86 years old (81-97). 63% of patients had a history of heart disease, 62% had renal failure (moderate 59% and severe 3%) and 29% had a history of severe infections. Despite their comorbidities and a CIRS greater than 6 in 70% of cases, their autonomy was preserved with a median performans status of 1 (0-4). In this comorbid geriatric population, pretherapeutic geriatric assessment was only performed in a single patient. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (0-6) with an exposure to a BCR inhibitor in 56% of cases. 11q and 17p deletion were found in 39% and 30% of cases respectively, 39% of patients had a complex karyotype and 30% harbored a TP53 mutation. However, in this real life population, these prognostic factors were only performed in half of patients. IGHV mutational status was only available in 11 patients, and 83% of them had unmutated IGHV. At the time of venetoclax initiation, the tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) risk was moderate in 57% of cases and high in 8% of cases. Venetoclax was administered as a single agent (42%) or in association with rituximab (58%). In total, half of the patients were hospitalized at each dose ramp-up, and only 3 patients were treated on outpatient basis. 82% of the cohort was able to reach the daily dose of 400mg. Half of the patients were included in a phone call monitoring program with oncology nurses to pre-emptively manage side effects and foster therapy adherence. The safety study reported 14% of TLS, with 2 discontinuations of treatment within the first month: one of which led to dialysis and the other to death. As in the previously published studies, 25% of patients had infectious complications, and grade 3 haematological and digestive toxicities were reported in 42% and 22% of cases, respectively. The reduction of the daily dose of venetoclax was necessary for 33%. Permanent discontinuation of venetoclax occurred in 40% of subjects, including 29% of early withdrawal (within the first 3 months). Main reasons for discontinuation were intolerance (21%), CLL progression (21%), death (21%) and scheduled treatment discontinuation (10%). The overall response rate was 86%, consisting of 49% of complete response (unconfirmed by bone marrow biopsy) and 37% of partial response. With a median follow-up of 21months, estimated progression free survival and overall survival were 29 and 38 months respectively. Prior exposure to a BCR inhibitor had no impact on progression free survival. To conclude, venetoclax has a manageable safety profile in elderly patients with comorbidities and can induce prolonged responses. Finally, if additional follow-up by oncology nurses seems to be more and more implemented, the pre-therapeutic onco-geriatric evaluation remains underexploited in this population. Disclosures Ferrant: AstraZeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Janssen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Feugier: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Laribi: AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding. Tchernonog: JANSSEN: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; ASTRAZENECA: Consultancy. Dartigeas: Astra-Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel grants/Congress. Quinquenel: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Optimal Therapy for Relapsed AL Amyloidosis Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125453 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3171-3171

Author(s):

M Hasib Sidiqi ◽

Abdullah S. S. Al Saleh ◽

Iuliana Vaxman ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Francis K. Buadi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Treatment Regimens ◽

2Nd Generation

Introduction: There is a paucity of randomized trials to guide therapy for relapsed AL amyloidosis with treatment regimens generally extrapolated from experience in multiple myeloma. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who relapsed after receiving autologous stem cell transplant at Mayo Clinic. Patients treated for first relapse between January 2004 and December 2018 were included. Results: Three hundred and twenty-one patients were seen for relapsed AL amyloidosis post ASCT during the study period. Baseline characteristics were typical for a cohort with AL amyloidosis and are listed in Table1. 39% received therapy prior to transplant, conditioning in the majority (75%) was melphalan 200mg/m2. The median progression free survival from transplant (PFS1) was 30.7 months. Of the 321 patients 294 received treatment for relapsed disease. We categorized treatment regimens according to commonly used combinations and drug classes to further analyze outcomes. 34 patients were excluded from this analysis as they either proceeded directly to second ASCT (n=10) or received an atypical regimen not commonly considered for AL amyloidosis (n=24). Five categories of therapy regimens were identified, thalidomide based (n=110), melphalan plus steroids (n=31), 2nd generation immunomodulatory (IMiD) drug +/- alkylator (n=76), proteasome inhibitor (PI) +/- alkylator (n=116), PI plus IMiD (n=16), or daratumumab based (n=9). Disease and treatment characteristics for patients treated with these regimens are listed in Table 2. Patients treated with thalidomide had the shortest PFS1 (17.7 months) but PFS1 was similar for those treated with melphalan plus steroids, PI+IMiD and 2nd generation IMiDs (25.5, 24.3 and 25.6 months respectively). Patients treated with a PI +/- alkylator and daratumumab based regimen had the longest PFS1 (36.7 and 41.9 months respectively). The median duration of therapy was longer in patients treated with a 2nd generation IMiD or daratumumab based regimen (10.2, 12, 6.1, 5.5, 6.2 and 5.9 months for Dara based, 2nd generation IMiD, PI+/- alkylator, PI+IMiD, melphalan plus steroids and thalidomide based respectively). Hematologic response rate was lowest in those treated with melphalan plus steroids or thalidomide based regimens (44% and 55% respectively) and highest for patients treated with a PI+/- alkylator, (Figure 1). Progression free survival from relapsed therapy (PFS2) was longest amongst patients treated with daratumumab based regimens, PI +/- alkylator and 2nd generation IMiDs (not reached, 29.9 and 26.7 months respectively), Figure 2A. Overall survival from time of relapsed therapy favored patients treated with daratumumab based regimens, 2nd generation IMiDs and PI +/- alkylator, Figure 2b). Conclusion: A second generation IMiD based regimen or PI +/- alkylator produce high response rates and prolonged progression free and overall survival for relapsed AL amyloidosis. Patients treated with daratumumab based regimens and those treated with a PI plus IMiD also appear to do well, although numbers were low in our study. Patients treated with melphalan plus steroids or thalidomide based combinations have inferior outcomes and these regimens should be avoided. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Akcea: Consultancy; Alnylam: Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Dingli:Karyopharm: Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; alexion: Consultancy. Leung:Takeda: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aduro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Research Funding. Kapoor:Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Cellectar: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Kumar:Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gertz:Medscape: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Prothena Biosciences Inc: Consultancy; Ionis/Akcea: Consultancy; Alnylam: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Appellis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Abbvie: Other: personal fees for Data Safety Monitoring board; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Teva: Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Speakers Bureau; DAVA oncology: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Proclara: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; i3Health: Other: Development of educational programs and materials; Springer Publishing: Patents & Royalties; Amyloidosis Foundation: Research Funding; International Waldenstrom Foundation: Research Funding; Annexon: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Daratumumab off label use for AL amyloidosis.

Download Full-text

Optimizing Deep Response Assessment for AL Amyloidosis Using Involved Free Light Chain Level at End of Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-113958 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3227-3227

Author(s):

Eli Muchtar ◽

Angela Dispenzieri ◽

Nelson Leung ◽

Francis K. Buadi ◽

David Dingli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Light Chain ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Organ Response

Abstract Introduction: Light chain burden in light chain (AL) amyloidosis is often low, making accurate response assessment challenging. Methods: AL amyloidosis patients achieving very good partial or complete response to first line therapy and had serial sFLC studies during and after completion of therapy were included (n=396). Involved free light chain (iFLC), difference in involved-to-uninvolved free light chains (dFLC) and sFLC ratio (sFLCR) were assessed at the end of first line therapy and at nadir iFLC. Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hematological progression-free survival (hemPFS) was defined as the time from diagnosis until hematological progression or death, where patients known to be alive and progression-free at the end of follow-up were censored. Hematological progression was defined according to consensus criteria or upon initiation of second line therapy, whichever came first. Results: The median iFLC and dFLC at the end of therapy was 1.7 mg/dL and 0.5 mg/dL, respectively. sFLCR normalization occurred in 70% of patients. iFLC ≤2 mg/dL and dFLC ≤0.5 mg/dL were associated with a longer hemPFS compared to their counterparts (Figure). Only iFLC ≤2 mg/dL was associated with a significantly longer overall survival (Figure). sFLCR normalization did not predict hemPFS or overall survival. Organ response was predicted by iFLC ≤2 mg/dL and dFLC ≤0.5 mg/dL (Table), with best discrimination seen with iFLC ≤2 mg/dL. Organ response was not predicted by sFLC normalization (Table). The median nadir iFLC was 1.4 mg/dL and was reached 3.9 months from the end of therapy, longer in transplanted patients compared to patients treated with non-transplant regimens (7.3 vs 1.8 months, respectively; P<0.001). iFLC ≤2 mg/dL at the completion of therapy and nadir iFLC reached >12 months from the end of therapy were favorable predictors of hemPFS/OS in a multivariate analysis. Conclusion: iFLC at the end of first line therapy better predicts for organ response and survival than dFLC among deep responders. Normalization of sFLCR does not predict for organ response or survival and should not be used as measure of therapeutic efficacy. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Dispenzieri: Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Dingli:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding. Kapoor:Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Russell:Vyriad: Equity Ownership. Kumar:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Gertz:Alnylam: Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy; Ionis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; annexon: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy; spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Prothena: Honoraria; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Updated Organ Response Results of an Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Cael-101 in Patients with AL Amyloidosis Receiving Anti-Plasma Cell Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148905 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2724-2724

Author(s):

Jason Valent ◽

John Silowsky ◽

Michael R. Kurman ◽

Eileen Daniel ◽

Janet Jobes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Stage Iiia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Amyloid Deposits ◽

Response Range ◽

Organ Response ◽

Al Amyloid

Abstract Background: CAEL-101 is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody intended to enable immune clearance of AL amyloid deposits. This study (NCT04304144) data allowed dose selection of CAEL-101 for the ongoing Phase 3 studies in patients with Mayo stage IIIa and IIIb AL amyloidosis cardiomyopathy newly diagnosed and treated with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) alone or in combination with daratumumab. Methods: 13 patients were treated with CAEL-101 and CyBorD and an additional 5 patients were treated with CAEL-101, daratumumab, and CyBorD. Organ response data on assessable patients were evaluated per consensus criteria as per institutional standard of care. Safety, pharmacokinetic and anti-drug antibody data will be reported separately. Results: The follow up for patients receiving CAEL-101 and CyBorD is 12 to 15 months and for the CAEL-101, Daratumumab, and CyBorD is 4 to 6 months. 16 of 18 patients remain on treatment. One discontinuation was due to death from E. coli sepsis and the other due to lack of hematologic response with deterioration of heart function requiring heart transplant after only 6 doses of CAEL-101. Organ response in cardiac patients by NT pro BNP criteria occurred in 4 of 8 evaluable patients treated with CAEL-101 and CyBorD (time to organ response range 2 - 12 months) and in 2 of 3 patients treated with CAEL-101, daratumumab, and CyBorD (time to organ response range 3 - 5 months). Four patients have had repeat echocardiogram 1 year from start of CAEL-101 based therapy with interpretable global peak longitudinal strain (GLS). The GLS improved in 2 patients by -5% (-6.4% to -11.4%) and -5.1% (-12.8% to -17.9%). GLS remained stable in the other 2 patients. All 9 patients with evaluable kidney involvement by 24 hour urine protein achieved an organ response. Responses occurred in as little as 2 months in 5 patients (range 2 - 7 months). The time to organ response were similar in the daratumumab and non-daratumumab treated patients. One patient with hematologic stable disease and persistent 71% improvement in 24 hour urine protein at 10 months from start of CAEL-101 based therapy is most notable. Conclusions: CAEL-101 with anti-plasma cell therapy remains reasonably well tolerated with no unanticipated adverse effects. Organ responses, most notably renal response, have occurred early in the course of therapy and appears to be durable. Organ responses in some patients have also improved over time with some significant improvement in patient GLS evaluations by echocardiogram. These results encourage clinical trial participation in the ongoing CAEL-101 clinical trials in Mayo stage IIIa and IIIb AL amyloidosis patients. Disclosures Valent: Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Caelum Biosciences: Other: Clinical Trial Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Silowsky: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Kurman: Caelum Biosciences: Other: Medical Monitor. Daniel: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Jobes: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Harnett: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Spector: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Anwer: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS / Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Zonder: BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Caelum Biosciences: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Consultancy. Liedtke: Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical Trial Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sobolov: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. OffLabel Disclosure: CAEL-101 is a monoclonal antibody directed at AL amyloid deposits. The purpose is to promote immune clearance of amyloid deposits.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Alone for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Among Patients with 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Based on Previous Treatment Exposure: Updated Analysis of Pollux

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.489.489 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 489-489 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Philippe Moreau ◽

Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽

Heather J. Sutherland ◽

Marc Lalancette ◽

Hila Magen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Previous Treatment ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Introduction: Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 IgGκ monoclonal antibody that has been combined successfully with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. The combination of daratumumab with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) has been compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (Rd) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in a randomized phase 3 study (Dimopoulos MA, et al. N Engl J Med 2016; in press). In a pre-specified interim analysis, the DRd combination demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) in addition to deep and durable responses compared with the Rd arm. We performed subgroup analyses to further examine these efficacy data according to prior treatment exposure. Methods: Pts who received ≥1 prior line of therapy were randomized (1:1) to Rd (lenalidomide: 25 mg PO on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle; dexamethasone: 40 mg PO weekly) with or without daratumumab (16 mg/kg IV qw for 8 weeks, q2w for 16 weeks, then q4w until progression). The primary endpoint was PFS. Pts who were refractory to lenalidomide were not eligible. All analyses were performed in pts who received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy. Results: Median follow-up was 13.5 months. Pts who were lenalidomide-naive prior to the start of study treatment (DRd, n=226; Rd, n=219) demonstrated significantly longer PFS with DRd vs Rd (median: not reached [NR] vs 18.4 months; HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.52; P<0.0001), with estimated 12-month PFS rates of 83.0% vs 59.9%, respectively. ORR was significantly higher with DRd vs Rd (96% vs 79%), with ≥VGPR rates of 76% vs 47% and ≥CR rates of 44% vs 21%, respectively (P<0.0001 for all). In the lenalidomide-exposed subgroup (DRd, n=46; Rd, n=45), median PFS was NR in both treatment groups (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.22-1.12; P=0.0826); estimated 12-month PFS rates were 84.1% vs 63.1%, respectively. ORR was higher with DRd vs Rd but did not reach statistical significance (87% vs 71%; P=0.0729); however, rates of ≥VGPR (78% vs 38%; P=0.0001) and ≥CR (44% vs 12%; P=0.0011) were significantly improved with DRd vs Rd, respectively. For bortezomib-naive pts (DRd, n=44; Rd, n=45), PFS was significantly longer with DRd vs Rd (median: NR vs 15.8 months; HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.86; P=0.0170), with estimated 12-month PFS rates of 85.4% vs 69.2%, respectively. ORR was significantly higher with DRd vs Rd (98% vs 82%; P=0.0158), with trends toward increased rates of ≥VGPR (74% vs 55%; P=0.0544) and ≥CR (42% vs 23%; P=0.0576). In the bortezomib-exposed pts (DRd, n=228; Rd, n=219), median PFS was NR in DRd vs 18.4 months in Rd (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.50 P<0.0001); estimated 12-month PFS rates were 82.8% vs 58.7%, respectively. Significant differences in ORR (93% vs 77%), rate of ≥VGPR (77% vs 43%) and rate of ≥CR (44% vs 19%) were observed with DRd vs Rd, respectively (P<0.0001 for all). Among bortezomib-refractory patients (DRd, n=54; Rd, n=49), the PFS benefit of DRd compared with Rd was maintained (median: NR vs 10.3 mo, respectively; HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.85; P=0.0117; Figure). The estimated 12-month PFS rates were 70.8% vs 44.4%, respectively. Similar to bortezomib-exposed pts, ORR (92% vs 68%; P=0.0024), rate of ≥VGPR (75% vs 36%; P=0.0001), and rate of ≥CR (46% vs 13%; P=0.0003) were all significantly higher with DRd vs Rd for bortezomib-refractory pts. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Among pts who received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy, significantly longer PFS and higher ORR were observed with DRd vs Rd among pts who previously received bortezomib or were refractory to bortezomib or were lenalidomide-naive. Higher rates of deeper responses were observed in pts who previously received lenalidomide or bortezomib. Follow-up is ongoing to assess PFS in pts who received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy and previously received lenalidomide. These results further strengthen the significant benefit of combining daratumumab with Rd for RRMM. Figure Progression-free Survival in Bortezomib-refractory Patients who Received 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Figure. Progression-free Survival in Bortezomib-refractory Patients who Received 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Disclosures Moreau: Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Kaufman:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sutherland:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lalancette:Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Iida:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Prince:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Cochrane:BMS: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings; Novartis: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings; Celgene: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings; Takeda: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings. Khokhar:Janssen: Employment. Guckert:Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership; Janssen: Employment. Qin:Janssen: Employment. Oriol:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Final Results of a Phase 2 Study of Bendamustine in Combination with Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously Treated Systemic Light-Chain (AL) Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4523.4523 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4523-4523

Author(s):

Galina Grigoriev Lagos ◽

Suzanne Lentzsch ◽

Raymond L. Comenzo ◽

Jeffrey Zonder ◽

Keren Osman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rate ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Event Free Survival ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Hematologic Response ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Organ Response

Abstract Background: No established therapies exist for patients who fail or relapse after initial therapy for AL amyloidosis. Bendamustine has shown potential in treating multiple myeloma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkins lymphoma but it has not been well studied in AL amyloidosis. We sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of using Bendamustine in combination with dexamethasone (Ben/Dex) in patients with relapsed AL amyloidosis in a multi-center phase 2 study and present the results of the final analysis. Methods: This Phase IIa clinical trial enrolled 31 patients who had persistent or progressive AL amyloidosis after at least 1 prior therapy. An optimal two-stage Simon design approach was used. Of 13 patients initially enrolled, 3 experienced hematologic partial response (PR), and an additional 16 were treated in the second stage. It was pre-determined that if 9 or more of the 29 patients with evaluable response had hematologic PR or better the treatment would be considered worthy of further development. Evaluable response was defined as patients who completed at least 2 treatment cycles. The primary objective was to determine the rate of partial hematologic response (PR). Secondary objectives included the overall hematologic response rate, organ response rate, toxicity profile, event free survival, and overall survival (OS). Patients received treatment in 28 day cycles with Bendamustine given on day 1 and day 2 (100 mg/m2 IV for CrCl≥60 mL/min, 90 mg/m2 IV for CrCl 59-30 mL/min, 70 mg/m2 IV for CrCl 15-30 mL/min) and dexamethasone 20-40 mg given weekly. Treatment was continued until disease progression or for up to 6 courses after complete response (CR). Reasons for discontinuation also included unacceptable toxicity, patient refusal, and non-response. Results :Of the 31 patients enrolled in the trial, 29 had evaluable responses and completed a median of 4 cycles of therapy (range 2-12) with one patient still undergoing treatment as of 7/1/2016. Median age of enrolled patients was 64 (range 42-78). Primarily involved organs included heart (53%), kidney (36%), nerve (7%), and liver (4%); 18 patients had ≥2 major organs involved. The patients received a median of 1.5 prior treatments (range 1-4) and 13 had received prior autologous stem cell transplants. Of evaluable patients (n=29), 41% had hematologic response to Ben/Dex (3% CR, 17% very good partial response, 24% PR). Of these 13 patients, 6 had a response after only 1 cycle of therapy and the median time to best response was 1 cycle (range 1-6 cycles). The median follow up of patients was relatively long, 18.4 months (range 1.5-41.5) and the median OS has not yet been reached (Figure 1). Event free survival defined as time to death, progression of disease or initiation of new therapy was 9.24 months (range 1.8-18.0) (Figure 2). Only 3 patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression while 8 stopped due to an adverse event (AE) although 5 AEs were only grade 1-2 events. There was 1 death during treatment that was unrelated to the study drug and due to underlying cardiac amyloidosis. The most common drug related all grade AEs included anemia (9%), fatigue (8%), and nausea (7%). Organ response was observed in 5 out of 16 patients with renal involvement and 2 out of the 19 patients with cardiac involvement. Conclusions : Bendamustine in combination with dexamethasone is active treatment in patients with AL amyloidosis who had failed multiple prior therapies and results in a significant hematologic response. Treatment was very well tolerated with a low incidence of severe AE in this delicate patient population. Therefore bendamustine is another treatment approach for AL amyloidosis patients who currently have limited therapeutic options. Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Lentzsch: Foundation One: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Comenzo:Karyopharm: Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Zonder:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Prothena: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Other: DSMC membership. Pregja:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Prothena: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Other: data safety monitoring committee. Landau:Prothena: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx/Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Long-Term AL Amyloidosis Survivors Among Non-Selected Referral Population

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117802 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3226-3226

Author(s):

Eli Muchtar ◽

Morie A. Gertz ◽

Martha Q. Lacy ◽

David Dingli ◽

Francis K. Buadi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Term Survival ◽

Long Term Survival ◽

Long Term Survivors

Abstract Introduction: Prognosis of AL amyloidosis has improved in recent years; however for many patients prognosis remains poor. We aimed to define patient-, disease- and treatment characteristics which are associated with long-term survival. Method: A retrospective chart review of all patients with biopsy-proven systemic AL amyloidosis, who were seen within 90 days of the confirmed diagnosis. Long-term survival was defined as 5-year and 10-year survival from the time of diagnosis. For 5-year survival we selected patients seen between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2012 (allowing a minimum of 5-year follow-up, n=1331) and for 10-year survival we screened patients seen between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2007 (allowing a minimum of 10-year follow-up; n=779). Treatment allocation was defined as the first regimen given, irrespective of subsequent treatment modifications. Results: Of the screening population, 498 patients survived ≥5 years from diagnosis (37% of the 5-year screening cohort) and 168 patients survived 10 years or more (22% of the 10-year screening cohort). Five-year survivors and 10-year survivors as compared to their counterparts were (Table): younger, higher proportion of women, more likely to have single organ involvement, less heart/liver/nerve involvement and more kidney involvement. Long-term survivors also had lower bone marrow plasma cell percentage at the time of diagnosis and lower tumor burden measured by the difference between involved to uninvolved light chain (dFLC). Similarly, long-term survivors had lower Mayo stages and higher systolic blood pressure. No difference in light chain isotype was observed between long-term survivors to long term non-survivors. Long-term survivors were less likely to be seen within 30 days of diagnosis compared to their counterparts (52% among 5-year survivors vs 67% among 5-year non-survivor; P<0.001). FISH abnormalities (data available for 555/1331 patients, 42%) were comparable between groups with regard to t(11;14) (50% among 5-year survival compared to 50% among 5-year non-survivors; P=0.93) and 13q abnormalities (34% vs 36%, respectively; P=0.53). However, trisomies were less frequently encountered in the 5-year survivor group (20% vs 29%, respectively; P=0.01), and far less common among 10-year survivors (11% vs 26%, respectively; P=0.04). Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was more likely to be associated with long-term survival. Of all patients who underwent ASCT, 74% survived more than 5 years and 49% survived more than 10 years. In comparison, among the standard-intensity therapies, 5-year survival rates for melphalan-dexamethasone, bortezomib-based regimens, immunomodulatory drug-based regimens and single agent dexamethasone/ melphalan-prednisone were 29%, 28%, 30% and 10%, respectively. The corresponding 10-year survival rates were 15%, 20%, 20% and 5%, respectively. Conclusions: Long-term AL survivors have distinct favorable baseline characteristics (including those introduced by referral bias) and ASCT as their initial therapy. Identification of these patients, especially the Mayo 2004 stage III and the Mayo 2012 stage III-IV patients who unexpectedly survived 10 years, will allow for further study and insights. Disclosures Gertz: Teva: Consultancy; Prothena: Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy; Ionis: Honoraria; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Research to Practice: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Medscape: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; annexon: Consultancy. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Dingli:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Kapoor:Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Russell:Vyriad: Equity Ownership. Kumar:KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dispenzieri:Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding.

Download Full-text