scholarly journals Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia (t-AML) and the Advantage of Intensive Chemotherapy: Real-Life Analysis from Two Regional French Centers

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4379-4379
Author(s):  
Amine Belhabri ◽  
Mael Heiblig ◽  
Stephane Morisset ◽  
Liliana Vila ◽  
Sandrine Hayette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Median Interval

Abstract Rational: Patients with t-AML are those previously treated for primary malignancy and are categorized with poor prognosis. t-AML treatment options include intensive chemotherapy (IC), hypomethylating agents (HMA) or low dose cytarabine (LDC). However, survival remains poor and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (Allo-HCT) could lead to better outcomes. The aim of this analysis is to assess the outcome of all consecutive t-AML pts from two regional centers in France, based on treatment intensity, and to identify prognostic factors. Patients and Methods: between January 2006 and December 2019, 112 adult pts diagnosed with t-AML occurring after treatment of solid tumors (ST; n=72), hematologic malignancies (HM; n=34) or autoimmune diseases (AID; n=6). Pts received chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy or high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (Auto-HCT) in some. All eligible t-AML pts received intensive chemotherapy (IC, n=55) with the combination of anthracycline and cytarabine in 48 pts and CPX-351 in 7 pts. Unfit pts received non-IC (9 LDC, 24 HMA). The third study group (24 pts) received best supportive care (BSC). Fifteen pts underwent HSCT in first CR. Statistical analysis: We performed a descriptive analysis of the baseline characteristics and each treatment group was compared with a Kruskal-Wallis test and a Pearson's Chi-square test. Survival curves (Kaplan-Meier method) were compared with a log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses on survival, relapse and NRM were done using Cox regression, Gray test, Fine & Gray regression. The bilateral level of significance was set at 5%. All analyses and graphics were made under the R program (v3.5.1). A pair-matched control analysis with de novo AML was performed only on pts who received IC matched for age, cytogenetics and ELN 2010 classification. Results: A total of 112 t-AML pts were identified, 56 were males (50%) with a median age of 68 yrs (19-87) at t-AML diagnosis. Before t-AML, 72 pts had ST (64.5%), 34 HM (30.5%) and 6 AID (5%). Forty-six pts (41%) received chemotherapy alone for their primary cancer, 17 (15%) radiotherapy alone, 49 (44%) radio chemotherapy, 17 (15%) auto-HCT and 6 (5%) long-term methotrexate for AID. Median interval from treatment of previous ST or HM to t-AML diagnosis was 4.7 years in ST, 6.6 years in HM and 21 years in AID (p=0.03). At t-AML diagnosis, 42% of pts presented an unfavorable karyotype and 44% an unfavorable ELN 2010 classification. Regarding molecular alterations, FLT3-ITD, FLT3-TKD, NPM1 and IDH1/2 mutations were observed in 6.9, 2.3, 11.5 and 2.3% of pts respectively. MECOM1 was overexpressed in 25.5% of cases. Among treated pts (n=88), 43 pts (49%) achieved CR: 4 from 33 (12%) in non-IC pts (3 in HMA and 1 in LDC) and 39 from 55 (71%) in IC pts. Fifteen pts (17%) underwent Allo-HCT with a median interval between AML diagnosis and Allo-HCT of 4.7 mo (2.6-17.5). The best response after transplantation was CR in 10 pts; at the last follow up, 4 pts are alive (3 in CR and 1 in relapse) and 11 died (5 from relapse, 5 from TRM causes and 1 from another subsequent malignancy). Overall, with a median follow up of 5.5 mo (0-144), the median OS and DFS were 9 mo (5.9-13.5) and 6.3 mo (5.3-10.3) respectively (Figure). There was a significant difference between the 3 treatment groups concerning OS (p<0.001) and DFS (p<0.001) with a significant difference in OS between IC and non-IC groups (p=0.02). In the 88 treated t-AML pts, with a median follow up of 8.2 mo (0.3-144), the median OS was 13.5 mo (10.3-19.6) and the median DFS was 8.2 mo (7-13.7). Multivariate analysis for total and treated populations showed no impact of all variables related to previous malignancies except for auto-HCT pre-t-AML (significant negative impact on OS, DFS, NRM), WBC at t-AML diagnosis (negative impact on OS, DFS) and chemotherapy (positive in total population on OS, DFS, NRM and negative impact of IC on OS and NRM in treated pts) . In IC treated pts, we showed, in a pair-matched analysis with de novo AML, no difference in term of OS and DFS due to a significant higher CI of NRM (p=0.045) at 24 mo (40% in t-AML versus 27.4% for de novo AML) and a lower CI of relapse (NS) at 24 mo (33% in t-AML versus 47.6% for de novo AML). Conclusion: The prognosis of t-AML remains poor and our study showed the advantage of using intensive chemotherapy whenever possible and, in comparison with de-novo AML, a higher NRM and a lower incidence relapse. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Nicolini: Sun Pharma Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kartos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding; Incyte Biosciences: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Results in 103 Treatment-Naïve Acute Myeloid Leukemia (TN-AML) Patients Not Candidates for Intensive Chemotherapy Using 5-Day and 10-Day Regimens of Guadecitabine (SGI-110), a Novel Hypomethylating Agent (HMA)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 458-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Gail J. Roboz ◽  
Patricia L. Kropf ◽  
Karen W.L. Yee ◽  
Casey L. O'Connell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction: Guadecitabine (SGI-110) is a novel next-generation HMA administered as a small volume subcutaneous (SC) injection which results in extended decitabine exposure. Phase 2 studies have been conducted in TN-AML patients who were not candidates for intensive chemotherapy using two different doses and schedules of guadecitabine. We report here a comparative efficacy and safety analysis of the 5-day and 10-day regimens. Methods: TN-AML patients who were not candidates for intensive chemotherapy based on age (≥ 65 y), poor performance status (PS 2), comorbidities, or poor risk cytogenetics were enrolled in 2 separate treatment cohorts in the Phase 2 study. In the first cohort, patients were randomized (1:1) to either 60 mg/m2/d or 90 mg/m2/d on Days 1-5 (5-day regimen). In the second cohort, patients were treated with 60 mg/m2/d on Days 1-5 and Days 8-12 (10-day regimen) for up to 4 cycles, followed by 60 mg/m2/d Days 1-5 in subsequent cycles. Cycles were scheduled every 28 days for both regimes with dose reductions/delays allowed based on response and tolerability. Patients remained on treatment as long as they continued to benefit with no unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the composite Complete Response (CRc): Complete Response (CR) + CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) + CR with incomplete neutrophil recovery (CRi) using modified International Working Group (IWG) criteria (Cheson et al, 2003). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: There was no difference in efficacy or safety between 60 and 90 mg/m2/d on the 5-day regimen (Yee et al, European Hematology Association meeting 2014, S647), so data are reported here for the two doses combined on the 5-day cohort. There were 51 patients treated in the 5-day regimen cohort and 52 treated with the 10-day regimen. There was no statistically significant difference in patient characteristics between the 2 regimens; median age 77.9 vs. 77.3 years ; male 59% vs. 65%; PS 2 or higher 35% vs. 40%; median BM blasts 40.0% vs. 49.5%; poor risk cytogenetics 46% vs. 43% for the 5-day and 10-day cohorts, respectively. Follow up of the 10-day cohort patients was shorter as it started after completion of enrolment of the 5-day cohort. The median follow up was 25.7 and 12.4 months and median number of cycles was 5 (range 1-26) and 3 (range 1-13) for the 5-day and 10-day cohorts, respectively. There was no significant difference in the primary efficacy endpoint, CRc, between the 2 regimens (p=0.43). CRc was achieved in 29/51 patients (57%) on the 5-day regimen (19 CR, 3 CRp, and 7 CRi) and in 25/52 patients (48%) on the 10-day regimen (16 CR, 5 CRp, and 4 CRi). Median OS was 10.5 and 8.7 months for the 5-day and 10-day cohorts, respectively (p=0.89). The 30, 60, and 90-day all-cause mortality rates were not statistically significant between the two cohorts: 5.9%, 15.7%, and 21.6% on the 5-day regimen and 1.9%, 17.3%, and 28.8% on the 10-day regimen. The most common Grade ≥3 AEs regardless of relationship to guadecitabine were: febrile neutropenia 59% vs. 60%, thrombocytopenia 47% vs. 38%, neutropenia 39% vs. 33%, anemia 27% vs. 19%, pneumonia 24% vs. 27%; and sepsis 12% vs. 19%, for the 5-day and 10-day cohorts respectively, none of which was statistically significant. Fifteen patients remain on treatment (5 from the 5-day cohort and 10 from the 10-day cohort). Conclusions: Guadecitabine is clinically active with a good safety profile in TN-AML patients not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. Unlike in relapsed/refractory AML, where the 10-day regimen of guadecitabine showed a trend toward improved efficacy (Roboz et al, Annals of Oncology 25 Supplement 4, 2014), there was no significant difference in either efficacy or safety between the 5-day and 10-day regimens in newly diagnosed AML patients. Guadecitabine 60 mg/m2/d SC Days 1-5 is currently being investigated in an 800-patient multicenter randomized phase 3 study in TN-AML patients unfit to receive intensive chemotherapy (ASTRAL-1 Phase 3 clinical trial: ClinicalTrials.gov reference NCT02348489). Disclosures Kropf: Teva Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. O'Connell:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Griffiths:Astex: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Rizzieri:Teva: Other: ad board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: ad board, Speakers Bureau. Stock:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Savona:Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenblat:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Berdeja:Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Wilson:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Lowder:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Taverna:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hao:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Issa:Janssen: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Azacitidine for Post-Remission Therapy in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia : Final Results of the Qoless AZA-Amle Randomized Trial

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
Esther Natalie Oliva ◽  
Anna Candoni ◽  
Prassede Salutari ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
Gianluigi Reda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Effect Modification ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Consolidation Chemotherapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Background: Elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) experience a low complete remission (CR) rate following intensive chemotherapy, a short duration of CR and high treatment-related mortality. Median survival is 7-12 months. Several reports suggest that maintenance therapy may improve survival. In particular, a recent report (Huls G, et al. Blood 2019) has shown that azacitidine (Aza) maintenance treatment improves 1-year disease-free survival (DFS) when adjusted for cytogenetics at diagnosis and platelet (PLT) count at randomization. Aims: This phase III, randomized, multicenter trial assesses the efficacy of post-remission Aza treatment versus best supportive care (BSC) in 54 AML subjects >60 years of age in CR after homogeneous induction and consolidation chemotherapy. Primary endpoint is the difference in DFS at 2 and 5 years between arms; main secondary endpoints are the difference in overall survival (OS), the number and length of hospitalizations and quality of life (QoL). Methods: AML subjects with >30% blasts, "de novo" or evolving from myelodysplastic syndrome and fit for intensive chemotherapy, received 2 courses of "3+7" therapy (daunorubicin 40 mg/m2 daily days 1-3 and cytarabine 100 mg/m2 daily IV infusion days 1-7). Subjects obtaining a CR received cytarabine 800 mg/m2 3 hour infusion bid days 1-3 and were randomized 1:1 to receive BSC or Aza at 50 mg/m2 s.c./i.v. for 7 days every 28 days and dose increase after 1st cycle to 75 mg/ m2 for further 5 cycles, followed by cycles every 56 days for 4.5 years or until relapse. QoL was assessed by QOL-E and EORTC QLQ-C30. Results: 149 subjects were included of median age 69, interquartile range (IQR) 65-74 years, and male/female 78/71. Amongst subjects not reaching randomization, 59 were relapsed/refractory, 22 died, 10 refused to continue, 3 were excluded for protocol violation, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Randomized patients (27 Aza, 27 BSC) were in study until relapse. Median follow-up was 9.9 months (IQR: 3.2-22.5). At 2 years post-randomization, no deaths occurred and 21 subjects in the BSC arm (median DFS 9 months, 95% CI 0-20) relapsed versus 18 subjects in the Aza arm (median DFS 11 months, 95% CI 1-21; P=0.33; Fig.1a). There was an effect modification by age on the effect of Aza versus BSC on relapse (P for effect modification=0.02) so that the effect of AZA was not significant for subjects <65 years and 65-73 years (P=0.65 and P=0.66, respectively) but was significant in subjects >73 years (P=0.008, Fig.1b). Cytogenetic risk (P=0.84), minimal residual disease (P=0.97), and platelet (PLT) count (below/above 100 Gi/L, P=0.47) did not modify the effect of Aza on DFS. However, cytogenetic risk and PLT count were confounders: after data adjustment, the effect of Aza on DFS just failed to reach statistical significance [HR (Aza vs BSC): 0.53, 95% CI: 0.26-1.05, P=0.068] . At 5 years post-randomization, no subjects died; 2 subjects on Aza and 1 subject on BSC withdrew consent and 1 subject on Aza in CR withdrew for relapse of bladder cancer. In the BSC arm, 23 subjects relapsed (median DFS 9 months, 95% CI: 0-20) versus 20 Aza subjects (median 11 months, 95% CI: 1-21; P=0.31, Fig.1a).Similar to 2 years post-randomization, at 5 years post-randomization an effect modification by age on the effect of Aza versus BSC was confirmed (P for effect modification=0.01) and the effect of Aza was significant only in subjects >73 years of age (P=0.007, Fig.1b). Again, data adjustment for cytogenetic risk and PLT count strengthened the link between Aza and DFS [HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.29-1.07, P=0.08]. Grade 3-4 adverse events (mainly neutropenia) were more frequent in the Aza (41%) than in the BSC arm (4%, P=0.002). Two Aza subjects were hospitalized twice for adverse events for a total of 22 and 26 days, respectively, versus no hospitalization for BSC subjects. QOL-E scores were poor at diagnosis and improved significantly at randomization, with further improvement for physical well-being. EORTC QLQ-C30 symptoms improved progressively over time. In linear mixed model analyses, no significant effect of Aza versus BSC was found for any QoL domain, confirming safety of Aza versus BSC. Summary/Conclusion: With the limitation of a small trial, we conclude that post-remission Aza in elderly AML patients receiving standard induction-consolidation chemotherapy is safe and is well-tolerated. Noteworthy, in patients over 73 years of age, Aza significantly prolongs DFS up to 5 years. Figure Disclosures Oliva: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Candoni:Merck SD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Di Raimondo:Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Musto:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mannina:Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martino:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol myers squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alati:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Unrelated Clones In Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia - Characterization and Prognostic Relevance

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4022-4022
Author(s):  
Julie Schanz ◽  
Fischer Stephanie ◽  
Claudia Haferlach ◽  
Georgia Bardi ◽  
Marilyn L. Slovak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
De Novo ◽  
International Study ◽  
Favourable Outcome ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Prognostic Relevance ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Progression Of Disease ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract Abstract 4022 Introduction: The occurrence of cytogenetically-unrelated clones is a rare but recognized event in haematological malignancies that may appear at either presentation or in further progression of disease. As yet, little is known about the composition and prognostic relevance of unrelated clones in MDS and AML. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze cases of unrelated clones in a large, multicentric and international study to further characterize their clinical relevance in myeloid disorders. Patients/Methods: A total of 95 patients with unrelated clones and their corresponding clinical data were collected from 10 different databases: MLL (n=30), German-Austrian-Swiss (16), Athens (11), City of Hope (10), Bobigny (6), Lund (5), Tokyo (5), Spanish (4), IMRAW (3), and Dortmund (2). 77 pts. (81.1%) had a diagnosis of primary MDS, 5 (5.3%) t-MDS, 9 (9.5%) de novo AML, and 4 (4.2%) AML following MDS. Abnormalities detected FISH only were excluded. Unrelated clones were defined as two abnormal clones that were not evolvable from each other. Overall survival and the risk of AML transformation was calculated. For comparison MDS cases without unrelated clones were included from the international MDS database, including 2901 pts. with primary MDS. Result: Two unrelated clones were seen in 80 pts. (84%), three in 14 (15%) and five in 1 patient (1%). The majority of cases showed one aberration per clone (84.5%). The most frequent single aberration was +8 (43.2%), followed by del(5q) (28.4%). Other anomalies were -7/del(7q) (14.7%), -Y (12.6%), del(20q) (9.5%), +21 (7.4%), i(17q) (5.3%) and del(9q) (5.3%). Complex aberrations were identified in 3/95 cases (3.2%) only. Patients with unrelated clones showed an overrepresentation of +8 (p<0.0001), -Y (p=0.031) and i(17q) (p=0.013) in comparison to patients without unrelated clones. A combination of del(5q) and +8 was observed in 13/95 (13.7%) cases. Other recurrent combinations were: -7/+8 (n=2; 2.1%), -Y/del(5q) (n=2; 2.1%) and del(5q)/20q- (n=2; 2.1%). Translocations occurred only in single cases. The median survival of all patients with unrelated clones was 26.5 months, a finding consistent with an intermediate prognosis. Patients with a +8 clone and a clone with any other aberration showed a median survival of 21.0 months. Combinations of del(5q)/+8 (median 45.8 months) as compared to isolated del(5q) showed no significant difference in survival and in comparison to cases with +8 plus a clone with any other aberration, led to a significantly better survival (p=0.004). Summary: Our data presents the largest series of MDS/AML patients showing unrelated clones published to date. While the most frequent combination del(5q)/+8 is associated with a favourable outcome, all other combinations have to be assigned to the intermediate risk group until further distinct combinations can be evaluated. Further data will be presented in detail. Disclosures: Haferlach: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Slovak:PerkinElmer: Employment. Ohyashiki:Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.: Research Funding. Giagounidis:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bennett:Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy.

Nilotinib in Imatinib-Resistant or -Intolerant Patients (pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): 48-Month Follow-up Results of a Phase 2 Study,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3770-3770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp D. le Coutre ◽  
Francis J. Giles ◽  
Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Norbert Gattermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lung Neoplasm ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Imatinib Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Abstract 3770 Background: Nilotinib is a selective and potent BCR-ABL TKI approved for the treatment of pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP, and for pts with CML-CP or CML-AP resistant to or intolerant of imatinib. Here, we present the 48-mo follow-up data from the 2101 trial for pts with imatinib resistance or intolerance. Methods: Pts were treated with nilotinib 400 mg twice daily (BID). Key endpoints included PFS (defined as progression to AP/BC or discontinuation due to disease progression as assessed by investigator or death from any cause) and OS (includes deaths during treatment or follow-up after discontinuation). Results: 321 pts were enrolled (70% imatinib resistant; 30% imatinib intolerant with resistance). At baseline (BL), 36% of pts were in CHR. At the time of data cutoff, 224/321 pts (70%) discontinued nilotinib therapy (Table), and 31% of all pts had at least 48 mo of treatment. The median nilotinib dose intensity was 789 mg/day (range, 151–1110) and 62% of pts received ≥ 400 mg BID nilotinib as their last dose available. Pts with BL CHR had a significantly higher PFS rate at 48 mo vs pts without BL CHR (71% vs 49%, respectively; P =.001). Only 11 (3%) pts progressed to advanced disease (AP/BC) during study. Estimated 48-mo OS rate was 78% (95% CI 74%-83%). Among resistant pts, those without BL mutations (n = 92) had a significantly higher OS rate at 48 mo vs pts with sensitive mutations at BL (n = 78) (84% vs 74%, respectively, P =.029); however, there was no significant difference in OS among pts with sensitive and insensitive mutations (Y253H, E255K/V or F359C/V, n = 27) at BL (74% vs 71%, respectively, P =.804). No new safety signals were observed, and few additional AEs were reported since 24 mo follow-up (Table). Biochemical lab abnormalities were generally mild, transient, and easily managed; grade 3/4 lipase elevation (19%), hypophosphatemia (18%), and hyperglycemia (13%) were most common. Reports of any-grade pleural effusions remained low (1%), and no new cases were reported with longer follow-up. No new cases of QTcF >500 ms and 3 new cases of QTcF increases > 60 ms from BL were reported. Nine pts died during treatment or within 28 days of discontinuation: 8 deaths were previously reported and occurred in the first 24 mo of follow-up; 1 additional death due to lung neoplasm occurred between 24 and 48 mo (35 mo). Conclusions: With longer follow up, nilotinib continues to be effective and well tolerated in pts with Ph+ CML-CP resistant to or intolerant of imatinib therapy. Nilotinib prevented progression to AP/BC in the majority of pts on treatment and was associated with high OS rates. No cumulative toxicity was observed. Data demonstrating the higher rate of PFS in pts who entered the study with a BL CHR suggest that switching pts to nilotinib prior to hematologic failure on imatinib, and according to current treatment guidelines, may maximize the efficacy of nilotinib therapy. Disclosures: le Coutre: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria. Giles:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Pinilla-Ibarz:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Larson:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Gattermann:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ottmann:Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Radich:BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Saglio:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy. Hughes:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy. Kim:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Branford:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Müller:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shou:Novartis: Employment. Novick:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fan:Novartis: Employment. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Efficacy of Single-Agent Decitabine in Relapsed and Primary Refractory (rel/ref) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2518-2518
Author(s):  
Andrew Hantel ◽  
Niloufer Khan ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Lucy A. Godley ◽  
Michael J. Thirman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Genetic Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Secondary Aml ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Wbc Count

Abstract Introduction Improving therapy for rel/ref AML remains a challenge. Decitabine, a DNA methyl-transferase inhibitor, initially showed promise in AML as a 5-day, first-line induction regimen and more recently as a 10-day regimen in older and unfit patients (1). However, little is known about the activity of decitabine in the rel/ref patient population despite increased use. Therefore, we sought to analyze the outcomes of these pts treated at our institution. Methods To obtain data regarding decitabine efficacy in rel/ref AML, we performed a retrospective analysis of outcomes following decitabine treatment in 34 adult pts treated at The University of Chicago from January 2009 to June 2014. Permission to access patient charts was granted by the medical centerÕs Institutional Review Board. AML was defined by WHO criteria, genetic risk grouping and complete remission (CR) was according to ELN classification; PR was defined as >50% decrease in bone marrow blasts and normalization of blood counts. Rel/ref AML was defined as either having had a prior CR with recurrence of disease or having received a prior induction regimen (1-2 cycles) without CR. Results Median pt age was 62 yrs (range, 18-81) and 60% were male. Median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 5 (range, 0-8); 29% had ECOG performance status 0-1 and 71% had >2. 21 pts (62%) had de novo AML (7 with myelodysplasia-related changes), 3 (9%) had therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (t-MN), and 10 (29%) had secondary AML after myelodysplastic syndrome. 6% were in the ELN favorable genetic group, 3% intermediate-I, 18% intermediate-II, and 67% adverse; 2 cases were unevaluable. The median number of prior treatment regimens was three. 9% had received prior azacitidine, 85% had received prior HiDAC, and 38% had a prior allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT). 34 pts received a total of 71 cycles of decitabine, 20 mg/m2 daily, in 5 or 10-day cycles every 28 days. All patients received 10-day courses, 91% had an initial 10-day course, and 74% had only 10-day courses. The median number of cycles per pt was 2; 59% received >1 cycle. 7 (21%) achieved CR and 4 (12%) had a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate (OR) of 33%. Responses occurred in 24% of pts with de novo AML, 66% with t-MN, and 50% with secondary AML. Intermediate and adverse group pts had OR of 14% and 39%, respectively. All pts achieving CR did so after 1 cycle; PR required a median of 3 cycles. Pts who achieved CR or PR had a significantly lower pretreatment WBC count (median, 9.5 vs 49.5 x 103/µL in non-responders; p=0.015) and blast percentage (44 vs 59.4; p=0.035) than those who did not. Pts with secondary AML or t-MN had a higher probability of OR compared to those with de novo AML (54 vs 23%; p=0.042). Median overall survival (OS) of all pts was 256 days; prior SCT was associated with reduced OS (p=0.017). When comparing de novo to secondary AML & t-MN, 1-year OS was not significantly different (Figure 1). Responders had a significantly longer OS (median, 622 days vs 278 days for non-responders; p=0.012). Age, race, CCI, ECOG PS, genetic risk group, prior HiDAC, dysplasia, azacitidine, and number of prior treatments did not impact OR or OS. 16 (47%) pts proceeded to SCT. During treatment, 70% had a grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity (based on NCI CTACE v4.0); the most common was fatigue. The median number of hospitalizations for complications per patient was 2 (range, 0-7). Causes of hospitalization were febrile neutropenia (40%), infection (22%), cytopenias (18%), rash (6%), acute kidney injury (6%), and 8% were for other causes. Conclusion Decitabine treatment of 34 adults with rel/ref AML resulted in an OR of 33% (21% CR) and allowed nearly one-half of these pts to proceed to SCT. All pts achieving CR did so after 1 cycle. Responding pts had improved OS over those without response (p=0.012). Interestingly, secondary AML or t-MN were 7.8 times more likely to achieve a response compared to de novo AML (p=0.046); lower WBC count and marrow blast percentage also correlated with higher OR. Further delineation of molecular subsets associated with response to decitabine should be evaluated in a larger prospective trial in this high-risk AML population. Citation 1. Blum KA, et al. Phase I trial of low dose decitabine targeting DNA hypermethylation in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: dose-limiting myelosuppression without evidence of DNA hypomethylation. Br J of Haem. Jul 2010;150(2):189-195. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Off Label Use: Decitabine is indicated for treatment of MDS but is often used to treat newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory AML. In this study we analyzed results of patients with AML who were treated with decitabine in the relapsed/refractory setting.. Thirman:AbbVie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Odenike:Sunesis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Liu:Astra Zeneca/Medimmune: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca/Medimmune: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Stock:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Updated Outcomes of Fludarabine/Melphalan/Bortezomib (Flu/Mel/Vel) Conditioning for Upfront Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5885-5885
Author(s):  
Taiga Nishihori ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
Rachid Baz ◽  
Jose L Ochoa-Bayona ◽  
Kenneth H. Shain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Allogeneic Hct ◽  
Genetics Research ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Unrelated Donors

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma remains incurable despite impressive array of available novel agents and therapeutic strategies. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only potentially curative option for patients with multiple myeloma but it is limited by its toxicities. We previously reported initial result of a phase 2 study of upfront allogeneic HCT in myeloma patients achieving at least very good partial response (VGPR) after initial therapy (Nishihori, et al. ASH 2013 abstract 3390) and here we report more mature results after a median follow up of 3 years. Methods: Twenty seven myeloma patients received allogeneic HCT between 01/2010 and 02/2015 at Moffitt Cancer Center (NCT 00948922). Eligible patients were age ≤ 60, achieving first ≥ VGPR or complete response (CR), and have 8/8 HLA-matched related or unrelated donors. Conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine 30 mg/m2 for 4 days (days -6, -5, -4, and -3) and melphalan 70 mg/m2 for 2 days (days -4 and -3) followed by a single dose of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on day -3 (Flu/Mel/Vel regimen). GVHD prophylaxis was initially left to the discretion of physicians but later modified to only tacrolimus/methotrexate. No maintenance therapy was prescribed after allogeneic HCT. Results: The median age at transplant was 50 (range, 25-58) years. Disease status at the time of allogeneic HCT was VGPR (n=17: 63%) and CR/stringent CR (n=10: 37%). All patients received unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cell grafts from HLA-matched related donors (n=14) or HLA-matched unrelated donors (n=13). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was tacrolimus plus either methotrexate (n=19: 70%), or mycophenolate mofetil (n=4), or sirolimus (n=4). All patients achieved neutrophil engraftment with a median of 15 (range, 11-19) days. Platelet engraftment was achieved with a median of 17 (range, 13 - 35) days and 2 patients did not recover platelets. The cumulative incidences of grades II-IV and grades III-IV acute GVHD at day 100 were 63.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 43.1-81.1) and 19.6% (95%CI: 5.4-39.9), respectively. The cumulative incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 56.4% (95%CI: 36.3-75.5) at 1-year. The cumulative incidences of transplant-related mortality at day 100, 1 year and 2 years were 7.4% (95%CI: 0.8-20.0), 11.1% (95%CI: 2.7-25.4), and 11.1% (95%CI: 2.7-25.4), respectively. Progression-free survival estimates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 74.1% (95%CI: 53.2-86.7), 65.1% (95%CI: 43.3-80.2), and 65.1% (95%CI: 49.9-87.5), respectively. With a median follow up of 39 months for surviving patients, overall survival estimates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 85% (95%CI: 64.9-94.1), 75.4% (95%CI: 52.6-88.3), and 69.1% (95%CI: 53.8-93.5), respectively. Conclusions: The results of the this phase 2 trial of upfront allogeneic HCT with fludarabine/melphalan/bortezomib (Flu/Mel/Vel) conditioning are promising and provide the rationale for reasonable potentially curative option to younger and fit patients who are eligible for upfront intensive consolidation strategy. This approach may be potentially valuable for those with high-risk myeloma and a multicenter study is currently being conducted (BMT CTN protocol 1302:NCT02440464). Disclosures Nishihori: Novartis: Research Funding; Signal Genetics: Research Funding. Baz:Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Signal Genetics: Research Funding. Shain:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen/Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Signal Genetics: Research Funding; Takeda/Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Alsina:Signal Genetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Factors Influencing Long-Term Hematopoietic Function Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2186-2186
Author(s):  
Alissa Visram ◽  
Natasha Kekre ◽  
Christopher N. Bredeson ◽  
Jason Tay ◽  
Lothar B. Huebsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background/Objective: Mobilized peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitor cells are the most common stem cell source for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT). Successful short-term stem cell engraftment requires collection of at least 2x106 CD34+ cells/kg. The American Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT) recommends a stem cell infusion target of 3-5 x106 cells/kg (Giralt et al. 2014). However, the number of CD34+ cells to reinfuse to ensure long-term engraftment has not been established. Plerixafor, a reversible CXCR4 antagonist, increases CD34+ cell yield at collection even in patients who are predicted poor mobilizers (PPM). Although plerixafor could be used universally for all collections, this may not be the most cost-effective strategy (Veltri et al. 2012). This study sought to determine the minimum number of CD34+ cells/kg required for adequate long-term hematopoiesis, identify factors associated with poor long-term hematopoiesis, and determine if plerixafor mobilization improved long-term peripheral blood counts. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent auto-HSCT between January 2004 and September 2013 at The Ottawa Hospital, for management of hematological malignancies. Peripheral blood cell counts were collected from 1 to 5 years after auto-HSCT, or until disease relapse. Poor long-term hematopoiesis was defined as an ANC <1 x109/L, hemoglobin <100 g/L, or platelets <100 x109/L. Patients were stratified into groups based on the infused CD34+ concentration (in cells/kg), and the proportion of patients with poor long-term hematopoiesis at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post auto-HSCT was compared with chi square tests. Long-term clinical outcomes (platelet and packed red blood cell transfusions, and post auto-HSCT infection rates) were compared between plerixafor-mobilized patients and PPM (defined as patients with pre-collection CD34+ <2 x 106 cells/kg) with standard mobilization regimens. Results: This study included 560 patients who underwent auto-HSCT, 210 with multiple myeloma and 350 with lymphoma. At 1 and 5 years post auto-HSCT 377 and 104 patients were included, respectively. A dose dependent improvement 1 year after auto-HSCT was seen in patients who received 0-2.99 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (24.4%, n= 41) compared to patients who received 5-9.99 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (11%, n=154, p=0.051) and ³10 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (4.5%, n=66, p=0.006). Though there was a trend towards lower CD34+ infusions and poorer hematopoietic function (see table 1), there was no statistically significant difference in hematopoietic function based on CD34+ infusion concentrations after 1 year post auto-HSCT. 10 patients received <2 x106 CD34+ cells/kg, of whom the rate of inadequate hematopoiesis was 33% at 1 year (n=6) and 0% (n=1) at 5 years post auto-HSCT. Factors that increased the risk of poor hematopoiesis over the course of study follow up, based on a univariate analysis, included advanced age (OR 1.189, p=0.05), multiple prior collections (OR 2.978, p=0.035), and prior treatment with more than two chemotherapy lines (OR 2.571, p=0.02). Plerixafor-mobilized patients (n=25), compared to PPM (n=197), had a significantly higher median CD34+ cell collection (4.048 x109/L and 2.996 x109/L cells/kg, respectively, p=0.005). There was no significant difference in overall cytopenias, transfusion requirements, or infection rates between plerixafor-mobilized and PPM patients over the course of the study follow up. Conclusion: Low pre-collection CD34+ counts, advanced age, multiple prior collections, and more than two prior chemotherapy treatments adversely affected long-term hematopoiesis post auto-HSCT. We support the transfusion target of 3-5 x 106 cells/kg, as proposed by the ASBMT, given that at 5 years post auto-HSCT there was no statistical or clinically significant difference in hematopoietic function with higher CD34+ infusion targets. While mobilization with plerixafor significantly increased overall CD34+ cell collection when compared with PPM, long-term hematopoietic function and clinical outcomes were not different. This finding supports the practise of limiting plerixafor use only to patients who are PPM, thereby facilitating adequate stem cell collection and early engraftment, as opposed to universal plerixafor mobilization. Disclosures Sabloff: Lundbeck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Heterogeneous Definitions of Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Yield Distinct Outcomes in Response to First-Line Treatment with Hypomethylating Agents (HMA) and Venetoclax (Ven)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1216-1216
Author(s):  
Irena Tan ◽  
Matthew Schwede ◽  
Paul Phan ◽  
Raymond Yin ◽  
Tian Y Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Hematologic Malignancy ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Secondary Mutation ◽  
Mutation Profile ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract Background: The combination of HMA and venetoclax is now standard of care for patients with AML who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. Elderly patients are more likely to have secondary AML (sAML), although the presence of an antecedent hematologic malignancy is often not apparent by history. Lindsley et al (Blood, 2015) showed that a somatic mutation in SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, ZRSR2, ASXL1, EZH2, BCOR, or STAG2 is &gt;95% specific for sAML and associated with worse outcomes. While outcomes with HMA/ven in patients meeting standard criteria for sAML have recently been reported (Pullarkat, ASCO 2021), we set out to conduct a real-world analysis of sAML patients receiving HMA/ven, including those with a secondary mutation profile (SMP) as described by Lindsley et al. We hypothesized that-when treated with HMA/ven-outcomes of patients with SMP may be most similar to those with de novo AML. Methods: Patients diagnosed with AML at Stanford Cancer Institute from 4/2017-3/2021 and treated with front-line HMA/ven were retrospectively reviewed. These included patients previously treated with HMA monotherapy for an antecedent hematologic malignancy and those who had previously received ≤ 3 cycles of HMA monotherapy for AML. Responses were classified per the modified International Working Group response criteria. Overall survival (OS) was assessed for all patients, and for patients who had a complete response (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), duration of response (DoR) was also assessed. Statistical analyses were performed in R using the logrank test, with hazard ratios (HR) computed using the Cox proportional hazards model. For multivariate analyses, p-values for a specific variable were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: 82 patients met criteria for inclusion; 78 had valid response assessments and 49 (62.8%) had achieved a CR or CRi at first response assessment. Median age was 72 years, with 3 patients younger than 60. 62 patients were male, median ECOG performance status (PS) was 1, median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 6, median time to death or end of follow-up from the start of treatment was 366 days, and 58% of patients had adverse risk AML per ELN guidelines. Fig 1a demonstrates demographics for de novo, sAML (excluding SMP), and patients with SMP AML. 13 patients met criteria for AML-MRC, 23 patients had prior history of antecedent hematologic malignancy (18 with MDS or CMML, 5 with MDS/MPN overlap or MPN), 12 had tAML, and 20 patients possessed a SMP and did not meet criteria for the other three categories of sAML. 14 patients with de novo AML were characterized by the absence of any of the above factors. Patients with de novo AML were less likely to have adverse risk disease (29% vs. 64% in others) and had lower CCI scores (mean 5.1 vs. 6.2) but had no significant differences in age, gender, follow-up time, or PS. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of CR/CRi between the different subgroups or the different types of sAML; 69% of patients with de novo AML, 79% of SMP patients, and 57% of patients with other types of sAML achieved a CR or CRi. However, SMP patients had response durations and OS patterns similar to patients with de novo AML (Fig 1b and 1c), and when grouped with de novo patients, both DoR (HR = 3.5, p = 0.047, Fig 1d) and OS (HR = 2.1, p = 0.042, Fig 1e) were significantly longer than those of the sAML patients. Neither DoR nor OS were significantly longer when the SMP patients were grouped with sAML patients (respectively: HR = 3.3, p = 0.22, Fig 1f; HR = 1.5, p = 0.37, Fig 1g). In multivariate Cox proportional regression adjusting for age, ELN risk category, CCI, and PS, worse OS for sAML patients was maintained relative to the SMP and de novo patients (HR 2.9, p = 0.036), although the difference in DoR was no longer significant (HR 4.4, p= 0.10). Conclusions: Patients meeting standard definitions of sAML had worse outcomes than those with de novo AML when treated with HMA/ven in a retrospective, real-world analysis. Although a secondary mutation profile as described by Lindsley et al may be helpful in identifying patients with sAML, when treated with HMA/ven, patients with this profile have outcomes that align more closely with those of patients with de novo AML. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mannis: Astex, Forty Seven Inc/Gilead, Glycomimetics, and Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie, Agios, Astellas Pharma, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech, MacroGenics, Pfizer, and Stemline: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Exome Array Analyses Identify Low-Frequency Germline Variants Associated with Increased Risk of AML in a HLA-Matched Unrelated Donor Blood and Marrow Transplant Population

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 42-42
Author(s):  
Alyssa I. Clay ◽  
Theresa Hahn ◽  
Qianqian Zhu ◽  
Li Yan ◽  
Leah Preus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
De Novo Aml ◽  
Normal Cytogenetics

Abstract Both genome wide association studies (GWAS) of common variation and exome wide association studies (EXWAS) of rare variation have successfully identified disease susceptibility variants for a variety of diseases. One GWAS of inherited susceptibility to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) has been conducted, but no EXWAS have been performed to measure risk of AML attributable to low-frequency constitutional genetic variation. We performed the first EXWAS of risk of AML as a nested case-control study in the DISCOVeRY-BMT (Determining the Influence of Susceptibility Conveying Variants Related to one-Year mortality after BMT) cohorts. The DISCOVeRY-BMT parent study examined transplant-related mortality in leukemia patients undergoing unrelated donor allogeneic BMT. To identify low frequency variants and genes contributing to increased susceptibility to AML we used genotype data from the Illumina HumanExome BeadChip typed in the DISCOVeRY-BMT cohorts; the HumanExome BeadChip contains 242,901 variants, which are mainly protein-coding variants. The optimal sequence kernel association test (SKAT-O) was used to analyze gene-level associations with risk of AML. These gene-based tests evaluate the cumulative effects of multiple single gene variants on risk of AML. Analyses were performed in all European American AML cases and two subtypes: 1) de novo AML, 2) de novo AML with normal cytogenetics. Models were adjusted for age at transplant and principal components to control for population stratification. For gene-based tests at least 2 variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) ≤ 5%, were required to be present in the gene. This yielded a total of 13,687 genes tested, and a Bonferroni corrected significance level of P<3.65 x 10-6. Association tests were performed in 1,189 AML cases reported to CIBMTR 2000-08 (Cohort 1) and 327 AML cases reported to CIBMTR from 2009-11 (Cohort 2). Controls in Cohorts 1 (n=1,986) and 2 (n= 515) were 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donors who passed a comprehensive medical exam and deemed healthy. We used metaSKAT to combine Cohorts 1 and 2 and obtain p-values of association with AML. We present the results of gene-level tests significant in both cohorts. The likely pathogenicity of these variants was determined in silico using SIFT, PolyPhen and MutationTaster. Patient characteristics are in Table 1. DNMT3A, on chromosome 2, was associated in the gene-based test with risk of AML (Pmeta=1.70x10-9, Table 2). Three missense variants at MAF <1% comprise both overall AML and de novo AML gene-based association: exm177559 (Asn->Ser), exm177507 (Arg->His), and exm177543 (Arg->Trp). Normal cytogenetics de novo AML gene-based assocations consisted of only 2 of these variants: exm177559 and exm177507 (Table 2). While prevalence of exm177507 is <1% for all AML cases, in de novo AML with normal cytogenetics the MAF was higher at 3%. The other 2 variants had a MAF<1% irrespective of subtype. Somatically, DNMT3A is most frequently mutated in hematologic malignancies, with >30% of de novo AML cases with a normal karyotype and >10% of MDS patients having DNMT3A mutations. Although these are germline gene associations all three of the variants found have been reported somatically in hematologic malignancies. In 200 AML cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) p.R882H (represented as exm177507 on the exome chip) was a frequent somatic mutation (25%). Exm177543 (p.R635W) and exm177559 (p.N501S) are reported in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) as somatic mutations involved in hematopoietic and lymphoid tissue in both cell lines and humans. Exm177507 and exm177543 show evidence of pathogenicity in all three in silico tools, while exm177559 was reported as deleterious and disease causing by Sift and MutationTaster, respectively. Our results show that multiple potentially pathogenic missense germline variants in DNMT3A comprise the gene-based association with AML, specifically de novo AML with normal cytogenetics. Given the functional nature of these variants it is possible germline risk stratification could be informative in determining AML risk, and subsequently development of AML harboring DNMT3A mutations. Confirmation of these findings in additional cohorts could have implications for individualized risk screening, prediction and prognosis. Additional cytogenetic subgroup analyses, including treatment-related AML, are underway. Disclosures Hahn: Novartis: Equity Ownership; NIH: Research Funding. McCarthy:Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; The Binding Site: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gamida Cell: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sucheston-Campbell:NIH/NCI: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Lenalidomide Maintenance Significantly Improves Survival Figures in Patients with Relapsed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (rDLBCL) Who Are Not Eligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT): Final Results of a Multicentre Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 474-474
Author(s):  
Andrés J.M. Ferreri ◽  
Marianna Sassone ◽  
Francesco Zaja ◽  
Alessandro Re ◽  
Michele Spina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Multicentre Phase ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with rDLBCL not eligible for ASCT or experiencing relapse after ASCT have a low likelihood of cure. Single-drug maintenance after salvage therapy may be an attractive strategy to prolong survival in these pts. Lenalidomide (LEN) is a suitable candidate for long-lasting maintenance as it is an oral drug, active against DLBCL, that can be taken for years with an acceptable toxicity profile. Accordingly, we designed a multicentre phase II trial addressing LEN maintenance in pts with chemosensitive relapse of DLBCL not eligible for ASCT or experiencing relapse after ASCT (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00799513). Methods: HIV-neg pts (age ≥18 ys) with histologically-proven de novo or transformed DLBCL and relapsed disease responsive to conventional rituximab-containing salvage therapy were registered and treated with LEN 25 mg/day for 21 days out of 28, until lymphoma progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). Simon's two-stage optimal design was used. To demonstrate a 1-yr PFS improvement from 30% (P0) to 50% (P1), 47 pts (one-sided; α 5%; β 80%) were needed. Maintenance would be considered effective if ≥19 pts were progression-free survivors at 1 yr. Cell of origin was assessed by NanoString Technology and Hans algorithm, and cereblon expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Results: 46 of 48 enrolled pts were assessable (median age 72 ys; range 34-86); 36 pts had de novo DLBCL, 10 had transformed DLBCL. All pts were previously treated with anthracycline- and rituximab-based combination, plus ASCT in 6 pts; the median TTP after the prior therapy was 16 months (range 3-121). Thirty-three pts were enrolled at 1st relapse, 13 at 2nd relapse; salvage therapy contained high doses of cytarabine or ifosfamide in two-thirds of cases, and response was complete in 26 pts and partial in 20. Most pts had unfavourable features: IPI ≥2 in 38 (83%) pts, advanced stage in 35 (76%), extranodal disease in 29 (63%), high LDH level in 21 (46%); 28 (61%) pts were older than 70 ys. At a median follow-up of 25 (range 6-87) months, 556 LEN courses were delivered, with an average of 12 courses/pt (range 3-41); 19 pts are still in treatment. LEN was well tolerated: with the exception of neutropenia, grade 3-4 toxicities were uncommon, occurring in ≤3% of delivered courses. Infections were rare, and well controlled with oral antibiotics (grade 1-2 in 8 courses; grade 3 in 3). LEN dose reduction was indicated in 23 pts (transient in 19), and was due to neutropenia (12), rash (7), diarrhoea (2), and neurotoxicity (2); LEN was discontinued in 6 of them. One (2%) pt died of acute toxicity (intestinal infarction) and one due to secondary myelodysplastic syndrome at 56 months of follow-up. Pts with HBV/HCV seropositivity (n=12) or prior ASCT (n=6) did not experience unexpected toxicity after >1 yr of treatment. At one year from trial registration, 28 pts were still progression free, which was significantly higher than the pre-determined efficacy threshold (n≥19). During the whole observation period, there were 21 events: progressive disease in 19 pts, death of toxicity in one, death while off therapy in one, with a 1-yr PFS (primary endpoint) of 70 ± 7%. The duration of response to LEN was longer than response duration after the prior treatment line in 27 (59%) pts, and was twice as long in 15 of them. The benefit of LEN maintenance was observed both in pts with de novo or transformed DLBCL. According to the Hans' algorithm, the 1-yr PFS was 64 ± 11% for GCB-DLBCL and 67 ± 11% for nonGCB-DLBCL (p= 0.67). Results using the Nanostring technique were consistent with the Hans' algorithm, with a concordance rate of 86%. There was no significant association between cereblon expression and PFS. Multivariate analysis confirmed that treatment at first relapse and a prior TTP ≥12 months were independently associated with better PFS. Overall, 33 (72%) pts are alive, with a 1- and 3-yr OS of 81 ± 6% and 71 ± 8%, respectively. Conclusions: With the limitations of a non-randomized design, this trial soundly promotes the use of LEN maintenance in pts with chemosensitive relapse of DLBCL not eligible for ASCT or experiencing relapse after ASCT. LEN was well tolerated in this elderly population, with survival benefit both in pts with de novo or transformed DLBCL, and both in pts with GCB- or nonGCB-DLBCL. These results warrant further investigation of immunomodulatory drugs as maintenance in these high-risk pts. Disclosures Spina: Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker Fee; Mundipharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker Fee. Rusconi:Teva: Consultancy, Other: Congress attendance; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Congress attendance. Couto:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ren:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document