Real World Outcomes of Adult Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving Fixed Dose Intravenous Rituximab in the Philippine General Hospital

Abstract Introduction. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most frequent type of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The backbone of therapy includes rituximab at a dose of 375 mg/m 2 however, the rationale for which is not explained in pharmacokinetic studies but has been the set dose for succeeding clinical trials. In limited-resource settings, standard regimen or fixed dose adaptations of certain cancer medicines are common. This study investigated the clinical profile and treatment outcomes of patients who received fixed dose intravenous (IV) rituximab of 500 mg per cycle for DLBCL. Methods. This study was a retrospective cohort conducted through review of records of adults diagnosed with DLBCL given fixed dose IV rituximab of 500mg at the University of the Philippines - Philippine General Hospital from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019. Clinical characteristics, stage, international prognostication index (IPI), body surface area dosing, response assessment, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were recorded. The computed sample size was 110 patients however, all patients within the period of observation were included. Results. One hundred thirty-two adult patients with DLBCL were identified of which, 77 received a rituximab-based regimen, and 71 received fixed dose IV rituximab of 500mg and were included in the study. Table 1 summarizes the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants. The mean age was 46 years old with a slight male predominance. Eighty percent of patients received a dose below 350 mg/m 2. Fifty-one percent of patients had bulky and advanced stage of disease. Thirty-nine percent of patients presented with B symptoms. Eighty-two percent had one or no comorbidities on consult. Sixty-six percent had a low-risk IPI of 0 or 1, 30% with a low-intermediate risk IPI of 2, and 4% with a high-intermediate risk IPI of 3. Ninety percent of patients received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP). The mean number of doses of rituximab received was 6 and patients received treatment at a mean interval of 1 month from diagnosis. Notably, only three patients underwent immunohistochemistry studies to determine the subtype of DLBCL. All three were found to have activated B cell as the cell of origin. Table 2 summarizes the distribution of outcomes in relation to average dose received. Of the original 71 who received fixed-dose Rituximab, 25 patients had no documentation of objective response assessment. Thirty or 43% showed complete response and 20% showed progressive disease. Complete response was documented across dose ranges from 250 to 400 mg/m 2 however, 77% of complete responders received a dose lower than 350 mg/m 2. Conversely, 79% of patients with progressive disease received a dose lower than 350 mg/m 2. There were no noted significant associations between these outcomes and the average dose range of rituximab received based on Fisher's exact test. This finding is also illustrated in Figure 1, which is a boxed plot diagram of the range of dose received across clinical outcomes. Because of the limited number of patients and sparse distribution of outcomes, a Cox proportional hazard model could not be made. Table 3 shows the distribution of characteristics across clinical outcomes. Age and follow-up time were significantly different across the three groups. No difference was found for the other clinical variables. A Kaplan-Meier survival plot could not be constructed due to the high lost to follow-up rate, with 66% of patients being lost to follow-up at time of analysis. Discussion and Conclusions. The study identified the high use of fixed dose IV rituximab in our hospital rather than the recommended dosing of 375 mg/m 2. These patients showed comparable initial response rates of fixed dose rituximab in adult patients with DLBCL compared to response rates from previous RCTs, however long-term response rates were not evaluable. The study was not able to demonstrate the durability of response, given the lack of data and high lost to follow-up rate. At the time of analysis, the use of subcutaneous (SC) rituximab has not progressed in the treatment center, and the prohibitive cost of both IV and SC rituximab has affected its optimal use. Pharmacokinetic modeling and longer-term cohorts of fixed-dose studies may provide more robust data to support the use of fixed-dose treatment strategies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jimeno: Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharp & Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Servier: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Escasa: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: lecturer, registration and travel grants; Novartis: Other: lecturer, registration and travel grants; Roche: Other: lecturer; Sun Pharma: Other: lecturer, registration and travel grants.

Download Full-text

Impact of Interim FDG-PET (iPET) in the Outcomes of Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Receiving DA-EPOCH-R

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122393 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2898-2898

Author(s):

Vania Phuoc ◽

Leidy Isenalumhe ◽

Hayder Saeed ◽

Celeste Bello ◽

Bijal Shah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Fdg Pet ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

End Of Treatment

Introduction: 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) remains the standard of care for baseline and end of treatment scans for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, the role of interim FDG-PET remains not as well defined across aggressive NHLs, especially in the era of high-intensity chemoimmunotherapy. Interim FDG-PET (iPET) can serve as an early prognostic tool, and prior studies evaluating the utility of iPET-guided treatment strategies primarily focused on diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and frontline R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Classification criteria systems assessing response also differ between studies with no clear consensus between use of Deauville criteria (DC), International Harmonization Project (IHP), and the ΔSUVmax method. Methods: This study evaluates our institutional experience with iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin with or without Rituximab) in aggressive NHLs. We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who started on DA-EPOCH ± R between 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2018 for aggressive NHLs. Response on interim and end-of-treatment (EOT) scans were graded per DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods, and progression free survival (PFS) probability estimates were calculated with chi-square testing and Kaplan Meier method. PFS outcomes were compared between interim negative and positive scans based on each scoring method. Outcomes were also compared between groups based on interim versus EOT positive or negative scans. Results: We identified 70 patients with aggressive NHLs who received DA-EPOCH ± R at our institute. The most common diagnoses were DLBCL (61%) followed by Burkitt's lymphoma (10%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (9%), plasmablastic lymphoma (7%), gray zone lymphoma (6%), primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma (1%), primary effusion lymphoma (1%), and other high-grade NHL not otherwise specified (3%). Of the 43 patients with DLBCL, 21/43 (49%) had double hit lymphoma (DHL) while 7/43 (16%) had triple hit lymphoma (THL), and 3/43 (7%) had MYC-rearranged DLBCL while 2/43 (5%) had double expressor DLBCL. Thirty nine out of 70 (56%) were female, and median age at diagnosis was 58.39 years (range 22.99 - 86.86 years). Most patients had stage IV disease (49/70, 70%), and 43/70 (61%) had more than one extranodal site while 45/70 (64%) had IPI score ≥ 3. Forty-six out of 70 (66%) received central nervous system prophylaxis, most with intrathecal chemotherapy (44/70, 63%). Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) had iPET available while 6/70 (9%) had interim computerized tomography (CT) scans. Fifty-six out of 70 (80%) had EOT PET, and 4/70 (6%) had EOT CT scans. Sustained complete remission occurred in 46/70 (66%) after frontline DA-EPOCH ± R (CR1), and 12/70 (17%) were primary refractory while 5/70 (7%) had relapse after CR1. Four of 70 (6%) died before cycle 3, and 3/70 (4%) did not have long-term follow-up due to transition of care elsewhere. Median follow-up was 15.29 months (range 0.85 - 60.09 months). There was significantly better PFS observed if iPET showed DC 1-3 compared to DC 4-5 (Χ2=5.707, p=0.0169), and PFS was better if iPET was negative by IHP criteria (Χ2=4.254, p=0.0392) or ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=6.411, p=0.0113). Comparing iPET to EOT PET, there was significantly better PFS if iPET was negative with EOT PET negative (iPET-/EOT-) compared to iPET positive with EOT negative (iPET+/EOT-), and iPET+/EOT+ and iPET-/EOT+ had worse PFS after iPET-/EOT- and iPET+/EOT- respectively. This pattern in iPET/EOT PFS probability remained consistent when comparing DC (Χ2=30.041, p<0.0001), IHP (Χ2=49.078, p<0.0001), and ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=9.126, p=0.0104). These findings fit clinical expectations with positive EOT scans indicating primary refractory disease. There was no significant difference in PFS when comparing DLBCL versus non-DLBCL (Χ2=3.461, p=0.0628) or DHL/THL versus non-DHL/THL diagnoses (Χ2=2.850, p=0.0914). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a prognostic role of iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R for aggressive NHLs. Significant differences in PFS were seen when graded by DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods used in prior studies and when comparing interim versus EOT response. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Disclosures Bello: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Chavez:Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Poor Outcomes Among Patients Failing Dose-Adjusted EPOCH in Aggressive Lymphoma: A Collaborative, Retrospective Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1518.1518 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1518-1518 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jackie Vandermeer ◽

Allison M Winter ◽

Ajay K. Gopal ◽

Ryan D. Cassaday ◽

Brian T. Hill ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Salvage Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

First Line Therapy

Abstract Introduction Among patients with aggressive B-NHL who fail RCHOP, about half respond to standard salvage regimens and may proceed to curative-intent, transplant-based therapy. However, whether pts failing more intensive regimens such as dose-adjusted, infusional EPOCH benefit from standard salvage regimens is unclear. We hypothesized that such patients comprise a higher-risk cohort, facing inferior response rates and outcomes using standard salvage regimens. We undertook a collaborative study to assess response rates and survival among pts failing EPOCH for aggressive B-NHL, to inform patient management and design of clinical trials in this setting. Methods Pharmacy records and institutional databases were queried, identifying pts receiving EPOCH over the last 10 years at the University of Washington/SCCA and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, for combined analysis. Under IRB approval, patient characteristics, histology, outcome with EPOCH, time to EPOCH failure, response to salvage, and overall survival were analyzed. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, B-cell-lymphoma unclassifiable, HIV-associated B cell lymphoma, and transformed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included. Pts receiving <2 cycles EPOCH, or who had inadequate follow-up (<3 months), were excluded. Failure of EPOCH was defined as failure to respond or progression during therapy, need for initiation of salvage therapy, or death during therapy of any cause. Adverse events or treatment change due to toxicity were not included in the definition of failure. JMP 11 was used to generate kaplan-meier survival estimates. Results 124 pts with aggressive B-NHL receiving EPOCH were identified. 54 had not relapsed, and among 70 remaining da-EPOCH failures, 37 met the above inclusion criteria. Median age was 55. 27% were female, and 23 received EPOCH as first-line therapy. All but 3 received rituximab with EPOCH. Histologies were primarily DLBCL in 22/37 (60%) and BCL-U in 12/37 (32%) carrying a MYC translocation; most of these harbored additional translocations in BCL2 and/or BCL6 (10/12). However, data regarding MYC rearrangement was not available for all pts. 2 had HIV-associated B-NHL and 3 had PMBCL. With 18 months follow up, the median time to EPOCH failure was 5 months. Only 3 EPOCH failures occurred late (>12 months). Median OS from the date of EPOCH failure was 10 months (Figure 1). Those receiving EPOCH as first-line therapy (23) had a median OS of 14 months from EPOCH failure, as opposed to 4 months for those receiving EPOCH as salvage therapy (log-rank p=.01). Salvage chemotherapy regimens after EPOCH were diverse, and generally ineffective; 6/28 (21%) regimens produced a response (Table 1). Among patients failing EPOCH within a year, platinum-containing salvage (RICE/RDHAP) was effective in only 2/13 patients (15%). 9 patients did not receive any salvage, most of whom died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice care. Conclusions A relatively low overall response rate (21%) was observed in this retrospective analysis of patients failing EPOCH. Analogous to early RCHOP failure in the CORAL study, those failing EPOCH within a year may face inferior outcomes with platinum-based salvage therapy. While combined from two institutions, our data represent a modest sample size and require confirmation. If verified, examination of mechanisms of resistance to EPOCH, and selecting EPOCH failures for clinical trials of novel targeted therapies and transplant-based approaches, may prove critical. Table 1. Salvage Therapy for REPOCH failures Regimen: response/total number treated Notes Response to any salvage: 6/28 (21%) Some patients received more than 1 chemo salvage; responses were tabulated per regimen. RICE: 4/12 2/3 alive post transplant(1 auto 1 allo; 1 declined transplant and survived; 1 died) RDHAP: 1/6 Gemcitabine-based: 0/5 HyperCVAD (Part A and/or B): 1/5 Survivor had CNS only relapse, received regimen B and transplant 9- received no systemic treatmen; most died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent/Abbott: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioMarin: Research Funding; Piramal: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Hill:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Till:Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Molecular Characterization of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Associated to Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152636 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2402-2402

Author(s):

Roberta Sciarra ◽

Caterina Cristinelli ◽

Michele Merli ◽

Marco Lucioni ◽

Silvia Zibellini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Immune Regulation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Notch Pathway ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Fish Analysis ◽

Low Grade ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract BACKGROUND. HCV-positive DLBCL has distinct clinical and pathologic characteristics compared to its negative counterpart: patients (pts) are usually older with more frequent splenic and extranodal involvement and elevated LDH. Differently from its clinical hallmarks, the molecular landscape of this pathological entity has been scarcely outlined. METHODS. In this bicentric study, we investigated the clinical and molecular features and outcome of 54 pts with HCV-positive DLBCL. Targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue biopsies. A core panel probes covering coding exons from 184 genes frequently mutated in mature B cell neoplasms was designed using IDT tool and libraries were prepared using Illumina DNA-prep-with enrichment. Sequencing was performed on Illumina HiSeq 2500. Cluster analysis was performed using LymphGen tool. We also applied fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC, BCL2 and BCL6. RESULTS. Median age was 71 (33-84; IQR: 61.9-77). Stage was III/IV in 34 pts (63%). Extranodal sites were involved in 21 pts (38%), spleen in 20 pts (37%). LDH was higher than the upper limit in 40 pts (74%). R-IPI was good for 2 pts (4%), intermediate for 24 pts (44%), poor for 28 pts (52%). HPS score was intermediate or high in 33 of 44 assessed pts (75%). A histological low-grade component was identified in 15 pts (27%). Hans algorithm differentiated pts almost equally in GCB (26/50, 52%) and non-GCB (24/50, 48%) subtype. HCV-RNA was detectable in 52 pts (96%) and quantifiable in 43 pts (79%). Of 29 pts assessed, genotype was 1 in 9 (31%), 2 in 16 (55%), 3 in 4 pts (14%). Among 37 pts whose data were available, 11 pts (30%) received direct antiviral agents, 7 pts (19%) received interferon-containing regimen, 19 pts (51%) were not treated for HCV. Twenty-seven pts (50%) received rituximab-enriched protocols, 23 pts (43%) were treated with chemotherapy alone, 1 pt (2%) with surgery alone, 3 pts (5%) were lost to follow up. With a median follow up of 7.7 years (yrs) (IQR: 4.6-10.6), 5-yrs overall survival (OS) (95%CI) was 49.3% (34.1-62.8%) and 5-yrs progression free survival (PFS) (95%CI) was 39.5% (25.5-53.3%). Median OS and PFS were 4.9 and 3.1 yrs, respectively. FISH analysis showed lack of BCL2 (0/19) and MYC translocations (0/15). BCL6 fusions were found in 76% of pts (16/21). NGS showed mutations in 154 of the 184 analyzed genes. The informativity of the panel was 100% with all pts presenting at least one oncogenic variant. Gene mutation frequencies are presented in Fig. 1. The median mutation load (MML) was 13 mutated genes per case (2-32; IQR: 9-16). Most frequently mutated genes were the epigenetic regulators KMT2D, mutated in 23 pts (42.6%), and SETD1B, mutated in 17 pts (31.5%). FAS, PM1 and RERE were mutated in 15 pts each (27.8%). TBL1XR1, BCL11A and SGK1 were mutated in 14 (26%), 13 (24%) and 12 pts (22%), respectively. Considering genes in their specific pathway, 94% of pts harbored mutations in genes involved in epigenetic regulation (MML: 3; range 1-7; IQR: 1.25-4), 90% of pts in apoptosis-related genes (MML: 2; 1-7; IQR: 1-3) and 77% of pts in genes belonging to BCR/NFkB signaling pathway (MML: 2; 1-7; IQR: 1-3). Of note, 56% of pts carried mutations in genes related to immune regulation (MML: 1.7; 1-5; IQR: 1-2) and 25% of pts had mutations within the NOTCH pathway (MML: 1.2; range 1-2). Via the LymphGen 1.0 tool, we classified 26 pts (48%) into 4 genetic clusters: BN2 (11/26, 42%), ST2 (8/26, 31%), MCD (4/26, 15%), EZB (3/26, 12%). Twenty-eight pts (52%) were classified as "others". Among those belonging to BN2 cluster, 7 pts (64%) had a histologically confirmed transformed DLBCL. No significant differences in terms of OS and PFS were identified according to cluster subgroups. CONCLUSIONS. The prevalence of the BN2 cluster and enrichment of mutations of genes involved in NOTCH pathway seem to indicate a preferential marginal-zone origin in HCV-positive DLBCL. In addition, our data confirm the absence of BCL2 translocation in this subset of DLBCL and show a high prevalence of mutated genes within the epigenetic and immune regulation pathways in HCV-positive DLBCL, pointing out their compelling role in the pathogenesis and suggesting potential implications for molecularly targeted therapies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Passamonti: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Arcaini: Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Bayer, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Sandoz, Janssen-Cilag, VERASTEM: Consultancy; Celgene, Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Gilead: Other: Travel expenses.

Download Full-text

Lymphoma during Pregnancy: A Multicentre Study By the Australasian Lymphoma Alliance

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150538 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 882-882

Author(s):

Pietro R Di Ciaccio ◽

Belinda Campbell ◽

Kylie D Mason ◽

Mohamed Shanavas ◽

Matthew Greenwood ◽

...

Keyword(s):

New Zealand ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

First Trimester ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

In Pregnancy

Abstract Introduction Lymphoma complicates approximately 1/6000 pregnancies (Pereg, Haematologica 2007), and presents challenges for the patient, her family, and medical professionals. This rare event raises unique therapeutic, social and ethical issues, with the welfare of both mother and unborn child to consider. There are challenges regarding symptom obfuscation, diagnosis delays and treatment delivery. In this retrospective study, we aimed to describe the experience, treatment patterns and outcomes of lymphoma in pregnancy in Australia and New Zealand. Methods We identified patients aged ≥18 diagnosed with lymphoma in pregnancy between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2020 , across 11 institutions in Australia and New Zealand. We defined "lymphoma in pregnancy" as diagnoses occurring during pregnancy (antenatal cases) or the first 12 months after delivery (postpartum cases). Postpartum cases were included to account for the phenomenon of diagnostic delay during gestation due to deferral of diagnostic investigations and symptom obfuscation (de Haan, Lancet Oncol 2018). Overall survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods from the date of diagnosis to death, with patients alive and lost to follow-up censored on the last day of follow-up. Results We identified 63 patients, 34 diagnosed antepartum and 29 diagnosed postpartum (Table 1). The most common diagnoses were classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (35), followed by diffuse large B cell lymphoma (11) and primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (6). The median age was 32 (range 23-42) years. Women diagnosed antepartum were more likely to be nulliparous (p=0.004). Of the postpartum cases, symptoms of malignancy first appeared during pregnancy in 24%. At diagnosis, 44% had advanced stage disease. 60% of women had PET as part of baseline staging, however only 8% underwent PET whilst pregnant, all during the second or third trimester. 83% of HL patients had adverse risk factors (mediastinal bulk >1/3 diameter, ESR>50mm/hr, >2 sites). ESR alone, which may be elevated physiologically in pregnancy, was the sole adverse risk factor for 9% of HL patients. Median days between diagnosis and treatment initiation were 14 (IQR 8-30) for antenatal patients and 21 (IQR 7-40) for postnatal. 19% of the antenatal cohort with aggressive lymphoma had treatment deferred/delayed explicitly due to pregnancy. The majority (89%) of antenatal patients were treated with ABVD (HL) or (R)CHOP/(R)EPOCH (NHL) whilst pregnant. 3 patients received first-line treatment divergent from standard (vinblastine for HL, interferon for indolent B-NHL and surgery for primary cutaneous ALCL). 37% received radiotherapy, although only 1 patient received it antenatally. Median follow up was 34 months. 5 year OS for HL was 83% (95%CI 54%-95%) and for DLBCL 74% (95%CI 30%-93%)(Figure 1). Seven patients died (4 from lymphoma, 2 treatment-related infection, 1 unknown). Discussion of elective termination of pregnancy was documented in 24 of 34 antenatal diagnoses, advised in 3 and performed in 2, both in the first trimester. Only 31 (49%) of 63 women had documented evidence of counselling regarding future fertility strategies. Of the 48 patients with available data, there were 45 live births, 2 elective terminations and 1 spontaneous abortion in the first trimester. The mean gestation at birth was significantly earlier and marginally preterm for antenatal diagnoses (mean 35.6wk v 38.2wk, p=0.002). 6 neonates (11%) were small for gestational age, 5 of whom were born to mothers diagnosed antenatally. 29% of neonates were admitted to neonatal intensive care or special care units. There were no cases of neonatal neutropenia, one case of sepsis of prematurity and one case of PJP infection in a term baby. Conclusion Lymphoma in pregnancy is rare and lacks a harmonised approach. We present a large multicentre cohort reflecting contemporary practice. Although standard therapy could be provided to most patients, delays in treatment and diagnosis were common, and most antenatally-diagnosed women did not receive optimal staging. Neonates in the antenatally-diagnosed group were more likely to be premature, however there are likely a number of confounders and causality cannot be presumed. There were no neonatal deaths. It is imperative to continue to report on data regarding lymphoma in pregnancy to inform optimal care in this setting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Greenwood: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gregory: Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel fees, Speakers Bureau. Hamad: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Prefmab: Final Analysis of Patient Preference for Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Rituximab in Previously Untreated CD20+ Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Follicular Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3972.3972 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3972-3972 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Mathias Rummel ◽

Tae Min Kim ◽

Caterina Plenteda ◽

Enrico Capochiani ◽

Maria Mendoza ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Patient Preference ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Large B Cell

Abstract Background Rituximab in combination with chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). To improve patient convenience and to reduce healthcare resource burden, a subcutaneous (SC) formulation of rituximab has been developed and has been shown to be clinically comparable to intravenous (IV) rituximab. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient preference for rituximab IV or SC administration. Methods Prefmab (NCT01724021) is a randomized, open-label, crossover phase IIIb study. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 to ≤80 years with previously untreated CD20+ DLBCL (IPI 1-4 or 0 with bulky disease) or FL (FLIPI grade 1-3a), at least 1 bidimensionally measureable lesion ≥1.5cm at its largest dimension by computed tomography, and an ECOG performance status ≤3; all provided written informed consent. Patients received 8 cycles of rituximab according to 2 schedules: Arm A received 1 cycle of rituximab IV (375mg/m2) and 3 cycles of rituximab SC (1400mg) then 4 cycles of rituximab IV; Arm B received 4 cycles of rituximab IV (375mg/m2) then 4 cycles of rituximab SC (1400mg). Alongside rituximab, both arms received 6-8 cycles of chemotherapy (CHOP [cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, oncovin, prednisone], CVP [cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone], or bendamustine as per standard local practice). A Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPQ) was conducted post-rituximab therapy at cycles 6 and 8. The primary endpoint was overall preference for rituximab IV or SC. The strength of patient preference was also assessed (very strong, fairly strong, or not very strong). Adverse events (AEs), including administration-related reactions, were evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Results At the primary data cut-off (January 19, 2015), the intent-to-treat population comprised 743 patients (Arm A: n=372; Arm B: n=371). The majority of patients had DLBCL (63%). The median age was 60 years (range 18-80) and baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. One hundred and twenty patients discontinued immunochemotherapy treatment prematurely, primarily due to AEs (n=52), but entered follow-up. A further 108 patients (Arm A: n=48; Arm B: n=60) discontinued the study and did not complete follow-up, primarily due to death (53 patients [DLBCL: n=48; FL: n=5], 19 of whom died due to progressive disease [DLBCL: n=16; FL: n=3]), patient request/withdrawal of consent (n=23), or AEs (n=9). Rates of study discontinuation and treatment discontinuation were balanced between arms. The PPQ was completed by 620 patients at cycle 6 and 591 at cycle 8. At cycle 6, rituximab SC was preferred by 80% (n=495) of patients (Arm A: 79%; Arm B: 81%) and rituximab IV by 10% (n=62; Arm A: 11%; Arm B: 9%), while 10% (n=63) had no preference (Arm A: 10%; Arm B: 10%). At cycle 8, the respective values were 81% (n=477; Arm A: 77%; Arm B: 84%), 11% (n=66; Arm A: 13%; Arm B: 10%), and 8% (n=48; Arm A: 10%; Arm B: 6%). The strength of patient preference for rituximab SC or IV is shown in Figure 1. Of patients who preferred rituximab SC, the main reasons were 'less time in the clinic' (cycle 6: 68%; cycle 8: 69%) and 'feels more comfortable during administration' (cycle 6: 37%; cycle 8: 37%). The mean cumulative rituximab administration time (mean ± standard deviation) was 865 ± 401 min for rituximab IV compared with 37 ± 100 min for rituximab SC. AEs were generally balanced between rituximab IV and SC administration, with the exception of gastrointestinal disorders (IV: 55%; SC: 31%) in patients with FL, notably nausea (IV: 28%; SC: 11%), constipation (IV: 14%; SC: 6%), and vomiting (IV 12%; SC 2%). No new safety signals were detected. Conclusions Most previously untreated patients with CD20+ DLBCL or FL preferred SC compared with IV administration of rituximab, mainly due to reduction in the duration and discomfort of administration. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Rummel: Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Plenteda:Roche: Other: Sub-investigator. Mendoza:Roche: Employment. Smith:Roche: Employment. Osborne:Roche: Employment. Grigg:Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Trial in Progress: A Multicentre, Parallel Arm, Open-Label Trial of Frontline R-CHOP/Polatuzumab Vedotin-RCHP and Glofitamab in Younger Patients with Higher Risk Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (COALITION)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147636 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3571-3571

Author(s):

Adrian Minson ◽

Nada Hamad ◽

Costas K. Yannakou ◽

Shu Min Wong ◽

Jason P Butler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Response Rates ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Front Line ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: R-CHOP remains a standard frontline treatment for patients with DLBCL and high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL). A significant proportion of patients will have refractory disease or subsequently relapse, particularly those with high-risk features such as an elevated IPI score or rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 (double/triple hit (DH/TH)). This population remains in need of improved induction treatments that can reduce the requirement for subsequent therapies which are associated with significant toxicities and diminishing response rates. Rationale: Glofitamab is a novel full-length bispecific antibody with a unique 2:1 configuration (two CD20 binding domains and one CD3 binding domain). In combination with a single pre-dose of obinutuzumab, glofitamab has demonstrated >70% complete remission in aggressive B-cell lymphoma at the recommended target dose in a phase 1 trial (Carlo-Stella, EHA 2021). Pre-clinical studies suggest that glofitamab's activity is retained in the presence of concomitant cytotoxic and CD20 antibody therapies, making it an attractive agent for combination with R-CHOP-like induction. Polatuzumab vedotin (pola) is an antibody-drug conjugate approved for R/R DLBCL in combination with BR, and is currently in evaluation for the front-line treatment of DLBCL in combination with RCHP in a randomised trial. The safety and preliminary efficacy of glofitamab in combination with R-CHOP, or pola-RCHP as a front-line treatment for high risk DLBCL is being evaluated. Study Design and Methods: This is a parallel-arm phase Ib/II trial. Treatment consists of an initial cycle of R-CHOP, followed by 5 cycles of combination induction treatment and 2 cycles of consolidation glofitamab monotherapy. Key inclusion criteria are: age 18-65 years, a diagnosis of DLBCL or HBGL, high-risk features (IPI ≥3 or NCCN-IPI ≥4 or presence of DH/TH), treatment naïve or after 1 cycle of R-CHOP, ECOG 0-3. The primary endpoint is the safety of the combination and secondary endpoints include complete response rates at interim and end of treatment FDG-PET assessments by Lugano criteria, progression free survival and overall survival. Correlative studies assessing baseline immunologic profiles, tumour phenotype and potential resistance mechanisms are planned. Approximately 40 patients will be treated in each arm across 12-14 Australian sites. The trial commenced recruitment in July 2021 (NCT04914741). The ability to recruit prior to either cycle 1 or cycle 2 allows seamless cross-referral from non-trial sites. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Minson: Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hamad: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Seymour: AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sunesis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mei Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Dickinson: Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Outcomes and Factors Impacting Use of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Refractory and Relapsed Large B-Cell Lymphoma: An Intent-to-Treat Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127087 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4452-4452 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Agrima Mian ◽

Wei Wei ◽

Allison M. Winter ◽

Jack Khouri ◽

Deepa Jagadeesh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Car T ◽

Ecog Ps ◽

Aggressive B Cell Lymphoma

Background: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-cel), the first chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T), is approved for refractory/relapsed (R/R) aggressive B-cell lymphoma with the ZUMA-1 trial reporting an objective response in 83% and complete response in 58% patients at a median duration of 27 months (Locke et al. 2019). The availability to successfully deliver CAR-T therapy may be restricted by socio-economic, technical/manufacturing challenges and comorbidities related to aggressive B-cell lymphoma and its treatment. In this intent-to treat (ITT) analysis, we compared the outcomes of patients at our center with R/R B-cell lymphoma who received Axi-cel with those for whom Axi-cel therapy was intended but not administered, in order to identify factors that may limit its use in this population. Methods: We reviewed medical records of consecutive adult patients with R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), transformed follicular lymphoma (tFL) and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) for whom letters of medical necessity (LMN) were sent to request approval for Axi-cel, from March 2018 to May 2019 at our center. Patients were grouped according to whether or not they ultimately received Axi-cel. Baseline characteristics between Axi-cel and Non-Axi-cel group were compared using Fischer's exact test for categorical and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Comorbidities were assessed using the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) (Sorror 2013). Time-dependent outcomes were calculated from the date of LMN. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: LMNs were sent for a total of 38 patients, 27 male (71%) with a median age of 63 (range, 25-77) years. 24 patients (63%) had an ECOG PS of 0 or 1 at study entry, while median IPI at diagnosis was 2 (range, 0-5). The most common histology was DLBCL in 25 patients (66%) and 18 (47%) had a germinal center B-cell (GCB) subtype. Four patients had double/triple hit lymphoma. The median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 2-6) and 21 patients (55%) underwent prior autologous transplant. Forty-seven percent had relapsed and 53% had refractory disease. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Twenty seven (71%) patients received Axi-cel, while 11 patients (29%) were considered candidates for but could not receive Axi-cel. The median time from LMN to cell infusion was 62 (range, 33-248) days. A higher HCT-CI score was observed in the Non-Axi-cel group as compared to the Axi-cel group (median score of 4 vs 2, P=0.04). The two groups did not differ with respect to age, ECOG PS, IPI, number of prior therapies or transplant status. Median follow- up was 5 (range, 2-16) months. At the time of last follow-up, 8 out of 27 patients (30%) in the Axi-cel and 10 out of 11 (91%) in the Non-Axi-cel group had died. The median OS for the entire cohort was 10 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 13), Axi-cel group was 13 months (95% CI, 7.7 to N.R.) and Non-Axi-cel group was 1 month (95% CI, 0.4 to 3.7) (Figure 1). In the Non-Axi-cel group, 3 patients underwent leukapheresis but died prior to infusion (including 1 manufacturing failure and 2 patients with rapid systemic progression). The other 7 deaths in this group were prior to leukapheresis (3 due to sepsis, 3 due to rapid progression including 1 case of active CNS disease and 1 patient could not receive therapy due to caregiver and financial barriers). The one surviving patient in the Non-Axi-cel group had refractory CNS relapse at the time of last follow-up. Conclusions: In this retrospective ITT analysis, approximately one third of patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma for whom CAR-T therapy was intended were unable to receive it and had extremely short median OS. Patients who could not receive Axi-cel had a higher comorbidity index at the time of decision to proceed with CAR-T therapy; the majority of them died before leukapheresis from disease progression or complications of prior treatment. Improved strategies are needed to safely bridge patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma intended to receive Axi-cel. New targeted agents such as polatuzumab vedotin and tafasitamab (formerly MOR208) may increase the proportion of patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma who ultimately receive and benefit from CAR-T therapy. Disclosures Anwer: Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; In-Cyte: Speakers Bureau. Gerds:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Imago Biosciences: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding. Majhail:Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Atara Bio: Consultancy; Nkarta: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Honoraria. Hill:TG therapeutics: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celegene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 2 Randomized Trial Comparing Standard RCHOP Versus Brcap (bortezomib, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and prednisone) As First Line Treatment in Young Patients with High-Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). a Study from Spanish Group Geltamo

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4201.4201 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4201-4201 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Eva González-Barca ◽

Estrella Carrillo-Cruz ◽

Carlos Grande ◽

Alejandro Martín ◽

Mónica Coronado ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Salvage Therapy ◽

Preliminary Analysis ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Series Data ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: Survival of DLBCL patients with high IPI treated with RCHOP immunochemotherapy is poor. In this population, the combination of RCHOP with new drugs is an attractive approach, along with performing an evaluation with PET/CT after 2 to 4 cycles to change the therapy if an early complete response is not achieved. Methods : We performed a clinical trial comparing 6 cycles of RCHOP vs 6 cycles of BRCAP, a modified RCHOP regimen changing vincristine by bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 sc days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21-day cycle. Pre-phase therapy was permitted for patients who could not wait the results of the screening procedures to start therapy due to the aggressiveness of the disease. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01848132). Patients younger than 71 yrs diagnosed with DLBCL and an age-adjusted IPI (aaIPI) 2-3 or aaIPI 1 with increased beta2microglobulin were eligible. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who survives free of event at 2 years. Centralized anatomopathology review was performed in all cases; samples were classified as germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) vs non-GCB subtypes by immunohistochemistry according to the Hans algorithm. PET/CTs were performed baseline, after 2, 4 and 6 cycles (PET2, PET4, and PET6), and were reviewed at real time by at least 3 experts of a central panel. Response at the end of therapy was analyzed following the visual method with the Deauville scale, and response after PET2 and PET4 was evaluated using the semiquantitative method. Persistent disease at PET4 was considered as failure of therapy and these patients were removed from trial treatment. EFS was calculated from diagnosis until event defined as death from any cause, relapse, progression or need of salvage therapy (defined as PET4 or PET6 positive). Overall survival (OS) was calculated from diagnosis until death for any cause. We present here a preliminary analysis of results. Results: One hundred and twenty-one patients were included; data on 113 are presented (diagnosis not confirmed in 6, data missing in 2). Median age was 57.1 yrs (range 23-70), 57 (50.4%) were males. Characteristics at diagnosis were: non-GCB subtype 32/87 (36.8%), immunohistochemical co-expression of myc/bcl2 56/82 (77.8%), stage III-IV 107 (94.7%), ≥2 extranodal locations 55/76 (72.5%), ECOG 2-3 36 (32.1%), increased LDH 88 (77.9%), increased beta 2 microglobulin 73 (64.6%), aaIPI 3: 32 (28.3%). No differences were found between treatment arms. Fifty-five patients were treated in the experimental arm (EA) and 58 in the control arm (CA). Twenty-eight (28.3%) out of 99 patients required of pre-phase treatment. The mean relative dose intensity for bortezomib was 88.3%. Data about the most frequent toxicity are shown in table 1. Twenty-nine (30.2%) out of 96 patients who have finished 4 cycles had a positive PET4 according to central review and were withdrawn to receive salvage therapy. Complete remission (CR) at the end of therapy (PET4-/PET6-) was observed in 44 (45.8%) patients. After a median follow-up of 9 months, estimated 12-mo EFS was 36.6%, and 12-mo OS was 82.9% in the whole series. Data of the subgroup analysis according the immunohistochemistry subtypes by Hans algorithm are show in table 2. Conclusions: In the present preliminary analysis, no significant differences were found between RCHOP and BRCAP in terms of CR and EFS in this very high-risk population of young DLBCL patients. However, in the subgroup analysis of patients with non-GCB disease, we found a significantly better CR rate in patients treated with BRCAP. A longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the real impact of this therapy on survival. Disclosures González-Barca: Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria. Martín:Sevier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sancho:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion, Inc: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. López-Jiménez:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Velgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MundiPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. López-Guillermo:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MundiPharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ramírez:Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Conde:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Short-Course Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Immunodeficiency-Associated Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124081 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5355-5355

Author(s):

Rami Alsharif ◽

Samah Nassereddine ◽

Esma Akin ◽

Donald Karcher ◽

Mitchell Smith ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Failure ◽

Chronic Renal Failure ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Hiv Positive ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Interim Pet ◽

Short Course

Background: While six cycles of chemotherapy is the standard curative approach in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), patients with immunodeficiencies and/or organ compromise may experience significant toxicity with this duration of therapy. Hence, balancing the competing needs of optimal aggressive lymphoma therapy with tolerable treatment-related toxicity is a challenge in this population. Previously, abbreviated therapy with short-course etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and dose-dense rituximab (SC-EPOCH-RR) - where most patients received 3 cycles of therapy - demonstrated high efficacy in HIV-associated DLBCL (Dunleavy et al. Blood 2010; 115:3017-24). 79% of patients received 3 cycles of therapy and overall 91% of patients achieved a complete response (CR). Here we retrospectively evaluate the outcome of patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL who had an underlying immunodeficiency and/or chronic renal failure and received SC-EPOCH-RR at our institution. Methods: We included patients who had a new diagnosis of DLBCL (including primary effusion lymphoma (PEL)) associated with immunodeficiency (HIV or post-organ transplant) and/or chronic renal failure. Therapy consisted of SC-EPOCH-RR (R was omitted in the patient with PEL) with intrathecal prophylaxis (as previously described). A total of three to four cycles of therapy was planned if an interim FDG-PET (following 2 cycles) was negative by Deauville criteria. A Deauville score of 1-3 was considered negative and 4-5 positive. In patients who were HIV positive, anti-retroviral therapy (ART) was continued as long as there were no significant ART-chemotherapy interactions. Results: Characteristics of 7 included patients are as follows: median age 43 (25-75); 5 (71%) were male; 6 (85.7%) had stage 3 or 4 disease; 6 (85.7%) had elevated LDH at diagnosis; 5(71.4%) had an International Prognostic index (IPI) score of 3-5; 5 (71%) were HIV positive and 3 (43%) had chronic renal failure (including 1 patient on chronic immunosuppression post-renal transplant for granulomatosis with polyangiitis). All had a diagnosis of DLBCL, 4 who were GCB and 2 non-GCB by the Hans algorithm, while 1 had extra-cavitary PEL. Two patients had c-MYC rearrangements by FISH. For HIV positive patients, the median CD4 count at diagnosis was 266 (32-292). No patient had CNS disease. All patients received 3 (4 patients) or 4 (3 patients) cycles of therapy. Responses were CR in all patients as assessed by end of therapy (EOT) FDG-PET. All patients had a negative interim PET by Deauville criteria (scores 1-3). One patient with HIV-associated DLBCL (CD4 count 32 at diagnosis and non-GCB subtype by immunohistochemistry) relapsed with CNS disease 4 weeks after achieving a negative EOT-PET and died from disease progression several weeks later. All other patients (6/7) are progression-free with a median follow-up time of 6 months. Conclusions: Albeit small numbers and short follow-up in our series, in a 'real-world' setting, abbreviated therapy was highly effective in patients with immunodeficiency-related DLBCL and/or in the setting of chronic renal failure. Using an interim PET guided approach, 3-4 cycles of therapy is highly effective and importantly limits toxicity in this population. Though the series was not large enough to accurately identify poor prognostic clinical and tumor factors, the patient with progression had a non-GCB tumor and was severely immunosuppressed, characteristics previously shown to be associated with adverse outcomes in this population. We continue to expand our series and follow-up. Additional studies are needed evaluating abbreviated therapy (SC-EPOCH-RR) in immunosuppressed and organ-compromised patients with aggressive B cell lymphomas for whom there is a paucity of experience and toxicity concerns limit delivery of standard, potentially curative therapy. Disclosures Smith: EUSA: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astra-Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Dunleavy:Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Describing Treatment of Primary Mediastinal Large B Cell Lymphoma Using Rigorously Defined Molecular Classification: A Retrospective Analysis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-143171 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 35-36

Author(s):

Carla Casulo ◽

Myla Strawderman ◽

Raphael Steiner ◽

Carolyne Delage ◽

Tina Faugh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Molecular Features ◽

Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Large B Cell

Introduction Primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma (PMBCL) is a rare non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with a female predominance; often presenting with a large anterior mediastinal mass. Though PMBCL has clinical and molecular features overlapping with Hodgkin lymphoma, it is a distinct entity defined by the World Health Organization classification. PMBCL is heterogeneously treated, and most patients receive front line therapy with either rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) with radiotherapy (RT), or the more intensive etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin with rituximab (EPOCH-R) regimen. Diagnosis of PMBCL is made using clinicopathologic criteria and radiographic imaging, however gene expression profiling (GEP) studies reveal a characteristic genotypic signature distinct from diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Molecular classification of PMBCL using the Lymph3Cx assay from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE) is feasible, reproducible, and highly concordant in a training and validation cohort (Mottok et al. Blood 2018). Using a multicenter cohort of patients, we sought to estimate the rate of mis-match among patients with a clinical diagnosis of PMBCL using Lymph3Cx, and describe treatment selections and outcomes for each group. Methods Patients were identified from a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed NHL from the University of Iowa and Mayo Clinic Molecular Epidemiology Resource, and the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes cohort. Patients were enrolled between 2002-2019, and included if they had clinically defined PMBCL. FFPE was retrieved from hematopathology archives of participating academic centers. All diagnoses of PMBCL were based on expert hematopathology review at the time of therapy, and all cases underwent classification by GEP using the Lymph3Cx assay. Lymph3Cx was performed in the clinical lab at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona: Contiguous unstained sections were deparaffinized and macrodissected to enrich for tumor content before RNA isolation;100-200 ng of total RNA was used in an nCounter Elements XT, hybridized, and processed the following day using the nCounter FLEX system. Raw counts were processed through the Lymph3Cx algorithm and results reported as probability of PMBCL (≥0.90 as PMBCL, ≤0.10 as DLBCL all other results "Unclear PMBCL/DLBCL") (A. Mottok et al, Blood, 2018). For cases classified as DLBCL, the Lymph2Cx cell-of-origin classifier results was reported (Scott et al, JCO, 2016). Time to event endpoints were described with Kaplan-Meier plots by groups defined by mismatch status and compared with a logrank test. Binary outcomes will be presented with 90% exact confidence intervals. Results Fifty patients were identified. Median age was 35 years (range 19-70). Sixty four percent were women. Median follow up was 47 months. Treatments included R-CHOP (44%), EPOCH-R (44%), and MACOP-B [methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin] (6%), other (4%). Ten patients (20%) had events (defined as progression or death). Three patients in the entire cohort (6%) died. The Kaplan-Meier estimated survival at 47 months (median follow-up) is 92%. The Lymph3Cx assay yielded gene expression data of sufficient quality in 47/50 cases (94%, 90% CI=85.2, 98.3%). Of 47 cases clinically identified as PMBCL, 5 unclear were DLBCL/PMBCL and 1 was Germinal Center B cell subtype of DLBCL. Among these 6 patients, 4 received R-EPOCH (66%), 1 received R-CHOP (16.6%). One patient had missing treatment data. One patient had an event requiring subsequent therapy; all patients remain alive. Conclusions Using 47 patients with PMBCL defined by histology, clinical and radiographic findings, and molecular features, we demonstrate high concordance between clinical phenotype and molecular genotype of PMBCL by Lymph3Cx. Among the 6 patients not classified as PMBCL, most received R-EPOCH. Differences in outcome by mis-match status await longer follow-up and further accrual of subjects to our data base. Our data suggest molecular genotyping may have a role in mediastinal presentations of large cell lymphoma to optimize treatment decision making. Disclosures Maurer: Nanostring: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene / BMS: Research Funding; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cerhan:BMS/Celgene: Research Funding; NanoString: Research Funding. Flowers:AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Burroughs Wellcome Fund: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo Biopharma: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Research Funding; V Foundation: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; National Cancer Institute: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; OptumRx: Consultancy; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Consultancy. Friedberg:Acerta Pharma - A member of the AstraZeneca Group, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals.: Other; Astellas: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Roche: Other: Travel expenses; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Download Full-text