Racial and Age-Related Differences in Impacts of High-Risk Cytogenetic Abnormalities on Survival in Multiple Myeloma in a Nationwide Electronic Health Record-Derived Database

Abstract Background: The incidence of multiple myeloma (MM) and enrichment of cytogenetic abnormalities differ significantly between racial/ethnic groups in the US, and their significance in determining myeloma progression and survival is not well understood. Whole genome sequencing has identified unique mutational signatures in MM, including an age-related process common in hyperdiploid myeloma. Our purpose was to describe racial and age-related differences in the impact of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) on survival in MM. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult MM patients starting first-line therapy between January 2011 and May 2021 using the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database. Patient-level demographic and clinical characteristics were ascertained using structured and unstructured data, curated via technology-enabled abstraction. Patients who had documented fluorescence in situ hybridization testing within 30 days prior to or 90 days following the start of first-line treatment were included. HRCAs, including gain or amplification 1q21, deletion 17p, t(4;14), t(14;16) and t(14;20), were identified and categorized as 0, 1, or 2+ HRCAs. Our outcomes of interest were real world progression free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (rwOS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics and treatment including time-dependent receipt of autologous stem cell transplantation. Results: From a cohort of 4889 MM patients, there were 790 (16%) Black and 2995 (61%) White patients with median ages at diagnosis of 68 and 70 years, respectively. Compared to White patients, a higher proportion of Black patients had IgG M-protein (61% vs 55%) and a lower proportion had 1+ HRCAs identified (31% vs 34%). Among all racial groups, compared to patients aged <65 years (N=1771), a higher proportion of patients aged 65+ years (N=3118) had IgA M-protein (21% vs 17%) and 1+ HRCAs identified (35% vs 33%). Multivariable models showed evidence of significant statistical interaction between age and prevalence of HRCA for rwPFS (P-int: 0.02). Among White patients, having 2+ HRCAs ("double-hit MM") compared to no HRCAs was associated with worse rwPFS in both younger and older patients (<65 years: HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.93-4.32, P<0.01; 65+ years: HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.18-1.94, P<0.01). Among Black patients, associations between double-hit MM and rwPFS were attenuated and not statistically significant regardless of age (<65 years: HR 1.81, 95% CI 0.69-4.74, P=0.23; 65+ years: HR 1.61, 95% CI 0.92-2.81, P=0.09). Similarly, we also found evidence of statistical interaction between age and prevalence of HRCA for rwOS (P-int: 0.02). Among White patients, double-hit MM was significantly associated with worse rwOS but the magnitude of increased risk differed for younger (HR 3.39, 95% CI 2.24-5.14, P<0.01) and older (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.27-2.05, P<0.01) patients. Double-hit MM was significantly associated with worse rwOS among older Black patients (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.03-3.06, P=0.04), but not younger Black patients (HR 1.60, 95% CI 0.58-4.40, P=0.36). Conclusions: In this cohort of newly diagnosed MM patients treated in routine practice, having double-hit MM was differentially predictive of poor survival across age groups. Double-hit MM was associated with worse rwPFS and rwOS among White patients, but these trends were less consistent among Black patients. Our current understanding of cytogenetic risk stratification of MM requires further study and additional data for identifying low- and high-risk subsets of patients across different ages and racial groups. Figure. Kaplan-Meier survivor functions for rwPFS in White (Panel A) and Black (Panel B) patients by age group and number of HRCAs Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Calip: Flatiron Health: Current Employment; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pfizer: Research Funding. Ascha: Flatiron Health: Current Employment; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wang: Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Flatiron Health: Current Employment. Pierre: Flatiron Health, Inc: Current Employment; Roche: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Maignan: Flatiron Health: Current Employment; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wadé: Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Flatiron Health: Current Employment. Leng: Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Flatiron Health: Current Employment. Seymour: Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment. Patel: Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Neparidze: Eidos Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Racial Disparities in Telemedicine Uptake during the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Patients with Hematologic Malignancies in the United States

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153787 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1973-1973

Author(s):

Natalia Neparidze ◽

Krystal W. Lau ◽

Xiaoliang Wang ◽

Amy J. Davidoff ◽

Scott F. Huntington ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Visit Rate ◽

Black Patients ◽

Monthly Visit ◽

All Diseases ◽

Privately Held ◽

White Patients

Abstract Background/objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted healthcare visit trends, propelling healthcare systems to reduce in-person visits and hospital admissions and increasingly rely on telemedicine; whether there are differences in these trends across racial groups is unknown. This study investigated potential racial disparities in visits during the pandemic for patients with documented active treatment for hematologic malignancies. Methods: We used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database to select patients with confirmed diagnosis of AML, DLBCL, FL, MCL, CLL or MM, at least 18 years old at initial diagnosis, and documented race in the EHR as Black/African American or White were included. Patients were categorized into treatment types within lines of therapy: Orals (orals + outpatient infusions with orals) vs. Inpatient treatments (chemotherapy, hematopoietic transplants & CAR-T cell therapy). Monthly visit rates were calculated as the number of visits (telemedicine or in-person [in-clinic treatment administration, vitals, and/or labs]) per active patient per 30-day standardized month, except for months in which the patient was considered not active (e.g. no documented therapy, surveillance). We used time-series forecasting methods on pre-pandemic monthly visit rate data (March 2016 - February 2020) to estimate projected counterfactual monthly visit rates (expected rates if the pandemic did not occur) between March 2020 - February 2021 for all diseases combined, for each disease, each treatment type, and each race. Differences between projected and actual monthly visit rates during the pandemic period were considered significant and related due to the pandemic if the actual visit rate was outside of the 95% prediction interval (PI) surrounding the projected estimate. We used cross-correlation analysis to test for significant differences in visit rates between Black and White patients. Results: The analysis included 17,621 patients (2,225 Black, 15,396 White): 3,041 AML, 2,715 DLBCL, 1,558 FL, 1,511 MCL, 3,813 CLL and 5,244 MM (1,166 Black, 4078 White). Across all diseases and treatment categories, Black patients had no significant reductions in in-person visit rates throughout the pandemic period compared to the projected rates. There was, however, an 18% statistically significant reduction (95% PI 9.9% - 25%) in in-person visit rates for White patients on orals during early pandemic months (March - May 2020) from a projected visit rate of 2.0 (95% PI 1.8 - 2.2) visits per patient per month to an actual visit rate of 1.61. There was no significant reduction in in-person visit rates for White patients on inpatient treatments. Telemedicine uptake was significantly higher for White patients compared with Black patients for all diseases combined across all treatment categories (Figure A & B) (t = 9.5, p < 0.01), AML inpatient treatments (t = 2.4, p = 0.04), MM orals (Figure C) (t = 6.0, p < 0.01) and MM inpatient treatments (Figure D) (t = 2.3, p = 0.04). Conclusions: A tradeoff in reductions in in-person visits and uptake of telemedicine use was observed overall. White patients had significantly higher telemedicine uptake compared with Black patients for both oral and inpatient treatments. In-person visit rates for Black patients were unchanged regardless of treatment category. These in-person visit rates reflect documented telemedicine use disparities, which requires further study into possible compound causes, including economic and societal factors. Figure. Trends over time in telemedicine visit rates for White patients (blue line) and Black patients (black line) Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Neparidze: Eidos Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Lau: Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wang: Flatiron Health: Current Employment; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Davidoff: Amgen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Other: Family member consultancy. Huntington: Bayer: Honoraria; Servier: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Thyme Inc: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; SeaGen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Flatiron Health Inc.: Consultancy; DTRM Biopharm: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy. Calip: Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pfizer: Research Funding. Shah: AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Epizyme: Research Funding. Stephens: Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; JUNO: Research Funding; Mingsight: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arqule: Research Funding. Miksad: Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Parikh: Onc.AI: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; Humana: Honoraria, Research Funding; Flatiron Health Inc: Honoraria; Thyme Care: Honoraria; Nanology: Honoraria; GNS Healthcare: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Takvorian: Genentech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding. Seymour: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Flatiron Health Inc: Current Employment; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1a/b Dose Escalation Study of the MYC Repressor Apto-253 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory AML or High-Risk MDS

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150049 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3411-3411

Author(s):

Maro Ohanian ◽

Martha L. Arellano ◽

Moshe Y. Levy ◽

Kristen O'Dwyer ◽

Hani Babiker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

High Risk ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Refractory Aml

Abstract INTRODUCTION: APTO-253 represses expression of the MYC oncogene by targeting a conserved G-quadruplex structure in its promoter, down-regulates MYC mRNA and protein levels and induces apoptosis in AML cell lines and marrow samples from patients with AML, MDS, and MPN in vitro. After injection, a large fraction of APTO-253 binds iron and transforms to the Fe(253) 3 complex which retains full activity. APTO-253 has been granted orphan drug designation for AML by the US FDA and is being studied in a Phase 1a/b clinical trial in patients with relapsed or refractory AML (R/R AML) or high-risk myelodysplasias (high-risk MDS) (NCT02267863). AIMS: Primary objectives are to determine the safety and tolerability of APTO-253, MTD, dose limiting toxicities (DLT), and the RP2D. Key secondary objectives are to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, pharmacodynamic (PD) activity, and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. METHODS: Eligible patients have R/R AML or high-risk MDS for which either standard treatment has failed, is no longer effective, or can no longer be administered safely. Treatment- emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and tumor responses are evaluated using International Working Group criteria. APTO-253 is administered by IV infusion once weekly on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle; ascending dose cohorts were enrolled at a starting dose of 20 mg/m 2 with planned escalation to 403 mg/m 2. RESULTS: As of June 7, 2021, a total of 18 patients (median age 64.0 years, 16 AML and 2 high-risk MDS) with a median of 2.5 prior treatments (range of 1 - 9) have been treated with APTO-253 at doses of 20 (n=1), 40 (n=1), 66 (n=4), 100 (n=4) and 150 mg/m 2 (n=8). Most patients were RBC (87.5% of AML and 100% of MDS) and/or platelet (75% of AML and 50% MDS) transfusion-dependent. No DLTs or drug-related serious adverse events have been reported. Only 1 patient had a drug-related TEAE of grade 3 or greater (fatigue, Grade 3, probably related). Preliminary PK analysis (Figure 1) showed that serum levels of APTO-253 were dose proportional. C max and AUC 0-72h for C1D1 dosing were 0.06, 0.02, 0.36 ± 0.37, 0.44 ± 0.41 and 0.72 ± 0.70 µM and 0.11, 0.15, 3.98 ± 1.77, 4.79 ± 0.87 and 2.51 ± 1.73 µM*h for dose levels of 20, 40, 66, 100 and 150 mg/m 2, respectively. Plasma levels for Fe(253) 3 were significantly higher than those for the APTO-253 monomer. For example, C max and AUC 0-72h of Fe(253) 3 for C1D1 dosing of patients in Cohort 150 mg/m 2 were 2- and 20- fold higher than the ATPO-253 monomer at 15.09 ± 0.42 µM and 51.52 ± 28.26 µM*h, respectively. Following dosing at 150 mg/m 2, serum concentrations of Fe(253) 3 were above 0.5 µM for > 48 h, which approaches the therapeutic range based on in vitro studies. CONCLUSIONS: APTO-253 has been well-tolerated at doses of 20, 40, 66, 100 and 150 mg/m 2 over multiple cycles and escalated to 210 mg/m 2 (Cohort 6). PK analysis revealed that APTO-253 is rapidly transformed to and co-exists with the Fe(253) 3 in serum from R/R AML and high-risk MDS patients. Enrollment of patients at the 210 mg/m 2 dose level is ongoing and updated clinical data will be presented at the meeting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Arellano: KITE Pharma, Inc: Consultancy; Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy. Levy: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Other: Promotional speaker; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; Epizyme: Consultancy, Other: Promotional speaker; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; Dova: Consultancy, Other: Promotional speaker; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Promotional speaker; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Beigene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Promotional speaker, Speakers Bureau. Mahadevan: caris: Speakers Bureau; Guardanthealt: Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Other: Clinical trial Adverse events committee; TG Therapeuticals: Other: Clinical trial Adverse events committee. Zhang: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment. Rastgoo: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment. Jin: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment. Marango: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Howell: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Rice: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties; Oncolytics Biotech Inc.: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bejar: Aptose Biosciences, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Takeda: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex: Consultancy; Silence Therapeutics: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Results from a Phase 1 Study of APVO436, a Novel Anti-CD123 x Anti-CD3 Bispecific Molecule, in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141619 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 11-12

Author(s):

Justin M. Watts ◽

Tara Lin ◽

Eunice S. Wang ◽

Alice S. Mims ◽

Elizabeth H. Cull ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Cytokine Release ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Acute Myeloid

Introduction Immunotherapy offers the promise of a new paradigm for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). CD123, the IL-3 receptor alpha-chain, represents an attractive target for antibody therapies because of its high expression on AML/MDS blasts and leukemic stem cells compared to normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. APVO436, a novel bispecific anti-CD123 x anti-CD3 ADAPTIR™ molecule, depleted CD123+ cells in AML patient samples ex vivo (Godwin et al. ASH 2017), reduced leukemia engraftment in a systemic AML xenograft model (Comeau et al. AACR 2018), and transiently reduced peripheral CD123+ cells in non-human primates with minimal cytokine release and in a dose-dependent fashion (Comeau et al. AACR 2019). These data provide a basis for the clinical application of APVO436 as a treatment in AML and MDS. Here, we report preliminary data from a first-in-human dose-escalation study of APVO436 in patients with R/R AML and high-risk MDS. Study Design/Methods This ongoing Phase 1/1b study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03647800) was initiated to determine the safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of APVO436 as a single agent. Major inclusion criteria were: R/R AML with no other standard treatment option available, R/R MDS with > 5% marrow blasts or any peripheral blasts and failure of a hypomethylating agent, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, life expectancy > 2 months, white blood cells ≤ 25,000 cells/mm3, creatinine ≤ 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN), INR and PTT < 1.5 x ULN and alanine aminotransferase < 3 x ULN. Patients were not restricted from treatment due to cytogenetic or mutational status. Intravenous doses of APVO436 were administered weekly for up to six 28-day cycles (24 doses) with the option to continue dosing for up to 36 total cycles (144 doses). Flat and step dosing regimens were escalated using a safety-driven modified 3 + 3 design. Pre-medication with diphenhydramine, acetaminophen, and dexamethasone was administered starting with dose 1 to mitigate infusion related reactions (IRR) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). First doses and increasing step doses of APVO436 were infused over 20-24 hours followed by an observation period of 24 hours or more. Bone marrow biopsies were performed every other cycle with responses assessed by European Leukemia Net 2017 criteria for AML or International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria for MDS. Results The data cut-off for this interim analysis was July 9, 2020. Twenty-eight patients with primary R/R AML (n=19), therapy-related R/R AML (n=3), or high-risk MDS (n=6) have been enrolled and received a cumulative total of 186 doses. The number of doses received per patient ranged from 1 to 43 (mean of 6.4 doses). Most patients discontinued treatment due to progressive disease; however, blast reduction was achieved in 2 patients, with one patient with MDS maintaining a durable response for 11 cycles before progressing. APVO436 was tolerated across all dose regimens in all cohorts tested. The most common adverse events (AEs), regardless of causality, were edema (32%), diarrhea (29%), febrile neutropenia (29%), fever (25%), hypokalemia (25%), IRR (21%), CRS (18%), chills (18%), and fatigue (18%). AEs ≥ Grade 3 occurring in more than one patient were: febrile neutropenia (25%), anemia (18%), hyperglycemia (14%), decreased platelet count (11%), CRS (11%), IRR (7%), and hypertension (7%). After observing a single dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at a flat dose of 9 µg, step dosing was implemented and no DLTs have been observed thereafter. No treatment-related anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were observed. Transient serum cytokine elevations occurred after several reported IRR and CRS events, with IL-6 most consistently elevated. Conclusions Preliminary results indicate that APVO436 is tolerated in patients with R/R AML and MDS at the doses and schedules tested to date, with a manageable safety profile. Dose escalation continues and the results will be updated for this ongoing study. Disclosures Watts: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rafael Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lin:Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Bio-Path Holdings: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genetech-Roche: Research Funding; Celyad: Research Funding; Prescient Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mateon Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Trovagene: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Wang:Abbvie: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol Meyers Squibb (Celgene): Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Stemline: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Mims:Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cull:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Patel:Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; DAVA Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; France Foundation: Honoraria. Shami:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Walter:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Cogle:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chenault:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Macpherson:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Chunyk:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. McMahan:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gross:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Stromatt:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Download Full-text

Impact of Etiological Cytogenetic Abnormalities on Immunoparesis and Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-133516 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 6-6

Author(s):

Jessica Caro ◽

David Cairns ◽

Tom Menzies ◽

Charlotte Pawlyn ◽

Eileen M Boyle ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Normal Range ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Trial Entry ◽

Polyclonal Igg ◽

Immunoglobulin Levels

Introduction: Immunoparesis, or suppression of polyclonal immunoglobulins, is a common issue in multiple myeloma (MM). Prior studies have shown that the degree of IgM immunoparesis is prognostic for survival, as patients with the most severe IgM immunoparesis at diagnosis have the poorest survival outcomes. Little is known regarding the cause of this immunoparesis, with many assuming it is due to tumor bulk alone. More recent data has suggested that MM can be divided into subgroups with distinct biologies and outcomes based on etiological cytogenetic abnormalities. These include hyperdiploidy and translocation t(11;14), t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20), with the latter three groups being associated with high-risk disease. We hypothesized that the different etiological cytogenetic abnormalities drive bone marrow microenvironmental changes, resulting in different degrees of immunoparesis and subgroup-dependent effects on clinical outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in the MRC Myeloma IX and Cancer Research UK Myeloma XI trials. Patients with hyperdiploidy, t(11;14), t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) were included in the analysis. Polyclonal IgG, IgA, and IgM levels were measured at diagnosis, and the normal range was established by the 5th - 95th percentiles of adults over age 45 years in the UK: IgG 6 - 16 g/L, IgA 0.8 - 4 g/L, and IgM 0.5 - 2 g/L. Cytogenetic abnormalities were determined by FISH, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), or next generation sequencing (NGS). Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from date of trial entry to date of death, or censored at date last known to be alive. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from date of trial entry to progression or death, or censored at date last known to be alive and progression-free. Results: The study included 985 patients, of whom 47% were at least age 65 years and 61.1% were male. The most common MM subtype was IgG (63.4%), followed by IgA (24.5%), light chain only (8.4%), IgD (1.9%), oligosecretory (1.0%), IgM (0.5%), and non-secretory (0.3%). Hyperdiploidy represented 58.9% of cases, with t(11;14) seen in 18.2%, and t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) seen in 22.9%. The MM subtype was not distributed evenly amongst the different etiological cytogenetic abnormalities with IgG overrepresented in the hyperdiploid subgroup (69.4%), compared to 11% in t(11;14) and 19.5% in high-risk cases. IgA was overrepresented in high-risk cases (45.2%), compared to 41.1% in hyperdiploidy and 13.7% in t(11;14). The high-risk subgroup had more immunoparesis compared to the hyperdiploid and t(11;14) subgroups (median polyclonal IgG 3.0 vs. 3.8 vs. 3.9 g/L, IgA 0.2 vs. 0.4 vs. 0.2 g/L, IgM 0.1 vs. 0.2 vs. 0.2 g/L, respectively). There were also significantly more patients in the high-risk subgroup with polyclonal immunoglobulin levels below the normal range compared to the hyperdiploid and t(11;14) subgroups (IgG 96.9% vs. 86.0% vs. 88.2%, p = 0.0045; IgA 89.9% vs. 77.1% vs. 92.4%, p < 0.0001; IgM 94.0% vs. 88.9% vs. 92.7%, p < 0.0001). With median follow up of 77 months, the overall median PFS and OS were 19 months and 53 months, respectively. As expected, patients in the high-risk subgroup had significantly lower PFS and OS (14 and 35 months, respectively, p < 0.001), compared to the hyperdiploid (21 and 60 months) and t(11;14) subgroups (22 and 53 months). The effect of the degree of immunoparesis on PFS depended on the cytogenetic subgroup. Using polyclonal IgM as a continuous variable, Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant effect on PFS in patients with hyperdiploidy (HR 0.482, 95% CI 0.325 - 0.717, p = 0.0003). No difference was seen in the t(11;14) (HR 0.610, 95% CI 0.262 - 1.418, p = 0.2507) or high-risk subgroups (HR 1.087, 95% CI 0.505 - 2.341, p = 0.8304). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the etiological cytogenetic subgroup influences the degree and clinical impact of immunoparesis in newly diagnosed MM patients. A significant proportion of patients with t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) have IgG, IgA, and IgM levels below the normal range compared to patients with hyperdiploidy and t(11;14). This suggests that the underlying genetic abnormality (i.e., NSD2, C-MAF, and MAF-B, respectively) drives changes in the bone marrow microenvironment remodeling the plasma cell niche, resulting in suppression of normal plasma cell function and immunoglobulin levels. Disclosures Cairns: Celgene: Other: Travel Support; Celgene, Amgen, Merck: Research Funding. Menzies:Celgene, Amgen, Merck: Research Funding. Pawlyn:Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses. Morgan:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cook:Karyopharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; IQVIA: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Kaiser:Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Janssen, Amgen, Takeda, Celgene, AbbVie, Karyopharm, GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen, Amgen, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Janssen, Karyopharm: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda: Other: Travel expenses. Owen:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses. Jackson:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gsk: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Davies:Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotech: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Role of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Patients with Myelofibrosis in the JAK Inhibitor Era

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141790 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 52-53

Author(s):

Dawn Maze ◽

Murat O. Arcasoy ◽

Ryan Henrie ◽

Sonia Cerquozzi ◽

Rammurti Kamble ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Clinical Benefit ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematopoietic Cell ◽

Symptom Improvement ◽

Jak Inhibitor ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees

Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only potentially curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). However, despite improvements in donor availability, most patients receive non-HCT therapy in the form of conventional drugs (e.g. hydroxyurea), or more recently, JAK inhibitor therapy (JAKi). For a proportion of patients, JAKi offers durable clinical benefit in the form of symptom improvement, reduction in splenomegaly and improved quality of life. The role of HCT in the JAKi era has not been well studied, and despite recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis and refinement of prognostic scoring systems,real-world decision making remains challenging. The goal of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who received upfront JAKi vs. HCT for MF in dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS)-stratified categories. Methods This multicentre study included adult patients up to age 70 years with primary or secondary MF in chronic phase who were first seen at one of the eight participating centres in Canada and the United States between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) in patients with DIPSS int-1 risk or higher who received JAKi vs. HCT. To compare the planned, upfront treatment strategy, patients who received a short-course of JAKi as bridging therapy prior to HCT (< 6 months or documented plan of care) were analysed in the HCT group. Similarly, patients who were treated with JAKi, but received a HCT following JAKi failure (>12 months or documented progression) were analysed in the JAKi group. To minimize selection and lead-time bias, OS was calculated from the start of JAKi and date of transplant, respectively. Patients who were transplanted for accelerated- or blast-phase disease were not included in the analysis. OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences were tested using the log-rank test. Results Between 2012 and 2017, 506 patients with MF were seen at the study centres and 311 received JAKi or HCT. Of these, 174 (56%) had PMF and 137 (44%) had post-ET or post-PV MF. An upfront HCT strategy was used in 86 patients and an upfront JAKi strategy was used in 225 patients. Of those, 53 patients went on to receive HCT following JAKi failure. The median duration of follow up of survivors was 32.8 (1.2 - 99.2) months. The median OS of MF patients with DIPSS int-1 or higher was 65.3 (95% CI: 55.7 - 76.4) months for patients treated with an upfront JAKi strategy and 89.4 (95% CI: 20.4 - not reached) months for those treated with an upfront HCT strategy (p=0.018, Figure). The survival of patients with int-1 risk disease was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69 - 0.88) in the JAKi group vs. 0.60 (95% CI: 0.43 - 0.83) in the HCT group at 36 months and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.57-0.82) in the JAKi group vs. 0.60 (95% CI: 0.43-0.83) in the HCT group at 60 months. Given the small number of patients with DIPSS high risk, these patients were combined with the int-2 cohort for analysis. The survival of patients with int-2/high risk disease was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.49 - 0.69) in the JAKi group vs. 0.49 (95% CI: 0.36 - 0.65) in the HCT group at 36 months and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.24-0.55) in the JAKi group vs. 0.45 (95% CI: 0.32-0.62) in the HCT group at 60 months (Table). Conclusions Previous studies, which included many patients treated in the era before widespread availability of JAKi, supported an upfront HCT strategy in patients with higher risk MF. While these agents have not demonstrated consistent disease-modifying effects, many patients do experience durable clinical benefit in the form of symptom improvement and reduction in spleen size. In our study, there was no clear benefit of upfront HCT. The median OS of patients who received HCT upfront was longer than that of patients who were treated with upfront JAKi, but upfront HCT was associated with early mortality and the OS benefit was not apparent until after 5 years. An inherent limitation of this study is a lack of data on potentially important comorbid conditions which may have contributed to selection bias. However, to our knowledge this is the largest study to compare upfront HCT and JAKi strategies in patients with higher risk MF, making these findings relevant to modern clinical practice in the JAKi era. A delayed transplant approach may be appropriate for selected patients who are deriving clinical benefit from JAKi. Defining the optimal timing for HCT in higher risk MF remains a question for future research. Disclosures Maze: Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding. Arcasoy:CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Yacoub:Dynavax: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Ardelyx: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Cara Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Hylapharm: Current equity holder in private company; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. McNamara:Novartis: Honoraria. Foltz:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Constellation: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gupta:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol MyersSquibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Clonal Hematopoiesis, Tumor Markers, and Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147340 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 402-402

Author(s):

Nancy Gillis ◽

Lauren C Peres ◽

Christelle M Colin-Leitzinger ◽

Mingxiang Teng ◽

Raghunandan Reddy Alugubelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Age At Diagnosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Black Patients ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Hispanic Patients ◽

Race Ethnicity ◽

White Patients

Abstract Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is twice as common in Blacks compared to Non-Hispanic (NH) Whites and Hispanics. While treatment and mortality differences have been reported for Black patients with MM compared to NH White patients, there is limited data on Hispanic populations. Furthermore, the factors driving observed differences in MM presentation and treatment responses by race and ethnicity are largely unknown. We investigated demographic, clinical, and molecular features, including tumor mutations and clonal hematopoiesis (CH), in a diverse population of patients with MM to elucidate mechanisms driving clinical disparities. Methods: Patients diagnosed with MM who consented to our institutional biorepository protocol were eligible for inclusion. Demographic and clinical data were obtained from cancer registry and abstracted from electronic medical records. MM tumor cells were purified from bone marrow aspirates by CD138 affinity chromatography. DNA was isolated from tumor cells and whole blood for each patient, and whole exome sequencing (WES) data was generated. Tumor somatic mutations were characterized using paired tumor-normal (blood) WES. CH was classified based on blood-derived somatic mutations, using paired tumors and reference populations as germline comparators. Outcomes included overall survival (OS; date of diagnosis to death/last contact) and progression-free survival (PFS; 1 st-line treatment start to 1 st disease progression/death). Results: A diverse group of MM patients (n=496) were included: NH White (80%), NH Black (10%) and Hispanic (9%). NH Black and Hispanic MM patients had a younger median age at diagnosis (57 and 53 yrs, respectively) compared to NH Whites (63 yrs, p = 0.0001; Fig A). There was no statistical difference in treatment categories received by race/ethnicity. NH Black patients had a longer time to hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT; 376 days) than NH White or Hispanic patients (248 and 270 days, respectively, p = 0.011). There was an improvement in OS for NH Black (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.81) and Hispanic (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.37-1.18) patients compared to NH White patients, but the association was not statistically significant in Hispanics. In univariable analysis, OS was also associated with age at diagnosis, International Staging System (ISS), treatment with HCT, and treatment regimen category. In multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, ISS, HCT, and treatment category there was no longer a statistically significant association between OS and race/ethnicity. Although a worse PFS was present among Hispanic patients (adjusted HR 1.45, 95% CI 0.99-2.13), there was no statistically significant difference in PFS by race/ethnicity. The most mutated genes in MM tumors were KRAS (24%), NRAS (17%), TP53 (11%), DIS3 (9%), and BRAF (9%) (Fig B). Genes with significantly higher tumor mutation rates in Black compared to NH White patients were SP140 (12% v 4%, p = 0.026), AUTS2 (8% v 2%, p = 0.04), and SETD2 (6% v 1%, p = 0.037). IRF4 was most commonly mutated in Hispanics (11% v 3% in NH White and 0% in Black, p = 0.019). We identified CH using WES in 60 (12%) patients. The most CH mutations were in ASXL1, DNMT3A, and TET2. There was no difference in the prevalence of CH by race/ethnicity (p=0.8). There was a statistically significant difference in OS by race/ethnicity and CH status (Fig C). For NH Black patients, CH (HR 4.36, 95% CI 1.36-14.0) and age at diagnosis (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.14) were associated with inferior OS (Fig C). After adjusting for age in multivariable analysis, the positive association with CH status among Black patients was no longer statistically significant (HR 2.72, 95% CI 0.48-15.4). A positive, but not statistically significant, association for PFS in NH White patients with CH was also noted (adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 0.95-2.0). Conclusions: This is the first study to examine differences in tumor mutation profiles, CH, and treatment among different racial and ethnic groups of patients diagnosed with MM. Our data suggest that age at diagnosis, tumor mutations, and CH may all contribute to clinical disparities observed in patients with MM. Efforts to expand our cohort and incorporate additional molecular biomarkers, epidemiologic characteristics, and clinical parameters are ongoing with the ultimate goal of elucidating targetable biological mechanisms to personalize management and optimize outcomes for diverse patients diagnosed with MM. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hampton: M2Gen: Current Employment. Blue: WebMD: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siqueira Silva: AbbVie Inc.: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding. Baz: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS, sanofi, Karyopharm, Janssen, AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding. Nishihori: Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Shain: Janssen oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithLine, LLC: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Upfront 28-Day Metronomic Therapy for High-Risk Multiple Myeloma (HRMM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1843.1843 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1843-1843 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sharmilan Thanendrarajan ◽

Daisy V. Alapat ◽

Maurizio Zangari ◽

Carolina Schinke ◽

Christoph Heuck ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Proliferation Index ◽

University Of Arkansas ◽

Medical Sciences ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽

Metronomic Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Despite major advances in MM therapy with the inclusion of novel agent combinations for induction prior to and after autotransplant-supported high-dose melphalan, the 15% of patients with GEP-defined HRMM continue to fare poorly with PFS and OS not exceeding 2 and 3 years, respectively. This poor outcome has not been improved with less dose-intense and more dose-dense Total Therapy 5. Having previously reported on 16-day metronomic therapy with low-dose doxorubicin (DOX) and cisplatin (DDP) plus VTD (Papanikolaou, Haematologica), we explored further extension of such metronomic treatment to 28 days (metro-28) also in newly diagnosed HRMM patients. Patients and Methods: All patients signed a written informed consent and data analysis was approved by our IRB. In the outpatient setting, a single cycle of metro-28 comprised DOX and DDP each at 1.0mg/m2/d for 28d by continuous infusion (CI), along with VTD (bortezomib 1.0mg/m2 on days 1-4, 7-10, 13-16, 19-22, 25-28; DEX 12mg on days 1-4, 7-10, 13-16, 19-22, 25-28; thalidomide 50-100mg/d x 28d; some patients also received vincristine [VCR] at a flat daily dose of 0.07mg/d x 28d by CI. Results: Fourteen patients were initiated on metro-28. Their characteristics included age >=65y in 12; albumin <3.5g/dL in 8; B2M >5.5mg/L in 7; cytogenetic abnormalities [CA] were present in 10; GEP70 HRMM in 9/13; PR subgroup in 8/13 (Table 1). The median follow up is 11mo. As portrayed in Figure 1A, no patient has died; the 6mo PFS estimate was 85% (Figure 1B); responses included CR in 3/14, VGPR in 7/14 and PR in 10/14 (Figure 1C); and the PR duration estimate at 6mo is 80% (Figure 1D). Of interest, GEP70 scores morphed to low risk in 3/13. Vascular density (CD34) decreased markedly in most patients evaluated. Toxicities were minor; myelosuppression was virtually absent; alopecia was not encountered. Subsequent salvage therapies included repeat metro-28, combination chemotherapy (PACMED) and autotransplants. Conclusion: We conclude that metro-28 is a promising and safe strategy for elderly patients with HRMM, and we hypothesize an anti-angiogenic mechanism of action in addition to direct anti-MM effects. Table 1. Patient characteristics Factor n/N (%) Age >= 65 yr 12/14 (86%) Albumin < 3.5 g/dL 8/14 (57%) B2M >= 3.5 mg/L 9/12 (75%) B2M > 5.5 mg/L 7/12 (58%) Hb < 10 g/dL 10/14 (71%) Cytogenetic Abnormalities 10/14 (71%) CA within 1 Year of Therapy 10/14 (71%) CA within 90 Days of Therapy 9/14 (64%) GEP 70-Gene High Risk 9/13 (69%) GEP PR Subgroup 8/13 (62%) GEP Proliferation Index >= 10 7/13 (54%) GEP Centrosome Index >= 3 7/13 (54%) n/N (%): n- Number with factor, N- Number with valid data for factor Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Thanendrarajan: University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Alapat:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Zangari:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Schinke:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Heuck:Millenium: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board; Foundation Medicine: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. van Rhee:University of Arkansa for Medical Sciences: Employment. Rosenthal:Cancer Research and Biostatistics: Employment. Epstein:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Yaccoby:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Davies:Janssen: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment; Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Morgan:MMRF: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CancerNet: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Weismann Institute: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Barlogie:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment.

Download Full-text

Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Black and White Patients with Multiple Myeloma Initiating Daratumumab: A Real-World Chart Review Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-145941 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1965-1965

Author(s):

Shebli Atrash ◽

Philippe Thompson-Leduc ◽

Ming-Hui Tai ◽

Shuchita Kaila ◽

Kathleen Gray ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Index Date ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Treatment Patterns ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

New Therapies ◽

Black Patients ◽

Line Of Therapy ◽

White Patients

Abstract Background and Objective: Daratumumab, a CD38 monoclonal antibody, was approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) among previously treated patients in 2015, and among newly diagnosed patients in 2018. While the safety and efficacy of daratumumab has been well documented in clinical trials, there is limited real world information on the use and outcomes of daratumumab in patients of different races. This is of particular relevance for potential health care disparities, as evidence suggests that African American patients with MM receive new therapies later in their disease and may experience different outcomes than White patients (Blood Adv. 2019;3:2986-94, Cancer Med. 2017;6: 2876-85). Therefore, we sought to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with MM who received daratumumab. Results were stratified by race (i.e., Black vs. White). Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with MM initiating daratumumab between 1/2018 and 5/2020. De-identified data were retrieved from two U.S. clinical sites, Levine Cancer Institute (Atrium Health) and Weill Cornell Medicine. Patients were included if they had a confirmed diagnosis of MM and were at least 18 years old at the time of daratumumab initiation (index date). Patients who accessed daratumumab through interventional clinical trials were excluded. Patients were followed from the index date until death, loss to follow-up, or date of chart abstraction, whichever occurred first. Patient characteristics included age, sex, body mass index, MM stage at diagnosis, cytogenetic profile as of the index date, and number of prior regimens. Treatment patterns included type and duration of daratumumab-based regimen. Treatment outcomes included treatment response (as per physician notes and guided by the International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria) and time to next line of therapy (TTNT; the time between the index date and the initiation of the following line of therapy, censoring at the end of follow-up). All analyses were descriptive and stratified by race. Results: A total of 252 patient charts were extracted: 89 Black (35.3%) and 163 White (64.7%). Black patients were, on average, younger at diagnosis (61.7 years old vs. 67.0) and at the index date (Table 1). The proportion of females was similar across both races (Black: 44.9%, White: 46.6%), and mean body mass index was slightly higher in Black patients (28.7 vs. 26.8). Black patients had longer time between initial MM diagnosis and initiation of daratumumab (43.2 vs. 34.1 months). MM stage at diagnosis, cytogenetic profile at index, and prior regimens were similar between White and Black patients (Table 1). While unknown cytogenetics were most common for both White (45.4%) and Black (59.6%) patients, White patients (20.2%) were twice as likely as Blacks (9.0%) to have high-risk cytogenetics. Black patients received more lines of treatment prior to the initiation of daratumumab (mean 2.9 vs. 2.3), with 55.1% of Black patients receiving 3 or more prior lines. The most common regimen was daratumumab with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (DPd) for both races (Table 1), with use of DPd being particularly common (51.7%) in Black patients. Duration of treatment with daratumumab was similar across races (Table 1). Treatment response was similar across races: among patients initiating daratumumab in first, second and third line or after, respectively, overall response rate was 100.0%, 90.9% and 67.6% for Black patients and 100.0%, 82.9% and 65.4% for White patients. Among patients initiating daratumumab in third line or after, median TTNT was 12.3 months among Black patients and 10.4 months among White patients. Conclusions: Black and White patients had similar overall response rate and comparable TTNT. However, Black patients initiated daratumumab later in their treatment, with more than half of Black patients initiating daratumumab in fourth or later line of therapy, and a lower percentage of Black patients had high-risk cytogenetics, suggesting a potential discrepancy in access to new therapies for MM. These findings were observed in a relatively modest sample size, and therefore interpretation warrants caution. Future studies should investigate whether such a discrepancy in treatment access exists, potential reasons for this discrepancy, and strategies to mitigate the effect of race on access to new therapies in MM. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Atrash: GSK: Research Funding; AMGEN: Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Thompson-Leduc: Biogen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Shire/Takeda: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy; BioMerieux: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; BioFire Diagnostics: Consultancy. Tai: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Current Employment. Kaila: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Current Employment. Gray: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Ghelerter: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Lafeuille: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Lefebvre: Regeneron: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Rossi: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Updated Efficacy of Eltanexor Monotherapy in Patients with Higher Risk Hypomethylating Myelodysplastic Syndrome Primary Refractory to Hypomethylating Agents

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-151359 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3676-3676

Author(s):

Sangmin Lee ◽

Sanjay R Mohan ◽

Jessica Knupp ◽

Kamal Chamoun ◽

Igor Karasik ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Prior Therapy ◽

Transfusion Independence ◽

Secondary Mds

Abstract Background: Patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) refractory to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis with a median overall survival (mOS) of 4-6 months. Lack of response to HMA therapy, advanced age at relapse, male sex, bone marrow blasts >5% and high risk disease classification by International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) confer worse outcomes. Eltanexor is a second-generation, oral, selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound with markedly reduced brain penetration relative to selinexor in preclinical models. This is believed to result in attenuation of centrally mediated anorexia, weight loss, and nausea, allowing for more frequent dosing. Early results from a phase 1/2 study of eltanexor in patients with higher-risk HMA-refractory MDS demonstrated marrow complete responses (mCRs), hematologic improvement (HI) and stable disease (SD); side effects were primarily low-grade, dose-dependent, and reversible (Lee EHA 2021). Here we provide an update on baseline characteristics, blast reduction in mCR patients, extent of transfusion independence and additional subgroup analyses. Methods: This phase 1/2 study (NCT02649790) evaluated oral eltanexor monotherapy in patients with high-risk or intermediate-2 by IPSS and 5%-19% myeloblasts. Of 20 patients enrolled, 15 patients were evaluable for efficacy and constitute the population studied in this analysis; 5 patients were non evaluable for efficacy due to trial discontinuation prior to response assessment. Two doses of eltanexor were evaluated: 10 mg (n=5) or 20 mg (n=10) each given qd 5 days per week. Results: Amongst the 15 efficacy evaluable patients, there were 8 males, median age 76 years (range 62-89), 10.0% (range 7-18%) median bone marrow blasts at enrollment, and with a median of two prior regimens (range 1-4). All patients primary HMA-refractory MDS; 9 patients (60%) with high risk and 5 (33%) with intermediate-2 per IPSS, 1 with intermediate-1 per IPSS. Similarly, using the global MD Anderson Cancer Center risk prognosis model, 14 patients (93%) had intermediate-2 or high-risk MDS. The overall response rate (mCR+HI) was 53% including 47% mCRs. Additionally, 5 patients (33%) had SD. Median blast reduction in the 7 patients with mCR was 78.6% (range 55.6%, 85.7%). Four patients had hematologic improvement (HI) including 2 patients with tri-lineage HI. Of the 7 patients who achieved mCR, 4 had significant reduction in transfusion requirements with 3 of these patients achieving complete transfusion independence for 5-10 cycles. In the 10-mg cohort (n=5), all patients derived clinical benefit with 3 patients reaching mCR and 2 patients with SD. In the 20-mg cohort (n=10), 4 patients had mCR and 3 had SD. Median overall survival for all efficacy evaluable patients was 9.86 months. OS for patients who reached mCR (n=7) was significantly longer than for patients who did not reach mCR (n=8): median 11.86 vs 8.67 months (hazard ratio [HR]=0.27, p=0.05), and significantly longer than OS for patients with PD (n=3, mOS=3.15 months, HR=0.23, p=0.04). Notably, mCR was seen in the 3 patients treated with >2 prior therapies and/or with secondary MDS: 1 patient with secondary MDS and 4 prior therapies; 1 with secondary MDS and one prior therapy; and 1 with de novo MDS and 3 prior therapies). Conclusions: Single-agent oral eltanexor was active in patients with higher-risk, primary HMA-refractory MDS including those with secondary MDS or with >2 lines of prior therapy. Patients with mCR had significantly longer mOS than patients without mCR and had median blast reduction of 78.6%. Further evaluation of eltanexor in MDS as a single agent and in combination with other agents is ongoing. Disclosures Lee: Innate: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pin Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mohan: Astex: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Knupp: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Chamoun: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Karasik: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Bai: Abbvie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Takeda: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Ingalls: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yang: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shah: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kauffman: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shacham: Karyopharm: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Patents & Royalties: (8999996, 9079865, 9714226, PCT/US12/048319, and I574957) on hydrazide containing nuclear transport modulators and uses, and pending patents PCT/US12/048319, 499/2012, PI20102724, and 2012000928) . Bhatnagar: Astellas: Honoraria; Cell Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Donor-Derived Tumor Associated Antigen-Specific T Cell Therapy in Patients with High-Risk or Relapsed Acute Leukemia Post Allogeneic BMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153207 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2828-2828

Author(s):

Hannah Kinoshita ◽

Kenneth R. Cooke ◽

Melanie Grant ◽

Maja Stanojevic ◽

Conrad Russell Young Cruz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

T Cell Receptor ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Receptor ◽

Publicly Traded ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

T Cell Therapy ◽

Post Infusion

Abstract Background: Patients with hematologic malignancies relapsing after allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (BMT) have limited response to conventional salvage therapies with an expected 1-year overall survival (OS) of <20%. Current strategies to treat relapsed hematopoietic cancer after BMT, such as chemotherapy and donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) to enhance the immunologic graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect, have low efficacy and are associated with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). An alternative strategy to boost the GVL effect is to infuse donor-derived T-cells targeting tumor-associated antigen (TAA) peptides as circulating TAA-specific T-cells are associated with maintenance of remission post-BMT. In this phase-I study, we evaluated the safety and clinical outcomes following administration of a novel T-cell therapeutic targeting three TAAs, WT1, PRAME and survivin in patients with acute leukemia who relapsed or were at high-risk of relapse after allogeneic BMT. Methods: Lymphocytes obtained from the BMT donor were manufactured to target TAAs; WT1, PRAME and survivin, which are over-expressed and immunogenic in most hematologic malignancies. Patients received TAA-T infusions at doses of 0.5-4x10 7/m 2. Patients were evaluated for acute infusion-related toxicity, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity, GVHD and monitored for clinical response post-infusion. T-cell receptor sequencing was conducted on the TAA-T product and the recipients' peripheral blood prior to and post-infusion to monitor persistence and expansion of the product. Results: Twenty-three BMT recipients with relapsed/refractory (n=11) and/or high-risk (n=12) acute myeloid leukemia (n=20) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=3) were infused post-transplant. No patient developed CRS or neurotoxicity, and only one patient developed grade III GVHD. Of the patients who relapsed post-BMT and received bridging therapy, the majority (n=9/11) achieved complete hematologic remission before receiving TAA-T. Relapsed patients exhibited a 1-year OS of 36% and 1-year leukemia-free survival of 27.3% post-TAA-T (Figure 1A and B). The poorest prognosis patients (relapsed less than 6 months after transplant) exhibited a 1-year OS of 42.8% post-relapse (n=7) (Figure 1C). Median survival was not reached for high-risk patients who received pre-emptive TAA-T post-transplant (n=12) with eight of the nine (88.9%) evaluable patients at 1-year post-infusion remaining alive (Figure 1B). Of those, five (62.5%) were alive and in continued remission at the time of submission. Evaluation of unique T-cell receptor clonotypes (present in the product but not the recipient prior to infusion) demonstrated expansion and persistence in patients up to 1-year post-infusion (Figure 1D). Conclusions: Although as a Phase-I study, concomitant anti-leukemic therapy was allowed, TAA-T cell therapy was shown to be safe and well-tolerated with sustained remissions observed in high-risk and relapsed patients. Moreover, adoptively transferred TAA-T expanded in vivo as detected by T-cell receptor V-beta (TCRVb) sequencing persisted up to at least 1-year post-infusion (Figure 1D). (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT002203902) Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cruz: Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Catamaran Bio: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Hanley: Mana Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cellevolve: Consultancy; Maxcyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bollard: SOBI: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cabaletta Bio: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Catamaran Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellectis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria; Repertoire Immune Medicines: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Neximmune: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Mana Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.

Download Full-text