scholarly journals Acute Myeloid Leukemia Measurable Residual Disease Detection by Flow Cytometry in Peripheral Blood Versus Bone Marrow

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Douglas Godwin ◽  
Yi Zhou ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Mallette M. Asmuth ◽  
Carole Shaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Disease Detection ◽  
Measurable Residual Disease ◽  
Acute Myeloid

scholarly journals Measurable Residual Disease Detected by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry and Sequencing Improves Prediction of Relapse and Survival in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu-Jia Liu ◽  
Wen-Yan Cheng ◽  
Xiao-Jing Lin ◽  
Shi-Yang Wang ◽  
Tian-Yi Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Net Reclassification Improvement ◽  
Measurable Residual Disease ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Time Point

The clinically ideal time point and optimal approach for the assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are still inconclusive. We investigated the clinical value of multiparameter flow cytometry-based MRD (MFC MRD) after induction (n = 492) and two cycles of consolidation (n = 421). The latter time point was proved as a superior indicator with independent prognostic significance for both relapse-free survival (RFS, HR = 3.635, 95% CI: 2.433–5.431, P <0.001) and overall survival (OS: HR = 3.511, 95% CI: 2.191–5.626, P <0.001). Furthermore, several representative molecular MRD markers were compared with the MFC MRD. Both approaches can establish prognostic value in patients with NPM1 mutations, and FLT3, C-KIT, or N-RAS mutations involved in kinase-related signaling pathways, while the combination of both techniques further refined the risk stratification. The detection of RUNX1–RUNX1T1 fusion transcripts achieved a considerable net reclassification improvement in predicting the prognosis. Conversely, for patients with biallelic CEBPA or DNMT3A mutations, only the MFC method was recommended due to the poor prognostic discriminability in tracking mutant transcripts. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the MFC MRD after two consolidation cycles independently predicted clinical outcomes, and the integration of MFC and molecular MRD should depend on different types of AML-related genetic lesions.

scholarly journals Impact of Minimal Residual Disease and Chimerism Monitoring at Different Timepoints after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Reyes María Martín-Rojas ◽  
Gillen Oarbeascoa ◽  
Rebeca Bailén ◽  
Ignacio Gómez-Centurión ◽  
Luis Miguel Juarez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Risk Of Relapse ◽  
Acute Myeloid

¶ Martin-Rojas RM and Oarbeascoa G contributed equally to this work. INTRODUCTION Relapse is the main cause of treatment failure after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) could provide a more accurate assessment of the depth of response, and therefore identify patients with higher risk of relapse. AIMS The aim of our study was to analyze the impact of pre-HSCT flow cytometry (FCM) and molecular MRD together with chimerism and MRD in the early post-HSCT period in patients with AML. METHODS We conducted a retrospective study in patients with complete remission AML who underwent a HSCT between 2008 and 2019 in our center. MRD was analyzed by flow cytometry in bone marrow aspirates and by quantitative RT-PCR (NMP1, RUNX1-RUNX1T1, CBFB-MYH11, KMT2A-MLLT3, WT1) in bone marrow aspirates and/or peripheral blood. MRD was determined within the 30 days preceding the HSCT and at day +30 and +90 post-HSCT. Bone marrow and selected CD34+ lineage chimerism was analyzed by STR (AmpFISTR SGM Plus, Thermo Fisher) at days +30 and +90 post-HSCT. This study was approved by our Institutional Ethics Committee. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 24 and R version 3.5.1. RESULTS A total of 115 patients were analyzed. Pre-HSCT MRD was negative in 58 patients (50.4%) and positive in 57 patients (49.6%). We found no statistically significant differences in the characteristics between the two groups (Table 1). Median follow up was 39 months (IQR 10.4-55.8). 3-year overall survival (OS) for patients with pre-HSCT negative MRD was 72.5% versus 70.3% in patients with positive MRD (p=0.41), with an event free survival (EFS) of 66.9% versus 66.1 (p=0.48) respectively (Figure 1). Median time to the beginning of immunosuppression withdrawal was 82.5 days (IQR 59-93) for patients with negative MRD and 68 days (IQR 55.3-85.3) for patients with positive MRD (p<0.001). The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) and moderate-severe chronic GVHD did not show statistically significant differences based on the MRD status. Similarly, the cumulative incidence of relapse and the 2-year mortality was not significantly different between the two groups. Patients with negative MRD at day +30 showed a 2-year OS of 83.5% versus 58.1% in patients with positive MRD (p=0.03) and a EFS of 79.9% versus 48.6% (Figure 2). The cumulative incidence of relapse was more elevated in patients with positive MRD (29.8% versus 13.6%) at day +30. Patients with mixed chimerism (MC) at day +30 showed a significantly lower 3-year OS and EFS than patients with complete chimerism (CC). Likewise, the cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly higher in patients with MC, both if detected in bone marrow aspirate and in CD34+ cells. The multivariate analysis revealed that MRD status at day +30 post-HSCT was an independent prognostic factor for EFS (HR 3.74; 95% CI 1.38-10.1; p=0.009). CONCLUSIONS Patients with AML presenting a positive MRD in the early post-HSCT period and those who show a MC at day +30 post-HSCT have lower EFS, with positive MRD at day +30 being an independent prognostic factor for EFS. The evaluation of MRD and chimerism in the early post-HSCT period is useful to identify patients with higher risk of relapse, who may take advantage of preemptive measures. Disclosures Kwon: Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Molecular Measurable Residual Disease Detection in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Using Error Corrected Next Generation Sequencing

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5-6
Author(s):  
Nikhil Patkar ◽  
Anam Fatima Shaikh ◽  
Chinmayee Kakirde ◽  
Rakhi Salve ◽  
Prasanna Bhanshe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Measurable Residual Disease ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Introduction The monitoring of a patient's response to chemotherapy, called, measurable residual disease (MRD) is one of the most important predictors of outcome in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Although universally applicable, FCM-MRD for AML suffers from low sensitivity as compared to precursor B lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Here, we evaluated the clinical utility of error corrected next generation sequencing (NGS) to detect MRD (NGS-MRD) in AML using single molecule molecular inversion probes (smMIPS). We compare NGS-MRD and FCM-MRD and determine their impact on patient outcome. We demonstrate that error corrected NGS-MRD at early timepoints in therapy is an independent and significant predictor of outcome in patients of AML treated with conventional therapies. Methods We created a 35 gene "hotspot" panel comprising of a pool of 302 smMIPS. In brief, this panel covers regions of 35 commonly mutated genes in AML.FLT3-ITD were detected using a novel one-step PCR based NGS assay. Post mapping, singleton reads (originating from one UMI) were discarded and consensus family based variant calling was performed. We then created a site and mutation specific error model to ascertain the relevance of an observed variant at each site. A limit of detection (LOD) experiment demonstrated a lower detection limit of 0.05%. For FLT3-ITD the LOD was 0.002%. A total of 393 adult patients of AMLwere accrued over a period of six years.Patients were treated with standard 3+7 induction followed by 3 doses of HiDAC. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation was offered where feasible. Somatic mutations at diagnosis were evaluated using a smMIPS based 50 gene myeloid panel which was applicable to 327 patients [83.2% of AMLs, median 2 mutations per case (range 1 - 6 trackable mutations)].MRD assessment could be performed in 201 adult patients of AML in morphological remission (not performed in the rest because of suboptimal quality DNA at MRD time points or missing sample).Samples were sequenced on multiple S4 flow cells of a NovaSeq 6000 using 150PE chemistry.FCM-MRD was obtained from the bone marrow at end of induction (PI, n=200) and end of first consolidation cycle (PC, n=98). NGS-MRD sample also obtained at the same time points (PI, n=196& PC, n=127) from the bone marrow (n=266) or peripheral blood (n=45). Results The interaction of mutations that were trackable at diagnosis can be seen in Figure 1A. A total of 345 mutations could be detected in 196 patients (Figure 1B) with a median VAF of 1.01% [0.82% after exclusion of mutations in DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1 (DTA) genes; (median of 2 mutations for PI and one for PC timepoint)]. The median consensus read coverage was 11,127 for the smMIPS assay, whereas for the FLT3-ITD assay it was 13,96,366.The median follow-up of the cohort was 42.3 months. The presence of NGS-MRD (70.9%) was associated with inferior overall survival (OS; p=0.001) [hazard ratio(HR)- 2.24; 95% confidence interval (CI)- 1.47 to 3.43] and relapse free survival (RFS; p=0.0002) [HR- 2.28; 95% CI- 1.58 to 3.31] at PI time point as well as PC time points [40.94% positive; OS (p=0.008)(HR- 1.92; 95% CI- 1.14 to 3.22) and RFS (p=0.004)(HR- 1.90; 95% CI- 1.18 to 3.05)].Similarly, FCM-MRD (44%) was predictive of inferior OS (p=0.0002)(HR- 2.08; 95% CI- 1.38 to 3.13)and RFS (p=0.0008)(HR- 1.81; 95% CI- 1.26 to 2.60) at PI as well as PC time points [21.4% positive, OS (p=0.04)(HR- 1.87; 95% CI- 0.89 to 3.91) and RFS (p=0.001)(HR- 2.38; 95% CI- 1.17 to 4.81)]. On multivariate analysis post induction NGS MRD emerged as the most important independent prognostic factor predictive of inferior outcome for OS [HR- 1.94; 95% CI-1.15 to 3.27; (p<0.0001)]as well asRFS[HR-2.05; 95% CI-1.30 to 3.23; (p<0.0001)].On incorporating results combining both the MRD modalities,patients that were positive by both techniqueshad a significantly inferior outcome with respect to OS (p=0.0002; HR- 4.66; 95% CI- 2.71 to 8.0)and RFS (p=0.0001; HR- 4.03; 95% CI- 2.51 to 6.47) at PI timepoint as well as PC timepoint [OS (p=0.02; HR- 3.73; 95% CI- 1.07 to 12.97) and RFS (p=0.0015; HR- 4.17; 95% CI- 1.27 to 13.7)] as compared to patients negative by both modalities (Figure 1E,F) Conclusion In conclusion, we demonstrate that error corrected panel-based sequencing is feasible for MRD monitoring in AML and may offer an advantage over existing techniques. Maximum clinical utility may be leveraged by combining FCM and NGS modalities. Figure Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Minimal Residual Disease After the First Cycle of Chemotherapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Comparative Study of WT1 RQ-PCR and 4-Color Flow Cytometry.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2535-2535
Author(s):  
Carlo Marani ◽  
Raffaella Grasso ◽  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
Marino Clavio ◽  
Fabio Guolo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Intermediate Dose

Abstract Abstract 2535 Background and aims. Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) has a relevant prognostic value in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). MRD, when used as early treatment response assessment, allows identification of true low-risk and high-risk patients, who may profit alternative chemotherapy approach. In the present retrospective study, we evaluated the impact of MRD assessed by 4-color flow cytometry and WT1 RQ-PCR gene expression in a cohort of AML patients treated at our institution. Methods. Bone marrow samples of 50 adult AML patients (45 de novo and 5 secondary) with available karyotype (K), FLT3-ITD and NPM-A genes mutational status were assessed for MRD after induction. All included patients had a baseline WT1 expression greater than 1000 copies/Ablx104 (range 1060–346060; lab references for normal values 0–500). Fludarabine-based regimen was used as induction; one course of intermediate dose Ara-C 2g/sqm plus idarubicin, followed by 3 courses of intermediate dose Ara-C (2g/sqm) as further consolidation therapy. WT1 log reduction (DWT1) was used to assess the WT1 clearance (DWT1 = logWT1diagnosis – logWT1 post induction). A positive flow MRD was defined by the presence of no less than 25 clustered leukemic cells/105 total events - threshold of 2.5 × 10−4 residual leukemic cells. In patients submitted to bone marrow transplantation (BMT) only the first consolidation course was administered and disease free survival (DFS) was censored at the date of BMT. Results. Two (4%) patients had favorable, 40 (80%) intermediate, and 5 (10%) poor risk K (3 had no metaphases); 14 (28/%) carried FLT3-ITD mutation: among them 8 carried NPM-A mutation too, while 6 were wild type. After the first induction regimen 42 of 50 (84%) patients achieved a complete remission (CR). Patients with a negative flow MRD (32%) had 3 years DFS of 69.5%, whereas those with a positive flow MRD (68%) had a DFS of 27.3% (p = 0.032). Patients with a DWT1 > 1.5 log (65%) had a 3-years DFS of 58.3%, whereas those with a DWT1 ≤ 1.5 log (35%) had a DFS at 1 and 2-years of 13,5% and 0%, respectively (p < 0.001). All patients with a negative flow MRD had also a DWT1 > 1.5 log, whereas 12 (52%) of those who achieved a DWT1 > 1.5 log were still positive by flow MRD. Fourteen (28%) patients with a high risk (HR) profile at diagnosis (poor risk K, intermediate K with FLT3-ITDpos/NPM-Aneg, AML secondary to therapy or previous haematological disorder), 6 were no responder to induction, whereas no one of 8 patients in CR reached a negative MRD status in both test with a very poor outcome (projected DFS 4.8 months). MRD assessment using both flow and DWT1 allow to discriminate no-HR profile patients in three prognostic group: good (flow MRD neg) intermediate (flow MRD pos and DWT1 > 1.5 log) and adverse prognosis (flow MRD pos and DWT1 ≤ 1.5 log) with a projected DFS of 70.5 months, 38.2 months and 4.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions. DWT1 identified patients who would relapse better than flow, whereas a negative flow MRD was the best predictor of long DFS. Using both test in combination with baseline biologic parameters enabled the definition of discrete prognostic categories (Fig 1). Outcome of patients with DWT1 ≤ 1.5 log was very poor and comparable with that of patients with HR profile at diagnosis. In these patients forecast a cure is very difficult with the current treatment option and clinical trials with new drugs should be used already in up-front setting. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Persistence of Minimal Residual Disease Assessed By Multi-Parameter Flow Cytometry (MFC) at 30 and 90 Days after Achieving Complete Remission Predicts Outcome in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1015-1015
Author(s):  
Pramod Pinnamaneni ◽  
Jeffrey L. Jorgensen ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Sherry R. Pierce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Purpose – To determine the value of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) assessed by Multi-parameter Flow Cytometry (MFC) after achieving initial response to therapy, in predicting outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Methods – We investigated the predictive value of MRD assessment by MFC in 191 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated between February 2010 and April 2014 at our institution who had available MRD assessment. MRD by MFC was assessed using an 8-color panel containing 19 distinct markers, on bone marrow specimens obtained at the time of achievement of CR and at approximately 30 days and 90 days after achieving CR. Residual leukemic blasts were identified based on phenotypic differences from normal myelomonocytic precursors. Sensitivity was estimated at 0.1% in most cases, with maximum achievable sensitivity of 0.01%, depending on the leukemic phenotype. Results – Of the 191 patients, 167 (87%) achieved complete remission (CR) or CR without platelet recovery (CRp). Their median age was 58 years (Range, 17-85). 84 (44%) were older than 60 years. Median WBC at presentation was 3.2 x 109/L(Range, 0.5-100.2 x 109/L) and median bone marrow blast percentage was 43% (Range, 11-96%). Cytogenetics was favorable risk in 4 (2%), intermediate risk in130 (68%) and adverse risk in 57 (30%). Treatment included cytarabine plus anthracycline in 170 (89%) and hypomethylating agents-based strategies in 21 (11%). 48 patients had available samples at 30 days post CR and 32 (67%) became MRD negative. Achieving MRD negative status was associated with a statistically significant improvement in CR duration (p=0.02) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.0005). 56 patients were evaluated for MRD status at 90 days and 45 (80%) were negative. Again, achieving MRD negative status was associated with a significant improvement in CR duration (p=0.002) and OS (p=0.0009). Conclusion – Achieving MRD negative status by MFC at 30 and 90 days post CR is associated with an improved outcome in patients with AML Figure 1 Figure 1. Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document