PROphylaxis for ThromboEmbolism in Critical Care Trial (PROTECT): A Pilot Study.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1784-1784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen McDonald ◽  
Germain Poirier ◽  
Paul Hebert ◽  
Joe Pagliarello ◽  
Graeme Rocker ◽  
...  

Abstract Rationale: No published randomized trials have compared low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for thromboprophylaxis in medical-surgical ICU patients. Objectives: A) Our Feasibility Objectives were to assess: 1) timely enrollment and complete, blinded study drug administration, 2) LMWH bioaccumulation in renal insufficiency, 3) twice weekly leg ultrasounds, and 4) recruitment rates for a future trial. B) Our Clinical Objectives were to assess 1) the effectiveness of LMWH vs UFH by estimating DVT, and pulmonary embolism (PE) rates, and 2) the safety of LMWH vs UFH regarding bleeding, thrombocytopenia and HIT. Methods: In this prospective randomized stratified concealed blinded multicenter trial, we included patients ≥18 with expected ICU stay ≥72h. We excluded trauma, orthopaedic, cardiac, or neurosurgery, severe hypertension, DVT, PE or hemorrhage within 3 mos, INR >2ULN, PTT >2ULN, platelets <100 x109/L, creatinine clearance <30ml/min, therapeutic anticoagulation, >2 doses of heparin, and palliative care patients. By centralized telephone randomization, we allocated patients to dalteparin 5,000 IU QD SC or UFH 5,000 IU BID SC. All clinicians caring for patients were blinded except the pharmacist. Bilateral leg compression ultrasounds were performed within 48h of ICU admission, twice weekly, on suspicion of DVT, and 7 days post ICU discharge. Results: A) Feasibility Objectives: 1) Timely, complete study drug administration occurred for >99% of scheduled doses; every dose was blinded. 2) No LWMH bioaccumulation was observed as measured by anti-Xa levels when creatinine clearance decreased to <30 ml/min. 3) Ultrasounds were performed without exception. 4) Estimated recruitment for a future trial is 4–5 patients/month/center. B) Clinical Objectives: 1) Effectiveness: Among 128 patients, 11 (8.6 %) had DVT, 2 (1.6 %) had PE. 2) Safety: 6 (4.7 %) had clinically important bleeds, 23 (18 %) had minor bleeds, 4 (3.1%) developed a platelet count <50 x109/L, and 2 (0.8%) had HIT diagnosed by serotonin release assay. Conclusions: DVT rates remain high in medical-surgical ICU patients despite universal heparin thromboprophylaxis. This pilot study suggests that a randomized clinical trial comparing LMWH vs UFH feasible. An adequately powered trial is needed to achieve the clinical objectives.

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahbod Rahimi ◽  
Paul Dorian ◽  
Sheldon Cheskes ◽  
Gerald Lebovic ◽  
Steve Lin

Purpose: The effects of amiodarone and lidocaine on the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), relative to time to treatment in out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients is unknown. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Amiodarone, Lidocaine, Placebo (ROC ALPS) randomized trial examining the association of time to treatment with ROSC at emergency department (ED) arrival. Method: In the ROC ALPS trial, adults with non-traumatic OHCA with initial VF/pVT after ≥ 1 shock were randomized to receive amiodarone, lidocaine or placebo. We used logistic regression to examine the association of time to treatment (911 call to study drug administration interval) with ROSC at ED arrival. Results: Overall, 1112 (36.7%) patients had ROSC at ED arrival. Time to treatment data were available for 2994 (99%) of the patients. The proportion of patients with ROSC at ED arrival decreased as time to drug administration increased, in amiodarone (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.90-0.94 per min increase), lidocaine (OR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96) and placebo (OR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96) arms. The odds of ROSC at ED in the amiodarone group (versus placebo) changed in relation to the time of drug administration (OR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99). With short times to drug administration, ROSC was higher in amiodarone versus placebo recipients, whereas ROSC was higher with placebo at later times. Comparing lidocaine to placebo, ROSC rate increased at all times (OR 1.29, 95% CI: 1.07-1.59); there was no time to drug administration effect (OR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.97-1.03). Among all patients, survival at hospital discharge was 21.0%, 24.4%, and 23.7% for placebo, amiodarone and lidocaine respectively. Conclusion: Amiodarone’s efficacy in restoring ROSC declined with longer duration of arrest, potentially due to its adverse hemodynamic effects. Overall, amiodarone and lidocaine had similar effects on mortality; in this study, ROSC at ED arrival trend did not reflect the overall survival rate


Author(s):  
S Doemming ◽  
T-P Simon ◽  
A Humbs ◽  
L Martin ◽  
C Bruells ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rami Tadros ◽  
Gillian E Caughey ◽  
Sally Johns ◽  
Sepehr Shakib

Aims/Background A fundamental part of all clinical trials is informed consent, reflecting the respect for the volunteer’s autonomy. Research participation is voluntary; therefore, certain aspects of the proposed study must be disclosed so that volunteers can make an informed decision. In this study, we aimed to examine the level of comprehension and recall of healthy volunteers from the informed consent process. Methods The study was carried out at a single phase I clinical trials unit. A questionnaire was administered to each volunteer to assess recall of important aspects of the study at the day-1 visit following the informed consent process. The questionnaire contained seven questions regarding study objectives, route, frequency and type of drug administration, adverse effects, number of subjects previously exposed and remuneration. One point was awarded for each correct answer. Results A total of 266 volunteers were administered the questionnaire. The mean total score (±standard deviation) for all volunteers was 4.5 ± 1.1 points out of 7, with a range of 0.8–6.7. For all 10 studies, 91% of volunteers responded correctly when answering about the route of administration, and 90% were able to accurately state the correct payment amount. Only 7% were able to repeat the aims of the study correctly. Conclusion The poor performance of our study volunteers raises concerns about recall of information prior to study drug administration. This has implications for the volunteer’s safety and ability to provide true informed consent. Interventions to improve recall prior to dosing should be undertaken.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6050-6050
Author(s):  
R. M. Rifkin ◽  
M. Hussein ◽  
R. Iskandar ◽  
A. O’Sullivan ◽  
D. Thompson ◽  
...  

6050 Background: A randomized Phase III clinical trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, and reduced-dose dexamethasone (DVd) versus conventional doxorubicin, vincristine, and reduced-dose dexamethasone (VAd) found similar efficacy in the treatment of newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (Cancer, in press). However, observed clinical advantages of DVd included less toxicity and supportive care. (Cancer In press). Methods: This economic evaluation was conducted as a piggyback to the clinical trial. Utilization data were collected prospectively for enrolled patients (DVd = 97; VAd = 95). Costs were estimated by applying standard US unit costs in 2004 to observed utilization. We compared resource utilization and costs for study drug administration, other care (hospitalizations due to AEs, tests, transfusions, and concomitant medications), and total costs during follow-up for patients receiving DVd versus VAd using 2-sided t-tests. Results: DVd patients required significantly fewer hospital (1.5 vs 8.5; p < 0.01) and clinic days (4.8 vs 14.4; p < 0.01) for study drug administration. Costs of study drug were significantly higher for DVd patients ($16,181 vs $788; p < 0.01), but lower hospitalization costs ($3,311 vs $18,492; p < 0.01) and clinic costs ($797 vs $2,412; p < 0.01) for drug administration more than offset these costs, resulting in nominally lower overall study drug administration costs for DVd versus VAd ($20,289 vs $21,692; p = 0.64). No other component of care differed significantly between the two groups (costs of other care: $14,152 for DVd vs $14,154 for VAd; p = 0.99) and overall treatment costs ($34,442 for DVd vs $35,846 for VAd; p = 0.76) were similar in the two groups. DVd patients had approximately 10 additional days of follow-up over the trial period (149.4 vs 139.2) versus VAd patients. Conclusions: Despite higher drug acquisition costs, use of DVd did not increase the overall cost of treatment compared to VAd. [Table: see text]


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 508-513
Author(s):  
Gail G. Shapiro ◽  
Joseph J. McPhillips ◽  
Kevin Smith ◽  
Clifton T. Furukawa ◽  
William E. Pierson ◽  
...  

Theophylline and terbutaline, alone and in combination, were evaluated for effectiveness in treating exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) when used at doses that should be tolerated by adolescents taking them intermittently: theophylline, 250 mg (fast release), and terbutaline, 2.5 mg. Twenty-one subjects, 12 to 19 years of age, with EIB performed standardized exercise tests on four separate days and received either theophylline, terbutaline, the combination, or placebo in a prerandomized double-blind manner prior to exercise. Exercise tests were performed two and five hours after each study drug administration. Blood samples were drawn before and again two and five hours after drug administration for theophylline level. Pulmonary function [forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and forced expiratory flow rate (FEF25% to 75%)] was recorded before and after exercise. All of the active treatments were better than placebo in diminishing EIB. The combination was statistically better than terbutaline or theophylline alone. The effect of theophylline was not significantly different from that of terbutaline. The combination induced significantly more tremor than either agent individually. Either drug alone or the two in combination is effective for diminishing EIB. Although the combination may have additive properties for some patients, the increased incidence of tremor may diminish its appeal. Either drug alone or in combination is effective in decreasing EIB for at least five hours, which makes them practical choices for treatment of school-aged children.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T-P Simon ◽  
S Doemming ◽  
A Humbs ◽  
L Martin ◽  
C Bruells ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 270-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samia Khalil ◽  
Alexander Rodarte ◽  
Craig B. Weldon ◽  
Michael Weinstein ◽  
Zvi Grunwald ◽  
...  

Background In pediatric postsurgical patients, postoperative vomiting is a common occurrence that can delay recovery and result in unplanned hospital admissions after outpatient surgery. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ondansetron in the control of established postoperative emesis in outpatients aged 2-12 yr. Methods Screened for the study were 2,720 ASA physical status 1-3 children undergoing outpatient surgery during general anesthesia, which included nitrous oxide. Children experiencing two emetic episodes within 2 h of discontinuation of nitrous oxide were given intravenous ondansetron (n = 192; 0.1 mg/kg for children weighing &lt; or = 40 kg; 4 mg for children weighing &gt; 40 kg) or placebo (n = 183). Results The proportion of children with no emetic episodes and no use of rescue medication was significantly greater (P &lt; 0.001) in the ondansetron group compared with placebo for both 2- and 24-h periods after study drug administration (78% of the ondansetron group and 34% of the placebo group for 2 h; 53% of the ondansetron group and 17% of the placebo group for 24 h). Among patients with at least one emetic episode or with rescue medication use, the median time to onset of emesis or rescue was 127 min in the ondansetron group compared with 58 min in the placebo group (P &lt; 0.001). The median time from study drug administration until discharge was significantly shorter (P &lt; 0.01) in the ondansetron group (153 min, range 44-593 min) compared with the placebo group (173 min, range 82-622 min). The incidence of potentially drug-related adverse events was similar in the ondansetron (3% of patients) and the placebo (4% of patients) groups. Conclusion A single dose of ondansetron (0.1 mg/kg up to 4 mg) is effective and well tolerated in the prevention of further episodes of postoperative emesis in children after outpatient surgery. Administration of ondansetron also may result in a shorter time to discharge.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 168-168
Author(s):  
Justin Hatchimonji ◽  
Andrew Young ◽  
Kristina Dortche ◽  
Brendon DiDonna ◽  
Elizabeth Merulla ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document