Cocaine increases stimulation-evoked serotonin efflux in the nucleus accumbens

Cocaine is one of the most common illicit drugs globally, but the role of serotonin in its mechanism of action is insufficiently characterised. Consequently, we investigated the acute effects of the psychomotor stimulant cocaine on electrical stimulation-evoked serotonin (phasic) release in the nucleus accumbens core (NAcc) of urethane-anesthetized (1.5 g/kg i.p.) male Sprague-Dawley rats using N-shaped fast-scan cyclic voltammetry (N-FSCV). A single carbon fiber microelectrode was first implanted in the NAcc. Stimulation was applied to the medial forebrain bundle using 60 Hz, 2 ms, 0.2 mA, 2 s biphasic pulses before and after cocaine (2 mg/kg i.v.) was administered. Stimulation-evoked serotonin release significantly increased 5 minutes after cocaine injection compared to baseline (153±21 nM vs 257±12 nM; p = 0.0042; n = 5) but was unaffected by saline injection (1 ml/kg i.v.; n = 5). N-FSCV's selective measurement of serotonin release in vivo was confirmed pharmacologically via administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor escitalopram (10 mg/kg i.p.) which effectively increased the signal in a separate group of rats (n = 5). Selectivity to serotonin was further confirmed in vitro in which dopamine was minimally detected by N-FSCV with a serotonin to dopamine response ratio of 1:0.04 (200 nM of serotonin:1 mM dopamine ratio; p = 0.0048; n = 5 electrodes). This study demonstrates a noteworthy influence of cocaine on serotonin dynamics, and confirms that N-FSCV can effectively and selectively measure phasic serotonin release in the NAcc.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiovascular surgery

Clinicians generally counsel patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) to avoid heparin products lifelong. Although there are now many alternative (nonheparin) anticoagulants available, heparin avoidance remains challenging for cardiac surgery. Heparin is often preferred in the cardiac surgery setting based on the vast experience with the agent, ease of monitoring, and reversibility. To “clear” a patient with a history of HIT for cardiac surgery, hematologists must first confirm the diagnosis of HIT, which can be challenging due to the ubiquity of heparin exposure and frequency of thrombocytopenia in patients in the cardiac intensive care unit. Next, the “phase of HIT” (acute HIT, subacute HIT A/B, or remote HIT) should be established based on platelet count, immunoassay for antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes, and a functional assay (eg, serotonin release assay). As long as the HIT functional assay remains positive (acute HIT or subacute HIT A), cardiac surgery should be delayed if possible. If surgery cannot be delayed, an alternative anticoagulant (preferably bivalirudin) may be used. Alternatively, heparin may be used with either preoperative/intraoperative plasma exchange or together with a potent antiplatelet agent. The optimal strategy among these options is not known, and the choice depends on institutional experience and availability of alternative anticoagulants. In the later phases of HIT (subacute HIT B or remote HIT), brief intraoperative exposure to heparin followed by an alternative anticoagulant as needed in the postoperative setting is recommended.

Liberation of Serotonin Is Not Unaffected by Acetylcholine in Rat Hippocampus

Purpose: Raised cerebral titers of acetylcholine have notable links with storage symptomatology related to lower urinary tract symptoms. The hippocampus contributes to the normal control of continence in the majority of instances (circuit 3). Owing to synaptic connections with other nerve cells, acetylcholine affects the micturition pathway via the liberation of additional cerebral neurotransmitters. Despite the fact that cerebral serotonin is a key inhibitor of reflex bladder muscle contractions, the influence of acetylcholine on its liberation is poorly delineated. The current research was conducted in order to explore the role of acetylcholine in serotonin liberation from sections of rat hippocampus in order to improve the comprehension of the relationship between cholinergic and serotonergic neurons.Methods: Hippocampal sections from 6 mature male Sprague-Dawley rats were equilibrated over a 30-minute period in standard incubation medium so as to facilitate [3H]5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) uptake. The cerebral neurotransmitter, acetylcholine, was applied to the sections. Aliquots of drained medium solution were utilized in order to quantify the radioactivity associated with [3H]5-HT liberation; any alterations in this parameter were noted.Results: When judged against the controls, [3H]5-HT liberation from the hippocampal sections remained unaltered following the administration of acetylcholine, implying that this agent has no inhibitory action on this process.Conclusions: Serotonin liberation from murine hippocampal sections is unaffected by acetylcholine. It is postulated that the bladder micturition reflex responds to acetylcholine through its immediate cholinergic activity rather than by its influence on serotonin release. These pathways are a promising target for the design of de novo therapeutic agents.

The Deglycosylated Form of 1E12, a Monoclonal Anti-PF4 IgG, Strongly Inhibits Antibody-Triggered Cellular Activation in Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia, and Is a Potential New Treatment for Vιττ

Introduction Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a severe complication of recombinant adenoviral vector vaccines used to prevent COVID-19, likely due to anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) IgG antibodies. The specificity and platelet-activating activity of VITT antibodies strikingly resemble that of antibodies detected in "autoimmune" heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), but their features remain poorly characterized. In particular, a better knowledge of these antibodies should help to understand the mechanisms leading to hypercoagulability and the particular thrombotic events observed in VITT, but rarely in typical HIT. We have recently developed a chimeric IgG1 anti-PF4 antibody, 1E12, which strongly mimics "autoimmune" HIT antibodies in terms of specificity and cellular effects. Therefore, we assessed whether 1E12 could mimic VITT antibodies. We then evaluated the capability of DG-1E12, a deglycosylated form of 1E12 unable to bind FcγR, to inhibit cellular activation induced by VITT antibodies. Methods and Results Using a PF4-sensitized serotonin release assay (PF4-SRA) (Vayne C, New Engl J Med, 2021), we demonstrated that 1E12 (5 and 10 μg/mL) strongly activated platelets, with a pattern similar to that obtained with human VITT samples (n=7), i.e. in a PF4-dependent manner and without heparin. This platelet activation was inhibited by low heparin concentration (0.5 IU/mL), an effect also observed with VITT samples. Serotonin release induced by 1E12 was also fully inhibited by IV-3, a monoclonal antibody blocking FcγRIIa, or by IdeS, a bacterial protease that cleaves IgG and strongly inhibits the binding of IgG antibodies to FcγRIIa. This inhibitory effect of IV-3 and IdeS strongly supports that interactions between pathogenic anti-PF4 IgG and FcγRIIa play a central role in VITT. Incubation of 1E12 or VITT samples with isolated neutrophils (PMN) and platelets with PF4 (10 µg/mL) strongly induced DNA release and NETosis, supporting that PMN are involved in the processes leading to thrombosis in VITT. Furthermore, when whole blood from healthy donors incubated with 1E12 or VITT plasma was perfused in capillaries coated with von Willebrand Factor, numerous large platelet/leukocyte aggregates containing fibrin(ogen) were formed. To investigate whether 1E12 and VITT antibodies recognize overlapping epitopes on PF4, we then performed competitive assays with a deglycosylated form of 1E12 (DG-1E12), still able to bind PF4 but not to interact with Fcγ receptors. In PF4-SRA, pre-incubation of DG-1E12 (50 µg/mL) dramatically reduced platelet activation induced by VITT antibodies, which was fully abrogated for 9 of the 14 VITT samples tested. Additional experiments using a whole blood PF4-enhanced flow cytometry assay recently designed for VITT diagnosis (Handtke et al, Blood 2021), confirmed that DG-1E12 fully prevented platelet activation induced by VITT antibodies. Moreover, when platelets and neutrophils were pre-incubated with DG-1E12 (100 µg/mL), NETosis and thus DNA release, nuclear rounding, and DNA decondensation induced by VITT antibodies were completely inhibited. Finally, DG-1E12 (100 µg/mL) also fully abolished VITT antibody-mediated thrombus formation in whole blood in vitro under vein flow conditions. Comparatively, DG-1E12 did not inhibit ALB6, a murine monoclonal anti-CD9 antibody, which also strongly activates platelets in a FcγRIIa-dependent manner. Conclusions Our results show that 1E12 exhibits features similar to those of human VITT antibodies in terms of specificity, affinity and cellular effects, and could therefore be used as a model antibody to study the pathophysiology of VITT. Our data also demonstrate that DG-1E12 prevents blood cell activation and thrombus formation induced by VITT antibodies, likely due to the competitive effect of its Fab fragment on antibody binding to PF4. DG-1E12 may allow the development of a new drug neutralizing the pathogenic effect of autoimmune anti-PF4 antibodies, such as those associated with VITT. Disclosures Thiele: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other; Bayer: Honoraria; Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Other; Novo Nordisk: Other; Novartis: Honoraria; Daichii Sankyo: Other. Pouplard: Stago: Research Funding. Greinacher: Macopharma: Honoraria; Biomarin/Prosensa: Other, Research Funding; Sagent: Other, Research Funding; Rovi: Other, Research Funding; Gore inc.: Other, Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Other, Research Funding; Paringenix: Other, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Aspen: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Portola: Other; Ergomed: Other; Instrument Laboratory: Honoraria; Chromatec: Honoraria. Gruel: Stago: Other: symposium fees, Research Funding. Rollin: Stago: Research Funding.

No Diagnostic Utility of Zero Heparin Control Buffer in Serotonin Release Assay: Findings from a Validation Study

Background: Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare immune mediated complication that is triggered in a subset of patients temporal to therapeutic heparin exposure. Laboratory testing is based on screening for the presence of serum anti-PF4 antibodies using sensitive solid-phase immunoassays. If antibodies are detected, functional testing to demonstrate the platelet activating properties and heparin dependence of these immune complexes is then performed. Previous studies have reported possible clinical utility in identifying non heparin dependent platelet activating antibodies using a buffer control with zero heparin in the serotonin release functional assay (SRA). These reports suggested a correlation between reactivity in the zero heparin buffer control and pathogenicity of HIT antibodies which may define a subtype of HIT, referred to as autoimmune HIT. We aimed to investigate the utility of zero heparin buffer control as a part of an inhouse validation study of a mass spectrometry-coupled SRA (Mayo-SRA). Methods: Three hundred archived serum samples were tested using anti-PF4 IgG antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Immucor Diagnostics, GA, USA). SRA was preformed on all samples using Mayo-SRA and reference 14C SRA methods. Zero heparin control buffer was included in the Mayo-SRA assay. Serotonin release >20% in the low dose heparin (0.1U/mL, LDH) and ELISA optical density (OD) >0.4 were considered positive. Drug interference studies were performed by spiking known SRA-positive samples with increasing concentrations of unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux in the LDH and zero heparin SRA. The clinical 4T score was calculated retrospectively calculated for all patients. Results: Of the 300 tested samples, 57 were anti-PF4 ELISA positive. 33 of the 57 samples were positive using the reference 14C SRA method. Whereas 43 samples were positive by Mayo-SRA assay. Three additional samples were positive by Mayo-SRA, but negative by both screening anti-PF4 ELISA and the reference SRA method (Fig- 1A). Lastly, 13 samples were anti-PF4 ELISA positive, but SRA negative by both methods in comparison. Interestingly, 44 of 46 (95%) samples interpreted positive by LDH were also interpreted positive (serotonin release >20%) under zero heparin conditions. These included the 3 samples that were positive by Mayo-SRA but negative by both screening anti-PF4 ELISA and the reference SRA. The overall % serotonin release using zero heparin control was significantly lower (P= 0.003, paired Student T-test) compared to LDH (Fig-1B). In addition, zero heparin followed a similar pattern as LDH, with highest levels at ELISA OD units >2 (Fig-1C). Strikingly, drug interference studies showed artifactual serotonin release in the zero heparin reaction, which was not detected in the absence of spiked drugs. For UFH, serotonin release in zero heparin control occurred at very low spiked concentrations, ≥0.063 U/mL. LMWH and fondaparinux spiking experiments also displayed similar zero heparin serotonin release patterns (Fig-1D). Of note, none of these interferences were detected in UFH spiked SRA-negative samples (data not shown). Conclusion: Contrary to prior results suggesting that less than 50% of LDH SRA positive samples are also positive in the zero heparin SRA, our results show high zero heparin SRA positivity rate of >95%. Zero heparin SRA showed a pattern with highest levels at ELISA OD units >2 suggesting that reactivity in this condition is a function of antibody strength rather than a qualitative difference (i.e. "autoimmune" HIT antibodies vs "non-autoimmune" HIT antibodies). In addition, contamination of patient sera with small amounts of remnant heparin can significantly impact platelet activation in the zero heparin SRA test. Thus, zero heparin SRA positive results may be artifactual and represent residual heparin contained in the patient sample. Figure legend: Fig-1A. Scatter plots of SRA positive samples grouped by 4T scores. Red dots are Mayo-SRA only positive samples. Fig-1B and Fig-1C. Scatter plots of % serotonin release of Mayo-SRA positive samples at LDH (circles) vs. zero heparin buffers (squares), and grouped by ELISA OD values, respectively. Fig-1D. % Serotonin release of known SRA-positive samples spiked with increasing concentrations of UFH, LMWH, or fondaparinux at LDH (white) or zero heparin buffers (red). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pruthi: CSL Behring: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; Bayer Healthcare AG: Honoraria; HEMA Biologics: Honoraria; Instrumentation Laboratory: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Padmanabhan: Veralox Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Determining the Rate of Anti-PF4 Antibody Positive Results in Patients Presenting with Venous Thrombosis but a Normal Platelet Count Following ChAdOx1 Ncov-19 Astrazeneca Vaccination: An Australian Combined State Testing Centre Experience

Introduction The CHaDOx1 nCov-19 AstraZeneca (AZ) vaccination has been associated with an antibody-mediated prothrombotic syndrome, termed "Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome" (TTS)[1-3]. The current diagnostic criteria for TTS are thrombosis (venous or arterial) within 4-42 days of AZ vaccine, thrombocytopenia and presence of an antibody to platelet factor 4 (PF4)[4, 5]. TTS commonly presents with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) or splanchnic vessel thrombosis (SVT), but outside of TTS, CVST and SVT are uncommon, with an overall incidence of less than 0.5 per 100,000 [5-7]. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are also associated with TTS, however the background incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is much higher, with 1-2 events per 1000 patients per year[7, 8]. Therefore, many patients will present with new VTE and a recent exposure to the AZ vaccine, requiring consideration of investigation for TTS. Recent data suggests that PF4 antibodies can be seen in up to 8% of patients without thrombosis but following AZ vaccination[9]. We hypothesised in patients with recent AZ vaccination, new VTE but with a normal platelet count, that the incidence of a PF4 antibody is similar to this background rate of PF4 positivity. If confirmed, then presence of a normal platelet count despite new VTE and recent vaccination may exclude TTS without the need for PF4 antibody testing. We present our preliminary data on the rates of PF4 antibody positivity amongst patients with VTE, recent AZ vaccination and a normal platelet count at presentation. Aim and Methods To assess the incidence of PF4 ELISA positive results in patients with confirmed VTE, recent vaccination (within 4-42 days) with the first dose of AZ vaccine, and platelet count greater than 150x10 9/L. A retrospective audit of cases referred with suspected TTS to Monash Pathology, Melbourne, Victoria, and New South Wales Health Pathology at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and St George Hospital sites Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, for testing for anti PF4 antibodies from 1 st April to 31 st July 2021. Patient sera were tested for the Anti-PF4 antibody using the STAGO Asserachrom HPIA IgG ELISA (Asnières sur Seine, France). For patients with a positive PF4 antibody test additional testing was sought for either the presence of platelet activating antibodies with a flow cytometry-based assay or the presence of spontaneous serotonin release without heparin in the serotonin release assay. Results From April 1 st to July 31 st 350 tests were run on 332 patients. 91 patients met our criteria, of whom 51 were female and 40 male, with a median age of 73 years. Median platelet count at presentation was 226x10 9/L, and median D dimer values were 10 times the upper limit of normal. 86 patients had either DVT, PE or both, including 2 with upper limb DVT, and 5 patients had PE with concurrent arterial events (1 axillary artery thrombosis, 3 arterial strokes, 1 coronary artery thrombosis). Further details are presented in table 1. 82 patient samples tested negative for anti-PF4 antibodies by ELISA, 5 were positive, and were 4 weak positive/equivocal (see table 2 for further details). Of the positive results, 3 had functional testing available, of which 2 were negative, and 1 showed discordant results, with a positive SRA but negative flow cytometry. None of the weak positive/equivocal cases had functional testing results available. Of the negative ELISA results, 5 patients had functional testing results available, of which 4 were negative. One of these cases had positive testing by flow cytometry, but negative by SRA (case included in table 2). Conclusion In our Australian cohort of patients with their first dose of AZ vaccine and new VTE within 4-42days, but a normal platelet count (therefore not fulfilling the clinical criteria of TTS), the incidence of a positive PF4 antibody test was 9/91 (9.9%, 95% CI 3.7-15.9%) and only one had evidence of platelet activating antibodies. This observed rate is similar to that observed in healthy patients without thrombosis who received AZ vaccination as described by Thiele et. al., 2021. Further confirmation in a larger cohort of VTE patients is required, but if confirmed, then PF4 ELISA testing in patients with VTE and normal platelet count post AZ vaccine may not be required, and should give clinicians confidence to institute routine management. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Diagnostic Utility of High Dose Heparin Confirmation Step in Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ELISA Assay

Introduction: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially life-threatening condition that could occur following exposure to heparin. Accurate and timely diagnosis is critical for appropriate clinical management. Laboratory testing for suspected cases is based on screening for the presence of serum anti-PF4/heparin antibodies using solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELSIA) which is known to be sensitive but less specific. A positive ELISA test is followed by functional testing to demonstrate the platelet activating properties and heparin dependence of the pathogenic antibodies. Serotonin release assay (SRA) is considered the gold standard functional test for the diagnosis of HIT. In most anti-PF4/heparin ELISA assays, a high-dose heparin buffer (100U/mL) confirmation step is recommended to demonstrate heparin dependence of detected antibodies and increase the specificity of the assay. The necessity of this confirmation step is controversial with some reports suggesting it could lead to misinterpreting positive ELISA results as negative or indeterminate, especially in cases of very strong and high titer HIT activating antibodies. We hence aimed to investigate the utility of applying this confirmation step as part of an inhouse validation study of a mass spectrometry-coupled SRA (Mayo-SRA). Materials: Three hundred archived serum samples were tested using anti-PF4/heparin IgG antibody ELISA (Immucor Diagnostics, GA, USA). High-dose heparin (100U/mL) confirmation step was performed on all samples with OD units ≥0.4 as recommended by the manufacturer. Samples with OD ≥ 0.4 and ≥50% OD inhibition in the high dose heparin confirmation step are interpreted positive. Mayo-SRA results were compared to a reference 14C SRA method. The 4T clinical score was retrospectively calculated for all patient (range 0-8 points). Results: Of the 300 tested samples, 57 samples were interpreted positive by the anti-PF4/heparin screening ELISA. 33 of the 57 samples were positive using the reference 14C SRA method, whereas 43 samples were positive by Mayo-SRA assay (≥20% serotonin release). Three additional samples were positive by Mayo-SRA, but negative by both screening ELISA and the reference 14C SRA method. All samples with OD units ≥0.4 displayed >50% inhibition in the high-dose heparin regardless of the intensity of the initial OD value or the HIT 4T score, with the exception of one that was negative by both SRA methods and of 1.35 OD value and 6 4T HIT score (Fig-1A). Importantly, thirteen samples were anti-PF4/heparin positive, but SRA negative (by Mayo-SRA and reference method). These samples also displayed positive %heparin inhibition (≥50% OD inhibition) (Fig-1B). Lastly, there were no differences in the degree of %inhibition in samples positive by both reference and Mayo-SRA or Mayo-SRA only (Fig-1B). Conclusion: In our patient cohort, addition of the high dose heparin inhibition confirmation step to the screening anti-PF4/heparin ELISA assay was of no additional diagnostic utility. We hence propose eliminating the heparin inhibition step which would improve laboratory turnaround time, reduce costs, and importantly speed up urgent clinical management decisions. Figure Legend: Fig-1A. No correlation between initial OD values and %OD inhibition using high dose heparin. Scatter plot of all ELISA positive samples (OD ≥0.4) grouped according to OD values. Samples include all SRA-positive and thirteen SRA-negative ELISA-positive samples. Fig-1B. Scatter plot of %OD inhibition comparing samples positive by Mayo-SRA and reference SRA method, positive by Mayo-SRA only, and ELISA-positive SRA-negative by both methods. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pruthi: Bayer Healthcare AG: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; HEMA Biologics: Honoraria; Instrumentation Laboratory: Honoraria. Padmanabhan: Veralox Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Testing: ELISA Based Anti-Platelet Factor 4 Polyspecific and IgG-Specific Antibody Detection Assays Compared to the Unfractionated Heparin Serotonin Release Assay

Introduction: Antibodies that cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can be detected with either antigenic or functional assays. Previously, it has been shown that antigenic (ELISA based) assays that detect anti-platelet factor 4 (anti-PF4) IgG, IgM, or IgA (polyspecific) antibodies are more sensitive but less specific than functional assays such as the unfractionated serotonin release assay (UFH SRA), and that the use of anti-PF4 assays that detect IgG antibodies only, would increase the specificity but decrease the sensitivity of these assays for the detection of HIT antibodies that are prothrombotic (associated with positive functional assay). To date large epidemiologic studies have not confirm these findings. To evaluate the relative performance of anti-PF4 polyspecific and IgG-specific antibodies in their ability to detect prothrombotic HIT antibodies, we evaluated results of non-reflexive HIT panels that contained either anti-PF4 polyspecific or IgG-specific assays and unfractionated heparin serotonin release assays over an eight-year period at a U.S. reference laboratory. Methods: Test results for 2 HIT detection panels were compared: 1 panel had UFH SRA plus the polyspecific PF4 ENHANCED® assay (GTI Diagnostics, Waukesha, WI) and 1 panel had UFH SRA plus the IgG-specific Zymutest HIA IgG assay (Hyphen Biomed, France). Test results were from the last 4 years of use for each panel (2009 to 2012 for the polyspecific panel; 2017 to 2020 for the IgG-specific panel). UFH SRA was performed as described by Sheridan et al, (1986) with positivity defined as ≥20% serotonin release by low dose UFH and >50% suppression of release at high dose (100 U/mL) UFH. For each year and assay, test results were stratified by optical density (OD) results, and the percent of results positive by UFH SRA was determined for each OD range. Median yearly UFH SRA positivity rates for each OD interval were compared for anti-PF4 polyspecific vs IgG-specific antibody assays using non-parametric statistical testing, Mann-Whitney U test, two-tailed, with significance defined as <0.05. Results: HIT panels with either ELISA based assays detecting either anti-PF4 polyspecific or IgG specific antibodies demonstrated increasing UFH SRA positivity rates as OD increased. Approximately 50% UFH SRA positivity occurred when OD was in the 2.000 to range. No significant differences in SRA positivity were seen at any positive OD interval when comparing anti-PF4 polyspecific vs IgG-specific assays. A small but significant difference was seen when OD results were considered This observation may have been due to a in the review process (2017-2020): when a UFH SRA result was positive with a negative OD result, repeat UFH SRA testing was performed. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the correlations of UFH SRA positivity and OD measurements are similar for anti-PF4 IgG-specific and polyspecific antibody assays. These results suggest the assay types may perform similarly for the detection of HIT and importantly provide important predictive information as to when an optical density value will lead to a positive UFH SRA result. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wong: Quest Diagnostics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Worfolk: Quest Diagnostics: Current Employment. Bi: Quest Diagnostics: Current Employment. Noh: Quest Diagnostics: Current Employment. Espinoza: Quest Diagnostics: Current Employment. Wu: Quest Diagnostics: Current Employment. Sahud: Quest Diagnostics: Current Employment. Racke: Quest Diagnostics: Current Employment. Dlott: Quest Diagnostics: Current Employment.

Staged Management of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia for Renal Cavo-Atrial Cancer Removal on Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Management of patients with acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with cavo-atrial renal cancer requiring surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and possible deep hypothermia circulatory arrest is a challenge. A staged approach using Bivalirudin, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was used to preoperatively de-escalate HIT guided by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and serotonin release assay (SRA). Intraoperatively heparin was used as the anticoagulant for CPB as DHCA was likely to be used to remove the atrio-caval tumor. Heparin is effective in preventing clots in the circuit during DHCA. To prevent HIT upon re-exposure to heparin during CPB, a bolus of a Cangrelor (reversible P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibitor) was given before heparin and during CPB whilst platelet activity was monitored using platelet reactivity units (PRU). Postoperatively, to prevent recurrence of HIT, plasmapheresis was used until SRA and optical density (OD) resulted. The patient had a successful outcome.

A serotonergic axon-cilium synapse drives nuclear signaling to maintain chromatin accessibility

Chemical synapses between axons and dendrites mediate much of the brain's intercellular communication. Here we describe a new kind of synapse - the axo-ciliary synapse - between axons and primary cilia. By employing enhanced focused ion beam - scanning electron microscopy on samples with optimally preserved ultrastructure, we discovered synapses between the serotonergic axons arising from the brainstem, and the primary cilia of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Functionally, these cilia are enriched in a ciliary-restricted serotonin receptor, 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 6 (HTR6), whose mutation is associated with learning and memory defects. Using a newly developed cilia-targeted serotonin sensor, we show that optogenetic stimulation of serotonergic axons results in serotonin release onto cilia. Ciliary HTR6 stimulation activates a non-canonical GNAQ/11-RhoA pathway. Ablation of this pathway results in nuclear actin and chromatin accessibility changes in CA1 pyramidal neurons. Axo-ciliary synapses serve as a distinct mechanism for neuromodulators to program neuron transcription through privileged access to the nuclear compartment.