Impact of Increased Body Weight on Acute Toxicity and Outcome of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: A Southwest Oncology Group Analysis.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 352-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Stiff ◽  
Joseph Unger ◽  
Stephen Forman ◽  
Michael LeBlanc ◽  
Thomas Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Actual Body ◽  
Death Rate ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Actual Body Weight ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Little is known about the optimal dosing of chemotherapy agents in patients significantly above their ideal body weight (IBW) who undergo high dose therapy with an autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. While dose attenuation is often advocated for overweight patients and appears to reduce acute toxicities, its effect on progression-free and overall survival (PFS/OS) is unknown. Due to a high relapse rate after autografts for relapsed/refractory NHL, SWOG has long investigated the use of augmented preparative regimens that utilize high-dose etoposide based on actual body weight (ABW) of 60 mg/kg, along with 12 Gy of TBI and cyclophosphamide (100 mg/kg) which is dosed on unadjusted IBW. We determined acute toxicities and PFS/OS using this approach in a recently completed study (S9438) of 358 patients undergoing autografts for relapsed/refractory NHL, comparing all grade 5 toxicities, grade 3–4 skin toxicities (known to be associated with high dose etoposide) and all other grade 4 toxicities in patients in this study based on % above IBW. The Devine formula for IBW with an adjustment for patients <5 feet was used. Patients at or below their IBW were dosed using their actual body weight. All patients received the preparative regimen as stated followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cells. Overall there were 31 patients with grade 5 toxicities. This group was a mean 42% above their IBW vs 24% for those surviving transplant (p=.001). Increasing % above IBW predicted grade 5 toxicity (p=.002). Even those at or 10% above their IBW had a higher toxic death rate (10.1 vs 3.6%; p=.04). While increasing weight above IBW did not predict for grade 4 lung, liver, cardiac toxicities or infections (p=.12), it did predict for grade 3/4 skin toxicities (p< .001). Skin toxicity, most commonly hand/foot syndrome was seen at rates up to 27.3% vs 7.3% for those ≥ 50 vs < 50% over IBW (p < .001). However, even those just ≥ 10% over IBW had nearly a 4 fold higher risk of skin toxicity (13.4 vs 3.6%; p=.005). While survival by % over IBW is confounded by comorbidities in overweight patients, we found no evidence of a different 2-year PFS or OS for overweight patients, even those ≥ 50% above IBW (PFS=42 vs 45%, p = .28; OS=52 vs 62%, p = .38). These multicenter trial data do establish a correlation of the ABW dosing of etoposide with significant skin toxicity. Without an apparent later PFS/OS benefit to the use of unadjusted etoposide dosing for overweight patients but higher acute skin toxicity and a higher early death rate, etoposide will be dosed using adjusted IBW [ IBW + .4 (ABW − IBW)] in subsequent studies of this regimen.

Implications of Body Weight Calculations for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5445-5445
Author(s):  
Lijo Simpson ◽  
Robert C. Wolfe ◽  
Dennis A. Gastineau ◽  
William J. Hogan ◽  
Shaji Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Actual Body ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Ideal Body Weight ◽  
The Body ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Actual Body Weight ◽  
Cell Dose ◽  
Ideal Body

Abstract Background: Obesity is a prevalent health problem and significant heterogeneity is seen in the body weight and BMI among adult patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). At least two critical steps of the SCT are influenced by the body weight. Stem cell collection targets are usually determined based on the actual body weight and conditioning chemotherapy doses are usually determined based on corrected ideal body weight. One could hypothesize that since the stem cells home to bone marrow, the ideal body weight (IBW) being based on the height may be a better indicator of the stem cell numbers required rather than the actual body weight (ABW). Since chemotherapy doses are calculated based on corrected ideal body weight, and the volume of distribution is higher in obese patients, these patients may have decreased drug exposure and hence a higher risk of progression. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the engraftment kinetics and response outcome of 306 SCTs done at our institution between March 1998 and October 2001. These included patients who had undergone SCT for multiple myeloma (46%), NHL (34%), HD (6%) and AL amyloidosis (14%). Body weight, height, stem cell dose and engraftment data was obtained from medical records. The stem cell dose received was calculated based on their ABW as well as IBW and correlated with the time to white cell and platelet engraftment. We also evaluated the effect of BMI on the progression free survival after the stem cell transplant using various cut offs. Results: The mean (range) for the ABW, IBW and BMI were 46.6 kg to 189 Kg; 45.5 kg to 94 kg; and 17.5 to 55.8 respectively. Using logistic regression, we estimated the ability of CD34 cell dose by actual and ideal body weight to predict the likelihood of platelet engraftment (50,000) by day 21 post transplant. The coefficients using both the doses were very similar (.391 for ideal and 0.361 for actual). Using Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC analysis); we determined the stem cell dose cutoff that best predicted for failure to engraft neutrophils by 21 days post transplantation, median CD34 dose by ABW of 3.6 million/Kg and by IBW of 4.2 million/Kg. Similarly, for failure to engraft platelets by day 30 the cutoffs were 2.89 million/Kg by actual weight and 3.77 million/kg by ideal weight. Among the individuals with actual body weight more than 25% of ideal body weight (n=122, 40%), we calculated the optimal total CD34 dose required and compared to the actual dose infused using both the cutoff sets (286 million vs. 446 million, P < 0.001 using ANC cutoff and 251 million vs. 446 million using the platelet cutoff, P < 0.001). We then examined the effect of BMI on progression free and overall survival from transplant. The progression free and overall survival post transplant was similar for patients with BMI over 30 kg/m2 compared to those below this cutoff. There was no difference when patients with myeloma or lymphoma were studied separately. Conclusion: This study, as in previous studies, confirms that stem cell dose determined on the basis of ideal body weight is comparable to that by actual body weight in terms of engraftment kinetics. In patients significantly above the ideal body weight, it is reasonable to use a target based on ideal body weight which will allow for collection of less numbers of CD34 cells, thus conserving resources. Among patient undergoing stem cell transplant, the practice of using corrected ideal body weight does not appear to compromise the outcome of stem cell transplant.

Combination Therapy with BCNU/Etoposide/Melphalan (BEM) as Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant In Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4587-4587
Author(s):  
Shanshan Liu ◽  
Ann Mohrbacher ◽  
Dan Douer ◽  
Vishesh R Kothary ◽  
Lisa Hanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Bone Lesions ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Lytic Bone Lesions

Abstract Abstract 4587 Background: High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains an important therapeutic modality for MM patients. Traditionally high-dose single agent melphalan (200 mg/m2; Mel-200) has been used as the conditioning regimen prior to ASCT for MM. We investigated the combination regimen of BCNU, etoposide and melphalan (BEM) in this setting at our center. Methods: All patients who had undergone ASCT for MM utilizing BEM conditioning regimen at Norris Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles were eligible. BEM consisted of BCNU 12 mg/kg (actual body weight or ideal body weight whichever was lower) iv on day -5, etoposide 60 mg/Kg iv on day -3, and melphalan 140 mg/m2 iv on day -1, prior to stem cell reinfusion on day 0. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from MM diagnosis to death, or in patients still alive, the date of last follow-up. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as time from ASCT to date of relapse, or in patients without documented relapse, date of death or last follow up, whichever was sooner. Survival for patients with different clinical and disease-specific characteristics was explored using logrank test. Response was assessed according to International Uniform Response Criteria for MM. Results: A total of 44 MM patients underwent ASCT utilizing the BEM conditioning regimen. Of these, evaluable data was available for 42 patients (25 males; 60%, 17 females; 40%) with a median follow up of 27.6 mths. Median age at diagnosis was 54.5 yr (range 34–68) while median time from MM diagnosis to ASCT was 10.5 mths (range 2.8–47.8). MM subtypes included IgA (n=5, 12%), IgG (n=30, 71%) and light chain-only (n=7, 17%). Median bone marrow (BM) plasmacytosis at diagnosis was 42.5% (range 0%-100%). Durie-Salmon (DS) stages included stage I (12%), II (36%) and III (52%), while 4 patients (10%) had renal dysfunction at the time of initial MM diagnosis. Majority of the patients (71%) had lytic bone lesions at the time of diagnosis and 86% (n=36) hade secretory disease. Patients had received a median of 1 prior treatment (range 1–5), while 23 (55%) patients had received novel agents (proteasome inhibitors or IMiDs) prior to the BEM regimen. Response rates prior to and after the regimen are summarized in Table 1. After BEM-ASCT an additional 16 (38%) patients achieved a CR. Median duration of hospitalization and time to engraftment were 19 days (range 15–41) and 10.5 days (range 7–19), respectively. One patient died prior to discharge from the hospital post ASCT (Day 36 post ASCT) for a treatment related mortality of 2%. CR rate post BEM-ASCT was 64% with an ORR of 97%. Relapses have been noted in 25 patients to date. Median OS for all patients was 4.9 yrs (5.6 yrs for patients in CR and 6.6 yrs for patients in PR after BEM-ASCT). Median PFS was 23.9 mths for all patients (25 mths for patients in CR and 21.8 mths for those in PR after BEM-ASCT). No statistically significant differences were noted in OS based on patient gender (p=0.47), age at diagnosis (< or ≥60 yr), MM subtype (p=0.52), DS stage at diagnosis (0.09), patients without lytic bone lesions at diagnosis (p=0.054), secretor status (p=0.2), response status at the time of BEM-ASCT (p=0.9) or prior exposure to novel agents (p=0.62). Conclusions: BEM is a well-tolerated conditioning regimen prior to ASCT in MM and has efficacy comparable to Mel-200. BEM can be effectively employed in patients where Mel-200 is not feasible. We are particularly intrigued by its ability to deliver high CR rates (64%) compared to <30% (historical control). Very encouraging median OS (4.9 yr) and PFS (23.9 mth) rates were noted which were even better in patients who had a measurable response after this regimen. Further investigations will be needed to optimally define its potential as standard conditioning regimen in MM patients undergoing ASCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Cryotherapy Reduces Mucositis in Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving High-Dose Melphalan Conditioning Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4265-4265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mabel Rodriguez ◽  
Nelly G. Adel ◽  
Sean Devlin ◽  
Sergio A Giralt ◽  
Heather Landau
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
High Dose Melphalan ◽  
Hospital Days ◽  
Severe Mucositis

Abstract Abstract 4265 Background: High-dose melphalan (MEL) followed by autologous stem cell support has been an integral component of multiple myeloma (MM) therapy since the 1980's. In general, high-dose melphalan is well-tolerated however grade 3 and 4 mucositis has been reported in up to 75% of patients (Lilleby et al. Bone Marrow Transpl, 2006). The efficacy of cryotherapy in preventing mucositis was initially documented in patients receiving infusional 5- fluorouracil (Rubenstein et al. Cancer, 2004). It is presumed that vasoconstriction reduces exposure of the oral mucosa to chemotherapy. Due to similar pharmacokinetic properties of melphalan including its short half life, cryotherapy has been used in MM patients undergoing MEL and stem cell transplant (SCT) with small series and one randomized trial supporting its use (Lilleby et al. Bone Marrow Transpl, 2006). At Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, ice chips administered for 30 minutes before, during and after melphalan administration was adopted in March 2011 for all MM patients receiving MEL (≥ 140 mg/m2). In this study we sought to determine if the incidence of mucositis has been reduced since instituting cryotherapy into our standard practice. Methods: We retrospectively identified MM patients who received MEL 140 or 200 mg/m2 prior to SCT between January 1, 2009 and June 12, 2012 using our pharmacy database and electronic medical record. We analyzed two groups of patients by date of SCT and confirmed that patients transplanted prior to 3/2011 did not receive cryotherapy while all others did. Mucositis grade was recorded as documented by medical staff or determined by the investigators using the CTCAE version 4 criteria. Disease and treatment characteristics were collected in addition to narcotic use, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) requirement, and days of hospitalization. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the proportion of patients with mucositis, severe mucositis (defined as grade 3 or higher) and those requiring patient controlled analgesia (PCA), by cryotherapy use. Logistic regression was used to adjust for prior radiation and the number of prior lines of therapy. The number of hospital days was compared using a t-test. Results: During the study period, 214 patients underwent one or more autologous SCTs for MM; for patients who had more than one, only the initial SCT was included in this analysis. Of 214 patients, 85 (40%) received cryotherapy of whom 34% developed mucositis compared to 47% who did not receive cryotherapy (P = 0.08). Grade 3 mucositis was seen in 2% and 16% of patients who did and did not receive cryotherapy respectively (P = 0.004). No patient in either group developed grade 4 mucositis. After adjusting for radiation and lines of prior therapy the association between grade 3 mucositis and cryotherapy remained significant (OR: 0.13 (0.02, 0.47); P = 0.01). PCA use was lower in patients who received cryotherapy (19%) compared to those who did not (37%) (P = 0.01), with the median duration of use being 5 days in both groups. TPN was not required for any patient. Hospital days were similar in both groups (P = 0.88). Conclusion: Cryotherapy administration at the time of high-dose melphalan reduces the incidence of severe mucositis and PCA use. Cryotherapy is readily available and should be offered to all MM patients receiving ≥ 140 mg/m2 of melphalan. Disclosures: Landau: Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding.

Chemotherapy Dose Adjustment For Obese Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): A Survey On Behalf Of The ALWP Of The EBMT

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4535-4535
Author(s):  
Noga Shem-Tov ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Leila Moukhtari ◽  
Fabio Ciceri ◽  
Jordi Esteve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Actual Body ◽  
Dose Adjustment ◽  
Ideal Body Weight ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Actual Body Weight ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Chemotherapy Dose ◽  
Ideal Body

Rates of obesity have substantially increased in recent years. Pharmacokinetics of drugs including chemotherapy is different in obese patients due to alteration in the clearance and volume of distribution. Thus, appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese patients with malignant diseases is a significant issue. Limiting chemotherapy doses in overweight and obese patients may negatively influence the outcomes in these patients. ASCO has recently published clinical practice guidelines for conventional chemotherapy dosing for obese patients with cancer indicating that up to 40% of obese patients received reduced chemotherapy doses that are not based on actual body weight (ABW) [Grigg A, JCO 2012]. Concerns about toxicity or overdosing in obese patients, based on the use of ABW, are unfounded. Moreover, there is a paucity of information addressing the pharmacokinetics of high dose chemotherapy in obese patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A rather small international survey of drug dosing schemes among transplant centers revealed that there is no consensus regarding appropriate dose adjustment for obese patients [Grigg A, Leuk Lymphoma 1997]. Also, there is limited data on outcomes in obese versus non-obese patients in various small retrospective studies. For this reason, the ALWP of the EBMT constructed an electronic survey for assessing current practice of dose adjustment of chemotherapy in patients undergoing HSCT, in transplant centers and for planning retrospective analysis and prospective studies in the future. Fifty six EBMT centers from 27 countries filled the online survey. Among the 56 centers, the percentage of obese patients was less than 10% in 22 centers (40%), between 10 to 19% in 23 centers (42%) and more than 20% in 10 centers (17%). Forty five centers declared they adjust chemotherapy dose for obese patients (80.5%) and only 11 (19.5%) declared they do not adjust dose. Among centers which adjust dose, most uses BMI as the parameter for defining obesity (28 centers, 62%), others use percentage over the actual body weight (ABW) as the basis for defining obesity (11 centers, 24.5%), both BMI and ABW (3 centers, 6.7%) or other parameter (3 centers, 6.7%). Most of the centers that use BMI for adjusting dose define BMI > 30 kg/m2 as the cut-off value (formal definition for obesity), only one center uses morbid obesity (BMI > 40 kg/m2), and the remainder uses other cut-off values. Among 11 centers who use ABW, 9 use ABW more than 120% of ideal body weight for adjustment. Eighty four percents of the centers use one level of obesity for adjustment while the rest uses 2 levels. The method for determining the weight for chemotherapy calculation was actual body weight (ABW) in 16 centers, ideal body weight (IBW) in 10 centers, IBW + 25% of difference between IBW and ABW (IBW+0.25*(ABW-IBW)) in 16 centers and other methods in the rest. Among centers that use dose adjustment, 44% also cap the dose at 2 m2 for chemotherapy dose based on BSA while 56% do not cap. On the contrary, most of the centers (9/11) that do not adjust dose for weight also do not cap the BSA at 2 m2. Seventy nine percents of responding centers use the same approach to dose adjustments for myeloablative, reduced intensity (RIC) or non myeloablative (NMA) conditioning, while 21% reduce the dose less for RIC or NMA conditioning. For Busulfan dose only 7 centers monitor pharmacokinetics (pk). Eleven centers use ideal body weight for calculation, 17 centers use actual weight and 18 centers correct weight according to percentage over actual body weight. Conclusion This EBMT survey reveal large diversity among transplant centers regarding dose adjustment practice for high dose conditioning chemotherapy. Most of the EBMT centers use dose adjustment for obese patients and about half of them also cap BSA at 2 m2, while capping is uncommon in the centers that do not adjust dose. Thus, the range of the final dose is very wide. Even for Busulfan where dose is calculated normally according to ideal body weight, the diversity of dose given for obese patients is wide. Our next step is to analyze outcomes of transplantation according to dose adjustment practice and subsequently to formulate a methodology for future prospective studies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Phase III Intergroup Study of Lenalidomide (CC-5013) Versus Placebo Maintenance Therapy Following Single Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Myeloma (CALGB 100104): Initial Report of Patient Accrual and Adverse Events.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3416-3416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip L. McCarthy ◽  
Kouros Owzar ◽  
Edward A. Stadtmauer ◽  
Sergio Giralt ◽  
David D Hurd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3416 Poster Board III-304 Relapse and/or progression of disease are the primary causes of treatment failure after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). The primary objective of CALGB 100104 was to investigate whether adding maintenance therapy would improve the time to progression (TTP). The study was powered to detect an improvement of 9.6 months (prolongation of TTP from 24 months to 33.6 months) in MM patients undergoing a single ASCT. Secondary objectives were the Complete Response conversion rate following maintenance initiation, the Overall Survival and the feasibility of long term lenalidomide maintenance therapy. Eligible MM patients were Durie-Salmon Stage I-III patients within 1 year of diagnosis, receiving at least 2 months of any induction therapy with response (Stable Disease (SD) or better) and ≤ 70 years of age. Patients with progressive disease prior to ASCT were not eligible for study. Patients underwent stem cell mobilization followed by Melphalan 200 mg/m2 and ASCT with a minimum of 2 × 106 CD34 cells/kg for stem cell infusion. Responding patients with SD or better were randomized at day 100 to 110 post ASCT to study drug versus placebo. Patients with progressive disease were not randomized. Randomized patients were stratified by elevated β2 microglobulin at diagnosis and prior thalidomide or lenalidomide use during induction therapy. The starting dose was 10 mg daily with an escalation at 3 months to 15 mg if tolerated. Study drug could be de-escalated by 5 mg daily if not tolerated. Patients could be maintained at 5, 10 or 15 mg as tolerated and were followed with monthly complete blood counts. Drug was held for neutropenia (Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500/μl or thrombocytopenia (<30,000/ μl) and restarted after resolution of cytopenia(s). Patients were re-staged by blood and urine testing every 3 months, by skeletal survey and bone marrow testing yearly and remained on maintenance therapy until progression. A total of 568 pts were registered at centers from the following cooperative groups: CALGB (n=377), ECOG (n=132), and BMT-CTN (n=59). The study opened in 12/2004 with increasing annual accrual: 2005, n=33, (6%); 2006, n=62, (11%); 2007, n=137, (24%); 2008, n=214, (38%); 2009, n=122, (21%) and study closure on 07/03/09. The drop out rate before randomization at day 100 to 110 was projected to be 10-15% with an expected randomization of 462 patients. Among the 568 registered patients, 424 have been randomized, 81 have dropped out pre-randomization and 63 are pending randomization as of 08/06/09. Projected final randomization is approximately 475. Pooled Hematologic and Non-Hematologic Adverse Events (AEs) are available from 275 patients in both arms. Individual patients experiencing Hematologic AEs are as follows: Grade 3 (severe) n=43 (16%); Grade 4 (life-threatening) n=26 (9%); and no Grade 5 (lethal). Individual patients experiencing Non-Hematologic AEs are as follows: Grade 3 n=74 (27%); Grade 4 n=9 (3%); Grade 5 n=5 (2%). The most common Non-Hematologic AEs were infection, fever, rash and fatigue. The Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) will continue to monitor the study for AEs and determination of progression. This large Phase III study has successfully completed patient registration and is nearing completion of patient randomization at day 100 to 110 post ASCT through the cooperation of the Intergroup oncology and transplant clinical research groups. Further analysis will determine if maintenance therapy with lenalidomide (CC-5013) is of benefit for MM patients following single ASCT. Disclosures McCarthy: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide for maintenance therapy following autotransplant for multiple myeloma. Stadtmauer:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Richardson:Millenium (Research Funding and Advisory Board), Celgene, Keryx, BMS, Merck, Johnson and Johnson (All Advisory Board): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Anderson:Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatinum (GemOx): An Effective Regimen in Patients with Refractory and Relapsing Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4845-4845
Author(s):  
Antonio Gutierrez ◽  
Jose Rodriguez ◽  
Andres Lopez ◽  
Jordi Martinez-serra ◽  
Jorge Gines ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4845 Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) represents 10–15% of all types of lymphoma. At present, more than 70% of patients can be cured with current strategies based on chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. However, one third of the cases finally relapses and needs salvage regimens usually consolidated with high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. The number of regimens and drugs available are limited and new protocols that increase the efficacy with manageable toxicity are needed. In the present communication we report the results of a retrospective study using the GemOx schema that combines the efficacy of gemcitabine in Hodgkin lymphoma with oxaliplatin, a less toxic and effective platinum-based drug. Patients and methods: Patients were eligible for this retrospective study, according to the following criteria: diagnosis of HL, which relapsed or failed to achieve complete remission after induction treatment. They received GemOx regimen that consisted of gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100mg/m2 on day 1. Treatment was given every 15 days if feasible or every 21 days. To evaluate response and toxicity Cheson criteria and OMS toxicity scale were used respectively. Results: Between 2003 and 2012, 29 patients with Hodgkin lymphoma were retrospectively included in this study. All patients had recurrent (n=17) or refractory (n=12) disease. Median age was 24 (14–76) years and 50% had an International Prognosis Score (IPS) higher than 2. Patients received a mean of 2.79 previous regimens and 79% more than 1 regimen before GemOx with 48% relapsing after a prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Median follow-up was 41 months. 76% of patients responded (31% complete responses; CR). Responses were better in the relapsed setting or partial response (PR) (85% with a 45% of CR) compared to the truly refractory cases (55% PR) (p=0.037). Main prognostic factors for HL were assessed to view their impact on survival. Factors related with progression- free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were age lower than 45 years, response to GemOx and consolidation with stem cell transplantation (p=0.001). Presence of B-symptoms at diagnosis also influenced OS. Neurologic toxicity was present in 9% of patients, all of them grade I or II. Hematologic toxicity was also common, including grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 23% of patients, and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in 33%. Nausea and vomiting occurred in all the patients at grade 2, or lower. At last follow-up, 13 patients (45%) are alive and remain free of progression. However, 16 patients (54%) had died: 12 (41%) due to progression of disease, 3 (10%) due to complications due to a subsequent allogenic transplant (graft versus host disease, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and bleeding) and 1 due to pneumonia. PFS was better in patients consolidated with autologous or allogeneic transplantation (100%) compared with patients not consolidated (14%) (p=0.009). PBSC collection after GemOx and G-CSF was successful for all of candidates. Conclusions: 1) GemOx regimen is effective in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma with manageable toxicity; 2) Results are better in relapsed or chemosensitive disease compared to truly refractory cases; 3) No mobilization failures were observed; 4) Consolidation after response is needed. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Final analysis of the phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of single dose velafermin (CG53135–05) for the prevention of oral mucositis

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6537-6537 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. W. Schuster ◽  
E. Anaissie ◽  
D. Hurd ◽  
W. Bensinger ◽  
J. Mason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Single Dose ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Oral Mucositis ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Grade 3

6537 Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is a commonly occurring side effect of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in patients (pts) undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). Velafermin, recombinant human fibroblast growth factor 20, is being investigated for prevention of OM. Velafermin promotes epithelial and mesenchymal cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Methods: A phase II trial was conducted to evaluate safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of velafermin. Inclusion criteria: pts undergoing HDCT and AHSCT with or without total body irradiation (TBI) were enrolled. Velafermin at 0.03, 0.1, or 0.2 mg/kg or placebo was administered as single dose IV at 24h after stem cell infusion. Safety and PK were assessed. Pts were scored daily for presence of OM using the WHO grading scale. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Grade 3/4 OM. Results: A total of 212 pts were randomized to either placebo (n=51) or velafermin at 0.03 (n=50), 0.1 (n=56), or 0.2 (n=55) mg/kg (intent-to-treat or ITT sample). 206 pts (97%) received study drug or placebo. Pt diagnoses included multiple myeloma (57%), non-Hodgkin’s (25%), or Hodgkin’s (11%) lymphoma and 13 pts (6%) received TBI as part of the conditioning regimen. The Grade 3/4 OM incidence rates (%) in the placebo or velafermin arms (0.03, 0.1, and 0.2 mg/kg) were 37, 18, 38, and 36, respectively. The primary analysis of dose dependent reduction of severe OM was not statistically significant (p = 0.549). However, velafermin at 0.03 mg/kg did reduce the incidence of Grade 3/4 OM when compared to placebo alone (p = 0.031). Duration of Grade 3/4 OM was reduced significantly in the 0.03 mg/kg when every pt was evaluated or in the 0.1 mg/kg dose when only pts with Grade 3/4 OM were included in the analysis (p = 0.037 and 0.014, respectively). A total of 5 related SAEs (3 in 0.1 mg/kg, 1 in 0.03 mg/kg, and 1 in placebo cohort) occurred within 4hr of study drug infusion. All symptoms were transient. Conclusion: Single dose velafermin at 0.03mg/kg is may be active in reducing CT induced severe OM in AHSCT pts. Safety profile supports continuing study to define the optimal dose for prevention of severe OM. A new Phase II study will be conducted to confirm velafermin activity at 0.03mg/kg dose. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document