Bisphosphonates and Osteonecrosis of the Jaws: Incidence in a Homogeneous Series of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Treated with Zoledronic Acid.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3461-3461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia Tosi ◽  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
Delia Cangini ◽  
Paola Tacchetti ◽  
Massimo Offidani ◽  
...  

Abstract Osteonecrosis of the jaws (ONJ) is a rare complication that has been described as osteoradionecrosis in patients who had previously undergone radiotherapy for head and neck cancer or similar disorders. It has been recently reported that the incidence of ONJ has significantly increased since the wide application of bisphosphonates as specific therapy of cancer related bone disease. No consensus on diagnostic criteria does presently exist, the pathogenesis of this complication is unknown and the relative contribution of repeated trauma from dental procedures, poor oral hygiene, concomitant chemotherapy, and cancer bone involvement has not been clarified yet. All the same, no data have so far been presented concerning the incidence of ONJ in a homogeneous series of patients with respect to disease status and treatment received. For this purpose, we have retrospectively evaluated the occurrence of ONJ in patients with symptomatic newly diagnosed multiple myeloma enrolled in the “Bologna 2002” clinical trial. According to treatment protocol, all patients received four months of combined thalidomide (100mg/d for two weeks and 200mg/d thereafter) and dexamethasone (40mg/d on d 1–4, 9–12, 17–20/28d on odd cycles and on d 1–4 on even cycles) followed by cyclophosphamide 7g/m2 + G-CSF and PBSC collection, and two courses of Melphalan 200mg/mq and PBSC transplantation. Zoledronic acid was administered at 4mg/28 d throughout the whole study period and afterwards until disease progression. Out of 225 patients analyzed so far (median follow-up = 26 months), ONJ was diagnosed in 6 cases (2.7%), median time from start of treatment and occurrence of dental symptoms was 23 months (range 13–32 months). All the patients underwent dental extraction and/or oral/maxillofacial surgery that resulted in areas of non-healing bone with persistent purulent discharge. Bone biopsies confirmed bone necrosis and inflammation; in 1 case, however, a concomitant infiltration of monoclonal plasma cells was detected in the site of necrosis. In conclusion, results of this retrospective analysis indicate that the occurrence of ONJ among newly diagnosed MM patients receiving long-term (median: 2 years) zoledronic acid treatment was approximately 3%. Surgery can significantly impact patients outcome, so that, according to currently available recommendations on ONJ, dental procedures should be avoided. In addition, the role played by disease itself in the pathogenesis of this complication should not be overlooked.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (12) ◽  
pp. 3951-3952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia Tosi ◽  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
Delia Cangini ◽  
Paola Tacchetti ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 145
Author(s):  
Diana Florina Nica ◽  
Mircea Riviș ◽  
Ciprian Ioan Roi ◽  
Carmen Darinca Todea ◽  
Virgil-Florin Duma ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: Antiresorptive or anti-angiogenic agents may induce medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ), which represents a challenge for clinicians. The aim of this study is to design and apply a composed and stage-approach therapy combining antibiotherapy, surgical treatment, and photo-biomodulation (PBM) for the prevention or treatment of MRONJ lesions. Materials and Methods: The proposed treatment protocol was carried out in the Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery of the “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Farmacy of Timisoara, in 2018–2020. A total of 241 patients who were previously exposed to antiresorptive or anti-angiogenic therapy, as well as patients already diagnosed with MRONJ at different stages of the disease were treated. A preventive protocol was applied for patients in an “at risk” stage. Patients in more advanced stages received a complex treatment. Results: The healing proved to be complete, with spontaneous bone coverage in all the n = 84 cases placed in an “at risk” stage. For the n = 49 patients belonging to stage 0, pain reductions and decreases of mucosal inflammations were also obtained in all cases. For the n = 108 patients proposed for surgery (i.e., in stages 1, 2, or 3 of MRONJ), a total healing rate of 91.66% was obtained after the first surgery, while considering the downscaling to stage 1 as a treatment “success”, only one “failure” was reported. This brings the overall “success” rate to 96.68% for a complete healing, and to 99.59% when downscaling to stage 1 is included in the healing rate. Conclusions: Therefore, the clinical outcome of the present study indicates that patients with MRONJ in almost all stages of the disease can benefit from such a proposed association of methods, with superior clinical results compared to classical therapies.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1970-1970
Author(s):  
Attaya Suvannasankha ◽  
Sherif Farag ◽  
Robin Obryant ◽  
Lisa l Wood ◽  
Nicole Porter ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1970 Background: An effective and convenient regimen is appealing for Multiple Myeloma (MM) therapy. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone combination is highly effective in MM. However, at the FDA approved dose, dexamethasone related toxicity remains challenging. We report the efficacy and side effect profile of an all oral, dexamethasone-sparing combination of lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and prednisone in newly diagnosed MM. Methods: The treatment protocol consisted of lenalidomide (Revlimid®) given orally at a dose of 25 mg daily on days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle, cyclophosphamide at a dose of 50 mg b.i.d. days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle, and prednisone 50 mg q.o.d (RCP). Responses were assessed on intent-to-treat basis based on the International Uniform Response Criteria. Treatment was planned for 6 cycles. Responding patients proceeded to observation, or transplantation, based on patient's preferred choices. All patients received, unless contraindicated, aspirin prophylaxis (81 or 325 mg daily) for prevention of deep-vein thrombosis, acyclovir for herpes zoster prevention, and bisphosphonates. Results: Forty six patients were enrolled from October 2007 to August 2010. Median follow up duration was 5.6 months. At this time, 38 of 46 patients are evaluable for confirmed responses (i.e., off-study or completed at least 4 cycles of therapy). The median age was 63 years (range, 41–76). 16 patients had ISS stage II (42%) and 8 (21%) had stage III disease. The median number of cycles was 6 (range: 1 – 6). Among the 38 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 95%, consisting of CR: 1 (3%), VGPR: 9 (24%) and PR: 26 (68%). One patient had stable disease (1%) after the first cycle and treatment is ongoing. One patient had progression (3%). Thirty twoof 38 patients have discontinued study treatment. Reasons for treatment discontinuation are: completed study per protocol (24), disease progression (3), adverse event (2), non compliance (1), alternate treatment (1) and withdrawal of consent unrelated to toxicity (1). The most common toxicity was sensory neuropathy (24%): 8 (21%) grade I and 1 (3%) grade II. Other common toxicity included constipation (21%), pruritus (21%) and edema of limbs (18%). The most common hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (18%); 4 grade III and 2 grade IV. Infections were seen in 4 patients (2 febrile neutropenia and 2 with normal ANC). Five patients had grade 4 metabolic abnormalities (2 renal failure attributed to dehydration and tumor lysis, 2 hyperglycemia. and 1 hypokalemia). Thirteen patients had dose adjustments or interruption, most commonly due to hematological toxicity attributed to lenalidomide or cyclophosphamide. Twenty-five patients had stem cell collection. In all, sufficient numbers of stem cells (CD34+ cells ≥ 4.0 × 106 cells/kg) were collected for the transplantation use. To date, fifteen have undergone high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Of eight patients with PR on RCP, seven achieved VGPR and one achieved CR post transplant. Of four patients with VGPR on RCP, 2 achieved CR and 2 remained in VGPR post transplant. Post-transplant response is not yet evaluable in the 3 remaining patients. Conclusions: The combination of lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (RCP) has excellent activity in the setting of newly diagnosed myeloma. Overall toxicities were manageable. The study is still ongoing with the total accrual goal of up to 48 patients. The updated data for response and toxicities will be presented at the ASH Annual Meeting. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18506-18506
Author(s):  
G. Teoh ◽  
D. Tan ◽  
C. Chuah ◽  
W. Hwang ◽  
R. Yiu ◽  
...  

18506 Background: Although dexamethasone (Dex), thalidomide (Thal) and zoledronic acid (Zol) have frequently been combined for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), the ideal dosing schedule is unknown. We previously reported that lower doses of Dex and Thal can be effectively combined with high-frequency dosing of Zol (Haematologica 2005). Methods: This “dtZ” regimen - which comprises weekly Dex 20 mg OM for 4 days, Thal 50 mg ON, and 3-weekly Zol 4 mg - resulted in an impressive response rate (RR) of 61.6% and near complete remission (nCR)/complete remission (CR) rate of 7.7% in 26 patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Results: In this present study, we treated 22 newly diagnosed MM patients with “dtZ” and report an even more impressive RR of 100.0% and nCR/CR rate of 20–35%. The median time to response was 1.8 months and median time to maximum response was 2.2 months. The median time to progression (TTP) has not been achieved yet. As expected, low-dose Dex/Thal resulted in lower (18.1%) grade 3 or 4 toxicities. These were all infections; which lead to further dose-reduction of Dex. There were no thromboembolic events, despite the fact that aspirin was not routinely given. Of particular interest, 3- weekly Zol was not associated with any significant decrease in renal function, and none of our patients developed osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). In fact, at the time of writing of this abstract, more than 1,000 doses of Zol had been administered in a 3-weekly fashion to these as well as other patients, and only 1 patient developed ONJ. This patient who had already received greater than 20 doses of Zol healed uneventfully after receiving appropriate outpatient dental treatment, and subsequently received another 8 doses of Zol with no recurrence of ONJ. Conclusion: In conclusion, the Zol-based “dtZ” regimen is potentially a highly-effective and safe frontline regimen for MM. Using Zol every 3 weeks with lower doses of Dex and Thal does not appear to increase the rate or severity of nephrotoxicity or ONJ. Although we do not know exactly why every patient responded to “dtZ”, we speculate that this could be due to a critical balance that has been achieved between the anti-MM, anti-osteoclastic and immunostimulatory effects of the individual drugs of the combination. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3251-3251
Author(s):  
Chang-Ki Min ◽  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Wee Joo Chng ◽  
Shang-Yi Huang ◽  
Cheng-Shyong Chang ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) that has been shown to reduce skeletal-related events (SREs) associated with bone lesions in patients with multiple myeloma. Results from the full primary analysis of an international, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled phase 3 (20090482) study that assessed the efficacy and safety of denosumab vs zoledronic acid for preventing SREs in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) indicated that denosumab was non-inferior to zoledronic acid for time to SREs. Here we present a sub-analysis to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes in a subgroup of Asian patients enrolled in the 20090482 study. Methods: Adult patients from Asian countries with newly diagnosed MM and ≥1 documented lytic bone lesion were included in this analysis. Patients received subcutaneous denosumab (120 mg) plus intravenous placebo or intravenous zoledronic acid (4 mg) plus subcutaneous placebo in 4-week cycles. The primary endpoint was time to first on-study SRE; the incidence of adverse events (AEs) by preferred term was also examined. Results: Overall, 196 Asian patients (denosumab, n=103; zoledronic acid, n=93) were included in this analysis. Patient demographics were generally well balanced between groups. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) number of months on study was 17.5 (9.8-30.2) for the denosumab group and 20.2 (13.1-29.2) for the zoledronic acid group. Median (IQR) cumulative drug exposure was 15.9 (8.5-24.0) months for denosumab and 17.4 (9.1-26.7) months for zoledronic acid. Fewer patients in the denosumab group developed first on-study SRE compared with the zoledronic acid group; the crude incidence of SREs at the primary analysis cutoff was 38.8% in the denosumab group and 50.5% in the zoledronic acid group. Median (95% CI) time in months to first on-study SRE was not reached (11.2-not reached) for the denosumab group and 12.3 (3.1-not reached) for the zoledronic acid group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.48-1.26; Figure 1). Overall, all patients (100%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent AE; the AEs reported in ≥20% of patients in either treatment arm are presented in Table 1. The most common AEs reported in either subgroup (denosumab, zoledronic acid) were diarrhea (51.0%, 51.1%), nausea (42.2%, 46.7%), pyrexia (38.2%, 41.3%), upper respiratory tract infection (37.3%, 40.2%), and constipation (33.3%, 31.5%). Renal toxicity (preferred terms of blood creatinine increased, renal failure, urine output decreased, acute kidney injury, renal impairment, and blood urea decreased) occurred in 9 of 102 (8.8%) patients in the denosumab group and 20 of 92 (21.7%) patients in the zoledronic acid group. Adjudicated osteonecrosis of the jaw was reported in 7 (6.9%) patients in the denosumab group and 5 (5.4%) patients in the zoledronic acid group. Hypocalcemia was reported in 19 (18.6%) patients in the denosumab group and 17 (18.5%) patients in the zoledronic acid group. Conclusion: Results from this Asian subgroup analysis were comparable to those of the full analysis set. In addition, in this analysis there were numerically fewer patients in the denosumab arm that developed a first on-study SRE compared with those in the zoledronic acid arm, and the time to first on-study SRE had a trend favoring the denosumab-treated patients. The AE profiles for denosumab and zoledronic acid in the Asian subgroup were comparable to those observed in the full primary analysis, with renal toxicity similarly reported to be higher in the zoledronic acid group. Overall, this analysis supports that denosumab may be an additional treatment option for the standard of care for Asian patients with newly diagnosed MM with bone disease. Disclosures Chng: Merck: Research Funding; Aslan: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses. Chang:BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novarits: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Wong:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Archigen: Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Apellis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Boehringer: Research Funding; Ingelheim: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy; Astellas: Speakers Bureau. Shimizu:Amgen Inc.: Other: Non-remunerative Position of Influence, Denosumab 20090482 Global Steering Committee Member; Fujimoto Pharmacuetical Corp: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo, Co., Ltd: Consultancy. Gao:Amgen Asia Holding Limited: Employment, Equity Ownership. Glennane:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guan:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document