Phase III Trial of Pixantrone Dimaleate Compared with Other Agents as Third-Line, Single-Agent Treatment of Relapsed Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (EXTEND): Results From the Treatment and Follow-up Periods.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1677-1677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Pettengell ◽  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Geetha Narayanan ◽  
Fernando Hurtado de Mendoza ◽  
Raghunadharao Digumarti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Comparator Group ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

Abstract Abstract 1677 Poster Board I-703 Introduction Nearly half of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) relapse or are refractory to initial therapy. With each subsequent therapy, the probability of response decreases and the responses are less durable. An agent currently in development, pixantrone dimaleate (pixantrone), is a novel aza-anthracenedione structurally similar to mitoxantrone and anthracyclines. The clinical activity and safety profile of pixantrone are promising in patients heavily pretreated for relapsed aggressive NHL and who received prior treatment with up to 450 mg/m2 of doxorubicin. Patients and Methods This phase 3, randomized, multicenter, controlled, open-label study enrolled patients who had ≥1 prior anthracycline-containing regimen and failed 2 prior treatment regimens for relapsed aggressive (de novo or transformed) NHL. Seventy patients were randomized to a treatment group administered pixantrone 85 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, for up to 6 cycles. Seventy patients were randomized to the investigator's choice of a single-agent comparator (vinorelbine, oxaliplatin, ifosfamide, etoposide, or mitoxantrone; in the US only, gemcitabine and rituximab were permitted). Patients in both groups were followed up to 18 months after last treatment. The primary endpoint, CR/CRu rate, was assessed by an independent assessment panel (IAP). Other efficacy endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), responses lasting ≥4 months, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response, and time to response. This report includes the results from the treatment period and updated results from the follow-up period, which is still ongoing. Results A total of 140 patients were randomized with 70 patients in each treatment group. Of the 140 patients, 96% received treatment (n=68 for pixantrone, n=67 for comparator). The median number of treatment cycles that patients in the pixantrone group received was 4 compared with 3 for the comparator group. The percentage of patients who received all 6 treatment cycles in the pixantrone group was 32.4% compared with 28.4% for the comparator. The primary endpoint, CR/CRu rate (assessed by IAP), in the ITT population was 20.0% for the pixantrone group compared with 5.7% for the comparator (P = 0.021). The ORR for the pixantrone group was 37.1% compared with 14.3% for the comparator (P = 0.003), and the percentage of patients with objective responses lasting at least 4 months for the pixantrone group was 25.7% compared with 8.6% for the comparator (P =0.012). The median number of months of PFS in the pixantrone group was 4.7 compared with 2.6 for the comparator (HR= 0.60, log rank P = 0.007). The median number of months of OS, while not fully mature, was 8.1 for the pixantrone group compared with 6.9 for the comparator (HR=0.88, log rank P = 0.554). Subgroup assessments of the CR/CRu rate and ORR, by risk factor, were consistently higher in the pixantrone group than in the comparator group. These subgroup assessments included prior exposure to anthracyclines ('300 mg/m2 or ≥300 mg/ m2) and rituximab (treated or not treated), IPI score ('1 or ≥2), and NHL diagnosis (refractory or relapsed), and age ('65 or ≥65). In the pixantrone group, neutropenia and leukopenia were the most common (≥10%) grade 3/4 adverse events and the incidence of febrile neutropenia was 7.4%. The percentage of patients with cardiac disorder SAEs was 8.8% in the pixantrone group compared with 4.5% for the comparator. Conclusions In this phase 3, randomized, multicenter study, patients with relapsed aggressive NHL administered single-agent pixantrone achieved superior efficacy, compared with other single-agent chemotherapeutic agents, as measured by CR/CRu rate, ORR, responses lasting ≥4 months, and PFS. Positive trends were observed in OS and duration of response. Patients in the pixantrone group tended to reach CR sooner than patients in the comparator group. Pixantrone has a tolerable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed aggressive NHL. Disclosures Cernohous: Cell Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Wang:Cell Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Singer:Cell Therapeutics, Inc: Employment.

DREAMM-2: Single-agent belantamab mafodotin (GSK2857916) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and high-risk (HR) cytogenetics.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8541-8541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam D. Cohen ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Edward N. Libby ◽  
Hans Chulhee Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Blurred Vision ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Independent Review ◽  
Clinical Responses ◽  
Number Of Cycles

8541 Background: Patients with RRMM and HR cytogenetics have a poor prognosis and need effective therapies. In DREAMM-2 (NCT03525678), single-agent belantamab mafodotin (an immunoconjugate targeting B-cell maturation antigen) demonstrated clinically meaningful activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM ( Lancet Oncol.2020). We present outcomes in patients with HR-cytogenetics (9-month follow-up). Methods: Patients with RRMM received single-agent belantamab mafodotin (2.5 or 3.4 mg/kg). For this post hoc analysis, HR-cytogenetics included t(4;14), t(14;16), 17p13del, or 1q21+ (tested locally). Results: The median number of cycles was 3 (2.5: range: 1–15) and 4 (3.4: range: 1–14). Overall response rate (ORR; ≥partial response [PR] per independent review committee) was 27% in the 2.5 mg/kg group (22% with ≥very good partial response [VGPR]) and 40% in the 3.4 mg/kg group (27% with ≥VGPR). The median duration of response (DoR) was not reached in the 2.5 mg/kg group and was 6.2 months in the 3.4 mg/kg group. The most common adverse events ( > 30% in either group) were consistent with the overall population ( Lancet Oncol.2020): keratopathy (2.5: 59%;3.4: 79%), thrombocytopenia (2.5: 44%; 3.4: 65%), nausea (2.5: 27%; 3.4: 33%), anemia (2.5: 24%; 3.4: 42%), and blurred vision (2.5: 20%; 3.4: 42%). Conclusions: Patients with HR-cytogenetics maintain deep and durable clinical responses with single-agent belantamab mafodotin, comparable to that reported in the overall population. The safety profile remained consistent with previous reports. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline (205678). Drug linker technology licensed from Seattle Genetics; monoclonal antibody produced using POTELLIGENT Technology licensed from BioWa. Clinical trial information: NCT03525678 . [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of irinotecan plus bevacizumab for heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5016-5016
Author(s):  
Salvia Sanjay Jain ◽  
Yan G. Makeyev ◽  
Franco Muggia ◽  
James L. Speyer ◽  
John Patrick Curtin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Protocol Amendment ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

5016 Background: Irinotecan and bevacizumab have single agent activity in platinum sensitive (PSen) and resistant (PRes) ovarian cancer patients (pts). We sought to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of irinotecan plus bevacizumab in these pts. The trial was designed to evaluate whether the progression free survival (PFS) at 6 months is at least 40% and with secondary objectives of estimating response rate (RR), duration of response (DoR), time to progression and toxicity. Methods: No limitation on number of prior regimens was placed, and prior use of study drugs was allowed. Irinotecan 250mg/m2 and bevacizumab 15mg/kg every 3 weeks were given. Due to treatment-related grade 3 toxicity (diarrhea and neutropenia) experienced by the first 5 pts on the study, the dose of irinotecan was amended to 175mg/m2. Results: 20 pts with recurrent ovarian cancer [PSen 5, PRes 15] of a planned 35 have been recruited thus far. Median age is 59 (45-78). Median number of prior regimens is 5 (3-12) with 9 pts demonstrating progressive disease (PD) on prior topotecan-containing regimens and 7 pts exhibiting PD on prior bevacizumab-containing regimens. 4 pts discontinued treatment before 2 cycles (2 for protocol defined toxicity, 2 by patient/physician choice). Partial response (PR) was observed in 2 PSen pts and 1 PRes pt, while stable disease (SD)was seen in 9 (2 PSen, 7 PRes) out of the 15 pts assessable for response at this time. 3 pts demonstrated PD after 2 cycles of treatment. 12 of 13 pts with PR or SD by RECIST also had response by CA125 criteria. Median DoR thus far (SD plus PR) is 18 weeks (4-37). 6 pts have ongoing response (4-18 weeks). Of 19 pts that received > 2 cycles, 3 had grade 3 diarrhea (2 before protocol amendment and 1 after). 2 pts had grade 3/4 neutropenia (1 before and 1 after protocol amendment). Median PFS is 9.6 months (mts). Median overall survival is 15.5 mts. PFS rate at 6 mts is 61% with 95% confidence interval: (40%, 92%). Conclusions: Results of the trial to date suggest the hypothesis that the PFS at 6 mts is less than 40% can be rejected. Activity of this regimen is encouraging given the heavily pretreated nature of the pts. Dose-limiting diarrhea and neutropenia required protocol amendment. We continue to accrue study subjects at the amended dosing.

Interim analysis results of surufatinib in U.S. patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4114-4114
Author(s):  
Andrew Scott Paulson ◽  
Daneng Li ◽  
Max W. Sung ◽  
Christopher Tucci ◽  
John S. Kauh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

4114 Background: Surufatinib (S) is a targeted inhibitor of tyrosine kinases VEGFR1, 2, and 3; FGFR1; and CSF-1R. A manageable safety profile and statistically significant efficacy of S have previously been demonstrated in patients (pts) with advanced NETs of extrapancreatic (epNET) and pancreatic (pNET) origin in 2 phase 3 randomized trials conducted in China (SANET-ep, NCT02588170; SANET-p, NCT02589821). Pts with epNETs achieved a median progression free survival (PFS) of 9.2 v 3.8 months (mo) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.334; p < 0.0001), and pts with pNETs achieved a median PFS of 10.9 v 3.7 mo (HR 0.491; p = 0.0011), with S v placebo, respectively. S has recently been approved for the treatment (tx) of pts with epNETs in China. Methods: A phase 1, dose escalation (ESC)/expansion (EXP) trial was conducted to evaluate and confirm the efficacy and safety of S in US pts. ESC was completed, and the maximum tolerated dose and recommend phase 2 dose were determined to be 300 mg, same as previous trials. The EXP completed enrollment of the epNET and pNET cohorts, and the primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS rate at 11 mo. Secondary objectives included assessment of safety and PK. Results: 32 pts with heavily pretreated progressive NETs (16 epNET and pNET each) were enrolled in the dose EXP. The median age was 62.2 years (44-75) and 64.4 years (39-72) for epNET and pNET pts, respectively. 65.6% of pts received ≥3 prior lines of tx (median lines of therapy: epNET: 2 [2-5]; pNET: 4 [1-8]), and all pts previously received everolimus and/or sunitinib. As of the data cutoff of 30-Jun-20, 7 pts remained on tx (4 epNET; 3 pNET). The median number of tx cycles was 8.0 (2, 15) for epNET and 8.5 (2, 23) for pNET pts. The PFS rate at 11 mo was 51.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.8, 80.3) for pts with epNETs and 57.4% (95% CI: 28.7, 78.2) for pts with pNETs. The observed mPFS was 11.50 mo (95% CI: 6.47, 11.50) and 15.18 mo (95% CI: 5.19, NR) for pts with epNETs and pNETs, respectively. An objective response rate (ORR) of 6.3% was observed for pts with epNETs and 18.8% for pts with pNETs. A disease control rate of 90.6% (95% CI: 75.0, 98.0) was observed for all NET pts (93.8% epNET; 87.5% pNET). The safety profile of S remains consistent with previously completed trials. All pts (n = 32) had reported at least 1 adverse event (AE), and 24 pts (75%) reported AEs ≥grade 3. The most common AEs of any grade reported were fatigue (46.9%), hypertension (43.8%), proteinuria (37.5%), diarrhea (34.4%), vomiting (28.1%), and nausea (25.0%). The most commonly reported AEs ≥grade 3 ( > 5%) were hypertension (37.5%); diarrhea (9.4%); and proteinuria, dysphagia, and anemia (6.3% each). AEs leading to tx discontinuation occurred in 21.9% of pts. Conclusions: S has demonstrated antitumor activity in heavily pretreated US pts with progressive NETs with a manageable safety profile that is consistent with 2 completed phase 3 studies. S continues to be studied in other ongoing clinical trials globally. Clinical trial information: NCT02549937.

Nivolumab/pembrolizumab in Child-Pugh grade B/C patients with advanced HCC.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16184-e16184
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Sum Lung Wong ◽  
Gin Wai Kwok ◽  
Vikki Tang ◽  
Bryan Li ◽  
Roland Ching-Yu Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Refractory Ascites ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade ◽  
Systemic Therapies

e16184 Background: Hepatic derangement commonly accompanies advanced HCC (aHCC) and limits the use of systemic therapies. We aimed to evaluate the use of single agent anti-PD-1 nivolumab or pembrolizumab in Child-Pugh (CP) grade B or C patients with aHCC. Methods: Consecutive aHCC patients with CP grade B (CPB) or C (CPC) liver function who received single agent nivolumab or pembrolizumab were analysed. Objective response rate (ORR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed. Results: Between May 2015 and June 2020, 61 patients were included. The median age was 60 (range 28-82). 81% and 4.8% had hepatitis-B and hepatitis-C related HCCs respectively. 72.1% (n = 44) were of CPB and 27.9% (n = 17) were of CPC. Amongst CPB patients, 19 (31.1% of all patients) had CP score 7 (CP7) and 25 (41.0% of all patients) had CP score 8 or 9. The median follow-up was 2.3 months. The ORR of CPB and CPC patients were 6.8% and 0% respectively (p = 0.553). The TTP of CPB and CPC patients were 2.1 months (95% C.I. 1.4-2.8) and 1.4 months (95% C.I. 0.6-2.1) respectively (p = 0.204). CPB patients had significantly better OS than CPC patients (3.1 months (95% C.I. 1.4-4.7), vs. 1.7 months (95% C.I. 1.0-2.4), p = 0.041). Compared to CP score ≥8 (CP≥8) patients, CP7 patients had significantly better OS (median OS CP7 6.7 months (95% C.I. 4.0-9.3), vs. CP≥8 1.8 months (1.2-2.4), p = 0.002). Patients with diuretic-refractory ascites had significantly worse OS compared to those without (1.7 months (95% C.I. 1.0-2.5) vs. 3.7 months (95% C.I. 0.1-7.3), p = 0.004). Portal vein (PV) thrombosis was also significantly associated with inferior survival, with median OS of patients with any PV thrombosis being 1.8 months (95% C.I. 1.0-2.5), compared to 5.3 months (95% C.I. 2.4-8.1) of those without (p = 0.004). The median number of doses given was 3 (range 1-34). Median treatment duration was 5.0 weeks (range 0-77). Overall, 25.4% of patients experienced TRAEs and 4.8% experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were skin-related (13.1%) and constitutional symptoms (6.6%). Conclusions: Nivolumab/pembrolizumab had acceptable safety in CPB/C patients with aHCC. CP7, absence of diuretic-refractory ascites and lack of PV thrombosis were associated with better survival.

Inducible T-cell co-stimulatory (ICOS) receptor agonist, feladilimab (fela), alone and in combination (combo) with pembrolizumab (P): Results from INDUCE-1 urothelial carcinoma (UC) expansion cohorts (ECs).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4519-4519
Author(s):  
Arjun Vasant Balar ◽  
Victor Moreno ◽  
Eric Angevin ◽  
Hui Kong Gan ◽  
Maria Vieito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

4519 Background: INDUCE-1 is a first-in-human trial evaluating fela, an IgG4 ICOS agonist non-T-cell depleting mAb, as monotherapy (mono) and in combo with P. ECs include tumor types, such as UC, with high ICOS expression and immunotherapy-favorable features. Fela induced IFNγ, increased PD-1/L1 expression, and enhanced antitumor activity in combo with PD-1 blockade nonclinically. We report preliminary efficacy, safety, and biomarker data of fela ± P in INDUCE-1 UC ECs. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had recurrent/metastatic (R/M) UC of the upper or lower urinary tract, ≤6 prior systemic therapy lines in the advanced setting, measurable disease, and no active autoimmune disease. Pts received 0.3 or 1 mg/kg fela (mono EC; anti-PD-1/L1–experienced [exp] pts) or 0.3 mg/kg fela + 200 mg P (combo EC; anti-PD-1/L1–naïve pts) every 3 wks, up to 35 cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Disease was assessed every 9 wks through wk 54, then every 12 wks. Archival and/or fresh biopsy tumor tissue was collected for biomarker analyses and safety assessed. Results: By Nov 6 2020, 13 anti-PD-1/L1–exp and 32 anti-PD-1/L1–naïve pts were evaluable in the mono and combo ECs, respectively. In the mono EC, median age was 69 yrs (range: 47–82), 92% of pts were male, and 85% received ≥2 prior therapy lines in the metastatic setting. In the combo EC, median age was 70 yrs (range: 42–84), 75% of pts were male, and 72% received ≥1 prior therapy line in the metastatic setting. In the mono EC, median duration of follow-up (mDoF) was 10.6 mo (range: 1.1–22.8); overall response rate (ORR) was 8% (1 partial response [PR]; 95% CI: 0.2, 36.0) with a duration of response (DoR) of 6.1 mo; disease control rate (DCR [response or stable disease for ≥9 wks]) was 23% (95% CI: 5.0, 53.8), and median overall survival (mOS) was 14.5 mo (95% CI: 2.8, NR), with 74% of pts alive at 6 mo. In the combo EC, mDoF was 9.6 mo (range: 0.9–28.3); ORR was 22% (7 PRs; 95% CI: 9.3, 40.0) with a median DoR of 8.3 months (range: 3.5–23.3+); DCR was 63% (95% CI: 43.7, 78.9), and mOS was 10.7 mo (95% CI: 5.2, 18.1), with 64% of pts alive at 6 mo. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were reported for 0% and 9% of pts in the mono (N = 16) and combo (N = 44) safety populations, respectively. PD-L1 expression and ICOS-specific biomarkers are being evaluated, with promising trends observed in enrichment of clinical activity in preliminary analyses. Conclusions: Fela is the first ICOS agonist with reported single-agent activity in anti-PD-1/L1–exp relapsed/refractory UC. Fela + P in combo shows promising clinical activity and manageable safety in PD-1/L1–naïve R/M UC. Further study is warranted. Updated data to be presented. Funding: Study 204691 (NCT02723955) funded by GlaxoSmithKline in collaboration with Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Clinical trial information: NCT02723955.

Phase 1/2 study of cirmtuzumab and ibrutinib in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7556-7556
Author(s):  
Hun Ju Lee ◽  
Michael Y. Choi ◽  
Tanya Siddiqi ◽  
Jacqueline Claudia Barrientos ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Car T ◽  
Treatment Naïve

7556 Background: Cirmtuzumab (Cirm) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the tumor promoting activity of ROR1 and had demonstrated additive/synergistic activity with many anti-cancer agents including ibrutinib (Ibr). Methods: Patients (Pts) with relapsed or refractory (RR) MCL or treatment naïve (TN) or RR CLL were enrolled. In Part 1 (Dose Escalation), doses of Cirm IV q2wks x5 then q4wks of 2-16 mg/kg and 300 or 600 mg were examined. Safety of Cirm alone was assessed during the first 28 days, then Ibr was started at approved doses for each indication. Cirm 600 mg IV q2wks x3 then q4wks in combination with Ibr starting day 0 was chosen as the recommended dosing regimen for use in Part 2 (Expansion) and Part 3 (CLL only, Cirm/Ibr vs. Ibr alone). Results: Twelve evaluable MCL pts were enrolled into Part 1, and 5 into Part 2. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1-5), including pts relapsing after Ibr (4), auto-SCT (3), auto-SCT/ allo-SCT (1), auto-SCT/CAR-T (1). In CLL, 34 evaluable pts (12 TN and 22 RR) enrolled into Part 1 (18) or Part 2 (16). At least 74% of CLL pts in Parts 1 and 2 were high risk as determined by unmutated IGHV, del17p, and/or del11q. In Part 3, 22 evaluable pts received Cirm/Ibr (15) or Ibr (7). As of the 30OCT2020 safety cut-off for MCL and CLL, common TEAEs (all grades) included diarrhea (41%), contusion (39%), fatigue (39%), URI (31%), hypertension (25%) arthralgia (23%). Grade ≥3 neutropenia was 13% and thrombocytopenia 1%. There were no Cirm dose reductions or discontinuations for toxicity. Overall, Cirm did not appear to negatively impact the safety of Ibr. Efficacy (MCL): As of the 02FEB2021 efficacy cutoff, the best response of 17 evaluable pts in Parts 1 and 2 included an objective response rate (ORR) of 82%, 41% CR/CMR, 41% PR, 12% SD, and 6% PD. CR/CMR remain durable from 8-28+ mos. Most responses occurred rapidly after ̃3 mos of Cirm/Ibr. Notably, responses were achieved in all pts who received prior SCT+/- CAR-T (4CR, 1PR) or prior Ibr (2CR, 2PR). At a median follow-up of 14.6 mos, the median PFS (mPFS) had not been reached (NR) (95% CI: 17.5, NA). Efficacy (CLL): The best response of 34 evaluable pts in Parts 1 and 2 included 91% ORR, 3% CR, 88% PR/PR-L, 9% SD, 0% PD. In Part 3, both arms achieved 100% ORR (all PRs). At a median follow-up of 20.2 mos, the mPFS was NR (95% CI: NA, NA), and the PFS estimate at 24 months was 95% for R/R, and 87% for TN, respectively, for evaluable CLL pts receiving Cirm/Ibr. Conclusions: Cirm/Ibr is a well-tolerated, active regimen in both MCL and CLL. For MCL, the mPFS of NR (95% CI: 17.5, NA) and CRR (41%), with all CRs remaining without PD, compare favorably to mPFS of 12.8 mos (95% CI 8.5-16.6) and CRR (20%) reported for single agent Ibr (Rule 2017). For CLL, the high ORR and PFS are encouraging, particularly for RR CLL. The study is ongoing, with MCL enrollment expanded to study Cirm + Ibr in pts who have had a suboptimal response to an Ibr regimen, or who have failed other approved BTKi agents. Clinical trial information: NCT03088878.

Assessment of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) cohort by agent in the phase 3 ASCENT study of patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1077-1077
Author(s):  
Joyce O'Shaughnessy ◽  
Kevin Punie ◽  
Mafalda Oliveira ◽  
Filipa Lynce ◽  
Sara M. Tolaney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Chemotherapy Agent ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

1077 Background: In pts with pretreated mTNBC, standard-of-care chemotherapy is associated with low objective response rates (ORRs) and short median progression-free survival (PFS). SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti–Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic SN-38 payload via a proprietary, hydrolyzable linker. SG received accelerated FDA approval for treatment of pts with mTNBC who have received ≥2 prior therapies for metastatic disease. The confirmatory phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455) in pts with relapsed/refractory mTNBC demonstrated a significant survival benefit of SG over TPC (median PFS: 5.6 vs 1.7 mo, HR 0.41, P< 0.0001; median overall survival [OS]: 12.1 vs 6.7 mo, HR 0.48, P< 0.0001) with a tolerable safety profile. Here we summarize efficacy results for SG vs each TPC agent in ASCENT to examine how each TPC agent performed individually. Methods: Pts had mTNBC refractory to or progressing after ≥2 prior standard chemotherapy regimens. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive SG (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or single-agent TPC (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, or gemcitabine). Primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST 1.1 by independent review in brain metastases-negative (BMNeg) pts. Secondary endpoints were ORR per RECIST 1.1, duration of response, OS, and safety. Outcomes for each of the agents in the TPC arm were analyzed and compared with SG. Results: Of 529 pts enrolled, 468 were BMNeg. Among pts in the TPC cohort (n = 233), eribulin was the most commonly chosen chemotherapy (n = 126), followed by vinorelbine (n = 47), capecitabine (n = 31), and gemcitabine (n = 29). Treatment with eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, and gemcitabine resulted in shorter median PFS vs SG (2.1, 1.6, 1.6, and 2.7 vs 5.6 mo, respectively); similar results were observed for median OS (6.9, 5.9, 5.2, and 8.4 vs 12.1 mo), ORR (5%, 4%, 6%, and 3% vs 35%), and clinical benefit rate (CBR; 8%, 6%, 10%, and 14% vs 45%). Key grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with TPC overall vs SG included neutropenia (33% vs 51%), leukopenia (5% vs 10%), fatigue (5% vs 3%), and anemia (5% vs 8%). Key grade ≥3 TRAEs with eribulin vs SG included neutropenia (30% vs 51%), leukopenia (5% vs 10%), fatigue (5% vs 3%), anemia (2% vs 8%), and peripheral neuropathy (2% vs none), respectively. The safety profiles of vinorelbine, capecitabine, and gemcitabine combined were consistent with that of TPC overall and with eribulin. One treatment-related death was reported for the TPC arm (eribulin) and none with SG. Conclusions: The efficacy benefit observed with SG vs TPC in pts with mTNBC was retained when evaluating each TPC chemotherapy agent individually. These results confirm that SG should be considered as a new standard of care in pts with pretreated mTNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02574455 .

Long-term follow-up of bintrafusp alfa, a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1, in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6020-6020
Author(s):  
Byoung Chul Cho ◽  
Amaury Daste ◽  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
Sébastien Salas ◽  
Nicolas Isambert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Bifunctional Fusion Protein

6020 Background: Bintrafusp alfa is a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of the TGF-βRII receptor (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking PD-L1. A previous report of an expansion cohort from a phase 1 study (NCT02517398) suggested that bintrafusp alfa had a manageable safety profile and early signs of clinical activity in patients with heavily pretreated, advanced SCCHN after a median follow-up of 86.4 weeks. Here we report long-term efficacy and safety for this cohort. Methods: Patients with advanced SCCHN that progressed/recurred after platinum therapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting, or < 6 months after platinum therapy in the locally advanced setting, received bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg every 2 weeks until confirmed progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or trial withdrawal. The primary endpoint was confirmed best overall response assessed per RECIST 1.1 assessed by independent review committee (IRC); safety was a secondary endpoint. Results: As of May 15, 2020, 32 patients had received bintrafusp alfa for a median of 2.8 months (range, 0.5-29.9 months), no patient remained on treatment, and median follow-up to data cutoff was 41.7 months (range, 39.8-43.5 months). The objective response rate (ORR; 13%) was unchanged since the previous report; median duration of response (DOR) was increased at 21.4 months (95% CI, 5.5 months to not reached [NR]). While the clinical activity of bintrafusp alfa may be improved in patients with HPV-positive tumors (Table), outcomes were generally similar between PD-L1 subgroups (≥1% vs < 1% tumor cells). The overall safety profile was consistent with the previous report for this cohort, without grade 4 nor 5 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); no new TRAEs of grade 3 or that led to discontinuation of bintrafusp alfa were reported. Conclusions: With a median follow-up of over 3 years in patients with heavily pretreated advanced SCCHN, bintrafusp alfa showed sustained clinical activity and 3-year OS of 24.0%, which compares favorably to historical data. Clinical activity appeared to be greater in patients with HPV-positive tumors than those with HPV-negative tumors. The safety profile was manageable and consistent with earlier analysis. Further investigation of bintrafusp alfa in SCCHN and other HPV-associated cancers is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02517398. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2020 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.02259
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and rapidly and selectively releases alkylating agents into tumor cells. The phase II HORIZON trial evaluated the efficacy of melflufen plus dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a population with an important unmet medical need. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with RRMM refractory to pomalidomide and/or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody received melflufen 40 mg intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle plus once weekly oral dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg in patients older than 75 years). The primary end point was overall response rate (partial response or better) assessed by the investigator and confirmed by independent review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The primary analysis is complete with long-term follow-up ongoing. RESULTS Of 157 patients (median age 65 years; median five prior lines of therapy) enrolled and treated, 119 patients (76%) had triple-class–refractory disease, 55 (35%) had extramedullary disease, and 92 (59%) were refractory to previous alkylator therapy. The overall response rate was 29% in the all-treated population, with 26% in the triple-class–refractory population. In the all-treated population, median duration of response was 5.5 months, median progression-free survival was 4.2 months, and median overall survival was 11.6 months at a median follow-up of 14 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 96% of patients, most commonly neutropenia (79%), thrombocytopenia (76%), and anemia (43%). Pneumonia (10%) was the most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic event. Thrombocytopenia and bleeding (both grade 3/4 but fully reversible) occurred concomitantly in four patients. GI events, reported in 97 patients (62%), were predominantly grade 1/2 (93%); none were grade 4. CONCLUSION Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM, including those with triple-class–refractory and extramedullary disease.

FCR-3 as Frontline Therapy for Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2117-2117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
Carlos E. Bueso-Ramos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Hypermutation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Consensus Primer ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Wbc Count

Abstract The combination regimen of Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab (FCR) has produced high overall response (OR) rates and complete remission (CR) rates in patients receiving this as initial treatment for CLL. Earlier studies have shown that dose-dense or dose-intensified regimens of single-agent Rituximab produced higher response rates in patients with CLL. The current regimen, FCR-3, was based on the hypothesis that increasing the amount of Rituximab in the combination might improve response rates and remission duration. Doses of chemotherapy were Fludarabine 25 mg/m2/Dx3, and Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2/Dx3 given monthly. Rituximab was given at 375 mg/m2 as the first dose and 500 mg/m2 for all subsequent doses. On each day of the chemotherapy a dose of Rituximab was given so 3 doses were given monthly. With the previous FCR regimen 45% of patients achieved a CR or nPR and had <5% CD19+ 5 positive cells in the marrow at the completion of 3 cycles of therapy (rapid response, RR). The median time to progression (TTP) in that group has not been reached; it was 3 years in patients who did not achieve that endpoint (p<.001). The current protocol aimed to increase that response rate from 45% to 60%. Sixty-five patients were treated. Eighty percent were men. The median age was 59 years (27–82). Rai Stage 3–4 disease was present in 25% of patients. Median WBC count was 92.4 x 103/ul (7.9–363). Median B2-microglobulin was 3.8 (1.6–10.1). Unfavorable FISH abnormalities were present in 35% of 52 evaluable patients. Somatic hypermutation status was available for 44 patients; 61% were unmutated. ZAP-70 expression analysis performed by immunostaining or flow cytometry was positive in 62% of 47 evaluable patients. Results of FCR-3 in comparison to FCR are shown in the table. 3 Cycles 6 Cycles No. RR(%) OR CR Flow<5% FCR 300 45 95 72 82 FCR-3 65 45 94 65 74 PCR negativity using consensus primer PCR was achieved in 49% of patients at the end of therapy. Median number of days between courses ranges from 29–35 per course (overall range 27–95). Eighty-five percent of patients completed 6 cycles. No patient has progressed with a median follow-up of 10 months. With limited follow-up the addition of 3 doses of Rituximab to FC chemotherapy does not appear to provide greater benefit than one dose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document