Low-Dose Dasatinib as Front-Line Therapy for Elderly (> 60 Years) Patients with CML

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2293-2293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Porrini ◽  
Enrico Montefusco ◽  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Paolo Vigneri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Recommended Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 2293 Background. Dasatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has 325-fold greater in vitro activity against native BCR-ABL (breakpoint cluster region-Abelson leukemia virus) compared with imatinib and can overcome primary (intrinsic) and secondary (acquired) imatinib resistance. A phase III dose optimization study showed that in patients with chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), dasatinib at 100 mg once daily improved the safety profile while maintaining efficacy compared with the previously recommended dose of 70 mg twice-daily. Few data exist on the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in elderly CML patients. Aims. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of dose reduction on dasatinib efficacy. Methods. We revised 129 unselected pts with CP CML aged >60 yrs treated in 21 Italian haematological Institution, who received dasatinib after being resistant/intolerant to imatinib. Among this group 70 pts were given dasatinib at adjusted-dosage below the standard recommended dose of 100 mg daily for > 6 months. In relation to the dose modulation, patients were divide in 2 groups: group-a (21/70, 30%) received a starting dose of 20 mg daily dose excalated to the maximum tolerated dose of 70 mg daily; group-b (49/70=70%) received a starting dose of 100 mg daily, successively adhusted according to tolerance. Sokal score was evaluable for 59/70 patients (low for 16, intermediate for 28, high for 15). All patients were analyzed for haematological, cytogenetic and molecular response. Results. All patients were fully evaluable for response at a median FU time of 25 mos (range 0,7- 56,3 mos). Eight pts (11.4%) discontinued treatment due to intolerance. Response rates were 25,7% (18pts), 24.3% (17 pts), 15.7% (11 pts), 10% (7 pts), 12.8% (9 pts) for complete haematologic response (RHC), complete cytogenetic response (RCyC), major molecular response (RMolM), complete molecular response (RMolC), partial cytogenetic response (RCyP), respectively. Median Cumulative event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21.3 and 27.3 mos respectively. We did not observe any significative difference in term of response between group A and B receiving different doses. Interestingly, 3/9 patients in group A who had a transient loss of molecular response achieved major molecular response after dose escalation to 50 mg. Conclusions: Dasatinib given at a lower dose than currently recommended is still effective in elderly CML patients. However, more close molecular monitoring is advised when lower doses are prescribed. Studies in larger series are warranted to better define optimal dose and schedule of dasatinib in this frail patient population. Disclosures: Rosti: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau.

Mutation Analysis of ABL1 Gene and its Relation to the Achievement of Major Molecular Response in Indonesian Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54
Author(s):  
Reni Widyastuti ◽  
Melva Louisa ◽  
Ikhwan Rinaldi ◽  
Riki Nova ◽  
Instiaty Instiaty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Imatinib Mesylate ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Imatinib Resistance

Background: Imatinib mesylate is the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy. Imatinib is an effective drug. However, previous studies have shown that about 20-30% of patients eventually would develop resistance to imatinib. Approximately 40% of imatinib resistance is associated with BCRABL kinase domain mutation. One of the most common and serious variations account for imatinib response is T315I of ABL1 gene. Objective: The study aimed to examine the association of T315I mutation with the ABL1 gene and its relation to major molecular response (MMR) achievement in CML patients. This study also examined other mutations adjacent to T315I, i.e., F311I, F317L, and different possible variations in the ABL1 gene. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study on Indonesian CML patients in chronic phase. We analyzed 120 blood samples from patients in chronic phase who have received imatinib mesylate (IM) for ≥12 months. Results: There were no T315I, F311I, and F317L mutations found in this study. However, we found another variation, which was 36 substitutions from A to G at position 163816 of ABL1 gene (according to NG_012034.1). Conclusions: We found no T315I, F311I, and F317L mutations in this study. Our findings suggest that there might be other factors that influenced the MMR achievement in our study patients. However, there were 36 substitutions from A to G at position 163.816 (according to NG_012034.1) that needed further examination to explore the significance of this mutation in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Nilotinib is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib resistance or intolerance: 24-month follow-up results

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 117 (4) ◽  
pp. 1141-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Francis J. Giles ◽  
Kapil N. Bhalla ◽  
Javier Pinilla-Ibarz ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Abl Tyrosine Kinase

Abstract Nilotinib is a potent selective inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase approved for use in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), and in CML-CP and CML-accelerated phase after imatinib failure. Nilotinib (400 mg twice daily) was approved on the basis of the initial results of this phase 2 open-label study. The primary study endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving major cytogenetic response (CyR). All patients were followed for ≥ 24 months or discontinued early. Of 321 patients, 124 (39%) continue on nilotinib treatment. Overall, 59% of patients achieved major CyR; this was complete CyR (CCyR) in 44%. Of patients achieving CCyR, 56% achieved major molecular response. CyRs were durable, with 84% of patients who achieved CCyR maintaining response at 24 months. The overall survival at 24 months was 87%. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate, generally transient, and easily managed. This study indicates that nilotinib is effective, with a manageable safety profile, and can provide favorable long-term benefits for patients with CML-CP after imatinib failure. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00109707.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety Of Dasatinib For Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase In Japan

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1493-1493
Author(s):  
Kohei Yamaguchi ◽  
Kazunori Murai ◽  
Shigeki Ito ◽  
Tomoaki Akagi ◽  
Kazuei Ogawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Once Daily

Abstract Background Dasatinib is a second-generation BCR-ABL inhibitor that has a 325-fold higher potency than imatinib and a 16-fold higher potency than nilotinib in vitro. The previous report from the global DASISION trial showed dasatinib resulted in significantly higher and faster rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) compared with imatinib. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dasatinib in patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) in Japan. Methods Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were include in this study. Patients received dasatinib 100mg once daily. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the rate of major molecular response (MMR) by 12 months. MMR defined as a BCR-ABL transcript level of 0.1% or lower on the International scale by means of a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in peripheral blood. Secondary end points were the rate of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) by 12 months, the rate of MR4.5 (either (i) detectable disease with <0.0032% BCR-ABL1 IS or (ii) undetectable disease in cDNA with >32,000 ABL1 transcripts in the same volume of cDNA used to test for BCR-ABL1) by 12 months and adverse events of dasatinib (UMIN #000006358). Results Eighty newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were included in this study. All except one patient administered dasatinib 100 mg once daily. One patient was withdrawal before administration of dasatinib. So far, there were 71 patients with 6 months follow-up and 51 patients with 12 months follow-up. The estimated MMR rates were 69.5 % (95%CI, 58.7-80.3 %) by 6 months and 82.7% (95%CI, 73.0-92.4 %) by 12 months. The estimated MR4.5 rates were 27.1 % (95%CI, 16.7-37.5 %) by 6 months and 48.9% (95%CI, 36.0-61.7 %) by 12 months. Only 6 patients were withdrawal because of adverse event (5 patients) and ineffectiveness (1 patient). Conclusion Dasatinib treatment results in higher rates of molecular responses in newly diagnosed CML-CP patients in Japan. Dasatinib as the first-line agent might be acceptable for CML-CP patients because of better clinical efficacy and less toxicity. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Five-year follow-up results of imatinib 400 mg in late chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7041-7041
Author(s):  
I. Iacobucci ◽  
F. Palandri ◽  
M. Amabile ◽  
A. Poerio ◽  
S. Soverini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Bone Marrow Cells ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Phase Duration ◽  
Drug Of Choice

7041 Background: Imatinib (IM) is the drug of choice for the treatment of Ph+ CML, where a complete cytogenetic response (CCgR) is achieved in more than 80% of early chronic phase (ECP) patients, with a 6-year survival of 89%. Methods: We monitored the hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular response to imatinib in a cohort of 295 patients with Ph+ CML in late chronic phase (LCP) who were enrolled in a national prospective study of the GIMEMA CML Working Party, with focus on the rate of major molecular response and on progression-free survival and overall survival of complete cytogenetic responders. Patients were monitored for cytogenetic and molecular response every 6 months. Cytogenetics was performed on bone marrow cells with conventional methods. Molecular response was assessed on peripheral blood samples by quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR) using TaqMan methodology and expressing the results as a ratio of BCR-ABL to ABL x100. The duration of chronic phase prior to IM treatment ranged from 1 to 202 months (median 38). Treatment was IM 400 mg daily through all the study period, with a few dose increase to 600 or 800 mg. Results: 158 patients (54%) achieved a CCgR in 3 to 62 months (median 6) after the first IM dose and 124 of them (78%) are still in continuous CCgR after 5 years whereas 34 patients lost the CCgR, 23 of them within 24 months after the CCgR achievement. For the 158 patients the 5-year survival free from progression to accelerated or blastic phase is 95% and overall survival is 91%. 114 patients were evaluable for molecular response and 68% of them were in major molecular response with a BCR-ABL/ABL ratio lower than 0.05. Conclusions: We showed that for the complete cytogenetic responders progression-free and overall survival are likely to be as good as for ECP patients, suggesting that the quality of the cytogenetic response is prognostically more important than the chronic phase duration before IM start. Supported by European LeukemiaNet, COFIN 2003, AIL, AIRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Patients with Chronic Phase CML in the IRIS Study Who Receive Imatinib Mesylate (IM) 2nd Line after Prior IFN/Ara-C Have Sustained Complete Cytogenetic and Major Molecular Response Rates Similar to 1st Line IM Patients.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2139-2139
Author(s):  
Jaspal Kaeda ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Jerald Radich ◽  
Susan Branford ◽  
Charlene So ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Progression Rate ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Real Time Quantitative Pcr ◽  
Log Reduction ◽  
Advanced Phase

Abstract The IRIS study compared IM and interferon+cytarabine (IFN/Ara-C) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed CML-CP (n=553 per arm). IFN/Ara-C pts. could cross over to IM if they satisfied predetermined criteria for disease, either resistance/refractoriness (=resistance), or intolerance of or reluctance to continue the combination (=lack of resistance). Pts who received IM 1st line or 2nd line who achieved a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) had BCR-ABL transcript levels measured serially by real-time quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). Results were expressed as log reduction in BCR-ABL/BCR from a standardized baseline value for untreated pts. Yearly rates of 3 log reduction (Major Molecular Response, MMR) from IM treatment starting date were estimated by multiplying the CCyR rate by the MMR rate in CCyR pts at each time point. Overall, of 553 pts who received 1st line IM 82% achieved CCyR, an estimated 69% during the 1st year (yr) of treatment. Of 359 pts who received 2nd line IM, 80% achieved CCyR, 62% during the 1st yr; rates were lower in pts with resistance than in those without resistance to prior IFN/Ara-C (75% vs 85% overall, p=0.025, 56% vs 68% within first yr, p<0.01). Best observed and estimated molecular responses for CCyR pts. are summarized in the table. The median follow-up for BCR-ABL evaluation on 1st line vs 2nd line IM was 45 and 35 months, respectively. Molecular response on 1st- and 2nd-line IM in the IRIS study 1st-line IM 2nd-line IM after IFN/Ara-C All pts N = 553 All pts N = 359 Resistance N =174 Lack of resistance N =185 CcyR 454 (82%) 288 (80%) 131 (75%) 157 (85%) Pts with CCyR during treatment and PCR sample(s) N = 401 N = 211 N = 98 N = 113 –≥3 log reduction (MMR) 323 (81%) 154 (73%) 63 (64%) 91 (81%) –≥ 4 log reduction 216 (54%) 92 (44%) 35 (36%) 57 (50%) Estimated % of all pts who achieve CCyR and MMR by – 1 yr 36 24 19 28 – 2 yr 59 38 29 45 – 4 yr 67 67 58 72 – 5 yr 85 82 78 84 Overall response rates were similar between 1st and 2nd line IM pts, although responses in 2nd line IM pts may have occurred more slowly. However, the number of RQ-PCR samples between 1 and 2 yrs of 2nd line IM was limited as samples were not obtained routinely between Jan 2003 and Aug 2004. In pts who achieved CCyR, the estimated 5-yr progression rate to advanced CML phase was 3% for 1st line IM and 4% for 2nd line IM; using the broader definition of progression (including events such as CML-unrelated deaths and loss of MCyR/CHR) the progression rates were 9% and 8% respectively. In both 1st and 2nd line IM pts with CCyR who also achieved MMR, only an estimated 1% progressed to advanced phase within 5 yrs; the estimated broadly defined event rates were 5% and 4% respectively. In summary, for 1st line IM patients with a RQ-PCR follow-up of up to 5 yrs, an estimated 85% achieved MMR at 5 yrs compared with 59% at 2 yrs. Cytogenetic and molecular response rates were similar for 1st line and 2nd line IM pts, primarily due to responses in pts who crossed over for reasons other than resistance or refractoriness. For IM pts the rate of progression to advanced CML phase at 5 yrs was low in those with CCyR and even lower in pts who also achieved MMR.

Dasatinib Induces a Higher Molecular Response in Japanese Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia After Imatinib Failure Than in Western Populations: Kanto CML Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4448-4448
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Hatta ◽  
Koiti Inokuchi ◽  
Takashi Kumagai ◽  
Kazuteru Ohashi ◽  
Atsushi Shinagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Dasatinib Treatment

Abstract Abstract 4448 Background Dasatinib is a potent tyrosine kinase inhibitor and is highly effective against chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In Japan, dasatinib was approved in 2009 as a second-line therapy for CML after imatinib failure. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study to investigate the efficacy and safety of dasatinib treatment in Japanese CML-chronic phase (CP) patients with intolerance or resistance to imatinib. Patients and method CML-CP patients who were unable to continue imatinib therapy (400 mg/day) because of adverse events were registered as being intolerant to imatinib. Resistance to imatinib was defined as failure to achieve a partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) after three months of therapy or a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) after six months of therapy or the expression of over 100 copies/μg RNA of BCR-ABL after 12 months of therapy. For these patients, dasatinib (100 mg) was administered once daily. Patients with T315I and F317I mutations in BCR-ABL were excluded. Major and complete molecular responses (MMR and CMR) were centrally evaluated using RQ-PCR at the BML laboratory. When the study was designed, a conversion factor (CF) had not been introduced to Japan for the adoption of international scale (IS). Subsequently, 0.1% IS (MMR) was defined as being equivalent to 731 copies/μg RNA based on the BML laboratory specific CF obtained in 2011, and 11 patients were identified as having an MMR at the time of study enrollment. Results A total of 61 patients were accrued from 21 centers: 26 with intolerance, and 35 with resistance. The median age was 58 years (range, 16 – 91 years). The median follow-up duration was nine months (range, 0.5 – 18 months). An MMR+CMR was observed in 27 out of 45 patients (60.0%, 13 CMR and 14 MMR) at six months and in 22 out of 31 patients (71.0%, 8 CMR and 14 MMR) at nine months after treatment with dasatinib, respectively. Excluding the patients with an MMR at the time of registration, dasatinib had induced an MMR+CMR in 21 out of 39 patients (53.9%, 11 CMR and 10 MMR) at six months and 19 out of 28 patients (67.9%, 7 CMR and 12 MMR) at nine months, respectively. The response rates in intolerant and resistant patients were comparable. Twelve patients discontinued dasatinib treatment because of drug toxicity (four patients), patient request (one), disease progression or the development of a T315I mutation (three), or unknown causes (four). Although grade 1 – 2 pleural effusion was observed in five patients, no severe cases were observed. Ten mutations in BCR-ABL occurred in eight patients during dasatinib treatment; a low IC50 of dasatinib against tumor cells in five of these mutations (M244V, M351T, F359I, F359V, H396R), an intermediate value against tumor cells in one of these mutations (Q252H), a high value against tumor cells in two of these mutations in three patients (T315I in two patients and E459K), and an unknown sensitivity against tumor cells in one of these mutations (A397P). Patients with M244V+Q252H, H396R, or T315I did not respond to dasatinib treatment. Conclusion Dasatinib is a safe and efficacious alternative for the treatment of CML following imatinib failure. Because MMR rate in the global study was 31% at one year and 44% at 5 years, the molecular response rate among Japanese patients was higher than that in western populations. Mutation in BCR-ABL remains a major issue. Disclosures: Okamoto: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Efficacy of Nilotinib in EARLY Chronic PHASE CML Patients WHO Have Suboptimal Cytogenetic or Molecular Response to Imatinib. A Multicentric Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4454-4454
Author(s):  
Luigia Luciano ◽  
Elisa Seneca ◽  
Mario Annunziata ◽  
Luca Pezzullo ◽  
Paolo Danise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Treatment Resistance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 4454 The CML-CP suboptimal responders rappresent an eterogenous group of patients in which it is possible either to obtain an optimal renponse or to experiment a failure. The Clinical data of MDACC, Hammersmith Hospital and GIMEMA group showed that patients with suboptimal response at 6 and 12 months have worse long term outcomes than patients with optimal responses, particularly if the suboptimal response occurs early in the treatment, suggesting an advantage for pts with early major molecular response, expecially for event free survival and progression free survival. Moreover, recently, the German group has shown the benefit of early major molecular response on overall survival too. So earlier use of nilotinib or dasatinib in suboptimal CP CML may be beneficial in two potential ways: by promoting an early response, thereby potentially improving prognosis; by avoiding the development of treatment resistance. The clinical challenge in this setting would be to accurately identify patients who are likely to fail treatment with TKIs. This retrospective analysis was designed to explore the efficacy of the early switch to Nilotinib in patients with suboptimal responses to imatinib (IM) according to ELN raccomandations. In this multicentric retrospective study, 15 CML-CP patients with suboptimal response to IM within 24 months from diagnosis were evaluated: 4pts with a low, 3 with intermedied and 5 with high Sokal score. The best response to IM was CCyR for 6 pts, PCyR for one pt and Complete Hematological Response for 5 pts. As for suboptimal responses, 5 pts were defined in suboptimal cytogenetic response: 2 pts at 12 months and 2 pts at 6 months; 6pts were 18 months suboptimal molecular responders and 1 pt had a loss of CCyR at 12 months. All patients were switched to Nilotinib 400 mg twice daily. Bone marrow was done at baseline in all pts and at 3,6,12 and 18 months in cytogenetic suboptimal pts, while the molecular analysis was performed on peripheral blood every three months in all other pts. 12 pts have been treated with Nilotinib for a median of 17,5 months (range 3–37), 9 patients for ≥ 12 months. Before switching to Nilotinib, pts were treated with IM 400 mg once daily apart for 2 patients who needed an adjustment dose to 300 mg and 600 mg for toxicity and suboptimal response, respectively. Among 6 pts with suboptimal CyR, 4 obtained CCyR, 3 at 3 months and one at 6 months; 2 pts had any response at the milestones timepoints and they switched to another therapy. All pts with molecular suboptimal response obtained MMR at 3 months apart for one, who showed MMR at 12 months. Nilotinib was well tolerated in all 12 pts; only one developed a moderate transaminase elevation. A brief drug intrerruption was sufficient to manage this adverse event. Our data confirm that second generation TKIs give deeper and earlier responses also in second line treatment, garantendo optimal PFS and OS. In our serie infact, Nilotinib treatment results in high and relatively quick cytogenetic and molecular response rate in CML –CP-pts with suboptimal response to IM. These results demonstrate that the early switch to Nilotinib could be raccomanded in suboptimal responders in order to improve the outcome of this kind of pts and strongly suggest the second generation TKI as first line therapy in CML patients. A larger patient population and a longer period of observation could allow to confirm these preliminary data. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The Impact of Cytogenetic Response At 6 Months of Therapy in Global Survival of Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Imatinib in the South of Brazil

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4453-4453
Author(s):  
Laura Fogliatto ◽  
Marcelo Capra ◽  
Mariza Schaan ◽  
Mario Sérgio Fernandes ◽  
Tito Vanelli Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Imatinib Therapy ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Treatment ◽  
Major Molecular Response ◽  
Global Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4453 Background Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib leads to disease remission in a majority of patient, but in some patients (pts) controlling the disease remains a challenge. One of the proposed prognostic factors for identifying this subset of pts is the treatment response in the first months of therapy. Objectives We conducted a study to evaluate the importance of the early complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and the factors associated with its achievement. Methods This is a retrospective study in a cohort of pts with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) enrolled in 3 Hematology centers in South Brazil. All pts received imatinib 400mg as first or second-line therapy. Early-imatinib treatment was considered when imatinib started before 12 months (mo) from diagnosis. Patient evaluation and response criteria followed the ELN recommendations. The ACE-27 (Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27) is a 27 item comorbidity index for patients with cancer and assign weights from 1 to 3 based on the dysfunction grade of each condition (mild, moderate and severe, respectively). An ACE-27 score was applied to each patient. Imatinib suspensions were considered if superior to 20 days at any point during therapy. Global survival (GS) was measured from the start of imatinib to the date of death from any cause. Results We analyzed data from 181 pts with CP-CML diagnosed since 1990. The median age at diagnosis was 48 yr (4 – 85) and 55% were male. The median time from diagnosis to imatinib was 7 mo (0 – 178) and 71% pts were early-imatinib treated. Prior therapy with interferon was used in 60% pts. The median of follow-up was 47 mo. With 6 months of imatinib therapy, 123 pts (68%) achieved CCyR, in this group the four year global survival was 97%. 58 (32%) were not in CCyR at 6 months of therapy, in this group the four year GS was 87%. This difference was significant (P=.024; Figure 1). The chance of achieving major molecular response (MMR) during follow up was 79% for the pts with CCyR at 6 months compared to 53% for the group with no CCyR at 6 months (P<0,001). Some factors were associated with reduced chance of CCyR at 6 months. In a multivariate analysis, the pts with late-onset imatinib treatment (more than 12 mo from diagnosis) had a CCyR rate of 31%, in contrast, the pts who started imatinib before 12 mo had a rate of 50% (P=0,02). The pts with good adherence to treatment had greater CCyR rate than those with poor adherence (interruption greater than 20 days), 51,4% and 35%, respectively (P=0,04). Comorbidity measured by ACE-27 score also influenced the CCyR rates at 6 months: 54% of score 0 (no comorbidity) patients achieved CCyR, compared to 30% of pts with score 1 (mild comorbidity), 33% of pts with score 2 (moderate) and 47% of pts with score 3 (severe) (P=0,009). The greater CCyR rate in the severe comorbidity group probably lacks significance due to the reduced number of pts in this group (22). Conclusions A great proportion of pts achieve CCyR after 6 months of imatinib therapy, nevertheless, the pts who achieve CCyR by 6 months of therapy have greater proportion of major molecular response and global survival. Imatinib therapy should be started as soon as possible and additional efforts must be taken to avoid nonadherence. Finally, special attention should be given to pts with comorbidities as their results tend to be worse. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Impact of Baseline BCR-ABL Mutations on Response to Nilotinib in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (25) ◽  
pp. 4204-4210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Hughes ◽  
Giuseppe Saglio ◽  
Susan Branford ◽  
Simona Soverini ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Imatinib Resistant

Purpose Nilotinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP; CML-CP) and accelerated phase (AP; CML-AP) who are resistant to or intolerant of prior imatinib therapy. In this subanalysis of a phase II study of nilotinib in patients with imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant CML-CP, the occurrence and impact of baseline and newly detectable BCR-ABL mutations were assessed. Patients and Methods Baseline mutation data were assessed in 281 (88%) of 321 patients with CML-CP in the phase II nilotinib registration trial. Results Among imatinib-resistant patients, the frequency of mutations at baseline was 55%. After 12 months of therapy, major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was achieved in 60%, complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) in 40%, and major molecular response (MMR) in 29% of patients without baseline mutations versus 49% (P = .145), 32% (P = .285), and 22% (P = .366), respectively, of patients with mutations. Responses in patients who harbored mutations with high in vitro sensitivity to nilotinib (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] ≤ 150 nM) or mutations with unknown nilotinib sensitivity were equivalent to those responses for patients without mutations (not significant). Patients with mutations that were less sensitive to nilotinib in vitro (IC50 > 150 nM; Y253H, E255V/K, F359V/C) had less favorable responses, as 13%, 43%, and 9% of patients with each of these mutations, respectively, achieved MCyR; none achieved CCyR. Conclusion For most patients with imatinib resistance and with mutations, nilotinib offers a substantial probability of response. However, mutational status at baseline may influence response. Less sensitive mutations that occurred at three residues defined in this study, as well as the T315I mutation, may be associated with less favorable responses to nilotinib.

scholarly journals Bosutinib Versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results From the BELA Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (28) ◽  
pp. 3486-3492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Tim H. Brümmendorf ◽  
Irina Dyagil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Blast Phase ◽  
End Point

Purpose Bosutinib is an oral Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The phase III Bosutinib Efficacy and Safety in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (BELA) trial compared bosutinib with imatinib in newly diagnosed, chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients and Methods A total of 502 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to bosutinib 500 mg per day or imatinib 400 mg per day. Results The complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) rate at 12 months was not different for bosutinib (70%; 95% CI, 64% to 76%) versus imatinib (68%; 95% CI, 62% to 74%; two-sided P = .601); therefore, the study did not achieve its primary end point. The major molecular response (MMR) rate at 12 months was higher with bosutinib (41%; 95% CI, 35% to 47%) compared with imatinib (27%; 95% CI, 22% to 33%; two-sided P < .001). Time to CCyR and MMR was faster with bosutinib compared with imatinib (two-sided P < .001 for both). On-treatment transformation to accelerated/blast phase occurred in four patients (2%) on bosutinib compared with 10 patients (4%) on imatinib. A total of three CML-related deaths occurred on the bosutinib arm compared with eight on the imatinib arm. The safety profiles of bosutinib and imatinib were distinct; GI and liver-related events were more frequent with bosutinib, whereas neutropenia, musculoskeletal disorders, and edema were more frequent with imatinib. Conclusion This ongoing trial did not meet its primary end point of CCyR at 12 months, despite the observed higher MMR rate at 12 months, faster times to CCyR and MMR, fewer on-treatment transformations to accelerated/blast phase, and fewer CML-related deaths with bosutinib compared with imatinib. Each drug had a distinct safety profile.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document