The Association of the Polymorphisms of IMPDH1 Gene and Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease After Related and Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2377-2377
Author(s):  
Lifei Zhang ◽  
Haowen Xiao ◽  
Weijie Cao ◽  
Xiaoyu Lai ◽  
Yi Luo ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2377 Background: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been widely used in the prophylaxis and treatment of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) is the target of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite of MMF. IMPDH is the key enzyme in the de-novo synthesis of nucleotides and induces the rate-limiting step in this synthesis. There are two isoforms of IMPDH, IMPDH1 is constructively expressed in all cell types, whereas IMPDH2 is only expressed in particular cell types. The proliferation of lymphocytes depends on the synthesis of nucleotides by IMPDH, whereas other types of cells have a salvage pathway for the synthesis of nucleotides. This makes MPA a drug that specifically inhibits the proliferation of the lymphocytes. Interindividual variability in IMPDH activity has been observed in healthy volunteers as well as transplant patients. The considerable variability in baseline IMPDH activity and MPA response may logically be under the control of genetic variation within the IMPDH gene or in gene expression. Analysis of genetic variants could provide the explantation for the variability of IMPDH activity and MMF response in transplant patients. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of IMPDH1 gene has recently reported to be relevant to acute rejection in renal transplant patients receiving MMF. There are no data about the impact of the polymorphisms of IMPDH1 gene on the outcome of allo-HSCT. The objective of this study was to investigate IMPDH1 genetic variants in allo-HSCT patients and to retrospectively look for the association of these polymorphisms with aGVHD. Methods: The entire study population consisted of 240 consecutive pairs of transplant recipients and their donors who were transplanted from 2001 to 2009 in our Center, including 138 pairs of recipients and their unrelated donors and 102 pairs of recipients and their HLA-identical sibling donors. Both in the unrelated and sibling transplantation cohorts, the patients received the same GVHD prophylaxis consisting of cyclosporin A, a short-term methotrexate and MMF. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples obtained from recipients and donors before transplantation. Four SNPs of IVS7 +125 G>A (rs2278293), IVS8-106 G>A (rs2278294), Exon15 1572 G>A (rs2228075) and 5` flanking region C>T (rs714510) in IMPDH1 gene were analyzed by Multiplex SnaPshot. Results: (1) The IMPDH1 IVS8 -106 G/G genotypes in recipients were significantly associated with a higher incidence of aGVHD than recipients with other genotypes either in the unrelated transplantation cohort or in the sibling transplantation cohort (in the unrelated cohort: 83.3% vs 63.9%, P=0.048; in the sibling cohort: 47.6% vs17.3%, P=0.008). Furthermore, in the unrelated transplantation cohort, the IMPDH1 IVS8 -106 G/G genotypes in recipients were also associated with a higher incidence of grades II-IV aGVHD (63.3% vs 38.0%, P=0.021). However donor IMPDH1 IVS8 -106 genotype had no significant influence on the incidence of aGVHD. (2) In the combined cohort, multivariate analysis confirmed that recipients with the IVS8 -106 G/G genotype were significantly associated with higher risk of developing aGVHD (RR=2.018, 95%CI: 1.354–3.009, P=0.001). Other three variables associated with the risk of aGVHD were myeloablative conditioning (RR=3.309, 95%CI: 1.538–7.121, P=0.002), donor female and recipient male (RR=1.679, 95%CI: 1.139–2.475, P=0.009), and unrelated donor (RR=4.633, 95%CI: 2.934–7.315, P<0.001). (3) The genotypes of IVS7 +125, Exon15 1572 and 5` flanking region were not found to be associated with the risk of aGVHD. Conclusions: These results, which is the first report of IMPDH1 gene polymorphic features of Chinese population with the risk of aGVHD, suggest an interaction of the recipient IMPDH1 IVS8 -106 genotypes on the risk of aGVHD. These results are helpful for predicting allo-HSCT outcome, monitoring MMF therapy on an individual patient basis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 330-336
Author(s):  
Irina Gribkova ◽  
I. Ishmatova ◽  
Mariya Davydovskaya ◽  
K. Kokushkin

The aim of the study was to systematize and summarize the current available data on ruxolitinib use in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) to improve its results. The review includes data from foreign and domestic articles found in the PubMed and elibrary.ru databases describing the results of the use of ruxolitinib in patients with MF prior to allo-HSCT, including clinical cases, original scientific studies and reviews. It is reported that ruxolitinib therapy is safe, reduces mortality in the early post-transplantation period, reduces the incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, and decreases the frequency of relapses. Clinical improvement with ruxolitinib therapy prior to allo-HSCT can be considered a prognostically favorable factor.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruonan Li ◽  
Jingke Tu ◽  
Jingyu Zhao ◽  
Hong Pan ◽  
Liwei Fang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are an emerging prophylaxis option for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) recipients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA), but studies have reported inconsistent results. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of MSCs as prophylaxis for GVHD in SAA patients with haplo-HSCT. Methods Studies were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and http://clinicaltrials.gov from establishment to February 2020. Twenty-nine single-arm studies (n = 1456) were included, in which eight (n = 241) studies combined with MSCs and eleven (n = 1215) reports without MSCs in haplo-HSCT for SAA patients. The primary outcomes were the incidences of GVHD. Other outcomes included 2-year overall survival (OS) and the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the results pooled through random or fixed effects models. Results Between MSCs and no MSCs groups, no significant differences were found in the pooled incidences of acute GVHD (56.0%, 95% CI 48.6–63.5% vs. 47.2%, 95% CI 29.0–65.4%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.91–2.25; p = 0.123), grade II–IV acute GVHD (29.8%, 95% CI 24.1–35.5% vs. 30.6%, 95% CI 26.6–34.6%; OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.70–1.32; p = 0.889), and chronic GVHD (25.4%, 95% CI 19.8–31.0% vs. 30.0%, 95% CI 23.3–36.6%; OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.56–1.11; p = 0.187). Furtherly, there was no obvious difference in 2-year OS (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.60–1.61; p = 1.000) and incidence of CMV infection (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40–1.92; p = 0.018). Conclusions Our meta-analysis indicates that the prophylactic use of MSC co-transplantation is not an effective option for SAA patients undergoing haplo-HSCT. Hence, the general co-transplantation of MSCs for SAA haplo-HSCT recipients may lack evidence-based practice.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Sachin Punatar ◽  
Shruti Kandekar ◽  
Navin Khattry ◽  
Anant Gokarn ◽  
Kumar Prabhash ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the preferred treatment option for patients with several hematologic disorders and immunodeficiency syndromes. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is an immune mediated post-transplant complication which has a major impact on long term transplant outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Current efforts are focused on identification of new markers that serve as potential predictors of GVHD and other post-transplant clinical outcomes. METHODS: This study includes donor harvests collected from twenty-three allogeneic donors during period 2008–2009 and respective transplant recipients followed for clinical outcomes till March 2019. Percent CD26+ and CD34+ cells in donor harvest were analyzed using flow cytometry. Percent expression and infused dose of CD26+ and CD34+ cells were evaluated for association with various clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Total 23 healthy donors 28 years (13 males), and transplant recipients with median age 24 years (17 males) formed the study cohort. The diagnosis included malignant (n= 13) and non-malignant (n= 10) disorders. Median CD34brCD45lo HSC expression was 057% (IQR 024–103) while median CD26 expression was 1964% (IQR 896–3356) of all nucleated cells. CD26 expression was associated with donor age (P= 0.37). CD26 percent expression correlated with WBC engraftment (P= 0.015) and with acute GVHD (P= 0.023) whereas infused CD26 cell dose correlated with WBC engraftment (P= 0.004) and risk of CMV reactivation (P= 0.020). There was no statistically significant correlation of either CD26 expression or cell dose with chronic GVHD, EFS or OS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document