Melphalan, Thalidomide and Prednisone (MPT) Combined with Oral Panobinostat In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory MM: a Phase I-II Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3019-3019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Offidani ◽  
Federica Cavallo ◽  
Claudia Polloni ◽  
Anna Marina Liberati ◽  
Stelvio Ballanti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Haematological Toxicity ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Histone Proteins ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3019 Background: Panobinostat (LBH-589) is a pan-deacetilase inhibitor that targets histone proteins increasing tumor suppressor gene activities leading to cell-cycle and differentiation arrest besides to target non-histone proteins such as HSP90, aggressomes, p53, HIF-1a, and a-tubulin somehow promoting cell death. Panobinostat, combined with steroids and/or immunomodulatory drugs, demonstrated additive/synergistic activity in Multiple Myeloma (MM) and ability to overcome previous chemoresistance. Several combination studies with Panobinostat plus novel drugs are now ongoing in MM. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, phase I-II study exploring the combination of a standard therapy such as MPT (Melphalan 0.18 mg/kg per os for 4 days, Prednisone 1.5 mg/kg per os for 4 days, Thalidomide 50 mg/day continuously) with Panobinostat 15 mg p.o. thrice weekly for 3 weeks in a 28-day cycle to assess safety profile and activity of this combination in patients with relapsed/refractory MM having adequate performance status and haematological, cardiac, liver and neurological functions. The study was designed according to the Briant and Day method that plans a “dose-escalation phase” to determine both the MTD and the activity of the study drug and an “expansion-phase” in which the MTD of the study drug is used to further assess its safety and efficacy. Despite in the first phase of this study 19 patients were planned according to the study design, protocol was amended after 13 patients had been enrolled since more than 50% grade 3–4 toxicity occurred although response criteria were met. Therefore, Panobinostat was reduced to 10 mg p.o. thrice weekly for 3 weeks in a 28-day cycle whereas the dose of drugs of the MPT combination was not modified. Toxicity and response were assessed according to CTC version 4 and IMWG criteria, respectively. Results: As of February 2010, 24 patients were enrolled in this study. Median age was 71.5 years (range 40–81 years) and 12 patients (50%) had ISS 2–3 score. Patients had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range 1–6) and 5 (21%) three or more prior lines of therapy. Sixteen (73%), 13 (54%), 18 (75%), 11 (46%) and 9 (37.5%) patients had been previously treated with ASCT, thalidomide, bortezomib, lenalidomide and all 3 new-drugs, respectively. Seven patients (29%) were refractory to the last therapy. Twelve patients (50%) had a disease history longer than 5 years. In the first 13 patients treated with Panobinostat 15 mg, grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 6 (46%) and 9 patients (69%), respectively. Moreover, 4 patients (31%) developed non-hematological adverse events such as fatigue, constipation, infection and arrythmia. In the group of 11 patients treated with Panobinostat 10 mg, grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia decreased to 18% (2 patients) but neutropenia was still high (8 patients: 72.5%). Three patients (27%) had grade 3–4 non-hematological toxicity (one fatigue and two constipation). No patients had QTcF prolongation or severe neuropathy. Dose adjustment was necessary in 9 patients (37.5%, all due to hematological toxicity) while 6 patients (25%) interrupted the protocol because of side effects (5 due to no resolution of grade 3–4 hematological toxicity within 4 weeks and one due to atrial fibrillation). One patient (4%) died on study due to sepsis during prolonged neutropenia. Response ≥ PR were observed in 12 patients (50%) including 4 VGPR and 8 PR. Additionally, 2 patients had MR and 8 SD. Only 2 patients progressed during treatment. There was no difference between the two cohorts of patients (Panobinostat 15 mg and Panobinostat 10 mg) in terms of response ≥ PR (54% vs 45.5%) or disease progression (7.5% vs 9%). Notably, response was obtained also in 2/7 patients (28%) who progressed during bortezomib or IMIDs. Conclusions: This study suggests that MPT-Panobinostat combination has an encouraging anti-myeloma activity since responses were still seen in patients with advanced stage or resistant to new drugs diseases. Different schedules of Panobinostat/melphalan should be explored to reduce haematological toxicity. Disclosures: Offidani: Celgene: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Panobinostat in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Cavallo:Celgene: Honoraria. Polloni:Celgene: Honoraria. Ballanti:Celgene: Honoraria. Catarini:Celgene: Honoraria. Alesiani:Celgene: Honoraria. Corvatta:Celgene: Honoraria. Gentili:Celgene: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Leoni:Celgene: Honoraria. Palumbo:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1874-1874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Esther Masih-Khan ◽  
Arooj Khan ◽  
Saima Dean ◽  
Peter Anglin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1874 Poster Board I-899 Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and dexamethasone is an effective regimen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts), with an overall response rate of 60.6% and median time to progression (TTP) of 13.4 months (Dimopoulos MA, et al, Leukemia 2009 Jul 23 [Epub ahead of print]). Oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone is an older regimen with excellent patient tolerance, and we sought to enhance the efficacy of lenalidomide by adding oral cyclophosphamide and prednisone in this phase I-II trial. The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide on days 1, 8 and 15; lenalidomide on days 1–21; and prednisone 100 mg every other day in a 28 day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given to all pts as DVT prophylaxis. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 by 3 dose escalation design. Between 11/2007–07/2009, 31 pts with relapsed/refractory MM who had not previously received lenalidomide were entered onto study. Median age was 61 (40–78) years and 61% were male. Immunoglobulin subtype was IgG in 19 pts (61%), IgA in 8 pts (26%) and light chain only in 4 pts (13%). Median number of prior regimens was 2 (1–5) and 28 pts had undergone previous ASCT, including double transplants in 6 pts. Prior therapy included thalidomide in 9 (29%) and bortezomib in 15 (48%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 13 pts; one had 13q deletion but none had t(4;14) or p53 deletion. At the time of protocol entry, median β 2-microglobulin level was 246 (92–767) nm/L, albumin 39 (34–48) g/L, creatinine 83 (50–126) μmol/L, platelet count 230 (75–337) × 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.1–6.1) x 109/L. Protocol treatment is summarized in Table 1. Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 3–4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia in 5 pts (16%) and neutropenia in 9 pts (29%). These were managed with dose reduction and/or growth factor support. Four episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred. Other grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included abdominal pain/bacteremia in 1 pt in cohort 1; hypokalemia in 1 pt in cohort 2; and DVT in 2 pts, dizziness in 2 pts and fatigue in 1 pt in cohort 3. Using the International uniform response criteria (Durie BG, et al, Leukemia 2006; 20:1467–1473), the best response was documented at a median of 6 (1–5) cycles and included the following: dose level 1 (1 CR, 2 PR); dose level 2 (1 VGPR, 2 PR); dose level 3 (5 CR, 9 VGPR, 9 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease). At a median follow-up (F/U) of 12 (8–21) months, 20 pts remain on study, 2 have withdrawn and 9 pts have progressed at a median of 9 (4–13) months; only 1 one has died (due to MM). We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28 day cycle with minimal toxicity; 2) the overall response rate (CR + VGPR + PR) in 31 pts to date is 93%; 3) at a median F/U of 1 year, only 9 pts (29%) have progressed; 4) longer follow-up is required to assess the TTP and survival of the CPR regimen. Disclosures: Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in combination with drugs other than dexamethasone. Anglin:Celgene: Honoraria. Chen:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria. Mikhael:Celgene: Honoraria. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria.

Phase I Trial of Nanomolecular Liposomal Annamycin in Adult Patients with Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4098-4098
Author(s):  
Meir Wetzler ◽  
Eunice S. Wang ◽  
Robert Shepard ◽  
Deborah A. Thomas ◽  
Michael Andreeff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cardiac Toxicity ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Mdr 1

Abstract Abstract 4098 There continues to be no effective second line therapy for refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adult patients and the cure rate with current therapy has not significantly improved in decades. Annamycin is a highly lipophilic form of the anthracycline doxorubicin with the ability to bypass multi-drug resistance (MDR-1) mechanisms of cellular drug resistance. A novel nanomolecular liposomal entity of annamycin was recently specifically synthesized which overcomes MDR with little to no cardiac toxicity and improved anti-tumor activity when compared to the original annamycin formulation. We performed a phase I multi-center, open-label, study to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of nanomolecular liposomal annamycin in adult patients with refractory ALL. The secondary objective was to study the MDR-1 encoded (permeability glycoprotein) PgP-170 glycoprotein expression in correlation with CD34 expression and MDR-1 mRNA levels in refractory ALL patients prior to and after receiving liposomal annamycin treatment. Thirty patients were enrolled on the study. The MTD was determined to be 150 mg/m2/day for 3 days. Other than the tumor lysis syndrome, there was only 1 severe adverse event (SAE) definitely related to the study drug consisting of grade 3 mucositis. There were also 3 other SAEs of grade 3-4 mucositis probably related to the study drug which comprised the MTD determination. There was no reported cardiac toxicity in any patients. After determining the MTD, a 10-patient phase IIA was conducted. Eight of the patients completed 1 cycle of the 3 days of treatment at the MTD. Of these, 5 (62%) had an efficacy signal with complete clearing of circulating peripheral blasts. Three of these subjects also cleared bone marrow blasts with one subsequently proceeding onto successful stem cell transplantation. The other 2 developed tumor lysis syndrome and unfortunately expired prior to response assessment. Nanomolecular liposomal annamycin appears to be well-tolerated with no cardiotoxicity and evidence of clinical activity as a single agent in refractory adult ALL. Given that the likely mechanism of action is overcoming innate drug resistance via MDR, PgP-170 mRNA and protein expression will be presented. We are currently testing liposomal annamycin in a phase I study in children and young adults with refractory ALL or AML, and planning a phase 2 registration trial in adult ALL Disclosures: Wetzler: Callisto Reserach Funding: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Annamycin. Refractory relapse to ALL. Wang:Callisto : Research Funding. Shepard:Callisto: Research Funding. Thomas:Callisto: Research Funding. Andreeff:Callisto: Research Funding. Kantarjian:Callisto: Research Funding.

A Phase I Study of Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone In Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Excellent Tolerability and Promising Activity In a Heavily Pretreated Population

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1951-1951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Donna Weber ◽  
Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Jean-Luc Harousseau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1951 Background: Although novel treatment combinations for multiple myeloma (MM) have improved outcomes, the disease remains incurable and new drug combinations are urgently needed. Vorinostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor approved in the United States for treatment of patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who failed prior therapies. Vorinostat alters gene expression and protein activity, promoting MM cell death through multiple pathways, and has been shown in preclinical studies to synergistically enhance the anti-MM activity of bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs, including lenalidomide, with or without dexamethasone. Aims: The primary objective of this Phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in pts with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. Secondary objectives included overall safety, tolerability, response rate, duration of response, and time to progression (TTP). Methods: Pts in this Phase I multicenter open-label study were sequentially enrolled into 1 of 5 escalating doses of the combination regimen using a standard 3 + 3 design for ≤8 cycles. Pts who tolerated treatment and experienced clinical benefit were eligible for enrollment in an extension phase. Toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (version 3.0). Response was assessed using the modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria and International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Safety and efficacy data were analyzed using summary statistics, except for TTP, which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: As of July 15, 2010, 31 pts were treated and evaluable for toxicity; 4 pts remain on study. Most pts had received prior thalidomide (n=22; 71%), bortezomib (n=20; 65%), or lenalidomide (n=14; 45%), with a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1–10). The patient population contained both high-risk and low-risk pts, based on cytogenetic and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses. Most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in severity. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, experienced by 19 (61%) pts, were neutropenia (26%), thrombocytopenia (16%), diarrhea (13%), anemia (10%), and fatigue (10%); 8 pts discontinued due to toxicity. One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 diarrhea lasting >48 h) was observed at the maximum assessed dose (level 5), but MTD was not reached (Table) and there were no treatment-related deaths. Among 30 pts evaluable for response, the median TTP was 32 weeks (5 mo), and 4 pts remain on study as of the data cutoff date; 26 of 30 pts (87%) have achieved at least stable disease (SD). Best single responses included 2 complete responses, 3 very good partial responses (VGPR), 11 partial responses (PR), and 5 minimal responses (MR), with 5 pts achieving SD and 4 developing progressive disease, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR; PR or better) of 53%. Of 13 evaluable pts who had previously received lenalidomide, a best single response of SD or better was observed in 9 (69%; 2 VGPR, 3 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD), resulting in a 38% ORR. Notably, SD or better (2 PR, 1 MR, 3 SD) was observed in 60% of 10 evaluable pts who were relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to previous lenalidomide-containing regimens. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this Phase I study suggest that vorinostat plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone is a convenient and generally well-tolerated regimen with promising activity for relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM. The MTD for this combination was not reached. Importantly, responses were observed in pts who had received prior lenalidomide, bortezomib, and thalidomide. Further evaluation of this regimen is planned in future trials. Disclosures: Richardson: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for treatment in Multiple Myeloma. Weber:Novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; Millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; Celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Mitsiades:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck & Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kosan Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmion: Consultancy, Honoraria; Centrocor: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar: Patents & Royalties; OSI Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AVEO Pharma: Research Funding; EMD Serono: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Gloucester Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Dimopoulos:MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harousseau:Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Houp:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Graef:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Gause:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Byrne:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siegel:Celgene and Millennium: Advisory Board, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Advisory Board.

Phase I/II, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of Bendamustine in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (BRD) in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: A Multiple Myeloma Research Consortium Study.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2965-2965
Author(s):  
Shaji K. Kumar ◽  
Amrita Krishnan ◽  
Vivek Roy ◽  
Todd M Zimmerman ◽  
Morie Abraham A Gertz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Expert Testimony ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Dose Reductions

Abstract Abstract 2965 Background: Alkylating agents have been the mainstay of multiple myeloma (MM) therapy for decades and despite introduction of several new therapies, it continues to play a significant role in its management as part of various drug combinations. While melphalan has been the most commonly used alkylator in MM, recent studies have suggested significant activity for bendamustine, a bifunctional alkylator. The combination of lenalidomide and melphalan has been associated with high response rates in relapse and newly diagnosed MM. Based on these promising results we designed a trial to evaluate the maximally tolerated dose of lenalidomide and bendamustine when used in combination as well as the efficacy of the combination in relapsed disease. Patients and Methods: Patients with relapsed MM and measurable disease were enrolled on this phase 1/2 trial provided they had not more than 4 prior lines of therapy for MM, had adequate performance status and organ and hematological function. Patients refractory to lenalidomide were allowed to enroll. The primary objectives were to (i) to determine the MTD of bendamustine and lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone in subjects with relapsed MM (phase 1) and (ii) to evaluate the confirmed response rate of bendamustine in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM (phase 2). Bendamustine (B) was administered on days 1 and 2 of a 28-day cycle at doses of 50–100 mg/m2. Lenalidomide (R) was given days 1–21 at doses of 15–25 mg daily. Dexamethasone (D) was administered at 40 mg weekly. Dose escalation was done using a 3+3 design and MTD was defined as one dose level below that resulted in >=2 DLTS among 6 patients. The primary end point for this trial was the proportion of patients with confirmed hematologic response (sCR, CR, VGPR, or PR) over the first 6 cycles of treatment. Results: A total of 72 patients were accrued to this study from March 2010 to May 2012: 21 patients in phase 1 and 51 in phase 2. The 6 patients from the MTD dose level of phase 1 were also included in phase 2. The median age of all 72 patients was 62.1 (range, 40–86) and 57% were male. Majority (75%) of patients had previously been exposed to lenalidomide and 69% had prior exposure to bortezomib. Median # of prior therapies was 3 (range, 1–5) and 74% of patients had a prior autologous stem cell transplant. Patients have received a median of 4 cycles (range, 1–25), with 27 patients still continuing on active treatment. Disease progression led to study discontinuation in 22 (49%) and adverse events were the reason for discontinuation in 14 (31%). In phase I, two DLTs (Grade (Gr) 2 neuropathy and Gr 4 neutropenia) were seen at the highest dose level (100 mg/m2 B, 25 mg R), and the MTD was determined as 75 mg/m2 of B given days 1 and 2 and 25 mg of R days 1–21, along with D 40 mg weekly. Overall patients, 12/21 (57%) had a PR or better. In phase 2, 17 (40%) confirmed responses (>=PR) were seen among the 43 patients evaluable for response (received at least 6 cycles of treatment or have gone off study prior to 6 cycles); including 9 (21%) VGPR and 8 (19%) PR. An additional 5 patients had a minor response. Over all dose levels, a gr 3 or higher adverse event at least possibly attributed to the study was seen in 75% of patients. The most common toxicities were all hematological (thrombocytopenia and leukopenia), and most common non-hematological toxicity was infection. Prolonged time to recovery of blood counts was seen in a few patients, but majority of patients were able to tolerate the regimen with adequate dose reductions. Conclusion: The recommended dose of the combination for further studies is bendamustine at 75 mg/m2 days 1 and 2, lenalidomide 25 mg daily on days 1–21 and dexamethasone days 1, 8, 15, 22; with cycles repeated every 28 days. The regimen is well tolerated with hematological toxicity being the most common and manageable with dose reductions. The regimen is effective with high response rates and durable responses seen. Updated results with response rates and time to event analyses will be available for the entire cohort at the time of meeting. Disclosures: Kumar: Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Krishnan:celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Zimmerman:Celgene: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria; Novartis: Expert Testimony, Expert Testimony Other. Vij:Teva: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Phase 2 Randomized Trial Comparing 6 Cycles of Standard RCHOP Chemotherapy Vs 6 Cycles of Brcap (bortezomib, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, adriamicine and prednisone) As First Line Treatment in Young Patients with Poor Prognosis Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Interim Analysis

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1514-1514
Author(s):  
Eva González-Barca ◽  
Estrella Carrillo ◽  
Carlos Grande ◽  
Alejandro Martín ◽  
Mónica Coronado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Early Evaluation ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Beta 2 Microglobulin

Abstract Background: survival of young patients with high IPI DLBCL treated with RCHOP chemotherapy needs to be improved. In this poor risk population the combination of RCHOP with new drugs is an attractive approach, along with performing an early evaluation with PET/CT after 2 to 4 cycles and change induction therapy if a complete response is not achieved. Bortezomib has been combined with RCHOP [1]. We present preliminary data of patients treated in a clinical trial comparing 6 cycles of RCHOP vs 6 cycles of BRCAP, a modified RCHOP regimen changing vincristine by bortezomib at a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 sc days 1, 8, and 15 of every 21 days cycle (NCT01848132). Methods: patients younger than 70 yrs diagnosed of DLBCL with aIPI 2-3 or aIPI 1 with elevated beta2microglobulin were eligible. The main objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients who survives free of event at 2 years. Central pathology review was performed in all cases, and samples were classified as GC vs non-GC subtypes by IHC (Hans algorithm). PET/CTs were performed at diagnosis, after 2, 4 and 6 cycles (PET2, PET4 , and PET6), and were reviewed by at least 3 experts of a central panel at real time. Response was analyzed following the visual method with the Deauville scale, and for PET2 and PET4 the semiquantitative method was used. Patients with persistent disease after 4 cycles were considered a failure of therapy and were dropped out from the trial. Results: data from the first 76 patients were analyzed. Diagnosis of DLBCL was confirmed in all except 3 pts, 36 pts were treated in the experimental arm and 37 in the control arm. Median age was 58.2 yo (range 23-70), 37 (50.7%) were males. Characteristics at diagnosis were: non-GC subtype 18/46 (39.1%), C-myc expression 35/43 (81.4%), bcl2 expression 43/49 (87.7%), double expression cmyc/bcl2 30/42 (71%), stage III-IV 64 (87.6%), ≥2 extranodal locations 27 (42.2%), ECOG 2-3 24 (33%), elevated LDH 43 (62.3%), elevated beta 2 microglobulin 47 (75.8%), aIPI 2: 42 (57.5%), aIPI 3: 21 (28.8%). Among 160 cycles of BRCAP chemotherapy, 5 (3.1%) on day 8, and 22 (13.7%) on day 15, were given without bortezomib due to a neutrophil count below 0.5 /L. The most common toxicities are shown in table 1 without significant differences between both arms. Twenty-one (32.8%) out of 64 patients had a positive PET2. Fifteen (26.8%) out of 56 patients who have finished the 4 cycles had a positive PET4 according to central review and were withdrawn of the trial. Table 1. Episodes of treatment-related adverse events Control arm: RCHOP n=166 Experimental arm: BRCAP n=160 Any grade Grade 3-4 Any grade Grade 3-4 Anemia 6 0 22 9 ( 5.6%) Neutropenia 31 26 (15.6%) 47 37 (23.1%) Thrombocytopenia 9 4 ( 2.4%) 16 5 ( 3.1%) Febrile neutropenia - 6 ( 3.6%) - 10 ( 6.2%) Fever 8 1 ( 0.6%) 8 0 Infection 4 1 ( 0.6%) 7 1 ( 0.6%) Nausea/vomiting 12 0 19 0 Peripheral neuropathy 7 1 ( 0.6%) 7 1 ( 0.6%) Diarrhea 4 0 8 0 Constipation 7 0 4 0 Hepatotoxicity 6 0 6 0 Conclusions: BRCAP regimen with bortezomib sc d1, 8, and 15 is feasible. Its main toxicity is hematological, and some patients cannot receive some doses of bortezomib due to neutropenia. Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity is rare, including peripheral neuropathy, and do not differ from RCHOP toxicity. 1.Ruan J et al, JCO 2011;29:690-7 Disclosures Sancho: CELLTRION, Inc.: Research Funding. Lopez-Guillermo:Roche, Celgene, Mundipharma, Gilead, Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals A Phase I Trial of Ibrutinib Plus Palbociclib in Patients with Previously Treated Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 150-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Martin ◽  
Kristie Blum ◽  
Nancy L. Bartlett ◽  
Steven I. Park ◽  
Kami J. Maddocks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background Single-agent ibrutinib confers a response rate of 77%, including a complete response (CR) rate of 19% in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.6 months and 1-year response duration (RD) rate of 69%, nearly half of all patients experience treatment failure during the first year. We previously demonstrated that prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest induced by the oral, specific CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib can overcome ibrutinib resistance in primary human samples and MCL cell lines with wild-type BTK (Chiron et al. Cancer Discovery 2014). We conducted a phase I trial to evaluate the safety and preliminary activity of palbociclib plus ibrutinib in patients with previously treated mantle cell lymphoma. Methods Adult patients who were ibrutinib and CDK4/6 inhibitor-naïve who had previously treated MCL were eligible to participate. The primary objective was to estimate the maximum tolerated dose of the combination. Consenting patients were enrolled to one of five dose levels, shown in Table 1. Patients were treated in 28 day cycles, with ibrutinib administered daily and palbociclib administered on days 1-21. (Table 1). Patients could continue to receive study treatment until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Doses were escalated according to a standard phase I 3+3 design. Patients were evaluated for efficacy at the end of cycles 3 and 6, and every 6 cycles thereafter. All CRs, as documented by CT, required confirmation by PET/CT; bone marrow biopsy and endoscopy were also required in patients with known marrow or GI tract involvement, respectively. Additional objectives included pharmacokinetics and evaluation of pretreatment samples for biomarkers of response or resistance. Results From August 2014 to June 2016 a total of 20 patients (15 males, 5 females) were enrolled (DL1 n=3, DL2 n=3, DL3 n=6, DL4 n=3, DL5 n=5). The patients' MIPI risk distribution were 7 low, 7 intermediate, and 6 high. The median number of prior therapies was 1 (range 1-5). Six patients were refractory to their last prior therapy. Three patients experienced dose limiting toxicity: One patient treated at DL3 experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting more than 7 days, and grade 3 rash was seen in two patients at DL5. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity included thrombocytopenia (28%), neutropenia (22%), and lymphopenia (17%). Grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity regardless of attribution included one patient with each of the following: lung infection, ALT/AST increase, encephalitis, hyponatremia, sinus tachycardia, pneumonitis. Grade 1-2 adverse events related to treatment and occurring in at least 2 patients included the following: diarrhea (50%), fatigue (44%), rash (39%), bruising (17%), nausea (17%), fever (11%), dyspepsia (11%), and myalgia (11%). Other than the two patients that experienced grade 3 rash at DL5, no patients have required dose reductions; 6 patients required dose interruptions. Thirteen subjects continue on study therapy. The reasons for stopping treatment were disease progression (n=4), adverse event (elevated liver enzymes, n=1; and prolonged cytopenias, n=1), and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (n=1). Of the 18 patients that have had at least one response evaluation to date, 12 (67%) patients responded to treatment and 8 (44%) achieved a CR. The median time to CR was 3 cycles and no responding patients have progressed on study. With a median follow up of 11 months, the estimated 1-year PFS and RD are 68% and 100%, respectively (Figure 1). Conclusions The mechanism-based combination of ibrutinib plus palbociclib is well tolerated and active. Toxicity is primarily related to myelosuppression of grade 1-2 severity, although grade 3 rash was observed at the highest doses evaluated. In this small group of patients, the combination produced responses at all dose levels, with a CR rate of 44% and a median time to CR of 3 months. No responding patients have progressed to date. These preliminary CR, PFS, and RD rates appear better than those reported in other studies of single-agent ibrutinib although the numbers of patients was very small. A phase II multi-center clinical trial to evaluate time to progression is planned. Biomarker studies to evaluate mechanisms of primary resistance are ongoing. Disclosures Martin: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Novartis: Consultancy; Acerta: Consultancy; Teva: Research Funding. Ruan:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding.

An Open-Label Phase I Study of the Safety and Efficacy of RAD001 in Combination with Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3856-3856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noopur Raje ◽  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Parameswaran N Hari ◽  
Anuj Mahindra ◽  
Sarah Kaster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Oral Steroid ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3856 Poster Board III-792 Background Lenalidomide (Revlimid®, Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients following ≥1 prior therapy. mTOR inhibitor RAD001 has been studied as a single agent in MM, and although well tolerated, did not have single agent activity. Given the increased toxicity noted with pulsed high dose steroids, we sought to study a non-steroid containing oral regimen for the treatment of relapsed MM predicated upon our previous studies which demonstrated synergistic anti-MM activity of mTOR inhibitors when combined with len. Here, we extended our in vitro observations to a phase I clinical trial combining RAD001 with len in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The primary objective was to assess toxicity of this combination and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary objective was to determine the activity of this combination. Methods Patients with relapsed and refractory MM were assigned to len and RAD001 to be taken for 21 days of a 28 day cycle. Dose escalation followed a modified Fibonacci design. Patients were allowed to continue therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients received concomitant anti-thrombotic (aspirin 81 or 325 mg/day) therapy. Response was assessed according to modified EBMT and Uniform Criteria, and toxicities were assessed using NCI CTCAE v3.0. Results Eighteen MM patients have been enrolled to date. One patient in cohort 1 (Len: 10mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days) developed grade 3 neutropenia requiring expansion of the cohort. Cohort 2 (Len: 15mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days) also required expansion because of grade 4 thrombocytopenia noted in 1 patient. Dose limiting toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 2/3 patients in cohort 3 (Len: 20mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days). The MTD for patients with MM was therefore declared at 15 mg of len and 5mg of RAD001 for 21 days with a 7 day rest period. Apart from the hematological toxicities expected with the combination, patients otherwise tolerated the regimen well. Most common (≥10%) grade 1 / 2 events included nausea, fatigue, dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, neuropathy and muscle cramps, all of which were manageable with supportive care. No thromboembolic events were noted. Grade 3 / 4 adverse events ≥ 5% included thrombocytopenia (11%) and neutropenia (22%). Fifteen patients have finished at least 2 cycles of therapy: 8 of 15 patients have either stable disease (SD: 1), minimal response (MR: 5) or a partial response (PR: 2), including 7 of 9 patients treated at the recommended MTD for an overall response rate (MR or better) of 50% (90% CI: [30.76%]). One patient with SD continued therapy for a total of 10 cycles, without significant toxicities. Conclusions The combination of Len plus RAD001 is a well tolerated regimen with predictable hematological toxicities. Promising responses were noted in this heavily pretreated patient population. This combination provides an oral steroid free combination alternative strategy which warrants future evaluation in phase II studies. Disclosures: Raje: Astrazeneca : Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: RAD001 not labelled for use in myeloma. Richardson:Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hari:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Laubach:Novartis:. Ghobrial:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Adams:Novartis: Employment. Makrides:Celgene: Employment.

Phase I/II Study with Single Agent Everolimus (RAD001) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3850-3850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Guenther ◽  
Philipp Baumann ◽  
Renate Burger ◽  
Wolfram Klapper ◽  
Ralf Schmidmaier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Bone Marrow Biopsies ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3850 Poster Board III-786 Introduction The mammalian target of rapamycin (mToR) plays an important role in multiple myeloma (MM), since it is involved in the PI3K-AKT pathway which can be activated by stimulation with growth and survival factors such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) or the loss of the tumor suppressor PTEN. Inhibition of mToR blocked myeloma cell growth in vitro as well as in preclinical animal models. The mToR inhibitor everolimus (RAD001) is approved for immunosuppression and for the treatment of renal cell cancer. In an investigator-initiated phase I/II open label trial, patients ≥ 18 years with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) were included after at least two lines of previous treatment. The patients received a fixed dose of oral everolimus for six months. The cohorts had 3 to 6 participants. The phase I part of the trial followed a classical dose-escalation design with three planned dose levels (5 mg, 7.5 mg and 10 mg). Patient benefiting from study drug were allowed to continue with treatment. To obtain insights into the biological activity of everolimus, serum dose levels were monitored and bone marrow biopsies and aspirates were performed three times (at screening, after four weeks and after six months of treatment). Results The primary endpoint of the phase I part was safety. Currently, 12 patients were screened and 11 enrolled in the trial (10 male and 1 female, age from 52 to 71 years). One patient withdrew his consent in the first four weeks of treatment and had to be replaced for safety and efficacy assessment. Since no DLT were observed, the intended final daily dose of 10 mg everolimus could be reached. Only one of four SAE during treatment was assessed to be possibly related to the study drug. Except for one grade 4 thrombocytopenia, no > grade 3 AE were observed during treatment. Remarkably, few infectious complications (≤grade 2) were seen despite the known immunosuppressive activity of everolimus. Anti-myeloma activity was documented in 5 out of 7 evaluable patients. One partial response in a heavily pre-treated patient and stable disease in four additional patients were seen. The observed rate of responses and clinical benefit fulfills the criteria defined in the protocol to enter the phase II part of the trial after completing phase I. The individual serum dose levels varied widely and response seemed to correlate to the achieved everolimus dose level. Conclusion Everolimus given orally at doses of 5 mg to 10 mg daily showed an acceptable safety profile in heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma patients and the observed responses even at suboptimal dose levels are promising. Further evaluation of everolimus, alone and in combination with other drugs, is warranted. Disclosures: Guenther: Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Everolimus is not approved for multiple myeloma. Baumann:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schmidmaier:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gramatzki:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Combined Bendamustine, Prednisolone and Lenalidomide (RBP) In Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma. First Results of a Phase I Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1971-1971
Author(s):  
Wolfram Pönisch ◽  
Simone Heyn ◽  
Ina Wagner ◽  
Martin Mohren ◽  
Franz-Albert Hoffmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Maximum Tolerable Dose ◽  
Starting Dose ◽  
First Results ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tolerable Dose

Abstract Abstract 1971 Introduction: While the role of lenalidomide monotherapy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is established, combination therapies with Lenalinomide are still under investigation. Bendamustine is a bi-functional alkylating agent with a purine-like benzimidazole ring effective in combination with steroids, thalidomide and bortezomib for the treatment of patients with MM. In the current trial, combination therapy of bendamustine, lenalinomide and prednisolone (RBP) was tested for feasibility and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Patients and Methods: This is a phase I trial examining dosing of lenalidomide in combination with bendamustine and prednisolone. The first cohort of patients received a starting dose of 10mg/d d1-21 lenalidomide, 60mg/m2/d d1-2 bendamustine and 100mg/d d1-4 prednisolone. Escalation steps in the next cohorts included 15, 20 and 25mg of lenalidomide followed by an escalation step of 75 mg/m2 bendamustine. Three patients were enrolled at each dose level and the first two cycles were evaluated for maximum tolerable dose. Patients received RBP in 4-week cycles for a maximum of 8 cycles in order to evaluate efficacy. Patients with stable or responding disease following 8 cycles of RBP received single-agent oral lenalidomide 10 mg once daily on days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle as maintenance. Results: : Nine patients (3 at each dose level of 10 mg, 15 mg or 20 mg lenalidomide) have been enrolled to date and 9 patients have completed at least 2 cycles. Response was assessed using modified EBMT criteria to include near complete remission (nCR) and very good partial remission (VGPR). 8 of 9 patients responded after at least 2 cycles with 2 VGPR, 4 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease. One patient experienced progressive disease. None of the 9 patients developed dose-limiting hematoxicity as defined by an ANC < 1,0 × 109/l with fever for > 3 days or an ANC <0,5 × 109/l for > 7 days or platelet count < 25 × 109/l for > 3 days. Neutropenia was reported in 4 patients (CTC grade ≥ 3) but no thrombocytopenia (CTC grade ≥ 3) was observed. No grade 3 or 4 non hematological toxicity was encountered and no dose modification was required. Conclusions: RBP with a dose of 20 mg lenalidomide d 1–21 and 60 mg/m2 bendamustine d 1–2 is well tolerated in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Maximum tolerable dose was not reached. Further dose increase according to the protocol is in progress. Disclosures: Niederwieser: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau.

An Open-Label Phase 1/2 Trial of Bendamustine Combined with Bortezomib for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3057-3057
Author(s):  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Ori Yellin ◽  
Alberto Bessudo ◽  
Ralph Boccia ◽  
Donald S. Gravenor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Therapeutic Options ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3057 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an aggressive and incurable disorder with an eventual fatal outcome bringing urgency to the identification of effective treatments for patients who have exhausted standard chemotherapy. New agents, such as lenalidomide and bortezomib have led to a rapid increase in therapeutic options as single agents and in combination with other agents. However, despite this progress nearly all patients will relapse and require additional therapeutic options. Bendamustine is a unique chemotherapeutic agent that combines an alkylating group with a purine-like benzimidazole ring that is approved in the US for the treatment of CLL and refractory indolent B-cell NHL. Bendamustine is approved in Europe for the treatment of MM. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor (PI) that is approved for the treatment of MM and the combination of this PI with alkylating agents including melphalan and cyclophosphamide has proven highly effective in the treatment of MM. Thus, the combination of bortezomib with bendamustine which also possesses alkylating agent properties may enable patients that were previously treated with bortezomib to have additional therapeutic options. In addition, this combination may allow use of lower doses of bortezomib to be used potentially reducing the incidence of peripheral neuropathy as has been observed in other combinations involving bortezomib with other alkylating agents. This study is being conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of bendamustine in combination with bortezomib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM. Methods: This open-label, Phase 1/2 study, will enroll up to 40 patients (pts), age ≥18 years, with measurable MM that has relapsed following or is refractory to at least 1 previous treatment. Patients received bendamustine infused intravenously over 1 hour on days 1 & 4 in 3-dose cohorts of 50, 70, or 90 mg/m2 and bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8, & 11 at a fixed dose of 1.0 mg/m2 for up to eight 28-day cycles. Three pts were initially enrolled at each dose cohort. Up to 5 pts were allowed to enroll in each initial cohort if they were all in screening prior to the 3rd pt being enrolled. After the first 3 pts completed cycle 1 of each dose, the cohort was assessed for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). In this study, a DLT was defined as any study drug related grade 3 or grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity, grade 4 hematologic toxicity, grade 3 thrombocytopenia with grade 3 or 4 hemorrhage, grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 or grade 4 nausea and vomiting refractory to anti-emetic therapy, or any drug-related deaths. A standard 3+3 approach was used for determining the MTD. The MTD cohort will be expanded so that up to 40 total pts are enrolled. Results: Twenty-five pts with a median age of 62 (44-91) have been enrolled on the study and received at least 1 dose of study drug, and 52% of the pts are male. Patients had received a median of 4 (1-17) prior therapies. Notably, 80% (20/25) of pts had received at least one prior bortezomib-containing regimen. For the Phase 1 portion, 5 pts were enrolled into the 50 mg/m2 cohort, 4 pts were enrolled into the 70 mg/m2 cohort and 5 pts were enrolled into the 90 mg/m2 cohort. No DLTs were observed in the phase 1 portion of the study. The maximum dose (90 mg/m2) was well tolerated. Patients are currently enrolling into the Phase 2 portion of the study and receiving this dose of bendamustine in the combination treatment. To date, the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events, occurring in more than 10% of pts, were neutropenia (36%), anemia, (24%), thrombocytopenia (24%), and renal failure (12%). A worsening of baseline peripheral neuropathy was reported in 20% of pts. Two (8%) pts were reported to have grade 1, treatment emergent peripheral neuropathy. To date, nearly one-third (8/25) of pts have achieved an MR or PR. To date, 16 pts have been enrolled at the 90 mg/m2 dose of bendamustine and 5 (31%) have achieved an MR or PR. Conclusions: The combination of bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on days 1 and 4 and bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, & 11 appears to be safe and effective in this heavily pre-treated patient population. The phase 2 portion of this study is ongoing. Disclosures: Berenson: Cephalon: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is approved for CLL and refractory NHL. It is being studied in combiantion with bortezomib for multiple myeloma. Siegel:Cephalon: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Marmatech: Research Funding; Medivation: Research Funding; Caremark/CVS: Consultancy. Swift:Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Ehrman:Cephalon Inc.: Employment. Bensen-Kennedy:Cephalon Inc.: Employment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document