An Open-Label Phase 1/2 Trial of Bendamustine Combined with Bortezomib for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Abstract 3057 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is an aggressive and incurable disorder with an eventual fatal outcome bringing urgency to the identification of effective treatments for patients who have exhausted standard chemotherapy. New agents, such as lenalidomide and bortezomib have led to a rapid increase in therapeutic options as single agents and in combination with other agents. However, despite this progress nearly all patients will relapse and require additional therapeutic options. Bendamustine is a unique chemotherapeutic agent that combines an alkylating group with a purine-like benzimidazole ring that is approved in the US for the treatment of CLL and refractory indolent B-cell NHL. Bendamustine is approved in Europe for the treatment of MM. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor (PI) that is approved for the treatment of MM and the combination of this PI with alkylating agents including melphalan and cyclophosphamide has proven highly effective in the treatment of MM. Thus, the combination of bortezomib with bendamustine which also possesses alkylating agent properties may enable patients that were previously treated with bortezomib to have additional therapeutic options. In addition, this combination may allow use of lower doses of bortezomib to be used potentially reducing the incidence of peripheral neuropathy as has been observed in other combinations involving bortezomib with other alkylating agents. This study is being conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of bendamustine in combination with bortezomib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM. Methods: This open-label, Phase 1/2 study, will enroll up to 40 patients (pts), age ≥18 years, with measurable MM that has relapsed following or is refractory to at least 1 previous treatment. Patients received bendamustine infused intravenously over 1 hour on days 1 & 4 in 3-dose cohorts of 50, 70, or 90 mg/m2 and bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8, & 11 at a fixed dose of 1.0 mg/m2 for up to eight 28-day cycles. Three pts were initially enrolled at each dose cohort. Up to 5 pts were allowed to enroll in each initial cohort if they were all in screening prior to the 3rd pt being enrolled. After the first 3 pts completed cycle 1 of each dose, the cohort was assessed for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). In this study, a DLT was defined as any study drug related grade 3 or grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity, grade 4 hematologic toxicity, grade 3 thrombocytopenia with grade 3 or 4 hemorrhage, grade 3 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 or grade 4 nausea and vomiting refractory to anti-emetic therapy, or any drug-related deaths. A standard 3+3 approach was used for determining the MTD. The MTD cohort will be expanded so that up to 40 total pts are enrolled. Results: Twenty-five pts with a median age of 62 (44-91) have been enrolled on the study and received at least 1 dose of study drug, and 52% of the pts are male. Patients had received a median of 4 (1-17) prior therapies. Notably, 80% (20/25) of pts had received at least one prior bortezomib-containing regimen. For the Phase 1 portion, 5 pts were enrolled into the 50 mg/m2 cohort, 4 pts were enrolled into the 70 mg/m2 cohort and 5 pts were enrolled into the 90 mg/m2 cohort. No DLTs were observed in the phase 1 portion of the study. The maximum dose (90 mg/m2) was well tolerated. Patients are currently enrolling into the Phase 2 portion of the study and receiving this dose of bendamustine in the combination treatment. To date, the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events, occurring in more than 10% of pts, were neutropenia (36%), anemia, (24%), thrombocytopenia (24%), and renal failure (12%). A worsening of baseline peripheral neuropathy was reported in 20% of pts. Two (8%) pts were reported to have grade 1, treatment emergent peripheral neuropathy. To date, nearly one-third (8/25) of pts have achieved an MR or PR. To date, 16 pts have been enrolled at the 90 mg/m2 dose of bendamustine and 5 (31%) have achieved an MR or PR. Conclusions: The combination of bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on days 1 and 4 and bortezomib 1.0 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, & 11 appears to be safe and effective in this heavily pre-treated patient population. The phase 2 portion of this study is ongoing. Disclosures: Berenson: Cephalon: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is approved for CLL and refractory NHL. It is being studied in combiantion with bortezomib for multiple myeloma. Siegel:Cephalon: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Marmatech: Research Funding; Medivation: Research Funding; Caremark/CVS: Consultancy. Swift:Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Ehrman:Cephalon Inc.: Employment. Bensen-Kennedy:Cephalon Inc.: Employment.

Download Full-text

Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RVD) In Combination with Vorinostat as Front-Line Therapy for Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM): Initial Results of a Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.3034.3034 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 3034-3034 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽

Jatin J Shah ◽

Jacob P. Laubach ◽

Leonard Heffner ◽

Dixil Francis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Patient Choice ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Upfront Therapy ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3034 Background: The combination of lenalidomide (R), bortezomib (V), and dexamethasone (D) (RVD) in newly diagnosed MM patients is well tolerated and associated with a very high overall response rate. The goal of the current trial is to improve on the CR rate compared with RVD by adding a novel targeted agent. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that vorinostat (Vor), an HDAC inhibitor, is synergistic with bortezomib, immunomodulatory (IMiD®) compounds and dexamethasone. Clinical studies in the relapsed setting using either bortezomib or lenalidomide with vorinostat have yielded promising results with manageable toxicity. The aim of this study is to determine the tolerability and preliminary efficacy of the combination of RVD with vorinostat in newly diagnosed patients with symptomatic MM. Methods: Patients (Pts) received the current standard RVD regimen (lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–14, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11 and dexamethasone 20/10 mg PO [cycles 1–4/5-8] days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 for up to 8 21 day cycles) combined with oral vorinostat (Vor), provided by Merck and Co. Inc., at 100, 200, 300 or 400 mg daily days 1 – 14 of each cycle. Pts were assigned to one of the four dosing cohorts according to the Bayesian Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) algorithm. DLT (≥ G3 non hematologic toxicity, G4 hematologic toxicities defined as G4 thrombocytopenia of any duration; failure of recovery of ANC to ≥1,000/μL or platelets to ≥50,000/μL within 14 days of the last treatment; or inability to receive Day 1 dose for Cycle 2 due to continued drug-related toxicity from cycle 1) was determined in the first cycle of therapy. Toxicities were assessed and graded for all cycles using the NCI CTCAE v 3.0. Responses were assessed by modified EBMT and Uniform criteria. Pts with PR or better could proceed to autologous transplant after ≥ 4 cycles. Results: Eleven pts (median age 54, 82% men, 54.5% ISS Stage II/III) have been enrolled to date with n=4 pts each in cohorts 1 (Vor 100mg) and 2 (Vor 200mg), and 3 pts in cohort 3 (Vor 300 mg). One patient has completed 8 cycles, 1 pt completed 4 cycles and proceeded to transplant, 6 pts remain on study treatment and 3 pts have discontinued therapy (1 for significant peripheral neuropathy {grade 3}, 1 for patient choice unrelated to toxicity and 1 for non adherence). Two DLTs have occurred: syncope (cohort 1) and asymptomatic grade 3 elevation of ALT (cohort 2) with none in cohort 3.The episode of syncope was not related to cardiac arrhythmia. One study related SAE has occurred (syncope). One other episode of grade 3 elevation of ALT occurred in a pt in cycle 3 in cohort 1. Both episodes of increased ALT resolved and patients remained on study with dose modification. One patient developed grade 3 diarrhea in cohort 1. No patients have developed a grade 4 toxicity. Treatment emergent peripheral neuropathy occurred in 6 patients (4 grade 1, 1 grade 2 and 1 grade 3). No episodes of study related grade 3 fatigue, nausea, or vomiting have occurred. The MTD has not been reached. Eight patients are evaluable for response. All have responded to study therapy with 3 CRs, 1 VGPR and 4 PRs. Three patients went on to stem cell collection after 4 cycles and all collected an adequate dose for transplant of >5 ×106 CD34+ cells/kg. Conclusion: The combination of RVD with vorinostat has been generally well tolerated to date. No unexpected toxicity has been noted with side effects commensurate with prior experience with each of the drugs and no additive toxicity seen to date. While asymptomatic elevation of ALT has been seen and will require ongoing monitoring, grade 3 ALT elevation was a DLT in the original RVD study and related to dexamethasone, so may not be related to the addition of vorinostat. Early efficacy data is promising with 50% of patients achieving a VGPR or higher. Accrual is ongoing to determine the MTD. Disclosures: Kaufman: Celgene, Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene, Merck: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Use of lenalidomide as upfront therapy. Use of vorinostat as upfront therapy. Shah:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Heffner:Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Orlowski:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Combination Chemotherapy with Carfilzomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone Is Highly Active for Therapy of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma-Results of Single Center Phase I/II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130207 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3196-3196

Author(s):

Divaya Bhutani ◽

Siyang Leng ◽

Samuel Pan ◽

Amer Assal ◽

Alexander Wei ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Highly Effective ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Levels

Background: Carfilzomib and Bendamustine are currently FDA approved for therapy of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Bendamustine, in addition to interference with DNA replication, it can induce inhibition of mitotic checkpoints, inefficient DNA repair, and initiation of a p53-dependent DNA-damaging stress response leading to apoptosis of tumor cells (1). It has previously shown significant activity in relapsed myeloma (2). Carfilzomib is a second generation, irreversible proteasome inhibitor has demonstrated promising activity in first line therapy (3,4). we hypothesized that combining them will yield an effective induction regimen in the newly diagnosed MM. Study design: Inclusion criteria included newly diagnosed MM with measurable disease, age ≥18, ECOG PS 0-2, adequate renal (creatinine clearance >30 mL/min), cardiac and hepatic function. Carfilzomib was given IV on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16. All patients received 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1, after which their dose was escalated to one of the following levels: 27, 36, 45, or 56 mg/m2. Bendamustine IVPB on days 1, 2, at 70 (dose levels 1 and 2) or 90 mg/m2 (dose levels 3-5). Dexamethasone 20 mg PO or IV D 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, 23. Each cycle of therapy was 28 days, and a total of 8 cycles was given. Stem cell harvest was done after 4 cycles and eligible patients proceeded to ASCT after 8 cycles. Maintenance was recommended - either carfilzomib (36mg/m2 D 1,2, 15, 16 of a 28-day cycle for 2 years, or investigator's choice. Primary objective was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and additional objectives assessed efficacy and safety. Results: Between February 2014 and May 2018, 20 patients with newly diagnosed MM pts were accrued onto study (5 pts in phase I and 15 in phase II). Median age was 65 (range 48-74), and 14 (70%) patients were male. 7 (35%) were of Hispanic ethnicity. 3 patients (15%) were R-ISS stage 3, and 1 (5%) had high-risk cytogenetics. We did not observe any DLTs with our study treatment and established the RP2D as: carfilzomib 56 mg/m2, bendamustine 90 mg/m2 and dexamethasone 20 mg on the dosing schedule given above. The most common and severe toxicities were hematologic. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were lymphocytopenia in 90% of patients, neutropenia 40%, anemia 20% and thrombocytopenia 20%. Notable non-hematologic toxicities were grade 3/4 infection in 20% of patients (typically upper respiratory and pneumonia), grade 1/2 acute kidney injury in 45% of patients, and grade 1/2 diarrhea in 40% of patients. No treatment emergent hypertension or heart failure were noted. 1 patient died while on study, from septic shock due to pneumonia 7 weeks after completion of induction. The regimen was highly effective, with an ORR of 100%. Best responses were: 2 (11%) PR, 5 VGPR (26%), and 12 CR (63%) (Figure 2). Among the CRs, 4 were MRD-positive, 5 were MRD-negative, and 3 did not have MRD testing. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 11-71), 2 patients have progressed - 1 with del(17p) at 19 months after diagnosis, and the other with standard cytogenetic risk disease at 56 months. 2 patients have died - the patient with del(17p) from refractory myeloma at 37 months after diagnosis, and the other from septic shock as discussed above. Median PFS was 56 months, and median OS has not been reached. Conclusion: Carfilzomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone is safe and highly effective for newly diagnosed transplant eligible MM and should be further explored in a larger prospective trial for this patient population. References: 1. Leoni LM, Hartley JA. Mechanism of action: the unique pattern of bendamustine-induced cytotoxicity. Seminars in hematology 2011;48 Suppl 1:S12-23. 2. Lentzsch S, O'Sullivan A, Kennedy RC, et al. Combination of bendamustine, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (BLD) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma is feasible and highly effective: results of phase 1/2 open-label, dose escalation study. Blood 2012;119:4608-13. 3. Dimopoulos MA, Goldschmidt H, Niesvizky R, et al. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2017;18:1327-37. 4. Jakubowiak AJ, Dytfeld D, Griffith KA, et al. A phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone as a frontline treatment for multiple myeloma. Blood 2012;120:1801-9. Disclosures Bhutani: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Assal:Incyte corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; boston biomedical: Consultancy. Lentzsch:Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Proclara: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Honoraria; International Myeloma Foundation: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Columbia University: Patents & Royalties: 11-1F4mAb as anti-amyloid strategy; Caelum Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Carfilzomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Download Full-text

Carfilzomib Thalidomide and Dexamethasone Is Safe and Effective in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: An Open Label Phase II Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) MM 018/ Asian Myeloma Network (AMN) 002 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139174 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 39-40

Author(s):

Hang Quach ◽

Simon J Harrison ◽

Je-Jung Lee ◽

Nichloas Murphy ◽

Jae Hoon Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Primary Endpoint ◽

Research Funding ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Open Label Phase ◽

Grade 3

Background: The combination of carfilzomib with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and dexamethasone is active in multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (KTd) has been studied in upfront MM treatment but has not been studied in the setting of relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM). The ALLG MM018/ AMN002 is an open-label phase II study of KTd in patients with RRMM. This study was conducted across 16 sites across Australia, New-Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Method: Patients with RRMM with 1-3 prior lines of treatment were given carfilzomib [K: 20mg/m2 IV cycle 1 days 1 and 2, 56mg/m2 (36mg/m2 for patients age ≥75 years) from cycle 1 day 8 onwards], thalidomide (T: 100mg po nocte) and dexamethasone [dex: 40mg (20mg for patients age ≥75 years) po weekly], in a 28-day cycle. After 12 cycles, T was omitted, and K was given on days 1,2,15,16 and dex days 1,15 every 28-day cycles for a further six cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were ORR, overall survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL). The study had an 80% power to detect a ≥70% PFS at 6.5 months compared to historical ≤50% PFS at 6.5 months expected with Td (Kropff, M. et al. Haematologica 2012), at a significance level of 0.05. Results: This study has completed accrual. Eighty-three patients [median age of 66 years (42-85)] were enrolled with a median follow up of 15.9 (0.9-26) months. ORR rates were 86.4% (≥VGPR 70.2%). Median PFS was 20m (95% CI 15.9-26m). PFS at 6.5 months was 76.2% (95% CI 73.6-84.9%). Median OS has not been reached, and was 75% at 20 months. The most common grade ≥3/4 AEs were peripheral neuropathy (16%), upper respiratory tract infections (12%), dyspnoea (14%), and hypertension (10%). Grade ≥3/4 cardiac AEs occurred in 6%. The median carfilzomib dose that was delivered was 70.7% (32.8-92.6%) of the target dose. Thus far, 41% of patients have completed the intended 18 cycles of treatment. 21% of patients ceased therapy early. The most common reason for early treatment cessation was disease progression (30%) and adverse events (15%). Fifteen patients (18%) have died, 11 were due to MM, two from infection, one from an ischaemic cardiac event, and one from a traffic accident. QoL, as measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument, remained stable throughout treatment. Conclusion: The ALLG MM018/AMN 002 study has met its primary endpoint. The KTd schedule as outlined in this study is efficacious in patients with RRMM, resulting in a prolonged PFS and a safety profile in line with previous reports for each of carfilzomib and thalidomide. KTd is an active option in jurisdictions where the cost of other IMiDs prohibits regulatory funding. Comparisons of efficacy and adverse events between the Caucasian and Asian populations will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Quach: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Kline Smith: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Harrison:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: wrt panobinostat; Haemalogix: Consultancy. Augustson:Roche: Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Campbell:Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Janssen, Celgene (BMS): Research Funding; AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche, Amgen, CSL Behring, Novartis: Consultancy. Soo:Hanmi: Research Funding. Durie:Amgen, Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, and Takeda: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

ARRY-520 Shows Durable Responses in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in a Phase 1 Dose-Escalation Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.1860.1860 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 1860-1860 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Jatin J Shah ◽

Jeffrey Zonder ◽

Adam Cohen ◽

Robert Z. Orlowski ◽

Raymond Alexanian ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Febrile Neutropenia ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Acceptable Safety Profile ◽

Heavily Pretreated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1860 Background: ARRY-520 is a potent, selective inhibitor of kinesin spindle protein (KSP, eg5) which is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Treatment with ARRY-520 arrests cells in mitosis with subsequent induction of apoptosis due to degradation of survival signals during mitotic arrest. Cancers, such as multiple myeloma (MM), that depend on the short-lived survival protein Myeloid cell leukemia (MCL)-1 are highly sensitive to treatment with ARRY-520 in preclinical MM models, providing a strong rationale for its clinical investigation in this disease. Methods: This Phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), preliminary efficacy and biological activity of ARRY-520 administered intravenously on Days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks without/with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Eligible patients (pts) had relapsed or refractory MM with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy (including both bortezomib [BTZ] and an immunomodulatory [IMiD] agent), unless refusing or ineligible for this therapy. Cohorts were enrolled in a classical 3+3 dose escalation design. Results: Enrollment in this Phase 1 study is complete. Thirty-one pts have been treated, with a median age of 60 years (range 43–79) and a median of 6 prior regimens (range 2–16). All pts received a prior proteasome inhibitor (30 pts BTZ, 4 pts carfilzomib) and an IMiD-based agent (28 pts lenalidomide, 23 pts thalidomide). Twenty-four pts had an autologous stem cell transplant. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 1.25 mg/m2/day without G-CSF. As neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), dose escalation with G-CSF support was conducted and the MTD for ARRY-520 with G-CSF was determined to be 1.5 mg/m2/day. At the MTD, 1 of 7 pts had a DLT of febrile neutropenia. At doses above the MTD, additional DLTs of Grade 3 mucositis and Grade 3 corneal disorder were observed. ARRY-520 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included hematologic events (anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia), as well as anorexia, blurred vision, diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, febrile neutropenia, mucositis, nausea and rash. No treatment-related AEs of neuropathy or alopecia were reported at the MTD. ARRY-520 has been dosed over extended periods of time (to date, median 7 cycles [range 1–44]), with no evidence of cumulative toxicity. The plasma concentrations of ARRY-520 were determined over a 7-day period during Cycle 1 following the Day 1 and 2 infusions of ARRY-520. The preliminary noncompartmental PK parameter estimates in this population were similar to those observed in prior oncology studies. The PK was characterized by low clearance (CL = 2.2 L/hr/m2) and a large volume of distribution (Vss = 232 L/m2). The t1/2 of elimination was very long (67 hrs). Concentrations were typically maintained above the in vitro IC50 for KSP inhibition for ≥ 7 days suggesting therapeutically active concentrations of drug were maintained in pts for sustained periods. Further analyses of PK relative to safety and activity are on-going. ARRY-520 showed activity as a single agent across a range of doses in this heavily pretreated population (31 evaluable pts) with 3 confirmed partial responses (PR) and 1 confirmed minimal response (MR) per International Melanoma Working Group (IMWG) and European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EMBT) criteria. PRs had a median of 7 prior therapies (range 2–8). Responses were durable; to date, the durations of responses for PRs were 3.4+ months (mos), 11.9+ mos and 12.0 mos, respectively. Of interest, the time to response with ARRY-520 was prolonged, with a median time to PR of 3.7 mos (range 3.7–8.1). Notably, responses were observed in pts refractory to multiple standard-of-care agents. In addition, 4 pts experienced a best response of stable disease (SD) lasting ≥ 10 mos. To date, 5 pts remain on study, including 2 of 3 PRs. Conclusions: In this Phase 1 study, ARRY-520 shows promising evidence of clinical activity, with a long duration of response and an acceptable safety profile in heavily pretreated MM Patients. A Phase 2 portion of the study is ongoing to obtain additional information on the efficacy, safety and biological effects of ARRY-520 at 1.5 mg/m2/day with G-CSF support. Disclosures: Shah: Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: ARRY-520. Zonder:Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Medtronics: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy. Cohen:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria. Orlowski:Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alexanian:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Thomas:Array BioPharma: Research Funding; Centecor: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding. Weber:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Kaufman:Keryx: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Walker:Array BioPharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Litwiler:Array BioPharma: Employment. Karan:Array BioPharma: Employment. Hilder:a: Employment. Ptaszynski:Array BioPharma Inc.: Consultancy. Lonial:Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Lenalidomide (Revlimid), Bortezomib (Velcade) and Dexamethasone (RVD) for Heavily Pretreated Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.2936.2936 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 2936-2936

Author(s):

Victor H Jimenez-Zepeda ◽

Donna E. Reece ◽

Suzanne Trudel ◽

Christine Chen ◽

Vishal Kukreti

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

High Risk ◽

Research Funding ◽

Clinical Characteristics ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Prior Exposure ◽

Rank Test ◽

Continuous Variables ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2936 Almost all patients (pts) with multiple myeloma eventually relapse and remission duration decreases with each regimen. The median Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) in pts with relapsed myeloma refractory to lenalidomide (len) and bortezomib (btz) is poor at 5 and 9 months respectively. A phase 1 study of len plus btz in pts with relapsed or relapsed, refractory MM (RRMM) demonstrated favorable toxicity and promising response and survival further confirmed in a phase 2 study with len, btz and dexamethasone (dex) [RVD]. In this retrospective study, we assessed the efficacy and toxicity profile of RVD therapy for pts with advanced RRMM. We retrospectively reviewed the records of all pts with RRMM treated with RVD at Princess Margaret Hospital between 03/09 and 05/11. Relapse was defined according to the Uniform International Criteria. Pts were given RVD therapy as previous described by Anderson et al and must have completed at least one cycle of RVD therapy. Primary endpoints were response rate (RR), PFS, OS, and toxicity. Pts discontinued therapy if they experienced PD, no additional benefit or unacceptable toxicity. Definitions of response and progression were used according to the EBMT modified criteria with a category of very good partial response (VGPR). To examine variables independently prognostic for PFS and OS, multivariate Cox analysis was performed. Differences in continuous variables between groups were compared using Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Survival curves were constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Thirty pts with RRMM received RVD therapy. Clinical characteristics are seen in Table 1. Median age at RVD initiation was 57 yrs (37–76 yrs), and 46.7% were male. Pts received a median of 3 prior therapies (1–6). In many instances, pts previously treated with len had len added to btz + dex at progression (n=6), or pts previously treated with btz had btz added to len + dex, at progression (n=5). Thalidomide (thal), len and btz containing regimens were previously used in 60%, 73.3% and 80% of pts respectively. PR or better was observed in 46.6%. After a median of 4.6 cycles (1–14), VGPR was seen in 4.8%, PR in 33% and SD in 14%. Pts who achieved PR or better experienced a significant improvement in PFS. There was no difference in terms of RR between those pts according to prior exposure to either btz or len (p=0.7 and 0.9 respectively). Eight pts experienced non-hematological grade 3/4 adverse events (26%), including muscle weakness, sepsis and pneumonia but there was no worsening of peripheral neuropathy. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia were commonly seen in 70% of pts (n=21). Disease progression was seen in 19 pts at a median of 3.9 months. Median PFS for pts previously exposed to len was 2.3 months vs 2.9 months for those with no prior exposure (p=0.75). On the other hand, median PFS for pts previously exposed to btz was 2.1 months vs 3.4 months for those with no prior exposure (p=0.9) In addition, median PFS for pts who achieved at least PR was significantly better at 5.9 vs 2.0 months for those who did not (p<0.005). (Figure 1) FISH cytogenetics studies were available in 19 out of 30 patients at relapse: 5 -normal, 4–13q deletion, 3-p53 deletion and 2 - t(4, 14). High-risk MM pts had a median PFS significantly lower of 0.6 months (CI 95%, 0–1.99) vs 4.7 months for those without high-risk features (CI 2.5–7.0) (p=0.008) (Figure 2) At the time of submission, 13 pts are alive (43.3%) and 7 pts (23%) continue on RVD therapy.Table 1.Clinical characteristics of patients with RRMM treated with RVDClinical characteristic N=30MedianRange%Age5737-76Male46.7%Female53.3%Hemoglobin (g/L)10571-155Creatinine (mmol/L)99.936-383Beta-2 microglobulin (mmol/L)280119-1440Lactate dehydrogenase (U/L)18189-255IgG56.6% (17)IgA23.3% (7)IgM3.3% (1)Light Chain16.6% (5)Kappa (mg/L)4005.3-346063.3% (19)Lambda (mg/L)5145.1-530036.7% (11)KappaLambda*BMPC57%6-95%M-spike serum (g/L)300-77M-spike urine (g/d)0.890-7.9Prior therapies31-6ASCT83.3% (25)Thal60% (18)Len73.3% (22)Btz80% (24)*BMPC, Bone marrow plasma cells In conclusion, RVD is active and well tolerated in pts with RRMM, including pts who have received prior len, btz, thal and ASCT but PFS is short at 3.9 months in this highly advanced disease group of patients. We question whether response is dependent on recognized risk factors such as adverse cytogenetics. Disclosures: Jimenez-Zepeda: J & J: Honoraria. Reece:Bristol, Meyers, Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johnson&Johnson: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Phase 1/2 Trial Of Lenalidomide In Combination With Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone (REP) In Patients With Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (REPEAT-study)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.287.287 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 287-287 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Inger S. Nijhof ◽

Sonja Zweegman ◽

Mark-David Levin ◽

Harry R. Koene ◽

Aart Beeker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Background The outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients who are no longer responding to thalidomide, lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT) is very poor, with a median event-free survival of 5 months and median overall survival (OS) of 9 months (Kumar SK et al, Leukemia 2012; 26;149-157). We have previously shown in a small retrospective study that the combination of continuous low dose oral cyclophosphamide (endoxan) and prednisone combined with lenalidomide (REP) had remarkable activity in heavily pretreated LEN-refractory multiple myeloma patients (median 6 lines of previous chemotherapy) (vd Donk et al; Br J Haematol 2010;148(2):335-7). To determine the optimal dose of lenalidomide with continuous cyclophosphamide and prednisone, we initiated a prospective study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the REP regimen and to assess its efficacy and safety in LEN-refractory MM patients. Here we report safety and efficacy data from the phase 1 dose-escalation part of the REPEAT-study (NCT01352338). Patients and Methods Patients aged ≥ 18 years with LEN-refractory MM, ECOG-performance status 0-3 and adequate kidney, liver and hematologic function were included. Five dose levels were evaluated using a standard 3+3 design, based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. Patients received LEN in doses ranging from 10-25 mg/day on days 1-21 of 28-day cycle, while oral cyclophosphamide (50 or 100 mg) and prednisone (20 mg) were given continuously. Therapy was continued until progression. The MTD for the phase 2 part is defined as the highest dose level with 0 or 1 DLT's observed in 6 patients. Results Up till now, 35 patients were enrolled (22 in phase 1 and 13 in phase 2) from August 2011 to June 2013. The phase 2 part is still recruiting and data are not evaluable yet. One patient in phase 1 was excluded because of study violation and is not included in the analysis. The median age of the 21 evaluable patients in phase 1 was 69 years (range 41-73); 76% were male. The median duration of the disease from diagnosis was 41 months (range 18-96), median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 2-6), and 12 patients (57%) had previously received autologous SCT. All patients were LEN-refractory, 19 (90%) had prior BORT treatment, and 16 (76%) had BORT-refractory MM. Fifty-five % of the patients were considered high risk by FISH. At the time of analysis, 16 of 21 patients in phase 1 have discontinued treatment because of disease progression (13), alternative treatment (allo-SCT) (1), or adverse events (2). The MTD was defined as LEN 25 mg days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, combined with oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg and prednisone 20 mg continuously (dose level 4), based on three patients experiencing a DLT: two developed pneumonia (in dose levels 4 and 5; CTC grade 3), and one patient at dose level 5 experienced CTC grade 3 dyspnea. Neutropenia (18%) and thrombocytopenia (18%) were the most common grade 3 hematological adverse events (AEs), which were managed with growth factor support and/or dose modification. There were no grade 4 hematologic AEs. Grade 3 respiratory tract infections (29%) and grade 2 fatigue (19%) were the most common non-hematological AEs. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 1 patient. Figure 1 shows a waterfall plot of the responses of the patients that participated in the phase 1 part of the study. Overall response rate (≥ PR) was 67% with 6 out of 21 (29%) patients achieving at least VGPR. In addition 2 patients achieved MR (≥ MR: 76%). Median PFS and OS were 6.3 and 15.5 months respectively. Similar results were achieved in the subset of patients with LEN- and BORT-refractory disease. Interestingly, laboratory experiments with purified myeloma cells from these patients suggest synergism between LEN and cyclophosphamide. Conclusions The REP regimen induces high response rates and prolonged PFS and OS in LEN-refractory patients with acceptable toxicity. The MTD is defined as LEN 25 mg days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, combined with oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg and prednisone 20 mg continuously. Phase 2 is enrolling patients and evaluates efficacy and safety of the REP regimen at the MTD. REP should be considered a valuable salvage option for LEN-refractory MM patients. We will present an updated follow-up at ASH. Disclosures: Sonneveld: Onyx: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding. Lokhorst:Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Johnson-Cilag: Honoraria; Mudipharma: Honoraria. van de Donk:Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin In Combination With Vorinostat and Azacitidine In Older Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Final Results From A Phase 1/2 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.3936.3936 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 3936-3936 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Roland B. Walter ◽

Bruno C. Medeiros ◽

Kelda M. Gardner ◽

Kaysey F. Orlowski ◽

Leonel Gallegos ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Research Funding ◽

Blood Count ◽

Treatment Initiation ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

First Relapse ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Refractory Aml ◽

Count Recovery

Abstract Background Epigenetic therapeutics such as the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, vorinostat, and the DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) I inhibitor, azacitidine, sensitize AML cells in vitro to the CD33-targeting immunoconjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO). This observation, together with the improved clinical activity when HDAC inhibitors are used with DNMT inhibitors, prompted a phase 1/2 study (NCT00895934) of GO with vorinostat and azacitidine for primary refractory AML or AML in first relapse (remission duration ≤12 months) requiring 1stsalvage therapy. Methods Patients aged ≥50 years were eligible if they had an ECOG performance status of 0-3 and had adequate organ function. Patients with prior hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) were eligible if relapse occurred 6-12 months post-transplant. Excluded were patients with a second active malignancy, prior treatment with any of the study drugs, or central nervous system disease. Hydroxyurea was given to reduce the total white blood cell count to <25,000/μL before treatment. If there was persistent leukemia on day 15, the first cycle was repeated, and patients came off study if, after repetition, there was disease progression. In all other patients, a second cycle was begun if peripheral blood counts had recovered (blood count recovery was not required for patients with persistent leukemia) and all toxicities had resolved to ≤grade 2. Patients came off study if a partial remission was not achieved by the end of cycle 3, or if a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete peripheral blood count recovery (CRi) was not achieved by the end of cycle 6. During phase 1, patients were assigned to therapy according to a “3+3” study design; dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: 1) any grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >48 hours that results in >7 day delay of the subsequent treatment cycle, with the exception of febrile neutropenia or infection; 2) any grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity, with the exception of febrile neutropenia/infection or constitutional symptoms if recovery to grade ≤2 within 14 days; and 3) prolonged myelosuppression (platelet count <20,000/μL and/or absolute neutrophil count <500/μL at day 42 after treatment in patients without evidence of persistent leukemia). During phase 2, a Simon minimax two-stage design was to monitor whether a response rate of 0.34 was reached, with type I and II errors set at 0.1 and assuming a historical CR rate of 17% in these patients. Results 52 eligible patients, median age 64.8 (range, 50.2-78.9) years, with either primary refractory disease (n=29) or first relapse (n=23; median duration of first CR: 3 months) were enrolled and received a median of 2 (range, 1-4) cycles of therapy. During dose escalation, 1 DLT (death due to sepsis and respiratory failure) occurred at the 4th tested dose level after cycle 1, identifying vorinostat (400 mg/day orally from days 1-9), azacitidine (75 mg/m2/day IV or SC from days 1-7), and GO (3 mg/m2/day IV on days 4 and 8) as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). A total of 43 patients received therapy at the MTD level. Ten of these achieved CR, while 8 achieved CRi, for a CR/CRi rate of 18/43 (41.9%; exact 95% CI: 27.0-57.9%). Thirteen of the 18 patients that achieved CR/CRi were taken off protocol to receive additional, more intensive consolidative chemotherapy, including HCT (n=12). Of these 18 patients, 5 relapsed after a median of 122 (38-146) days, while 3 died while in remission after a CR duration of 46, 97, and 130 days, and 10 are in ongoing remission after a median of 326 (68- 710) days, respectively. Median overall survival for the 18 patients achieving CR/CRi was significantly longer than for those 21 patients who failed therapy but lived at least 29 days (i.e. did not experience treatment-related mortality) after treatment initiation (224.5 [range 70-798]) vs. 95 [36-900] days, log rank P-value=0.0023). Four patients died within 28 days of treatment initiation. Besides grade 3-4 cytopenias, infectious complications were the most common grade 33 adverse events. Only 1 patient developed possible liver toxicity (abdominal pain/distention and mild ascites) after 4 cycles of therapy, although bilirubin and transaminases were only minimally elevated and doppler studies were unremarkable. Conclusion Our study indicates that GO in combination with vorinostat and azacitidine has encouraging anti-AML activity in older adults with relapsed/refractory AML. Disclosures: Walter: Amgen, Inc: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Use of vorinostat/azacitidine/gemtuzumab ozogamicin for the treatment of relapsed/refractory AML.

Download Full-text

An Open-Label, Dose Escalation, Multi-Center Phase 1 Study of PRLX 93936, an Agent Synthetically Active Against the Activated Ras Pathway, in the Treatment of Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.2140.2140 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 2140-2140 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Peter M Voorhees ◽

Robert L. Schlossman ◽

Cristina J Gasparetto ◽

Jesus G. Berdeja ◽

John Morris ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Ras Pathway ◽

Label Dose

Abstract Introduction: Overall survival for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) has improved, but most patients relapse and eventually succumb to complications of the disease. The development of new therapeutic agents to treat relapsed and relapsed/refractory MM is therefore vital. Proteins of the Ras family are frequently mutated in human cancers, including MM. However, direct, selective, potent inhibitors of mutant Ras proteins are not clinically available. Extensive efforts have been made to identify agents which are "synthetically active" against the activated Ras pathway which may not inhibit the Ras protein itself, but target other molecules selectively important for cells with, but not those without, Ras mutation. PRLX 93936, 3-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-2-[(1-piperazinyl)methyl]-4(3H)-quinazolinone, is an analog of such a "synthetically active" compound against the activated Ras pathway. The compound has demonstrated promising efficacy in preclinical laboratory studies and mouse models of MM with an improvement in survival and 30% suppression in tumor growth at the lowest tested dose. A phase 1, multi-center, open-label, dose escalation trial was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), assess toxicities, and evaluate response to treatment with monotherapy of PRLX 93936 in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM. Methods: Patients (Pts) with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM in whom at least two prior anti-myeloma regimens had failed (including a proteasome inhibitor and/or immunomodulatory drug) were considered. PRLX 93936 as a single agent was given intravenously 3 days/week for 3 weeks followed by a 9 day rest period constituting a 28-day treatment cycle. Sequential cohorts of at least three pts were treated with escalating doses of PRLX 93936 beginning at 10 mg/m2 and increasing the dose in increments of 5mg/m2 until the MTD was established. Pts received a minimum of 2 cycles of treatment at their assigned dose level for evaluation of anti-myeloma activity of PRLX 93936 and could receive up to 8 cycles followed by an option of maintenance therapy. Dexamethasone at a dose of 20 mg provided on each day of PRLX 93936 infusion could be added at the investigator’s discretion after a minimum of 2 cycles or after cycle 1 for patients with progressive disease. Adverse events were assessed according to version 4.0 of the CTC, and response per the International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria, incorporating the modified EBMT response criteria, were assessed with each cycle. Correlative studies from peripheral blood and bone marrow were collected. Results: To date, 14 pts (4 women, 10 men) enrolled in the trial and 13 have completed therapy. Mean age was 61 years (range, 48-81). Prior to enrollment, pts had received an average of 5 lines of therapy (median 4, range 2-9) including 6 who received stem cell transplantation (4 autologous, 2 allogeneic). The median time since diagnosis was 5 years (range 2-11.5). Of the 13 pts whom completed treatment, 11 completed at least one full 28 day cycle (range 1-15). This includes 3 pts at the 10mg/m2 dose, 3 pts at the 15mg/m2 dose, 5 pts at the 20 mg/m2 dose, and 2 pts at the 25mg/m2 dose. Of the 13 pts who completed study therapy, 7 experienced at least one serious adverse event (SAE). The most frequently reported SAEs (2 each) included sepsis and cellulitis. Four SAEs were considered related to PRLX 93936 by the investigator (thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, nausea, and vomiting). The MTD was determined to be 20 mg/m2. Dose limiting toxicities that occurred at the next higher level of 25mg/m2 included nausea, vomiting, and neutropenia (both pts) and thrombocytopenia, weakness, elevated AST, and elevated creatinine (1 pt). The best response among 11 evaluable pts was minimal response (MR) in 2 pts (18%). Stable disease (n=4) and progressive disease (n=5) was observed in the remaining pts. Analysis of the impact of dexamethasone is on-going, but no significant additive toxicity has been seen. Conclusions: PRLX 93936, a “synthetically active” compound against the activated Ras pathway, has demonstrated activity as a single agent in relapsed and refractory MM patients with MR in 18% of patients to date. Toxicity has proven manageable and the MTD has been defined at 20 mg/m2. Additional studies, including those involving PRLX 93936 as part of combination therapy and correlative studies to determine those pts most likely to benefit, are warranted. Disclosures Voorhees: Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company : Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: PRLX 93936 is a non-FDA approved drug currently in phase 1 development in multiple myeloma. Gasparetto:Millenium: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jacobstein:Prolexys Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Anderson:BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Oncopep/Acetylon: Equity Ownership. Mitsiades:Millennium: A Takeda Oncology Company: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Laubach:Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Millennium: A Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding. Richardson:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Co.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Study of the Investigational Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib Alone or in Combination with Lenalidomide–Dexamethasone (Rd) in Japanese Patients (Pts) with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5752.5752 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5752-5752 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Hiroshi Handa ◽

Kenshi Suzuki ◽

Takaaki Chou ◽

Takafumi Matsushima

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Proteasome Inhibitor ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Japanese Patients ◽

M Protein ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Ongoing Phase

Background Ixazomib is the first oral proteasome inhibitor to be investigated clinically for the treatment of MM. Phase 1 studies have shown single-agent activity and manageable toxicities in RRMM (Kumar et al. Blood 2014) and phase 1/2 studies have suggested the feasibility and activity of weekly oral ixazomib plus Rd in previously untreated MM (Kumar et al. ASH 2012; Richardson et al. ASH 2013). These findings have led to ongoing phase 3 trials of weekly ixazomib 4 mg + Rd in RRMM and previously untreated MM. However, the early-phase studies were conducted in Western pts. This phase 1, open-label multicenter study aimed to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of weekly ixazomib alone or with Rd in Japanese pts with RRMM (Japic Clinical Trials Information no. 121822). Methods Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability, including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs), and the PK of ixazomib alone or with Rd. A secondary objective was evaluation of antitumor activity. Japanese pts aged ≥20 years with RRMM who had received at least 2 prior regimens, which must have included bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide, and corticosteroids, were eligible. All had measurable disease and ECOG performance status of 0–2. Pts with grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy or grade ≥2 diarrhea at study entry were excluded. Pts received ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles, alone or with Rd (lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1–21, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22), per the regimen used in the ongoing phase 3 trials. AEs were graded per NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Blood samples for PK analysis were taken at multiple time points prior to and after dosing on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1. Responses were assessed per IMWG uniform response criteria. Results Fourteen pts were enrolled; 8 (57%) were male, median age was 62.5 yrs (range 53–71), 4 pts were aged ≥65 yrs, median number of prior therapies was 7. Seven pts received single-agent ixazomib and 7 received ixazomib + Rd. One pt in each cohort was excluded from the DLT-evaluable population. Two patients experienced DLTs in cycle 1: 1 pt receiving single-agent ixazomib had grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 diarrhea, hypertension, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and nausea; 1 pt in the ixazomib + Rd cohort had grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. All events were considered treatment-related. At data cut-off (Jan 6 2014), 6 pts remained on treatment and 8 had discontinued due to: progressive disease (PD; n=3), AEs (n=3), symptomatic deterioration, and protocol violation (each n=1). At data cut-off, pts (n=14) had received a median of 6 cycles of ixazomib (range 1–21); the 7 pts in the ixazomib + Rd cohort had received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–12) of ixazomib + Rd. Thirteen (93%) pts experienced treatment-related AEs; the most common were neutropenia (71%), thrombocytopenia (71%), leukopenia (64%), lymphopenia (57%), and diarrhea (50%). There were no cases of peripheral neuropathy. Nine (64%) pts had grade ≥3 AEs; the most common were lymphopenia (50%), neutropenia (43%), and thrombocytopenia (36%). Two (14%) pts (single-agent cohort) had serious AEs (grade 2 bronchitis in 1 pt, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 hypokalemia in 1 pt). Three pts discontinued due to AEs; 1 due to diarrhea in the single-agent cohort, and 1 due to neutropenia and 1 due to thrombocytopenia in the ixazomib + Rd cohort. There were no deaths. PK data showed ixazomib was rapidly absorbed with a Tmax at 1.08–1.83 hrs. Terminal half-life (geometric mean) was 5.7 days for single-agent ixazomib and 5.2 days for ixazomib + Rd. There were no substantial differences in the ixazomib PK profile between the two cohorts. Thirteen pts were response-evaluable. One pt (ixazomib + Rd cohort) had a partial response; at data cut-off, this pt remained in response with a 100% M-protein reduction (unconfirmed VGPR) and duration of response of ~10.8 months. Seven pts had stable disease (including 3 with M-protein reductions of 25–50%), 2 had PD, and 3 were not assessable. Conclusions These data suggest that ixazomib 4 mg alone or with Rd is feasible and tolerable in Japanese pts with RRMM. The AEs were manageable, reflecting the AE profile seen in Western populations, supporting the use of this dose and schedule in Japanese pts. Disclosures Handa: Celgene: Research Funding; Yakult: Research Funding; Kirin: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Investigational agent ixazomib for the treatment of Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.. Matsushima:Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited : Employment.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of Melflufen, a Peptidase Targeted Therapy, and Dexamethasone in an Ongoing Open-Label Phase 2a Study in Patients with Relapsed and Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Including an Initial Report on Progression Free Survival

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.3029.3029 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 3029-3029

Author(s):

Peter M. Voorhees ◽

Valeria Magarotto ◽

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Torben Plesner ◽

Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Study Drug ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival

Abstract Background: Melflufen is a highly potent anti-angiogenic compound that triggers rapid, robust and irreversible DNA damage and exerts its cytotoxicity through alkylation of DNA. The lipophilicity of melflufen leads to rapid and extensive distribution into tissues and cells where it binds directly to DNA or is readily metabolized by intracellular peptidases into hydrophilic alkylating metabolites. With targeted delivery of alkylating metabolites to tumor cells in vitro (such as multiple myeloma that are rich in activating peptidase), melflufen exerts a 20-100 fold higher anti-tumor potency and produces a 20 fold higher intracellular concentration of alkylating moieties compared with melphalan. Methods: Melflufen is evaluated in combination with dexamethasone (dex) 40 mg weekly in an ongoing Phase 1/2a study. RRMM patients with measurable disease and at least 2 prior lines of therapy are eligible (NCT01897714). Phase 1 established the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of melflufen to be 40 mg every 3 weeks in combination with low dose dex. The primary objective of Phase 2a is the overall response rate and safety of the MTD in a total of 55 patients. Response was investigator assessed at the end of each cycle by IMWG criteria. Here we present the Phase 2 data as of 14 July 2015 data-cut. Results: Thirty-one patients were dosed at the MTD. The median time from initial diagnosis to first dose of melflufen was 6 years (1-15). The median number of prior therapies was 4 (2-9). 97% of patients were exposed to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), 90% to proteasome inhibitors (PIs), 77% to melphalan, and 71% had received prior autologous stem cell transplant. 58% were double refractory (IMiDs and PIs) and 42% were triple refractory (IMiDs, PIs and alkylators). In total, 121 doses of melflufen have been given (1-11 cycles). Median treatment duration was 13 weeks with 9 patients still ongoing. One patient completed therapy as planned, 15 patients discontinued due to AEs (48%) and 6 due to progression (19%). Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response (protocol defined as ≥2 doses of melflufen with baseline and follow-up response assessments). One patient achieved a very good partial response and 10 patients achieved partial response (PR) (1 unconfirmed, still ongoing) for an overall response rate (ORR) of 48%. Three additional patients achieved minimal response (MR) for a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 61%. Time to clinical benefit and response was rapid with 93% of patients achieving ≥ MR after 1-3 cycles and 64% achieving PR after only 1-3 cycles. Eight patients maintained stable disease and 1 patient had early progressive disease. Similar ORRs were seen in PI-refractory (43%), IMiD-refractory (40%), alkylator-refractory (62%), double-refractory (38%) and triple-refractory (50%) patients. The median progression free survival (PFS) is currently at 7.6 months (95% confidence interval: 3.4 - ∞) based on 14 events in 30 patients. The most frequent adverse events (AE), all grades, occurring in >10% of patients, regardless of relationship to study drug were thrombocytopenia (94%), anemia (84%), neutropenia (61%), leukopenia (42%), pyrexia (36%), asthenia (32%), fatigue and nausea (26%), bone pain (19%), cough, diarrhea, dyspnea, mucosal inflammation and upper respiratory infection (16%) and constipation and epistaxis (13%). Treatment-related Grade 3 or 4 AEs were reported in 27 patients (87%). Those occurring in >5% of patients were thrombocytopenia (68%), neutropenia (55%), anemia (42%), leukopenia (32%) and febrile neutropenia, fatigue, pyrexia, asthenia and hyperglycemia each occurred in 6% of patients. Serious AEs occurred in 9 patients (29%), but were only assessed as related to study drug in 5 patients (16%) including 3 febrile neutropenia, 1 fever and 1 pneumonia. Cycle length has recently been increased to 28 days to improve tolerability with respect to hematologic toxicity. Conclusion: Melflufen has promising activity in heavily pretreated RRMM patients where conventional therapies have failed. The current ORR is 48% and CBR is 61%. Similar results were seen across patient populations regardless of refractory status. The median PFS is encouraging at 7.6 months. Hematologic toxicity was common, but non-hematologic AEs were infrequent. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Voorhees: Millennium/Takeda and Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array BioPharma, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, and Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Janssen, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline,Onyx Pharmaceuticals and Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sonneveld:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene and Onyx: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Plesner:Roche and Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen and Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genmab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mellqvist:Celgene, Amgen, Mundipharma and Novartis: Honoraria. Byrne:Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Harmenberg:Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Nordstrom:Oncopeptides: Employment. Palumbo:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria. Richardson:Oncopeptides, Celgene and Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text