Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy In Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Advanced Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3515-3515
Author(s):  
Ailsa Holroyd ◽  
Elizabeth Phillips ◽  
Richard Szydlo ◽  
David Marin ◽  
Letizia Foroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Advanced Phase ◽  
Historical Group

Abstract Abstract 3515 With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is largely reserved for patients with CML who do not achieve durable cytogenetic responses to TKIs or patients with advanced phase (Adv) disease. Data relating to the outcome of transplant in Adv-CML is limited. We have allografted 43 patients (median age 40.8 yrs) for Adv phase disease who had received prior treatment with one or more TKI. The indications for allo-SCT included progression from CP to accelerated phase (AP) (n=16) or blast crisis (BC) (n=11) on TKI and presentation in accelerated phase (AP) (n=9) or blast crisis (BC) (n=7). The median duration of TKI therapy prior to transplantation was 5.5 months (range 1–51 months); 42 patients received imatinib, 9 received dasatinib (8 following imatinib failure), 2 received nilotinib (following imatinib and dasatinib failure). 35 patients were transplanted from HLA-identical siblings and 36 patients received myeloablative conditioning. The status at transplant was CP>1 in 17 patients, AP in 24, and BC in 2. In patients in whom CP was restored prior to transplant (n=17), this had been achieved using a TKI only in 6 and with combination chemotherapy in 11. There was no difference in disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) between the TKI only group and the group that received chemotherapy in addition. Among the 43 patients in the TKI-treated cohort, 13 died without relapse, 3 from graft versus host disease (GVHD), 8 from sepsis, pneumonitis and multiorgan failure, and one each from graft failure and VOD. The estimated probabilities of non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days and 1 year were 17.3% and 43.3%, Grade 2–4 acute GVHD was seen in 24% and extensive cGVHD in 54%. The estimated 1- and 3-year DFS rates were 23% and 16%. The 1 year and 3 year estimates of overall survival according to disease stage at allo-SCT were as follows: AP (54.2% and 50%), CP >1 (49.4% and 29.6%) and BC disease 0% and 0%. The impact of maximal disease stage was examined, documented as either AP (23/43 patients) or BP (20/43 patients) at any time prior to allo-SCT. The probability of 3 year OS for patients who were in AP at maximal disease stage was 61% compared to 33% of patients who had at one time been in BC (p=0.04). Post allo-SCT, patients were monitored for relapse by RQ-PCR. Eleven patients received TKIs, 5 for molecular relapse, 1 for cytogenetic relapse, 4 for hematological relapse and 1 for GvHD. Three of the 11 remain alive, 2 of whom received a TKI for molecular relapse.We compared the outcome of these 43 patients with that of 158 patients who were transplanted for Adv-CML but who had been treated before TKI became available. The disease status at time of transplant was AP (n=90), CP>1 (n=41) and BC (n=27). The two groups were matched for type of donor, conditioning regimens and time from diagnosis to transplant but the historical group were younger at allo-SCT with a median age of 33.3 yrs (p=0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidences of acute and chronic GvHD, NRM, DFS or OS between the two groups. The 1 year and 3 year estimates of OS for the historical cohort were 46.4% and 38.5% in AP, 53.7% and 24.3% for CP >1 and 7% and 0% in BC. For the total group of 201 patients the outcome of transplant defined as 3yr OS was 40.9% for AP 25.7% for CP>1 and 0% for BC. In conclusion, we found that patients receiving transplant for advanced phase disease after prior treatment with a TKI have similar outcomes to a historical group of advanced phase patients transplanted prior to the advent of TKI therapy. Our data strongly support the influence of disease stage in prediction of allo-SCT survival. Allo-SCT may be valuable for CML patients who have never progressed to BC. Overt BC is a predictor of poor allo-SCT outcome, so attempts should be made to restore CP prior to allo-SCT. Close monitoring of patients still classifiable as AP who are responding poorly to TKI should permit identification of those who may do well if offered allo-SCT before their disease has progressed further. Disclosures: Marin: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Outcome of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2149-2149
Author(s):  
Romil Patel ◽  
Neeraj Y Saini ◽  
Ankur Varma ◽  
Omar Hasan ◽  
Qaiser Bashir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
First Remission ◽  
Relapsed Disease

Abstract Introduction: The role of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) in the management of patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM), a rare, indolent lymphoma, has not been established. We had previously published our experience with auto-HCT in a small cohort of WM patients1. Here, we present an updated analysis of auto-HCT with a larger cohort of WM patients. Methods and study population: The study cohort was comprised of 29 patients who underwent high-dose chemotherapy and auto-HCT at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to create survival curves. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration from date of transplant to death or last date of follow-up in living patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the duration from date of transplant to either progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first. Results: Median age at auto-HCT was 60 (range, 43-75 years). Eight patients (28%) had concurrent light chain amyloidosis (AL). Of the five patients who had MYD88 testing completed, 3 were positive for the MYD88 mutation. Additionally, of these 3 patients, 2 were also positive for CXCR4 mutation. Patients received a median of 2 lines (range 1-6) of therapy prior to auto-HCT; 3(10%) patients had primary refractory disease, 8(28%) were in first remission, and 18 (62%) had relapsed disease. Median time from transplant to last follow-up for the surviving patients was 5.3 years. Preparative regimens received by the patients were: Melphalan (n=20), BEAM-R (n=2), Busulfan/Melphalan (n=1), Cyclophosphomaide/Etoposide/total body irradiation (n=1), Thiotepa/Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (n=1), and Carmustine/Thiotepa (n=1). Three patients further went on to receive allogeneic transplant either after relapse from auto-HCT or due to disease transformation to aggressive lymphoma. Twenty-eight patients achieved engraftment with a median time to neutrophil engraftment of 11 days (range, 10-15 days). One patient suffered primary graft failure due to progression of disease and died 84 days after transplant. Non-relapse mortality was 3.4% at 1 year. All patients were eligible for response evaluation. The median OS from diagnosis was 12.2 years. Overall response rate was 96%: complete response (n=8, 27.6%), very good partial response (n=5, 17.3%), partial response (n=15, 51.7%), and progressive disease (n=1, 3.4%). PFS and OS at 5 years were 43.3% and 62.9%, respectively. Median PFS and OS from auto-HCT were 4.1 and 7.3 years (Fig. 1A). The median OS from auto-HCT in first remission + primary refractory and relapsed disease was 8.2 years and 4.1 years, respectively.16 patients were alive at the time of censoring while 13 patients had died. Causes of death include relapsed disease (n=6), secondary malignancy (n=2), infection (n=1), chronic graft-versus-host disease (n=1), and unknown (n=3). 8 patients (28%) were positive for concurrent AL amyloidosis. The sites of amyloid involvement were kidneys (n=2), lungs (n=1), bone marrow (n=1), heart(n=1), lymph nodes(n=1), gastrointestinal tract (n=1) and subcutaneous fat aspirate(n=5). The median overall survival for patients with amyloid involvement (n=8) was 12 years. On univariate analyses, the number of chemotherapy regimens prior to transplant (≤ 2 vs >2 lines) was the strongest predictor of overall survival (p=0.03, HR 0.3, CI: 0.09-0.9, log-rank) and PFS (p=0.001, HR 0.24, CI: 0.07-0.85, log-rank). The median PFS in patients with ≤ 2 lines and > 2 lines of therapy was 71 months versus 19 months, respectively (Fig. 1B). Conclusion: Auto-HCT is safe and feasible in selected patients with WM, with a high response rate and durable remission even in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. References: Krina Patel et.al. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. Blood 2012 120:4533; Disclosures Thomas: Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb Inc.: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Array Pharma: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Research Funding. Lee:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies Corporation: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai Biopharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Orlowski:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; BioTheryX: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Champlin:Otsuka: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Patel:Poseida Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes 50 Years or Older. A Retrospective Survey from the EBMT.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 520-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZiYi Lim ◽  
Ronald Brand ◽  
Anja van Biezen ◽  
Jurgen Finke ◽  
Dietger W. Niederwieser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Donor Type ◽  
Advanced Disease Stage

Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for patients with MDS. However, the advanced age of the majority of patients with MDS poses a significant barrier to the success of transplantation. Many of these patients have co-morbidities, or lack a suitable sibling matched donor. While reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) has expanded the scope of allografting to older patients, it remains unclear as to whether it confers an improvement in overall survival in this patient sub-group. Here we report on the results of a retrospective multi-centre analysis of 1385 patients aged 50 years or older with MDS transplanted since 1993. The main variables analysed in this study were donor status (sibling vs unrelated matched), age group (50–60 years vs >60years), disease stage at time of transplantation (early:<5% blasts vs advanced:>5% blasts), type of conditioning regimen (RIC vs standard myeloablative conditioning, SMC), period of transplantation (1993–96, 1997–2000–2001-). There were 1000 matched sibling (72%) and 385 matched unrelated donor transplants (28%). The median age of the cohort was 56 years (range:50–74 years), with 1053 patients (76%) aged 50–60 years and 332 patients (24%) above 60 years. 604 patients(44%) received SMC and 781 patients (56%) received RIC. 189 patients (14%) had RA/RARS, 388 patients (28%) had RAEB, 233 patients(17%) had RAEB-t and 393 patients secondary AML (28%). FAB classification was unavailable for 182 patients (13%). Patients receiving RIC were older (age>60 years: 30% RIC vs 14% SMC, p<0.001), but SMC had a more advanced disease stage at transplant (42% RIC vs 51% SMC). There was no difference in donor type between RIC and SMC (MUD: 28% RIC vs 28% SMC) The estimated cumulative incidence (competing risk model) at 4-years post transplant for TRM decreased from 47%(1993–1996), via 40%(1997–2000) to 35%(2001-); for Relapse Incidence these figures are 29%, 33% and 40% respectively. On multivariate analysis, age >60 years(HR:1.28, 95%CI [1.0–1.6], p=0.04), use of RIC (HR:1.50 95%CI [1.2–1.9], p<0.001) and advanced disease stage at transplantation (HR:1.51, 95%CI [1.2–2.0], p=0.002) were associated with an increased relapse rate; the use of RIC with a lower TRM (HR:0.71, 95%CI [0.57–0.88], p<0.01) and advanced disease stage at transplantation with a higher TRM (HR: 1.4, 95%CI [1.1–1.8], p<0.01) In contrast, donor type did not significantly influence either the 4-year TRM or relapse rates(HR’s 1.12 and 0.94 respectively, both p>0.30). Advanced disease stage at transplantation was the only independent variable associated with an inferior 4-year overall survival(OS)(HR: 1.47, 95%CI [1.2–1.8], p<0.001). In conclusion, disease stage at time of transplantation has an important prognostic impact on outcomes. The use of RIC is associated with higher relapse but lower TRM and comparable OS with SMC in this cohort. While patients aged >60 years had an increased relapse rate, there was no significant difference in OS compared with those aged 50–60 years. The choice of donor did not significantly influence outcomes. Long-term survival can be achieved in a sub-group of older MDS patients, but prospective studies are warranted to improve patient selection and to identify optimal treatment strategies.

The Impact Of Balanced and Unbalanced Karyotypes On Prognosis Of CML: From Chronic Phase To Blast Crisis

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3996-3996
Author(s):  
Lida Kalmanti ◽  
Christian Dietz ◽  
Claudia Haferlach ◽  
Gudrun Göring ◽  
Brigitte Schlegelberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Y Chromosome ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Chromosomal Changes ◽  
Variant Translocation

Abstract Introduction Current evidence indicates that acquired genetic instability in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) as a consequence of the balanced reciprocal translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11) or the variant translocation t(v;22) and the resulting BCR-ABL fusion causes the continuous acquisition of additional chromosomal aberrations (ACA) and mutations and thereby progression to accelerated phase and blast crisis (BC). At least 10% of patients in chronic phase (CP) CML show ACA already at diagnosis and more than 80% of patients acquire ACA during the transformation process into BC. Therefore, alterations at diagnosis as well as acquisition of chromosomal changes during treatment are considered as a poor prognostic factor. Differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been detected depending on the type of ACA. Patients with major route ACA (+8, i(17)(q10), +19, +der(22)t(9;22)(q34;q11)) and with other alterations like -X, del(1)(q21), del(5)(q11q14), +10, -21 at diagnosis resulting in an unbalanced karyotype have a worse outcome. Patients with minor route ACA (for example reciprocal translocations other than the t(9;22)(q34;q11) (e.g. t(1;21), t(2;16), t(3;12), t(4;6), t(5;8), t(15;20)) resulting in a balanced karyotype show no differences in OS and PFS compared to patients with the standard translocation, a variant translocation or the loss of the Y chromosome (Fabarius et al., Blood 2011). Here we compare the type of chromosomal changes (i.e. balanced vs. unbalanced karyotypes) during the course of the disease from CP to BC aiming to provide a valid parameter for future risk stratification. Patients and Methods Clinical and cytogenetic data available from 1,346 out of 1,524 patients at diagnosis (40% females vs. 60% males; median age 53 years (range, 16-88)) with Philadelphia and BCR-ABL positive CP CML included until March 2012 in the German CML-Study IV (a randomized 5-arm trial to optimize imatinib therapy) were investigated. ACA were comparatively analyzed in CP and in BC. Results At diagnosis 1,174/1,346 patients (87%) had the standard t(9;22)(q34;q11) only and 75 patients (6%) had a variant t(v;22). Ninety-seven patients (7%) had additional cytogenetic aberrations. Of these, 44 patients (3%) lacked the Y chromosome (-Y) and 53 patients (4%) had ACA. Regarding the patients with ACA thirty-six of the 53 patients (68%) had an unbalanced karyotype and 17/53 patients (32%) a balanced karyotype. During the course of the disease 73 patients (out of 1,524 patients) developed a BC during the observation time (5%). Cytogenetic data were available in 52 patients with BC (21 patients with BC had no cytogenetic analysis). Three patients had a normal male or female karyotype after stem cell transplantation. Nine patients showed the translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11) or a variant translocation t(v;22) (six and three patients, respectively) only and in 40 patients ACA could be observed in BC (40/49 (82%)). Out of these 40 patients with ACA, 90% showed an unbalanced karyotype whereas only 10% of patients had a balanced karyotype. No male patient in BC showed the loss of the Y chromosome pointing to a minor effect of this numerical alteration on disease progression. Conclusion We conclude that patients with CML and unbalanced karyotype at diagnosis are under higher risk to develop CML BC compared to patients with balanced karyotypes or compared to patients without ACA. In BC, 90% of CML patients showed unbalanced karyotypes (only 68% of CML patients at diagnosis have unbalanced karyotypes) supporting the hypothesis that the imbalance of chromosomal material is a hallmark of disease progression, representing the natural history of the disease from CP to BC and indicating therefore a strong prognostic impact. Consequently, different therapeutic options (such as intensive therapy or stem cell transplantation) should be considered for patients with unbalanced karyotypes in CP CML at diagnosis. Disclosures: Haferlach: MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hehlmann:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, travel Other; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer : Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad : Consultancy, Honoraria. Müller:Ariad: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Saussele:Pfizer: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other.

scholarly journals Reduced Intensity Vs. Myeloablative Conditioning Followed By Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Long Term Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized EBMT Phase III Study (RICMAC-Trial)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1019-1019
Author(s):  
Nicolaus Kroeger ◽  
Simona Iacobelli ◽  
Linda Koster ◽  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Introduction Retrospective studies in MDS/sAML suggest that reducing the intensity of the conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation reduces the risk of non-relapse mortality but is associated with a higher risk of relapse. A higher risk of relapse after RIC was confirmed in a prospective BMT CTN study but the prospective randomized studies from the EBMT for MDS and sAML did not show a difference in outcome after 2 years (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;35(19):2157-2164). Here we present a long term follow-up of the study after a median follow-up of 75 months (range 4-150 months). Methods Within the European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) we conducted a prospective, multicenter, open label, randomized phase III trial comparing comparing a busulfan based (Busulfan 8mg/kg orally or equivalent dosis intravenously (iv) plus fludarabin 180mg/m²) reduced intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) and a standard myeloablative busulfan (Busulfan 16mg/kg orally or equivalent dosis iv plus cyclophosphamide 120mg/kg) based regimen (MAC) in patients with MDS or sAML (<20 % blasts). Between May 2004 and December 2012, a total of 129 patients were enrolled from 18 centers. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio and stratified according to donor, age and blast count. Results In the first report (JCO 2017) the CI of NRM after 1 year was 17% (95% CI 8-26%) after RIC and 25% (95% CI 15-36%) after MAC (p = 0.29). The CI of relapse at 2 years was 17% (95% CI 8-26%) after RIC and 15% (95% CI 6-24%) after MAC (p = 0.6), resulting in a 2 year relapse-free and overall survival of 62% (95% CI 50-74%) and 76% (95% CI 66-87%) after RIC and 58% (95% CI 46-71%) and 63% (95% CI 51-75%) after MAC (p = 0.58 and p = 0.08, respectively). In the current follow-up study, all cases but one who were alive at last report could be updated. The median follow-up is now 75 months in the MAC and 72 months in the RIC arm. Since last follow-up =18 death occurred in both arm (MAC n=8, RIC n=10) 8 relapses (MAC n=4; RIC n=4) and 6 NRM (MAC n=2; RIC n=4). Second allogeneic stem cell transplantation was performed in 18 patients (n=10 in RIC and n=8 in MAC) due to graft failure (n=4) relapse (n=11) and others (n=3). The CI of chronic GvHD at 5 years was 65% (95% CI: 53-78) after RIC and 68% after MAC ((95% CI: 55-81; p = 0.70). At 5 years there was no difference in CI of NRM (22%, 95%CI: 12-32 vs 30% , 95%CI : 19-42, p=0.5) in CI of Relapse (22% , 95% CI: 12-32 vs18%, 95% CI: 8-28, p= 0.7), Relapse free- (57%, 95% CI: 44-69 vs51%, 95% CI: 39-64, p=0.8) and Overall survival (69%, 95% CI: 58-80 vs 53%, 95% CI: 40-65, p=0.15) between RIC and MAC, respectively. Conclusion This long term follow-up of the prospective randomized EBMT trial confirmed early results that RIC resulted in at least similar long term relapse-free and overall survival as MAC in patients with MDS or sAML. The trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01203228. Disclosures Niederwieser: Miltenyi: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding. Platzbecker:Celgene: Research Funding. Scheid:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Stelljes:MSD: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; JAZZ: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Heim:Novartis: Research Funding. Bethge:Miltenyi Biotec GmbH: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Neovii GmbH: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kobbe:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding.

Poor Overall Survival of Patients with Ibrutinib-Resistant Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3047-3047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Martin ◽  
Kami J. Maddocks ◽  
Katherine Noto ◽  
Beth Christian ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Purine Analog ◽  
Ibrutinib Resistance

Abstract Introduction The United States Food and Drug Administration approved ibrutinib for treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) that have received at least one prior therapy based on a phase II trial demonstrating a 68% response rate with a median progression-free survival of 13.9 months (Wang et al, NEJM 2013). Despite this significant efficacy, recent data suggest that primary or secondary resistance to ibrutinib is common and the mechanisms of ibrutinib resistance are varied (Chiron et al, Cancer Discovery 2014). The outcomes of MCL patients with ibrutinib resistance have not been previously reported, and the ideal management of patients with ibrutinib-resistant MCL is not known. Methods Following IRB approval, we performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients with MCL at WCMC and OSU that had experienced disease progression while receiving ibrutinib in a clinical trial or in routine clinical use. We evaluated historical medical records for clinical, pathological, and radiological data. Time-to-event statistics were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results We identified 32 subjects (19 male, 13 female) with primary or acquired ibrutinib resistant MCL. The median age at start of ibrutinib was 70 years (range 50-83), and the median number of prior therapies was 3 (0-9), including 2 patients with no prior therapy. The median time from diagnosis to start of ibrutinib was 32.5 months (range 0-223). Of the 30 patients that had received prior treatment, all had received rituximab, 21 had received bendamustine, 19 received bortezomib, 10 received an IMiD, 5 had received cytarabine, 5 had received methotrexate, 4 had received a purine analog, 2 received a PI3K inhibitor, and 1 had received an mTOR inhibitor. Five had undergone prior stem cell transplantation (3 auto, 2 allo). Only 11/30 patients had responded to their prior treatment, with a median time of 2.5 months between the prior treatment and ibrutinib. Four of 18 patients with morphology evaluated within 6 months of start of ibrutinib had blastoid MCL, and 11/19 patients had a previously reported Ki67 of >30%. The MIPI scores were as follows: 18 high risk, 5 intermediate risk, and 8 low risk, 1 not evaluable. Best response to ibrutinib was reported as follows: PD 20, SD 2, PR 6, CR 2, not evaluable 2. The median time on ibrutinib was 2.5 months (range 0-11). Among 27 patients with available follow-up data, 19 received treatment following ibrutinib with a median time of 0 months between stopping ibrutinib and starting subsequent treatment. The MIPI scores at start of subsequent therapy were as follows: 11 high risk, 3 intermediate risk, 3 low risk, and 2 unknown. Subsequent treatments included the following: 11 rituximab, 6 lenalidomide, 6 alkylator, 3 bendamustine, 2 anthracycline, 1 bortezomib, 1 purine analog. Two patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Six of 17 patients evaluated for response demonstrated an objective response to subsequent treatment, including 2 patients that received bendamustine, 2 patients that received lenalidomide (one in combination with bendamustine), one that received an anthracycline, and one that received a purine analog. The median overall survival following cessation of ibrutinib was 4 months (95% CI 2-10 months). Both patients that underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation died, one at 4 months from toxicity and one at 5 months from disease progression. Twelve patients were still alive, including four patients with more than 6 months of follow up (17, 22, 25, and 32+ months). There was no clear association between number of prior therapies, response to ibrutinib, morphology, Ki67 prior to ibrutinib, response to ibrutinib, duration of ibrutinib, or choice of subsequent therapy and OS. Conclusions In a group of patients with highly treatment-resistant MCL, primary and secondary ibrutinib resistance was associated with poor clinical outcomes, with limited duration of response to subsequent therapy and short overall survival. As yet, there are no identifiable predictors of clinical outcome following development of ibrutinib resistance, nor are there any clear signs that specific therapies might be particularly effective in this setting. Additional investigation into the outcomes of these patients is warranted. Clinical trials evaluating combinations with ibrutinib should be prioritized, as should trials of novel agents in the post-ibrutinib setting. Disclosures Martin: Janssen: Honoraria. Maddocks:Pharmacyclics: Advisory Board Other, Research Funding. Furman:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Jones:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ruan:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Blum:Janssen, Pharmacyclics : Research Funding.

Immunoparesis Recovery As Predictor Marker of Progression after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4356-4356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Gonzalez De La Calle ◽  
Eduardo Sobejano ◽  
Julio Davila ◽  
Enrique M Ocio ◽  
Noemi Puig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
B Lymphocyte ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract BACKGROUND High dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard of care, especially in Europe, for young and eligible multiple myeloma patients (usually younger than 65 years old). Immunoparesis is defined as a reduction (below the lower normal limit) in the levels of 1 or 2 uninvolved immunoglobulins (Ig) and it is related to a reversible suppression of B lymphocytes that correlates inversely with disease stage. B Lymphocyte reconstitution begins at 3 months after ASCT, with maximum B lymphocyte levels at 1 year after ASCT. AIMS The goal of the present study was to investigate the role of the immunoparesis recovery after ASCT as predictor of relapse or progression in multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS We reviewed medical records of MM patients who underwent to ASCT at University Hospital of Salamanca between 1992 and 2013. The primary endpoint was time to relapse or progression from ASCT. Ig (Ig G, Ig A e Ig M) were collected at the time of diagnosis, before ASCT, every 3 months during the first year after ASCT, and every year up to 5 years after ASCT among eligible patients until the relapse or disease progression. RESULTS 106 multiple myeloma patients who underwent ASCT were included in the analysis. Conventional chemotherapy was administered as induction regimen in 69 patients (65%), whereas novel agents were used in 37 patients (35%). Most patients had immunoparesis at diagnosis (91%) and at the moment of ASCT as well (94%). After a median follow-up of 62 months, median time to progression or relapse (TTP) from ASCT was 31 months (95 % CI: 24.1 - 37.1 months). MM patients with immunoparesis 1 year after ASCT had a significantly shorter median TTP as compared with patients without immunoparesis (33.5 months vs 94.2 months; HR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.13-4.05; p=0.019). In the group of patients with reduction of both Igs, median TTP was slightly inferior than in the group with reduction of only one of them(33.5 vs 36.4 months, p=0.03). Presence of ISS 3, high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis, less than partial response achieved before and three months after ASCT were also identified as predictors of progression. Multivariate analysis selected immunoparesis 1 year after ASCT as an independent variable for relapse or progression (HR: 5.97, 95% CI: 1.63-21.88; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS The lack of immunoparesis recovery at 1 year after ASCT in MM patients is associated with significantly higher risk of relapse or progression and this group of patients could potentially benefit of continuous treatment after ASCT to enhance the immune recovery. Disclosures Ocio: Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Puig:The Binding Site: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Mateos:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Updated Outcomes and Impact of Age With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone or Melphalan, Prednisone, and Thalidomide in the Randomized, Phase III FIRST Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (30) ◽  
pp. 3609-3617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
Andrew Belch ◽  
Chaim Shustik ◽  
Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽  
Ulrich Dührsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
One To One

Purpose This analysis of the FIRST trial in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) ineligible for stem-cell transplantation examined updated outcomes and impact of patient age. Patients and Methods Patients with untreated symptomatic MM were randomly assigned at a one-to-one-to-one ratio to lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone until disease progression (Rd continuous), Rd for 72 weeks (18 cycles; Rd18), or melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT; 72 weeks), stratified by age (≤ 75 v > 75 years), disease stage (International Staging System stage I/II v III), and country. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Rd continuous and MPT were primary comparators. Results Between August 21, 2008, and March 7, 2011, 1,623 patients were enrolled (Rd continuous, n = 535; Rd18, n = 541; MPT, n = 547), including 567 (35%) age older than 75 years. Higher rates of advanced-stage disease and renal impairment were observed in patients older than 75 versus 75 years of age or younger. Rd continuous reduced the risk of progression or death compared with MPT by 31% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.80; P < .001) overall, 36% (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.77; P < .001) in patients age 75 years or younger, and 20% (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.03; P = .084) in those age older than 75 years. Median overall survival was longer with Rd continuous than with MPT, including a 14-month difference in patients age older than 75 years. Progression-free survival with Rd18 was similar to that with MPT, and overall survival with Rd18 was marginally inferior to that with Rd continuous. Rates of grade 3 to 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were similar for Rd continuous–treated patients age 75 years or older and those age older than 75 years; however, older patients had more frequent lenalidomide dose reductions. Conclusion Results support Rd continuous treatment as a new standard of care for stem-cell transplantation–ineligible patients with newly diagnosed MM of all ages.

Stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia in children

Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 1224-1231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Cwynarski ◽  
Irene A. G. Roberts ◽  
Simona Iacobelli ◽  
Anja van Biezen ◽  
Ronald Brand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Advanced Phase

Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is the only proven cure for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a rare disease in childhood. We report outcomes of 314 children with Philadelphia-chromosome–positive (Ph+) CML undergoing SCT from HLA-matched siblings (n = 182) or volunteer-unrelated donors (VUD; n = 132). Three-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) rates were 66% and 55% (n = 314). For 156 children in first chronic phase (CP1) who underwent transplantation from HLA-identical siblings, OS and LFS rates were 75% and 63%. For 97 children who underwent SCT in CP1 from VUD, 3-year OS and LFS rates were 65% and 56%, reflecting higher transplantation-related mortality (TRM) after VUD SCT (35% vs 20%; multivariate hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-3.5; P = .05). In a multivariate model for OS and LFS, outcomes were superior in CP1 than in advanced phase (AP/CP1) (OS HR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3-3; P = .001; LFS HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6; P = .003). For relapse, donor source (VUD/sibling) (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19-0.76; P = .006) and disease stage (AP/CP1) (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.36-4.3; P = .003) were significant. This is the first large series to show that SCT confers long-term LFS in most children with CML and helps assess alternative therapy, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in Adults: A Retrospective Study of the Chronic Malignancies and Inborn Errors Working Parties (CMWP and IEWP) of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3490-3490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafal Machowicz ◽  
Felipe Suarez ◽  
Wieslaw W Jedrzejczak ◽  
Dirk-Jan Eikema ◽  
Liesbeth C de Wreede ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Triggering Factor

Abstract Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH; hemophagocytic syndrome) is a rare syndrome of potentially fatal, uncontrolled hyperinflammation. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is indicated in familial, recurrent or progressive HLH. Additional recommendations include central nervous system involvement and unknown triggering factor. While data for alloSCT outcome are available for the pediatric setting, information for adults is very limited. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the information from the EBMT databases about adult HLH patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We obtained data of 67 adult (≥18 years of age) patients transplanted due to HLH. The first reported transplantation was in 1995. Due to the rise of HLH awareness, the number was steadily growing. Until 2006 only 12 transplants were performed, while in the next 10 years it was 55. Median age at transplantation was 28 (range: 18-65). There was a slight male predominance 43/67 (64%). The majority of patients were reported with secondary HLH 33/67 (49%), the familial disease was reported in 29/67 (43%) patients. In two patients triggering factor was attributed to malignancy. The majority of patients received stem cells obtained from the peripheral blood (52/67; 78%) while for the remaining ones it was bone marrow. Reduced intensity conditioning was used since 2004 in 23/63 (37%)of patients. Thirteen (19%) patients received TBI. Donor choice was: matched unrelated 33 (50%), mismatched unrelated 7 (11%), identical sibling 26 (39%). Engraftment was observed in 55/61 (77%); 7/61 (12%) patients suffered from primary and 2/61 (3%) from secondary graft failure. The cumulative incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) at 100 days was 26% (95% CI 15-37%). The cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD at 1 year after alloSCT was 13% (95% CI 2-23%) and increased to 31% at 3 years (95% CI 16-47%). The overall survival until three years is shown in Fig.1. The median survival time was 8 months. The three year OS was 41% (95% CI 28-55%). For patients who survived until 3 months, this proportion was more favorable with an OS of 62% (95% CI 45-78%) at 3 years after transplantation. Among 19 patients with observation times longer than 15 months, only one patient died (in the 48th month after alloSCT due to relapse which occurred in the 12th month). Main causes of death in the described group were: relapse or progression 10/36 (28%), infection 9/36 (25%) and GvHD 6/36 (17%). After 12 months no more relapses of HLH were recorded - the cumulative incidence reached 19%. The non-relapse mortality reached 42% after 15 months. The familial disease was associated with a better prognosis than secondary HLH (p=0.04). Unlike the pediatric population, where reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) was associated with higher survival, in adult patients there was no difference between the conditioning types. The choice of donor: matched related versus matched unrelated did not alter the survival. To our knowledge, this is the largest group of adult patients with HLH who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Relatively low relapse incidence shows that alloSCT can effectively cure HLH. Patients who survive the first period after this procedure can expect a long disease-free survival. Figure Overall survival after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for adult HLH patients until 36 months (95% Confidence Intervals are shown in grey). The number of patients at risk is indicated below the time axis at the corresponding time points. Figure. Overall survival after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for adult HLH patients until 36 months (95% Confidence Intervals are shown in grey). The number of patients at risk is indicated below the time axis at the corresponding time points. Disclosures Jedrzejczak: Celgene: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jansen-Cilag: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Angelini: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy. Kobbe:Jansen: Honoraria, Other: travel support; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding. Kroeger:Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document