Obesity and the Risk of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma – A Meta-Analysis Involving More Than 40,000 Cases

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 5089-5089
Author(s):  
Nishant Tageja ◽  
Ivo Ditah ◽  
Zartash Gul

Abstract Abstract 5089 Background – Obesity is linked with altered immune function and chronic inflammatory response; multiple studies have related autoimmune and chronic inflammatory processes with an increased risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, epidemiological studies on the relation between excess body weight and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma have yielded inconsistent results. The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between obesity, as measured by body mass index (BMI), and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies. Methods – We performed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases for studies on BMI and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that were published from 1966 to June 2010. Search terms included body mass index, BMI, or obesity combined with lymphoma. The reference lists of identified articles were manually reviewed to identify additional papers. Key Inclusion Criteria - cohort or case–control studies reporting NHL incidence or mortality as an outcome, BMI (body weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters) as the exposure of interest, and relative risks (RRs) or odds ratios with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as the outcome measures. Data Extraction and Statistical analysis - Two reviewers independently extracted study information and data. Where multiple outcome measures were reported, the most adjusted for was used. Before analysis, all studies were tested for publication bias using the Begg's and Egger's test. Pooled RRs with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random-effects meta-analysis model if heterogeneity was present; otherwise, the fixed-effects model was used. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata software, version 9.0 (Stata-Corp, College Station, TX). Results – Twenty-five studies (17 cohort and 8 case-control studies) with 40,279 participants met the inclusion criteria. Compared to individuals with BMI < 25.0 kg/m2, the summary RRs for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01–1.10) and 1.15 (95% CI, 1.06–1.25) for overweight (BMI between 25 and 30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI > 30.0 kg/m2) individuals respectively. By histological subtypes, obesity was associated with a statistically significant increase risk of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.11–1.37; n = 13 studies) but not with follicular lymphoma (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.97–1.27; n = 13 studies) or small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.84–1.07; n = 8 studies). There was no evidence of publication bias. Conclusions – The results of this meta-analysis suggest that compared to normal weight individuals, overweight and obese individuals have a 5% and 15% increased risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma respectively. Though statistically significant, these proportions are relatively small and perhaps may be accounted for by residual confounding. Larger, long term prospective studies will be needed to conclusively define the magnitude and strength of the association between body weight and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Disclosures: Off Label Use: High dose Melphalan is not FDA approved as conditioning regimen for Autologous stem cell transplant.

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling  Qin ◽  
Hui-Yang  Deng ◽  
Sheng-Jiang  Chen ◽  
Wei Wei

Background: Epidemiologic studies have suggested hair dye to be a risk factor for many cancers. However, previous studies on the association between the personal use of hair dye and risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) have been inconclusive. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, as well as the references cited in included studies, were searched for relevant studies up to February 10, 2015. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were applied to assess the strength of the association. Publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot by Egger’s and Begg’s tests. Results: A total of 16 studies were included in the analysis, including 13 case-control studies and 3 cohort studies. The present meta-analysis results revealed that the risk of NHL in a high population of hair dye users was 14% (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.29). Furthermore, individuals who used more than 20 pack-years of hair dye had increased risk of NHL. Conclusion: The outcomes indicate that hair dye use increases the risk of NHL, especially for females. Hence, people who frequently use hair dyes or have been using hair dyes for more than 20 years should minimize their exposure to hair dye products to prevent the risk of NHL.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3155-3155
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Fried ◽  
David E. Morris ◽  
Thomas C. Shea ◽  
Robert Z. Orlowski ◽  
Hendrik W. Van Deventer ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose/Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of chemotherapy alone compared to chemotherapy plus radiation in the management of adult early stage aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years were evaluated. Materials/Methods: Randomized trials published after 1990 comparing chemotherapy alone to chemotherapy plus radiation therapy in the management of adult aggressive NHL were identified through searches of MEDLINE and CANCERLIT databases. In addition, a search of ASTRO, ASCO, and ASH Proceedings from 1999 to the present was performed to identify updates of published articles and abstracts. Studies that were limited to GI sites only were excluded. Only studies employing CHOP or CHOP-like regimens and radiation therapy to a minimum dose of 30 Gy were deemed acceptable. Chemotherapy alone regimens had to consist of a minimum of 4 cycles of therapy. All trials reported OS and DFS at 5 years. A meta-analysis was performed using STATA statistical software, including tests for homogeneity and publication bias. Trials were analyzed by risk ratio (RR) method. Results: Five randomized trials (n = 1933, range for individual studies 215 to 647) were identified that met all inclusion criteria. The 5-yr OS and DFS RRs for the addition of radiation therapy to chemotherapy are presented in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. Three studies suggested an OS and DFS benefit with the addition of radiation to chemotherapy and two suggested an improved OS and DFS among patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Only two of the studies reported patterns of relapse (Aviles et al and Horning et al). These studies showed improved local control with combined modality therapy (16 – 23% vs. 4 – 5%). Risk ratios for OS ranged from 0.90 to 1.56. DFS estimates range from 0.89 to 1.82. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the overall treatment effects for this group of studies for both OS and DFS. Due to the high degree of heterogeneity among these trials (p-value for heterogeneity &lt;0.001 for both OS and DFS), summarizing these results with a pooled estimate of effect would be inappropriate. Heterogeneity was decreased only marginally with the exclusion of any individual study from the pooled estimate. Conclusions: It remains unclear whether early stage aggressive NHL patients benefit from the addition of radiation to CHOP-based chemotherapy. However, at this time we are not able to delineate those patients who will benefit from radiotherapy from those who will not. Currently CHOP-based chemotherapy plus radiation remains a standard of care in the US for early stage aggressive NHL. However, controversy remains regarding the role of radiation in light of conflicting results. Our ability to draw firm conclusions based on this review is limited due to the study heterogeneity. Differences among study populations may largely account for this heterogeneity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document