The Novel, Investigational NEDD8-Activating Enzyme Inhibitor MLN4924 In Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Grade Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): A Phase 1 Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 658-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronan T Swords ◽  
Harry P Erba ◽  
Daniel J DeAngelo ◽  
Peter G Smith ◽  
Michael D Pickard ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 658 Background: NEDD8-activating enzyme (NAE) regulates the NEDD8 conjugation pathway, and is required for the activity of the cullin-RING E3 ligases (CRLs). CRLs control the timed degradation of several substrates involved in cell-cycle regulation, signal transduction, DNA replication, and stress response, including proteins important for the survival of AML cells. We evaluated the preclinical anti-leukemic activity of MLN4924, a novel, investigational, first-in-class small molecule inhibitor of NAE, and based on the activity of MLN4924 in preclinical AML models (Swords RT et al, Blood 2010) we conducted a phase 1 study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of this agent in patients with AML and advanced MDS. Methods: The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of MLN4924, to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of MLN4924 in patients with AML and high-grade MDS. Secondary objectives included a preliminary assessment of efficacy, and analysis of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (via NAE-regulated proteins in peripheral blood mononuclear cells). Patients aged ≥18 years, with ECOG performance status 0–2, who had AML or high-grade MDS, and who were not candidates for potentially curative therapy, were eligible. MLN4924 was administered as a 60-minute IV infusion on days 1, 3, and 5 of a 21-day cycle for up to 12 months or until documented disease progression. Dose escalation was commenced at 25 mg/m2 and proceeded using a standard 3+3′ escalation method until the MTD was established. Response assessment was based on recently published guidelines (Döhner H et al, Blood 2010) and adverse events (AEs) were graded per National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (NCI Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, 2006). Results: To date, 15 patients (9 males, 6 females; 14 AML, 1 high-grade MDS) have been enrolled and treated, including 3, 4, 3, 3, and 2 at dose levels of 25, 33, 44, 59, and 78 mg/m2, respectively. Median age was 62.3 years (range 29.3–84.0 years). By cytogenetics, 1 (7%), 5 (33%), and 7 (47%) patients had good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk disease (not available in 2). Prior antineoplastic therapies included cytarabine (n=7), azacitidine, daunorubicin (n=3 each), decitabine, etoposide, gemtuzumab, idarubicin, and mitoxantrone (n=2 each). To date, 3 patients have received ≥8 cycles; 6 remain on treatment. Two dose-limiting toxicities have been reported at the 78 mg/m2 dose level: one patient with multi-organ failure in Cycle 2, and one with reversible elevation of alanine aminotransferase in Cycle 1. The most common AEs were pneumonia (n=6), atelectasis, constipation, diarrhea, and febrile neutropenia (each n=4); most common grade ≥3 AEs were febrile neutropenia (n=4), elevated aspartate aminotransferase, and pneumonia (each n=3). Three patients have achieved a complete response (CR) to date. A 29-year-old woman with relapsed AML following allogeneic stem cell transplantation achieved a CR after cycle 1 at 25 mg/m2 before developing progressive disease at an extramedullary site during cycle 8. An 82-year-old man with history of high-risk MDS, which was unresponsive to azacitidine, that evolved into AML had a partial response in cycle 8 and a CR with incomplete recovery of blood counts (CRi) in cycle 10 at 33 mg/m2; the patient is currently in cycle 12 and has become transfusion-independent. A 71-year-old man with de-novo AML refractory to standard cytarabine plus daunorubicin induction achieved a CRi during cycle 1 at 44 mg/m2; although this was not maintained, the patient continued to benefit from treatment and is currently in cycle 11 with reduced transfusion dependence. Pharmacodynamic data are available for 9 patients; 7 show evidence of target inhibition in peripheral blood by changes in NAE-regulated proteins. Conclusion: The preliminary findings of this study indicate that the novel mechanism of action of MLN4924 through NAE inhibition results in observed activity in patients with relapsed or refractory AML, and suggest the successful translation of preclinical research in AML models into the clinic. Enrollment continues in expanded cohorts of AML and MDS patients at 59 mg/m2. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented, together with data on MLN4924 pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Investigational agent in clinical development for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. Erba:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. DeAngelo:Deminimus: Consultancy. Smith:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Pickard:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Dezube:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Giles:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Medeiros:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhavana Bhatnagar ◽  
Qiuhong Zhao ◽  
Alice S. Mims ◽  
Sumithira Vasu ◽  
Gregory K. Behbehani ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1364-1364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna B. Halpern ◽  
Megan Othus ◽  
Kelda Gardner ◽  
Genevieve Alcorn ◽  
Mary-Elizabeth M. Percival ◽  
...  

Background: Optimal treatment for medically less fit adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains uncertain. Retrospective data suggest intensive therapy may lead to better outcomes in these patients. However, these findings must be interpreted cautiously because of the possibility of selection bias and other confounders. Ideally, the optimal treatment intensity is defined via randomized trial but whether patients and their physicians are amenable to such a study is unknown. We therefore designed a trial (NCT03012672) to 1) evaluate the feasibility of randomization between intensive and non-intensive therapy in this population and 2) examine the impact of treatment intensity on response rate and survival. We used CLAG-M as high-dose cytarabine-based intensive induction therapy. Rather than selecting different classes of drugs in the 2 treatment arms- which may have different modes of action and therefore confound the question of treatment intensity - we used reduced-dose ("mini") CLAG-M as the non-intensive comparator. Methods: Adults ≥18 years were eligible if they had untreated AML or high-grade myeloid neoplasms (≥10% blasts in blood or marrow) and were medically less fit as defined by having a "treatment related mortality" (TRM) score of ≥13.1, corresponding to a >10-15% 28-day mortality with intensive chemotherapy. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% was the only organ function exclusion. Patient-physician pairs were first asked if they were amenable to randomized treatment allocation. If so, they were randomized 1:1 to mini- vs. regular-dose CLAG-M. If not, in order to evaluate our secondary endpoints, the patient or physician could choose the treatment arm and still enroll on study. Patients and physicians then completed surveys elucidating their decision-making processes. Up to 2 induction courses were given with mini- vs. regular-dose CLAG-M: cladribine 2 or 5 mg/m2/day (days 1-5), cytarabine 100 or 2,000 mg/m2/day (days 1-5), G-CSF 300 or 480µcg/day for weight </≥76kg in both arms (days 0-5), and mitoxantrone 6 or 18 mg/m2/day (days 1-3). CLAG at identical doses was used for post-remission therapy for up to 4 (regular-dose CLAG) or 12 (mini-CLAG) cycles. The primary endpoint was feasibility of randomization, defined as ≥26/50 of patient-physician pairs agreeing to randomization. Secondary outcomes included rate of complete remission (CR) negative for measurable ("minimal") residual disease (MRD), rate of CR plus CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CR+CRi), and overall survival (OS). Results: This trial enrolled 33 patients. Only 3 (9%) patient/physician pairs agreed to randomization and thus randomization was deemed infeasible (primary endpoint). Eighteen pairs chose mini-CLAG-M and 12 regular-dose CLAG-M for a total of 19 subjects in the lower dose and 14 subjects in the higher dose arms. The decision favoring lower dose treatment was made largely by the physician in 5/18 (28%) cases, the patient in 11/18 (61%) cases and both in 2/18 (11%). The decision favoring the higher dose arm was made by the patient in most cases 9/12 (75%), both physician and patient in 2/12 (16%) and the physician in only 1/12 (8%) cases. Despite the limitations of lack of randomization, patients' baseline characteristics were well balanced with regard to age, performance status, TRM score, lab values and cytogenetic/mutational risk categories (Table 1). One patient was not yet evaluable for response or TRM at data cutoff. Rates of MRDneg CR were comparable: 6/19 (32%) in the lower and 3/14 (21%) in the higher dose groups (p=0.70). CR+CRi rates were also similar in both arms (43% vs. 56% in lower vs. higher dose arms; p=0.47). Three (16%) patients experienced early death in the lower dose arm vs. 1 (7%) in the higher dose arm (p=0.43). With a median follow up of 4.2 months, there was no survival difference between the two groups (median OS of 6.1 months in the lower vs. 4.7 months in the higher dose arm; p=0.81; Figure 1). Conclusions: Randomization of medically unfit patients to lower- vs. higher-intensity therapy was not feasible, and physicians rarely chose higher intensity therapy in this patient group. Acknowledging the limitation of short follow-up time and small sample size, our trial did not identify significant differences in outcomes between intensive and non-intensive chemotherapy. Analysis of differences in QOL and healthcare resource utilization between groups is ongoing. Disclosures Halpern: Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bayer Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Othus:Celgene: Other: Data Safety and Monitoring Committee. Gardner:Abbvie: Speakers Bureau. Percival:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Nohla Therapeutics: Research Funding. Scott:Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Becker:AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glycomimetics, Invivoscribe, JW Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Trovagene: Research Funding; Accordant Health Services/Caremark: Consultancy; The France Foundation: Honoraria. Oehler:Pfizer Inc.: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy. Walter:BioLineRx: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Argenx BVBA: Consultancy; BiVictriX: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Amphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy; Covagen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Race Oncology: Consultancy; Aptevo Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; New Link Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Cladribine is FDA-approved for Hairy Cell Leukemia. Here we describe its use for AML, where is is also widely used with prior publications supporting its use


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk E. Cahill ◽  
Yasmin H. Karimi ◽  
Theodore G. Karrison ◽  
Nitin Jain ◽  
Margaret Green ◽  
...  

Abstract In this phase 1 study, azacitidine (AZA) was given before high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) and mitoxantrone (mito) based on the hypothesis that epigenetic priming with a hypomethylating agent before cytotoxic chemotherapy would improve response rates in patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML), including relapsed/refractory disease. The primary objective was to establish the recommended phase 2 dose of AZA given before standard HiDAC/mito. In a dose escalation scheme, 46 patients (median age, 66 years) received AZA at 37.5, 50, or 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously or IV once daily on days 1 to 5 followed by HiDAC (3000 mg/m2) and mitoxantrone (30 mg/m2) once each on days 6 and 10 (the HiDAC/mito dose was reduced 33% in elderly subjects). Two dose-limiting toxicities occurred (both in the same patient): acute liver failure and kidney injury at the 50 mg/m2 dose. The 30-day induction death rate was 2.2% (1 of 46). The overall response rate, including complete remission and complete remission with incomplete count recovery, was 61% (28 of 46). Previously untreated patients aged ≥60 years with therapy-related AML and de novo AML were more likely to respond than untreated patients with AML progressing from an antecedent hematologic disorder (myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia). Patients with favorable European Leukemia Network risk (P = .008), NPM1 mutations (P = .007), or IDH2 mutations (P = .03) were more likely to respond, and those with TP53 mutations (P = .03) were less likely to respond. The recommended phase 2 dose of AZA is 75 mg/m2 per day on days 1 to 5 followed by HiDAC (3000 mg/m2) and mitoxantrone (30 mg/m2) once each on days 6 and 10. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01839240.


2017 ◽  
Vol 92 (7) ◽  
pp. 660-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Michael W. Schuster ◽  
Nitin Jain ◽  
Anjali Advani ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7030-7030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olatoyosi Odenike ◽  
Johannes E. Wolff ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Ibrahim Taha Aldoss ◽  
David Rizzieri ◽  
...  

7030 Background: Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins bind to acetyllysines and upregulate oncogenic target genes. Mivebresib (ABBV-075) is a pan-BET inhibitor with antitumor activity in vitro and xenograft models of AML. This 2-part phase 1 study evaluates the safety and pharmacokinetics of mivebresib at monotherapy or combination dosing schedules in patients with solid tumors (part 1) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML; part 2) (NCT02391480). Here, we report preliminary data from part 2 in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) AML. Methods: Mivebresib monotherapy (MIV-mono), or combined with venetoclax (MIV-VEN), were administered daily to adult patients with AML. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) period was 28 d. Results: As of Dec 2018, 41 patients (median age: 69 y [range, 29–84]; 19 patients had > 2 prior therapies) were enrolled: 19 in MIV-mono (5 of whom switched to MIV-combo) and 22 who began treatment in MIV-VEN cohorts. 23 patients had high cytogenetic risk. Median time on treatment was 28 d (range, 8–562). There were no DLTs. All patients experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (AE), most commonly (≥40% patient incidence), fatigue (56%), dysgeusia (46%), decreased appetite (44%), diarrhoea (42%), nausea (42%), vomiting (42%). 40 patients had grade ≥3 AEs (febrile neutropenia (37%), anemia (34%) and thrombocytopenia (32%). 33 patients had serious AEs, most commonly febrile neutropenia (19%). 25 deaths were reported; 15 patients died of causes unrelated to mivebresib and 10 patients due to AML progression. The median best % bone marrow blast change for 26 evaluable patients was -20% (range, -98% to +300%). Gene expression analysis in pre- and post-treatment peripheral blood samples showed that HEXIM1, DCXR and CD93 genes were reliable PD biomarkers of ABBV-075 which were consistently modulated in a dose-dependent manner. At the cutoff date, median overall survival for all patients was 2.6 m. Conclusions: Mivebresib was well tolerated and showed antileukemic effects in patients with RR AML. Clinical trial information: NCT02391480.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 986-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Fiedler ◽  
Hubert Serve ◽  
Hartmut Döhner ◽  
Michael Schwittay ◽  
Oliver G. Ottmann ◽  
...  

AbstractFifteen patients with refractory AML were treated in a phase 1 study with SU11248, an oral kinase inhibitor of fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (Flt3), Kit, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptors. Separate cohorts of patients received SU11248 for 4-week cycles followed by either a 2- or a 1-week rest period. At the starting dose level of 50 mg (n = 13), no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The most frequent grade 2 toxicities were edema, fatigue, and oral ulcerations. Two fatal bleedings possibly related to the disease, one from a concomitant lung cancer and one cerebral bleeding, were observed. At the 75 mg dose level (n = 2), one case each of grade 4 fatigue, hypertension, and cardiac failure was observed, and this dose level was abandoned. All patients with FLT3 mutations (n = 4) had morphologic or partial responses compared with 2 of 10 evaluable patients with wild-type FLT3. Responses, although longer in patients with mutated FLT3, were of short duration. Reductions of cellularity and numbers of Ki-67+, phospho-Kit+, phospho–kinase domain–containing receptor–positive (phospho-KDR+), phospho–signal transducer and activator of transcription 5–positive (phospho-STAT5+), and phospho-Akt+ cells were detected in bone marrow histology analysis. In summary, monotherapy with SU11248 induced partial remissions of short duration in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Further evaluation of this compound, for example in combination with chemotherapy, is warranted.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 11-12
Author(s):  
Justin M. Watts ◽  
Tara Lin ◽  
Eunice S. Wang ◽  
Alice S. Mims ◽  
Elizabeth H. Cull ◽  
...  

Introduction Immunotherapy offers the promise of a new paradigm for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). CD123, the IL-3 receptor alpha-chain, represents an attractive target for antibody therapies because of its high expression on AML/MDS blasts and leukemic stem cells compared to normal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. APVO436, a novel bispecific anti-CD123 x anti-CD3 ADAPTIR™ molecule, depleted CD123+ cells in AML patient samples ex vivo (Godwin et al. ASH 2017), reduced leukemia engraftment in a systemic AML xenograft model (Comeau et al. AACR 2018), and transiently reduced peripheral CD123+ cells in non-human primates with minimal cytokine release and in a dose-dependent fashion (Comeau et al. AACR 2019). These data provide a basis for the clinical application of APVO436 as a treatment in AML and MDS. Here, we report preliminary data from a first-in-human dose-escalation study of APVO436 in patients with R/R AML and high-risk MDS. Study Design/Methods This ongoing Phase 1/1b study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03647800) was initiated to determine the safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of APVO436 as a single agent. Major inclusion criteria were: R/R AML with no other standard treatment option available, R/R MDS with > 5% marrow blasts or any peripheral blasts and failure of a hypomethylating agent, ECOG performance status ≤ 2, life expectancy > 2 months, white blood cells ≤ 25,000 cells/mm3, creatinine ≤ 2 x upper limit of normal (ULN), INR and PTT < 1.5 x ULN and alanine aminotransferase < 3 x ULN. Patients were not restricted from treatment due to cytogenetic or mutational status. Intravenous doses of APVO436 were administered weekly for up to six 28-day cycles (24 doses) with the option to continue dosing for up to 36 total cycles (144 doses). Flat and step dosing regimens were escalated using a safety-driven modified 3 + 3 design. Pre-medication with diphenhydramine, acetaminophen, and dexamethasone was administered starting with dose 1 to mitigate infusion related reactions (IRR) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). First doses and increasing step doses of APVO436 were infused over 20-24 hours followed by an observation period of 24 hours or more. Bone marrow biopsies were performed every other cycle with responses assessed by European Leukemia Net 2017 criteria for AML or International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria for MDS. Results The data cut-off for this interim analysis was July 9, 2020. Twenty-eight patients with primary R/R AML (n=19), therapy-related R/R AML (n=3), or high-risk MDS (n=6) have been enrolled and received a cumulative total of 186 doses. The number of doses received per patient ranged from 1 to 43 (mean of 6.4 doses). Most patients discontinued treatment due to progressive disease; however, blast reduction was achieved in 2 patients, with one patient with MDS maintaining a durable response for 11 cycles before progressing. APVO436 was tolerated across all dose regimens in all cohorts tested. The most common adverse events (AEs), regardless of causality, were edema (32%), diarrhea (29%), febrile neutropenia (29%), fever (25%), hypokalemia (25%), IRR (21%), CRS (18%), chills (18%), and fatigue (18%). AEs ≥ Grade 3 occurring in more than one patient were: febrile neutropenia (25%), anemia (18%), hyperglycemia (14%), decreased platelet count (11%), CRS (11%), IRR (7%), and hypertension (7%). After observing a single dose limiting toxicity (DLT) at a flat dose of 9 µg, step dosing was implemented and no DLTs have been observed thereafter. No treatment-related anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were observed. Transient serum cytokine elevations occurred after several reported IRR and CRS events, with IL-6 most consistently elevated. Conclusions Preliminary results indicate that APVO436 is tolerated in patients with R/R AML and MDS at the doses and schedules tested to date, with a manageable safety profile. Dose escalation continues and the results will be updated for this ongoing study. Disclosures Watts: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rafael Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lin:Ono Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Bio-Path Holdings: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Aptevo: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genetech-Roche: Research Funding; Celyad: Research Funding; Prescient Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mateon Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Trovagene: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Wang:Abbvie: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol Meyers Squibb (Celgene): Consultancy; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Stemline: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Mims:Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other: Senior Medical Director for Beat AML Study; Syndax Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Data Safety Monitoring Board; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cull:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Patel:Agios: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; DAVA Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; France Foundation: Honoraria. Shami:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Walter:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding. Cogle:Aptevo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chenault:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Macpherson:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Chunyk:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. McMahan:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Gross:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Stromatt:Aptevo Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. S220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney D. DiNardo ◽  
Gail J. Roboz ◽  
Eytan M. Stein ◽  
Stéphane de Botton ◽  
Alice S. Mims ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document