B Cell Lymphoma In Association with Multiple Myeloma: Analysis of the Biologic Relationship
Abstract Abstract 1590 Background: The occurrence of a secondary lymphoma in patients with a prior history of B-cell lymphomas has been reported.1, 2 There are few reported occurrences of Multiple Myeloma (MM) in patients (pts) with a prior history of lymphoma and the biologic relationship between the two neoplasms in such cases is unknown. Methods: We queried our IRB approved clinicopathologic database of hematologic malignancies for patients with lymphoma and MM. Of the 4165 pts with B-cell lymphoma and 804 pts with MM, 6 pts with a history of B-cell lymphoma developed MM and 1 patient with a prior history of MM developed a B-cell lymphoma. We describe the morphology, immunophenotype, and clinical features of the 7 pts. The clonal relationship of the 2 components was analyzed using sequencing analysis of immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IgVH) genes and by light chain restriction. Results: There were 5 men and 2 women (median age of diagnosis of lymphoma, 65 years; median age of diagnosis of MM, 71 years). The pts with lymphoma included 2 pts with diffuse large B cell lymphoma, 2 pts with small lymphocytic lymphoma, 2 pts with follicular lymphoma and 1 patient with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. The development of MM was metachronous in 5 cases, following B-cell lymphoma by 3 years to 23 years and synchronous in 1 case. In 1 patient, the B-cell lymphoma developed 6 years after the diagnosis of MM. 6 pts achieved complete remission after treatment for lymphoma and 1 patient is ongoing treatment. 6 of the 7 pts required treatment for MM soon after diagnosis. 1 patient has smoldering MM and continues to be observed 57 months after diagnosis. FISH analysis indicated IgH rearrangement in 3 pts with MM; 1 patient with 17p deletion and monosomy 13; 3 pts had normal FISH and metaphase cytogenetics. In 3 pts, both neoplasms were kappa light chain restricted; in 1 patient both were lambda restricted; in 1 patient, the lymphoma was lambda light chain restricted while the MM was kappa light chain restricted and the reverse in another pt; in 1 patient the B-cell lymphoma was light chain negative and the MM was kappa restricted. IgVH rearrangement studies in 4 patients in whom tissue samples were available indicated that the two were clonally unrelated in 3 patients and related in only 1 patient. Conclusion: Clonality analysis of rearranged immunoglobulin genes from patients with both B-cell lymphoma and MM provide evidence of separate clonal origins of the two tumors in the majority of cases, thus excluding secondary transformation of the original B-cell clone. The presence or absence of a genetic predisposition to the development of multiple B cell malignancies requires further study.3 Disclosures: Off Label Use: The combination of lenalidomide and everolimue is an off label use in multiple myeloma. Abramson:Genentech: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Raje:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Research Funding.
Impact of Interim FDG-PET (iPET) in the Outcomes of Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Receiving DA-EPOCH-R
Introduction: 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) remains the standard of care for baseline and end of treatment scans for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, the role of interim FDG-PET remains not as well defined across aggressive NHLs, especially in the era of high-intensity chemoimmunotherapy. Interim FDG-PET (iPET) can serve as an early prognostic tool, and prior studies evaluating the utility of iPET-guided treatment strategies primarily focused on diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and frontline R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Classification criteria systems assessing response also differ between studies with no clear consensus between use of Deauville criteria (DC), International Harmonization Project (IHP), and the ΔSUVmax method. Methods: This study evaluates our institutional experience with iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin with or without Rituximab) in aggressive NHLs. We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who started on DA-EPOCH ± R between 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2018 for aggressive NHLs. Response on interim and end-of-treatment (EOT) scans were graded per DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods, and progression free survival (PFS) probability estimates were calculated with chi-square testing and Kaplan Meier method. PFS outcomes were compared between interim negative and positive scans based on each scoring method. Outcomes were also compared between groups based on interim versus EOT positive or negative scans. Results: We identified 70 patients with aggressive NHLs who received DA-EPOCH ± R at our institute. The most common diagnoses were DLBCL (61%) followed by Burkitt's lymphoma (10%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (9%), plasmablastic lymphoma (7%), gray zone lymphoma (6%), primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma (1%), primary effusion lymphoma (1%), and other high-grade NHL not otherwise specified (3%). Of the 43 patients with DLBCL, 21/43 (49%) had double hit lymphoma (DHL) while 7/43 (16%) had triple hit lymphoma (THL), and 3/43 (7%) had MYC-rearranged DLBCL while 2/43 (5%) had double expressor DLBCL. Thirty nine out of 70 (56%) were female, and median age at diagnosis was 58.39 years (range 22.99 - 86.86 years). Most patients had stage IV disease (49/70, 70%), and 43/70 (61%) had more than one extranodal site while 45/70 (64%) had IPI score ≥ 3. Forty-six out of 70 (66%) received central nervous system prophylaxis, most with intrathecal chemotherapy (44/70, 63%). Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) had iPET available while 6/70 (9%) had interim computerized tomography (CT) scans. Fifty-six out of 70 (80%) had EOT PET, and 4/70 (6%) had EOT CT scans. Sustained complete remission occurred in 46/70 (66%) after frontline DA-EPOCH ± R (CR1), and 12/70 (17%) were primary refractory while 5/70 (7%) had relapse after CR1. Four of 70 (6%) died before cycle 3, and 3/70 (4%) did not have long-term follow-up due to transition of care elsewhere. Median follow-up was 15.29 months (range 0.85 - 60.09 months). There was significantly better PFS observed if iPET showed DC 1-3 compared to DC 4-5 (Χ2=5.707, p=0.0169), and PFS was better if iPET was negative by IHP criteria (Χ2=4.254, p=0.0392) or ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=6.411, p=0.0113). Comparing iPET to EOT PET, there was significantly better PFS if iPET was negative with EOT PET negative (iPET-/EOT-) compared to iPET positive with EOT negative (iPET+/EOT-), and iPET+/EOT+ and iPET-/EOT+ had worse PFS after iPET-/EOT- and iPET+/EOT- respectively. This pattern in iPET/EOT PFS probability remained consistent when comparing DC (Χ2=30.041, p<0.0001), IHP (Χ2=49.078, p<0.0001), and ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=9.126, p=0.0104). These findings fit clinical expectations with positive EOT scans indicating primary refractory disease. There was no significant difference in PFS when comparing DLBCL versus non-DLBCL (Χ2=3.461, p=0.0628) or DHL/THL versus non-DHL/THL diagnoses (Χ2=2.850, p=0.0914). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a prognostic role of iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R for aggressive NHLs. Significant differences in PFS were seen when graded by DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods used in prior studies and when comparing interim versus EOT response. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Disclosures Bello: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Chavez:Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Introduction: CNS relapse of DLBCL is associated with poor prognosis. Estimated incidence varies between 1.9 and 8.4%1. The CNS-International prognostic index (IPI)2 help risk stratify and estimate the 2-year risk of CNS relapse in DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy. CNS prophylaxis is indicated in patients with a high risk of CNS relapse (a score of ≥4 equated to a 10.2% risk). High-risk DLBCL patients outside the CNS-IPI system include double/triple-hit (MYC/BCL-2/BCL-6 translocations) lymphoma, HIV lymphoma, testicular lymphoma, primary cutaneous lymphoma-leg type, stage IE breast lymphoma3. IT methotrexate or cytarabine administered during the course of systemic chemotherapy has been the most widely employed method of CNS prophylaxis but there is paucity of data validating its efficacy. Aim: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the CNS relapse rates in DLBCL patients who received CNS prophylaxis. Patients and Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective observational study conducted in a district general hospital. Data was extracted from the regional (Dorset Cancer Network) DLBCL database and laboratory reports for CSF analysis at the time of the first intrathecal chemotherapy. Medical records of patients with DLBCL who received CNS prophylaxis were evaluated for the following patient-related and disease-related demographics: age at diagnosis, gender, stage, systemic treatment, CNS prophylaxis, treatment response, remission duration, systemic relapse rates, CNS relapse rates and survival. CNS-IPI scores were retrospectively calculated and additional indications evaluated for patients who received CNS prophylaxis. Results: Between 2013 and 2018, 178 patients were diagnosed with DLBCL. All patients were treated with RCHOP chemo-immunotherapy. CNS prophylaxis was administered in 47 (26%) patients. Median age was 69 years (range 20-86 years) and 62% were males. All 47 patients (100%) received IT methotrexate as CNS prophylaxis, with 43 (91%) receiving all of the planned 4 doses of IT methotrexate 12.5 mg each. A CNS-IPI score of ³4 was present in 31 (66%) patients, and a score of 2-3 in 9 (19%) patients. Additional risk factors identified included testicular lymphoma in 3 patients, breast lymphoma in 2 patients and oropharyngeal lymphoma in 2 patients. Ten (21%) patients received their treatment at the outset with courses 1-4 of R-CHOP. Of the 47 patients who received CNS prophylaxis, 5 (10%) relapsed; all had isolated CNS lymphoma at relapse. Median time to CNS relapse was 25 months (range 12-36 months) from initial diagnosis of DLBCL. Median survival after CNS relapse was 5 months (range 2-9 months). Of the remaining 141 patients, 2 patients relapsed with isolated CNS lymphoma. Conclusion: Although the overall incidence was low (4%), CNS relapse was observed in 10% of high-risk patients all of whom received CNS prophylaxis with IT methotrexate. The efficacy of CNS prophylaxis with IT chemotherapy remains unproven. There is no randomised study to show that IT prophylaxis alone is effective. Current British guidelines recommend high-dose intravenous methotrexate over IT methotrexate if patient's physiological fitness and renal function are acceptable4. The median age in our cohort was 69 years which makes it challenging to deliver dose-intensive systemic therapy concurrently with intravenous high-dose methotrexate. The role of CNS prophylaxis in high-risk patients including its efficacy and safety in older patients need further evaluation in prospective randomised studies. References Eyre T et al.Efficacy of central nervous system prophylaxis with stand-alone intrathecal chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the rituximab era: a systematic review. Hematologica. 2019;105(7):1914-1924.Norbert Schmitz et al.CNS International prognostic Index: A risk model for CNS relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOPJ Clin Oncol 2016; 34:3150-3156.Andrew D Zelenetz et al.National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines: B-Cell Lymphomas.Version 2.2020.Pamela McKay et al.The prevention of central nervous system relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a British Society for Haematology good practice paper. Onlinelibrary.wiley.com. 2020. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjh.16866 Disclosures Hall: Janssen:Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored for educational meetings;Karyopharm:Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored for educational meetings;Takeda:Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored for educational meetings;Celgene:Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: sponsored for educational meetings.Killick:Celgene:Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending educational meetings;Jazz Pharmaceuticals:Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending educational meetings;Novartis:Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support for attending educational meetings;Gilead:Honoraria, Other: Support for attending education meetings.McCarthy:Janssen:Honoraria;Abbvie:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.Walewska:AbbVie:Other: sponsored for educational meetings, Speakers Bureau;Janssen:Other: sponsored for educational meetings, Speakers Bureau;Gilead:Speakers Bureau;Astra Zeneca:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.Chacko:Astellas:Honoraria;Daiichi-Sankyo:Honoraria;Novartis:Honoraria, Other: Travel Grants;Gilead:Other: Travel grants;Jazz Pharmaceuticals:Other: Travel grants;Celgene:Other: Travel grants.
Introduction Part B of the modified Magrath regimen (ifosfamide, etoposide, and cytarabine; IVAC) with or without rituximab (R) is utilized as a standalone regimen in the management of relapsed/refractory Burkitt lymphoma and other non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). There are no comparative or prospective data and a paucity of retrospective, non-comparative data to support use of this regimen. A small retrospective study described second-line IVAC use without R in a mixed cohort of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or peripheral T-cell lymphoma, suggesting utility as a bridge to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) (Pereira J, et al. Leuk Res. 2006 Jun;30(6):681-5). The activity of this regimen in B-cell NHL, particularly in conjunction with R, and its toxicity remain incompletely described. In this study, we describe our institutional experience with IVAC +/- R in relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL. Methods We reviewed all patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL treated with IVAC +/- R between 1 January 2004 and 30 September 2019 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center to assess efficacy and toxicity. Patients who received IVAC as part of sequential or alternating chemotherapy were excluded. Standard dosing consisted of ifosfamide 1500mg/m2 IV over 60min days 1-5, etoposide 60mg/m2 IV over 60min days 1-5, cytarabine 2000mg/m2 IV over 3 hours every 12 hours days 1-2, with or without rituximab 375mg/m2 IV day 0 or 1 in 21- to 28-day cycles (Lacasce A, et al. Leuk Lymphoma. 2004 Apr;45(4):761-7). Results Cohort and treatment characteristics are described in Table 1. Among 54 eligible patients (median age 51 years), 76% had DLBCL; 30% had lymphomatous central nervous system involvement at the time of initiating IVAC. Patients had received median 2 prior lines of therapy, with the last dose of the most recent line of therapy administered a median of 3 weeks prior to initiating IVAC. Patients received median 2 cycles of IVAC +/- R; 48% received IVAC-R. Prophylactic antimicrobials with cycle 1 were utilized in 94%. Most patients received herpesvirus- (81%) and Pneumocystis- (80%) directed prophylaxis; broad-spectrum prophylaxis with a fluoroquinolone was less common (24%). Primary granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) was utilized in 93% of patients with cycle 1; primary or secondary GCSF was utilized in 94% of cycles. Efficacy outcomes are described in Table 1. Objective response rate (ORR) among 46 evaluated patients was 48%; 17% achieved CR. ORR did not vary significantly between patients who did or did not receive R (58% vs 42%; p = 0.5) but was associated with number of IVAC cycles administered (among responders, 69% received 3-4 cycles while 31% received 1-2 cycles; p < 0.001). At median follow-up of 22 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.1 months and 4.9 months, respectively (Figure). In Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of survival, patients who received R with every cycle (p = 0.025) and received 3 or more cycles (p < 0.001) experienced significantly longer PFS. Patients who achieved CR (p < 0.001) or PR (p = 0.003), received R with every cycle (p < 0.001), received 3 or more cycles (p < 0.001), or underwent subsequent HCT or CAR-T cell therapy (p = 0.001) experienced significantly longer OS. Toxicity outcomes are described in Table 2. Grade ≥ 3 anemia (93%), neutropenia (94%), and thrombocytopenia (100%; all grade 4) were common, regardless of number of cycles received. Febrile neutropenia (FN) occurred in 65% of patients and complicated 47% of cycles; documented infection occurred in 44%. Risk of FN and infection did not appear to be influenced by use of antimicrobial or GCSF prophylaxis. Grade ≥ 3 elevations in AST/ALT or total bilirubin were uncommon (5.6% and 9.3%, respectively). Neurotoxicity attributed to cytarabine or ifosfamide occurred in 17% of patients and was usually low-grade; hemorrhagic cystitis occurred in one patient. In patients for whom cause of death was documented (n = 37), mortality was attributed to a treatment-related complication in 19%. Conclusion IVAC-R may be a useful bridging therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL who are planned for HCT. However, its potential for profound hematologic toxicity and life-threatening complications despite prophylactic measures requires careful consideration of less toxic alternatives. Disclosures Straus: Elsevier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: CME writer; Targeted Oncology: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Imedex, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; NY Lymphoma Rounds: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; OncLive: Speakers Bureau; ASH: Other: Conference in December 2019 on HL to other physicians during ASH; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Abstract Background SAR3419 is a humanized anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to maytansin DM4, a potent cytotoxic agent. SAR3419 targets CD19, an antigen expressed in the majority of B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL). The recommended dose for single agent SAR3419 was previously determined to be 55 mg/m2 administered IV every week for 4 weeks, then bi-weekly. In phase I, clinical activity was shown mainly in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). (Trial funded by Sanofi). Methods Patients (pts) with a CD20+ and CD19+ DLBCL relapsing or refractory (R/R) after at least 1 standard treatment including rituximab and not candidate for or who already underwent transplantation, were eligible. Refractory disease was defined as unresponsive to or progressing within 6 months of regimen completion. Fresh (or recent formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded) biopsy was required before SAR3419 start. Pts received 375 mg/m2 of rituximab (R) IV and 55 mg/m² of SAR3419 on day 1, 8, 15, 22 (35-day cycle 1), followed by bi-weekly R and SAR3419 at the same doses for 2 additional 28-day cycles, provided there was no disease progression or other study discontinuation criteria met. The primary objective was the overall response rate (ORR) following Cheson 2007 criteria, with the first tumor assessment being done 42 days after the last study treatment administration. Secondary objectives were: safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), duration of response (DOR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and correlation of the antitumor and biological activity of the combination with tumor biomarker status. Results Fifty-three pts were enrolled, 52 treated. Median age was 66.5 years (range 38-85), 50% were male; 23%, 33% and 40% of patients had received 1, 2 or ≥3 prior chemo/immunotherapy regimens for DLBCL, respectively. Of the enrolled patients, 3.8% had received no prior regimen for DLBCL and therefore were excluded from primary analysis for efficacy. Seventy-three percent had stage III/IV disease, 59% had elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and 63% had bulky disease. Sixty percent were refractory to first regimen (primary refractory), 16% were refractory to last regimen and 24% were relapsed pts. The ORR in the per-protocol population (n=45) was 31.1% (80% confidence interval (CI): 22.0% to 41.6%). Among the 14 responders, 5 had progressed at the time of analysis, with duration of response beyond 6 months for 3 of them. The ORR was 58.3% (80% CI: 36.2% to 78.1%) for patients with relapsed DLBCL (n=12), 42.9% (80% CI: 17.0% to 72.1%) for pts refractory to last regimen (n=7) and 15.4% (80% CI: 6.9% to 28.4%) for primary refractory pts (n=26). Overall survival and PFS data are not yet mature. Biomarkers and PK data will be presented at the meeting. The most common (≥10%) all grades non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were asthenia (25.0%), nausea (21.2%), cough (19.2%), diarrhea (17.3%), weight decrease (17.3%), vomiting (15.4%), dyspnea (15.4%), abdominal pain (13.5%), back pain (13.5%), pyrexia (13.5%) and constipation (11.5%). Related grade 3-4 TEAEs were: 1 syncope, 1 bronchospasm, 2 neutropenia and 1 anemia. No TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation, no grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy or grade 3-4 ocular events were observed. Two pts experienced grade 2 keratitis, both rapidly recovered with local treatment. Hematological toxicity was moderate, with grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 15.7% and 9.8% pts, respectively. No complications related to neutropenia were reported. Grade 3 transaminase increase was observed in 1 patient. Conclusions The combination of SAR3419 plus R showed moderate ORR in R/R DLBCL; however the study population was of poor prognosis (60% refractory to first line therapy). In the relapsed DLBCL patients a higher ORR was observed. SAR3419 plus R presented with a favorable safety profile. Further investigations on biomarker expression are ongoing to identify a sub-group of pts who could have better benefited from this combination. Disclosures: Coiffier: Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Phase II of SAR3419. Ribrag:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Cartron:LFB: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Casasnovas:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hatteville:Sanofi: Employment. Zilocchi:Sanofi: Employment. Oprea:Sanofi: Employment. Tilly:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Abstract Introduction Among patients with aggressive B-NHL who fail RCHOP, about half respond to standard salvage regimens and may proceed to curative-intent, transplant-based therapy. However, whether pts failing more intensive regimens such as dose-adjusted, infusional EPOCH benefit from standard salvage regimens is unclear. We hypothesized that such patients comprise a higher-risk cohort, facing inferior response rates and outcomes using standard salvage regimens. We undertook a collaborative study to assess response rates and survival among pts failing EPOCH for aggressive B-NHL, to inform patient management and design of clinical trials in this setting. Methods Pharmacy records and institutional databases were queried, identifying pts receiving EPOCH over the last 10 years at the University of Washington/SCCA and the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, for combined analysis. Under IRB approval, patient characteristics, histology, outcome with EPOCH, time to EPOCH failure, response to salvage, and overall survival were analyzed. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, B-cell-lymphoma unclassifiable, HIV-associated B cell lymphoma, and transformed B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were included. Pts receiving <2 cycles EPOCH, or who had inadequate follow-up (<3 months), were excluded. Failure of EPOCH was defined as failure to respond or progression during therapy, need for initiation of salvage therapy, or death during therapy of any cause. Adverse events or treatment change due to toxicity were not included in the definition of failure. JMP 11 was used to generate kaplan-meier survival estimates. Results 124 pts with aggressive B-NHL receiving EPOCH were identified. 54 had not relapsed, and among 70 remaining da-EPOCH failures, 37 met the above inclusion criteria. Median age was 55. 27% were female, and 23 received EPOCH as first-line therapy. All but 3 received rituximab with EPOCH. Histologies were primarily DLBCL in 22/37 (60%) and BCL-U in 12/37 (32%) carrying a MYC translocation; most of these harbored additional translocations in BCL2 and/or BCL6 (10/12). However, data regarding MYC rearrangement was not available for all pts. 2 had HIV-associated B-NHL and 3 had PMBCL. With 18 months follow up, the median time to EPOCH failure was 5 months. Only 3 EPOCH failures occurred late (>12 months). Median OS from the date of EPOCH failure was 10 months (Figure 1). Those receiving EPOCH as first-line therapy (23) had a median OS of 14 months from EPOCH failure, as opposed to 4 months for those receiving EPOCH as salvage therapy (log-rank p=.01). Salvage chemotherapy regimens after EPOCH were diverse, and generally ineffective; 6/28 (21%) regimens produced a response (Table 1). Among patients failing EPOCH within a year, platinum-containing salvage (RICE/RDHAP) was effective in only 2/13 patients (15%). 9 patients did not receive any salvage, most of whom died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice care. Conclusions A relatively low overall response rate (21%) was observed in this retrospective analysis of patients failing EPOCH. Analogous to early RCHOP failure in the CORAL study, those failing EPOCH within a year may face inferior outcomes with platinum-based salvage therapy. While combined from two institutions, our data represent a modest sample size and require confirmation. If verified, examination of mechanisms of resistance to EPOCH, and selecting EPOCH failures for clinical trials of novel targeted therapies and transplant-based approaches, may prove critical. Table 1. Salvage Therapy for REPOCH failures Regimen: response/total number treated Notes Response to any salvage: 6/28 (21%) Some patients received more than 1 chemo salvage; responses were tabulated per regimen. RICE: 4/12 2/3 alive post transplant(1 auto 1 allo; 1 declined transplant and survived; 1 died) RDHAP: 1/6 Gemcitabine-based: 0/5 HyperCVAD (Part A and/or B): 1/5 Survivor had CNS only relapse, received regimen B and transplant 9- received no systemic treatmen; most died or proceeded to palliative measures and/or hospice Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent/Abbott: Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BioMarin: Research Funding; Piramal: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Hill:Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Till:Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.
Abstract Introduction: EBV can be associated with several types of lymphomas, with reported frequencies of up to 8-10% in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 30-100% in peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) subtypes, 80% in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and 15-30% in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), with adverse impact on outcomes. Nanatinostat (Nstat) is a Class-I selective oral HDAC inhibitor that induces the expression of the lytic BGLF4 EBV protein kinase in EBV + tumor cells, activating ganciclovir (GCV) via phosphorylation. This results in GCV-induced inhibition of viral and cellular DNA synthesis and apoptosis. Herein we report the final results from this exploratory study for patients with R/R EBV + lymphomas (NCT03397706). Methods: Patients aged ≥18 with histologically confirmed EBV + lymphomas (defined as any degree of EBER-ISH positivity), R/R to ≥1 prior systemic therapies with an absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0×10 9/L, platelet count ≥50×10 9/L, and no curative treatment options per investigator were enrolled into 5 dose escalation cohorts to determine the recommended phase 2 doses (RP2D) of Nstat + VGCV for phase 2 expansion. Phase 2 patients received the RP2D (Nstat 20 mg daily, 4 days per week + VGCV 900 mg orally daily) in 28-day cycles until disease progression or withdrawal. Primary endpoints were safety/RP2D (phase 1b) and overall response rate (ORR) (phase 2); secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics, duration of response (DoR), time to response, progression free survival and overall survival. Responses were assessed using Lugano 2014 response criteria beginning at week 8. Results: As of 18 June 2021, 55 patients were enrolled (phase 1b: 25; phase 2: 30). Lymphoma subtypes were DLBCL (n=7), extranodal NK/T-cell (ENKTL) (n=9), PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (n=5), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (n=6), cutaneous T cell (n=1), HL (n=11), other B cell (n=3), and immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (IA-LPD) (n=13), including PTLD (n=4), HIV-associated (n=5), and other [n=4: systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n=2), common variable/primary immunodeficiency (n=2)]. Median age was 60 years (range 19-84), M/F 35/20, median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-11), 76% had ≥2 prior therapies, 78% were refractory to their most recent prior therapy, and 84% had exhausted standard therapies. EBER positivity ranged from <1 to 90% in 42 tumor biopsies with central lab review. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of all grades were nausea (38%), neutropenia (34%), thrombocytopenia (34%), and constipation (31%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs in >10% of patients included neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (20%), anemia (20%), and lymphopenia (14%). Dose reductions and interruptions due to treatment-related AEs were reported in 14 (25%) and 16 (29%) patients, respectively. Only 1 patient had to discontinue therapy. There were no cases of CMV reactivation. For 43 evaluable patients (EBER-ISH + with ≥ 1 post-treatment response assessment) across all histologies, the investigator-assessed ORR and complete response (CR) rates were 40% (17/43) and 19% (8/43) respectively. Patients with T/NK-NHL (n=15; all refractory to their last therapy) had an ORR of 60% (n=9) with 27% (n=4) CRs. Two patients (ENKTL and PTCL-NOS) in PR and CR respectively were withdrawn at 6.7 and 6.6 months (m) respectively for autologous stem cell transplantation. For DLBCL (n=6), ORR/CR was 67%/33% (both CRs were in patients refractory to first-line R-CHOP). For IA-LPD (n=13), ORR/CR was 30%/20% (PTLD: 1 CR, other: 1 CR, 1 PR). For HL (n=10), there was 1 PR (4 SD). The median DoR for all responders was 10.4 m, with a median follow-up from response of 5.7 m (range 1.9-34.1 m). For the 17 responders, 8 lasted ≥ 6 months. Conclusions: The combination of Nstat and VGCV was well-tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile and shows promising efficacy in patients with R/R EBV + lymphomas, particularly in refractory T/NK-NHL, a heterogeneous group of aggressive lymphomas with dismal outcomes, with multiple durable responses. Further evaluation of this novel combination therapy for the treatment of recurrent EBV + lymphomas is ongoing in the phase 2 VT3996-202 trial. Disclosures Haverkos: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Baiocchi: Prelude Therapeutics: Consultancy; viracta: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Codiak Biosciences: Research Funding; Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy. Brammer: Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. Feldman: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Other: Study investigator. Brem: Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SeaGen: Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KiTE Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys/Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Scheinberg: Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Alexion pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Joffe: AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy. Katkov: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. McRae: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Royston: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Rojkjaer: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Porcu: Viracta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kiowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; DrenBio: Consultancy.
Abstract Background Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an autologous CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy product that was FDA approved for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after at least two lines of systemic therapy. In the pivotal ZUMA-1 study, the best overall response (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates observed in 108 patients treated with axi-cel were 82% and 58%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 15.4 months, 42% of the patients remain in ongoing response (Neelapu et al. N Eng J Med 2017). Analysis of efficacy outcomes in patients <65 years (N=81) and ³65 years (N=27) showed that the ORR and ongoing response at 12 months were comparable between the two subgroups (Neelapu et al. N Eng J Med 2017). Whether the safety is also comparable between the two subgroups is unknown. Here, we report safety outcomes in elderly patients (³65 years) with large B-cell lymphoma treated with axi-cel at our institution. Methods We retrospectively analyzed and reviewed the data from patients treated with axi-cel at our institution. Patients had a diagnosis of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL), and transformed follicular lymphoma (TFL). Patients were treated with conditioning chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine for 3 days followed by axi-cel infusion after 2 days of rest at a dose of 2 x 106 CAR+ T cells/kg body weight. Patients were monitored for toxicities for at least 7 days in the hospital after CAR T infusion and those who had at least 30 days of follow-up after axi-cel were considered to be evaluable for safety. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological toxicity termed as CAR-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES) were graded according to the CARTOX grading system (Neelapu et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018). Results A total of 61 patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma who received axi-cel at our institution were included. Of these, 44 (72%) patients were <65 years of age and 17 (28%) patients were ³65 years of age. The baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. ORR and CR rates at Day 30 were comparable between the two groups. CRS was common in both groups and was observed in 83% and 91% of the patients in the older and younger age groups, respectively. But most CRS events were grade 1-2. Grade 3 or higher CRS was observed in 18% vs. 11% in the older vs. younger age groups (P=0.67). One patient with a history of autoimmune disease in the elderly group died of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). CRES was observed in 58% and 71% of the patients in the older and younger age groups, respectively. Grade 3 or higher CRES was observed in 29% vs. 39% in the older vs. younger age groups (P=0.58). Median hospitalization period for axi-cel CAR T-cell therapy was comparable between the two groups. Conclusions Our results suggest that response rates are comparable between the elderly and younger age groups at day 30 after axi-cel therapy. Importantly, toxicities due to CRS and/or CRES after axi-cel CD19 CAR T cell therapy are comparable between the elderly (³65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Nastoupil: Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Juno: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therappeutics: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Fowler:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Samaniego:ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wang:Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MoreHealth: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Westin:Kite Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apotex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Introduction: Grey zone lymphoma (GZL), a B-cell lymphoma with features intermediate between large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) and classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), is a rare and poorly defined entity. To decipher its mutational landscape and discover new therapeutic targets, we performed exome sequencing of 31 GZL cases. Methods: GZL cases from the LYSA group (N=139) and BC Cancer (N=30) were centrally reviewed and classified as previously published (Sarkozy et al, Am J Surg Pathol 2019). Whole-exome sequencing was performed on 31 cases with available fresh frozen tissue, using laser micro-dissection (LMD, MMI technology) to enrich for tumor cells and obtain matching normal DNA from microenvironment cells. DNA was extracted (Agencourt® DNAdvance kit) and genomic libraries were constructed with the Ovation ultra-low kit (Nugen®). Exome capture was performed using Agilent SureSelectXT V6+UTR followed by paired-end sequencing (NextSeq®). Somatic nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels were identified using VarScan, Strelka and Mutect. Parameters affecting the sensitivity and specificity of variant calling were optimized using 7 "gold standard" cases for which DNA from peripheral blood cells was additionally available. Possible oncogenic drivers were identified based on rate of recurrence, MutSigCV and literature review. Results: Among the 31 GZL cases, the median age was 41 y (14-83) with a sex ratio of 15M:16F; 21 cases had mediastinal involvement, including 15 within the thymic area; EBER in-situ hybridization (ISH) was positive in 8 cases. Seven (23%) cases were classified as group-0 (cHL morphology with 100% CD20 expression), 22 (71%) with an intermediate morphology as group-1 (N=9, cHL-like morphology) or group-2 (N=13, LBCL-like morphology) and 2 (6%) as group-3 (LBCL with 100% of CD30 expression). The mean coverage was 96X (42-203) for tumor samples. One case was excluded due to failure in the LMD process. Among the 30 cases, 6628 variants across 4826 genes were found, including 2903 coding mutations (325 indels and 2808 SNVs, mean of 104/sample, range: 15-678), 721 affecting the 5' UTR and 2774 the 3' UTR. A total of 152 genes were identified as being potential oncogenic drivers, with a mean of 11 mutated genes per case (range 2-36). The most recurrently mutated genes were SOCS1 (33%), B2M (23%), GNA13 (20%), LRRN3 (17%), and ZNF217, NCOR1, ITPKB, IRF2BP2, CSF2RB, and CSMD3 (13% each). The epigenetic SWI/SNF and transcription regulation pathway (including NCOR1/2, ARID1A, KMT2D, KMT2A) was affected in 73% of the cases, JAK/STAT in 70% and NF-kB in 19%. As assessed by CNVkit and GISTIC, the most recurrent gains/amplifications identified were in 9p24.1 (JAK2, CD274, PDCD2LG2; 69%) and 2p16.1 (REL, BCL11A; 62%), and losses in 11q14.3 (ATM; 48%) and 12q24.33 (NCOR2; 48%). Based on mutational signature analysis, individual base substitutions were linked to mutagenic processes, with the highest contributions associated with aging (29%) and defective DNA mismatch repair (27%); moreover, mutations attributable to AID/APOBEC activity (5%), were found to be significantly enriched in EBV- vs. EBV+ cases (p = 0.013). EBV+ cases had fewer total variants (mean 98 vs 258, p=0.08) and potential oncogenic variants (mean 7 vs 15, p=0.03) compared to EBV- cases. EBV+ cases also lacked mutations in the NF-kB pathway and MHC-class I components (B2M and HLA-B: 0% vs 43% in EBV-, p=0.06) but had mutations in STAT3, DHX58, ACTB and ATP13A4 (6/7 cases) not present in the 23 EBV- cases. LRRN3 and GNA13 mutations were significantly associated with thymic area involvement (40% vs 0%, p=0.01). Furthermore, fluorescence-ISH indicated that 20% (1/5) of EBV+ cases had a rearrangement in the CIITA locus (16p13.13) vs 53% (9/17) in EBV- cases. Patients with an intermediate morphology had more oncogenic variants than those in group 0 and 3 (mean of 15 vs 6 variants/case, p=0.01 affecting 12 vs 5 genes, p=0.004). Finally, NCOR1 (N=4) and NCOR2 (N=2) mutations were exclusively found in cases with intermediate morphology (23% vs 0% for those with group 0 or 3 morphology). Conclusion: These data suggest that GZL is a highly heterogenous disease harboring somatic driver events shared with PMBCL and HL. We also discovered novel gene mutations pointing to the importance of previously unrecognized pathways in the pathogenesis of GZL. The distinct mutational pattern in EBV+ GZL suggests divergent evolutionary trajectories. Disclosures Sarkozy: Takeda: Research Funding. Salles:Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Servier, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Kite, MorphoSys: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Autolus: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Educational events; Roche, Janssen, Gilead, Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Educational events. Savage:BMS, Merck, Novartis, Verastem, Abbvie, Servier, and Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Scott:Celgene: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; NanoString: Patents & Royalties: Named inventor on a patent licensed to NanoSting [Institution], Research Funding. Steidl:Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Tioma: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Nanostring: Patents & Royalties: Filed patent on behalf of BC Cancer; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy.
Background B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is a transmembrane protein belonging to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily involved in the regulation of B cell proliferation and survival as well as maturation/differentiation into plasma cells. In multiple myeloma cells, overexpression of BCMA has been shown to activate mitogen activated protein kinase pathways (AKT, ERK1/2, and NF-κB) and upregulates anti-apoptotic proteins (MCL1, BCL2, BCL-xL) resulting in cellular proliferation. Immunotherapeutic strategies targeting BCMA are showing great promise in heavily pre-treated refractory multiple myeloma. Light Chain Amyloidosis (AL) is a multisystem disorder of clonal plasma cells that results in the production of an abnormal light chain which misfolds and deposits in the organs leading to disruption of tissue architecture, cellular stress, dysfunction and eventually, death. The smaller burden and lower proliferative potential of the offending clonal plasma cells in amyloidosis may potentially lend itself favorably to immunotherapeutic strategies targeting BCMA. Given the efficacy of this approach in MM, the evaluation of BCMA expression on the surface of amyloidogenic plasma cells is warranted. Methods All patients diagnosed with Light chain Amyloidosis at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, who had unstained bone marrow samples were identified. These unstained BM biopsy samples were prospectively stained for BCMA expression using Immunohistochemistry (IHC). We utilized a clinical-grade assay (clone D6; catalog sc-390147; company Santa-Cruz; monoclonal antibody; dilution 1:400) in a CLIA compliant setting. We scored the biopsies for BCMA expression, intensity, and site of staining. We also obtained their demographic details, staging, and cytogenetic information for the patients with available samples. Results During the queried period, 28 unstained samples were available for testing from the time of disease diagnosis. The median age of the population was 63 years (range 41-73). 64% of patients were male and consistent with the literature; a majority of patients (75%) had lambda-typic clonal plasma cells. Cytogenetic abnormalities using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were reviewed, t(11;14) was seen in 36% patients, and chromosome 1q and del 13q were each seen in 32% of patients. No patient had t(4;14) or del 17p. The median clonal PC burden in BM at diagnosis was 10% (range2-80%) and 36% had > 10% plasma cells. In clonal PCs, the median BCMA expression was 80% (range 20-100%). Only one patient had a staining intensity under 50% (20%). Membranous staining was noted in 82% of patients and a Golgi pattern in 11%. The median staining intensity was 2 (range 1-3). Of the patients with baseline diagnostic samples available for testing, six patients had additional unstained bone marrow samples for staining at the time of relapse. The majority of patients (83%) who relapsed had >10% plasma cells with a higher median plasma cell burden of 35% (range 10-80). The median BCMA expression was 65% (range 50-80) with no patient having <50% expression. The staining pattern was membranous in 50%, Golgi in 17%, and Golgi-membranous in 33%. At the time of relapse, the median clonal PC burden was 13% (range 5-30). BCMA expression continued to be present at the time of relapse with a median 75% (range 50-100) with predominantly membranous staining (83%). The median staining intensity in both diagnostic and relapsed tissue within the six samples studied was 1. Conclusions Our study represents the first description of BCMA expression on the surface of amyloidogenic plasma cells to our knowledge. BCMA is uniformly expressed by pathologic PCs in AL amyloidosis both at the time of diagnosis and relapse. Given the efficacy of BCMA directed therapy in multiple myeloma, further investigation of these agents in light-chain amyloidosis are warranted and may provide an effective therapeutic strategy in this devastating disease. Figure Disclosures Dogan: Corvus Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Giralt:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Hassoun:Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Landau:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Although chemo-immunotherapy has improved survival in B-cell lymphoma patients, refractory and relapsed disease still represents a major challenge, urging for development of new therapeutics. A new approach is to target nucleotide metabolism. Karonudib (TH1579), was developed to inhibit MutT-homologue-1/Nudix hydrolase 1 (MTH1/NUDT1), an enzyme that prevents oxidized nucleotides to be incorporated into DNA. Under normal conditions with low reactive oxygen species (ROS) burden, MTH1 is not essential for cell survival. This contrasts cancer cells which frequently upregulate MTH1 to compensate for increased ROS with corresponding higher oxidized nucleotide levels, and therefore become more susceptible for MTH1 inhibition. Here, our aim was to perform preclinical testing of karonudib in B-cell lymphoma. Using two different gene expression datasets, we demonstrate that NUDT1, the gene encoding MTH1, was highly upregulated in tumor biopsies from patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Burkitt's lymphoma as compared to follicular lymphoma and peripheral blood B cells from healthy donors, hence demonstrating a rationale for targeting MTH1 in aggressive B-cell lymphoma. We tested the efficacy of karonudib (0.06-1 µM) in vitro in a range of B-cell lymphoma cell lines using CellTiterGlo and by flow cytometry detection of active caspase-3 and TUNEL to identify apoptotic cells. Karonudib strongly reduced viability in all B-cell lymphoma cell lines tested (n = 12) and induced apoptosis at concentrations well tolerated by peripheral blood B cells from healthy donors. Cell cycle analysis and microscopy revealed that most cells arrested in prometaphase in the presence of karonudib. Failed spindle assembly led to mitotic arrest and subsequent apoptosis. Prometaphase arrest was seen in TP53 mutant as well as in TP53 wild type cell lines, confirming that karonudib induced apoptosis independent of TP53 mutational status. To test the efficacy of karonudib in vivo, we utilized two different lymphoma xenograft models, including an ABC DLBCL patient-derived model. Mice were treated with karonudib (90 mg/kg) or vehicle b.i.d, three times a week and tumor growth was monitored by in vivo imaging system or MR. In both models, karonudib as single agent completely controlled tumor growth, and significantly prolonged survival (p<0.0001, as compared to control mice). The specificity of MTH1 inhibitors has been debated and TH588, the first generation MTH1 inhibitor, was recently shown to bind b-tubulin and induce mitotic arrest in MTH1 knock out cell lines (Patterson et al, Cell Syst 2019). To elucidate the mechanism of karonudib in B-cell lymphoma, we generated MTH1 knock out cells using CRISPR/Cas9, and compared the functional effects of karonudib in these clones with the original lymphoma cells. We demonstrated on-target effect of the inhibitor as the MTH1 knock out clones were less sensitive towards karonudib. However, MTH1 knock out clones exhibited a similar cell cycle arrest as the wild type cells after karonudib treatment. This clearly indicates that karonudib can induce cell cycle arrest independent of MTH1, and hence has a dual mechanism of action. Our preclinical data suggest that karonudib is a promising drug with potential therapeutic use in B-cell lymphoma, and may be particular effective in aggressive lymphoma types. Disclosures Warpman Berglund: Oxcia AB: Other: shareholders; non profit Thomas Helleday Foundation for Medical Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Gad:Oxcia: Other: shareholder; non profit Thomas Helleday Foundation for Medical Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Pham:Oxcia AB: Other: Shareholder. Sanjiv:Oxcia AB: Other: Shareholder; non profit Thomas Helleday Foundation for Medical Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Helleday:Oxcia AB: Other: Shareholder; non profit Thomas Helleday Foundation for Medical Research: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.
