Source and Purity of Factor VIII Products As Risk Factors for Inhibitor Development In Previously Untreated Patients with Severe Hemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Maria Elisa Mancuso ◽  
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci ◽  
Angiola Rocino ◽  
Isabella Garagiola ◽  
Annarita Tagliaferri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
High Purity ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Specific Activity ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Treatment Data

Abstract Abstract 25 Background: Inhibitor development is influenced by several genetic and environmental factors and the type of factor VIII (FVIII) products may play a role. Methods: We designed a cohort study whose novelty resides in the classification of products not only according to the plasmatic (pdFVIII) or recombinant (rFVIII) source of FVIII but also to the degree of purity expressed as FVIII specific activity per mg of protein. The role of FVIII product as risk factor for inhibitor development was evaluated in a multivariate model adjusting for potential confounders (i.e. age at first FVIII exposure, intensive treatment and prophylaxis). Cumulative incidences of all and high-responding inhibitors were calculated for the whole cohort of 721 patients with severe and moderate hemophilia A followed-up in 3 Italian Hemophilia Centers. Detailed treatment data from the first FVIII infusion up to inhibitor development or 150 exposure days were available for 377 patients and in this group of patients risk factors for inhibitor development including the type of FVIII product and its degree of purity (i.e. low/intermediate-, high-purity pdFVIII and rFVIII) were analysed. Results: The overall cumulative incidence of inhibitors was 22% (n=160; 130 high-responders, 18%) and it was lower in patients first treated with pdFVIII (107/586, 18%) than in those treated with rFVIII (53/135, 39%). Similar results were obtained by evaluating only high-responding inhibitors and patients with severe hemophilia. The adjusted hazard ratio of inhibitor development was 4.9 with rFVIII and 2.0 with high-purity pdFVIII (95%CI: 2.9–8.3 and 1.1–4.0), taking as reference low/intermediate-purity pdFVIII. There was no difference in the frequency of inhibitor testing between treatment groups. Sensitivity analyses - in patients who never switched product type, previously untreated patients, those treated on-demand and those with high-risk F8 mutations - confirmed an increased inhibitor risk in patients first treated with rFVIII or high-purity pdFVIII than in those treated with low/intermediate-purity pdFVIII. In fact, in all the aforementioned subgroups by multivariate analysis the risk of inhibitor development was invariably 3- to 6-fold higher in patients first treated with rFVIII than in those first treated with pdFVIII, and similar results were obtained for both all inhibitors and high-responding inhibitors. Conclusions: This study shows that the degree of purity of FVIII products influences inhibitor development independently from other risk factors, and emphasizes that differences exist also within pdFVIII products. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Increased Prevalence of Inhibitors in Mexican-Hispanic Patients with Severe Hemophilia A Enrolled in the Universal Data Collection Project.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3488-3488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Carpenter ◽  
J. Michael Soucie ◽  
Sophia Sterner ◽  
Rodney J Presley
Keyword(s):  
African Americans ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Treatment Center ◽  
Hispanic Population ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Insurance Type

Abstract Abstract 3488 Poster Board III-425 Neutralizing inhibitor formation occurs in up to 20-30% of patients with severe factor VIII deficiency, leading to significantly increased morbidity in affected individuals. It has been well-established that patients of African descent have a higher prevalence of inhibitor development. [Oldenburg, J et al. Semin Hematol, 2004] The Hispanic population also has been assumed to have an increase in inhibitor development when compared with Caucasians. The study presented here is the first to definitively demonstrate an increased prevalence of inhibitors in the Hispanic population. We compared inhibitor prevalence among various racial and ethnic groups in a cross-sectional analysis of 6198 males with severe hemophilia A that participated in the Universal Data Collection project sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We used logistic regression analysis to control for potential confounding variables including age, insurance type (as a proxy for access to care and socio-economic status), age at first bleed, age at diagnosis and use of prophylaxis. The included table shows those variables that were determined to be independently predictive of inhibitors. We assigned Mexican derivation to participants who labeled themselves as Hispanic and who were born either in Mexico, in states bordering Mexico or in states with large Mexican populations as established by Census data. The prevalence of high titer inhibitors in the Mexican-Hispanic population was 26.3% compared to 16.4% for Caucasian patients [OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1, 1.9], and 26.8% for African-Americans. The underlying cause of increased inhibitor prevalence in these populations is still unknown, though a recent study in African-Americans demonstrated wild-type factors unique from commercially available product. [Viel KR, et al. Inhibitor of Factor VIII in Black Patients with Hemophilia. N Engl J Med, 2009] Further investigation of this phenomenon in the Mexican-Hispanic population, as well as the potential impact of differing immune responses, is warranted. Multivariate analysis of ethnicity and other variables found to be independently predictive of a prevalent inhibitor Characteristic Odds Ratio 95% CI Race/Ethnicity African-American 1.5 1.2 - 1.9 Mexican Hispanic 1.5 1.1 - 1.9 Hispanic 1.2 0.9 - 1.7 Other 1.2 0.9 - 1.6 White Ref Age* (years) <2 4.2 3.0 - 5.9 2-5 6.4 5.1 - 8.0 6-10 2.8 2.2 - 3.5 11-18 1.7 1.4 – 2.1 >18 Ref Insurance type Medicare 1.8 1.4 - 2.3 Medicaid 1.3 1.1 - 1.5 State program 1.1 0.6 - 1.9 TRICARE 1.0 0.4 - 2.1 Other 0.8 0.6 - 1.2 Uninsured 1.6 1.0 - 2.4 Commercial Ref Prophylaxis Yes 0.6 0.5 - 0.7 No Ref * Age with inhibitor or last UDC visit if no inhibitor The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of the Hemophilia Treatment Center Network Investigators in the completion of this study. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Factor VIII brand and the incidence of factor VIII inhibitors in previously untreated UK children with severe hemophilia A, 2000-2011

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (23) ◽  
pp. 3389-3397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. Collins ◽  
Benedict P. Palmer ◽  
Elizabeth A. Chalmers ◽  
Daniel P. Hart ◽  
Ri Liesner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Intensive Treatment ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Key Points

Key Points Kogenate Bayer/Helixate NexGen was associated with a higher inhibitor incidence than Advate in 407 consecutive UK severe hemophilia A previously untreated patients. Other risk factors for inhibitor development were factor VIII genotype, ethnicity, and intensive treatment episodes.

Incidence of Factor VIII Inhibitor Development in Severe Hemophilia A Patients Treated only with One Brand of Highly Purified Plasma-Derived Concentrate

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (02) ◽  
pp. 215-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude Guérois ◽  
Yves Laurian ◽  
Chantal Rothschild ◽  
Armelle Parquet-Gernez ◽  
Anne-Marie Duclos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
High Purity ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Cumulative Exposure ◽  
Factor Viii Inhibitor ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Viral Inactivation ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Viii Inhibitor ◽  
Low Incidence

SummaryThe incidence of factor VIII inhibitor was studied in a cohort of 56 previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII below 1 U/dl). They received only one brand of highly purified factor VIII concentrate (HPSD-VIII) prepared by conventional chromatography with a solvent-detergent step for viral inactivation. Followup since the first infusion of HPSD-VIII was from 1 to 76 months (mean = 29) and cumulative exposure days (CED) from 1 to over 100 (median = 26). Five patients (9%) developed an inhibitor after 6 to 19 CED, only one being a high responder (2%), showing a low incidence of inhibitor compared with previous studies using high purity plasma- derived or recombinant products.

scholarly journals Recombinant factor VIII products and inhibitor development in previously untreated boys with severe hemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (23) ◽  
pp. 3398-3408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Calvez ◽  
Hervé Chambost ◽  
Ségolène Claeyssens-Donadel ◽  
Roseline d’Oiron ◽  
Véronique Goulet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Recombinant Factor Viii ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Key Points

Key Points A currently marketed rFVIII product is associated with a higher risk of inhibitor development in boys with severe hemophilia A. This result, validated by extensive sensitivity analyses, confirms a recently published study and cannot be explained by identified biases.

Inhibitor Development In Patients with Mild and Moderate Hemophilia A: Results From a Single Centre.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1407-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohann Repesse ◽  
Philippe Gautier ◽  
Annie Borel-Derlon
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Direct Sequencing ◽  
Immunosuppressive Treatment ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Treatment Centre

Abstract Abstract 1407 The development of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors is usually considered uncommon among patients with mild and moderate hemophilia A (HA) and less frequent than in patients with severe HA. We report here the prevalence of FVIII inhibitors and their caracteristics in 167 patients with mild and moderate HA followed in Caen Hemophilia Treatment Centre (Table). FVIII molecular defects were identified by direct sequencing in 167 patients including 30 and 137 with mild and moderate HA, respectively. Following FVIII concentrates infusions, FVIII inhibitors occured in 7.8% of patients (13/167). Fifteen percent (2/13) were low-responding inhibitors. The risk of inhibitor development appeared to be associated with high-risk FVIII genotypes clustered in the A2 and C2 domains, especially p.Arg2150His (50%) and p.Arg593Cys mutations. Interestingly, we described inhibitor development associated with novel missense-mutations (p.Tyr1786Ser, p.Asp115Tyr and -219C>T substitutions in FVIII gene promoter). In addition, high regimen infusion of FVIII concentrates appeared as risk factor for FVIII inhibitors development. Indeed, 60% (8/13) developped FVIII inhibitors following massive infusion of FVIII concentrates associated with FVIII:C levels above 1.2 UI/dL. Inhibitors in mild HA usually cross-react with endogenous factor VIII reducing the circulating basal FVIII:C level and are associated with more bleeding events. Similarly, we observed the evolution of bleeding patterns in our cohort to severe phenotypes. Bleedings were treated with FVIII concentrates and bypassing therapies (activated FVII and activated-prothrombin complex). About 25% (3/13) of these inhibitors disappeared spontaneously. Induction of Immune Tolerance (ITI) protocoles with high doses of FVIII were initiated for 7 high-responding patients with a success rate of 85 % (6/7). However, inhibitors persisted long-term and remained troublesome in 1 of these patients despite of ITI protocole. For two patients, immunosuppressive treatment with corticosteroids was started. Inhibitors disappeared and the levels of FVIII:C became detectable within 6 months. Development of FVIII inhibitors, their disappearance and the efficacy of ITI regimen seem to be different from our experience between patients with mild or moderate HA and severe HA. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Recombinant versus plasma-derived factor VIII products and the development of inhibitors in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A: the CANAL cohort study

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (11) ◽  
pp. 4693-4697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha C. Gouw ◽  
Johanna G. van der Bom ◽  
Günter Auerswald ◽  
Carmen Escuriola Ettinghausen ◽  
Ulf Tedgård ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Recombinant Factor Viii ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
Viii Product

Abstract It has been suggested that plasma-derived factor VIII products induce fewer inhibitors than recombinant factor VIII products. We investigated the relationship of factor VIII product type and switching between factor VIII products with the risk to develop inhibitors. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 316 patients with severe hemophilia A born between 1990 and 2000. The outcome was clinically relevant inhibitor development, defined as the occurrence of at least 2 positive inhibitor titers with decreased recovery. The risk of inhibitor development was not clearly lower in plasma-derived compared with recombinant factor VIII products (relative risk [RR], 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-1.3). Among high-titer inhibitors, the possible reduction in risk was even less pronounced (RR, 0.9; CI, 0.5-1.5). Plasma-derived products with considerable quantities of von Willebrand factor (VWF) carried the same risk for inhibitor development as recombinant factor VIII products (RR, 1.0; CI, 0.6-1.6). Switching between factor VIII products did not increase the risk for inhibitors (RR, 1.1; CI, 0.6-1.8). In conclusion, our findings support neither the notion that plasma-derived factor VIII products with considerable concentrations of VWF confer a lower risk to develop inhibitory antibodies than recombinant factor VIII products, nor that switching between factor VIII product brands increases inhibitor risks in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A.

scholarly journals Biological considerations of plasma-derived and recombinant factor VIII immunogenicity

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (24) ◽  
pp. 3147-3154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Lai ◽  
Christine Hough ◽  
Julie Tarrant ◽  
David Lillicrap
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Environmental Variables ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Genetic Factors ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Epidemiologic Studies ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Recombinant Fviii

Abstract In hemophilia A, the most severe complication of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy involves the formation of FVIII neutralizing antibodies, also known as inhibitors, in 25% to 30% of patients. This adverse event is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and economic burden, thus highlighting the need to identify methods to limit FVIII immunogenicity. Inhibitor development is regulated by a complex balance of genetic factors, such as FVIII genotype, and environmental variables, such as coexistent inflammation. One of the hypothesized risk factors of inhibitor development is the source of the FVIII concentrate, which could be either recombinant or plasma derived. Differential immunogenicity of these concentrates has been documented in several recent epidemiologic studies, thus generating significant debate within the hemophilia treatment community. To date, these discussions have been unable to reach a consensus regarding how these outcomes might be integrated into enhancing clinical care. Moreover, the biological mechanistic explanations for the observed differences are poorly understood. In this article, we complement the existing epidemiologic investigations with an overview of the range of possible biochemical and immunologic mechanisms that may contribute to the different immune outcomes observed with plasma-derived and recombinant FVIII products.

French Previously Untreated Patients with Severe Hemophilia A after Exposure to Recombinant Factor VIII : Incidence of Inhibitor and Evaluation of Immune Tolerance

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 779-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Laurian ◽  
E. P. Satre ◽  
A. Borel Derlon ◽  
H. Chambost ◽  
P. Moreau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Recombinant Factor Viii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Intron 22 Inversion ◽  
Median Period

SummaryFifty French previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII <1%), treated with only one brand of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII), were evaluated for inhibitor development, assessment of risk factors and outcome of immune tolerance regimen. The median period on study was 32 months (range 9-74) since the first injection of rFVIII. Fourteen patients (28%) developed an inhibitor, four of whom (8%) with a high titer (≥10 BU). All inhibitor patients but one continued to receive rFVIII either for on-demand treatment or for immune tolerance regimen (ITR). Among these patients, inhibitor was transient in 2 (4%), became undetectable in 6 and was still present in 6. The prevalence of inhibitor was 12%. Presence of intron 22 inversion was found to be a risk factor for inhibitor development. Immune tolerance was difficult to achieve in our series despite a follow-up period of 16 to 30 months: immune tolerance was complete in only one out of the 3 patients undergoing low dose ITR and in one out of the 5 patients with high dose ITR.

Incidence of Factor VIII Inhibitor Development in Hemophilia A Patients Treated with Less Pure Plasma Derived Concentrates

1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (05) ◽  
pp. 544-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
R de Biasi ◽  
A Rocino ◽  
M L Papa ◽  
E Salerno ◽  
L Mastrullo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
High Purity ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Cumulative Risk ◽  
Factor Viii Inhibitor ◽  
Anamnestic Response ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Factor Viii Concentrates ◽  
Very High

SummaryVery-high-purity Factor VIII concentrates produced by monoclonal or recombinant technology have been postulated to be more antigenic resulting in an increased risk of inhibitor development in hemophilia A patients. However, previous reports, mainly based on prevalence figures, may have understimated the “true” risk of this complication in patients treated with less pure Factor VIII concentrates. The present study, started in 1975, has been designed to calculate the risk of inhibitor development in patients with severe or moderate hemophilia A, followed since their first exposure to intermediate or high-purity Factor VIII concentrates, produced by conventional technologies. Sixty-four hemophiliacs fulfilled the enrollment criteria. Inhibitors developed in 20.3% (13/64) of all patients and in 23% (11/48) of those with severe Factor VIII deficiency. Eleven patients manifested a strong anamnestic response after exposure to Factor VIII (high responders) and 2 had low inhibitor concenlialions despite repeated Factor Vlll infusions (low responders). The incidence of inhibitor development was 24.6 per 1000 patient yeuis of observalion. The, cumulative! risk of inhibitor formation was 19,9% at age of 6 years, and 20.3% at 5 years after the first exposure. The risk was 19.3% at 70 days of exposure to Factor VIII concentrates, and 17.2% after a total of 50,000 units of Factor VIII given.Further stuides are needed to confirm the above risk of acquiring an inhibitor, which indicates and under-estimations by previous studies. In addition, more data is needed to demonstrate whether very high purity Factor VIII concentrates may be more antigenie than conventional preparations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document