scholarly journals Factor VIII brand and the incidence of factor VIII inhibitors in previously untreated UK children with severe hemophilia A, 2000-2011

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (23) ◽  
pp. 3389-3397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. Collins ◽  
Benedict P. Palmer ◽  
Elizabeth A. Chalmers ◽  
Daniel P. Hart ◽  
Ri Liesner ◽  
...  

Key Points Kogenate Bayer/Helixate NexGen was associated with a higher inhibitor incidence than Advate in 407 consecutive UK severe hemophilia A previously untreated patients. Other risk factors for inhibitor development were factor VIII genotype, ethnicity, and intensive treatment episodes.

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Maria Elisa Mancuso ◽  
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci ◽  
Angiola Rocino ◽  
Isabella Garagiola ◽  
Annarita Tagliaferri ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 25 Background: Inhibitor development is influenced by several genetic and environmental factors and the type of factor VIII (FVIII) products may play a role. Methods: We designed a cohort study whose novelty resides in the classification of products not only according to the plasmatic (pdFVIII) or recombinant (rFVIII) source of FVIII but also to the degree of purity expressed as FVIII specific activity per mg of protein. The role of FVIII product as risk factor for inhibitor development was evaluated in a multivariate model adjusting for potential confounders (i.e. age at first FVIII exposure, intensive treatment and prophylaxis). Cumulative incidences of all and high-responding inhibitors were calculated for the whole cohort of 721 patients with severe and moderate hemophilia A followed-up in 3 Italian Hemophilia Centers. Detailed treatment data from the first FVIII infusion up to inhibitor development or 150 exposure days were available for 377 patients and in this group of patients risk factors for inhibitor development including the type of FVIII product and its degree of purity (i.e. low/intermediate-, high-purity pdFVIII and rFVIII) were analysed. Results: The overall cumulative incidence of inhibitors was 22% (n=160; 130 high-responders, 18%) and it was lower in patients first treated with pdFVIII (107/586, 18%) than in those treated with rFVIII (53/135, 39%). Similar results were obtained by evaluating only high-responding inhibitors and patients with severe hemophilia. The adjusted hazard ratio of inhibitor development was 4.9 with rFVIII and 2.0 with high-purity pdFVIII (95%CI: 2.9–8.3 and 1.1–4.0), taking as reference low/intermediate-purity pdFVIII. There was no difference in the frequency of inhibitor testing between treatment groups. Sensitivity analyses - in patients who never switched product type, previously untreated patients, those treated on-demand and those with high-risk F8 mutations - confirmed an increased inhibitor risk in patients first treated with rFVIII or high-purity pdFVIII than in those treated with low/intermediate-purity pdFVIII. In fact, in all the aforementioned subgroups by multivariate analysis the risk of inhibitor development was invariably 3- to 6-fold higher in patients first treated with rFVIII than in those first treated with pdFVIII, and similar results were obtained for both all inhibitors and high-responding inhibitors. Conclusions: This study shows that the degree of purity of FVIII products influences inhibitor development independently from other risk factors, and emphasizes that differences exist also within pdFVIII products. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (10) ◽  
pp. 1245-1250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonino Cannavò ◽  
Carla Valsecchi ◽  
Isabella Garagiola ◽  
Roberta Palla ◽  
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci ◽  
...  

Key Points Nonneutralizing antibodies against FVIII are detected in untreated or minimally treated patients with hemophilia A. The presence of nonneutralizing antibodies is associated with a substantially increased risk of inhibitor development.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 121 (20) ◽  
pp. 4046-4055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha C. Gouw ◽  
H. Marijke van den Berg ◽  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Günter Auerswald ◽  
Manuel Carcao ◽  
...  

Key Points High-dose intensive factor VIII treatment increases the risk for inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A. In patients with severe hemophilia A, factor VIII prophylaxis decreases inhibitor risk, especially in patients with low-risk F8 mutations.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (23) ◽  
pp. 3398-3408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Calvez ◽  
Hervé Chambost ◽  
Ségolène Claeyssens-Donadel ◽  
Roseline d’Oiron ◽  
Véronique Goulet ◽  
...  

Key Points A currently marketed rFVIII product is associated with a higher risk of inhibitor development in boys with severe hemophilia A. This result, validated by extensive sensitivity analyses, confirms a recently published study and cannot be explained by identified biases.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1158-1158
Author(s):  
Petra C. ter Avest ◽  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Marijke H. van den Berg ◽  
Johanna G. van der Bom

Abstract Background. Replacement therapy in severe hemophilia A patients is complicated by formation of inhibitors in around 25% of children. Identification of patients at the highest risk may help to tailor personalized treatment strategies. Objectives. To develop a scoring system that may be used to identify patients at the highest risk of inhibitor development at first treatment. Methods. We used the data from a retrospective multicentre cohort study (the Canal cohort) of patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII (FVIII)less than 0.01 IU/ml), born 1990–2000, followed at least until their 50th exposure day. Presence of inhibitor was defined as twice a positive inhibitor titer and a decreased FVIII recovery. Based on the coefficients of a logistic regression model, a weighted risk-score was developed. Shrinkage of regression coefficients was used to control for overfitting. The discriminative ability of the risk-score was expressed as the area under the curve (AUC) of a receiver operating characteristic curve. Results. Out of the 366 patients from the Canal cohort, 284 children were selected of whom 78 developed an inhibitor (27%). Logistic regression analysis revealed 3 independent risk factors for inhibitor development: positive family history, intensive treatment (at least 5 consecutive days) at the first FVIII exposure, and high risk FVIII gene mutations. Table 1 presents odds ratios of the uni- and multivariate analyses, and the risk score. The AUC for the risk-score was 0,724. Table 2 shows that the model is able to separate high and low risk patients from patients with an intermediate risk of 25%. Conclusions. The risk score includes positive family history of inhibitors, high risk factor VIII gene mutation and intensive treatment at first FVIII exposure. This risk score can recognize patients with a doubled risk for inhibitor development and may be used to guide inhibitor preventive treatment strategies. Table 1. Uni- and Multivariate analysis and risk-score. OR (CI), Univariate OR (CI), Multivariate p-value Risk-Score CI = confidence interval 95% Positive Family History of Inhibitors 4.0 (1.7–9.4) 3.0 (1.2–7.7) ,022 3 High risk FVIII Gene Mutation 3.6 (1.8–7.2) 3.7 (1.8–7.9) ,001 4 Intensive Treatment at 1st FVIII exposure 6.8 (3.6–12.9) 7.2 (3.4–15.1) ,000 6 Table 2. Calibration of the risk-score. Model Total n° patients Predicted n° Inhibitors Observed n° Inhibitors Positive Predictive Value Negative Predictive Value LR= Low Risk, MR= Medium Risk, HR= High risk LR:0 72 7 6 0,34 0,92 MR:3–4 153 39 38 0,25 0,69 HR: >4 59 32 34 0,58 0,80


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3488-3488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Carpenter ◽  
J. Michael Soucie ◽  
Sophia Sterner ◽  
Rodney J Presley

Abstract Abstract 3488 Poster Board III-425 Neutralizing inhibitor formation occurs in up to 20-30% of patients with severe factor VIII deficiency, leading to significantly increased morbidity in affected individuals. It has been well-established that patients of African descent have a higher prevalence of inhibitor development. [Oldenburg, J et al. Semin Hematol, 2004] The Hispanic population also has been assumed to have an increase in inhibitor development when compared with Caucasians. The study presented here is the first to definitively demonstrate an increased prevalence of inhibitors in the Hispanic population. We compared inhibitor prevalence among various racial and ethnic groups in a cross-sectional analysis of 6198 males with severe hemophilia A that participated in the Universal Data Collection project sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We used logistic regression analysis to control for potential confounding variables including age, insurance type (as a proxy for access to care and socio-economic status), age at first bleed, age at diagnosis and use of prophylaxis. The included table shows those variables that were determined to be independently predictive of inhibitors. We assigned Mexican derivation to participants who labeled themselves as Hispanic and who were born either in Mexico, in states bordering Mexico or in states with large Mexican populations as established by Census data. The prevalence of high titer inhibitors in the Mexican-Hispanic population was 26.3% compared to 16.4% for Caucasian patients [OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1, 1.9], and 26.8% for African-Americans. The underlying cause of increased inhibitor prevalence in these populations is still unknown, though a recent study in African-Americans demonstrated wild-type factors unique from commercially available product. [Viel KR, et al. Inhibitor of Factor VIII in Black Patients with Hemophilia. N Engl J Med, 2009] Further investigation of this phenomenon in the Mexican-Hispanic population, as well as the potential impact of differing immune responses, is warranted. Multivariate analysis of ethnicity and other variables found to be independently predictive of a prevalent inhibitor Characteristic Odds Ratio 95% CI Race/Ethnicity African-American 1.5 1.2 - 1.9 Mexican Hispanic 1.5 1.1 - 1.9 Hispanic 1.2 0.9 - 1.7 Other 1.2 0.9 - 1.6 White Ref Age* (years) <2 4.2 3.0 - 5.9 2-5 6.4 5.1 - 8.0 6-10 2.8 2.2 - 3.5 11-18 1.7 1.4 – 2.1 >18 Ref Insurance type Medicare 1.8 1.4 - 2.3 Medicaid 1.3 1.1 - 1.5 State program 1.1 0.6 - 1.9 TRICARE 1.0 0.4 - 2.1 Other 0.8 0.6 - 1.2 Uninsured 1.6 1.0 - 2.4 Commercial Ref Prophylaxis Yes 0.6 0.5 - 0.7 No Ref * Age with inhibitor or last UDC visit if no inhibitor The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions of the Hemophilia Treatment Center Network Investigators in the completion of this study. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (23) ◽  
pp. 2559-2568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia E. Zerra ◽  
Courtney Cox ◽  
W. Hunter Baldwin ◽  
Seema R. Patel ◽  
Connie M. Arthur ◽  
...  

Key Points FVIII colocalizes with MZ B cells following infusion into hemophilia A mice. Depletion of MZ B cells prevents FVIII inhibitor development in hemophilia A mice.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (11) ◽  
pp. 4693-4697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha C. Gouw ◽  
Johanna G. van der Bom ◽  
Günter Auerswald ◽  
Carmen Escuriola Ettinghausen ◽  
Ulf Tedgård ◽  
...  

Abstract It has been suggested that plasma-derived factor VIII products induce fewer inhibitors than recombinant factor VIII products. We investigated the relationship of factor VIII product type and switching between factor VIII products with the risk to develop inhibitors. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 316 patients with severe hemophilia A born between 1990 and 2000. The outcome was clinically relevant inhibitor development, defined as the occurrence of at least 2 positive inhibitor titers with decreased recovery. The risk of inhibitor development was not clearly lower in plasma-derived compared with recombinant factor VIII products (relative risk [RR], 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-1.3). Among high-titer inhibitors, the possible reduction in risk was even less pronounced (RR, 0.9; CI, 0.5-1.5). Plasma-derived products with considerable quantities of von Willebrand factor (VWF) carried the same risk for inhibitor development as recombinant factor VIII products (RR, 1.0; CI, 0.6-1.6). Switching between factor VIII products did not increase the risk for inhibitors (RR, 1.1; CI, 0.6-1.8). In conclusion, our findings support neither the notion that plasma-derived factor VIII products with considerable concentrations of VWF confer a lower risk to develop inhibitory antibodies than recombinant factor VIII products, nor that switching between factor VIII product brands increases inhibitor risks in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (24) ◽  
pp. 3147-3154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Lai ◽  
Christine Hough ◽  
Julie Tarrant ◽  
David Lillicrap

Abstract In hemophilia A, the most severe complication of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy involves the formation of FVIII neutralizing antibodies, also known as inhibitors, in 25% to 30% of patients. This adverse event is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and economic burden, thus highlighting the need to identify methods to limit FVIII immunogenicity. Inhibitor development is regulated by a complex balance of genetic factors, such as FVIII genotype, and environmental variables, such as coexistent inflammation. One of the hypothesized risk factors of inhibitor development is the source of the FVIII concentrate, which could be either recombinant or plasma derived. Differential immunogenicity of these concentrates has been documented in several recent epidemiologic studies, thus generating significant debate within the hemophilia treatment community. To date, these discussions have been unable to reach a consensus regarding how these outcomes might be integrated into enhancing clinical care. Moreover, the biological mechanistic explanations for the observed differences are poorly understood. In this article, we complement the existing epidemiologic investigations with an overview of the range of possible biochemical and immunologic mechanisms that may contribute to the different immune outcomes observed with plasma-derived and recombinant FVIII products.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document