Quality of Life During Early Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment As Self-Reported by Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Participating in a Prospective Observational Study (SIMPLICITY)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4435-4435
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Michael J. Mauro ◽  
Stuart L. Goldberg ◽  
Ron Paquette ◽  
H. Jean Khoury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Treatment Adherence ◽  
Treatment Satisfaction ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 4435 Background: Over the past decade, oral BCR-ABL inhibitors including imatinib, dasatinib and nilotinib have revolutionized chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment. Clinical trials have provided evidence of improved outcomes with all three agents in the treatment of CML. However, limited information is available regarding the impact of disease and treatment on quality of life (QoL) in CML patients. Methods: SIMPLICITY is an ongoing 5-year USA/European prospective, observational cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01244750). Eligibility criteria include: newly diagnosed CML-CP, age ≥18 years and therapy with 1st-line imatinib, dasatinib or nilotinib at participating medical centers. The study aims to capture information on the use of these agents in clinical practice, including their impact on patient QoL. Through self-administered patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaires, QoL and treatment-adherence data are being collected at 6-month intervals throughout study follow-up. Data from available initial PRO assessments of patients enrolled as of August 2011 are presented: Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), MD Anderson Symptom Inventory - CML (MDASI-CML), FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale - 8 item (MMAS-8). Results: A total of 74 patients currently enrolled was included in this analysis of which 79.7% (n=59) received imatinib, 10.8% (n=8) received nilotinib and 9.5% (n=7) received dasatinib as 1st-line CML treatment. Median age was 57 years (range 19–94 years); a slightly higher proportion of patients were female (59.5%; n=44); and median time to completion of the PRO questionnaires from initiation of treatment was 383.5 days (range 4-1,225 days). Prior to completion of the PROs, mean treatment exposure was approximately 18 months for imatinib, 5 months for nilotinib and 4 months for dasatinib. Summary scores for the CTSQ, MDASI-CML and FACT-G are presented in Table 1. Due to small sample size, differences in scores between treatments were not statistically tested. At time of enrollment in the study, treatment satisfaction in this cohort was high (SWT score ± standard deviation [SD] =91.2 ±10.3). QoL, as measured by the FACT-G total and sub-scale scores, also indicated positive physical, social, emotional and functional well-being. Mean MDASI scores for Symptom Interference and Symptom Distress suggested the impact of symptoms was mild to moderate. From the MMAS-8, 71.8% (n=51) of patients reported medium/high adherence to their CML medication (scoring between 6–8 on an 8-point scale). Conclusions: Preliminary QoL evaluation suggests that newly diagnosed CML-CP patients are generally satisfied with treatment and report overall good health, although approximately 30% reported low adherence to their CML treatment. Initial assessment of the enrolled cohort suggests variance in treatment adherence patterns, as well as differences in the impact of symptoms by treatment; however, as these differences were not statistically tested, no firm conclusions can be drawn at this time. As patient enrollment continues, comparative effectiveness of these CML treatments and differences in QoL outcomes will be further observed. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Mauro:BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Goldberg:Novartis Pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Paquette:BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria. Khoury:BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hirji:BMS: Employment. Wagner:BMS: Employment. Joo:BMS: Employment. Davis:BMS: Employment.

scholarly journals Venetoclax Improves Quality of Life for Patients with Elapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4858-4858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Cochrane ◽  
Tatiana Chagorova ◽  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Su-Peng Yeh ◽  
Evgeny Nikitin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
The Impact

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have significantly decreased health related quality of life (HRQoL), particularly related to severe and progressive fatigue. Side effects of chemotherapies and the emotional burden of living with an often poor prognosis disease also negatively impact patient HRQoL. Venetoclax, an oral agent that targets the anti-apoptotic protein BCL2, has demonstrated high rates of deep and durable response in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL, including those with 17p deletions, and has been shown to facilitate clinically relevant improvement in several key aspects of functioning and HRQoL. We evaluated the impact of venetoclax monotherapy on the quality of life of patients with R/R CLL. METHODS: VENICE II is an ongoing open-label, phase 3b, multicenter study (NCT02980731) that assessed patient-reported HRQoL in patients who were ≥18 years old with R/R CLL, including those with 17p deletion, TP53 mutations, and/or prior experience with B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor-containing (BCRi) therapy, treated with venetoclax monotherapy (5-week dose-titration, starting at 20mg once daily, then increased weekly to 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg, followed by 400mg once daily). The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline to Week 48 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) subscale. HRQoL subscales analyzed included: Global Health Status, Role Functioning, Emotional Functioning, Cognitive Functioning, Social Functioning, and Fatigue. The impact on QoL was also assessed on the CLL Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16). Relevance of mean changes in HRQoL measures from baseline were analyzed based on minimum important difference (MID); a 5-10 point change was defined as MID, and >10 points was considered clinically meaningful.(Osoba, D., et al. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:139-44. Osoba, D., et al. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:353-64.) Safety and adverse events (AEs) were also monitored. RESULTS: As of the data cutoff, April 30, 2018, the median time on study was 28 weeks (range: 1 - 73) and the median time on therapy was 23 weeks (range: 0.1 - 69) in this ongoing study. Of the 169 treated patients, 70% were male; the median age was 65 years (range: 24 - 86). Among those with available data, 17p deletions and TP53 mutations were confirmed in 34% (41/122) and 38% (19/50) of patients, respectively. Overall, 38%, 20%, and 42% of patients had one, two, and three (or more) prior lines of therapy respectively; 21% of patients had prior BCRi therapy. Clinically meaningful improvements from baseline were observed by week 12 and were sustained through week 48 in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health status and the role function, social function, and fatigue subscales (Table and Figure 1A) and EORTC-QLQ-CLL16 future health and disease effect subscales (Table and Figure 1B). Eighty-two percent of patients had at least 1 AE; most commonly observed AEs (≥10% of patients) were neutropenia (35%), diarrhea (17%), thrombocytopenia (15%), anemia (12%), nausea (12%), and upper respiratory infection (11%). Twenty-eight percent of patients had a serious AE, of which the most common were pneumonia (5%), febrile neutropenia (4%) and pyrexia (3%). Five percent of patients discontinued the study due to an AE. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data from this ongoing study suggest that patients with R/R CLL experienced improvement in several key aspects of functioning and quality of life with venetoclax monotherapy within the first 12 weeks which is sustained over time. Venetoclax monotherapy was well tolerated in R/R CLL patients. These findings are consistent with previous studies of R/R CLL patients who received venetoclax monotherapy. Disclosures Cochrane: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Calgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Robak:AbbVie, Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy. Yeh:GNT Biotech & Medicals Crop.: Research Funding. Nikitin:AbbVie, Inc: Speakers Bureau. Breuleux:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership; Gilead: Equity Ownership; Basilea: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Patents & Royalties. Masud:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sail:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Komlosi:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Walter and Eliza Hall: Employment, Patents & Royalties; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Continuous Mobile Wearable Bio-Monitoring of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Undergoing Initial Chemotherapy

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4751-4751
Author(s):  
Elizabet Tavitian ◽  
Donna Mastey ◽  
Meghan Salcedo ◽  
Andrew Zarski ◽  
Aisara Chansakul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Activity Measurements ◽  
Bio Monitoring

Abstract Introduction The current standard to assess chemotherapy tolerability relies on patient self-reporting. However, as the sole mechanism of managing symptom burden, this may be inconsistent and fraught with bias. Mobile wearable health devices have the ability to monitor and aggregate objective activity and sleep data over long periods of time, but have not been systematically used in the oncology clinic. The aim of the study was to assess whether the use of mobile wearable technology establishes patterns of "sleep" and "wake" states in newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) patients receiving therapy, and whether these patterns differ over time. Methods Patients presenting to the myeloma clinic at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) with a new diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma and smart phone or tablet (iOS or Android) compatible with the Garmin Vivofit device were offered to participate in a mobile wearable bio-monitoring study. All eligible participants were required to receive primary chemotherapy treatment at a MSKCC facility. Treatment was determined by physician. NDMM patients were assigned to one of two cohorts (20 in each; Cohort A - patients <65 years; Cohort B - patients ≥ 65 years). Patients were given Garmin Vivofit devices and asked to download a Garmin Vivofit application and Medidata electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) application on their phone or tablet. Patients were bio-monitored for physical activity and sleep during baseline period (1-7 days prior to chemotherapy initiation) and continuously up to 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Additionally, patients completed mobile ePRO questionnaires [(EORTC - QLQC30 and MY20) and brief pain inventory scales (BPI)] using the Medidata application at baseline and after each induction cycle. Activity, sleep data, and completed ePRO questionnaire data were automatically synced or transferred to Medidata Rave database through Medidata Sensorlink technology. In this abstract, we report initial results on prospective collection of activity measurements. Additional data from the health-related quality of life questionnaires and clinical outcomes will be presented at later date. Results Between February 2017-March 2018, 37 patients (19 males and 18 females) enrolled onto the study, with 20 in cohort A and 17 in cohort B. The mean age was 55 years (range 41-64) for cohort A and 72 years (range 65-82) for cohort B. Treatment regimens included Carfilzomib/Revlimid/Dexamethasone 14(38%), Velcade/Revlimid/Dexamethasone 10(27%), Daratumumab/Carfilzomib Revlimid/Dexamethasone, 7(19%), Cyclophosphamide/Velcade/Dexamethasone 3(8%), Revlimid/Dexamethasone 2(5%), and Velcade/Revlimid/Dexamethasone-Lite 1(3%). Twenty-four patients have completed the trial, and 7 remain active. Six patients came off-study due to the following reasons: lost devices (n=4), intolerable rash during cycle 3 (n=1), and incompletion of baseline activity (n=1). Three patients were excluded for incomplete data sets with no baseline data collection at the time of analysis. Fifteen patients were available for data review including 10 in cohort A and 5 in cohort B. Mean activity for cohort A was 6,437 steps/24 hr period (1,002 - 12,754) versus for cohort B was 3,218.37 steps/24 hr period (387 - 6,155) (p <0.05). In comparing pre- and post-therapy, overall mean activity for cohort A increased from 5,995 to 6,513 steps/24 hr, 8.6% increase (p=0.78), and for cohort B mean activity increased from 2,249 to 3,420 steps/24 hr, a 52% increase (p=0.2140). We assessed short term effects therapy initiation had on activity for NDMM patients by comparing percent changes in activity (steps/24 hrs) from baseline period to cycle 1 period. We found 3 patients had a >100% increase, 1 patient had 50-100% increase, and 11 patients had within +/- 50% change in activity from baseline. Conclusion Electronic mobile wearable device monitoring in symptomatic NDMM patients may be a useful tool to assess a patient's overall wellness and health as they are receiving chemotherapy. For three patients, we were able to capture a dramatic increase in activity after initiation of treatment. Overall activity in the elderly NDMM patients is decreased compared to younger patients. Mobile wearable monitoring may be an even more useful strategy for tracking elderly and unfit patients that are more prone to side effects, where the balance of response versus quality of life is paramount. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Mailankody: Physician Education Resource: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding. Hassoun:Oncopeptides AB: Research Funding. Lesokhin:Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix, inc.: Patents & Royalties: Royalties; Janssen: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: CAR T cell therapies for MM, Research Funding. Shah:Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Landgren:Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy. Korde:Amgen: Research Funding.

ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) Vs Imatinib (IM) In Patients (pts) With Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and The Impact Of Early Molecular Response (EMR) and Sokal Risk At Diagnosis On Long-Term Outcomes

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 92-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Saglio ◽  
Andreas Hochhaus ◽  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Richard E. Clark ◽  
Hirohisa Nakamae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Eligibility Criterion ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction Frontline NIL continues to show benefit over IM in pts with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) CML-CP, with higher rates of major molecular response (MMR; BCR-ABLIS ≤ 0.1%) and MR4.5 (BCR-ABLIS ≤ 0.0032%), lower rates of progression to accelerated phase (AP)/blast crisis (BC) and fewer new BCR-ABL mutations on treatment in the Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in Clinical Trials–Newly Diagnosed Pts (ENESTnd) trial. Here, we report data with a minimum follow-up (f/u) of 4 y; updated data based on 5 y of f/u will be presented. Methods Adults with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP (N = 846) were randomized to NIL 300 mg twice daily (BID; n = 282), NIL 400 mg BID (n = 281), or IM 400 mg once daily (QD; n = 283). Progression and overall survival (OS) events were collected prospectively during study f/u, including after discontinuation of study treatment. Efficacy in the NIL 300 mg BID and IM arms was evaluated based on achievement of EMR (BCR-ABLIS ≤ 10% at 3 mo). Results At 4 y, ≥ 87% of pts remained on study in each arm and 57%-69% remained on core treatment (Table). Rates of MMR and MR4.5 by 4 y were significantly higher with NIL vs IM. Significantly fewer pts progressed to AP/BC on NIL vs IM (on core treatment: 0.7%, 1.1%, and 4.2%; on study: 3.2%, 2.1%, and 6.7% [NIL 300 mg BID, NIL 400 mg BID, and IM arms, respectively]). Of 17 pts across the 3 arms who progressed on core treatment, 11 (65%) had never achieved complete cytogenetic response and none had achieved MR4.5. Fewer mutations have emerged in the NIL arms vs the IM arm; in y 4, mutations emerged in 2 pts (1 pt with T315I on NIL 300 mg BID; 1 pt with F317L on IM). More pts achieved EMR in the NIL 300 mg BID arm vs the IM arm (91% vs 67%). Pts with EMR had significantly higher rates of progression-free survival (PFS) and OS at 4 y vs pts with BCR-ABL > 10% at 3 mo. Among pts with BCR-ABL > 10% at 3 mo, more progressions to AP/BC occurred in the IM arm (n = 14) vs the NIL 300 mg BID arm (n = 2); half of these pts progressed between 3 and 6 mo. In pts with intermediate or high Sokal risk, PFS and OS at 4 y were higher in both NIL arms vs the IM arm. No new safety signals were detected. Selected cardiac and vascular events were more common on NIL vs IM (by 4 y, peripheral arterial occlusive disease [PAOD] in 4 [1.4%], 5 [1.8%], and 0 pts; ischemic heart disease [IHD] in 11 [3.9%], 14 [5.1%,] and 3 [1.1%] pts; and ischemic cerebrovascular events in 3 [1.1%], 5 [1.8%], and 1 [0.4%] pts in the NIL 300 mg BID, NIL 400 mg BID, and IM arms, respectively). In the NIL 300 mg BID arm, 2 of 11 IHD events occurred between 3 and 4 y (all 4 PAOD events occurred in the first 2 y). In the NIL 400 mg BID arm, 2 of 5 PAOD events and 3 of 14 IHD events occurred between 3 and 4 y. Most pts (7 of 9) with a PAOD event on NIL were at high risk due to a combination of baseline risk factors. Conclusions NIL, a standard-of-care frontline therapy option for newly diagnosed CML-CP pts, affords superior efficacy compared with IM, including higher rates of EMR (which is associated with improved long-term outcomes), higher rates of MR4.5 (a key eligibility criterion for many studies of treatment-free remission), and a lower risk of disease progression. NIL continues to show good tolerability with long-term f/u. While selected cardiac and vascular events (including PAOD) are slightly more frequent on NIL vs IM, no increase in annual incidence of these events over time has been observed. Disclosures: Saglio: ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hochhaus:Ariad: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Hughes:Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL: Research Funding. Clark:Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Nakamae:Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, travel/ accomodations/ meeting expenses Other. Kim:BMS, Novartis,IL-Yang: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Etienne:Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Flinn:Novartis: Research Funding. Lipton:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Moiraghi:Bristol Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Fan:Novartis: Employment. Menssen:Novartis: Employment. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Larson:Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy.

What Is the Impact on Quality of Life of Various Treatments in Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome? Rethinking the Goals

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2112-2112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara M. Tinsley ◽  
Brent J Small ◽  
Jeffrey E Lancet ◽  
Susan C McMillan ◽  
Rami S. Komrokji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Intensive Therapy ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Pathology Report ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction: Treatment decisions are difficult for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Few studies address the impact of treatment on QOL. Both AML and high-risk MDS occur most frequently in the sixth and seventh decades of life, and are associated with a poor prognosis with median survival of one year or less. A primary goal of treatment is to improve quality of life (QOL) because cure is improbable. This was a longitudinal cohort study to compare QOL between groups receiving intensive therapy, non-intensive therapy, and supportive care. The sample consisted of 85 patients 60 years of age and older diagnosed high risk MDS and AML recruited from Moffitt Cancer Center from 12/2013 until 4/2015. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) was used to measure QOL. Study aims were to: 1) To compare the difference in QOL scores measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Leukemia version for intensive chemotherapy, non-intensive therapy and supportive care within 7 days of new treatment, or decision to pursue supportive care, and one month or later; 2) To determine QOL predictors of AML and high risk MDS from age, comorbidity, fatigue, and diagnosis; 3) To test the moderating effect of treatment with age, comorbidity, and fatigue on QOL. See figure 1. Methods: Recruitment of 85 patients with high risk MDS and AML occurred at the time of appointments in the Hematology Clinic or during admission to Moffitt Cancer Center for induction chemotherapy. Inclusion criteria included patients 60 years of age and older with confirmed diagnosis of high-risk MDS or AML based on bone marrow pathology report. High-risk MDS and AML were treatedas one group. Patients were able to read, write, and speak English, were orientedto person, place, and time, and werewilling to participate. Quality of life was assessedat the time of enrollment and within at least one month of enrollment using the FACT-Leu. Fatigue was measuredusing the Brief Fatigue Inventory, a one page, nine-item questionnaire, which measures fatigue on a scale of zero to ten, with zero indicating no fatigue, and ten representing the worst fatigue that a person can imagine. Measurement of number of comorbidities was performedat the time of enrollment using the Charlson comorbidity index. Baseline information obtained on all subjects included age, as measured by date of birth, and diagnosis from pathology report including chromosome analysis. Demographic data collected included gender, marital status, level of education, income level, religious ceremony attendance on a scale of zero to four, and designation of intensive, non-intensive, or supportive care treatment. Results: The first aim, a comparison of QOL scores from week 1 to week 4, was analyzed with repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). The supportive care group was not included in the analysis because of low accrual. Results indicated that there was a significant group by time interaction (with p=.040). Follow up tests revealed that the intensive treatment group had a significant improvement in their QOL scores at 1 month post treatment (p=.020). The second aim, evaluation of predictors of QOL was conducted using Pearson's correlations with age, comorbidity, fatigue, and diagnosis with significant correlations found between fatigue and QOL (r=-.693, p< .001). These findings identify an important relationship between fatigue and QOL. This was a negative correlation, showing that as fatigue increased QOL decreased. The third aim was explored using regression with Hayes (2013) application for moderation analysis. Scores for QOL for age, comorbidity, and fatigue were not moderated by treatment. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the most intensive treatment approach improves QOL. In addition, fatigue is a significant predictor of QOL. As fatigue increased, QOL scores decreased. Additional studies with a larger, more diverse sample are needed to explore the relationship between treatment approaches and QOL. In addition, intervention studies can be developed in AML and high risk MDS focused on fatigue management. It is anticipated that the results of this study will be used to inform patients and health care providers when making decisions concerning treatment based on QOL outcomes. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Lancet: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy; Kalo-Bios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Komrokji:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incite: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Research Funding. List:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Evaluation of Health Related Questionnaire Among Mycosis Fungoides and Lymphomatoid Papulosis

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5603-5603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakhshandra Talpur ◽  
Iris Wieser ◽  
Casey Wang ◽  
Lyons Genevieve ◽  
Madeleine Duvic
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Mycosis Fungoides ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Function Score ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Function

Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Mycosis Fungoides (MF) andlymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) are relatively rare and itchy skin disorders. The cosmetic disfigurement and severe pruritus dramatically affects the patient's quality of life. The focus is to examine the validity and reliability of the skindex-29, M.D. Anderson symptom inventory (MDASI) and itch-related quality of life (IQOL) questionnaire in 62 patients in a phase II trial of Brentuximab Vedotin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients completed survey questionnaires related to symptoms and quality-of-life several times over the course of Brentuximab Vedotin. We compared patients' baseline scores to their end-of-study (EOS) scores. Patients were grouped by diagnosis into Mycosis Fungoides and Lymphomatoid papulosis group. Questionnaires included skindex-29, focusing on the skin conditions the patient was bothered the most. (MDASI) for patients with cancer and following the symptoms of cancer and the itchy quality of life (I-QoL) questionnaire was developed to measure the symptoms associated with cancer therapeutic agents and their effect on daily activities. Scoring for the Skindex-29, M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and the Quality of Life (QOL) survey were done according to the questionnaire specific scoring guide. Responses were compared between 2 groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS Questionnaires from 62 patients (23 LyP and 39 MF) were studied at baseline and end of study. Patients were 33 males and 29 females with median age of 60 years (range: 27-86 years). The median overall survival (OS) was significant P = 0.041, when comparing patients with MF to LyP. The median survival time for patients from time of diagnosis with MF was 14.66 years and LyP was not reached. There was no significant difference in progression free survival (PFS) between MF and LyP. The median number of Brentuximab Vedotin cycles was 7 (1-19). Skindex-29 scales, showed change in emotion scale and function scale from baseline to EOS, both groups had a decrease, patients with LyP had a larger decrease in emotion score (P = 0.069) and function score (P =0.096) over the course of the study. There was no difference in the symptom scale from baseline to EOS. The patients with LyP had a larger decrease in function score from baseline to EOS. When comparing patients with MF to those with LyP for MDASI, there is no evidence of a difference, from baseline to EOS, in either symptom severity or symptom interference in daily life. In the IQOL when comparing the LyP patients' QOL responses from baseline to EOS, did not show significant difference. Table 1. Change in Skindex-29 scales, by group Skindex Scale MF LYP p-value Change from baseline to end-of-study: N Median Min Max N Median Min Max Emotion 35 -10 -65 35 20 -22.50 -61.94 12.5 0.0698 Symptoms 35 -7.14 -46.43 42.86 20 -10.71 -53.57 28.57 0.4782 Function 35 -2.08 -50.38 27.08 20 -16.29 -44.70 14.58 0.0962 Table 2. Change in MDASI scales, by Diagnosis MDASI Scale Item MF LYP p-value Change from baseline to end-of-study: N Median Mean Std. Dev Range N Median Mean Std. Dev Range Severity 35 0.23 0.18 1.96 (-5.85, 3.15) 21 0.38 0.46 1.61 (-1.69, 5.0) 0.9595 Interference 35 0.17 0.06 3.07 (-9.17, 5.17) 19 0.0 0.11 1.59 (-3.0, 4.67) 0.6764 CONCLUSIONS A significant improvement in emotions and functional part of skindex-29 was observed when comparing patients with MF to patients with LyP. While both groups had a decrease, the patients with LyP had a larger decrease in emotion and function score over the course of the study. Disclosures Duvic: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rhizen Pharma: Research Funding; Allos (spectrum): Research Funding; Therakos: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Soligenics: Research Funding; Huya Bioscience Int'l: Consultancy; Spatz Foundation: Research Funding; MiRagen Therapeutics: Consultancy; Eisai: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Consultancy; Cell Medica Ltd: Consultancy; Tetralogics SHAPE: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Co: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Assessment of Quality of Life in the NCRI Spirit 2 Study Comparing Imatinib with Dasatinib in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4024-4024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander M. Labeit ◽  
Mhairi Copland ◽  
Leanne M. Cork ◽  
Corinne A. Hedgley ◽  
Letizia Foroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Well Being ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background: Imatinib and dasatinib are established drugs in the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Several studies, including SPIRIT2 have shown that first-line dasatinib (100mg once daily) has a superior complete cytogenetic and major molecular response rate compared to imatinib (400mg once daily), but no significant differences in progression-free or overall survival have been shown in any study. To date, there has been no direct comparison of quality of life (QoL) using generic and cancer-specific instruments for first-line treatment of chronic-phase CML with imatinib and dasatinib. SPIRIT2 (STI571 Prospective International Randomised Trial 2) is the first randomized clinical trial to incorporates generic and cancer-specific QoL measurement for first-line therapy. Methods: Quality of life is a secondary endpoint in the SPIRIT2 trial and has been assessed at baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months post trial entry and thereafter annually. The EQ-5D, FACT-G, FACT-BRM and the FACT-TOI have been used as QoL measures in this trial. The FACT-G covers cancer-specific QoL measure dimensions such as physical well-being, functional well-being, social and family well-being, emotional well-being and the FACT-BRM and the FACT-TOI different subsets of them. The QoL scores (EQ-5D, FACT-G, FACT-BRM, FACT-TOI) were calculated at different time points and comparison of the mean scores for both treatment groups was made. Results: A comparison between imatinib and dasatinib shows no significant difference in QoL in generic instruments and also in cancer-specific instruments. EQ-5D was 0.77 and 0.79 at baseline and 0.80 and 0.82 at one year for dasatinib and imatinib, respectively (2-3 basis points increase over 1 year). Similar results were obtained for the FACT-G, FACT-BRM and the FACT-TOI. There was a slight increase for the FACT-G (4-5 basis points), FACT-TOI (3-4 basis points) and FACT-BRM (8-10 basis points) after 1 year for both treatments, but this difference was not significant. The effects on the well-being and the emotional dimensions have been analysed for both drugs and there was no change over time, demonstrating results similar to the imatinib arm of the IRIS trial. Conclusions: Standard dose imatinib and dasatinib are both used as first-line treatments for CML and, despite different side effect profiles, there is no significant difference in QoL using the instruments described here between these two drugs over time. These data will allow the derivation of utility values to contribute to future health economic/technology appraisals. Additional analyses of how generic and cancer-specific measures of different QoL instruments change in CML patients over time in those patients that develop side effects, e.g. fluid retention with imatinib or pleural effusion with dasatinib will be presented. Disclosures Copland: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cork:BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Hedgley:Ariad: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Gills:Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Holyoake:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bescoby:Roche: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Pocock:Janssen: Honoraria. Clark:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pzifer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. O'Brien:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pzifer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax Combination Yields Comparable Outcomes to CPX-351 in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3895-3895
Author(s):  
Hannah Asghari ◽  
Dasom Lee ◽  
Yehuda E. Deutsch ◽  
Onyee Chan ◽  
Najla Al Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background The therapeutic landscape for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has become complex with recent drug approvals. CPX-351 has become standard-of-care for patients (pts) with therapy-related AML and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. Moreover, earlier phase studies combining hypomethylating agents (HMA) and Venetoclax (HMA+Ven) in the frontline setting for elderly patients have demonstrated high response rates and improved survival. Given the overlapping indications, yet lack of comparative outcome data between these therapeutic regimens, treatment decisions have become challenging in the frontline setting. Therefore, we compared the outcomes of newly diagnosed AML pts receiving HMA+Ven vs. CPX-351. Methods We retrospectively annotated 119 pts that received frontline treatment with HMA+Ven and CPX-351 at Moffitt Cancer Center and Memorial Healthcare System between 2013 and 2019. Pts were divided in two cohorts: HMA+Ven (Cohort A) or CPX-351(Cohort B). Via comprehensive chart review of each patient that received HMA+Ven, we further classified a subgroup of pts meeting criteria to receive CPX-351 as CPX-351eligible. Clinical and molecular data were abstracted for each patient in accordance with IRB requirements. Overall response rate (ORR) was the combined total of complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi), and morphologic leukemia free state (MLFS). Fisher's Exact method was used to determine significance. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate median overall survival (mOS) with log-rank test to determine significance. All p-values are two-sided. Results Out of 119 total pts, 41 pts received HMA+Ven (Cohort A) and 78 pts received CPX-351 (Cohort B) with baseline characteristics outlined in Table 1. Among 111 response evaluable pts, ORR was 64.1% in Cohort A, including 28.2% with CR and 28.2% with CRi (Table 2). ORR was 50.0% in Cohort B, comprised of CR in 29.2% and CRi in 18.1%. There was no difference in ORR between Cohort A and Cohort B (64.1% vs. 50%, p 0.17). A significantly greater fraction of pts in Cohort B underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) (24.4% vs. 2.4%, p=0.004). ORR was higher in pts with European LeukemiaNet (ELN)-defined favorable/intermediate (fav/int) risk compared to adverse risk group in Cohort A (100% vs. 58.3%, p=0.03), however there was no difference in Cohort B (52.6% vs. 49.1%, p=1.0). ORR was similar among adverse risk groups in both cohorts (58.3% in Cohort A vs. 49.1% in Cohort B, p=0.47). Among responders, median time to best response was significantly longer in Cohort A (61.0 days vs. 40.5 days, p<0.0001). Median duration of response was not reached (NR) in both cohorts. Impact of somatic mutations on ORR is represented in Figure 3. Median follow-up was 6.5 months (mo) in Cohort A and 13.0mo in Cohort B. Median OS was similar in both cohorts (A vs. B, 13.8mo vs. 11.1mo, p=0.82) (Figure 1). Among responders, mOS was NR in Cohort A and 18.2mo in Cohort B (p=0.88) (Figure 2). Compared to Cohort B, mOS was superior for pts with fav/int risk disease in Cohort A (14.2mo (B) vs. NR (A), p=0.045) and not different for adverse risk group (11.1mo (B) vs. 7.3mo (A), p=0.2). Prior HMA exposure was 26.8% in Cohort A and 29.5% in Cohort B for an antecedent hematologic malignancy, however it did not impact mOS (p=0.86) or ORR (p=0.7). Early mortality rates for Cohort A and B were similar at day 30 (2.4% vs. 0%) and day 60 (4.9% vs. 3.8%). Rate of relapse was similar between cohorts A and B (16.0% vs. 30.6%, p=0.24). We then compared the outcomes of pts in Cohort B to CPX-351eligible arm from Cohort A (n=14). ORR and mOS were similar in Cohort B and CPX-351 eligible arm (ORR: 50% vs. 50%, p=1.0; mOS 11.1mo vs. 13.8mo, p=0.43). Only 1 patient (7.1%) of the CPX-351eligible arm underwent allo-SCT. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that HMA+Ven results in comparable response rates and survival outcomes to patients receiving CPX-351 when used as an initial remission therapy for patients with newly diagnosed AML, however the median follow up for patients receiving HMA+Ven was short. Survival did not appear to be impacted by a significantly greater proportion of patients proceeding to allo-SCT in the CPX-351 arm. Overall, HMA+Ven may represent a reasonable frontline remission therapeutic choice in patients with AML and a randomized trial would seem justified. Disclosures Kuykendall: Abbvie: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria. List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lancet:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services . Sallman:Celyad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji:celgene: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy. Sweet:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stemline: Consultancy; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau. Talati:Agios: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Do Not Miss Karyotyping at Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Diagnosis: An Italian Campus CML Study on the Role of Complex Variant Translocations

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 43-44
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Bonifacio ◽  
Chiara Elena ◽  
Mariella D'Adda ◽  
Luigi Scaffidi ◽  
Mairi Pucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Optimal Response ◽  
Frontline Treatment ◽  
Tki Treatment

Background. The Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome (chr.) is the hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and typically results from the reciprocal translocation t(9;22)(q34;11.2). Complex variant translocations (CVT) involving one or more additional chr. are identified in less than 5% of newly diagnosed CML. There are conflicting reports about the prognostic impact of CVT in the achievement of optimal response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and very few studies addressed the role of frontline treatment with imatinib or second generation (2G)-TKI in patients with CVT. Aims. To assess the response to imatinib or 2G-TKI in a large cohort of newly diagnosed CML with CVT, and to explore the impact of the different chr. translocations on outcome. Methods. This observational retrospective study was conducted in 19 hematologic centers in the framework of Campus CML, a network of Italian physicians involved in the management of CML patients. All newly diagnosed CML from 2000 to 2019 were evaluated and patients with CVT were selected for the present analysis. Karyotypes were defined according to the 2016 International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Responses to frontline treatment were retrospectively categorized according to the 2013 ELN recommendations, as they include cytogenetic milestones. Deep molecular response (DMR, i.e. MR4or better) was defined as BCR-ABLIS ratio ≤0.01% or undetectable disease with ≥10,000 ABL copies. Patients with DMR lasting ≥2 years and at least a Q-PCR test every 6 months were defined as stable DMR responders. Failure-free survival (FFS) was calculated from the start of frontline TKI treatment to progression to advanced phase, death, or switch to other treatments for resistance. For FFS calculation, patients were censored at TKI stop for treatment-free remission (TFR) or in case of switch for intolerance only. Differences between subgroups according to the partner chr. were presented for descriptive purposes. Results. CVT were identified in 109 (3.2%) patients from a whole population of 3,361 subjects with newly diagnosed CML. Ninety-five out of 109 patients (87%) exhibited three-way translocations, with chr. 1, 4, 6, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15 and 17 representing the most common additional partners (figure). Four- and five-way translocations were identified in 13 and 1 patients, respectively. Additional chr. abnormalities (ACA) in the Ph+ cells were observed in 15/109 (13.8%) patients and were more common in older individuals (p=0.018). Overall, median age at diagnosis was 50.6 years (range 20-90). Risk distribution according to the ELTS score was 54%, 28% and 8% for L, I and H risk, respectively (10% missing). Cytogenetic result was available before the choice of frontline treatment in 45% of cases and represented a decisive factor in 28% of them (i.e. clinicians selected a 2G-TKI or high-dose imatinib, according to the available options). Frontline TKI treatment was imatinib in 80 cases (73%) and 2G-TKI (nilotinib n=22, dasatinib n=6, bosutinib n=1) in the remaining cases. The frequency of optimal response at 3, 6 and 12 months was 48%, 45% and 53%, respectively, for imatinib-treated patients, and 76%, 83% and 76%, respectively, for the 2G-TKI cohort (p&lt;0.05 for all comparisons). Stable DMR was achieved by 39% of patients and 42% of them attempted a TFR. After a median follow-up of 91.3 months (range 1-236), 5-year FFS was 66% (95%CI: 53.4-76.4) and 84% (95%CI: 62.4-93.6) for imatinib and 2G-TKI treated patients, respectively (p=ns). The estimated 10-year OS for the entire cohort was 84.4% (95%CI: 73.6-91). The subtype of CVT had an impact on response and long-term outcome. Patients with CVT involving chr. 1, 4, 6, 11 or 12 had a higher frequency of MMR at 12 months than patients with CVT involving chr. 10, 14, 15 or 17 (75.8% vs 30.4%, respectively, p=0.001), higher frequency of stable DMR (48.7% vs 22.2%, respectively; p=0.04) and tended to have better median FFS (p=0.07), regardless of the type of frontline TKI and of the ELTS score. Conclusions. Due to its retrospective nature, this study does not allow to define which is the optimal therapy for CML harboring CVT at diagnosis. However, our data reinforce the usefulness of bone marrow karyotyping in CML. The observed differences between partner chr. may also depend on the breaking points, which are variable. Further dissection of CVT will help to identify which are associated to a poor response to TKIs. Figure Disclosures D'Adda: Incyte: Other: Advisory board; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory board. Galimberti:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria. Crugnola:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Bocchia:Incyte: Honoraria; CELGENE: Honoraria. Krampera:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Breccia:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Saglio:Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Quality of Life and Caregiver Burden in Patients and Their Caregivers Undergoing Outpatient Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Compared to Inpatient Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 62-62
Author(s):  
Vinita Dhir ◽  
Lara Zibdawi ◽  
Harminder K Paul ◽  
Osvaldo Espin-Garcia ◽  
Christine I Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Indirect Costs ◽  
Opportunity Costs ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lost Opportunity ◽  
Out Of Pocket Costs

Introduction Outpatient autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has become standard of care in many centres due to limited inpatient resources and rising financial constraints. Outpatient ASCT involves family members/friends assuming some patient care responsibilities during the acute transplant period. Although this may be associated with reduced direct medical costs, little work has been done to ascertain the "out of pocket costs" and "lost opportunity costs" to patients and their caregivers. Outpatient transplantation is perceived to provide superior quality of life (QOL) for patients, but there is little evidence to support this. In addition to patients' QOL, there is limited data on the impact of these treatments on caregivers' QOL. Thus, our objectives were to compare the QOL of patients and their caregivers undergoing outpatient and inpatient ASCT, and to quantify indirect costs to them. Methods This is a single centre cohort study of consecutive patients with lymphoma and plasma cell disorders undergoing ASCT at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from April 2016 - July 2019. Patients without a primary caregiver were still eligible to complete the QOL portion of the study. All patients completed four questionnaires: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT); FACT-Fatigue (FACT-F); EQ-5D-3L; and a distress impact thermometer. Clinically meaningful differences between the groups and serially were defined as ≥ 4 points on the FACT-BMT and FACT-F, and ≥0.08 on the EQ-5D-3L. Caregivers completed three questionnaires: Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Care (C-QOLC), a distress impact thermometer, and a caregiver self-administered financial expenditure survey (C-SAFE). Indirect costs were defined as lost opportunity costs (i.e., wages) and out-of-pocket costs (e.g., parking, accommodations). Questionnaires were completed at 5 time points: D0 (prior to ASCT), D+7, D+14 (discharge from daily visits), D+28 (discharge from ASCT) and D+100 (follow-up). Results In total, 68 patients have been enrolled to date (41 outpatients and 27 inpatients), and 54 caregivers (38 outpatients and 16 inpatients). Median patient age was 57 yrs (range: 18-71), and 66% were male. Of the 68 patients, 69% had a diagnosis of multiple myeloma and 31% lymphoma. Majority of caregivers were spouses (74%). In the overall sample, FACT-F scores (fatigue) increased significantly at D+7, D+14, and D+28, with improvement at D+100 (all p&lt;0.05 and clinically meaningful). Compared to inpatients, outpatients had higher fatigue levels at D+7 and D+14 that were statistically significant (Figure 1), with D+14 being clinically significant as well. For all patients, QOL scores by FACT-BMT declined at D+7, but then improved to above baseline values at D+100 (p&lt;0.05) (Table 1). On the EQ-5D-3L, patients' self-reported overall best imaginable health status decreased at D+7 and D+14 relative to baseline (p&lt;0.05); no significant difference was observed at D+28 and D+100 (Figure 1). Health utility scores were also calculated from the EQ-5D-3L. There were no significant trends in the overall sample, but when comparing the two groups, outpatients had lower measures at D+14 that were statistically and clinically relevant. With respect to caregiver QOL, in the entire sample, QOL was higher at D+100 relative to baseline (p&lt;0.05) (Figure 2). There were no differences between the two groups. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in lost opportunity costs (wages) between the two groups, however there was a trend towards higher lost opportunity costs in outpatient caregivers in the early ASCT process (D0, D+7, D+14). The mean overall costs (burden) for the primary caregiver in the acute first 100d phase of ASCT was C$4475. The indirect out-of-pocket costs by caregivers varied greatly, with an average of $58 at baseline (range $0-455) and $121 at D+28 (range $0-710). Conclusions There was significant deterioration of various QOL measures in all patients, irrespective of outpatient or inpatient status. Outpatients, however, reported significantly higher fatigue levels at D+7 and D+14. Caregiver QOL appears comparable between the two modalities, and appears to improve significantly by the follow-up period. The financial burden on caregivers, mostly driven by lost opportunity costs (wages), is high, with a trend towards higher burden in outpatient caregivers in the early parts of ASCT. Disclosures Chen: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Kridel:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Kuruvilla:Celgene: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Gilead: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Reece:Otsuka: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Tiedemann:Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Trudel:Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria. Prica:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

scholarly journals IPH4102; An Anti-KIR3DL2 Monoclonal Antibody in Refractory Sezary Syndrome: Results from a Multicenter Phase 1 Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 684-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine Bagot ◽  
Pierluigi Porcu ◽  
Basem M. William ◽  
Maxime Battistella ◽  
Maarten Vermeer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Aims: Sezary Syndrome (SS) is the most aggressive form of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL), characterized with high blood involvement and expression of Killer cell immunoglobulin like receptor 3DL2 (KIR3DL2). IPH4102 is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody that targets KIR3DL2. Very limited effective treatment options are available for SS patients with refractory disease. We conducted a phase 1 study testing IPH4102 in patients with refractory CTCL. Here we report results from the SS subset. Methods: IPH4102-101 study is a multicenter phase I trial composed of a dose escalation and cohort expansion portions that evaluated IPH4102 in patients with refractory CTCL. Key eligibility criteria included failure of ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. KIR3DL2 testing was performed for all patients at baseline and at different time points throughout the study. IPH4102 was given Q1w x 4 weeks, followed by Q2w x 10 weeks then Q4w until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint is safety. Main 2ry endpoints include best global response (BGR) using the Olsen criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), quality of life (QOL) and biomarker analyses. Results: The study included 35 SS patients, 20 in the dose escalation and 15 in the cohort expansion, with a median age of 70 years (37-90). Median time from initial SS diagnosis to starting IPH4012 was 22.8 months. Nineteen patients (54%) received IPH4102 as ≥ 4th line of systemic therapy and 7 (20%) were previously treated with mogamulizumab. Thirteen patients (37%) had lymph node involvement as per investigator assessment and based on radiological examination while 7 patients (20%) had evidence of large cell transformation. KIR3DL2 expression was observed in either skin or blood in 33 patients (94%) and in both in 28 patients (80%). Most common adverse events (AEs) were asthenia (26%), peripheral edema (26%), and fatigue (23%), which were all grade 1-2. Possibly related grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed in 7 patients (20%), and only 2 patients (6%) stopped treatment for an AE. Table 1 shows BGR and response by compartment. Overall response rate was 42.9% [95% CI: 28.0% - 59.1%], with median time to response of 4.8 months. Median DOR and PFS were 5.6 months [95% CI: 3.2-not reached] and 12.8 months [95% CI: 8.1-not reached], respectively. Mogamulizumab pretreated patients showed BGR, median DOR and PFS of 42.9%, 13.8 and 20.9 months, respectively. Quality of life assessment was performed using the Pruritus VAS score andSkinDex29. Patients with CR, PR or SD showed marked improvement overtime of all evaluated parameters including SkinDex29 global, symptoms, emotional, and functional scores. Biomarker analysis showed progressive decrease in CD4/CD8 ratio in responding patients. The decrease of KIR3DL2+ expressing cells in skin evaluated by immunohistochemistry at week 5 and 14 was able to predict BGR (AUC=0.749, 0.714, respectively). Figure 1 shows reduction in KIR3DL2 expressing cells at week 5 and week 14 in a patient who had PR as BGR. To date, 9 patients are still ongoing treatment. Updated clinical and correlative research analyses will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: IPH4102 is highly effective in patients with refractory SS. It induces meaningful clinical activity and improves quality of life placing it as an encouraging treatment option for these patients. Further development in SS and other T-cell malignancies is underway. Disclosures Bagot: Actelion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Porcu:Innate Pharma: Consultancy. Khodadoust:Innate Pharma: Research Funding. Sicard:Innate Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Azim:Innate Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kim:miRagen: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin-Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document