Relative Survival and Incidence Based Mortality of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in Rituximab Era: Population Based Study From Modena Cancer Registry (MCR)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 5185-5185
Author(s):  
Luigi Marcheselli ◽  
Raffaella Marcheselli ◽  
Alessia Bari ◽  
Claudia Cirilli ◽  
Eliana Valentina Liardo ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5185 BACKGROUND. In the last 10 years retrospective studies and randomized clinical trial showed an improvement of survival in patients with Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) and Follicular Lymphoma (FL) treated with chemotherapy regimens containing rituximab (R). However, clinical trials based data refer to a very selective subgroup of patients that does not necessarily correspond to the general population. Therefore we analysed data available from the cancer registry of the province of Modena (MCR), Italy, where R was introduced as standard treatment of DLBCL starting from 2003. Aim of this study was to evaluate if the survival benefit of R treatment observed in clinical trials in patients with DLBCL was confirmed in a study population METHODS. From 1996 to 2008 we identified 662 metachronous DLBCL (ICDO3 histology codes 9678–9680 6984/3) that were divided in two groups: 345 patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2002 (before the use of R), and 317 from 2003 to 2008 (when R was routinely used in the province of Modena). Relative survival (RS) was estimated using the Hakulinen method, with the complete cohort approach and age-adjusted by Corazziari method. The relative risks (RR) by gender and year of diagnosis (1996–2002 vs 2003–2008) was estimated assuming Poisson distribution for excess deaths. Moreover, by means of incidence based mortality approach (IBM) we estimated the overall effect of introduction of the R with the rate mortality ratio (RMR) between the cohort 2004–2007 (last follow-up 2008, N=198) and 1998–2001 (last follow-up 2002, N=200), and the effect by gender and age at diagnosis (<70 and ≥70 years old). Mortality data were extracted from MCR using the ICD9 codes 200 and 202. For all estimates we reported the confidence intervals at 95% (95%IC). RESULTS. The cohort consisted of 662 patients recorded in MCR in the period 1996–2008 (last data of follow-up is 31/12/2009) 51% of which were male and 47% ≥70 years old. The population of the province of Modena in 2008 was 677,896 (about 1.1% of Italian population). Overall, the RS in the period 2003–2008 and 1996–2002 was 61.0% (95%IC:53.8–67.9%) and 43.1% (95%IC: 37.0–49.1%), respectively (RR 0.63, P<0.001). The RS of male gender in 2003–2008 was 62.1% (95%IC: 51.6–71.8%) compared with 38.0% (95%CI: 29.8–46.6%) in the period 1996–2002 (RR=0.56, P<0.001); the RS for female was 58.7% (95%IC: 48.2–68.2%) in the period 2003–2008 and 48.1% (95%CI: 39.4–56.6%) in the period 1996–2002 (RR=0.71, P=0.047). Overall, from IBM analysis the RMR between period 2004–2008 vs 1998–2001 was 0.68 (95%CI: 0.50–0.94, P=0.018). From the same comparison for age <70, RMR was 0.56 (95%CI: 0.33–0.96, P=0.034) and for age ≥70 RMR was 0.74 (95%CI: 0.49–1.09, P=0.128). For male gender RMR was 0.71 (95%CI: 0.46–1.11, P=0.132) and for female was 0.65 (95%CI 0.41–1.03, P=0.068). CONCLUSIONS. This population based study includes exclusively patients with DLBCL, many of which would not have met the trial inclusion criteria, thus reflecting the experience of everyday clinical practice in a homogenous geographic area. Our results show an improvement in survival after the introduction of R for the treatment of DLBCL, that confirms the data from clinical trials and the population based study of LH Sehn (1). Furthermore, using IBM method the RMR highlighted an overall decrease of mortality in the “R period” compared to the period “before R”. This is particularly evident for patients younger than 70 and, with a minor effect, in the female gender. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: the study has been supported by “Associazione Angela Serra per la Ricerca sul Cancro”, Italy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (34) ◽  
pp. 3993-3998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly ◽  
Lasse Hjort Jakobsen ◽  
Martin Hutchings ◽  
Peter de Nully Brown ◽  
Herman Nilsson-Ehle ◽  
...  

Purpose Routine imaging for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in first complete remission (CR) is controversial and plays a limited role in detecting relapse. This population-based study compared the survival of Danish and Swedish patients with DLBCL for whom traditions for routine imaging have been different. Patients and Methods Patients from the Danish and Swedish lymphoma registries were included according to the following criteria: newly diagnosed DLBCL from 2007 to 2012, age 18 to 65 years, and CR after R-CHOP/CHOEP. Follow-up for Swedish patients included symptom assessment, clinical examinations, and blood tests at 3- to 4-month intervals for 2 years, with longer intervals later in follow-up. Imaging was only recommended when relapse was clinically suspected. Follow-up for Danish patients was similar but included routine imaging (usually computed tomography every 6 months for 2 years). Results Danish (n = 525) and Swedish (n = 696) patients with DLBCL had comparable baseline characteristics. Cumulative 2-year progression rate after CR was 6% (95% CI, 4 to 9) for International Prognostic Index (IPI) ≤ 2 versus 21% (95% CI, 13 to 28) for IPI > 2. Age > 60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6 to 3.4), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.8), B symptoms (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2 (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.0) were associated with worse post-CR survival. Imaging-based follow-up strategy had no impact on survival, neither for all patients nor for IPI-specific subgroups. Conclusion DLBCL relapse after first CR is infrequent, and the widespread use of routine imaging in Denmark did not translate into better survival. This favors follow-up without routine imaging and, more generally, a shift of focus from relapse detection to improved survivorship.


2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 2798-2801
Author(s):  
Lasse Hjort Jakobsen ◽  
Jorne Lionel Biccler ◽  
Peter de Nully Brown ◽  
Judit Mészáros Jørgensen ◽  
Pär Lars Josefsson ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 924-932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustaf Hedström ◽  
Stefan Peterson ◽  
Mattias Berglund ◽  
Mats Jerkeman ◽  
Gunilla Enblad ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shing Fung Lee ◽  
Andrew Evens ◽  
Andrea Ng ◽  
Miguel-Angel Luque-Fernandez

Abstract The influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on access to standard chemotherapy and/or monoclonal antibody therapy, and associated secular trends, relative survival, and excess mortality, among diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients is not clear. We conducted a Hong Kong population-based cohort study and identified adult patients with histologically diagnosed DLBCL between 2000 and 2018. We examined the association of SES levels with the odds and the secular trends of receipt of chemotherapy and/or rituximab. Additionally, we estimated the long-term relative survival by SES utilizing Hong Kong life tables. Among 4,017 patients with DLBCL, 2,363 (58.8%) patients received both chemotherapy and rituximab and 740 (18.4%) patients received chemotherapy alone, while 1,612 (40.1%) and 914 (22.8%) patients received no rituximab or chemotherapy, respectively. On multivariable analysis, low SES was associated with lesser use of chemotherapy (odd ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI 0.34–0.57) and rituximab (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.32–0.52). The socioeconomic disparity for either treatment showed no secular trend of change. Additionally, patients with low SES showed increased excess mortality, with a hazard ratio of 2.34 (95% CI, 1.67–3.28). Improving survival outcomes for patients with DLBCL requires provision of best available medical care and securing access to treatment regardless of patients’ SES.


2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 207-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bente Arboe ◽  
Maja Halgren Olsen ◽  
Jette Sønderskov Gørløv ◽  
Anne Katrine Duun-Henriksen ◽  
Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 533-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Varga ◽  
Christina Holcroft ◽  
Abbas Kezouh ◽  
Serghei Bucatel ◽  
Nathalie Johnson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document