Vantage 088: Vorinostat in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Global, Randomized Phase 3 Trial

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 811-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Chemotherapy Agents

Abstract Abstract 811 Introduction: Vorinostat (VOR), an oral inhibitor of histone deacetylase class I and class II proteins, regulates genes and proteins involved in tumor growth and survival. The synergistic effects of VOR and bortezomib (BTZ) have been shown in preclinical studies and were confirmed in independent phase 1 trials in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), producing objective response rates (ORRs) of up to 42% and overall clinical benefit of up to 90%. Materials and methods: Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years, had measurable secretory MM, had received 1 to 3 prior systemic anti-myeloma regimens, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status ≤ 2. Previous exposure to BTZ and the presence of extracellular plasmacytoma were allowed per protocol, but patients with prior resistance to BTZ were excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 21-day cycles of BTZ (1.3 mg/m2 intravenously; days 1, 4, 8, and 11) in combination with oral VOR 400 mg/d, or matching placebo, on days 1 to 14. Additional use of corticosteroids for the treatment of MM was not allowed during the trial. Patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoint for this trial was progression-free survival (PFS; occurrence of 412 PFS events). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included ORR (≥ partial response), clinical benefit response (ORR + minimal response), overall survival, time to progression, patient-reported outcomes questionnaires (QLQ-C30, QLQ-MY20), and safety/tolerability of this novel drug combination. Responses and progression were determined according to the European Bone and Marrow Transplantation Group criteria and will be confirmed by an Independent Adjudication Committee. Results: Between January 2009 and January 2011, 637 patients were enrolled from 174 centers in 33 countries across the globe making this trial one of the largest studies conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. Median age of the study population was 62 years (range, 29–86 years). Of the enrolled patients, 59% were male and 56% were Caucasian. Patients had received a median of 2 prior regimens (range, 1–3). Prior anti-myeloma agents included BTZ (24%), thalidomide (56%), lenalidomide (13%), melphalan (56%), and stem cell transplantation (35%). As of July 2011, 635 patients had received study medication, with a median exposure of 7 cycles (mean: 7.6 cycles; range 1–30 cycles). Reported median exposure to BTZ monotherapy in previous phase 3 trials was approximately 5 cycles. Conclusions: The study passed the protocol-specified futility analyses by the independent data monitoring committee in November 2010. Database lock is anticipated in November 2011, and top-line data on primary and secondary endpoints will be available at the meeting. Disclosures: Dimopoulos: Celgene, Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, is approved in the US for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have progressive, persistent or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. Vorinostat is currently under investigation for the treatment of relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma, relapsed/refractory B cell lymphoma (in combination with other chemotherapy agents), and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (in combination with bortezomib and other chemotherapy agents). Jagannath:Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yoon:Celgene: Consultancy; NK Bio: Consultancy. Siegel:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Hajek:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Merck: Educational lecture. Facon:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosiñol:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Blacklock:New Zealand Bone Marrow Donor Registry: Consultancy, Employment; Mercy Hospital, Auckland New Zealand: Consultancy; Leukaemia and Blood Foundation, New Zealand: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Middlemore Hospital: Employment, Research Funding. Goldschmidt:Amgen, Novartis, Chugai: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag, Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Palumbo:Merck: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Reece:Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding. Graef:Merck: Employment. Houp:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Sun:Merck & Co., Inc.: Employment. Eid:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Acetylon: founder.

Vantage 095: Vorinostat in Combination with Bortezomib in Salvage Multiple Myeloma Patients: Final Study Results of a Global Phase 2b Trial

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 480-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos ◽  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Jacob P. Laubach ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Histone Deacetylase ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Asia Pacific ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Chemotherapy Agents

Abstract Abstract 480 Introduction: Vorinostat (VOR), an oral inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC) class I and class II proteins, affects pathways regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis in a diverse array of tumor types. Phase 1/2 trials in multiple myeloma (MM) have indicated clinical activity of vorinostat, as both a single agent and in combination with bortezomib (BTZ) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). Materials and methods: The present study (MK-0683 PN095) was an open-label, single-arm phase 2b trial of VOR plus BTZ in BTZ-refractory patients (defined as < 25% response on therapy, or progression during or < 60 days after completion of therapy) and patients considered to be refractory, intolerant, or ineligible for IMiD-based therapy regimens. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years, had measurable secretory MM, had received ≥ 2 prior anti-myeloma regimens, and relapsed or progressed following prior systemic therapy. Patients received 21-day cycles of BTZ (1.3 mg/m2 intravenously [IV]; days 1, 4, 8, and 11) plus oral VOR 400 mg/d on days 1 to 14. If patient had no change as the best response after 4 cycles of treatment or progressive disease after 2 cycles of treatment, oral dexamethasone 20 mg on the day of and day after each dose of BTZ could be added to the treatment regimen. Patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; ≥ partial response). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included clinical benefit response (ORR + minimal response), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Responses and progression were determined according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria and the European Bone and Marrow Transplantation Group criteria. All efficacy data will be confirmed by an Independent Adjudication Committee. Results: Between January 2009 and October 2010, 143 patients were enrolled from 41 centers in 12 countries across Asia-Pacific, Europe, and North America. Median duration of MM for the entire study population was 4.6 years, including 31% whose disease had progressed on or within 60 days of last therapy and 66% whose disease had achieved < 25% response to the regimen immediately preceding study entry. The study population was heavily pretreated, having received a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range 2–17, ≥ 4 prior regimens: 69%). Prior anti-myeloma agents included 100% BTZ (median 2 prior regimens containing BTZ), 100% IMiDs (thalidomide [85%], lenalidomide [71%], or pomalidomide [4%]), and 74% stem cell transplant. As of July 2011, 142 of the enrolled patients received study medication, with a median exposure of 4 cycles (mean 6.2 cycles; range 1–26 cycles). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events regardless of relationship to study drug were predominantly hematologic and gastrointestinal disorders. Of interest, peripheral neuropathy was infrequent and grade ≥ 3 PN occurred in 2 patients (1.6%). The final efficacy evaluation of the IAC will occur in September 2011. Conclusions: Final data for all primary and secondary endpoints, including response assessment and time-to-event data for PFS/TTP, OS, and duration of response will be available at the annual ASH meeting. Disclosures: Siegel: Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, is approved in the US for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have progressive, persistent or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. Vorinostat is currently under investigation for the treatment of relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma, relapsed/refractory B cell lymphoma (in combination with other chemotherapy agents), and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (in combination with bortezomib and other chemotherapy agents). Dimopoulos:Celgene, Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Yoon:NK Bio: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Kaufman:Merck; Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium; Onxy; Novartis; Keryx: Consultancy. Goldschmidt:Amgen, Novartis, Chugai: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag, Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Reece:Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding. Leleu:Janssen Cilag, Celgene, Novartis-Amgen, Leo Pharma, Chugai, Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cavo:Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Graef:Merck: Employment. Houp:Merck: Employment. Sun:Merck & Co., Inc.: Employment. Howe:Merck: Employment. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Acetylon: .

Simulation of Clinical Outcome for Pomalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Refractory Multiple Myeloma Based on Week 8 M-Protein Response

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1881-1881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rene Bruno ◽  
Fredrik Jonsson ◽  
Mohamed Zaki ◽  
Christian Jacques ◽  
Arlene S Swern ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Modeling And Simulation ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Protein Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Multiple Myeloma Patient ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Abstract 1881 Background: Drug-disease modeling and simulation has recently been proposed to support drug development decisions in patients with liquid and solid tumors (Claret et al J Clin Oncol, 27:4103-4108, 2010; Wang et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 86:167-174, 2009). We hypothesized that similar modeling based on a decrease in M-protein may be applied in multiple myeloma. The objective was to use a modeling and simulation approach to leverage available lenalidomide multiple myeloma data and support pomalidomide development decisions by, 1) developing a drug-independent link between tumor burden reduction (as assessed by change from baseline in serum M-Protein) and survival and PFS and 2) simulating expected survival and PFS based on interim M-protein data of the phase 1/2 trial (CC-4047-MM02, NCT00833833) of pomalidomide (POM) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least 2 prior therapies including lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib. Methods: M-Protein measurements were modeled as a function of time from 704 patients included in two phase 3 clinical studies of LEN plus dexamethasone (DEX) vs. DEX (MM010, Dimopoulos, NEJM 357, 2123–2132, 2007 and MM009, Weber, NEJM 357, 2133–2142, 2007). Models were developed for survival and PFS times as a function of change in M-protein level at end-of-cycle 2 (week 8) from baseline as well as other prognostic factors. Interim M-protein data from the ongoing MM-002 POM study (217 patients) were modeled to simulate clinical endpoints. Results: Based on lenalidomide Phase 3 data, week-8 change in M-Protein (p < 0.00001), ECOG performance status (p < 0.0009), baseline albumin, hemoglobin and creatinine levels (p < 0.01) were significant independent predictors of survival when week-8 change in M-Protein (p < 0.00001) and baseline hemoglobin (p < 0.001) were significant independent predictors of PFS. Observed survival and PFS distributions over 100 weeks in lenalidomide studies and difference between the two treatments (LEN + DEX vs. DEX) were consistent with the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the models. Model predictions (95% PIs) of median survival and PFS based on week-8 change in M-Protein following treatment with POM and POM + DEX are presented in the table below. The recently disclosed observed medians and 95% CIs for all endpoints and all arms from MM-002 are included in the model. Conclusions: Change in M-protein level as a continuous longitudinal biomarker appears to be a potential indicator to assess drug effect in multiple myeloma studies using modeling and simulation based on early interim data. PFS predicted by the model and the actual PFS are similar and thus may support end-of-Phase 2 decision (Bruno et al Clin Pharmacol Ther 86:136-138, 2009). Current simulations indicate encouraging results for POM in a refractory multiple myeloma patient population who have received prior treatment that includes lenalidomide and bortezomib but these exploratory methods require confirmation as part of ongoing studies. Disclosures: Bruno: Pharsight: Employment; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide is not an FDA licensed product for multiple myeloma treatment. Jonsson:Pharsight: Employment; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Zaki:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Jacques:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Swern:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Richardson:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Claret:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharsight: Employment.

scholarly journals Characterization of the Incidence and Management of Gastrointestinal Toxicity in the Phase 3 Panorama 1 Study of Panobinostat Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2120-2120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Vania T M Hungria ◽  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Meral Beksac ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Complete Resolution ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Optimal Management ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Gi Toxicity

Abstract Introduction: In the randomized placebo controlled phase 3 trial PANORAMA 1 the pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi) panobinostat combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone (PAN-BTZ-Dex) led to a statistically significant and clinically relevant increase in progression free survival in patients (pts) with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (Pbo-BTZ-Dex; 12.0 vs 8.1 months; hazard ratio 0.63, P<0.0001). Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, particularly diarrhea, a known class-effect of pan-DACi and BTZ, was the most common non-hematologic adverse event (AE) observed in both treatment arms, occurring at a higher incidence in the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm. Optimal management of GI toxicity, especially diarrhea-related AEs, in pts who receive PAN-BTZ-Dex could help maximize treatment outcomes. Here we present a detailed analysis of pts with diarrhea on the PANORAMA 1 study to inform strategies to reduce the effects of diarrhea and improve efficacy. Methods: The PANORAMA 1 trial included 12 cycles of treatment with two treatment phases (TP1: eight 3-week cycles; TP2: four 6-week cycles). In TP1, pts were randomized to receive oral PAN (20 mg) or Pbo administered thrice weekly for the first 2 weeks, with intravenous BTZ (1.3 mg/m2) administered on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and Dex (20 mg) administered orally on the days of and after BTZ. In TP2 (for pts demonstrating clinical benefit), PAN or Pbo were administered similarly but BTZ was administered once-weekly (days 1, 8, 22 and 29) with Dex on the day of and after BTZ. For each cycle, prevalence and incidence for diarrhea AEs were determined; these were characterized by grade, improvement in grade, worsening of grade, and resolution of diarrhea. Results: In the PANORAMA 1 trial, a total of 260/381 (68.2%) pts treated with PAN-BTZ-Dex and 157/377 (41.6%) pts treated with Pbo-BTZ-Dex reported AEs of diarrhea; most were grade 1 or 2 (PAN-BTZ-Dex: 42.8% vs Pbo-BTZ-Dex: 33.7%). Grade 4 diarrhea was rare (PAN-BTZ-Dex: 1.3%; Pbo-BTZ-Dex: 0.5%). Dose adjustments/interruptions for diarrhea occurred in 26% on the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm and 9% on the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm. Treatment discontinuation due to diarrhea occurred in 4.5% on the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm and 1.6% on the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm. Serious AEs of diarrhea occurred in 11.3% on PAN-BTZ-Dex arm and 2.4% on Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm. There was no hemorrhagic diarrhea on the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm and in 1 pt in the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm. In the majority of pts (56.2%) in the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm, diarrhea occurred for the first time in cycles 1-4 and was primarily grade 1/2; first onset occurred rarely in TP2 (Figure). Cumulative incidence of diarrhea on the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm plateaued by cycle 6 (61.9% by cycle 6; 68.2% overall). The cumulative number of pts with complete resolution of diarrhea (defined as resolved diarrhea that did not recur on treatment) increased over the course of the study. During treatment, 67.7% (258/381) in PAN-BTZ-Dex arm had either no diarrhea or complete resolution of their diarrhea. Analysis of diarrhea management by grade and treatment phase revealed that most pts received medication to manage the diarrhea. Antidiarrheal medications were administered to 70.8% (184/260) pts with diarrhea across all grades; loperamide was used most commonly. However, many pts with grade 1/2 diarrhea had no action taken in TP1: grade 1 - 58% (115/198); grade 2 - 26% (33/127), suggesting suboptimal management of diarrhea. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that diarrhea in pts who received PAN-BTZ-Dex occurs primarily in the first 1-4 cycles of treatment with cumulative incidence reaching a plateau around cycle 6. Majority of pts with diarrhea had complete resolution during treatment. Although diarrhea was commonly observed in pts who received PAN-BTZ-Dex in the PANORAMA 1 trial, it was manageable and seldom led to treatment discontinuation; however, some pts with grade 1/2 diarrhea did not receive proactive management. Optimal management of diarrhea with prompt intervention including antidiarrheal medication and dose holds/adjustments of BTZ and PAN at the first sign of loose stools may help to maintain pts on therapy and thus improve outcomes with PAN-BTZ-Dex. Future trials should seek to employ these strategies for pts who experience GI toxicity, and should consider subcutaneous administration of BTZ. In addition, studies using combinatorial agents with less overlapping GI toxicity with PAN may further improve safety in this setting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Richardson: Takeda: Research Funding; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jedrzejczak:Amgen, Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Guenther:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Siritanaratkul:Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Schlossman:Millennium: Consultancy. Hou:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Sopala:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Panneerselvam:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Redhu:Novartis: Employment. Corrado:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Binlich:Novartis Pharma SAS: Employment.

Identification of Alpha 1-Acid Glycoprotein (AAG) As a Potential Patient Selection Biomarker for Improved Clinical Activity of the Novel KSP Inhibitor ARRY-520 in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1868-1868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Tunquist ◽  
Karin Brown ◽  
Gary Hingorani ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Abstract 1868 Background ARRY-520 is a kinesin spindle protein (KSP) inhibitor that has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Although ARRY-520 is administered IV, it displays variable pharmacokinetics (PK) among patients. The degree of binding of certain drugs to serum proteins can alter their free fraction (fu) and PK, with a possible impact on clinical activity. Alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) is an acute-phase reactant protein that is often elevated in the blood of patients with cancer, including multiple myeloma. We investigated the significance of the interaction of ARRY-520 with AAG, and other relevant blood proteins, using both in vitro models and clinical data. Methods Compound-protein binding was assessed using several in vitro assays. In addition, the effect of increasing concentrations of AAG on MM cell line viability was measured. Patient data were obtained from 3 clinical studies of ARRY-520: a Phase 1 solid tumor study, a Phase 1/2 AML study, and a Phase 1/2 study in MM. The MM Phase 2 portion consists of 2 separate, 2-stage cohorts. Cohort 1 evaluated ARRY-520 administered as a single agent, and cohort 2 investigated ARRY-520 in combination with low-dose dexamethasone (LoDex). The concentrations of multiple proteins, including AAG, and the degree of ARRY-520 total protein binding, were measured in pre- and post-dose blood samples for patients in the analysis. AAG levels in MM patients were further correlated with time-on-study and clinical response rate. Results ARRY-520 exhibits low micromolar affinity for AAG in in vitro assays, but not for other common serum proteins, such as albumin. To investigate whether AAG binding impacts biological activity, we found that increasing AAG concentrations within a clinically relevant range resulted in increasing IC50 values for ARRY-520 on MM cell line viability. Of other MM agents tested, none exhibited high affinity binding to AAG in vitro, and a range of AAG concentrations did not alter the cellular activity of these compounds. Pre-dose concentrations of AAG were measured using blood samples collected from patients on all 3 ARRY-520 studies (0.4 – 4.1 g/L AAG in solid tumor study; 0.5 – 2.4 g/L in AML study; 0.2 – 2.8 g/L in MM study). Post-dose blood samples from the MM study also indicated that AAG levels do not significantly change with time. The fu of ARRY-520 in blood was meaningfully reduced among patients with the highest AAG concentrations. Furthermore, AAG and fu were correlated with changes in clinical PK: CL and Vd decreased with increasing AAG, trends consistent with a lower fu. Among the MM patients, 72 patients were evaluable for AAG determination (27 from the dose-escalation portion, 27 from Cohort 1, and 18 from Stage 1 of Cohort 2). Across all of these cohorts, the group of patients with AAG above an empirically-determined cutoff of 1.1 g/L showed a decreased median time on study (1.5 months vs 4.7 months) and no clinical responses (0/19 vs 12/53) as compared to patients below this cutoff. For example, as reported separately, ARRY-520 in combination with LoDex showed a promising 22% overall response rate (≥PR) in the 1st-stage of Cohort 2. In this cohort, 6 patients were determined to have AAG concentrations above the empirical cutoff. None of these patients had clinical benefit. Excluding these 6 patients would significantly improve the overall response rate (≥PR) from 22% (4/18) to 33% (4/12). Summary AAG has been proposed as a prognostic marker for MM disease severitya. Our preliminary data suggest that AAG levels can affect the free fraction of ARRY-520 in blood over a clinically relevant range both preclinically and in clinical studies. In retrospective analysis, patients with higher AAG levels show a lower fu and therefore may not achieve sufficient exposure to gain therapeutic benefit from ARRY-520. In preclinical analyses, this effect is specific to ARRY-520, suggesting that AAG levels may be predictive for ARRY-520 activity relative to other MM drugs. We hypothesize that prospective screening for AAG may enable exclusion of patients who may not achieve therapeutic exposure to ARRY-520, increasing the overall activity of ARRY-520 and preventing exposure of non-responders to an ineffective therapeutic dose. Further, experiments are currently underway to investigate the relevance of other acute-phase proteins in blood. Disclosures: Tunquist: Array BioPharma: Employment. Off Label Use: ARRY-520 alone and with dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ARRY-520 is not currently approved for any indication. Brown:Array BioPharma: Employment. Hingorani:Array BioPharma: Employment. Lonial:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kaufman:Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Zonder:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Millenium: Honoraria, Research Funding. Orlowski:Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah:Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hilder:Array BioPharma: Employment. Ptaszynski:Array BioPharma: Consultancy. Koch:Array BioPharma: Employment. Litwiler:Array BioPharma: Employment. Walker:Array BioPharma: Employment.

Final Analysis of Overall Survival from the Phase 3 Panorama 1 Trial of Panobinostat Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3026-3026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús F. San-Miguel ◽  
Vania T.M. Hungria ◽  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Meral Beksac ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Study Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Panobinostat is a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi) that targets key aberrations in multiple myeloma (MM) cell biology, including epigenetics and protein metabolism. In the phase 3 clinical trial PANORAMA 1, panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (PAN-BTZ-Dex) led to a statistically significant and clinically relevant increase in progression-free survival of approximately 4 months compared with that with placebo plus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Pbo-BTZ-Dex). Further analyses of patient outcomes by prior treatment demonstrated that the magnitude of PFS benefit was greatest among patients who received at least 2 prior regimens, including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD; PAN-BTZ-Dex [n = 73]: 12.5 months [95% CI, 7.3-14.0 months]; Pbo-BTZ-Dex [n = 74]: 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.7-6.1 mo; HR 0.47 [95% CI, 0.32-0.72]). These data supported the regulatory approvals of PAN-BTZ-Dex for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who received at least 2 prior regimens, including bortezomib and an IMiD. Here we present the final analysis of overall survival (OS) for the entire patient population and among patients who received at least 2 prior regimens, including bortezomib and an IMiD. Methods: The study design for the PANORAMA 1 trial was described previously (San-Miguel. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1195-206). The key secondary endpoint was OS. As of June 29, 2015, the 415 events required to conduct the final analysis of OS had been observed. Kaplan-Meier estimation was utilized for OS analyses for the entire population (N = 768), the pre-specified subgroup of patients who received prior bortezomib and IMiD (n = 193), and patients who received at least 2 prior regimens including bortezomib and an IMiD (n = 147). Results: The median OS of patients who received PAN-BTZ-Dex in the overall population was 40.3 months (95% CI, 35.0-44.8 months) vs 35.8 months (95% CI, 29.0-40.6 months) for the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm with HR 0.94 [95% CI, 0.78-1.14], P = .5435 (Fig 1A). The percentage of patients in each arm who received post-study therapy was 37.7% in the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm and 48.8% in the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm. The median OS of patients who received at least 2 prior lines, including bortezomib and an IMiD, was 25.5 months (95% CI, 19.6-34.3 months) in the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm vs 19.5 months (95% CI, 14.1-32.5 months) in the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm (Fig. 1B). The proportion of patients in this subgroup who received post-study therapy was 35.6% in the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm and 66.2% in the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm. Conclusion: For the overall PANORAMA 1 study population, patients in the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm demonstrated an increase in median OS of 4.5 months vs patients in the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm, but this result was not statistically significant (P = .5435). Median OS was also slightly longer for the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm among the more heavily pretreated subgroup of patients who received at least 2 prior regimens, including bortezomib and an IMiD. A higher percentage of patients on the Pbo-BTZ-Dex arm received post-study therapy vs the PAN-BTZ-Dex arm, which may have confounded the OS results. In summary, PAN-BTZ-Dex demonstrates statistically significant increases in PFS vs Pbo-BTZ-Dex in patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM; however, this did not translate to a statistically significant increase in OS. Future trials will plan to focus on further optimization of dose and schedule of panobinostat and bortezomib to improve outcome, as well as novel combinations with other agents, including IMiDs and next-generation proteasome inhibitors. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Beksac: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Dimopoulos:Janssen: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Jedrzejczak:Onconova: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Siritanaratkul:Pfizer: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding. Schlossman:Millennium: Consultancy. Hou:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lonial:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sopala:Novartis Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bengoudifa:Novartis: Employment. Corrado:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Richardson:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Alone for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Among Patients with 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Based on Previous Treatment Exposure: Updated Analysis of Pollux

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 489-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
Heather J. Sutherland ◽  
Marc Lalancette ◽  
Hila Magen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Introduction: Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 IgGκ monoclonal antibody that has been combined successfully with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. The combination of daratumumab with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) has been compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (Rd) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in a randomized phase 3 study (Dimopoulos MA, et al. N Engl J Med 2016; in press). In a pre-specified interim analysis, the DRd combination demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) in addition to deep and durable responses compared with the Rd arm. We performed subgroup analyses to further examine these efficacy data according to prior treatment exposure. Methods: Pts who received ≥1 prior line of therapy were randomized (1:1) to Rd (lenalidomide: 25 mg PO on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle; dexamethasone: 40 mg PO weekly) with or without daratumumab (16 mg/kg IV qw for 8 weeks, q2w for 16 weeks, then q4w until progression). The primary endpoint was PFS. Pts who were refractory to lenalidomide were not eligible. All analyses were performed in pts who received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy. Results: Median follow-up was 13.5 months. Pts who were lenalidomide-naive prior to the start of study treatment (DRd, n=226; Rd, n=219) demonstrated significantly longer PFS with DRd vs Rd (median: not reached [NR] vs 18.4 months; HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.25-0.52; P<0.0001), with estimated 12-month PFS rates of 83.0% vs 59.9%, respectively. ORR was significantly higher with DRd vs Rd (96% vs 79%), with ≥VGPR rates of 76% vs 47% and ≥CR rates of 44% vs 21%, respectively (P<0.0001 for all). In the lenalidomide-exposed subgroup (DRd, n=46; Rd, n=45), median PFS was NR in both treatment groups (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.22-1.12; P=0.0826); estimated 12-month PFS rates were 84.1% vs 63.1%, respectively. ORR was higher with DRd vs Rd but did not reach statistical significance (87% vs 71%; P=0.0729); however, rates of ≥VGPR (78% vs 38%; P=0.0001) and ≥CR (44% vs 12%; P=0.0011) were significantly improved with DRd vs Rd, respectively. For bortezomib-naive pts (DRd, n=44; Rd, n=45), PFS was significantly longer with DRd vs Rd (median: NR vs 15.8 months; HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.86; P=0.0170), with estimated 12-month PFS rates of 85.4% vs 69.2%, respectively. ORR was significantly higher with DRd vs Rd (98% vs 82%; P=0.0158), with trends toward increased rates of ≥VGPR (74% vs 55%; P=0.0544) and ≥CR (42% vs 23%; P=0.0576). In the bortezomib-exposed pts (DRd, n=228; Rd, n=219), median PFS was NR in DRd vs 18.4 months in Rd (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.50 P<0.0001); estimated 12-month PFS rates were 82.8% vs 58.7%, respectively. Significant differences in ORR (93% vs 77%), rate of ≥VGPR (77% vs 43%) and rate of ≥CR (44% vs 19%) were observed with DRd vs Rd, respectively (P<0.0001 for all). Among bortezomib-refractory patients (DRd, n=54; Rd, n=49), the PFS benefit of DRd compared with Rd was maintained (median: NR vs 10.3 mo, respectively; HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.85; P=0.0117; Figure). The estimated 12-month PFS rates were 70.8% vs 44.4%, respectively. Similar to bortezomib-exposed pts, ORR (92% vs 68%; P=0.0024), rate of ≥VGPR (75% vs 36%; P=0.0001), and rate of ≥CR (46% vs 13%; P=0.0003) were all significantly higher with DRd vs Rd for bortezomib-refractory pts. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Among pts who received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy, significantly longer PFS and higher ORR were observed with DRd vs Rd among pts who previously received bortezomib or were refractory to bortezomib or were lenalidomide-naive. Higher rates of deeper responses were observed in pts who previously received lenalidomide or bortezomib. Follow-up is ongoing to assess PFS in pts who received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy and previously received lenalidomide. These results further strengthen the significant benefit of combining daratumumab with Rd for RRMM. Figure Progression-free Survival in Bortezomib-refractory Patients who Received 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Figure. Progression-free Survival in Bortezomib-refractory Patients who Received 1 to 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Disclosures Moreau: Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Kaufman:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Sutherland:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lalancette:Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Iida:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding. Prince:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Cochrane:BMS: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings; Novartis: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings; Celgene: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings; Takeda: Other: Received sponsorship to attend international meetings. Khokhar:Janssen: Employment. Guckert:Johnson & Johnson: Equity Ownership; Janssen: Employment. Qin:Janssen: Employment. Oriol:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Pmd-107: Marizomib, Pomalidomide and Low Dose-Dexamethasone Combination Study in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (NCT02103335): Full Enrollment Results from a Phase-1 Multicenter, Open Label Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3326-3326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
Simon Harrison ◽  
Jacob P. Laubach ◽  
Jeffrey Zonder ◽  
Ashraf Z Badros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Marizomib (MRZ) is a novel, irreversible, pan subunit proteasome inhibitor (PI) with preclinical evidence demonstrating in vitro and in vivo activity in multiple myeloma (MM). This study was designed to evaluate the safety and antimyeloma activity of pomalidomide (POM), MRZ and low dose dexamethasone (Lo-DEX) (PMD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Thirty-eight heavily pretreated patients with RRMM were enrolled [dose-escalation cohort (n=14); recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) cohort (n=24)]. IV MRZ (0.3 to 0.5 mg/m2) was administered on Days (D) 1, 4, 8, 11; POM (3 or 4 mg) on D1 through 21; and Lo-DEX (5 or 10 mg) on D1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, 22, 23 of every 28-D cycle. Patients received a median of 4 (range 1-9) prior lines of therapy; 100% received prior lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BTZ), 34% carfilzomib (CFZ), and 50% thalidomide. 53% of patients were refractory to both LEN and BTZ and 21% were refractory to LEN, BTZ, and CFZ. There were no dose limiting toxicities during the study. The most common study treatment related ≥Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (11/38 pts: 29%), pneumonia (4/38 pts 11%), anemia (4/38 pts; 11%), thrombocytopenia (4/38 pts; 11%), and febrile neutropenia (2/38 pts; 5%), with two grade 4 AEs (neutropenia related to POM and viral infection related to DEX), and one grade 5 AE (cardio-respiratory arrest from a suspected PE related to POM). Overall, MRZ was well tolerated, did not add to the incidence or severity of POM/Lo-DEX AEs and the regimen may have fewer hematological and infectious AEs compared to that observed with POM/Lo-DEX. MRZ pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that it was rapidly cleared with a short T1/2 (6.2-11mins) and a large volume of distribution (41-86L) suggesting extensive tissue distribution. Pharmacodynamic analysis demonstrated rapid and robust inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity in both packed whole blood (PWB) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs), reflecting the irreversible binding nature of MRZ. Evolving inhibition of trypsin-like and caspase-like proteasome activity was also observed in PWB and PBMC with continued dosing. The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) for the 36 response evaluable patients was 53% (19/36) and 64% (23/36), respectively (Table 1). Subpopulation analysis demonstrated an ORR of 50% (5/10) in high risk cytogenetic patients, 56% (10/18) in LEN/BTZ refractory patients, 71% (5/7) in LEN/BTZ/CFZ refractory patients and 80% (8/10) in CFZ refractory patients. These data compare favorably against POM/Lo-Dex with a near doubling of ORR in both the total patient population and the double refractory patients. Substantial activity in high-risk patients that are triple refractory and in patients that are refractory to CFZ in prior last regimen was observed. MRZ activity in RRMM patients exposed and/or refractory to multiple PIs is likely a consequence of its unique pan proteasome subunit inhibitory actions. In conclusion, MRZ in combination with POM and Lo-DEX was well tolerated and demonstrated promising activity in heavily pretreated, high-risk RRMM patients. Table 1 Table 1. Disclosures Harrison: Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria. Zonder:Prothena: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Other: DSMC membership. Khot:Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Anderson:C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Millennuim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoprep: Equity Ownership; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Oncoprep: Equity Ownership; Millennuim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. MacLaren:Triphase Accelerator: Employment, Equity Ownership. Reich:Triphase Accelerator: Consultancy. Trikha:Encycle Therapeutics: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Triphase Accelerator: Employment, Equity Ownership. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Phase II Study of Daratumumab in Combination with Azacitidine and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Previously Treated with Daratumumab: Darazadex

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 27-28
Author(s):  
Swetha Kambhampati ◽  
Sandy W. Wong ◽  
Thomas Martin ◽  
Jeffrey L. Wolf ◽  
Priya Choudhry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Dose Modifications

Background: Daratumumab, a human anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, is approved in many countries for use as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), and in combination with standard-of-care regimens in RRMM. The phase 2 DARAZADEX study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of daratumumab plus azacitidine and dexamethasone in RRMM patients previously treated with daratumumab. Pre-clinical data from our laboratory has demonstrated that azacitidine induces a 1.2 - 2.4 increase in CD38 median fluorescent intensity (MFI) in a dose-dependent manner across four different MM cell lines. (Figure 1A) Using an immortalized transgenic natural killer (NK) cell line to mediate lysis, we observed a significant increase in antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) in the azacitidine-treated MM cells as opposed to control. Importantly, this increase in ADCC correlated with CD38 MFI upregulation. (Figure 1B). Based on this data we hypothesize that azacitidine, by upregulating the expression of CD38, can potentially increase the ADCC and efficacy of daratumumab on multiple myeloma cells and help reverse daratumumab resistance. Methods: In this single-arm, 2-stage, phase II study, approximately 23 RRMM patients in the United States will be treated with combination of daratumumab, azacitidine, and dexamethasone. Eligible patients must have progressed on ≥2 lines of prior therapy, including an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and proteasome inhibitor, and have previously been treated with daratumumab with most recent daratumumab treatment being at least 6 months prior to enrollment to allow for CD38 normalization. Patients who were previously primary refractory to daratumumab will be excluded from the study. Patients will receive azacitidine at the standard 75 mg/m2 dose 5 days consecutively every 4 weeks starting day -7 to day -3 of Cycle 1 and then Day 22-26 of Cycle 1-3, and subsequently Day 1-5 of Cycle 5 and thereafter until disease progression or intolerance, with dose modifications for toxicities. Daratumumab will be administered intravenously at the standard dose of 16 mg/kg, with first dose administered on day 1. Daratumumab will be dosed in standard fashion: weekly for 8 doses (induction phase), every two weeks for 8 doses (consolidation phase), and then every 4 weeks thereafter (maintenance phase). Daratumumab will be switched to the subcutaneous formulation at a later timepoint. There will be no dose modifications for daratumumab. Dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg PO (or IV if PO is not available) will be given weekly for Cycle 1 and 2, after which the pre-infusion medication dose can be reduced to 20 mg and non-pre-infusion dose can be reduced or stopped based on investigator's discretion. Bone marrow biopsies will be done within 14 days prior to Cycle 1 day -7 (first azacitidine dose) and on Cycle 1 day 1 prior to first daratumumab infusion (or after completion of first 5 days of azacitidine and prior to first daratumumab infusion), for correlative studies. (Figure 1C) Simon's minimax two-stage design will be used with a safety lead-in cohort of 6 patients. In the first stage, a total of 13 patients will be enrolled (including the safety cohort), and if there is ≥2 responses in 13 patients the study will enroll an additional 10 patients; if there is ≤ 1 responses in 13 patients the study will be stopped. Primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy, as determined by the overall response rate (ORR) of this combination. Secondary objectives include duration of response per international myeloma working group (IMWG) criteria, safety and toxicity, and the 1-year OS and PFS of this combination. An additional secondary objective is to evaluate the changes in CD38 expression on plasma cells induced by azacitidine in patients with RRMM and identify any correlation of this change with depth and duration of response. The exploratory objective will be to evaluate the tumor microenvironment changes induced by azacitidine via mass cytometry (CyTOF). NCT04407442. Figure 1 Disclosures Wong: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Fortis: Research Funding. Martin:Janssen: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; AMGEN: Research Funding. Wolf:Adaptive: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Shah:GSK, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi, BMS, CareDx, Kite, Karyopharm: Consultancy; BMS, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma, Teneobio, Poseida, Nektar: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Azactidine is being used off-label in multiple myeloma

An Open-Label Phase I Study of the Safety and Efficacy of RAD001 in Combination with Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3856-3856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noopur Raje ◽  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Parameswaran N Hari ◽  
Anuj Mahindra ◽  
Sarah Kaster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Oral Steroid ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3856 Poster Board III-792 Background Lenalidomide (Revlimid®, Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients following ≥1 prior therapy. mTOR inhibitor RAD001 has been studied as a single agent in MM, and although well tolerated, did not have single agent activity. Given the increased toxicity noted with pulsed high dose steroids, we sought to study a non-steroid containing oral regimen for the treatment of relapsed MM predicated upon our previous studies which demonstrated synergistic anti-MM activity of mTOR inhibitors when combined with len. Here, we extended our in vitro observations to a phase I clinical trial combining RAD001 with len in patients with relapsed or refractory MM. The primary objective was to assess toxicity of this combination and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The secondary objective was to determine the activity of this combination. Methods Patients with relapsed and refractory MM were assigned to len and RAD001 to be taken for 21 days of a 28 day cycle. Dose escalation followed a modified Fibonacci design. Patients were allowed to continue therapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients received concomitant anti-thrombotic (aspirin 81 or 325 mg/day) therapy. Response was assessed according to modified EBMT and Uniform Criteria, and toxicities were assessed using NCI CTCAE v3.0. Results Eighteen MM patients have been enrolled to date. One patient in cohort 1 (Len: 10mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days) developed grade 3 neutropenia requiring expansion of the cohort. Cohort 2 (Len: 15mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days) also required expansion because of grade 4 thrombocytopenia noted in 1 patient. Dose limiting toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 2/3 patients in cohort 3 (Len: 20mg and RAD001: 5 mg x 21 days). The MTD for patients with MM was therefore declared at 15 mg of len and 5mg of RAD001 for 21 days with a 7 day rest period. Apart from the hematological toxicities expected with the combination, patients otherwise tolerated the regimen well. Most common (≥10%) grade 1 / 2 events included nausea, fatigue, dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation, neuropathy and muscle cramps, all of which were manageable with supportive care. No thromboembolic events were noted. Grade 3 / 4 adverse events ≥ 5% included thrombocytopenia (11%) and neutropenia (22%). Fifteen patients have finished at least 2 cycles of therapy: 8 of 15 patients have either stable disease (SD: 1), minimal response (MR: 5) or a partial response (PR: 2), including 7 of 9 patients treated at the recommended MTD for an overall response rate (MR or better) of 50% (90% CI: [30.76%]). One patient with SD continued therapy for a total of 10 cycles, without significant toxicities. Conclusions The combination of Len plus RAD001 is a well tolerated regimen with predictable hematological toxicities. Promising responses were noted in this heavily pretreated patient population. This combination provides an oral steroid free combination alternative strategy which warrants future evaluation in phase II studies. Disclosures: Raje: Astrazeneca : Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: RAD001 not labelled for use in myeloma. Richardson:Keryx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hari:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Laubach:Novartis:. Ghobrial:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Adams:Novartis: Employment. Makrides:Celgene: Employment.

Cardiac Safety of One Versus Four Hour Romidepsin (Istodax®) Infusion In the Setting of a Phase I/II Trial of Romidepsin, Dexamethasone and Bortezomib for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 5037-5037
Author(s):  
Sam A Ruell ◽  
Miles Prince ◽  
Hang Quach ◽  
Emma Link ◽  
Joanne Dean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Treatment Time ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Abstract Abstract 5037 Various bortezomib (Bz)-based combinations are being examined in the context of relapsed and/ or refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM). Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors (HDACIs) are a novel group of agents that effect a variety of cellular and intracellular processes by enhancing the acetylation of histone and non-histone targets. Romidepsin (Romi), a cyclic tetrapeptide, is a class 1 HDACi. Initial reports suggested that various HDACi induced QTc prolongation as a class effect, although subsequently it has been shown that careful electrolyte management prevent this from being a clinical problem. 32 patients (pts) have been enrolled in a Phase I/II Trial of Romi, Bz and dexamethasone (Dex) in relapsed or refractory MM. The maximum tolerated dose (Romi 10mg/m2, Bz 1.3mg/m2 and Dex 20mg) was determined in the first 6 pts with Romi given on day 1, 8 & 15, Bz on D1, 4, 8 and 11 and Dex D1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 of a 28 day cycle (n=25). In an ongoing expanded Phase IIb cohort Romi is only given on day 1 & 8 of a 21 day cycle (n=7/15). Romidepsin was initially given as the standard 4 hour infusion. However animal and clinical safety data support the use of 1hr Romi infusions. In the expansion cohort, the duration of Romi infusions was reduced to 1 hour from cycle 2. To monitor safety (specifically QT interval), ECGs were mandatory pre and post the 4 hour infusions in cycle one and the 1 hour infusions in cycle 2 and reviewed prior to the continuation of the 1 hour infusion from cycle 3. Prolongation of QTc was defined as an increase of 33%, or 60 msec, or QTc 3500 msec. The maintenance of serum potassium > 4.0 mmol/L and magnesium >0.85 mmol/L prior to Romi infusion was mandated. Any patients in the initial cohort remaining on study and still receiving Romi were eligible to move to 1 hour Romi infusions with ECG monitoring during the first cycle. 32 patients have received 598 Romi infusions. 525 infusions have been given over 4 hours and 73 over 1 hour. 19 pts only received 4 hour infusions and 13 pts received at least one 1 hour infusion of Romi. The phase I/II cohort (n=25, median lines of therapy 2 (range1-3)) received 4 hour infusions, the overall response (CR+PR+MR) by modified EBMT criteria was 76% in 21 assessable patients. 2pts had CR (10%), 13 PR (62%), 1 MR (4%), 4 pts had SD, and 1PD. The Phase IIb cohort (n=7, median lines of therapy 2 (range 1–4)) received 1 hour infusions and 6 pts are currently assessable for response with 3 PR and 3 MR. In the first 25 pts receiving the 4 hour infusions, 2 patients experienced arrhythmias during their first cycle, grade 2 atrial flutter possibly related to drug and sinus tachycardia definitely not related. 1pt developed severe ischaemic heart disease and 1pt has died, likely from a PE. Since the introduction of 1hr Romi infusions, only one patient has experienced a Grade 1 cardiac event of asymptomatic lateral T wave flattening and mild ST depression on ECG. This occurred in cycle one, with 4 hour infusions. Full cardiac assessment reveled no clinically significant abnormality. This patient went on to receive the 1 hour infusions without incident. The implementation of the 1 hour infusions has successfully reduced the overall treatment time with Romi/ Bz/ Dex without increase in toxicity. Although numbers are small the response rates appear similar to those using the 4 hour infusions. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Romidepsin and Velcade in combination for the treatment of relapsed/refractory myeloma. Prince:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Harrison:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document