Human-Cl Rhfviii Effectively and Safely Prevents Bleeding Episodes in Previously Treated Adult Patients with Severe Haemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1132-1132
Author(s):  
Sigurd Knaub ◽  
Toshko Lissitchkov ◽  
Kingsley Hampton ◽  
Mario Von Depka ◽  
Savita Rangarajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Previously Treated

Abstract Abstract 1132 The main purpose of this prospective, multi-center, open-label phase 3 study was to assess the efficacy of prophylactic treatment with Human-cl rhFVIII, the first human cell-line derived recombinant FVIII, in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe haemophilia A. Patients were to receive 30–40 international units (IU) FVIII of Human-cl rhFVIII per kg every other day for 6 months. Efficacy of preventing and treating bleeds were judged using objective criteria taking the monthly bleeding rate and the number of infusions needed to manage a break-through bleed into account. In-vivo recovery (IVR) was determined at the beginning of the study and after 3 and 6 months. FVIII:C was measured by validated chromogenic (CHR) and one-stage (OS) assays in a central laboratory, which also assigned drug potencies. Inhibitor activity was determined using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay before the first administration and at defined intervals thereafter. Thirty-two patients between 18 and 75 years of age were enrolled from 11 centres in Europe and treated prophylactically for 6.0±0.9 months (mean ± SD) with a mean prophylactic dose of 32.8 IU/kg. Sixteen patients never bled, 11 patients bled once and 5 more than once. The mean total and spontaneous monthly bleeding rate was 0.188±0.307 and 0.095±0.211, respectively. Efficacy of the prophylactic treatment was “excellent” in all patients for spontaneous BEs and “excellent” or “good” in all patients but one for all types of bleeds. All treatments of bleeds were rated as “excellent” (71.4%) or “good” (28.6%). The IVR at baseline was 2.6±0.5 % per IU/kg for the CHR and 2.2±0.5 % per IU/kg for the OS assay and remained stable during the study. A total of 2921 infusions were given in the study. Human-cl rhFVIII was well tolerated and no patient experienced a related serious adverse event. No FVIII inhibitors were detected. Conclusion: The data indicate that Human-cl rh FVIII is safe and efficacious in preventing and treating bleeds in PTPs with severe haemophlia A. Disclosures: Knaub: Octapharma AG: Employment. Lissitchkov:Octapharma AG: PI Other. Tuddenham:College London: Consultancy, Employment, Gene therapy for hemophilia A, Gene therapy for hemophilia A Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Collins:Octapharma AG: Consultancy. Oldenburg:d and e: Baxter, Bayer, Biotest, CSL-Behring, Grifols, Inspiration, NovoNordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer e: Biogen IDec, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bichler:Octapharma AG: Employment.

Safety and efficacy of a glycoPEGylated rFVIII (turoctocog alpha pegol, N8-GP) in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (09) ◽  
pp. 1705-1713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandrine Meunier ◽  
Jayanthi Alamelu ◽  
Silke Ehrenforth ◽  
Hideji Hanabusa ◽  
Faraizah Abdul Karim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Half Life ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Older Children ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Paediatric Patients ◽  
Effective Prophylaxis ◽  
History Of ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated

SummaryTuroctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP, Novo Nordisk, Bagsværd, Denmark), an extended half-life glycoPEGylated recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII), is being developed for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds in haemophilia A patients. pathfinder™5 is a multinational, open-label, single-arm trial to assess safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of N8-GP in paediatric (<12 years), previously treated patients. Boys with severe haemophilia A (<1 % FVIII), no history of inhibitors and previously treated with FVIII products (>50 exposure days [ED] for patients aged 0–5 years [younger cohort]; >150 ED for patients aged 6–11 years [older cohort]) were included. For prophylaxis, N8-GP was dosed at 50–75 IU/kg twice weekly; bleeds were treated with 20–75 IU/kg. Half-life was estimated for the patients’ previous FVIII product and for N8-GP. Sixty-eight patients received N8-GP; none developed inhibitors and no other concerns were identified. Median annualised bleeding rate was 1.95 (1.94 and 1.97 in the younger and older cohorts, respectively). Twenty-nine patients (42.6 %; 15 younger and 14 older children, respectively) did not report any bleeding while on N8-GP prophylaxis; 39 patients (57.4 %; 19 younger and 20 older children, respectively) reported 70 bleeds (all mild/moderate). N8-GP treatment was successful for 78.6 % of bleeds in all patients, 80.0 % in younger and 77.5 % in older patients. Most bleeds (80.0 %) were treated with ≤2 injections. Half-life ratio between N8-GP and the patients’ previous FVIII product was 1.85. N8-GP was well tolerated and provided effective prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds in paediatric patients with severe haemophilia A.Trial registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01731600).Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

A Pharmacokinetic Study of the Plasma-Derived Factor IX AlphaNine® and Its Comparison with the Recombinant Factor IX BeneFIX®, in Previously Treated Patients with Severe Hereditary Hemophilia B.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3955-3955
Author(s):  
Vicente R. Cortina ◽  
T. Lissichkov ◽  
K. Zavilska ◽  
M. Matysiak ◽  
L. Gercheva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Half Life ◽  
Factor Ix ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Recombinant Factor Ix ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
In Vivo Recovery

Abstract Objectives The objective of the present study was two fold: first, to determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the plasma-derived FIX concentrate AlphaNine® in patients with congenital severe haemophilia B (FIX:C 2%). To do this, two PK studies were carried out one six months after the first. The second objective was a comparison of the Alphanine® PK profile with the recombinant Factor IX, BeneFIX®. Patients and methods The first study was a prospective, five-center, open-label, comparative, PK study carried out in 25 severe hemophilia B patients who received 2 single doses of 65–75 IU/kg of AlphaNine® within 6 months (t=0 and t=6). The following parameters were assessed: in vivo recovery, half-life, AUC, mean residence time and clearance. As an extension of the study, a single dose of 65–75 IU/kg of BeneFIX® was administered in 9 out of 25 patients, after a wash-out period of 7–15 days. Results Table 1 summarizes the results obtained when comparing AlphaNine® within a period of time of 6 months (PK1 vs PK2) in 25 patients. Table 2 shows the results obtained when comparing the in vivo recovery of AlphaNine ® vs BeneFIX ® in the 9 patients studied. Conclusions These results confirm that AlphaNine® PK has similar profile as other plasma derived FIX products presently available to treat Hemophilia B patients. In addition, our results show that the recombinant FIX studied, BeneFIX® has a reduced in vivo recovery when is compared to AlphaNine®. Table 1 Parameter AlphaNine® (PK1) t=0 m AlphaNine® (PK2) t=6 m Results are expressed as Mean (SD) In vivo recovery (IU/dl:IU/kg) 1.0 (0.2) 1.2 (0.4) Half-life (h) 34.5 (6.2) 33.7 (5.4) Clearance (ml/min) 0.07 (0.01) 0.07 (0.01) AUC0-inf (IUxh/dl) 1602 (312) 1644 (360) MRT0-inf (h) 35.8 (5.4) 34.6 (5.2) Table 2 Parameter AlphaNine® (PK2) BeneFIX® Results are expressed as Mean (SD); * p<0.05 for the comparison of the in vivo recovery for the BeneFIX® group with the AlphaNine® PK2 In vivo recovery (IU/dl:IU/kg) 1.3 (0.5) 0.8 (0.2)*

Efficacy, Immunogenicity, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety Of Human-cl rhFVIII – a GCP Study In Children With Severe Haemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3594-3594
Author(s):  
Raina Liesner ◽  
Martina Jansen ◽  
Anna Klukowska ◽  
Vladimir Vdovin ◽  
Tomasz Szczepanski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Age Groups ◽  
Human Cell Line ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Central Laboratory ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Bleeding Episodes ◽  
The One

Abstract Introduction Human-cl rhFVIIIis the first recombinant factor VIII concentrate expressed in a human cell line (Human Embryonic Kidney 293F cells). Studies in adolescent and adult pre-treated patients with severe haemophilia A showed a favorable PK profile with a median half-life of 17.1 hours (one stage assay) and indicated safety and efficacy in preventing and treating bleeding episodes (BE). Aims The objectives of this international GCP study were to evaluate the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of Human-cl rhFVIIIin previously treated children between 2 and 12 years of age. Methods All patients started with an in-vivo recovery (IVR) investigation and in a subset of patients, the PK of Human-cl rhFVIII was assessed in comparison to the patient’s previously used FVIII product. After an injection of 50 IU/kg, blood samples were collected up to 48 hours for PK analysis and up to 2 hours for IVR. IVR was repeated in all patients after 3 and 6 months. FVIII plasma levels were measured by chromogenic and one-stage assay in a central laboratory. Patients were treated prophylactically with Human-cl rhFVIII every other day or 3x weekly, injecting 30-40 IU Human-cl rhFVIIIper kg for at least 6 months and > 50 exposure days. Inhibitors were measured before, during and at the end of the study by modified Nijmegen Bethesda assay in a central laboratory. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. Results 59 patients (29: 2-5 years; 30: 6-12 years) were enrolled from 15 specialized sites in Europe. 13 children of each age group participated in the comparative PK investigation. Mean PK parameters of Human-cl rhFVIII were similar in both age groups for both the chromogenic and the one-stage assay: AUCnorm 0.23 vs. 0.24 h*IU/mL/[IU/kg]); IVR 1.88 vs. 1.61% per IU/kg; T1/2 9.7 vs. 12.5 h. IVR remained stable throughout the study. A total of 108 BEs in 32/59 patients were treated with Human-cl rhFVIII. The majority of treated BEs were traumatic (60.2%) and minor (56.5%). The mean ± SD monthly bleeding rate of all types of BEs/patient was 0.34±0.43 (spontaneous BEs: 0.12±0.27; traumatic BEs: 0.19±0.29). No inhibitor development was reported; no patient discontinued the study because of an AE. Conclusion The data indicate that Human-cl rhFVIII is efficacious and safe in preventing and treating BEs in previously treated children. The PK of Human-cl rhFVIII was comparable in both studied age groups. Disclosures: Liesner: Octapharma AG: Consultancy, Investigator Other. Jansen:Octapharma AG: Employment. Klukowska:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Vdovin:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Szczepanski:Octapharma AG: Investigator Other. Knaub:Octapharma AG: Employment.

scholarly journals ASPIRE Final Results Confirm Established Safety and Sustained Efficacy for Up to 4 Years of Treatment With rFVIIIFc in Previously Treated Subjects With Severe Hemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1192-1192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrice Nolan ◽  
Johnny Mahlangu ◽  
Guy Young ◽  
Barbara A Konkle ◽  
K. John Pasi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Coagulation Factor ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previously Treated

Abstract Introduction: Prophylactic replacement of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is the standard of care in hemophilia A, given its natural mechanism of action, strict homeostatic regulation, and consistent safety profile. Recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) is an extended half-life therapy that demonstrated safety and efficacy in previously treated pediatric, adolescent, and adult subjects with severe hemophilia A in the Phase 3 A-LONG and Kids A-LONG trials (NCT01181128 and NCT01458106, respectively) (Young et al, J Thromb Haemostas, 2015; Mahlangu et al, Blood, 2014). Herein, the final results are reported from ASPIRE (NCT01454739), the long-term extension trial of those 2 studies. Methods: This was an open-label, multicenter, long-term trial of previously treated subjects of all ages with severe hemophilia A. Subjects received 1 of the 4 following regimens: individualized prophylaxis (IP; rFVIIIFc 25‒60 IU/kg every 3-5 days, or twice weekly), weekly prophylaxis (WP; rFVIIIFc 65 IU/kg every 7 days), modified prophylaxis (MP; personalized dosing), or episodic treatment (ET; on-demand dosing based on bleeding episodes). Subjects <12 years of age were eligible for only IP or MP. Investigators could switch a subject's treatment group at any time; therefore, each subject may appear in >1 treatment group. The primary endpoint was development of inhibitors. Secondary endpoints included annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), joint ABRs, spontaneous joint ABRs, exposure days (ED), and factor consumption. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Analyses were performed separately based on parent study. Results: A total of 211 subjects (150 were from A-LONG and 61 were from Kids A-LONG) enrolled in ASPIRE, and 186 subjects (132 from A-LONG and 54 from Kids A-LONG) completed the study. Subjects from Kids A-LONG had a median (range) age of 6.0 (2-12) years. Of the subjects from the A-LONG study enrolled to ASPIRE, the median (range) age was 31.0 (13-66) years. Most subjects received IP regardless of parent study (Kids A-LONG: IP [n=59], MP [n=3]; A-LONG: IP [n=110], WP [n=27], MP [n=21], ET [n=13]). No inhibitors were observed throughout the study, and the overall safety profile of rFVIIIFc was consistent with the parent studies and prior interim analyses. ABRs remained low throughout the entirety of ASPIRE in subjects prescribed IP (Table 1). For subjects from the Kids A-LONG study, the median (range) number of ED during ASPIRE was 332.0 (18.0-467.0) days. Total median (range) treatment duration was 166.6 (14.4-203.0) weeks. The median (range) number of ED for A-LONG subjects was 267.5 (8.0-660.0) days. Total median treatment duration was 201.4 (5.1-274.6) weeks. Overall, the median (range) duration of treatment with rFVIIIFc was 4.1 (0.4, 5.9) years. From the end of the parent study to the end of ASPIRE, the rFVIIIFc dosing interval increased for 6.6% and 21.1% of subjects from Kids A-LONG and A-LONG, respectively (Table 2). There was no change in median weekly factor consumption from the end of either parent study to the end of ASPIRE. For subjects from Kids A-LONG, the median (IQR) was 0.0 (0.0‒3.2), while the median (IQR) for those from A-LONG was 0.0 (0.0‒0.0). Conclusions: Throughout up to 4 years of treatment with rFVIIIFc in the ASPIRE extension study, no inhibitors were reported, and low ABRs and extended dosing intervals were sustained. These data are consistent with the well-characterized safety profile and durable efficacy of rFVIIIFc prophylaxis in previously treated subjects of all ages with hemophilia A. Disclosures Nolan: Bayer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding. Mahlangu:Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Consultancy; Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Biomarin: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; LFB: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding. Young:Bayer: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kedrion: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria. Konkle:Sangamo: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding. Pasi:Shire: Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Biomarin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Honoraria; Bioverativ: Honoraria, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Speakers Bureau; Catalyst Bio: Honoraria; Apcintex: Honoraria. Oldenburg:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biogen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nogami:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: Anti-FIXa/X bispecific antibodies , Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Tripkovic:Sobi: Employment. Rudin:Bioverativ: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Impact of Prophylaxis Usage on Bleeding Rates Among Persons with Hemophilia A: Evidence from Longitudinal Analyses in the USA

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 494-494
Author(s):  
Michael B. Nichol ◽  
Randall Curtis ◽  
Yuchen Ding ◽  
Elmar R. Aliyev ◽  
Marion A. Koerper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Bleeding Rate

Abstract BACKGROUND There are limited longitudinal studies following up persons with hemophilia (PWH) in adherence to clotting factor treatment and health outcomes. The Hemophilia Utilization Group Studies part Va (HUGS Va) was a two-year observational study of persons with hemophilia A conducted from 2005-2007. Participants from HUGS Va were enrolled to the long-term follow-up study (HUGS LTS) in 2014. OBJECTIVES To compare participants' characteristics between baseline of HUGS Va and follow-up in LTS; and investigate the impacts of changes of participants' characteristics on annualized bleeding rates. METHODS We collected data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Self-reported bleedings were obtained from periodic surveys for 2-years in HUGS Va, and a survey that asked bleedings in the past 6-month in HUGS LTS. Clotting factor dispensing records were collected prospectively for two years in HUGS Va, and retrospectively for six months prior to HUGS LTS enrollment. Annualized bleeding rates and factor dispensing (unit/kg body weight) were calculated. Adherence to factor treatment was determined by the ratio of dispensed clotting factor to clinical recommended factor usage. We classified age at baseline of HUGS Va into three groups: children (aged 2-11 years), adolescents (aged 12-20 years), and adults (aged ≥21 years). The characteristics of participants were compared among the three age groups using Chi-square tests for categorical variables and ANOVA for continuous variables for each study. Annualized factor dispensed and bleeding rates were compared between HUGS Va and HUGS LTS using paired T-tests. RESULTS A total of 74 persons participated in both HUGS Va and LTS with completed data to calculate annualized factor dispensed and bleeding rates were included to the analyses. The mean age was 17.8±11.4 years in HUGS Va, and 26.2±11.5 years in LTS, respectively. The sample had 43% of children, 22% adolescents, and 35% adults at baseline. All adolescents at baseline transitioned to young adults in LTS. Approximately 80% of participants were severe hemophilia. Adults (73%) were less likely to have an entire year of health insurance as compared to children (100%) or adolescents (93.8%, P<0.01) in HUGS Va. Health insurance status was not significantly different among age groups in LTS. In HUGS Va, children had the highest rate of prophylactic treatment (74%), adherence to factor treatment (62%), highest mean annualized factor dispensed (4724±4090 u/kg), lowest rate of self-reported moderate or severe joint pain (31%), and lowest mean annualized bleeding rate (4.2±4.7); while adults had the lowest rate of prophylactic treatment (31%), adherence (28%), lowest mean annualized factor dispensed (2084±1870 u/kg), highest rate of self-reported moderate or severe joint pain (73%), and highest mean annualized bleeding rate (11.9±9.3), all P<0.05 among age group comparisons for these variables. There were 18 (26%) people (22% children, 17% adolescents, and 61% adults) switching from episodic treatment to prophylactic treatment from HUGS Va to LTS; others remained on the same treatment regimens. Adolescents and adults increased in prophylactic treatment (63% to 80% for adolescents, 31% to 69% for adults, respectively), adherence (36% to 75%, 28% to 61%), and mean annualized factor dispensed (3206±2581 to 4931±2945 u/kg, 2084±1870 to 4612±2577 u/kg) from HUGS Va to LTS. Mean annualized bleeding rates were not statistically significant different between HUGS Va (7.3±8.4) and LTS (10.6±22.0, P>0.05). The bleeding rates were not significantly different among age groups in LTS (P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS Although current literature indicated that PWH in transition from childhood to adulthood maybe at high risk of adverse health outcomes due to poor management of their condition with diminishing influence from parents, adolescents showed a significant increase in prophylactic treatment, adherence to factor treatment, and annualized factor dispensed, which may be associated with unchanged annualized bleed rates after they transitioned to adulthood in this study. Adults had a larger increase in dispensed factors than adolescents. Prophylaxis and adherence to clotting factor treatment were associated with a lower bleeding rate. Our current analyses reinforce the importance of prophylaxis and adherence to factor treatment for decreasing bleedings in persons with hemophilia A. Disclosures Nichol: Bayer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Research Funding; Shire/Baxter: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Curtis:Gilead: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire/Baxter: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Research Funding; National Hemophilia Foundation: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ding:Novo Nordisk: Employment; Bioverativ: Research Funding. Aliyev:Genentech: Research Funding. Lou:Bioverativ: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Shire/Baxter: Research Funding. Ullman:Genentech: Research Funding. Tran:Bioverativ: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding. Baker:Genentech: Research Funding. Riske:Genentech: Research Funding. Wu:Pfizer: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Shire/Baxter: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding.

Clinical evaluation of glycoPEGylated recombinant FVIII: Efficacy and safety in severe haemophilia A

2017 ◽  
Vol 117 (02) ◽  
pp. 252-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Giangrande ◽  
Tatiana Andreeva ◽  
Pratima Chowdary ◽  
Silke Ehrenforth ◽  
Hideji Hanabusa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Activity Levels ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Favourable Safety Profile ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Recombinant Fviii

SummaryTuroctocog alfa pegol (N8-GP) is a novel glycoPEGylated extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) product developed for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds in patients with haemophilia A, to enable higher activity levels with less frequent injections compared with standard FVIII products. This phase III (NCT01480180), multinational, open-label, non-randomised trial evaluated the safety and clinical efficacy of N8-GP when administered for treatment of bleeds and for prophylaxis, in previously treated patients aged ≥12 years with severe haemophilia A. Patients were allocated to receive N8-GP for prophylaxis or on-demand treatment for up to 1.8 years. Patients on prophylaxis were administered one dose of 50 IU/kg of N8-GP every fourth day. Bleeds were treated with doses of 20–75 IU/kg. Total exposure to N8-GP in the trial was 14,114 exposure days (159 patient-years). For the prophylaxis arm (n=175), the median annualised bleeding rate (ABR) was 1.33 (interquartile range, 0.00–4.61), the mean ABR was 3.70 (95 % confidence interval 2.94–4.66) and 70 (40 %) patients had no bleeds during the trial. Across treatment arms, 83.6 % of bleeds resolved with one injection and 95.5 % with up to two injections. N8-GP had a favourable safety profile and was well tolerated. The frequency and types of adverse events reported were as expected in this population. One patient developed inhibitory antibodies against FVIII (≥0.6 Bethesda units [BU]) after 93 N8-GP exposure days. No clinically significant safety concerns were identified and N8-GP was effective for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds in previously treated patients.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety Results from a Phase 3b, Open-Label, Multicenter, Continuation Study of Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol for Prophylaxis in Previously Treated Patients with Severe Hemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2483-2483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric S. Mullins ◽  
Barbara A Konkle ◽  
Catherine E. McGuinn ◽  
Werner Engl ◽  
Srilatha D. Tangada
Keyword(s):  
Half Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Recombinant Fviii

Abstract Background: Patients with severe hemophilia A experience substantial morbidity and mortality due to frequent spontaneous and traumatic bleeding episodes, especially in joints. Prophylaxis with standard half-life factor VIII (FVIII) is the standard of care to prevent bleeds. Extended half-life products benefit patients by reducing the number of infusions without impacting the treatment efficacy. Methods: This phase 3b, prospective, open-label, multicenter, continuation study (NCT# 01945593) investigated the safety and efficacy of a PEGylated recombinant FVIII with an extended half-life, rurioctocog alfa pegol (SHP660, BAX 855, ADYNOVATE®, Shire, Lexington, MA, USA), for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding in patients with severe hemophilia A (FVIII <1%). Eligible children and adults were ≤75 years of age and had either completed a previous rurioctocog alfa pegol study (NCT# 01599819, 01736475, 02210091, 02615691, 01913405, or 02585960) and were willing to immediately transition to the continuation study, or were naïve to rurioctocog alfa pegol but had received treatment with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII for ≥150 (in patients ≥6 years of age) or ≥50 (in patients <6 years of age) exposure days. Patients received prophylactic rurioctocog alfa pegol at least twice weekly, either at a fixed dose (FD; 45 ± 5 IU/kg in patients ≥12 years of age; 50 ± 10 IU/kg in those <12 years of age; dose adjustment ≤80 ± 5 IU/kg allowed) or with pharmacokinetically (PK)-tailored dosing (≤80 ± 5 IU/kg) to maintain FVIII trough levels ≥3%. The co-primary endpoints assessed were the incidence of FVIII inhibitory antibody development (as measured by ≥0.6 BU in the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay) and the spontaneous annualized bleed rate (ABR). Secondary endpoints included overall hemostatic efficacy ratings and occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Results: The study began in October 2013 and completed in March 2018. Overall, 216 patients receiving prophylaxis were eligible and included in the safety/full analysis dataset (≥1 dose received). Of these, 215 were male, the mean (SD) age at enrollment was 22.8 (15.7) years, the mean (SD) number of documented previous rurioctocog alfa pegol exposure days was 57.0 (39.6), the total ABR over 3-6 months prior to enrollment in the continuation study (including patients naïve to rurioctocog alfa pegol or receiving on-demand or prophylactic treatment with rurioctocog alfa pegol) was mean (SD) 4.7 (12.6), median (range) 0.0 (0-69). Most patients (206; 95.4%) had participated in a previous rurioctocog alfa pegol study. Overall, 215 patients received ≥1 dose in the FD regimen and 25 received ≥1 dose in the PK regimen. These patients received a mean (SD) of 1.72 (0.29) and 2.11 (0.61) prophylactic infusions per week, respectively, with a mean (SD) dose per infusion of 51.15 (8.11) IU/kg and 52.14 (17.03) IU/kg, respectively. None of the patients developed a confirmed FVIII inhibitor in this study and only 1 treatment-related allergic or hypersensitivity reaction (a nonserious mild AE) was reported. Nonserious AEs assessed by the investigators to be related to treatment occurred in 11/216 (5.1%) patients. Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 33 (15.3%) patients; there were no SAEs assessed by the investigators to be related to treatment. Descriptive statistics on spontaneous, joint, and total ABR by prophylactic regimen are shown in the Table. The overall total ABR in all patients was mean (SD) 2.5 (3.1), median (range) 1.6 (0.0-19.5). Overall hemostatic efficacy was rated as good or excellent in 88.5% of all bleeds and 89.4% of all bleeds were treated with 1 or 2 infusions. Conclusions: These results show that in previously treated patients with severe hemophilia A, rurioctocog alfa pegol prophylaxis in FD- and PK-tailored regimens was well tolerated and effective. None of the patients developed FVIII inhibitory antibodies, and a decrease in mean total ABR was reported in these patients compared with baseline. Disclosures Mullins: Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Konkle:Genentech: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Sangamo: Research Funding. McGuinn:CSL Behring: Consultancy; BioMarin: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Shire: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Engl:Shire: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tangada:Shire: Employment, Equity Ownership.

A Multicenter Study of Recombinant Factor VIII (RecombinateTM) in Previously Treated Patients with Hemophilia A

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (04) ◽  
pp. 660-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
G C White ◽  
S Courter ◽  
G L Bray ◽  
M Lee ◽  
E D Gomperts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Recombinant Dna ◽  
Home Treatment ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Parameters ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Treat Ment ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Bleeding Episodes

SummaryA prospective, open-label multicenter investigation has been conducted to compare pharmacokinetic parameters of recombinant DNA-derived FVIII (rFVIII) and plasma-derived FVIII concentrate (pdFVIII) and to assess safety and efficacy of long-term home-treat- ment with rFVIII for subjects with hemophilia A. Following comparative in vivo pharmacokinetic studies, 69 patients with severe (n = 67) or moderate (n = 2) hemophilia A commenced a program of home treatment using rFVIII exclusively for prophylaxis and treatment of all bleeding episodes for a period of 1.0 to 5.7 years (median 3.7 years). The mean in vivo half-lives of rFVIII and pdFVIII were both 14.7 h. In vivo incremental recoveries at baseline were 2.40%/IU/kg and 2.47%/IU/kg, respectively (p = 0.59). The response to home treatment with rFVIII was categorized as good or excellent in 3,195 (91.2%) of 3,481 evaluated bleeding episodes. Thirteen patients received rFVIII for prophylaxis for twenty-four surgical procedures. In all cases, hemostasis was excellent. Adverse reactions were observed in only 13 of 13,591 (0.096%) infusions of rFVIII; none was serious. No patient developed an inhibitor to r FVIII.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document