scholarly journals Impact of Prophylaxis Usage on Bleeding Rates Among Persons with Hemophilia A: Evidence from Longitudinal Analyses in the USA

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 494-494
Author(s):  
Michael B. Nichol ◽  
Randall Curtis ◽  
Yuchen Ding ◽  
Elmar R. Aliyev ◽  
Marion A. Koerper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Bleeding Rate

Abstract BACKGROUND There are limited longitudinal studies following up persons with hemophilia (PWH) in adherence to clotting factor treatment and health outcomes. The Hemophilia Utilization Group Studies part Va (HUGS Va) was a two-year observational study of persons with hemophilia A conducted from 2005-2007. Participants from HUGS Va were enrolled to the long-term follow-up study (HUGS LTS) in 2014. OBJECTIVES To compare participants' characteristics between baseline of HUGS Va and follow-up in LTS; and investigate the impacts of changes of participants' characteristics on annualized bleeding rates. METHODS We collected data on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Self-reported bleedings were obtained from periodic surveys for 2-years in HUGS Va, and a survey that asked bleedings in the past 6-month in HUGS LTS. Clotting factor dispensing records were collected prospectively for two years in HUGS Va, and retrospectively for six months prior to HUGS LTS enrollment. Annualized bleeding rates and factor dispensing (unit/kg body weight) were calculated. Adherence to factor treatment was determined by the ratio of dispensed clotting factor to clinical recommended factor usage. We classified age at baseline of HUGS Va into three groups: children (aged 2-11 years), adolescents (aged 12-20 years), and adults (aged ≥21 years). The characteristics of participants were compared among the three age groups using Chi-square tests for categorical variables and ANOVA for continuous variables for each study. Annualized factor dispensed and bleeding rates were compared between HUGS Va and HUGS LTS using paired T-tests. RESULTS A total of 74 persons participated in both HUGS Va and LTS with completed data to calculate annualized factor dispensed and bleeding rates were included to the analyses. The mean age was 17.8±11.4 years in HUGS Va, and 26.2±11.5 years in LTS, respectively. The sample had 43% of children, 22% adolescents, and 35% adults at baseline. All adolescents at baseline transitioned to young adults in LTS. Approximately 80% of participants were severe hemophilia. Adults (73%) were less likely to have an entire year of health insurance as compared to children (100%) or adolescents (93.8%, P<0.01) in HUGS Va. Health insurance status was not significantly different among age groups in LTS. In HUGS Va, children had the highest rate of prophylactic treatment (74%), adherence to factor treatment (62%), highest mean annualized factor dispensed (4724±4090 u/kg), lowest rate of self-reported moderate or severe joint pain (31%), and lowest mean annualized bleeding rate (4.2±4.7); while adults had the lowest rate of prophylactic treatment (31%), adherence (28%), lowest mean annualized factor dispensed (2084±1870 u/kg), highest rate of self-reported moderate or severe joint pain (73%), and highest mean annualized bleeding rate (11.9±9.3), all P<0.05 among age group comparisons for these variables. There were 18 (26%) people (22% children, 17% adolescents, and 61% adults) switching from episodic treatment to prophylactic treatment from HUGS Va to LTS; others remained on the same treatment regimens. Adolescents and adults increased in prophylactic treatment (63% to 80% for adolescents, 31% to 69% for adults, respectively), adherence (36% to 75%, 28% to 61%), and mean annualized factor dispensed (3206±2581 to 4931±2945 u/kg, 2084±1870 to 4612±2577 u/kg) from HUGS Va to LTS. Mean annualized bleeding rates were not statistically significant different between HUGS Va (7.3±8.4) and LTS (10.6±22.0, P>0.05). The bleeding rates were not significantly different among age groups in LTS (P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS Although current literature indicated that PWH in transition from childhood to adulthood maybe at high risk of adverse health outcomes due to poor management of their condition with diminishing influence from parents, adolescents showed a significant increase in prophylactic treatment, adherence to factor treatment, and annualized factor dispensed, which may be associated with unchanged annualized bleed rates after they transitioned to adulthood in this study. Adults had a larger increase in dispensed factors than adolescents. Prophylaxis and adherence to clotting factor treatment were associated with a lower bleeding rate. Our current analyses reinforce the importance of prophylaxis and adherence to factor treatment for decreasing bleedings in persons with hemophilia A. Disclosures Nichol: Bayer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Research Funding; Shire/Baxter: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Curtis:Gilead: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire/Baxter: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Research Funding; National Hemophilia Foundation: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ding:Novo Nordisk: Employment; Bioverativ: Research Funding. Aliyev:Genentech: Research Funding. Lou:Bioverativ: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Shire/Baxter: Research Funding. Ullman:Genentech: Research Funding. Tran:Bioverativ: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding. Baker:Genentech: Research Funding. Riske:Genentech: Research Funding. Wu:Pfizer: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Shire/Baxter: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Effects of replacement therapies with clotting factors in patients with hemophilia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0262273
Author(s):  
Carolina J. Delgado-Flores ◽  
David García-Gomero ◽  
Stefany Salvador-Salvador ◽  
José Montes-Alvis ◽  
Celina Herrera-Cunti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Episodic Treatment ◽  
Grade Methodology ◽  
Inform Decision Making ◽  
Intermediate Dose

Background Different prophylactic and episodic clotting factor treatments are used in the management of hemophilia. A summarize of the evidence is needed inform decision-making. Objective To compare the effects of factor replacement therapies in patients with hemophilia. Methods We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Central Cochrane Library, and Scopus. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to December 2020, which compared different factor replacement therapies in patients with hemophilia. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed whenever possible. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021225857). Results Nine RCTs were included in this review, of which six compared episodic with prophylactic treatment, all of them performed in patients with hemophilia A. Pooled results showed that, compared to the episodic treatment group, the annualized bleeding rate was lower in the low-dose prophylactic group (ratio of means [RM]: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.43), intermediate-dose prophylactic group (RM: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.36), and high-dose prophylactic group (RM: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.13). With significant difference between these subgroups (p = 0.003, I2 = 82.9%). In addition, compared to the episodic treatment group, the annualized joint bleeding rate was lower in the low-dose prophylactic group (RM: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.43), intermediate-dose prophylactic group (RM of 0.14, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.27), and high-dose prophylactic group (RM of 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.16). Without significant subgroup differences. The certainty of the evidence was very low for all outcomes according to GRADE methodology. The other studies compared different types of clotting factor concentrates (CFCs), assessed pharmacokinetic prophylaxis, or compared different frequencies of medication administration. Conclusions Our results suggest that prophylactic treatment (at either low, intermediate, or high doses) is superior to episodic treatment for bleeding prevention. In patients with hemophilia A, the bleeding rate seems to have a dose-response effect. However, no study compared different doses of prophylactic treatment, and all results had a very low certainty of the evidence. Thus, future studies are needed to confirm these results and inform decision making.

Human-Cl Rhfviii Effectively and Safely Prevents Bleeding Episodes in Previously Treated Adult Patients with Severe Haemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1132-1132
Author(s):  
Sigurd Knaub ◽  
Toshko Lissitchkov ◽  
Kingsley Hampton ◽  
Mario Von Depka ◽  
Savita Rangarajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Haemophilia A ◽  
Severe Haemophilia ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Previously Treated

Abstract Abstract 1132 The main purpose of this prospective, multi-center, open-label phase 3 study was to assess the efficacy of prophylactic treatment with Human-cl rhFVIII, the first human cell-line derived recombinant FVIII, in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe haemophilia A. Patients were to receive 30–40 international units (IU) FVIII of Human-cl rhFVIII per kg every other day for 6 months. Efficacy of preventing and treating bleeds were judged using objective criteria taking the monthly bleeding rate and the number of infusions needed to manage a break-through bleed into account. In-vivo recovery (IVR) was determined at the beginning of the study and after 3 and 6 months. FVIII:C was measured by validated chromogenic (CHR) and one-stage (OS) assays in a central laboratory, which also assigned drug potencies. Inhibitor activity was determined using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay before the first administration and at defined intervals thereafter. Thirty-two patients between 18 and 75 years of age were enrolled from 11 centres in Europe and treated prophylactically for 6.0±0.9 months (mean ± SD) with a mean prophylactic dose of 32.8 IU/kg. Sixteen patients never bled, 11 patients bled once and 5 more than once. The mean total and spontaneous monthly bleeding rate was 0.188±0.307 and 0.095±0.211, respectively. Efficacy of the prophylactic treatment was “excellent” in all patients for spontaneous BEs and “excellent” or “good” in all patients but one for all types of bleeds. All treatments of bleeds were rated as “excellent” (71.4%) or “good” (28.6%). The IVR at baseline was 2.6±0.5 % per IU/kg for the CHR and 2.2±0.5 % per IU/kg for the OS assay and remained stable during the study. A total of 2921 infusions were given in the study. Human-cl rhFVIII was well tolerated and no patient experienced a related serious adverse event. No FVIII inhibitors were detected. Conclusion: The data indicate that Human-cl rh FVIII is safe and efficacious in preventing and treating bleeds in PTPs with severe haemophlia A. Disclosures: Knaub: Octapharma AG: Employment. Lissitchkov:Octapharma AG: PI Other. Tuddenham:College London: Consultancy, Employment, Gene therapy for hemophilia A, Gene therapy for hemophilia A Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Collins:Octapharma AG: Consultancy. Oldenburg:d and e: Baxter, Bayer, Biotest, CSL-Behring, Grifols, Inspiration, NovoNordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer e: Biogen IDec, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bichler:Octapharma AG: Employment.

scholarly journals Real-World Clinical Management of Patients with Hemophilia and Inhibitors: Effectiveness and Safety of aPCC in Patients with >18 Months' Follow-up in the FEIBA Global Outcome Study (FEIBA GO)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2418-2418
Author(s):  
Jerzy Windyga ◽  
Pal A Holme ◽  
C. Hermans ◽  
Ana R Cid ◽  
Nirjhar Chatterjee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Outcome Study ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
Patient Consent ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: The primary objective of the FEIBA Global Outcome study (FEIBA GO) is to describe the long-term, real-world effectiveness and safety of activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC; Feiba®, Baxalta Inc, a Takeda company, Lexington, MA, USA) for preventing and managing bleeding in patients with congenital hemophilia A or B with inhibitors (PwHI) across different clinical settings. This interim >18-month analysis corresponds to the report of May 2019. Methods: FEIBA GO (EUPAS6691) is an ongoing post-authorization, prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study. Male PwHI diagnosed before study entry and prescribed treatment with aPCC will be followed over 4 years; treatment regimens are prescribed at the physician's discretion. Ethics approval and patient consent were obtained. Results: Enrollment was completed on December 31, 2017, with 53 PwHI from 27 sites in 11 countries (hemophilia A: n=52, hemophilia B: n=1; median [range] age at baseline: 18 [2-71] years). Total annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR) for all bleeds are shown in Table 1 for the 21 patients who received prophylaxis or on-demand aPCC and had >18 months of follow-up data. Of 15 patients who received aPCC prophylaxis, 4 (26.7%) and 7 (46.7%) reported ABRs of ≤3 and AJBRs of ≤3, respectively. All 53 enrolled patients were included in the safety analysis. During the >18 month analysis period, a total of 139 non-serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 29 of 53 patients (including 9 events in 3 patients probably related to treatment and 2 events in 1 patient possibly related), and 40 serious TEAEs were reported in 17 patients. One possibly related serious TEAE of acute myocardial posterior wall infarction with embolic right coronary artery occlusion was reported in a patient with a catheter port; outcome: recovered/resolved. No thrombotic microangiopathies were reported. Conclusions: This interim analysis of real-world data at >18 months' follow-up is consistent with experience and continues to validate the safety and effectiveness of aPCC. Long-term follow-up data over 4 years from FEIBA GO will provide further information on the real-world effectiveness and safety of aPCC as monotherapy. Disclosures Windyga: Rigel Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Werfen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Baxalta/Shire (a Takeda company): Honoraria, Research Funding; Ferring Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Alnylam: Honoraria, Research Funding; Siemens: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Honoraria, Research Funding. Holme:Sobi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire, a Takeda company: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria. Hermans:Shire, a Takeda company: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy. Cid:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria; Shire, a Takeda company: Honoraria. Chatterjee:Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jiang:Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cano-Garcia:Shire, a Takeda company: Employment, Equity Ownership. Escuriola:Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kedrion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire, a Takeda company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Endogenous Clotting Factor Activity and Long-term Outcome in Patients with Moderate Haemophilia

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (12) ◽  
pp. 977-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. van der Bom ◽  
E. P. Mauser-Bunschoten ◽  
G. Roosendaal ◽  
F. J. A. Beek ◽  
P. de Kleijn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Joint Damage ◽  
Clotting Factor ◽  
Factor Activity ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Percent Increase ◽  
Radiological Score

SummaryIn order to address the question of the optimum target level for prophylactic treatment of severe haemophilia patients, the association between endogenous clotting factor activity and outcome was studied in a cohort of 46 patients with moderate haemophilia. Data on treatment and outcome were collected annually.Median follow-up was 8.0 years (range 1-26). Median joint bleed frequency was 1 per year and median radiological score according to Pettersson was 1 point (max. 78) at the age of 25 years. One percent increase in clotting factor level was associated with a 4 months later onset of joint bleeds (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2-6 months) and a 16% lower Pettersson score (95% CI: 3-27%). No statistically significant effect of clotting factor activity on joint bleed frequency could be demonstrated.These findings confirm that patients with moderate haemophilia experience only mild arthropathy, and provide evidence for a protective effect of higher clotting factor levels on joint damage.

Abstract WP365: STARS PLUS Patient Transition Pilot Program

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Graves ◽  
Angie West ◽  
Miranda N Bretz ◽  
Marie Welch ◽  
Lynn Toth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Stroke Prevention ◽  
Recurrent Stroke ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
The United States ◽  
Lifestyle Changes ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Stroke Survivors ◽  
Pilot Program

Background: As the leading cause of adult disability and the fourth leading cause of death in the United States, stroke prevention strategies are imperative. Arguably equal attention should be given towards both primary and secondary prevention of stroke. While much is known about medications and lifestyle changes to prevent recurrent stroke, additional research is needed to effectively ensure stroke survivors are following the recommended guidelines. Research shows that support after discharge from the hospital post-stroke is frequently inadequate. Purpose: The purpose of the Steps Against Recurrent Stroke (STARS) Plus Patient Transition Pilot Program was to design and deliver a program to facilitate optimal recovery for stroke survivors and prevent recurrent stroke. The program began at discharge from the hospital and continued through the first year of rehabilitation and recovery. Patients could opt in based on perceived benefits of support with medication management, timed educational mailings and calls about stroke recovery and recurrent stroke prevention. Results: Twelve hospitals participated; 261 patients enrolled and contact was established with 193. Outcomes were gathered based on patient self-report of health status using the Standard Form 12 (SF-12) Health Survey at 30, 90, 180 and 360 days. A total of 72 patients completed each follow-up in the full 12 months of the program. A dependent sample t-test was completed comparing participants’ 30 and 360 day follow-up scores. Results demonstrated an overall increase in subjective pain. A repeated MANOVA was conducted to compare 30 and 360 day SF-12 scores across age and subscales. Results revealed that those in the younger and older age groups reported poorer health outcomes. Conclusion: STARS Plus Program found no statistically significant change in perceived health benefits, although the majority found the program to be beneficial. Future programs should consider targeting pain management in all ages and education targeted at younger and older age groups, as they reported poorer health outcomes. The findings from this program should contribute to the guidance and insight for others developing transitional interventions for stroke survivors.

Incidence and Outcome of Discontinuation of Prophylactic Treatment among Young Adults with Severe Hemophilia.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3086-3086
Author(s):  
Karin van Dijk ◽  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Johanna G. van der Bom ◽  
Elma Scheibel ◽  
Jørgen Ingerslev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Clinical Score ◽  
Annual Number ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
On Demand

Abstract Introduction Most of the current discussion about prophylaxis for severe hemophilia patients is on the dose and when to start. However, as hemophilia is a chronic disease, it is important to evaluate the duration of prophylaxis. The aim of this study was to study and compare adherence to prophylaxis and outcome of severe hemophilia patients. Methods All patients with severe hemophilia A and B (factor VIII/IX&lt;0.01 IU/ml), born between 1970 and 1980 and treated in Copenhagen, Århus (Denmark) or the Van Creveldkliniek, Utrecht (The Netherlands) were studied. Data on treatment were collected from the patients’ files from 1972 until 2003. In addition, a questionnaire on adherence to prophylaxis was used. For assessment of outcome the clinical score according to Gilbert and the radiological Pettersson score were used. Patients were categorized according to adherence to prophylactic treatment: patients who never discontinued prophylaxis (never), patients who temporarily discontinued prophylaxis (temporarily) and patients had switched to on demand regimen (permanently). Results 83 patients were studied. Median follow up was 19 years (range 6–29). Median age at start of prophylaxis was 5.9 years (interquartile range (IQR) 4.0–8.7). 34% of patients stopped taking prophylaxis temporarily and 35% stopped taking prophylaxis permanently at a median age of 21.5 years (IQR 18.4–24.4). Follow up since the last stop was 3.6 years (IQR 1.4–7.9), the annual number of joint bleeds on on demand treatment was 3.0 (IQR 1.4–8.7). The median clinical score was 3.0 points (IQR 1.0–6.0) in patients who never or temporarily stopped and 4.0 (IQR 0.0–6.3) in patients who permanently stopped taking prophylaxis. Pettersson scores were available for the Dutch patients and the median Pettersson score was 13 points (IQR 5–23) for patients who never or temporarily stopped and 13 (IQR 1–24) for patients who stopped permanently. The proportion of patients who discontinued prophylaxis and outcome parameters were similar for the Dutch and Danish patients. Conclusion Two thirds of young adults with severe hemophilia on prophylaxis discontinue prophylaxis at least once. One third permanently stop taking prophylaxis, while maintaining a low joint bleed frequency. Four years after switching to on demand treatment, outcome in these patients is similar to outcome in patients who continue taking prophylaxis.

Consumption Of FVIII Concentrate During On-Demand and Prophylactic Treatment With Human-cl rhFVIII In Prospective Clinical Studies In Adult Patients With Severe Hemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3595-3595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Tiede ◽  
Sigurd Knaub ◽  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Johann Bichler
Keyword(s):  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Human Cell Line ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Ample Evidence ◽  
Bleeding Rate ◽  
On Demand

Abstract Background There is ample evidence to support prophylactic treatment with factor VIII (FVIII) in children with severe hemophilia A (HA). Adults with severe HA are often treated on-demand and the potential benefit of regular prophylaxis is linked to a higher consumption of FVIII concentrates. During the clinical development of Human-cl rhFVIII, the first recombinant FVIII concentrate from a human cell line, its efficacy and safety was evaluated in previously treated adult patients (PTPs) during on-demand treatment only (GENA-01) and prophylaxis (GENA-08). Aims To compare post-hoc the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and the consumption of FVIII concentrate in patients treated exclusively on-demand with those treated prophylactically. Methods Both prospective multi-centre studies were approved by the Ethics Committees of each participating institution and informed consent was obtained from the patient prior to any trial activity. In GENA-01, patients were to be treated on-demand for ≥6 months and ≥50 exposure days with protocol recommended doses ranging from 20 to 60 IU/kg, depending on the severity of the bleed. In GENA-08, patients were to be treated prophylactically with Human-cl rhFVIII every other day with 30-40 IU/kg for ≥6 months. Human-cl rhFVIII was also to be used in case of breakthrough bleeds. Results 22 PTPs with severe HA were enrolled in GENA-01, and 32 in GENA-08. The study populations were reasonably well comparable to each other (GENA-01 vs. GENA-08, mean±SD), regarding age (39.6±14.1 vs. 37.3±13.6 years), body mass index (23.9±4.8 vs. 25.8±4.9 kg/m2), hemophilia joint health score (38.4±30.3 vs. 34.6±32.2), race (>80% White in both studies) and historical bleeding sites. In GENA-08, the majority of patients (65.6%) had been treated prophylactically prior to study entry. Their historical mean±SD ABR was 6.6 ±11.3 (median: 2.0, range: 0-48.7) and their mean prophylactic dose/month was 293 IU/kg. The other 11 patients who had been treated on-demand had a mean±SD ABR of 47.4±34.6 (median: 36.5, range: 12.2-121.7). In GENA-01, all but 2 patients were treated on-demand prior to study entry. The historical mean±SD ABR of all GENA-01 patients was 49.5±35.9 (median: 44.6, range: 2.0-158.7). The ABR and FVIII consumption during the studies are shown in Table 1. Conclusion The data suggest that regular prophylactic treatment with Human-cl rhFVIII in adult PTPs with severe HA resulted in an approximately 25-fold reduction of bleeding rate, and a 3-fold increase of FVIII concentrate consumption. Disclosures: Tiede: Octapharma AG: Consultancy, Investigator Other. Knaub:Octapharma AG: Employment. Oldenburg:Octapharma AG: Consultancy, Investigator Other. Bichler:Octapharma AG: Employment.

Bleeding Events and Safety Outcomes in Patients with Hemophilia a with Inhibitors: A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-Interventional Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3800-3800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnny Mahlangu ◽  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Michael U Callaghan ◽  
Midori Shima ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Prophylactic Treatment ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Legal Guardian ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Safety Outcomes ◽  
Bypassing Agents

Abstract Introduction: Coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency in hemophilia A (HA) patients (pts) results in spontaneous bleeding events, secondary arthropathy and diminished quality of life (QoL). FVIII replacement agents, the current standard of care, may require several infusions to treat bleeding events and infusions 2-3 times a week are needed for prevention of bleeding events due to relatively short half-lives. A major challenge of current therapies is development of anti-FVIII alloantibodies (inhibitors), which occur in 15-30% of HA pts, diminish effectiveness of FVIII replacement and are associated with significant morbidity and reduced QoL. Options for pts with inhibitors are limited. Bypassing agents to prevent/treat bleeding events, and immune tolerance induction to eliminate inhibitors, require frequent dosing, are not available in all countries, and have suboptimal efficacy. Thus, a high unmet need exists for safe, more effective and less burdensome options for pts with inhibitors. Emicizumab (ACE910), a bispecific monoclonal antibody in development for the management of HA, binds to FIXa and FX to mimic FVIII cofactor function and may be able to address current treatment needs. Real world data (RWD) collected from HA pts are considered of high importance for the emicizumab clinical development program, providing the possibility of intra-patient comparison for those who may be subsequently eligible to participate in a pivotal emicizumab Phase 3 study (NCT02622321). This non-interventional study (NIS) aims to prospectively collect detailed, high-quality data on bleeding events and safety outcomes in HA pts treated according to local routine clinical practice. In the first cohort (Cohort A), data from adult/adolescents with inhibitors were collected. Methods: This prospective NIS (NCT02476942) was approved by local Ethics review groups, and all pts and/or legal guardians signed informed consent/assent prior to study entry. In Cohort A, eligible pts were ≥12 years old and had congenital HA of any severity; documented history of high-titer FVIII inhibitors (≥5 Bethesda Units/mL); documented treatment with bypassing agents for ≥6 months; and, ≥6 or ≥2 bleeds in the last 6 months on episodic or prophylactic treatment, respectively. Primary objective was to characterize the number of bleeding events over time. Bleeding/bypassing agent data were collected through a bleed and medication questionnaire (BMQ) developed by the Sponsor, as no standard questionnaire is available. BMQ was completed by the pt/legal guardian via an electronic handheld device. Demographic data and medical history were collected from pts' medical records on an electronic Case Report Form. Throughout the study, investigators recorded adverse events (AEs), concomitant medication, and routine laboratory assessment data. At least monthly interactions of pts/legal guardian with a professional from their treatment center were requested to confirm self-reported bleed/medication information. Results: 103 HA pts with inhibitors (75 on episodic and 28 on prophylactic regimens with bypassing agents) from 33 centers and 12 countries were enrolled in Cohort A. As of 7/21/16, 54 pts had rolled over to the emicizumab Phase 3 study in adults/adolescents with inhibitors. The following Cohort A data will be presented: pt demographics/characteristics; global distribution of pts by country; summary of hemophilia medical history, concomitant medications and surgeries; pts' self-reported information on bleeding events and treatment (all, and by episodic and prophylactic treatment), including bleeding rates, types and locations, reason for coagulation product use, product type used, dose; and, safety. Conclusion: The NIS will provide high quality documentation of bleeding events and safety outcomes in adult/adolescent HA pts with inhibitors treated with bypassing agents according to local clinical practice. For those participating in the ongoing Phase 3 emicizumab study, these data will provide the opportunity to perform robust intra-patient comparisons of prospectively collected bleeding event/medication data before and during emicizumab treatment. This is the first report of prospective RWD being collected for use as a valid historical control for a pivotal Phase 3 study in HA pts with inhibitors, and a novel and unique approach to bolster data reported in the clinical development of emicizumab. Disclosures Mahlangu: Bayer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Consultancy. Callaghan:Grifols: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Baxalta: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria; Biogen: Honoraria. Shima:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Sysmex Corporation: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Santagostino:Bayer: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Kedrion: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Baxalta: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Biogen Idec: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Lehle:Roche: Employment. Uguen:Roche: Employment. Hirst:F. Hoffmann La-Roche Ltd: Employment; AstraZeneca: Other: Previous employment . Recht:Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding; Kedrion: Consultancy. Kruse-Jarres:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Baxalta: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Real-World Outcomes for Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Treated with Tisagenlecleucel: Update from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Registry

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 428-428
Author(s):  
Samuel John ◽  
Michael A. Pulsipher ◽  
Amy Moskop ◽  
Zhen-Huan Hu ◽  
Christine L. Phillips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Advisory Boards

Abstract Background: Tisagenlecleucel is an autologous CD19-directed T-cell immunotherapy indicated in the USA for treatment of patients up to 25 years (y) of age with B-cell ALL that is refractory or in second or later relapse. Overall response rate was 82% with 24 months' (mo) follow-up in the registrational ELIANA trial [Grupp et al. Blood 2018]; pooled data from ELIANA and ENSIGN revealed similar outcomes upon stratification by age (&lt;18y and ≥18y) [Rives et al. HemaSphere 2018]. Early real-world data for tisagenlecleucel from the CIBMTR registry reported similar efficacy to ELIANA with no new safety signals [Pasquini et al. Blood Adv 2020]. Outcomes are reported here for patients who received tisagenlecleucel in the real-world setting, stratified by age (&lt;18y and ≥18y). Methods: This noninterventional prospective study used data from the CIBMTR registry and included patients aged ≤25y with R/R ALL. Eligible patients received commercial tisagenlecleucel after August 30, 2017, in the USA or Canada. Age-specific analyses were conducted in patients aged &lt;18y and ≥18y at the time of infusion. Efficacy was assessed in patients with ≥12mo follow-up at each reporting center and included best overall response (BOR) of complete remission (CR), duration of response (DOR), event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety was evaluated in all patients who completed the first (100-day) assessment. Adverse events (AEs) of interest - including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity - were monitored throughout the reporting period. CRS and neurotoxicity were graded using the ASTCT criteria. Results: As of October 30, 2020, data from 451 patients were collected, all of whom received tisagenlecleucel. The median time from receipt of leukapheresis product at the manufacturing site to shipment was 27 days (interquartile range: 25-34). Patients aged ≥18y appeared to have greater disease burden at baseline than those aged &lt;18y, indicated by lower rates of morphologic CR and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity prior to infusion. Older patients were also more heavily pre-treated before infusion. All other patient characteristics at baseline were comparable between the two groups (Table 1). In the efficacy set (median follow-up 21.5mo; range 11.9-37.2; N=322), BOR of CR was 87.3% (95% CI 83.1-90.7); MRD status was available for 150 patients, of whom 98.7% were MRD negative. Median DOR was 23.9mo (95% CI 12.3-not estimable [NE]), median EFS was 14.0mo (9.8-24.8) and median RFS was 23.9mo (13.0-NE); 12mo EFS and RFS were 54.3% and 62.3%, respectively. For OS, the median was not reached. Efficacy outcomes were generally similar across age groups (Table 1). In the safety set (median follow-up 20.0mo; range 2.6-37.2; N=400), most AEs of interest occurred within 100 days of infusion. Any-grade CRS was observed in 58.0% of patients; Grade ≥3 in 17.8%. Treatment for CRS included tocilizumab (n=113; 28.3% of all patients) and corticosteroids (n=31; 7.8%). Neurotoxicity was observed in 27.3% of patients; Grade ≥3 in 10.0%. Treatment for neurotoxicity included tocilizumab (n=17; 4.3% of all patients) and corticosteroids (n=28; 7.0%). During the reporting period, 82 (20.5%) patients died; the most common cause of death was recurrence/persistence/progression of primary disease. CRS and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome were the primary cause of death in 2 patients and 1 patient, respectively. Overall, safety data were similar across age groups, although more patients aged ≥18y experienced any-grade CRS or neurotoxicity and were subsequently treated (Table 1). Conclusions: Updated registry data for pediatric and young adult patients with R/R ALL treated with tisagenlecleucel revealed that patients aged ≥18y had a greater disease burden and were more heavily pre-treated at baseline than patients aged &lt;18y. The overall efficacy and safety profiles of commercial tisagenlecleucel reflected those observed in the clinical trial setting [Grupp et al. Blood 2018; Rives et al. HemaSphere 2018] and were broadly consistent across age groups. Some important differences between the &lt;18y and ≥18y groups were identified, which may point to challenges in timely identification and/or referral of older patients for CAR-T cell therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pulsipher: Equillium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Research Funding; Jasper Therapeutics: Honoraria. Hu: Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Phillips: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Margossian: Cue Biopharma, Inc.: Current Employment; Novartis: Other: Ad hoc Advisory Boards. Nikiforow: Kite/Gilead: Other: Ad hoc advisory boards; Novartis: Other: Ad hoc advisory boards; Iovance: Other: Ad hoc advisory boards; GlaxoSmithKline (GSK): Other: Ad hoc advisory boards. Martin: Novartis: Other: Local PI for clinical trial; Bluebird Bio: Other: Local PI for clinical trial. Rouce: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Tiwari: Novartis Healthcare private limited: Current Employment. Redondo: Novartis: Current Employment. Willert: Novartis: Current Employment. Agarwal: Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Pasquini: Kite Pharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Grupp: Novartis, Roche, GSK, Humanigen, CBMG, Eureka, and Janssen/JnJ: Consultancy; Novartis, Kite, Vertex, and Servier: Research Funding; Novartis, Adaptimmune, TCR2, Cellectis, Juno, Vertex, Allogene and Cabaletta: Other: Study steering committees or scientific advisory boards; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Steering committee, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Survival of Mantle Cell Lymphoma in the Era of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Population-Based Analysis

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 182-182
Author(s):  
Mengyang Di ◽  
Can Cui ◽  
Shalin K. Kothari ◽  
Amer M. Zeidan ◽  
Nikolai Podoltsev ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Bruton Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Support Research

Abstract Background: Despite advances in chemoimmunotherapy and stem cell transplantation, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has historically been difficult to treat. Patients with advanced age and high-risk features (e.g. blastoid/pleomorphic features, high MIPI score, complex karyotype, TP53 mutation) face particularly poor outcomes with standard chemoimmunotherapy. Ibrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), was approved for second-line use in MCL in 2013. Other BTKis - acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib were approved in 2017 and 2019, respectively. BTKi provides a well-tolerated chemotherapy-free option for these hard-to-treat subgroups, especially the older patients. In this population-based study, we evaluated survival outcomes prior to and after the approval of ibrutinib, and hypothesized that survival benefit observed early after approval would be greatest in older patients not typically candidates for consolidative transplantation in the first-line setting. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we included all adult patients diagnosed with MCL in the years 2007-2018 and followed them to the end of 2018 or death, whichever came first. The pre-BTKi era was defined by year of diagnosis 2007-2011, and the BTKi era was between 2014 and 2018. The years 2012-2013 were considered as a "washout" period to allow practice change related to the approval of ibrutinib. As age plays an important role in treatment decisions, including whether to use consolidative transplantation, patients were divided based on age at diagnosis: &lt;60, 60-69, 70-79, and ≥80 years. Outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, and mortality from MCL (MFM). We applied multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model for all-cause mortality, adjusting for age, sex, race, stage, and median household income at census level, and reported adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We also conducted multivariable competing risk analyses for MFM, considering all other causes of death as the competing events, and reported subhazard ratio (sHR) with 95% CI. To eliminate potential confounding by duration of follow-up among patients diagnosed in different periods, we used only three-year follow-up data for primary analyses, and all available follow-up data for sensitivity analyses. Results: We identified 7,625 individuals diagnosed with MCL during our study period (3,424 and 4,201 diagnosed during 2007-2011 and 2014-2018, respectively). The majority were male (71%) and white (90%), with 49% of patients 70 years or older. The median follow-up was 9.2 and 2.4 years for patients diagnosed during 2007-2011 and 2014-2018, respectively. The 3-year all-cause mortality and 3-year MFM rates were 39.8% and 27.3%, respectively, in the overall population. Both the 3-year all-cause mortality and MFM increased as age increased. The 3-year all-cause mortality was lower in the BTKi era among all age groups, except patients &lt;60 years old, and the 3-year MFM was lower in the BTKi era among all age groups. The numeric difference of 3-year outcomes was more substantial in patients aged 70-79 for both all-cause mortality (pre-BTKi era: 47.8%, BTKi era: 40.4%) and MFM (pre-BTKi era: 33.9%, BTKi era: 27.5%) (Table, Figure A and B). In the multivariable analyses, risk of death was significantly lower during the BTKi era in the 60-69 (HR:0.85, 95% CI: 0.72-1.00) and 70-79 (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.92) age groups. MFM was also significantly lower during the BTKi era in these two age groups (60-69: sHR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64-0.94; 70-79: sHR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.65-0.90, Table). The results were largely unchanged in sensitivity analyses (results not shown). Conclusion: In this large population-based cohort analysis of individuals diagnosed with MCL, overall and lymphoma-specific survival improved in the BTKi era. At a median follow up of 2.4 years in our BTKi cohort, significant survival benefits were observed in those older than 60 but less than 80 years of age, and the observed benefits were greatest in the 70-79 age group. Future real-world studies should examine the impact of novel agents on treatment patterns and outcomes of MCL over a longer follow up period. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kothari: Incyte pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria. Zeidan: Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Jasper: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeyondSpring: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioCryst: Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Travel support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees, Research Funding; Ionis: Consultancy; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Astex: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Geron: Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Pfizer: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Kura: Consultancy, Other: Clinical Trial Committees; Aprea: Consultancy, Research Funding. Podoltsev: PharmaEssentia: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squib: Honoraria; CTI BioPharma: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria. Neparidze: Janssen: Research Funding; Eidos Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Shallis: Curis: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Ma: Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Huntington: AbbVie: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; SeaGen: Consultancy; DTRM Biopharm: Research Funding; Flatiron Health Inc.: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bayer: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Thyme Inc: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document