Importance of Achieving Sustained Stringent Complete Response (sCR) Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1988-1988
Author(s):  
Prashant Kapoor ◽  
Morie A Gertz ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Martha Q Lacy ◽  
David Dingli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Response Category ◽  
Landmark Analysis

Abstract Abstract 1988 Background With the utilization of novel agent-based combination therapies and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM), the rigorous response category of stringent complete remission (sCR) in the international uniform response criteria is increasingly becoming attainable. In addition to the standard criteria for complete remission (CR), sCR requires normalization of the free light chain ratio and disappearance of clonal cells as determined by the marrow immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry. We have previously validated the new response category of sCR created in by the International Myeloma Working Group and demonstrated that sCR represents a deeper level of response, translating into a superior OS. Herein we report the survival outcomes of patients attaining sCR or standard CR, from a 2-year landmark after ASCT in a cohort of patients with extended follow-up. Additionally, we report the outcome of patients who remained in sCR for at least 6 months (sustained-sCR) after ASCT. Patients and Methods Maximal response rates of four hundred and forty-five consecutive patients who underwent ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis of MM were determined. The population achieving varying degrees of complete remission (n=237) is the focus of this study. We performed a landmark analysis 2 years after ASCT to ensure that all the patients attaining at least CR had sufficient time to reach the response levels being studied. Patients were categorized as having sustained sCR (sus-sCR) if the duration of sCR was at least 6 months. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan Meier method and the survival curves were compared by log-rank test. Results The median follow-up of the entire cohort was seventy-seven months (95% CI: 73–82 months). The sCR rate after ASCT was 24% (n=109). Median time to progression (TTP) of patients attaining sCR was 50 months from ASCT, and median overall survival (OS) is not reached, in contrast to those attaining standard CR (n=37, TTP=20 months, OS=81 months) or near CR/nCR (n=91; TTP= 19 months, OS=60 months, p<0.0001 for both TTP and OS). OS of patients surviving at least 2 years from ASCT (Figure 1a) continued to remain superior for those attaining sCR (n=105, median: not reached) versus 70 months for the CR group (n=32; p=0.004). Among patients achieving sCR (n=109), OS of patients with sus-sCR (n= 75) at 6 months from ASCT is not reached (5-year OS=91%, 7-year OS=86%) versus median OS of 66 months (5-year OS=49%, 7-year OS=37%; p<0.0001) for those who had non-sustained-sCR (n=34) after ASCT (Figure 1b). Conclusion In our landmark analysis of patients with MM who survived at least 2 years from ASCT, those attaining sCR have a markedly superior outcome compared to those attaining standard CR. However, among patients attaining sCR, those with sustained sCR of 6 months or greater had the best outcome. Myeloma trials reporting response rates should identify patients achieving sCR and CR separately owing to markedly disparate outcomes of the two categories. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

High Dose (HD-AraC) Vs Standard Dose Cytosine Arabinoside (SD-AraC) During Induction and IL-2 Vs Observation After Consolidation/Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML): Final Report of the AML-12 Trial of EORTC and GIMEMA Leukemia Groups on the Value of Low Dose IL-2 Maintenance,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3612-3612
Author(s):  
Roelof Willemze ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Franco Mandelli ◽  
Stijn J.M. Halkes ◽  
Jean-Pierre Marie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Daily Dose

Abstract Abstract 3612 The AML-12 randomized phase III trial of the EORTC and GIMEMA Leukemia Groups assessed the efficacy and toxicity of HD-AraC (3 g/sqm/12 hrs for 4 days) combined with daunorubicin (50 mg/sqm/d for 3 days) and etoposide (50 mg/sqm/d for 5 days) vs SD-AraC (100 mg/sqm/d for 10 days) combined with the same drugs, in previously untreated AML < 61 year old patients (APL excluded). Patients (pts) in complete remission (CR) received consolidation consisting of AraC (500 mg/sqm/12 hrs for 6 days) and daunorubicin (50 mg/sqm/d for 3 days). Subsequently an allogeneic (allo-SCT) or autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) was planned according to donor availability and age. A 2nd randomization was performed after consolidation in pts without a donor: auto-SCT followed or not by low dose IL-2 (4-8 × 106 IU/d s.c. for 5 days per month) during one year. A total of 577 pts were required to be randomized for the 2nd question in order to reach 255 events (relapses or deaths) which would allow to detect a 11.5% increase in the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) from 50% to 61.5% corresponding to hazard ratio (HR) = 0.70 (2-sided alpha=5%, statistical power=80%). Randomization was performed centrally; the 2nd randomization was stratified for induction treatment, cytogenetic/molecular genetic group, number of courses to reach CR, auto-SCT planned (No/Yes) and center. Intent-to-treat analysis was done in eligible pts. From 9/1999 till 1/2008, 2005 pts were randomized (891 by EORTC-LG and 1114 by GIMEMA). In addition 104 pts (GIMEMA) were registered to receive SD-AraC (+etoposide+daunorubicine) in induction. Due to insufficient reporting, 3 centers, who recruited 63 pts, have been excluded from the analysis. After 1 or 2 courses of induction, CR was achieved in 1500 pts. Between 4/2000 and 5/2008 544 pts have been randomized for the IL-2 question, of whom 528 (222 EORTC, 306 GIMEMA) met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis: 263 in IL-2, 265 in Observation (Obs) arm; the remaining pts have not been randomized due to prolonged hypoplasia after consolidation or after auto-SCT, or refusal of the patient or a planned allo-SCT. The two groups were well balanced with respect to the above mentioned stratification factors. Due to prolonged pancytopenia after auto-SCT, severe organ damage or infection after auto-SCT, early relapse or patient refusal, 165 pts actually received IL-2 and 197 pts were adequately documented in the Obs arm. During the first 4 months 82% of the pts in the IL-2 arm received a mean daily dose of 6 × 106 IU and 62% of the pts received the maximally required 20 s.c. injections; the remaining stopped due to relapse (22%) or toxicity (16%). During the second 4 months, out of 103 pts 82% in the IL-2 arm received a mean daily dose of 6 × 106 IU and 76% of the pts received the maximally required 20 s.c. injections; the remaining stopped due to relapse (15%), toxicity/refusal (6%) or other reasons (2%). During the third 4 months, among 79 of the pts in the IL-2 arm 80% received a mean daily dose of 6 × 106 IU and 85% of the pts received the maximally required 20 s.c. injections. Grade 3–4 toxicity was more frequent in the IL-2 compared to Obs arm and consisted of hypersensitivity (3% vs 0%), fatigue (7.9% vs 1%), rigor/chills (6.1% vs 0%), arthralgia/myalgia (3.6% vs 0%). For the total of 528 pts, the median follow-up from the 2nd randomization was 6 years. As of July 2011, a total of 308 events were reported: 150 (IL-2 arm) vs 158 (Obs arm); among them 277 relapses (137 vs 140) and 31 deaths without relapses (13 vs 18). The DFS from 2nd randomization was similar in the 2 groups: the 5-yr DFS rate was 44.2% (IL-2) vs 40.4% (Obs), hazard ratio (HR)=0.95, 95% CI (0.76,1.19), p=0.66. A total of 259 pts died: 128 (IL-2 arm) vs 131 (Obs. arm). The 5-yr overall survival rate was 52.2% (IL-2) vs 50.9% (Obs), HR=0.98, 95% CI (0.77,1.26), p=0.9. The initial remission induction treatment (received/randomized) did not have impact on the results after the 2nd randomization. Conclusion: This study shows that, with a median follow-up of 6 years, low dose IL-2 maintenance does not lead to a prolonged DFS and overall survival in pts with AML in first complete remission treated in the EORTC-GIMEMA AML12 trial. Disclosures: Muus: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. de Witte:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Outcome Results From the Open-Label, Randomized Phase III Myeloma X Trial Evaluating Salvage Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (19) ◽  
pp. 1617-1628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam H. Ahmedzai ◽  
John A. Snowden ◽  
Andrew John Ashcroft ◽  
David Allan Cairns ◽  
Cathy Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Random Assignment ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Patient Reported

PURPOSE Salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation (sASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) relapsing after a prior autologous stem-cell transplantation leads to increased remission duration and overall survival. We report a comprehensive study on patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life (QoL) and pain in sASCT. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to either sASCT or nontransplantation consolidation (NTC). Pain and QoL were assessed as secondary outcomes using validated QoL instruments (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and myeloma-specific module, QLQ-MY20; the Brief Pain Inventory [Short Form]; and the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs [Self-Assessment] scale). RESULTS A total of 288 patients (> 96%) consented to the QoL substudy. The median follow-up was 52 months. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 Global health status scores were higher (better) in the NTC group at 100 days after random assignment ( P = .0496), but not at later time points. Pain interference was higher (worse) in the sASCT group than in the NTC group at 6 months after random assignment ( P = .0267), with patients with sASCT reporting higher scores for Pain interference with daily living for up to 2 years after random assignment. Patients reporting lower concerns about adverse effects of treatment after sASCT had a time to progression advantage. CONCLUSION Patients with sASCT with relapsed MM demonstrated a comparative reduction in QoL and greater impact of treatment adverse effects lasting for 6 months and up to 2 years for pain, after which patients who had received sASCT reported better outcomes. Patients who experienced lower adverse effects after sASCT had longer time to progression and overall survival, showing the need to improve symptom management peritransplantation. To our knowledge, this study provides the most comprehensive picture of QoL before and after sASCT in patients with relapsed MM.

Immunotherapy with Rituximab after Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5232-5232
Author(s):  
Celso Mitsushi Massumoto ◽  
Edilson Pinheiro Junior ◽  
Otávio C.G. Baiocchi ◽  
Ronald Pinheiro ◽  
Adelson Alves
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
High Dose

Abstract Introduction: autologous stem cell transplantation is a potentially curative or may augment the time to progression in Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients. The immunotherapy with rituximab may help control the minimal residual disease after high dose chemotherapy. Twenty percent (20%) of Multiple Myeloma patients express the CD20+ protein and can be target for immunotherapy. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of rituximab after autologous stem cell transplantation for Multiple Myeloma. Patients and Methods: eight patients (4 male) with a median age of 53 (range 43–59) years diagnosed with MM. All of them had received at least one previous regimen were enrolled in the protocol study. All patients signed the consent form. Patients in relapse received a salvage regimen with C-VAD n=2 (cyclofosfamide 4 g/m2 e vincristine 0.4 mg/d (d 1–4), doxorrubicin 0.9 mg/m2 (d1-4) e dexametasone 40 mg (d1-4; 9-12; 17–22) or cyclofosfamide (1OO mg/kg, n=7) followed by stem cell harvesting. The preparative regimen was Busulfan 12 mg/kg and cyclofosfamide 120 mg/kg or Melphalan 200mg/m2. Rituximab at a dose of 375mg/m2 weekly x 4 was given every 6 months for 2 years after SCT. The clinical characteristics of the patients are shown on Table 1. Results: the median time to ANC and platelets engraftment was 11 (range 8–12) and 26 (range 17–35) days. Patients have been in CR at a median time of 11 months follow-up. Minor Rituximab-associated toxicities were seen:rigor, fever and short of breath that were controlled with acetaminophen and diphenidramine. Conclusion: the Rituximab given after autologous stem cell transplantation is safe in Multiple Myeloma patients and may prolong time to disease progression. A randomized study is required to evaluate the role of rituximab after ASCT. Table 1 - Clinical Characteristics of Patients Patients Age/gender Status Pre- BMT Status Post- BMT Salvage Tx Prep. regimen ANC/Platelets X1000 MM3/ml Follow-up (months) FRC 57/M PR PR C-VAD BU+MEL 12/28 EXPIRED MB 52/F CR1 CR1 C-VAD BU+MEL 12/60 EXPIRED AM 52/F PR PR C-VAD BU+MEL 9/26 EXPIRED IM 54/M PR CR Cyx2 BU+MEL 12/21 ALIVE GAD 50/F PR CR Cyx2 BU+MEL 12/35 ALIVE SCM 59/M CR CR Cyx2 BU+MEL 10/17 ALIVE MAD 63/F CR CR C-VAD MELPHALAN 12/25 ALIVE JFC 51/M CR CR C-VAD BU+MEL 12/18 ALIVE

High Dose (HD-AraC) Vs Standard Dose Cytosine Arabinoside (SD-AraC) During Induction and IL-2 Vs Observation After Consolidation/Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML): Final Report of the AML-12 Trial of EORTC and GIMEMA Leukemia Groups on the Value of High Dose AraC

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 257-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roelof Willemze ◽  
Stefan Suciu ◽  
Franco Mandelli ◽  
Giovanna Meloni ◽  
Boris Labar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Treatment Difference

Abstract Abstract 257 The AML-12 randomized phase III trial of EORTC-LG and GIMEMA assessed the efficacy and toxicity of HD-AraC (3 g/sqm/12 hrs for 4 days) combined with daunorubicin (50 mg/sqm/d for 3 days) and etoposide (50 mg/sqm/d for 5 days) vs SD-AraC (100 mg/sqm/d for 10 days) with the same drugs, in previously untreated AML < 61 year old patients (APL excluded). Patients (pts) in complete remission (CR) had to receive consolidation consisting of AraC (500 mg/sqm/12 hrs for 6 days) and daunorubicin. Subsequently an allogeneic (allo-SCT) or autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) was planned according to donor availability and age. A 2nd randomization had to be done after evaluation of consolidation in pts without a donor: auto-SCT followed or not by low dose IL-2. The aim of the trial was to detect an 8% treatment difference (from 35% to 43%) in the 5-yr overall survival (OS) rate, corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.80 (alpha=5%, power=95%); secondary endpoints were response to induction, toxicity, disease-free survival (DFS) from CR. Randomization was performed centrally; the 1st randomization was stratified for age (<46 vs > 45 yrs), performance status, WBC and center. Intent-to-treat analysis was done. From 9/1999 till 1/2008, 2005 pts from 68 centers were randomized. Due to insufficient reporting, 3 centers, who recruited 63 patients, have been excluded from the analysis. The remaining 1942 pts (872 pts entered by EORTC-LG and 1070 by GIMEMA) 969 were randomized in SD-AraC and 973 in HD-AraC arm; among them 25 and 28, respectively, were ineligible, but kept in the analysis. Both arms were comparable with respect to gender, age (median=45 yrs), disease history, initial leukocyte count, PS, FAB and cytogenetics. At a median follow up of 6 yrs, 1114 pts had died. Results: After 1 or 2 courses of induction, CR was achieved in 1430 pts (73.6%); 684 (71.9%) pts (SD-AraC group) vrs 746 (78.7%) pts (HD-AraC group): p=0.002. Resistance was documented in 173 (18.2%) vrs 123 (13%), and death during induction in 85 (8.9%) vrs 71 (7.5%) pts, respectively. Induction toxicity profile and grade was similar in the 2 arms except for conjunctivitis grade 3: HD-AraC>SD-AraC. CR rates for pts<46 yrs were 74.7% (SD-AraC) and 81.4% (HD-AraC) and for pts>45 yrs 66.4% (SD-AraC) and 71.8% (HD-AraC). 634 pts (SD-AraC and 686 (HD-AraC) received a consolidation cycle. Among 765 CR-pts<46 yrs 284 pts had an HLA identical sibling (<46D) and 481 did not or had not been typed (<46NoD). Among 665 CR-pts>45 yrs 225 pts had an HLA identical sibling (>45D) and 440 did not or had not been typed (>45NoD). In the <46D group 211 underwent an allo-SCT and 11 an auto-SCT. In the <46NoD group 274 underwent an auto-SCT and 29 a MUD-SCT; in the >45D group 147 underwent an allo-SCT and 14 an auto-SCT. In the >45NoD group 244 underwent an auto-SCT and 12 a MUD-SCT. Comparisons of treatments arm regarding OS from randomization, DFS and Survival (S) from CR are indicated in the Table. The impact of age on the treatment difference regarding OS was almost significant (p=0.06). In pts >45 who reached CR, the decrease in the relapse rate in the HD-Ara-C arm vrs SD-Ara-C arm (45.5% vs 49.4%) was counterbalanced by an increase in the death in CR rate (18.4% vs 13.2%). Conclusion: The final evaluation of the EORTC-GIMEMA AML-12 trial shows that, with a median follow-up of 6 years, HD-AraC in the induction treatment leads to a significantly higher CR rate than SD-Ara-C and results in improvement in overall survival but only in pts under the age of 46 years. Disclosures: Muus: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Beksac:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Third Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4548-4548
Author(s):  
Catherine Garnett ◽  
Chrissy Giles ◽  
Maialen Lasa ◽  
Osman Ahmed ◽  
Marco Bua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant

Abstract Abstract 4548 High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is currently standard treatment for younger patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In the face of almost inevitable disease relapse, there is growing evidence for second ASCT as salvage therapy in certain patient groups. However, few published data exist regarding efficacy and safety of third ASCT in relapsed disease. We retrospectively analysed the results of eight patients treated at a single UK institution who each received three separate autologous stem cell transplants for relapsed MM between May 1997 and April 2012. There were four men and four women. Median age at diagnosis was 48 years (range, 25–64 years). Paraprotein isotype was IgA in two patients and IgG in the remaining six patients. At the time of 1st transplant, seven patients were in partial response (PR) and one in complete response (CR). Conditioning melphalan dose was 200mg/m2 in all but two patients who received 140mg/m2. Three patients entered CR following 1st transplant and four patients showed PR. Median time to disease progression was 31 months (range, 11.8–52.9 months). Prior to 2nd transplant, five patients achieved very good partial response (VGPR) and three PR with induction chemotherapy. Melphalan dose was 200mg/m2 in five patients and 140mg/m2 in the remaining three. Median time to disease progression was 22.3 months (range, 10.1– 39.6 months). At the time of 3rd transplant, two patients had achieved VGPR following induction chemotherapy, one showed PR, two stable disease (SD) and three evidence of disease progression. For the 3rd transplant, melphalan dose was reduced in most cases. Median follow up post 3rd transplant was 8.3 months (range 1.1–29.3 months). One patient died of overwhelming sepsis within one month of transplantation (treatment related mortality). At the time of analysis, five patients had relapsed following 3rd ASCT, with median time to disease progression of 10.4 months (range, 2.7–23.7 months). Three of these patients died at 3.5, 17.6 and 27.1 months post 3rd transplant. The remaining two patients are alive with no evidence of disease relapse (progression free survival (PFS) time of 3.3 and 1.3 months). Overall survival (OS) for the group from diagnosis is 62% at 10 years with a median OS from diagnosis of 149 months (range 68.5 – 189.2 months) (Figure 1). Median OS for the group from 3rd transplant is 17.6 months (range, 1.1–29.3 months) (Figure 2). Median PFS is 10.4 months (range 1.1–23.7 months). These results demonstrate that third ASCT is a possible treatment strategy for patients with relapsed MM and may prolong patient survival. Figure 1: Overall survival from diagnosis for patients receiving 3rd autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed multiple myeloma Figure 1:. Overall survival from diagnosis for patients receiving 3rd autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed multiple myeloma Figure 2: Overall survival from time of 3rd autologous stem cell transplant Figure 2:. Overall survival from time of 3rd autologous stem cell transplant Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

P53 Gene Deletion Detected by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Is an Adverse Prognostic Factor for Patients with Multiple Myeloma Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4884-4884
Author(s):  
Xiao Ying Qi ◽  
Qi Long Yi ◽  
Donna Reece ◽  
A. Keith Stewart ◽  
Hong Chang
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
P53 Gene ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose

Abstract We investigated the relevance of p53 deletions to the clinical outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Hemizygous p53 gene deletions were detected by cytoplasmic Ig-enhanced interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (cIg-FISH) in 10 of 105 (9.5%) patients studied. p53 deletions were associated with higher serum calcium (p=0.0062) and creatinine (p=0.013) levels but there were no association with patient age, gender, β-2 microglobulin, C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, albumin, bone lytic lesions, or immunoglobulin isotype. There were no association of p53 deletions with chromosome 13q deletions, translocation t(11;14) or t(4;14). The overall response rates were similar in patients with and without p53 deletions (67% vs 71%). However, patients with p53 deletions had significantly shorter progression free (median 7.9 vs. 25.7 months, p=0.0324) and overall survival (median 14.7 vs. 48.1 months, p=0.0008) than patients without a p53 deletion. A multivariate analysis confirmed p53 deletion was an independent prognostic factor predicting shortened progression free (p=0.0009) or overall survival (p=0.0002) in myeloma patients after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document