Autologous HSCT for Ph-Positive Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Curative Option in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors? an Analysis From the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 233-233
Author(s):  
Sebastian Giebel ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Norbert Claude Gorin ◽  
Denis Caillot ◽  
Thibaut Leguay ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 233 Outcome of patients with Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) improved markedly with the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used in combination with chemotherapy. However, despite very high rate of complete remissions the possibility of cure with conventional-dose treatment remains questionable. Hence, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is still considered a standard of care. Patients lacking appropriate donor are usually treated with TKI-based maintenance. Autologous HSCT could be an alternative approach, however, due to “negative” results of a series of prospective studies run in XX. century its use has been limited. The goal of the current analysis was to retrospectively analyze if results of autoHSCT for Ph+ ALL changed over time. Results of 171 autologous transplantations performed in the first complete remission between 1996–2010 and reported to the EBMT registry have been analyzed. Median patient age was 48.3 (19–65) years. Conditioning regimen was based on either TBI (63%) or chemotherapy (37%). Peripheral blood was used as a source of stem cells in 84% cases. With the median follow-up of 2 years, in the whole study group, the probability of the overall survival (OS) at 2 years was 45% (+/−4%) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) was 32% (+/−4%). The cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 54% (+/−4%) and 13% (+/−3%), respectively. LFS rates were comparable for TBI and chemotherapy-based conditioning (34% vs. 29%, p=0.53). As well, the source of stem cells had no impact on LFS (32% for PB vs. 33% for BM, p=0.91). The 2 year probability of LFS increased from 22% for transplants performed between 1996–2000 (n=70) to 32% between 2001–2006 (n=61) and 54% between 2007–2010 (n=40), p<0.001 (Fig). In respective periods the RI decreased from 65% to 47% and 46% (p=0.01), while NRM was 11%, 21% and 0% (p=0.03). In a multivariate analysis the year of transplantation (<2007 vs. 2007–2010) was the only factor independently influencing the risk of treatment failure (HR=2.98, 95%CI, 1.54–5.79; p=0.001). We conclude that results of autologous HSCT for Ph+ ALL improved markedly in recent period with more than half of patients being alive and leukemia-free at 2 years. Therefore, it appears than in the era of TKIs autologous HSCT may be considered potentially curative option. The advantage is probably associated with more profound responses achieved with TKIs, which, however requires confirmation in a separate analysis. As well, the role of post-transplant maintenance remains to be determined. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Chemotherapy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingying Ma ◽  
Quanchao Zhang ◽  
Peiyan Kong ◽  
Jingkang Xiong ◽  
Xi Zhang ◽  
...  

With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has entered a new era. The efficacy of TKIs compared with other ALL treatment options is emphasized by a rapid increase in the number of TKI clinical trials. Subsequently, the use of traditional approaches, such as combined chemotherapy and even allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), for the treatment of ALL is being challenged in the clinic. In light of the increased use of TKIs in the clinic, several questions have been raised. First, is it necessary to use intensive chemotherapy during the induction course of therapy to achieve a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status? Must a patient reach a complete molecular response/major molecular response before receiving allo-HSCT? Does MRD status affect long-term survival after allo-HSCT? Is auto-HSCT an appropriate alternative for allo-HSCT in those Ph+ ALL patients who lack suitable donors? Here, we review the recent literature in an attempt to summarize the current status of TKI usage in the clinic, including several new therapeutic approaches, provide answers for the above questions, and speculate on the future direction of TKI utilization for the treatment of Ph+ ALL patients.


Haematologica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. e133-e134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Duployez ◽  
Guillaume Grzych ◽  
Benoît Ducourneau ◽  
Martin Alarcon Fuentes ◽  
Nathalie Grardel ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (16) ◽  
pp. 1351-1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Tanasi ◽  
Ibrahima Ba ◽  
Nicolas Sirvent ◽  
Thorsten Braun ◽  
Wendy Cuccuini ◽  
...  

Abstract Tanasi et al present a prospective strategy for identifying patients with Philadelphia-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia, demonstrating the efficacy of early introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in improving outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document