Overall Safety and Treatment Duration in Lenalidomide (LEN)-, Thalidomide (THAL)-, and Bortezomib (BORT)-Treated Patients (Pts) within the European Post-Approval Safety Study (EU PASS) of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4068-4068
Author(s):  
Barbara Gamberi ◽  
Charalampia Kyriakou ◽  
John Ashcroft ◽  
Miguel T. Hernandez ◽  
Jo Caers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Treatment Discontinuation ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Current Clinical Practice ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4068 Background: The efficacy and tolerability of LEN in pts with RRMM has been demonstrated in 2 large, randomized, phase 3 studies (MM-009/010). BORT and THAL have also been shown to be effective for RRMM treatment. While many studies have described the safety of antimyeloma drugs in the clinical trial setting, few have addressed the issue of tolerability in current clinical practice. Aims: In this study, we compared the incidence of adverse events (AEs) of special interest, such as neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, venous thromboembolism (VTE), peripheral neuropathy (PN) and second primary malignancies (SPM) in pts treated with LEN versus other antimyeloma therapies for RRMM in current clinical practice. Additionally, duration of treatment was assessed in the context of therapy received just prior to study entry. Methods: In this post-approval, observational, non-interventional, EU PASS study, pts with RRMM were enrolled into either the LEN cohort (LEN-based therapy) or the background cohort (all non-LEN based therapies) at the investigators' discretion. Thromboprophylaxis was per local standard practice. AEs were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Assessments for SPM were to be conducted up to 36 months (mos) after treatment discontinuation. Results: As of May 2012, overall median follow-up was 5.7 mos (range 0.02–39.8), (6.4 mos LEN, 5.7 mos THAL, 4.9 mos BORT). There were 3107 pts across 268 institutions in 17 European countries enrolled: 2141 received LEN, 751 received BORT, 110 received THAL, and 105 received other therapies or had incomplete information on the treatment arm. 127 pts from the background cohort crossed over following the physician's decision to initiate LEN treatment as a subsequent therapy. Median age was 70 years (range, 25–95) and 54% were male. Most pts (65%) had good performance status (ECOG score 0–1); 17% had an ECOG score of 2–4. Median overall number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 0–6) and this was consistent across the cohorts: 53% had 2 prior therapies and 21% had ≥3. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 1397 (45.0%) had a grade 3–4 AE. Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 14%, 4%, and 5% of pts in the LEN, BORT, and THAL groups, respectively. Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia developed in 8%, 9%, and 3% of pts, respectively. In the LEN group, only 7% of pts (1% grade 3–4) reported PN (4% newly occurring) while receiving LEN (despite 36% of pts presenting with PN at baseline) compared with 28% (5% grade 3–4) with BORT (22% PN at baseline) and 16% (2% grade 3–4) with THAL (19% PN at baseline). Grade 3–4 VTE developed in 2.7% of pts in the LEN group, 0.7% in the BORT group, and 1.8% in the THAL group. Overall treatment discontinuation rates (including disease progression) were 70%, 85%, and 86% in the LEN, BORT, and THAL groups, respectively, with nearly identical discontinuation rates due to AEs (17%) in each group, and disease progression rates of 15–20%. SPM incidence was ≤1% overall and invasive SPM incidence rate per 100 patient-years (95% CI) was 1.4 (0.94 –2.09) at a median follow-up of 10 mos and was comparable across the cohorts. Incidence of death during the study was comparable with all treatments (LEN 6%, BORT 4%, and THAL 5%); the incidence of treatment-related AEs leading to death was 1.4%, 1.2% and 0.9%, respectively. The median treatment duration was 4.6 mos in the overall population; 5.4 mos in pts treated with LEN, 3.7 mos in pts treated with BORT, and 4.6 mos in pts treated with THAL. At a 5.7 mos median follow-up, 19.9%, 2.0%, and 14.5% of pts in the LEN, BORT, and THAL arms had a treatment duration of >12 mos; and 2.2%, 0.3%, and 0.9% had a treatment duration of >24 mos, respectively. In an analysis of study treatment by last therapy prior to study entry, patients receiving THAL or BORT followed by LEN had a median on-study treatment duration of 5.7 mos and 5.2 mos, respectively, independent of the line of treatment. In comparison, pts receiving THAL or BORT followed by BORT had lower median study treatment duration of 3.7 mos and 3.8 mos, respectively. Conclusions: Results of this non-interventional, observational study show that AEs were similar with all treatments except for higher rates of neutropenia and lower rates of PN with LEN, compared with BORT or THAL. Despite the current short overall follow-up, treatment duration within the LEN, BORT, or THAL groups appears to be unaffected by prior treatment received but was longer for LEN when compared with BORT or THAL. Disclosures: Küenburg: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rosettani:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ryder-Smith:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Romiplostim for the Treatment of Adults with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) in Routine Clinical Practice in France – Interim Results From a Large Observational Study

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4643-4643
Author(s):  
Philippe Quittet ◽  
Mohamed Hamidou ◽  
Bernard Bonnotte ◽  
Olivier Fain ◽  
Kerry Dillingham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Large Observational Study ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Observation Period

Abstract Abstract 4643 Background: The thrombopoietin-receptor agonist (TPOra) romiplostim is recommended for second-line treatment of adult ITP (Provan, Blood 2010). Romiplostim registration studies were conducted in selected patient (pt) populations and may not reflect clinical practice. Moreover, regional variations may exist in the clinical utility of romiplostim. A recent French study enrolled adult ITP pts failing previous treatments and receiving romiplostim on a compassionate use basis before commercial availability (Khellaf, Blood 2011). We report interim data from French pts enrolled in a large observational study of romiplostim use in clinical practice, with broader inclusion criteria. Methods: This ongoing study enrolls ITP pts ≥18 years old, who have received romiplostim in clinical practice. Pts participating in another study, who initiated romiplostim prior to commercial launch or received other TPOra or related products are excluded. Data recorded as per clinical practice is collected for up to 2 years following romiplostim initiation. Study outcomes include pt characteristics (at romiplostim initiation), romiplostim dose, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and bleeds, summarized for pts meeting the eligibility criteria (Full Analysis Set; FAS). Amgen (Europe) GmbH funded the study and medical writing assistance. Results: As of February 2012, 86 (95%) of 91 pts enrolled in France were included in the FAS. Of these, 59% (51/86) remained on study, 31% (27/86) had completed the 2-year observation period and 9% (8/86) had withdrawn (death, 6 [7%]; lost to follow-up, 2 [2%]). At romiplostim initiation, median (Q1, Q3) age, weight and platelet count were 65.0 (48.0, 77.0) years, 74.00 (62.20, 84.00) kg and 18.0 (7.0, 31.0) × 109/L; 38% (33/86) of pts had been diagnosed with ITP for < 1 year (median [Q1, Q3] time from diagnosis, 3.04 [0.51, 13.04] years), 74% (64/86) had received ≥3 prior ITP therapies, 71% (61/86) had received prior rituximab, 30% (26/86) were splenectomised and 52% (45/86) female. Romiplostim was initiated at 1 and ≥3 μg/kg/week in 63% (54/86) and 24% (21/86) of pts; 36% (31/86) of pts stopped romiplostim before the end of the 2-year observation period, with requirement for alternative therapy (11 [13%]), haemostatic platelet count/no further treatment necessary (6 [7%]; last platelet count before romiplostim stopped, 68–616 × 109/L; 1 pt splenectomised, 4 had ITP disease duration of <1 year, all had received 3–5 prior therapies, 1 later received corticosteroids) and ADR (4 [5%]) the most commonly specified reasons. Median (Q1, Q3) romiplostim exposure was 55.1 (29.9, 100.3) weeks (maximum 106 weeks); median follow-up after romiplostim initiation was 20.40 (14.50, 24.10) months. Median (Q1, Q3) average weekly dose over the observation period was 2.6 (1.4, 4.2) μg/kg/week, and 3.02 [2.00, 5.00] and 2.00 [1.14, 3.02] μg/kg/week after 1 and 2 years of treatment (months 10–12 [n=48] and 22–24 [n=23], respectively). Median platelet counts rose rapidly during the first 4 weeks of treatment and remained >50 × 109/L thereafter (Figure). Grade ≥3 bleeds were rare and occurred at a lower rate after romiplostim initiation (Table). The most commonly reported ADRs were thrombocytosis, asthenia, myalgia and headache (9.7–3.2 events per 100 pt-years). Three pts reported a total of 6 serious ADRs: pulmonary embolism, 2 events; deep vein thrombosis, drug ineffective, myelofibrosis (initial disease diagnosis inconsistent with ITP, myelofibrosis more likely due to MDS), and thrombocytosis (platelets 477 × 109/L), 1 event each. No fatal ADRs were reported. Summary/conclusions: This study provides further insight into the clinical utility of romiplostim in France. At an interim analysis, pts tended to have less chronic disease than those enrolled in a previous observational study (Khellaf, Blood 2011). With lower doses than reported by Khellaf, and no new safety signals, pts achieved sustained increases in platelet counts and experienced a lower rate of grade ≥3 bleeds following romiplostim initiation. Disclosures: Dillingham: Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kreuzbauer:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Rationale for Therapy Discontinuation in Patients with Lower-Risk Transfusion-Dependent Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3541-3541
Author(s):  
Aaron T. Gerds ◽  
Shaloo Gupta ◽  
Gary Binder ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Aziz Nazha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Discontinuation ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Approximately 50% of patients with MDS are anemic at initial diagnosis, with many becoming transfusion dependent (TD), necessitating the introduction of therapy with a goal of achieving transfusion independence (TI). In addition to transfusions, treatments to improve hemoglobin levels have historically been limited to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), whereas patients with more advanced disease may require treatment with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) (azacitidine [AZA] or decitabine [DAC]) or lenalidomide (LEN). As there is no predetermined treatment course, these therapies are continued until unacceptable toxicity, lack/loss of response, or disease progression. We examined treatment patterns, clinical outcome(s) of patients with MDS, and the physician's report of reason for treatment discontinuation (previously shown to vary from patients' perspectives) in patients who became TD at or after MDS diagnosis (Gerds et al. Blood 2014;124:abstract 2642). Methods:Data were derived from disease-specific physician surveys and patient charts, which provided information on demographic, treatment, and outcome data on lower-risk TD MDS patients. Patient inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, diagnosis of Low/Intermediate-risk MDS (International Prognostic Scoring System defined) 2-6 years prior to study entry, and becoming TD at least once during the minimum follow-up of 24 months. TD was defined as having received ≥ 2 transfusions within 8 weeks during the follow-up period. Patients who progressed to higher-risk disease or acute myeloid leukemia prior to becoming TD, had an additional malignancy, or were in an MDS clinical trial were excluded. Demographics, disease history, treatment history, TI, and reasons for treatment discontinuation were collected and reported descriptively. Results: A total of 239 physicians provided information on 1,221 lower-risk TD MDS patients. The median age of patients was 65 years (range 27-95 years), 56.3% were male, and median time since diagnosis was 3.2 years (range 2-6 years). Along with packed red blood cell transfusions, 354 patients (29%) were prescribed LEN [of whom 12.7% had del(5q)], 348 patients (28.5%) were prescribed ESAs, and 32 patients (2.6%) were prescribed HMAs. During the follow-up period, 31.3% of ESA patients discontinued therapy (at a median of 12 months; range 3-47 months), 32% of HMA patients discontinued therapy (at a median of 10 months; range 3-52 months), and 26% of LEN patients discontinued therapy (at a median of 13 months; range 2-30 months). In the LEN-treated group, only 9.8% of patients who discontinued therapy had del(5q). The main reason cited for treatment discontinuation across therapy groups reported by physicians was "patients completing the scheduled course of treatment" (28.2%), which occurred in 32.6%, 20.2%, and 22.6% of the LEN, ESA, and HMA groups, respectively. Other reported reasons for discontinuation included "insufficient initial response" (20.0%), "patients no longer responding to therapy" (19.0%), "disease progression" (18.0%), "death" (13.3%), and "worsening hemoglobin levels" (12.8%). Across therapy groups, "patient preference to stop therapy" was reported less frequently (9.7%), occurring in 7.6%, 8.3%, and 12.9% of the LEN, ESA, and HMA groups, respectively. Conclusions:Over 30% of TD lower-risk MDS patients receiving LEN, ESAs, AZA, or DAC discontinued therapy. Per physician reports, the most frequent reason for discontinuation of therapy was completion of scheduled treatment course, which is in stark contrast to recommendations in consensus guidelines, as MDS is a chronic disease in which treatment should be continued ad infinitum. The significant number of patients who stop therapy for alternative reasons suggests opportunities for further investigation. Education on the expected duration of therapy is essential to help support physicians and inform patients about optimal treatment decisions in the care of all MDS patients. Disclosures Gupta: Kantar Health: Employment; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Binder:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Carraway:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hawthorne:Kantar Health: Employment; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. King-Concialdi:Kantar Health: Employment; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. McGuire:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Daratumumab (DARA) Maintenance Therapy Improves Depth of Response and Results in Durable Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Following Dara Plus Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (CyBorD) Induction Therapy in Multiple Myeloma (MM): Update of the Lyra Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 863-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. Rifkin ◽  
Jason M. Melear ◽  
Edward Faber ◽  
William I. Bensinger ◽  
John M Burke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Background: DARA, a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, is approved in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) and bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) for newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) and relapsed MM (RMM), respectively. CyBorD is a commonly used immunomodulatory drug-sparing regimen for MM. In the LYRA (NCT02951819) study, DARA plus CyBorD (DARA-CyBorD) demonstrated efficacy and a tolerable safety profile at the end of induction. Here, we present updated findings examining the effect of monthly DARA maintenance on the efficacy and safety of DARA-CyBorD in NDMM and RMM. Methods: LYRA is an ongoing, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study conducted at US community oncology centers. Patients (pts) were aged ≥18 years with documented MM per IMWG criteria, an ECOG performance score (PS) of 0-2, and ≤1 prior line of therapy. Pts received 4-8 induction cycles of DARA-CyBorD (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 PO on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22; bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 SC on Days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone 40 mg PO or IV weekly [qw]) every 28 days. DARA was given at 8 mg/kg IV on Days 1 and 2 of C1, 16 mg/kg qw from C1D8 through C2, 16 mg/kg q2w for C3-6, and 16 mg/kg q4w for C7-8. After induction, eligible pts could undergo autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). All pts received up to 12 maintenance cycles with DARA 16 mg/kg IV q4w. Results: A total of 101 (87 NDMM, 14 RMM) pts were enrolled; 100 (86 NDMM, 14 RMM) pts received ≥1 treatment dose. Median age was 63 years; most pts were white (81%), male (64%), had ECOG PS 0-1 (94%) and had IgG (57%) MM; 36% of pts had high cytogenetic risk, defined as a del(17p), t(4:14) or t(14;16) abnormality. NDMM and RMM pts received a median of 6 and 8 cycles, respectively, of induction therapy. Thirty-nine NDMM pts and 1 RMM pt underwent ASCT. Fifty percent of pts received plerixafor; median stem cell yield for NDMM pts was 6.2 x 106 (range 2-15 x 106) CD34+ cells/kg. A total of 85 (75 NDMM, 10 RMM) pts received ≥1 dose of maintenance treatment; 63 (56 NDMM, 7 RMM) pts have received all 12 maintenance cycles. In NDMM pts, ORR was 87%, with 64% ≥VGPR and 12% ≥CR, by the end of induction. By the end of maintenance, ORR, ≥VGPR and ≥CR rates were 97%, 82% and 51% in NDMM pts who underwent ASCT and 83%, 70% and 30% in NDMM pts who did not receive ASCT. In RMM pts, ORR, ≥VGPR and ≥CR rates were 79%, 71% and 29% by the end of induction and 86%, 71% and 64% by the end of maintenance. At a median follow up of 24.8 mo in NDMM pts and 26.6 mo in RMM pts, median duration of response was not reached (NR). Median PFS (Figure) was NR in NDMM pts, regardless of transplant status, and was 21.7 mo in RMM pts; median OS was NR in NDMM pts and was 30.1 mo in RMM pts. In NDMM pts the 24-mo PFS rate was 89% in pts who underwent ASCT and 72% in pts who did not receive ASCT. The 24-mo OS rate was 90% for NDMM pts. In RMM pts, the 24-mo PFS and OS rates were 48% and 64%, respectively. All treated pts had ≥1 TEAE. Common TEAEs (≥25%) included fatigue, nausea, cough, diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, back pain, vomiting, insomnia, dyspnea, constipation, and headache. Grade 3/4 TEAEs were reported in 62% of pts; the most common (≥10%) was neutropenia (14%). Serious TEAEs occurred in 33% of pts; the most common (&gt;2%) were pneumonia, atrial fibrillation and pulmonary embolism. TEAEs led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 7% of pts, with 2% related to treatment. TEAEs resulted in death in 2 pts (nephrotic syndrome, sudden death); both unrelated to treatment. Infusion reactions (IRs) occurred in 56% of pts including grades 1-2 in 52% of pts, grade 3 in 3% of pts and grade 4 in 1% of pts. Most common (&gt;5%) IRs were chills, cough, dyspnea, nausea, pruritus, flushing and nasal congestion. Conclusion: Maintenance with DARA monotherapy for 12 mo increased the &gt;CR rate in NDMM and RMM pts, consistent with observations in prior studies that longer DARA treatment improves depth of response. Importantly, the increase in ≥CR rate was associated with durable PFS and OS. The 24-mo PFS rates in NDMM and RMM pts compare favorably with results for DARA-VMP and DARA-Vd in NDMM and RRMM, respectively. Safety profile was consistent with previous reports of DARA, with no new safety concerns observed with longer follow-up. These data indicate that DARA-CyBorD is a safe, effective MM treatment and that DARA maintenance increases depth of response and achieves durable remissions. Disclosures Rifkin: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Melear:Texas Oncology: Employment; DARA: Speakers Bureau. Faber:Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bensinger:Amgen, Celgene: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda, Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Merck, Karyopharm: Other: Grant. Burke:Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Narang:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Stevens:Astellas: Consultancy. Gunawardena:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lutska:Janssen: Employment. Qi:Janssen: Employment. Ukropec:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Qi:Janssen: Employment. Lin:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yimer:Amgen: Consultancy; Clovis Oncology: Equity Ownership; Puma Biotechnology: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau.

Durable Responses with the JAK1/ JAK2 Inhibitor, INCB018424, In Patients with Polycythemia Vera (PV) and Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) Refractory or Intolerant to Hydroxyurea (HU)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 313-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Francesco Passamonti ◽  
Alessandro Rambaldi ◽  
Giovanni Barosi ◽  
Peter J. Rosen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Duration ◽  
The United States ◽  
Study Medication ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Allele Burden ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Upper Limit ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 313 Background: While advanced PV and ET patients at high thrombotic risk are managed primarily with HU, patients who are intolerant or refractory to HU have limited therapeutic options. Identification of a dominant gain-of-function mutation in the JAK2 kinase, V617F, in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including PV and ET, provided a key rationale for the development of a molecularly targeted therapy for these diseases. Long term follow-up data from an ongoing trial of INCB018424, a selective JAK 1/ JAK 2 inhibitor, in PV and ET patients refractory or intolerant to HU are presented. Methods: Study 18424-256 is an uncontrolled open-label Phase 2 study being conducted at 6 sites in the United States and Italy. An initial 8-week run-in evaluation established 10-mg and 25-mg twice daily as starting doses for expansion cohorts in PV and ET, respectively; dose adjustments for safety and efficacy are allowed so that each subject is titrated to their most appropriate dose. For PV, response is defined based on Hct control in the absence of phlebotomy, improvement or elimination of palpable splenomegaly when present, and normalization of leukocytosis and thrombocytosis. For ET, response is defined based on improvement or normalization of WBC and platelet counts and, when present, elimination of palpable splenomegaly. PV results (n=34; median 108 months from diagnosis): After a median follow-up of 15 months (range 8–21), 97% of enrolled subjects achieved Hct control to <45% in the absence of phlebotomy, and all continued to maintain phlebotomy-independence at the time of last follow-up visit. Splenomegaly was present in 74% of subjects at entry: 59% of those achieved ≥ 50% reduction in palpable spleen length, or the spleen became non-palpable with all maintaining spleen response at the time of the last follow-up visit. Leukocytosis > 15×109/L was present in 47% of subjects and improved (≤ 15×109/L) or normalized (≤ upper limit of normal) in 88% and 63%, respectively. Thrombocytosis > 600×109/L was present in 38% of subjects and improved (≤ 600×109/L) or normalized (≤ upper limit of normal) in 92% and 69%, respectively. 59% of subjects achieved phlebotomy independence, resolution of splenomegaly and normalization of leukocytosis and thrombocytosis. 6 patients discontinued therapy (3 due to AEs, 2 withdrew consent, 1 for no response). Grade 3 AEs potentially related to study medication included thrombocytopenia (2 patients), neutropenia (1), renal tumor (1), asthenia (1), viral infection (1), and atrial flutter (1). No Grade 4 drug-related AEs have occurred. ET results (n=39; median 84 months from diagnosis): After a median follow-up of 15 months (range 4–21), 49% of enrolled subjects normalized platelet counts to ≤ upper limit of normal after a median of 0.5 months and for a median duration of 3.5 months. 82% maintained platelet counts < 600×109/L, for a median duration of 9.8 months. Of 14 patients with baseline platelet counts > 1000×109/L, 13 have experienced > 50% reduction. 88% maintained normal WBC (median duration 14.5 months). Palpable spleens resolved in 3 of 4 subjects; 1 reduced >50% from baseline. 49% of subjects achieved normalization of WBC and platelet counts in the presence of non-palpable splenomegaly. 9 patients discontinued therapy (4 due to AEs, 2 withdrew consent, 3 for no response). Grade 3 AEs potentially related to study medication included leukopenia (2 patients), GI disorder (1), and peripheral neuropathy (1). No Grade 4 drug-related AEs have occurred. Both patient groups demonstrated reductions in patient-reported symptom scores for pruritus, night sweats, and bone pain. Of 26 PV patients reporting pruritus at baseline (median score of 6 on a 10-point scale), 24 reported scores of 0 after a median duration of 1 month and for a median duration of 7 months. 42% of PV and 56% of ET patients had at least a 20% decrease in JAK2V617F allele burden; 6% of PV and 12% of ET had >50% decrease. Clinical responses were unrelated to the presence/absence of JAK2V617F mutation at entry or to the allele burden changes following treatment. Conclusions: Rapid and durable clinical benefits (normalization of hematological parameters, resolution of splenomegaly and alleviation of symptoms) have been demonstrated in advanced PV and ET patients with >1 year of follow-up. In this study, INCB018424 continues to be a well tolerated, effective therapy in patients with PV and ET refractory or intolerant to hydroxyurea. Disclosures: Verstovsek: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Levy:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bradley:Incyte Corporation: Employment. Garrett:Incyte Corporation: Employment. Vaddi:Incyte corporation: Employment. Huber:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Schacter:Pfizer Corporation: Employment. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Survival Findings From Comfort-II, a Phase 3 Study Comparing Ruxolitinib with Best Available Therapy (BAT) for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 801-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Cervantes ◽  
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽  
Dietger Niederwieser ◽  
Andres Sirulnik ◽  
Viktoriya Stalbovskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Extension Phase ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 801 Background: Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1 & 2 inhibitor that has demonstrated superiority over traditional therapies for the treatment of MF. In the two phase 3 COMFORT studies, ruxolitinib demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life. COMFORT-II is a randomized, open-label study evaluating ruxolitinib versus BAT in patients (pts) with MF. The primary and key secondary endpoints were both met: the proportion of pts achieving a response (defined as a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume) at wk 48 (ruxolitinib, 28.5%; BAT, 0%; P < .0001) and 24 (31.9% and 0%; P < .0001), respectively. The present analyses update the efficacy and safety findings of COMFORT-II (median follow-up, 112 wk). Methods: In COMFORT-II, 219 pts with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF and splenomegaly were randomized (2:1) to receive ruxolitinib (15 or 20 mg bid, based on baseline platelet count [100-200 × 109/L or > 200 × 109/L, respectively]) or BAT. Efficacy results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis; a loss of spleen response was defined as a > 25% increase in spleen volume over on-study nadir that is no longer a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median follow-up was 112 wk (ruxolitinib, 113; BAT, 108), and the median duration of exposure 83.3 wk (ruxolitinib, 111.4 [randomized and extension phases]; BAT, 45.1 [randomized treatment only]). Because the core study has completed, all pts have either entered the extension phase or discontinued from the study. The primary reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; ruxolitinib, 11.6%; BAT, 6.8%), consent withdrawal (4.1% and 12.3%), and disease progression (2.7% and 5.5%). Overall, 72.6% of pts (106/146) in the ruxolitinib arm and 61.6% (45/73) in the BAT arm entered the extension phase to receive ruxolitinib, and 55.5% (81/146) of those originally randomized to ruxolitinib remained on treatment at the time of this analysis. The primary reasons for discontinuation from the extension phase were progressive disease (8.2%), AEs (2.1%), and other (4.1%). Overall, 70 pts (48.3%) treated with ruxolitinib achieved a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at any time during the study, and 97.1% of pts (132/136) with postbaseline assessments experienced a clinical benefit with some degree of reduction in spleen volume. Spleen reductions of ≥ 35% were sustained with continued ruxolitinib therapy (median duration not yet reached); the probabilities of maintaining the spleen response at wk 48 and 84 are 75% (95% CI, 61%-84%) and 58% (95% CI, 35%-76%), respectively (Figure). Since the last report (median 61.1 wk), an additional 9 and 12 deaths were reported in the ruxolitinib and BAT arms, respectively, resulting in a total of 20 (14%) and 16 (22%) deaths overall. Although there was no inferential statistical testing at this unplanned analysis, pts randomized to ruxolitinib showed longer survival than those randomized to BAT (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27–1.00). As expected, given the mechanism of action of ruxolitinib as a JAK1 & 2 inhibitor, the most common new or worsened grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities during randomized treatment were anemia (ruxolitinib, 40.4%; BAT, 23.3%), lymphopenia (22.6%; 31.5%), and thrombocytopenia (9.6%; 9.6%). In the ruxolitinib arm, mean hemoglobin levels decreased over the first 12 wk of treatment and then recovered to levels similar to BAT from wk 24 onward; there was no difference in the mean monthly red blood cell transfusion rate among the ruxolitinib and BAT groups (0.834 vs 0.956 units, respectively). Nonhematologic AEs were primarily grade 1/2. Including the extension phase, there were no new nonhematologic AEs in the ruxolitinib group that were not observed previously (in ≥ 10% of pts), and only 1 pt had a new grade 3/4 AE (epistaxis). Conclusion: In COMFORT-II, ruxolitinib provided rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly; this analysis demonstrates that these reductions are sustained over 2 years of treatment in the majority of pts. Ruxolitinib-treated pts showed longer survival than those receiving BAT, consistent with the survival advantage observed in previous (Verstovsek et al. NEJM. 2012) and current analyses of COMFORT-I, as well as with the comparison of pts of the phase 1/2 study with matched historical controls (Verstovsek et al. Blood. 2012). Disclosures: Cervantes: Sanofi-Aventis: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Celgene: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Pfizer: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: AdvisoryBoard Other, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Sirulnik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stalbovskaya:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. McQuity:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hunter:Incyte: Employment. Levy:Incyte: Employment, stock options Other. Passamonti:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barbui:Novartis: Honoraria. Gisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharma AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Knoops:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harrison:Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Is Adherence to the American College of Chest Physicians Recommended Anticoagulation Treatment Duration Associated with Different Outcomes Among Patients with Venous Thromboembolism?

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1126-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽  
Ron Preblick ◽  
Jackie Kwong ◽  
Melissa Lingohr-Smith ◽  
Jay Lin
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Minimum Duration ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major clinical and economic burden. The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Guideline 9th Edition on the treatment of VTE recommends a minimum duration of anticoagulation (AC) therapy depending on patient risk profiles. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes associated with adherence to the AC treatment duration recommendation among VTE patients in the real world setting. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with at least 1 inpatient diagnosis or 2 outpatient diagnoses on two different dates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), based on ICD-9-CM codes, were identified from the IMS Pharmetrics Plus database during 1/1/2009 through 3/31/2013. The first VTE diagnosis was defined as the index event. Study patients were required to have continuous insurance coverage during the 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the index event and no prior VTE diagnosis in the baseline period. They were also required to have received at least one outpatient anticoagulant treatment within 30 days of the initial VTE diagnosis with a minimum medication days of supply of 30 days. ACCP recommend that patients with provoked VTE or unprovoked VTE and high bleeding risks receive AC treatment for at least 3 months and that patients with unprovoked VTE and low or moderate bleeding risks or patients with cancer receive AC treatment for at least 6 months. Patient records in the database including ICD-9-CM codes and RIETE bleeding risk scores were used to group patients into 2 cohorts, one comprised of patients who received AC treatment for a duration as recommended by the ACCP (adherent group, AD) and the other comprised of patients who received AC treatment for a duration less than that recommended by the ACCP (non-adherent group, non-AD). Patient demographics and clinical characteristic were evaluated during the baseline period. Healthcare resource utilization, including hospital admissions, outpatient medical services, and prescription drug usage, were measured during the baseline and follow-up periods. VTE recurrence, defined as hospitalization or ER visit with a VTE diagnosis code, was also measured during the follow-up period. Multivariate regression analysis was utilized to compare clinical and economic outcomes of study cohorts while controlling for key patient characteristics. Results: The study population included 81,827 patients with a mean age (standard deviation) of 55.3 (13.8) years. For the index VTE event, 61% had DVT only, 26% had PE only, and 13% had DVT/PE. Of the study population, the minimum ACCP recommended AC treatment durations were 3 and 6 months for 27% (n=22,157) and 73% (n=59,670) of patients, respectively. Among all patients, 74% (n=60,550) received AC therapy for the ACCP recommended duration. The proportion of patients with VTE risks, including recent hospitalization (17% vs. 9%, p<0.001), recent surgery (9% vs. 6%, p<0.001), index diagnosis of PE only (28% vs. 20%, p<0.001), and index diagnosis of DVT/PE (15% vs. 8%, p<0.001) was greater in the AD cohort than in the non-AD cohort. Furthermore, mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score (1.67 vs. 1.59, p<0.001) and RIETE bleeding risk score (RIETE ≥1: 66% vs. 55%, p<0.001) were higher for the AD cohort compared to the non-AD cohort. The most prevalent anticoagulants used for treatment were warfarin (89% vs. 96%, p<0.001) and low molecular weight heparin (58% vs. 59%, p<0.01). After controlling for key patient characteristics, risks for all-cause hospitalization (Odds ratio (OR): 0.80, confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.83, p<0.001) and VTE recurrence (OR=0.91, CI: 0.86-0.95, p<0.001) were lower among VTE patients in the AD cohort vs. the non-AD cohort, as were differences in all-cause total healthcare payments (-$3,416, p<0.001) and VTE-related healthcare payments (-$2,139, p<0.001) during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Approximately a quarter of the study population with VTE did not receive treatment with AC therapy for the minimum duration as recommended by the ACCP guideline. Patients who did not receive outpatient AC therapy for the recommended duration had more VTE recurrences, utilized more inpatient services, and had higher healthcare costs than patients who received AC therapy for the ACCP recommended duration. Disclosures Spyropoulos: Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Consultancy. Preblick:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kwong:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lingohr-Smith:Chimerix, Inc.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc: Consultancy; Novosys Health: Employment. Lin:Chimerix, Inc.: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novosys Health: Employment.

Complete Molecular and Hematologic Response in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive B-Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Following Treatment with Blinatumomab: Results from a Phase 2 Single-Arm, Multicenter Study (ALCANTARA)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 679-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Hervé Dombret ◽  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
Oliver G. Ottmann ◽  
Nicola Goekbuget ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
T315i Mutation ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction. Prognosis of patients (pts) with R/R Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL is dismal despite the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) which may be used as single agents or in combination regimens. Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engaging (BiTE®) antibody construct that has shown antileukemic activity. Among adults with R/R Ph-negative ALL receiving blinatumomab, 43% achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) during the first two cycles (Topp MS et al. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:57). We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of blinatumomab in pts with R/R Ph+ ALL who progressed after or were intolerant to a 2nd or later (2+) generation TKI. Methods. Eligible adult pts (≥18 years) had Ph+ B-precursor ALL and had relapsed after or were refractory to at least one 2+ generation TKI; or were intolerant to 2+ generation TKI and intolerant or refractory to imatinib. All pts had to have >5% blasts in the bone marrow and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2. Blinatumomab was dosed by continuous IV infusion (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) for up to 5 cycles (9 μg/d on days 1-7 in cycle 1, and 28 μg/d thereafter). The primary endpoint was CR or CRh during the first two cycles; minimal residual disease (MRD) response based on RT-PCR amplification of BCR-ABL per central laboratory, relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) rate were key secondary endpoints. Complete MRD response was defined as no RT-PCR amplification of BCR-ABL at a sensitivity of 10-5. Results. Of 45 treated pts, 44 were resistant to 2+ generation TKI; one patient was resistant to imatinib and never exposed to 2+ generation TKI (protocol deviation). 53% of pts were men. Median (range) age was 55 (23-78) years (≥65 years, 27%). Ten pts (22%) had a BCR-ABL gene with T315I mutation. All pts had received prior TKI (dasatinib, 87%; ponatinib, 51%; imatinib, 56%; nilotinib, 36%; bosutinib, 2%), with 60% having received ≥ 2 prior 2+ generation TKI; most pts (96%) had received prior chemotherapy. 38% of pts had ≥ 2 prior relapses and 44% had prior alloHSCT. Efficacy outcomes for key endpoints are shown in the table. 16 pts achieved CR/CRh during the first two cycles for a response rate of 36% (95% CI: 22%, 51%); of those, 14 pts achieved CR, most of them (10/14, 71%) in cycle 1. The patient who never received 2+ generation TKI did not respond to treatment. 12 of the 14 pts (86%) with CR and two of the two pts with CRh achieved a complete MRD response. Among the 10 pts with T315I mutation, four achieved CR/CRh; all four also achieved a complete MRD response. Eight CR/CRh responders (50%) relapsed, three during treatment (including two with CR who did not achieve complete MRD response). One patient died in CR post alloHSCT. Median (95% CI) RFS was 6.7 (4.4, not estimable) months (median follow-up, 9.0 months); median OS was 7.1 (5.6, not estimable) months (median follow-up, 8.8 months). Patient incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) was 82%, most commonly febrile neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (22%), anemia (16%), and pyrexia (11%). Five pts had fatal AEs; one (septic shock) was considered treatment-related by the investigator. Three pts discontinued because of AEs. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in three pts (all grade 1 or 2). 21 pts (47%) had neurologic events (paraesthesia, 13%; confusional state, 11%; dizziness, 9%; tremor, 9%); three pts had grade 3 neurologic events (aphasia, hemiplegia; and depressed level of consciousness and nervous system disorder), one of which (aphasia) required treatment interruption. Conclusion. In this population of pts with R/R Ph+ ALL who have very poor prognosis after failure of 2+ generation TKI therapy, treatment with CD19-targeted immunotherapy blinatumomab as single agent showed antileukemic activity. AEs were consistent with those previously reported for pts with R/R Ph-negative ALL treated with blinatumomab. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures Martinelli: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; MSD: Consultancy. Dombret:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ottmann:Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Goekbuget:Bayer: Equity Ownership; Eusapharma/Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Erytech: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SigmaTau: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy; Sanofi: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Topp:Astra: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel Support; Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Fielding:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sterling:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Benjamin:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stein:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.

Romiplostim in Thrombocytopenic Patients with Low- or Int-1- Risk MDS Results in Reduced Bleeding without Impacting Leukemic Progression: Final Follow-up Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2000-2000
Author(s):  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽  
Jeffrey Szer ◽  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Thrombocytopenia occurs in ~50% of patients with low/int-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and is associated with reduced survival. In a placebo (PBO)-controlled study, 250 patients with MDS were randomized 2:1 to receive weekly romiplostim or PBO. In the original June 2011 analysis, romiplostim reduced clinically significant bleeding events [hazard ratio (HR) romiplostim vs PBO 0.83, 95% CI: 0.66−1.05, P = 0.13] and platelet transfusions (relative risk 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66−0.88, P<0.001) and increased IWG hematologic improvement platelets (HI-P) incidence (odds ratio 15.6, 95% CI: 4.7−51.8, P<0.001). Peripheral blast count increases >10% were more frequent with romiplostim (25/167, 15%) than PBO (3/83, 3.6%) and resolved after discontinuation in most cases. In February 2011, the DMC recommended that treatment with study drug be discontinued as the potential benefit seen in the reduction of bleeding did not outweigh the potential risk for disease progression to AML, and that transient increases in blast cell counts might put patients at risk for diagnosis of and treatment for AML. Patients were moved into long-term follow-up (LTFU). Previously reported (Giagounidis et al, Cancer 2014) 58-week incidence of AML was 6.0% (N = 10) for romiplostim and 4.9% for PBO (N = 4); HR 1.20 (95% CI: 0.38−3.84). This report provides final 5-year LTFU data. Methods: Eligible patients were receiving only supportive care and had IPSS low/int-1 risk MDS and platelets 1) ≤20 × 109/L or 2) ≤50 × 109/L with a history of bleeding. Disease progression to AML was defined as 1) ≥20% blasts in bone marrow or peripheral blood after 4 weeks following discontinuation of romiplostim; 2) pathology consistent with leukemia; or 3) antileukemic treatment. Results are presented by treatment group. Results: At baseline, median (Q1, Q3) age was 70 (61, 77) years, the majority (59%) of patients were male; 27.6% were IPSS low risk and 72.4% were int-1 risk. WHO classifications were RCMD: 67.6%, RAEB-1: 13.2%, MDS-U: 11.2%, RA: 4.4%, RCMD-RS: 2.4%, RARS: 0.8%, and RAEB-2: 0.4%. Of 250 patients in the study, 210 entered LTFU and 66 completed the 5 years of LTFU; median (Q1, Q3) follow-up was 27.5 (10.8, 58.7) months. Reasons for discontinuation (death, lost to follow-up, and consent withdrawal) during LTFU were similar in both groups. During the active study period and LTFU, death was reported in 93 (55.7%) patients in the romiplostim group and 45 (54.2%) patients in the PBO group (HR romiplostim vs PBO 1.03, 95% CI: 0.72−1.47) (Figure); mortality rates were greater in those with IPSS int-1 vs low risk for both groups (Table). AML was reported in 20 (11.9%) patients in the romiplostim group and 9 (11.0%) patients in the PBO group (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.48−2.33). The proportions of patients who either died or developed AML were 56.9% (N = 95) in the romiplostim group and 55.4% (N = 46) in the PBO group (HR for AML-free survival 1.04, 95% CI: 0.73−1.48) (Figure). Nearly half (N = 14, 48%) of the 29 AML cases occurred in patients who were RAEB-1 at screening (none RAEB-2), and 6 cases were diagnosed because of anti-AML treatment use alone (Table). In LTFU, patient-reported use of MDS therapy (eg, azacitidine or cyclosporine) was 42.8% (N = 59, 95% CI: 34.4%−51.5%) in the romiplostim group and 31.4% (N = 22, 95% CI: 20.9%−43.6%) in the PBO group. AML therapy (eg, chemotherapy) was used in 14 (10.2%) patients in the romiplostim group and 7 (10.0%) patients in the PBO group. Conclusions: Following the decision in 2011 to stop study drug secondary to increased AML rates at that time and transient blasts increases, final 5-year LTFU HRs (romiplostim vs placebo) for death or progression to AML, respectively, are 1.03 (95% CI: 0.72−1.47) and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.48−2.33). In conclusion, romiplostim reduced bleeding events and platelet transfusions, with no increase in AML incidence or impact on survival. Disclosures Kantarjian: Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Fenaux:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Szer:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Australia: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Platzbecker:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kuendgen:Celgene: Research Funding. Gaidano:Morphosys: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wiktor-Jedrzejczak:Angelini: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Carpenter:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mehta:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Franklin:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Giagounidis:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Mature Follow up from a Phase 2 Study of PI3K-Delta Inhibitor Idelalisib in Patients with Double (Rituximab and Alkylating agent)-Refractory Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1708-1708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
Sven de Vos ◽  
Nina D. Wagner-Johnston ◽  
Stephen J. Schuster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Systemic Therapies

Abstract Introduction: Rituximab-alkylator combinations are the standard therapies for patients (pts) with iNHL, however, refractory disease nearly uniformly develops. Once iNHL becomes “double-refractory” to both rituximab + alkylating agents, there are limited options to induce durable remissions. PI3K-delta signaling is critical for activation, proliferation and survival of B cells, and is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib, a selective oral inhibitor of PI3Kd, demonstrated considerable clinical activity in double-refractory iNHL (Gopal NEJM 2014). FDA granted accelerated approval for Idelalisib (Zydelig®) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies with relapsed FL or SLL. Based on these encouraging initial results, we now describe long-term follow up, safety, and remission durations of this double-refractory iNHL population treated with idelalisib. Methods: Eligible iNHL pts included those with measurable disease refractory to both rituximab and an alkylating agent. Refractory was defined as lack of response to, or progression of lymphoma within 6 months of completion of index therapy, confirmed by imaging. Idelalisib 150 mg PO BID was administered continuously until disease progression or intolerance. Responses were evaluated by an independent review committee, using standard criteria (Cheson, 2007, and Owen 2013). The new data cutoff date for this analysis was June 2014, 20 months after the last patient enrolled. Results: Enrolled pts (N = 125) had a median age of 64 years and included follicular lymphoma (FL) n=72 (58%), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) n=28 (22%), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) n=15 (12%) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL)/Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) n=10 (8%). The median number of prior therapies was 4 [range 2-12], including bendamustine/rituximab (BR) (n=60) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) (n=56) and autologous transplant (n=14). 81 pts (65%) had prior bendamustine, of which 61/81 (75%) were refractory. 112 pts (90%) were refractory to their last regimen, and 99 pts (79%) were refractory to ≥2 regimens. 38 pts (30%) had elevated LDH, and 33 pts (26%) had bulky disease >7 cm. The median time to progression from last prior therapy was 3.9 months. With a median exposure of 11.1 months (range 0.7 to 35.4), the overall response rate (ORR) is 56% (95% CI = 46.8-64.9) with 70 responders, comprising 12 CRs (9.6%), 58 PRs (46.4%). The median time to response was 1.9 months (time of first evaluation) and time to CR was 4.5 months. There were 43 pts with stable disease (SD) (34.4%). 90% of pts experienced some decrease in tumor burden. ORR for iNHL subtypes is: FL (54%), SLL (61%), MZL (47%), and LPL/WM (70%). CR rate for iNHL subtypes is: FL (14%), SLL (4%), MZL (7%), and LPL/WM (0%). Among responders, median DOR is 13.9 (0.03-31.3) months. DOR for iNHL subtypes in months (Figure 1) is: FL 11.8, SLL 13.9, MZL 18.4, and LPL/WM (not yet reached). Median PFS for all pts is 11.0 months, in comparison to a median PFS of the last prior regimen of 3.9 months (p<.0001). The median PFS for individual subtypes in months was: FL 11.0, SLL11.1, MZL 6.6, and LPL/WM 22.2. The median overall survival of all patients was 30.8 months. The adverse events include (total%/≥ grade 3%) diarrhea/colitis (50/18), fatigue (30/2), nausea (31/2), cough (32/0), pyrexia (30/2), dyspnea (18/5), rash (14/2), pneumonia (14/11), and pneumonitis (4/3). Based on central laboratory measurements, Grade ≥3 ALT/AST elevations occurred in 18 pts (14%). Drug was temporarily held in these pts, and 11/15 pts (73%) were re-treated without recurrence of ALT/AST elevation. Overall, 30 pts (24%) have discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Conclusions: The prolonged administration of idelalisib was well tolerated, had an acceptable safety profile, and was highly effective in inducing and maintaining remissions in double-refractory iNHL population with an ORR of 56%, PFS of 11 months, and DOR of 13.9 months. The response rate and long term duration of responses in the small number of subjects with LPL/WM is very promising, and will be evaluated in larger trials of this disease. The observed disease control compared to prior regimens suggests the potential for prolonged clinical benefit in this challenging patient population with unmet medical need. Figure 1: Duration of Response by Disease Group. Figure 1:. Duration of Response by Disease Group. Disclosures Gopal: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Zydelig is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with: 1) Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities; 2) Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (FL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies; and 3) Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.. Kahl:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. de Vos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Schuster:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Jurczak:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flowers:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Martin:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Viardot:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Blum:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Goy:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Davies:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Zinzani:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Dreyling:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Holes:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sorensen:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Godfrey:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Salles:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Interim Analysis of a Phase 1 Study of the Antibody-Drug Conjugate SGN-CD19A in Relapsed or Refractory B-Lineage Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1741-1741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig H. Moskowitz ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Bijal D. Shah ◽  
Ranjana Advani ◽  
Paul Hamlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background CD19, a B-cell specific marker, is expressed in the majority of patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). SGN-CD19A is a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF) via a maleimidocaproyl linker. Methods This ongoing phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study investigates the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of SGN-CD19A in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell NHL (NCT 01786135). Eligible patients are ≥12 years of age and must have a confirmed diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including transformed follicular histology; mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); follicular lymphoma grade 3 (FL3); Burkitt lymphoma; or B-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Patients must be relapsed or refractory to at least 1 prior systemic regimen. Patients with DLBCL or FL3 must have also received intensive salvage therapy with or without autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), unless they refused or were deemed ineligible. A modified continual reassessment method is used for dose allocation and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) estimation. SGN-CD19A is administered IV on Day 1 of 21-day cycles (0.5–6 mg/kg). Response is assessed with CT and PET scans according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results To date, 44 patients have been treated: 39 patients (89%) with DLBCL (including 10 with transformed DLBCL), 4 (9%) with MCL, and 1 (2%) with FL3. Median age was 65 years (range, 33–81). Patients had a median of 2 prior systemic therapies (range, 1–7), and 10 patients (23%) had autologous SCT. Twenty-six patients (59%) were refractory to their most recent prior therapy, and 18 (41%) were relapsed. Patients received a median of 3 cycles of treatment (range, 1–12) at doses from 0.5–6 mg/kg. Eleven patients (25%) remain on treatment, and 33 have discontinued treatment (18 due to progressive disease [PD], 5 for investigator decision, 5 for adverse events [AE], 4 because of patient decision/non-AE, and 1 for SCT). No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in Cycle 1 has been reported. Treatment-emergent AEs reported in ≥20% of patients were blurred vision (59%), dry eye (39%), fatigue (39%), constipation (32%), keratopathy (23%), and pyrexia (20%). Corneal exam findings consistent with superficial microcystic keratopathy were observed in 25 patients (57%) and were mostly Grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 corneal AEs were observed in 4 patients at the higher doses; the majority resolved or improved to Grade 1/2 at last follow-up. Corneal AEs were treated with ophthalmic steroids, and during the trial steroid eye drop prophylaxis was instituted with each dose of study drug. SGN-CD19A ADC plasma exposures were approximately dose-proportional. Accumulation was observed following multiple dose administrations, consistent with a mean terminal half-life of about 2 weeks, suggesting less frequent dosing might be possible. In the 43 efficacy-evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) is 30% (95% CI [17, 46]), including 7 complete responses (CRs; 16%) and 6 partial responses (PRs; 14%). Of the 13 patients with an objective response, 8 are still on study with follow-up times of 0.1–31 weeks; 2 are no longer on study; and 3 had subsequent PD or death with response durations of 14, 19, and 31 weeks. Table Best Clinical Response by Disease Status Relative to Most Recent Therapy, n (%) Relapsed N=17 Refractory N=26 Total N=43 CR 5 (29) 2 (8) 7 (16) PR 4 (24) 2 (8) 6(14) SD 4 (24) 9 (35) 13 (30) PD 4 (24) 13 (50) 17 (40) ORR (CR + PR), (95% CI) 53 (28, 77) 15 (4, 35) 30 (17, 46) Conclusions To date, SGN-CD19A has shown evidence of clinical activity with an ORR of 30% and CR rate of 16%. Enrollment in the trial is ongoing to further refine optimal dose and schedule. SGN-CD19A is generally well-tolerated. No DLTs have been observed in tested dose levels. Observed ocular AEs are manageable with steroid eye drops and dose modifications. The high response rate (53%) in relapsed patients and low rate of bone marrow suppression or neuropathy suggest that SGN-CD19A could be incorporated into novel combination regimens in earlier lines of therapy. Disclosures Moskowitz: Merck: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: SGN-CD19A is an investigational agent being studied in patients with B-cell malignancies. SGN-CD19A is not approved for use. . Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Shah:Pharmacyclics: Speakers Bureau; SWOG: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; NCCN: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Advani:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda International Pharmaceuticals Co.: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Travel expenses Other. Hamlin:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:Bayer: Consultancy; Eli Lily: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kostic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sandalic:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhao:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel expenses Other.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document