The Average Baseline BCR-ABL Levels Are Significantly Higher in Patients with Resistance to Dasatinib As First-Line Treatment for Early Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4436-4436
Author(s):  
Cristian Tomasetti ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Ritesh Ramchandani ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Alfonso Quintás-Cardama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
First Line ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Abstract 4436 Background: The development of drug resistance remains a problem for some chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients treated with tyrosine kinase. Point mutations are the main mechanism behind drug resistance, and they can occur prior to therapy. Thus, there may be a positive correlation between the baseline BCR-ABL levels and the occurrence of drug resistance. Methods: We define a “relapse/no-response” as a BCR-ABL/ABL transcript ratio of >10% (international scale) at 6 months or later during continuous dasatinib treatment. Statistical analysis is performed an all early chronic phase CML treated with dasatinib as first-line therapy (n=102) in a prospective clinical trial at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The probability of having drug resistant leukemic cells already present at diagnosis is also estimated. Results: Seven of the 90 (7.8%) evaluable patients had a “relapse/no-response”. The mean (median) BCR-ABL/ABL transcript ratio at baseline for the “relapse/no-response” group was 23.3% (20.7%), while for the rest of the patients was 14.1% (9.9%), a statistically significant difference. The incidence rates of “relapse/no-response” for patients with a BCR-ABL/ABL transcript ratio at baseline equal to or larger than 20% was 13.8%, versus 7.8% overall for the entire dataset. Our estimates suggest that if the therapy were to be started on average one month earlier, the probability of a “relapse/no-response” would decrease from 7.8% to 6.9%. Conclusions: The BCR-ABL transcript levels at baseline are significantly higher for those patients later incurring in a “relapse/no-response”. Moreover, our estimates suggest that starting the treatment as soon as possible after diagnosis may be critical for reducing the number of patients developing drug resistance. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Jabbour:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Baseline Characteristics Of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia In a Prospective Observational Study (SIMPLICITY)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4026-4026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Rüdiger Hehlmann ◽  
Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini ◽  
Stuart Goldberg ◽  
H. Jean Khoury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
First Line ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Prospective Cohorts

Abstract Background Oral BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including imatinib (IM), dasatinib (DAS) and nilotinib (NIL), have improved survival in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML). Few data are available that compare TKIs in daily clinical practice across multiple regions. Methods SIMPLICITY is an ongoing observational cohort study of adult patients with newly diagnosed CP-CML receiving first-line treatment with IM, DAS or NIL in the USA and Europe (Eu) outside of clinical trials (NCT01244750). The primary objective is to assess effectiveness of these TKIs in clinical practice. The study includes three ‘prospective’ cohorts of patients treated with IM, DAS or NIL since 2010 (the study opened after first-line approval of all three TKIs) and a ‘historical’ cohort treated with IM since 2008. Preliminary baseline demographics are presented for prospective cohorts. Results 860 prospective patients (Eu: 32%, USA: 68%) were enrolled through June 20, 2013, receiving IM (n=399), DAS (n=229) or NIL (n=232). Median age at initiation of first-line TKI was 56 years, with significant differences in pairwise comparisons between DAS and IM and NIL and IM (Table). Demographics were consistent across cohorts. Only 30% of patients had Hasford or Sokal scores recorded. ECOG performance status (PS) was available in 54% of patients. The number of baseline comorbidities per patient (mean: 3.2 + 2.7) was balanced across cohorts; 51% of patients presented with ≥3 comorbidities. Patients in the IM cohort had a higher prevalence of gastrointestinal comorbidities (P=.006 and .007 for DAS vs IM and NIL vs IM, respectively), and the NIL cohort had a higher prevalence of musculoskeletal comorbidities than the DAS cohort (P=.015). The proportions of patients with cardiovascular comorbidities were 38%, 36% and 42% in the DAS, NIL and IM cohorts, respectively, consisting primarily of hypertension (31%) and hyperlipidemia (17%) (P>.05 across cohorts). Coronary artery disease was present in 9%, cardiac arrhythmias in 6%, myocardial infarction in 3% and peripheral arterial disease in 2% of patients. The proportion of patients with diabetes was 10%. Clinicians reported effectiveness as the most common reason for TKI selection; familiarity and cost were also cited as reasons for IM selection (P<.001 vs DAS and NIL). Comorbidities were not drivers of TKI selection in this analysis. Conclusions This is the first report from the prospective cohorts of SIMPLICITY. Demographics were consistent across cohorts. Overall, the SIMPLICITY population is older with potentially more comorbidities than patients enrolled in first-line clinical trials with restrictive inclusion criteria (NEJM 2003 348 994; NEJM 2010 362 2260; NEJM 2010 362 2251). Initial TKI selection does not appear to be driven by baseline comorbidity, rather by perceived effectiveness, cost and familiarity. Hasford/Sokal scores were not recorded in the majority of patients prior to starting first-line TKI therapy. Outcomes data are being collected across cohorts that will inform about a multi-region population treated outside clinical trials. Disclosures: Cortes: Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Hehlmann:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gambacorti-Passerini:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldberg:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Oncology: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Khoury:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria. Mauro:Novartis Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Michallet:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Paquette:Ariad: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy. Foreman:ICON Clinical Research: Employment, My employer ICON Clinical Research receives research funding from pharmaceutical companies including manufacturers of CML drugs Other. Mohamed:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Zyczynski:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Hirji:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Davis:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment.

scholarly journals Clinical Relevance of Failure to Achieve Early Molecular Response in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5160-5160
Author(s):  
Ji Yun Lee ◽  
Sung Hee Lim ◽  
Hae Su Kim ◽  
Kwai Han Yoo ◽  
Haa-Na Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Purpose The early molecular response (EMR, ≤ 10% BCR-ABL1 at 3 months) of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP) has been reported to have strong correlation with long-term outcome. We aim to investigate the prognostic interaction of the EMR and major molecular response (MMR). Methods We retrospectively reviewed data for a total of 165 patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP who received TKIs (imatinib, nilotinib, or dasatinib) as first-line treatment between January 2003 and April 2013. Of the total 128 patients who were regularly monitored by peripheral blood molecular analysis, 85 had a BCR-ABL1 assessment at 3 months and were finally included in the analysis. Results The median age of all patients was 49 years and 87.1% received imatinib as first line treatment. High risk group by Sokal and EUTOS were 29.4% and 14.1%, respectively. Patients with EMR (n = 56, 65.9%) had a tendency to have low risk disease and to be treated with 2nd generation of TKIs. With a median follow-up duration of 53.6 months (range, 5.4-131.3), the 5-year OS, 5-year FFS, and 5-year EFS were 92.5%, 74.8%, and 68.0%, respectively. Median time to achieve MMR was 11.1 months (95%CI, 8.4 - 13.8). The outcomes at 5 year comparing patients whose BCR-ABL1 transcript levels ≤ 10% vs >10% at 3 months were as follows: OS, 92.2% (95% CI 84.9-99.1) vs 92.8% (95% CI 83.7-102.3), p = 0.819; FFS, 84.7% (95% CI, 75.6-94.4) vs 57.4% (95% CI, 39.0-75.0), p < 0.001; and EFS, 73.6% (95% CI 62.5-85.5) vs 57.8% (95% CI 40.0-76.0), p = 0.050. Six (10.7%) of 56 patients with BCR-ABL1 transcript levels ≤ 10% at 3 months failed to achieved an MMR and 18 (62.1%) of 29 patients with > 10% at 3 months achieved an MMR. Based on these heterogeneous clinical outcomes, we further explored subgroup analysis according to the achievement of MMR for refined discrimination of survival outcomes. There was no significant difference of clinical outcomes between ≤ 10% vs > 10% at 3 months among the patients who achieved MMR (OS, p = 0.376; FFS, p = 0.793; and EFS, p = 0.266). In patients who did not achieved MMR, only FFS was significantly difference between ≤ 10% vs > 10% at 3 months (OS, p = 0.489; FFS, p = 0.014; and EFS, p = 0.199). Conclusion Patients who failed to achieve EMR but finally reached MMR have excellent prognosis that whether we have to change TKI for EMR failure is to be addressed by ongoing prospective clinical trials. Disclosures Jang: Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

The Combination of Interferon-Alpha with Imatinib in Early Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Induces a Significant Improvement of the Molecular Responses in the First Two Years of Treatment: Results From Three Studies From the GIMEMA CML Working Party.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2192-2192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Palandri ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Ilaria Iacobucci ◽  
Marilina Amabile ◽  
Gabriele Gugliotta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Interferon Alpha ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Transcript Levels ◽  
Ifn Alpha ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Abstract 2192 Poster Board II-169 Thanks to its striking effectiveness, imatinib (IM) is the current standard of therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) has induced a low but reproducible curative effect in some CML patients, inducing durable remissions lasting even after therapy discontinuation. For this reason, the interest on the possible use of IFN-alpha in the treatment of CML is still substantial, and very recently some newer prospective studies from the French and the German Groups have proposed the re-introduction of IFN-alpha in the front-line treatment of early chronic phase CML (ECP-CML), in association with IM (Rousselot et al, Haematologica 2009;94:abs.1093; Hehlmann et al, Haematologica 2009;94:abs. 0478). We compared the response of 495 ECP-CML patients, enrolled into three different prospective studies promoted by the GIMEMA CML WP (419 treated with imatinib 400mg and 76 treated with imatinib 400mg plus IFN-alpha) (study protocols NCT00511121, NCT00514488 and NCT00511303). Cytogenetic analysis was performed by standard banding techniques and cytogenetic response was rated according to the European LeukemiaNet guidelines. Molecular response was assessed on peripheral blood cells by a standardized quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) method on an ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector (Perkin Elmer, Faster City, CA). BCR-ABL transcript levels were expressed as a percentage according to the IS. Patients were equally distributed by Sokal risk in the two cohorts. Median follow-up was 43 mos (range, 12- 67) in the IM group and 54 mos (range, 11-63) in the IM+IFN-alpha group. Compliance to IM was excellent in both groups, with 90 to 95% of patients receiving IM 400 mg/daily throughout the follow-up. Conversely, the proportion of patients continuing IFN-alpha dropped from 41% at 12 mos to 18% at 18 mos, 13% at 24 mos, 3% at 36 mos; by the end of the fourth year, all patients were off IFN-alpha. The number of patients in CCgR was higher in the IM+IFN-alpha than in the IM group at 6 mos (60% vs 42%, p=0.002) but not from 12 mos on (Table 1). The number of patients in MMolR was higher in the IM+IFN-alpha than in the IM group at 6, 12 and 24 mos, but not later on (Table 2). Also the number of patients with undetectable Bcr-Abl transcript levels was higher in the IM+IFN-alpha group at 12 months (15% vs 5%, p=0.003) but not later on (19% vs 18% at 48 mos). These data support the preliminary analysis of the French SPIRIT group, reporting a higher rate of MMolR after initial treatment with IM and IFN-alpha as compared to IM alone. The loss of the difference from 24 mos on could be explained by the fact that almost all patients had discontinued IFN-alpha during the first two years, pointing out that the low compliance to the combination may limit its utility in practice. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Italian Association Against Leukemia-lymphoma and myeloma (BolognAIL), The Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna, The Italian Ministery of Education (PRIN 2005, No. 20050 63732_003, and PRIN 2007, No 2007F7 AE7B_002), The University of Bologna, The European Union (European LeukemiaNet). Disclosures: Pane: Novartis: Research Funding; Ministero dell'Università/PRIN: Research Funding; Regione Campania: Research Funding; Ministero della Salute/Progetto integrato Oncologia: Research Funding. Saglio:Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Imatinib Mesylate Is Safe and Effective in Maintaining Cytogenetic and Molecular Response Achieved with 1 Year Nilotinib First Line in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Clinical Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5445-5445
Author(s):  
Nour Moukalled ◽  
Radwan Massoud ◽  
Rami Mahfouz ◽  
Jean Elcheikh ◽  
Ali Bazarbachi
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Metabolic Complications ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Long Term Treatment

Abstract Background: Achieving complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 12 months for patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treated with imatinib as first line, is associated with significantly improved progression-free survival. Nilotinib has shown a faster and higher rate of CCyR and molecular response as compared to imatinib. However, nilotinib use is associated with diet restriction, higher financial costs, and its long-term use is incriminated in cardiovascular and metabolic complications. Methods: In this prospective single center trial, we evaluated the ability of imatinib to maintain a CCyR achieved after 12 months of first-line treatment with nilotinib. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with previously untreated Philadelphia -positive CML in chronic phase, with a WHO performance status ≤ 2. Patients received 1-year treatment with nilotinib (300mg twice daily) then were shifted to imatinib 400mg daily. Results: Eleven patients (5 females) were so far enrolled in the study, with a median age at diagnosis of 50 years (range 31-83). Patients were started on Nilotinib at a median of 29 days (range 2-32) from diagnosis. One patient had to discontinue nilotinib after 6 months and start dasatinib due to recurrent pancreatitis that resolved upon interruption of nilotinib. Eight patients completed one year of nilotinib, and were switched to Imatinib. The remaining 2 patients are currently on nilotinib as per protocol (less than 12 months since inclusion). Three patients on imatinib had to be switched back to nilotinib, because of imatinib intolerance (n=2; elevated liver transaminases and myositis) or because of loss of MMR (n=1). Therefore, at last follow up (median 64 months), 5 patients are on imatinib, 5 on nilotinib and 1 on dasatinib. All patients (100%) achieved complete hematological response (CHR) and CCyR at 3 and 18 months respectively, and maintained them thereafter. At 12 months, 6 out of 8 eligible patients achieved complete molecular response (CMR; n=3) or major molecular response (MMR; n=3). At 36 months, all eligible patients (n=7) were either in CMR (n=2) or in MMR (n=5). All patients who reached 4 years (n=6), 5 years (n=5) or 6 years (n=3) of follow up remained in either MMR or CMR. No patient developed long-term serious adverse event including cardiovascular or metabolic complications. Conclusion: These findings suggest that imatinib can maintain MMR achieved on short-term nilotinib therapy. This strategy is a potentially safe and effective long-term treatment approach, minimizing costs and cardiovascular and metabolic complications. This however, needs confirmation with a larger number of patients. Table. Table. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Budget Impact analysis of the first-line treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (Ph+ CML) adult patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Mennini ◽  
Andrea Marcellusi ◽  
Raffaella Viti ◽  
Giuseppe Saglio
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Budget Impact ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Number Of Patients

Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have dramatically improved survival in chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML‐CP), with a high percentage of patients reaching a major molecular response (MMR). Recently, several clinical trials demonstrated that some patients with CML-CP who achieve a sustained MMR on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy can safely discontinue their therapy and attempt treatment-free remission (TFR).Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of TFR in naïve patients with CML-CP who start treatment with nilotinib, imatinib or dasatinib as first-line therapy, from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS).Methods: An Excel-based budget impact model was developed, in order to estimate the costs of the patients in first-line pharmacological treatment with CML. A specific Markov model was built, to simulate seven years of treatment with different TKIs. A systematic literature review was carried out, to identify the epidemiological and economic data, which were subsequently used to inform the model. The model considers two scenarios: 1) a Standard of Care (SoC) scenario, with the current estimated distribution of patients over the various TKI treatment, versus 2) an innovative scenario, characterized by an increase in the use of nilotinib (+28%) and generic imatinib (+35%) and a decrease in the use of dasatinib (-17%). A one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed, in order to consider the variability of the results as a function of the main parameters considered in the model.Results: The model estimated that 775 patients with CML-CP could be treated with a TKI as first-line drug. The innovative scenario could increase TFR patients by approximately 60% and reduce the costs by more than € 30 million over 7 years. The increase in the use of nilotinib and the generic imatinib would generate a significant expenditure reduction.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the economic effects of discontinuing TKIs in CML-CP patients. The increase in the use of nilotinib and the generic imatinib could generate an increase in the number of patients who achieve TFR, as well as an actual cost reduction.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Multi-Drug Resistance 1 Gene (MDR1) Expression in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia on Nilotinib Treatment—a Subanalysis of the ENEST1st Study

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3144-3144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Dietz ◽  
Michael Lauseker ◽  
Benjamin Hanfstein ◽  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
Thoralf Lange ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Multi Drug Resistance ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
First Line ◽  
Molecular Responses ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Mdr1 Expression

Abstract Introduction MDR1 gene expression has recently been reported to be associated with clinical outcome in imatinib-resistant patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) on second-line nilotinib treatment (Agrawal et al., Leukemia 2014). High MDR1 expression was predictive for achieving deeper cytogenetic and molecular responses as well as duration of chronic phase. We thus prospectively evaluated the value of MDR1 expression analysis in the first-line situation within a large European, multicenter trial of CML patients under treatment with nilotinib. Methods 305 patients enrolled on the ENEST1st study (Evaluating Nilotinib Efficacy and Safety in clinical Trials as First-Line Treatment, NCT01061177) consented to participate in this substudy. Of these, 225 patients were evaluable due to sample availability and presence of typical e14a2 and/or e13a2 BCR-ABL1 transcripts. The median age was 52 (range 18-83), 39% were female. Prior to therapy, the expression of MDR1, BCR-ABL1, and GUSB were determined using a serial dilution of a plasmid constructs harboring MDR1 and GUSB and BCR-ABL1 and GUSB sequences. Ratios MDR1/GUSB and BCR-ABL1/GUSB were calculated. ROC curves were established using initial MDR1 and BCR-ABL1 expression levels aiming to achieve the primary endpoint of MR4 (defined as BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.01% on the International Scale [BCR-ABL1IS] or undetectable BCR-ABL1 in cDNA with ≥ 10,000 ABL1 transcripts) at 18 months or to achieve a MMR (≤ 0.1% BCR-ABL1IS) at 9 months. Mann-Whitney tests have been applied using a significance level of 0.05. Results At 9 months, 161 patients (72%) achieved MMR and at 18 months 111 patients (49%) a MR4. The median ratio MDR1/GUSB among all evaluable patients was 11.4% (range, 0.6-318.1), the median ratio BCR-ABL1/GUSB was 22.2% (range 0.09-198.7). Initial BCR-ABL1/GUSB levels did not predict MMR or MR4 at 9 or 18 months. However, initial ratios MDR1/GUSB were predictive for the achievement of MMR at 9 months (best cut-off 3.8%, sensitivity 88.8%, specificity 26.6%, AUC 0.598, p=0.022) and for reaching MR4 at 18 months (best cut-off 7.90%, sensitivity 72.1%, specificity 51.8%, AUC 0.624, p=0.001). Conclusions High MDR1 expression levels in newly diagnosed CML patients appear to be associated with deeper molecular responses within the first 18 months of nilotinib treatment. These data merit further exploration and if validated would justify the investigation of frontline CML therapy guided by baseline MDR1 expression levels. Disclosures Dietz: Novartis: Research Funding. Hanfstein:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding. Rousselot:Novartis: Research Funding. Lange:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Maier:Novartis: Research Funding. Foroni:Novartis: Research Funding. Gerrard:Novartis: Research Funding. Talmaci:Novartis: Research Funding. Janssen:Novartis: Research Funding. Frank:Novartis: Employment. Saussele:Pfizer: Honoraria, Travel, Travel Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel, Travel Other; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other. Giles:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Research Funding. Müller:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Estimating leukemia-free survival after allografting for chronic myeloid leukemia: a new method that takes into account patients who relapse and are restored to complete remission

Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Craddock ◽  
Richard M. Szydlo ◽  
John P. Klein ◽  
Francesco Dazzi ◽  
Eduardo Olavarria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
New Method ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Unrelated Donors

Abstract A significant number of patients who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) will achieve sustained remissions after treatment with interferon-, second transplants, or donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) from the original stem cell donor. Because leukemia-free survival (LFS) is at present defined as survival without evidence of relapse at any time posttransplant, patients who relapse but are then restored to complete remission are treated as failures when estimating LFS. We have established a new category of LFS, termed current LFS (CLFS), which we define as survival without evidence of leukemia at the time of most recent assessment. To gauge the contribution of treatment for relapse to the efficacy of allogeneic SCT in the management of CML in chronic phase, we compared conventional LFS and CLFS in 189 consecutive patients who underwent SCT over a 7-year period with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Patients with sibling donors (n = 111) received cyclosporine and methotrexate as prophylaxis for graft versus host disease; patients with unrelated donors (n = 78) also received Campath-1G or 1H as intravenous T-cell depletion. The 5-year LFS defined conventionally was 36% (CI: 29% to 43%) versus a 5-year CLFS of 49% (CI: 36% to 62%). This new method of defining LFS confirms the view that appropriate “salvage” therapy, principally DLI, makes a major contribution to the capacity of allogeneic SCT to produce long-term LFS in patients who receive SCT for CML and emphasizes the importance of redefining LFS to take account of successful treatment of relapse.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document