The Effects of Azacitidine On Quality of Life: A Prospective Longitudinal Assessment

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4938-4938
Author(s):  
Eric Tseng ◽  
Richard A. Wells ◽  
Shabbir MH Alibhai ◽  
Adam Lam ◽  
Alex Mamedov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Global Health Status ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Abstract 4938 The effect of azacitidine (AZA) on health related quality of life (QOL) compared with best supportive care in MDS patients has been evaluated by Kornblith A. et al (JCO 2002) in a prospective randomized CALGB trial. The study demonstrated improved fatigue, dyspnea, physical functioning and psychological state in patients receiving AZA. One limitation is the relatively short follow up (last QOL measured at 8. 6 months) and the lack of validation in a non-trial setting. We have been conducting prospective assessments of QOL in all patients registered at our MDS clinic using the instruments EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-Fatigue, EQ-5D and a global fatigue scale. We present longitudinal data on 56 registered patients registered in our program who were treated with AZA, 50 with serial QOLs. Methods: We examined and compared QOL scores at AZA start (baseline) and over time in all patients. We considered the following co-variates' potential impact on QOL scores: age, sex, IPSS, time from diagnosis, being a responder, # cycles and transfusion dependence. We used univariate linear regression analysis for continuous variables and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for categorical variables to determine their relationship with QOL scores at baseline and over time. For time-dependent covariates, linear mixed model was performed with random intercept and unstructured covariance matrix. Clinically significant (CS) score differences were considered 10 points for the QLQ-C30, 4 for the FACT-Fatigue and 0. 08 for the EQ-5D (7 for the visual analog score). The impact of baseline covariates on the QOL scores for global health, fatigue and dyspnea were determined by backward selection procedure of regression analysis using the Bonferroni adjusted P value of <0. 01 for multiple comparisons. Patients provided informed consent for this REB approved study. Results: 56 MDS patients consented to our registry have been treated with AZA between Oct 2008 and July 2012. The median age was 72, 60% were male and 77% had int-2/high risk IPSS MDS. 64 % were transfusion dependent (TD) at baseline. With a median time to death or last follow up of 16 months (range 1. 5–45) a median of 11 cycles of AZA were administered with 34% remaining on drug for a median of 25 cycles (IQR 8–32). The overall response rate (ORR) was 62%: 25% CR; 5% MCR; 4% PR; 28% HI. Stable disease (SD) was seen in 26% and not considered a response. 53% became transfusion independent (TI). 59% have died and 61% developed leukemia or progressed to > 30% blasts at a median time of 13 months. Overall survival was 18 months (95% CI 14. 5–26). 50 were evaluable for HrQOL with a median time between each serial QOL of 13 weeks (IQR 10–18). QOL was assessed at baseline (within 12 weeks pre-AZA start) in 50 patients, 2x in 44, 3x in 32, 4x in 22 and 5x in 14 patients (exceeding 52 weeks follow up). Looking at all 50 patients, overall, function and symptom domains remained stable over time in all instruments. At baseline, there were no statistically significant differences in QOL scores between responders and non responders. Nevertheless, clinically important differences were seen in physical, role, cognitive and social functioning, global health status (all higher in responders). Assessing QOL changes over time and considering baseline and time-dependent predictive factors in multivariate analysis, responders had significantly superior global health status (p=. 001) and EQ-5D scores (p=. 0002) and lower levels of fatigue (p<. 0001). If transfusion dependence status at time of QOL was included in the model, this often supplanted response as predictive of higher scores over time, likely representing the strong relationship between response and transfusion dependence. Conclusions: In addition to validating the clinical outcomes of AZA-001 study, we validate the importance of clinical response on QOL in MDS patients treated with AZA. Unlike the CALGB study, we observed relative stability in global health status and fatigue scores in responding patients and overall declines in non-responding patients. The higher scores at baseline in the patients destined for response raises the intriguing possibility that QOL at AZA start may be independently predictive of response perhaps because of improved tolerability and ability to remain on drug for the requisite number of cycles to achieve response. Disclosures: Wells: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Buckstein:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

The Independent Effects of Frailty and Comorbidity On the Quality of Life in MDS Patients

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 699-699
Author(s):  
Rena Buckstein ◽  
Shabbir M.H. Alibhai ◽  
Dina Khalaf ◽  
Adam Lam ◽  
Alex Mamedov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Global Health Status ◽  
Risk Categories ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Abstract 699 Background: MDS is a disease of the elderly. While comorbidity defined by the MDS comorbidity index (MDS-CI) may have independent impact on overall survival in MDS (Della Porta MG., Haematologica 2011), the impact of clinical frailty (an age-related vulnerability state created by loss of physiologic reserve) on clinical outcome and quality of life is not yet known. Rockwood and colleagues have developed a simple 9-point clinical frailty scale (CFS) based on clinical judgment that was highly correlated with the risk of death, institutionalization, worsening health and hospital use (Rockwood K., CMAJ 2005). Since 2008, we have prospectively assessed QOL in all patients registered at our MDS clinic using the instruments EORTC QLQ-C30, FACIT-F, and EQ-5D. Since January 2012, we have also recorded comorbidity and frailty. We present longitudinal QOL data on 240 patients and evaluate the effects of comorbidity (MDS-CI) and frailty (CFS) on QOL in addition to the more traditional covariates. Methods: We considered the following co-variates' potential impact on QOL scores: age, sex, IPSS, time from diagnosis, hemoglobin, transfusion dependence, MDS-CI categorically and frailty. We used univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis to determine their relationship with QOL scores at baseline and over time. For time-dependent covariates, linear mixed modelling was used. P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Spearman correlation was calculated between frailty and comorbidity. Clinically significant (CS) score differences were considered 10 points for the EORTC, 0.08 for EQ5-D and 4 for the FACT-Fatigue. Patients provided informed consent for this REB-approved study. Results: 236 patients (63% males) consented at a median time from diagnosis of 0.8 years (IQR 0.4–2.8). The median time to death or last follow-up was 2 years (95% CI 1.9–2.3). At first QOL assessment, the median age was 72 y. Of the 208 patients with measurable IPSS scores, 83% fell into low/low intermediate risk categories. 40% were transfusion dependent, 46% had a Hgb of <100 g/L and 31% had a ferritin >1000 ug/L. Serial QOLs were measured on 2 (n=187 patients), 3 (140), 4 (114), 5 (86), and 6 (63) occasions with a median lag time between QOLs of 17 weeks (IQR 12–26). The MDS-CI risk categories (scores) were Low (0): 46%, Intermediate (1–2): 41% and High (>2): 12%. The median Rockwood Frailty Score was 3 (range: 1–7). Compared to normative data from the general population, MDS patients had SS and CS differences in the following QLQ-C30 scales: worse physical, role, emotional and cognitive functioning, and worse fatigue and global health status. MDS-CI categories were weakly correlated with frailty (r= 0.25, p=.02). As we have previously shown, at baseline, transfusion dependence had significant negative impact on global health state (p=.0036), EQ-5D (p=.0001) and fatigue (p=.0051) scores and lower hemoglobin had negative impacts on fatigue (p=.01) and dyspnea (p<.0001). Patients with higher frailty scores had significantly worse fatigue (p=.001). Most QOL domains and global QOL scores remained stable over time (figure 1). When examined for significant changes over time, lower frailty scores were independently predictive of improved global health status and health utility (p< .0001) while patients with lower comorbidities had decreased levels of fatigue (p=.04) and dyspnea (p=.02) (Table 1). Conclusions: MDS health-related quality of life scores remain surprisingly stable over time. While transfusion dependence is still highly impactful, frailty and comorbidity are independent variables that should be routinely evaluated for their predictive effects on quality of life, drug toxicity and overall survival. Disclosures: Buckstein: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wells:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Ortho: Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Quality of Life Scores Improve with Increasing Hemoglobin but Optimal Thresholds Vary According to Transfusion Dependence and Clinical Risk Scores: A Canadian Cross Sectional Study of 689 Patients with 2969 Measurements

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3192-3192
Author(s):  
Rena Buckstein ◽  
Richard A. Wells ◽  
Nancy Y Zhu ◽  
Michelle Geddes ◽  
Mitchell Sabloff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
And Function

Abstract Background : We previously presented that selected quality of life (QOL) domains in MDS patients are impaired compared with age-matched controls and most impacted by hemoglobin (Hgb) level, transfusion dependence, frailty and comorbidity in an initial cohort of 236 patients from a Canadian MDS registry (Buckstein R. et al, Abstract 699, ASH 2012 and Abstract 2500, ASH 2009). The optimal Hgb threshold associated with improved QOL may vary according to health states that may fluctuate for any given patient. With longer follow up and greater sample size, we now examine the impact of Hgb levels on QOL in transfusion dependent (TD) versus independent (TI) patients and according to IPSS-R risk scores. Methods:Since 2008, we have prospectively assessed QOL in all patients registered in the Canadian national MDS registry using the instruments EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-F, global fatigue scale (GFS) and EQ-5D, at enrollment and every 4-6 months. These QOL data are paired with disease specific and laboratory information at the same time intervals. Each patient could provide multiple QOL measurements at different time points. Clinically significant score differences were considered 10 points for the EORTC, 0.08 for the EQ-5D and 4 for the FACT F. General linear regression analysis was applied to search for a significant relationship between physical and social functioning, dyspnea, fatigue and QOL with Hgb, according to transfusion dependence, IPSS and IPSS-R measured categorically. To account for multiple comparisons among 5 Hgb categories, Bonferroni adjusted p-value < .01 was considered statistically significant. Results: 689 patients from 15 Canadian sites completed their first QOL assessment at a median time of 7.8 (IQR 2.7-23) months from MDS diagnosis. The median time from MDS diagnosis to death or last follow-up was 2.5 years (IQR 1.2-4.9). The median Hgb at enrollment was 100 g/L (IQR 86-113) and the distribution of risk scores included: very low (13%); low (35%); intermediate (28%); high (15%); and very high (10%). 27% of patients were TD at enrollment and 54% were TD at any time. The median number of QOL assessments per patient completed was 3 (IQR 2-6) with 547 patients completing at least 2, 424 at least 3 and 335 at least 4 serial QOL measurements at a median time interval of 17 weeks (IQR 13-25). When examined by Hgb thresholds, mean physical functioning, dyspnea, fatigue (QLQ-C30 and GFS) and global QOL improved with increasing Hgb. QOL symptom and function scores were clinically and statistically significantly superior in TI versus TD patients (table 1). The optimal discriminating Hgb threshold for improved symptom and function scores was 100 g/L for patients that were TI or with IPSS-R very low, low and intermediate risk MDS; and 90 g/L for high and very high risk disease (table 2). No discriminating threshold was found in TD patients. Conclusions: In the largest reported serial cross sectional population based assessment of QOL in MDS patients, we confirm that higher Hgb and transfusion independence have significant impact on QOL, symptoms and self-reported function and should be considered important surrogate endpoints for clinical improvement. Disclosures Buckstein: Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wells:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: advisory board; Alexion: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board. Zhu:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Geddes:Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Sabloff:Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Research Funding. Leber:BMS Canada: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Keating:Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Storring:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee:Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Leitch:Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. St-Hilaire:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nevill:Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Shamy:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kumar:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Delage:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Patient-Reported Quality of Life (QoL) in Elderly, Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients Receiving Bortezomib-Based Combinations: Results From All Randomized Patients in the Community-Based, Phase 3b UPFRONT Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1864-1864 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Robert Rifkin ◽  
Nashat Gabrail ◽  
Veena Charu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Global Health Status ◽  
Linear Mixed Effect Model ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mixed Effect ◽  
Linear Mixed Effect ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Abstract 1864 Background: In addition to determining the efficacy and safety of different treatment options for MM, the impact of treatment and associated toxicities on patient-reported QoL should be evaluated. The US community-based phase 3b UPFRONT study compares the efficacy and safety of three bortezomib (VELCADE®, Vc)-based regimens, Vc-dexamethasone (VcD), Vc-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VcTD), and Vc-melphalan-prednisone (VcMP), followed by weekly Vc maintenance, in elderly, newly diagnosed, transplant-ineligible MM patients. Updated efficacy and safety data are reported elsewhere at this meeting; here we present patient-reported QoL results – a secondary endpoint of the trial – from all 502 randomized patients, who received up to a maximum of 13 treatment cycles. Methods: Patients with symptomatic MM were randomized (1:1:1) to receive eight 21-day cycles of VcD (Vc 1.3 mg/m2, days 1, 4, 8, 11; D 20 mg, days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 [cycles 1–4]), days 1, 2, 4, 5 [cycles 5–8]), VcTD (Vc as before; T 100 mg/day, days 1–21; D as before), or VcMP (Vc as before; M 9 mg/m2, and P 60 mg/m2, days 1–4, every other cycle) induction, followed by five 35-day cycles of maintenance with Vc 1.6 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15, 22. QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, which includes global health status, physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social functioning, and symptom scales of fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties. Global health status scores combine overall health and QoL scores, with higher scores reflecting better health status. Questionnaires were completed prior to dosing on day 1 of cycle 1 (baseline), prior to dosing on day 1 of every odd-numbered cycle, at the end-of-treatment visit, and every 12 weeks until progressive disease. Patient-reported QoL scores presented herein represent data collected within 1 year of randomization regardless of discontinuation status; for patients who died, missing assessments were assigned the worst possible score of 0. A linear mixed effect model was used to assess QoL changes over time, both within and between treatment arms. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the primary analysis. Results: Patient baseline characteristics were well balanced across the VcD (n=168), VcTD (n=167), and VcMP (n=167) arms as reported previously (Niesvizky et al, EHA 2011). Median age was 74.5 (VcD), 73.0 (VcTD), and 72.0 (VcMP) years, and 71%, 62%, and 72% of patients had ISS stage II/III disease. QoL assessments were available at baseline and ≥1 post-baseline time point for 78% (VcD), 69% (VcTD), and 78% (VcMP) of patients. Observed data showed a downward trend in mean global health status score until cycle 7 (VcD, VcMP) or 9 (VcTD), followed by a trend to stabilizing/improving score thereafter (Figure). Symptom scores changed very little during induction in all arms, except for nausea/vomiting and diarrhea, with moderate improvements seen during maintenance. After fitting observed data with a linear mixed effect model, a significant decrease in mean global health status score from baseline to cycle 7 (induction period) was evident in all arms (VcD, p=0.0127; VcTD, p<0.0001; VcMP, p=0.0157), but there were no significant inter-arm differences. During cycles 9–13 (maintenance period), mean global health status scores remained decreased from baseline in the VcD and VcTD arms, and there were significant differences between VcTD and VcMP, with lower scores in the VcTD arm. Sensitivity analyses incorporating patients' QoL data collected after discontinuation of treatment (for patients who discontinued within 1 year) and utilizing a last observation carried forward approach, gave similar results to the linear mixed effect model. Conclusions: The observed data, linear mixed model estimates, and sensitivity analyses all show a common trend to a transient decrease in QoL during VcD, VcTD, and VcMP induction followed by a subsequent trend to improvement/stabilization in QoL during single-agent Vc maintenance. The trend to decreasing QoL seen during Vc-based induction may reflect the onset of treatment-related toxicities (particularly for VcTD, which was associated with somewhat higher toxicity rates). Post-induction improvements/stabilization in QoL may reflect the beneficial impact of achieving a response and the limited toxicity profile associated with weekly Vc maintenance. Disclosures: Niesvizky: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Research Funding. Flinn:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Rifkin:Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Charu:Pfizer: Equity Ownership; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Equity Ownership; Roche: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Neuwirth:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Huang:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Employment. Choi:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Corzo:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment.

Pomalidomide (POM) Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone (LoDEX) Improves Health-Related Quality Of Life (HRQoL) Vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDEX) In Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients Enrolled In MM-003 Phase 3 Randomized Trial

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2939-2939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin W. Song ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Katja Weisel ◽  
Michel Delforge ◽  
Lionel Karlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Status ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Emotional Functioning ◽  
Global Health Status ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Background Pronounced symptoms, poor prognosis, and therapy exhaustion each affect HRQoL in RRMM patients. The MM-003, randomized, multicenter, open-label phase 3 trial reported that POM + LoDEX significantly extended median progression-free and overall survival vs HiDEX in RRMM patients who exhausted bortezomib (BORT) and lenalidomide (LEN), and progressed on their last treatment (San Miguel, EHA, 2013). Improved survival outcomes, treatment-related toxicity, and aging populations have placed an emphasis on HRQoL in RRMM. MM-003 is the first study to investigate HRQoL in RRMM patients treated with POM + LoDEX. Methods Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive 28-day cycles (C) of POM 4 mg D1-21 + LoDEX 40 mg (20 mg for patients aged > 75 years) weekly or HiDEX 40 mg (20 mg for patients aged > 75 years) D1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. HiDEX was chosen as the comparator to isolate the effects of POM as at the time of trial design, it was the standard salvage therapy for heavily pretreated patients. Time to meaningful worsening in HRQoL was analyzed for 5 predefined EORTC QLQ-C30 domains (Global Health Status, Physical Functioning, Fatigue, Emotional Functioning, and Pain) using the Kaplan-Meier method. A meaningful worsening was defined as a reduction in HRQoL equal to or greater than the domain-specific minimally important difference, calculated using the standard error of measurement. HRQoL was also evaluated cross-sectionally and longitudinally through a mixed effect model. Data from the September 7, 2012 data cut are presented below. Results 455 patients were randomized to POM + LoDEX (n = 302) or HiDEX (n = 153). 448 patients completed at least 1 QLQ-C30 questionnaire and were included in the HRQoL analysis. The median number of prior treatments was 5 (range, 2-17), and 82% were refractory to LEN and BORT. Median follow-up was 4.2 months. Analyses on time to clinically meaningful worsening showed that POM + LoDEX extended median time to meaningful worsening vs HiDEX for all the preselected domains (Table): Global Health Status (114 vs 85 days, P = .06), Physical Functioning (174 vs 106 days; P = .09), Fatigue (113 vs 60 days; P = .04), Emotional Functioning (190 vs 124 days; P = .02), and Pain (147 vs 113 days; P = .2). In the cross-sectional analysis, HRQoL scores were relatively better for POM + LoDEX vs HiDEX for all domains at every cycle. Statistically or marginally significant (P < .10) treatment differences were observed for Global Health Status (C2 and 4), Physical Functioning (C2, 3, and 4), Emotional Functioning (C3), and Fatigue (C2) domains. No statistically significant deteriorations from baseline were observed in the mean scores for the POM + LoDEX arm for any of the 5 domains at any treatment cycle. Such deteriorations were observed with HiDEX. These results were supported by a mixed effect model analysis. Data from the March 1, 2013 data cut will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions In heavily pretreated patients who exhausted BORT and LEN, POM + LoDEX resulted in better clinical outcomes and favorable HRQoL vs patients treated with HiDEX. POM + LoDEX should become a standard of care in relapsing patients as it has been proven to prolong and enhance the lives of RRMM patients. Disclosures: Song: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: POM is approved in the US but not in Europe. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Weisel:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Delforge:Celgene: Honoraria. Karlin:Celgene: Export board committee Other, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Moreau:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Oriol:Celgene: Consultancy. Spencer:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Knop:Celgene: Honoraria. Renner:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Travel support Other. Bahlis:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Amatya:Celgene: Consultancy. Yu:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Monzini:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sternas:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jacques:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. San Miguel:Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Routine Use of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in 7+3-Based Inductions for All "Non-Adverse" Risk AML

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 36-37
Author(s):  
Gavin Hui ◽  
Abdullah Ladha ◽  
Edna Cheung ◽  
Caroline Berube ◽  
Steven Coutre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Monosomy 7

Introduction: The addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to 7+3 chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been shown to significantly improve event-free survival (EFS) for cytogenetically favorable-risk AML, with marginal benefit for intermediate-risk AML, and no benefit for cytogenetically adverse-risk AML. Of note, with the exception of mutated FLT3-ITD, little is known about the impact of GO in ELN 2017-defined genotypically adverse-risk AML, and a recent randomized trial found no EFS benefit for 7+3+GO in patients (pts) with genotypically favorable-risk, NPM1-mutated AML. Since 2017, our institution incorporated GO into 7+3-based inductions for all "non-adverse" risk AML pts, as defined by wild-type FLT3 and no abnormalities on rapid FISH analysis for del(5q)/monosomy 5, del(7q)/monosomy 7, and del(20q). We report our experience treating all pts with "non-adverse" risk AML-as defined by this algorithm-with 7+3+GO. Methods: An institutional database was queried in order to identify all pts ≥18 years old who received 7+3-based chemotherapy for newly diagnosed AML between 2017 and 2020; pts who received the FDA-approved fractionated dose of GO were included in the analysis. Data collection included demographic variables, karyotype/FISH, targeted PCR analyses, and multigene NGS panels for AML-related mutations including, but not limited to, mutations in FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA, TP53, RUNX1, and ASXL1. Outcome data included response to induction, relapse, and death, as well as hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) rates, conditioning regimens, and post-transplant complications. Results: Between January 2017 and July 2020, 96 pts received 7+3-based induction at our institution. Of these, 29 (30%) received 7+3 in combination with GO. Median age at diagnosis was 46 years (range 23-66), with 17 (59%) males. Sixteen (55%) pts had ELN favorable-risk AML (5 [31%] by cytogenetics and 11 [69%] by genotype), 6 (21%) pts had ELN intermediate-risk AML, and 7 (24%) pts had ELN adverse-risk AML (4 [57%] by cytogenetics and 3 [43%] by genotype). Median time from diagnosis to start of induction was 4 days (range 0-43). For cytogenetically adverse-risk pts, median time from diagnostic bone marrow biopsy to receipt of adverse karyotype results was 8 days (7-14). Median time from start of induction to receipt of multigene NGS results for all pts was 15 days (3-32). Overall, 22 (76%) pts achieved remission. All genotypically adverse-risk pts (1 with mutated TP53 and 2 with mutated RUNX1) were refractory to induction, while 3 of 4 (75%) cytogenetically adverse-risk pts (1 with t(6;9), 1 with monosomy 7, and 2 with 11q23 abnormalities) achieved remission. Eight of the 29 (28%) pts proceeded to HCT, including 4 adverse-risk pts. Of the adverse-risk pts, all received myeloablative conditioning prior to HCT and 3 (75%) developed veno-occlusive disease (VOD), with 2 (50%) requiring defibrotide therapy. In favorable/intermediate-risk pts, 4 (18%) proceeded to HCT (2 intermediate-risk pts in first remission and 2 favorable-risk pts in second remission). Of these, 2 (50%) received myeloablative conditioning and 1 (25%) developed VOD. At last follow-up, 23 of 29 pts (79%) remained alive, with a median overall survival not reached (range 1-29 months) and a median EFS of 20 months (9-31). The percentage of ELN favorable-, intermediate-, and adverse-risk pts who remained event-free at last follow-up was 75%, 33%, and 43%, respectively. Discussion: This single-center, retrospective cohort describes the outcomes of pts with "non-adverse" risk AML who received induction chemotherapy with 7+3+GO according to a pre-defined algorithm. Using this algorithm, 30% of all pts receiving 7+3-based inductions received GO. Of these, nearly 25% were ultimately found to have adverse-risk AML as defined by ELN 2017 criteria, largely driven by long turn-around times for karyotyping and NGS multigene panel results. No patient with genotypically adverse-risk AML by ELN criteria responded to induction chemotherapy, and 75% of cytogenetically adverse-risk pts who proceeded to HCT developed VOD. Routine use of 7+3+GO induction outside of the context of cytogenetically favorable-risk AML remains controversial, and further study is needed to define the role of GO, particularly for pts with ELN genotypically adverse-risk AML. Table Disclosures Gotlib: Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chair of the Response Adjudication Committee and Research Funding, Research Funding; Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: co-chair of the Study Steering Committee and Research Funding. Liedtke:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Muffly:Adaptive: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Servier: Research Funding. Mannis:AbbVie, Agios, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech: Consultancy; Glycomimetics, Forty Seven, Inc, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Improvements in Health-Related Quality of Life and Symptoms in Patients with Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Final Results from the Phase II GIBB Study of the Combination of Obinutuzumab and Bendamustine

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3491-3491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Danilov ◽  
Habte A Yimer ◽  
Michael Boxer ◽  
John M Burke ◽  
Sunil Babu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Future Health ◽  
Equity Ownership

Introduction: Longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). GIBB (NCT02320487) is an open-label, single-arm phase II study of obinutuzumab (GA101; G) in combination with bendamustine (G-Benda) in patients with previously untreated CLL. A previous report from the GIBB study demonstrated an investigator-assessed objective response rate of 89.2%, a complete response rate of 49.0%, and no unexpected safety signals with G-Benda (Sharman et al. J Clin Oncol 2017). Here we report the final HRQoL data over 3 years from the GIBB study. Methods: Enrolled patients received G-Benda by intravenous infusion over six 28-day cycles: G 100mg on Day (D)1, 900mg on D2, and 1000mg on D8 and D15 of Cycle (C)1, then 1000mg on D1 of C2-6; benda 90mg/m2 on D2-3 of C1, and on D1-2 of C2-6. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) includes a global health status measure, 5 functional scales (physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and role functioning), 8 symptom scales/items (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea), and an item on financial difficulties (Aaronson et al. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993). The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 16 (QLQ-CLL16) is a 16-item module, specific to CLL, containing 4 multi-item scales (fatigue, treatment side effects, disease symptoms, and infection) and 2 single items (social activities and future health worries). Both questionnaires were completed by patients on C1D1 (baseline), C3D1, and C6D1, at the end of induction (EOI) treatment (defined as +28 days from C6D1 or early treatment termination visit), at the response visit (defined as 2-3 months after the EOI treatment for all patients who received study treatment and had not experienced disease progression), and every 3 months thereafter at follow-up visits for up to 2 years. In total, there were 14 timepoints where data were collected. HRQoL scores were linear transformed to a 0-100-point scale. Mean baseline scores and mean score changes from baseline at each visit were evaluated. A threshold of ≥10-point change in score represents a clinically meaningful difference. For symptoms, negative change scores from baseline reflect an improvement in symptom burden. For global health status and functioning, positive change scores from baseline reflect improvements. Results: The trial enrolled 102 patients. Median age was 61 years and 68.4% of patients were male. Ninety-eight patients (96%) completed a questionnaire at baseline and at least 1 other questionnaire during a follow-up visit. Questionnaire completion rates at 14 time points ranged from 96% at baseline to 66% at 27 months follow-up (Table 1). According to the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Figure 1), improvements were observed for global health status at all follow-up visits, and clinically meaningful improvements were observed at the response visit, 3 months follow-up, and 27 months follow-up. Clinically meaningful improvements in role functioning were observed at EOI and persisted throughout the 27-month follow-up. For fatigue, clinically meaningful improvements were observed at every visit starting from the end of treatment (EOT) visit. Improvements were also observed for insomnia with mean reductions from baseline ≥10 points at various time points during follow-up. There was no worsening in other patient-reported symptoms or functional status over time. Similarly, with the EORTC QLQ-CLL16 (Figure 2), clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms were observed for fatigue, disease symptoms, and future health worries during treatment, at the EOT and/or throughout the follow-up. The largest improvement was observed for fatigue (-24.7) at the 24-month follow-up and future health worries (-25.4) at the 27-month follow-up. Conclusions: We previously reported that G-Benda is an effective regimen for first-line treatment of CLL with no unexpected safety signals. The HRQoL data from the GIBB trial suggest that G-Benda treatment consistently improved patient HRQoL over time. Several clinically meaningful improvements were observed in HRQoL, including global health status, functioning, symptoms, and future health worries. Disclosures Danilov: AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; MEI: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel Reimbursement , Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; Aptose Biosciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Verastem Oncology: Consultancy, Other: Travel Reimbursement , Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curis: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; MEI: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Yimer:AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Clovis Oncology: Equity Ownership; Puma Biotechnology: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy. Boxer:Gerson Lerman: Consultancy; Best Doctors: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Burke:Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Babu:Genentech: Research Funding. Li:Genentech: Employment; Roche: Equity Ownership. Mun:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trask:Genentech: Employment, Equity Ownership. Masaquel:Roche: Equity Ownership; Genentech: Employment. Sharman:Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: GAZYVA (obinutuzumab) is a CD20-directed cytolytic antibody and is indicated: in combination with chlorambucil, for the treatment of patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia; in combination with bendamustine followed by GAZYVA monotherapy, for the treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who relapsed after, or are refractory to, a rituximab-containing regimen

Observational Prospective Registry for the Assessment of the Clinical Impact of Starting Anti-Myeloma Treatment at Biological Relapse

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4765-4765
Author(s):  
Adrian Alegre ◽  
Merche Gironella ◽  
Juan Miguel Bergua ◽  
Esther Gonzalez ◽  
Fernando Escalante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Marrow Transplant ◽  
Clinical Relapse ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Despite the great medical advances associated with the introduction of thalidomide, bortezomib (BORT), and lenalidomide (LEN) for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), it remains an incurable disease. Most patients (pts) show disease progression, consistent with the clinical evolution of MM, and only a low percentage achieve long-term responses and extended progression-free survival (PFS). The heterogeneous nature of MM in both the clinical and biological setting is reflected in the heterogeneity of MM relapses. The International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel (Rajkumar, Blood 2011) states that treatment (Tx) shall begin either at clinical relapse with symptoms (clinR), or in the event of asymptomatic relapse with significant paraprotein relapse, biological relapse (BR). The purpose of this Spanish registry is to describe MM relapse patterns comparing the impact of Tx decisions in pts who meet the criteria for biological relapse (BR) according to IMWG criteria with those in whom Tx was delayed until clinical relapse (clinR). Here, the preliminary results of this study are presented. Methods: MM pts in (or previous to) first or second BR who have achieved ≥ PR since their last Tx are eligible for inclusion in this observational prospective registry at the time BR is detected. Evaluations performed at least bi-monthly are mandatory. A total of 41 Spanish sites participated in the registry following approval from their independent ethics committees, with 410 pts expected to be included, without physician’s decision of prescribing Tx affecting the inclusion. The main objective of the registry is to assess the time to progression (TTP) from the start of anti-MM Tx at the onset of asymptomatic BR vs. the start of Tx at the time of clinR. Secondary objectives are to describe demographics of BR; to assess the median time elapsing from BR to clinR; to assess overall response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), PFS, overall survival (OS) at BR and at clinR (if appropriate); to asses safety and quality of life (QoL) using 2 validated questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY24); to document the tolerability profile of the Tx; and to describe the use of associated resources. Here, we summarize baseline characteristics and preliminary results from 83 pts (out of 126 registered pts) who had basal data in the registry at the time of this report. Results: Overall, 79% of pts presented with a BR and 21% were in a bi-monthly watchful waiting follow up. The mean age of pts was 67 years, 53% were female, 57% were in first relapse, 43% and 27% had an ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 and 1, respectively, while the ECOG PS was unknown in 30% of pts at the time of this report. In total, 30% of pts had ISS stage I, 26% had ISS stage II, and 22% had ISS stage III, while ISS stage data were not available or unknown for 12% and 10% of pts, respectively. MM types were IgG Κ (37% of pts), IgG λ (23%), IgA Κ (13%), IgA λ (9%), and type was unknown in 17% of pts. 28% of IgG/IgA MM types were Bence-Jones. Cytogenetic risk assessments were available in 66% of pts. Among those pts with a BR, 51% received active Tx without waiting for a ClinR. First-line Tx was BORT-based in 70% of pts. Overall, 55% of pts had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation, 15% had received consolidation Tx and 34% had received maintenance Tx. After first-line Tx, 17% of pts achieved a stringent complete response (sCR), 31% achieved a CR, 24% achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), and 10% achieved a PR. The median time to BR was 24.53 months. Most (63%) pts who registered after second relapse received LEN-based Tx. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective study in MM to evaluate BR as well as the effects of Tx based on the decision to start Tx at BR vs. clinR. In this preliminary cohort, the physicians’ decision to start active Tx at BR, before the onset of clinR in 50% of cases, was noteworthy. Further follow-up is needed to identify the differences between these two strategies. Updated clinical results will be presented at the meeting. MM-BR Study, Spanish Myeloma Group-GEM/PETHEMA Bibliography Alegre A, et al. Haematologica. 2002;87:609-14. Brioli A, et al. Blood. 2014;123:3414-9. Fernández de Larrea C, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:223-7. Lenhoff S, et al. Haematologica. 2006;91:1228-33. Rajkumar SV, et al. Blood. 2011;117:4691-5. Zamarin D, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:419-24. Disclosures Alegre: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lahuerta:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ruiz:Celgene: Celgene Stock options as part of the employee's compensation plan Other, Employment. Vilanova:Celgene: Contracted by Celgene Other.

Five-Year Experience with Single-Agent Ibrutinib in Patients with Previously Untreated and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 233-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
Jan Burger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib (ibr), a first-in-class, once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved by the US FDA for treatment of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) including pts with del17p. The phase 1b/2 PCYC-1102 trial showed single-agent efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naïve (TN; O'Brien, Lancet Oncol 2014) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL (Byrd, N Engl J Med 2013). We report efficacy and safety results of the longest follow-up to date for ibr-treated pts. Methods: Pts received 420 or 840 mg ibr QD until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Overall response rate (ORR) including partial response (PR) with lymphocytosis (PR-L) was assessed using updated iwCLL criteria. Responses were assessed by risk groups: unmutated IGVH, complex karyotype (CK; ≥3 unrelated chromosomal abnormalities by stimulated cytogenetics assessed by a reference lab), and in hierarchical order for del17p, then del11q. In the long-term extension study PCYC-1103, grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs requiring dose reduction or discontinuation were collected. Results: Median age of the 132 pts with CLL/SLL (31 TN, 101 R/R) was 68 y (range, 37-84) with 43% ≥70 y. Baseline CK was observed in 41/112 (37%) of pts. Among R/R pts, 34 (34%) had del17p, 35 (35%) del11q, and 79 (78%) unmutated IGVH. R/R pts had a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1-12). Median time on study was 46 m (range, 0-67) for all-treated pts, 60 m (range, 0-67.4) for TN pts, and 39 m (range, 0-67) for R/R pts. The ORR (per investigator) was 86% (complete response [CR], 14%) for all-treated pts (TN: 84% [CR, 29%], R/R: 86% [CR, 10%]). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) for TN and 52 m for R/R pts with 60 m estimated PFS rates of 92% and 43%, respectively (Figure 1). In R/R pts, median PFS was 55 m (95% confidence intervals [CI], 31-not estimable [NE]) for pts with del11q, 26 m (95% CI,18-37) for pts with del17p, and NR (95% CI, 40-NE) for pts without del17p, del11q, trisomy 12, or del13q. Median PFS was 33 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and NR for pts with and without CK, and 43 m (95% CI, 32-NE) and 63 m (95% CI, 7-NE) for pts with unmutated and mutated IGVH, respectively(Figure 2). Among R/R pts, median PFS was 63 m (95% CI, 37-NE) for pts with 1-2 prior regimens (n=27, 3 pts with 1 prior therapy) and 59 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and 39 m (95% CI, 26-NE) for pts with 3 and ≥4 prior regimens, respectively. Median duration of response was NR for TN pts and 45 m for R/R pts. Pts estimated to be alive at 60 m were: TN, 92%; all R/R, 57%; R/R del17p, 32%; R/R del 11q, 61%; R/R unmutated IGVH, 55%. Among all treated pts, onset of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs was highest in the first year and decreased during subsequent years. With about 5 years of follow-up, the most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were hypertension (26%), pneumonia (22%), neutropenia (17%), and atrial fibrillation (9%). Study treatment was discontinued due to AEs in 27 pts (20%) and disease progression in 34 pts (26%). Of all treated pts, 38% remain on ibr treatment on study including 65% of TN pts and 30% of R/R pts. Conclusions: Single-agent ibrutinib continues to show durable responses in pts with TN or R/R CLL/SLL including those with del17p, del11q, or unmutated IGVH. With extended treatment, CRs were observed in 29% of TN and 10% of R/R pts, having evolved over time. Ibrutinib provided better PFS outcomes if administered earlier in therapy than in the third-line or beyond. Those without CK experienced more favorable PFS and OS than those with CK. Ibrutinib was well tolerated with the onset of AEs decreasing over time, allowing for extended dosing for 65% of TN and 30% of R/R pts who continue treatment. Disclosures O'Brien: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Furman:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Coutre:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Burger:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Sharman:Gilead: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Wierda:Abbvie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Jones:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Luan:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. James:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Chu:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Assessment of Quality of Life in the NCRI Spirit 2 Study Comparing Imatinib with Dasatinib in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4024-4024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander M. Labeit ◽  
Mhairi Copland ◽  
Leanne M. Cork ◽  
Corinne A. Hedgley ◽  
Letizia Foroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Well Being ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background: Imatinib and dasatinib are established drugs in the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Several studies, including SPIRIT2 have shown that first-line dasatinib (100mg once daily) has a superior complete cytogenetic and major molecular response rate compared to imatinib (400mg once daily), but no significant differences in progression-free or overall survival have been shown in any study. To date, there has been no direct comparison of quality of life (QoL) using generic and cancer-specific instruments for first-line treatment of chronic-phase CML with imatinib and dasatinib. SPIRIT2 (STI571 Prospective International Randomised Trial 2) is the first randomized clinical trial to incorporates generic and cancer-specific QoL measurement for first-line therapy. Methods: Quality of life is a secondary endpoint in the SPIRIT2 trial and has been assessed at baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months post trial entry and thereafter annually. The EQ-5D, FACT-G, FACT-BRM and the FACT-TOI have been used as QoL measures in this trial. The FACT-G covers cancer-specific QoL measure dimensions such as physical well-being, functional well-being, social and family well-being, emotional well-being and the FACT-BRM and the FACT-TOI different subsets of them. The QoL scores (EQ-5D, FACT-G, FACT-BRM, FACT-TOI) were calculated at different time points and comparison of the mean scores for both treatment groups was made. Results: A comparison between imatinib and dasatinib shows no significant difference in QoL in generic instruments and also in cancer-specific instruments. EQ-5D was 0.77 and 0.79 at baseline and 0.80 and 0.82 at one year for dasatinib and imatinib, respectively (2-3 basis points increase over 1 year). Similar results were obtained for the FACT-G, FACT-BRM and the FACT-TOI. There was a slight increase for the FACT-G (4-5 basis points), FACT-TOI (3-4 basis points) and FACT-BRM (8-10 basis points) after 1 year for both treatments, but this difference was not significant. The effects on the well-being and the emotional dimensions have been analysed for both drugs and there was no change over time, demonstrating results similar to the imatinib arm of the IRIS trial. Conclusions: Standard dose imatinib and dasatinib are both used as first-line treatments for CML and, despite different side effect profiles, there is no significant difference in QoL using the instruments described here between these two drugs over time. These data will allow the derivation of utility values to contribute to future health economic/technology appraisals. Additional analyses of how generic and cancer-specific measures of different QoL instruments change in CML patients over time in those patients that develop side effects, e.g. fluid retention with imatinib or pleural effusion with dasatinib will be presented. Disclosures Copland: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cork:BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Hedgley:Ariad: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Gills:Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Holyoake:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bescoby:Roche: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Pocock:Janssen: Honoraria. Clark:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pzifer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. O'Brien:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pzifer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Health-Related Quality of Life in a Biologic Assignment Trial of Reduced Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Based on Donor Availability in Patients Aged 50-75 with Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 421-421
Author(s):  
Rachel Cusatis ◽  
Michael Martens ◽  
Ryotaro Nakamura ◽  
Corey Cutler ◽  
Wael Saber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
No Donor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Abstract Introduction The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network study (BMT CTN 1102, NCT02016781) was a multicenter, biologic assignment trial in older adults aged 50-75 with higher risk de novo MDS (IPSS Intermediate-2 or High) who were candidates for reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic HCT. The trial compared outcomes of those with a suitable HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor (Donor arm) to those where no donor was identified (No Donor arm) within a search window of 90 days. The trial reported a survival benefit for patients in the Donor arm compared to the No Donor arm [Nakamura et al, JCO 2021, in press]. Here, we compare the health-related quality of life (QOL) for patients between the two arms through 36 months after enrollment. We also describe the predictors and trajectories of QOL. Methods English and Spanish-speaking subjects were invited to complete patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, including the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), the SF-36 yielding a Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS), and the EQ-5D, at enrollment and every 6 months until 24 months, then 36 months after enrollment. Validation studies indicate a clinically meaningful difference of 5 points for FACT-G, PCS, and MCS and 2 points for associated subscales. To account for the missingness of assessments, including those missing due to death, we compared each score between arms using an inverse probability weighted - independent estimating equation (IPW-IEE) model, which models the scores in surviving patients while using IPW to account for baseline variables and follow-up outcomes that impact the likelihood of missingness. Since 4 scores were evaluated, a Bonferroni corrected significance level of 1.25% = 5% / 4 was used. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the impact of QOL measures on overall and leukemia free survival. The IPW-IEE models adjust for baseline score and follow-up assessment time as well as age, race/ethnicity, performance status, IPSS score, duration of disease, and response to prior hypomethylating therapy; the Cox models adjusted for the 6 latter variables and treatment arm. Trajectories of QOL are shown by plotting mean +/- standard error by group over time. Results Between January 2014 and November 2018, 384 subjects (median age 66.7 years, range: 50.1-75.3) were enrolled at 34 centers and biologically assigned to Donor (n=261) or No Donor arm (n=123) by 90 days from enrollment. For the Donor arm the median duration from registration to HCT was 3.9 months (range 0.3-20.7). Completion rates were generally high at 65-78% of eligible survivors at each timepoint. At enrollment, 204 subjects (78.2%) in the Donor arm and 85 subjects (69.1%) in the No Donor arm completed at least one QOL form, with 4 patients unable to complete due to language (non-English or Spanish speaking). While there were some small differences at 18 months favoring the Donor arm, no clinically significant differences in PRO scores or subscales were seen between the arms at any timepoint (Figure 1) or in the scores over time. In general, similar trajectories for the Donor arm were seen for each PRO, with most decreasing or stable from baseline to 6 months and improving thereafter. Compared to published averages of U.S cancer populations, FACT-G means in both arms were higher beginning at 18 months. Baseline and 6-month PRO scores were the strongest predictors of later PRO scores despite adjusting for patient demographic and clinical factors. Overall survival was predicted by baseline FACT-G &lt;70 (HR=1.61, p&lt;.01) and PCS scores &lt;40 (HR=1.82, p&lt;0.001), while leukemia-free survival was predicted by baseline FACT-G &lt;70 (HR=1.61, p&lt;0.01) and PCS &lt;40 (HR=1.80, p&lt;0.002). No associations of PROs with AML transformation, relapse, or acute or chronic GVHD were found. Non-compliance with biologic assignment was less likely in Donor arm compared to No Donor, but baseline QOL was not a confounding factor. Conclusion In older adults with MDS, the survival advantage associated with Donor availability and HCT does not come at the cost of worse QOL in comparison to the No Donor arm. Baseline PRO scores were the strongest independent predictors of subsequent QOL outcomes and survival, even after controlling for clinical and patient-level factors. These results should reassure older patients and clinicians who prefer curative approaches to MDS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cutler: Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; Editas: Consultancy; CareDx: Consultancy; Kadmon: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Cimeio: Consultancy; Deciphera: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy. Saber: Govt. COI: Other. Lee: Takeda: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; National Marrow Donor Program: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Other; Incyte: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Shaw: mallinkrodt: Other: payments; Orca bio: Consultancy. Horowitz: Magenta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy; Daiicho Sankyo: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; bluebird bio: Research Funding; Chimerix: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Medac: Research Funding; Kiadis: Research Funding; Xenikos: Research Funding; Vor Biopharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc: Research Funding; Orca Biosystems: Research Funding; Omeros: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotech: Research Funding; Mesoblast: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; Stemcyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Tscan: Research Funding; Vertex: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document