Quality of Life in Patients With Rectal Resections and End-to-End Primary Anastomosis Using a Standardized Perioperative Pathway

Objectives: Lower rectal resection is associated with a high rate of postoperative complications and, therefore, adversely impacts the postoperative health-related quality of life (QoL). Though sporadically practiced in different centers, there is no standard perioperative protocol for the management of patients with rectal growths. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes after low rectal resections followed by an end-to-end-reconstruction and temporary covering ileostomy using a multidisciplinary fail-safe-concept.Methods: Between 2015 and 2020, we evaluated patient reported outcomes after open and laparoscopic rectal resections with end-to-end reconstruction with a primary straight anastomosis using a standardized perioperative pathway All patients with stoma were excluded from the study. The data for the QoL of patients was collected using the established Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS)-score and the EORTC-C30 and CR-29 questionnaires at a single postoperative timepoint.Results: We recruited 78 stoma-free patients for this analysis. Of 78 patients included in the study, 87.2% were operated laparoscopically and the mean global health status was 67.95 points, while a major LARS was detected in 48 (61.5%) patients. No anastomotic leakage (AL) occurred within the study cohort. There was no significant change in the LARS-score or the global health status depending on the follow-up-period.Conclusion: This study shows that good QoL and functional outcomes with no AL are achievable following end-to-end straight anastomosis using a standardized perioperative surgical fail-safe protocol procedure.

Evaluating the Role of Baseline Geriatric Assessment in Predicting Quality of Life in Older Adults with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma on Oral Targeted Therapies

Background: Oral targeted therapies (OTT) have transformed the care of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with significantly improved survival outcomes compared to chemo-immunotherapy. While data from clinical trials suggest improvement in global health and some symptom scores, there is limited data on health-related outcomes in older adults who are more vulnerable to treatment-related adverse effects. Geriatric assessments can predict chemotherapy-related toxicity in older adults and the presence of geriatric impairments is associated with inferior quality of life. The role of geriatric assessment (GA) in predicting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment toxicity in patients with NHL on OTT is unknown. In this prospective study, we describe the association between OTT and HRQoL in older adults with NHL. We further describe the relationship between baseline geriatric assessment and longitudinal HRQoL parameters. Methods: We included patients (pts) ≥70 years (yrs) of age with NHL, initiating or already receiving OTT. A GA, including assessment of function, depression, cognition, physical performance and comorbidities, was performed at baseline. Pts were followed monthly for the first 3 months (mos), then every 3 mos for 1 year. Quality of life (QoL) was measured at each visit using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC QLQ - chronic lymphocytic leukemia 16 (EORTC QLQ-CLL16). The log QoL scores were modeled as a function of visit and mean scores at 6 months were compared to baseline using a linear mixed model. A change in score of >10 was considered clinically significant based on previous work. Results: We enrolled 25 pts with a median age of 77 yrs (71-93 yrs). Median follow up was 6.3 mos (range, 2.7-8.8 mos). The most common diagnosis was chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=21) followed by mantle cell lymphoma (n=3) and marginal zone lymphoma (n=1). Most pts (72%) were on OTT at study entry and the most frequently used OTTs were ibrutinib (n=17) and venetoclax (n=5). GA revealed the presence of a geriatric syndrome (GS) in more than 90% of pts, including cognitive impairment (28%), depression (24%), polypharmacy (92%) and recent falls (12%); 48% of pts had ≥2 GS. Nine pts (36%) had impaired 4-meter gait speed and/or timed-up-and-go (TUG); 20 pts (80%) had an adjusted CIRS-G score of ≥6. At baseline, dependence in independent activities of daily living (IADL) was associated with inferior global health status scores (69.1 vs 86.1, p=0.023) and physical functioning scores (66.7 vs 88.1, p=0.008). Similarly, an abnormal TUG (>10 seconds) was associated with a lower global health score (71.3 vs 86.1, p=0.037). Dependence in 2 or more activities of daily living (ADL) was also associated with lower baseline physical functioning scores (57.8 vs 88.0, p=0.003) and role functioning scores (61.1 vs 90.8, p=0.030). During the 6-month follow up, there was significant worsening of global health status (mean difference -5.4, p=0.024) and cognitive functioning scores (mean difference -9.6, p<0.001) in the entire cohort. There were no changes in other functional scales (physical, role, emotional and social functioning, fatigue scale, infection scale, social problems and future health) over time (Figure 1). Trends in symptom scores were mixed with improvement in some scores (pain, fatigue) and worsening of others (dyspnea, diarrhea, constipation), none of which met the predefined criteria for clinical relevance (absolute difference of >10). Presence of various geriatric impairments at baseline did not impact changes noted in global health, physical, emotional, social and role functioning over time. Interestingly, we found a greater improvement in symptom scores in patients with baseline impairments in IADL (fatigue, pain), ADL (pain) and a CIRS-G score of ≥6 (insomnia). Conclusion: The presence of geriatric syndromes is common in older adults with NHL with almost half of the patients in our cohort with ≥2 GS. Older adults with GS had lower baseline global health status and physical functioning scores but experienced greater improvement in symptoms scores and maintenance of longitudinal HRQoL than those without GS at baseline. Chronological age had no impact on baseline or longitudinal HRQoL, underscoring the need to incorporate GA into clinical practice rather than relying on age alone. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wildes: Janssen: Consultancy; Carevive: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Torka: TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) from the phase 2 CodeBreaK 100 trial evaluating sotorasib in KRAS p.G12C mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

9057 Background: In the registrational phase 2 CodeBreaK 100 trial, sotorasib demonstrated a response rate of 37.1% with median duration of 10.0 months, a median progression-free survival of 6.8 months, and a tolerable safety profile in patients with pretreated KRAS p.G12C mutated NSCLC. Patients received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy. Here, we report PRO measures of health-related quality of life (QoL), physical functioning, and key lung cancer symptoms from this trial. Methods: Eligible patients had KRAS p.G12C mutated advanced NSCLC and received prior standard therapies. Sotorasib was given at an oral daily dose of 960 mg with 21-day treatment cycles until disease progression. Disease-related symptoms and health-related QoL were evaluated as exploratory endpoints on day 1 of each cycle from baseline to discontinuation, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its lung cancer module, EORTC QLQ-LC13. The single item, 5-point scale GP5, of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General version was used to evaluate the impact of side effects. Predefined analyses included change from baseline using descriptive statistics and mixed model for repeated measures for global health status/QoL, physical functioning, and key lung cancer symptoms of cough, dyspnea and chest pain. Results: Of 126 patients enrolled, compliance rates for each of the questionnaires were high throughout the study ( > 70%). Data up to cycle 11 (where n > 20) are presented. EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL and physical functioning were maintained over time (least-square mean changes ranged from -3.5 to 0.2 and 0.1 to 3.9, respectively). EORTC QLQ-C30 symptoms of fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, and constipation were stable or improved. Similarly, key lung cancer-related symptoms, as measured by EORTC QLQ-LC13, remained stable or improved from baseline, with the greatest least-square mean change of -11.2 (95% Cl: -16.2, -6.1) for cough, -4.9 (95% Cl: -10.3, 0.4) for chest pain, and -3.4 (95% Cl: -7.8, 1.0) for dyspnea. Most patients reported on the GP5 that they were “not at all” (54.2%-79.2%) or “a little bit” (8.3%-33.3%) bothered by side effects from sotorasib, with 0%-7.4% reporting being bothered as “quite a bit” and 0% as “very much”. Conclusions: In patients from the single-arm phase 2 trial of sotorasib, PRO measures suggested maintenance or improvement of global health status/QoL, physical functioning, and the severity of key lung cancer-related symptoms, including cough, dyspnea, and chest pain. Self-reported side effect bother was minimal. These data, together with the encouraging efficacy and safety profiles, strongly support the use of sotorasib in this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03600883.

FOENIX-CCA2 quality of life data for futibatinib-treated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) patients with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements.

4097 Background: In FOENIX-CCA2 (NCT02052778), a pivotal phase 2 study among iCCA patients (pts) with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements, the highly selective, irreversible FGFR1–4 inhibitor futibatinib demonstrated a confirmed objective response rate of 41.7%, with a 9.7-month median duration of response. Adverse events were manageable with dosing modifications that did not adversely impact on response. We report outcomes for the preplanned analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) during futibatinib treatment as a secondary objective of FOENIX-CCA2. Methods: Pts enrolled in FOENIX-CCA2 had locally advanced/metastatic unresectable iCCA with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements, ≥1 prior line of therapy (including gemcitabine/cisplatin) and ECOG PS 0-1. Pts received oral futibatinib 20 mg continuous QD dosing per 21-day cycle. PRO measures included EORTC-QLQ-C30 (1 global health, 5 functional, 9 symptom scales), EQ-5D-3L, and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). PROs were collected at screening, cycles 2 and 4, every 3 cycles thereafter, and end of treatment. PRO data were evaluated up to cycle 13, the last visit before data were missing for >50% of the PRO population (PRO primary assessment time point). Results: 92/103 (89.3%) pts enrolled had PRO completion data at baseline and a minimum of 1 follow-up assessment (median age 58 y, 56.5% female), with 48 pts having PRO data at cycle 13. At baseline, mean (SD) EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status score was 70.1 (19.4) and EQ VAS score 71.7 (20.3). Mean EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status scores were maintained from baseline to cycle 13, corresponding to 9.0 months on treatment, with no clinically meaningful (≥10-point) changes in individual functional measures (Table). EORTC QLQ-C30 scores across individual symptom measures were also stable from baseline through cycle 13; only constipation showed an average of 10.0-point worsening at only cycle 4. Mean EQ VAS scores were sustained from baseline to cycle 13 (mean change ranging -1.8 to +4.8 across cycles), with values maintained within the population norm range from across 20 countries. Conclusions: Quality of life data from the phase 2 FOENIX-CCA2 trial show that physical, cognitive and emotional functioning, and overall health status were maintained among pts with advanced iCCA receiving futibatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02052778. [Table: see text]

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With PIK3CA-Mutated Hormone Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer From SOLAR-1

PURPOSE In the phase III SOLAR-1 trial ( NCT02437318 ), the PI3Kα-selective inhibitor and degrader alpelisib significantly improved median progression-free survival when added to fulvestrant in patients with phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha ( PIK3CA)–mutated, hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer. We assessed health-related quality of life using patient-reported outcome measures in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the PIK3CA-mutant cohort, 341 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive alpelisib 300 mg daily or placebo plus fulvestrant 500 mg on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL of Cancer Patients and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form questionnaires. Changes from baseline and time to 10% deterioration were analyzed using repeated measurement models and Cox models, respectively. RESULTS Global Health Status/QoL and functional status were maintained from baseline (mean changes < 10 points) in the alpelisib (overall change from baseline [95% CI], −3.50 [−8.02 to 1.02]) and placebo arms (overall change from baseline [95% CI], 0.27 [−4.48 to 5.02]). Overall treatment effect in Global Health Status/QoL was not significantly different between arms (−3.77; 95% CI, −8.35 to 0.80; P = .101). Time to 10% deterioration for Global Health Status/QoL was similar between arms (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.48). Compared with placebo, deterioration in social functioning and in diarrhea, appetite loss, nausea or vomiting, and fatigue symptom subscales occurred with alpelisib. Numerical improvement in Worst Pain was observed with alpelisib versus placebo (42% v 32%, week 24; P = .090). CONCLUSION In SOLAR-1, there was no statistical difference in deterioration of Global Health Status/QoL between arms, whereas symptom subscales favored placebo for diarrhea, appetite loss, nausea or vomiting, and fatigue, known side effects of alpelisib. Treatment decisions must consider efficacy and tolerability; taken with clinical efficacy, these results support the benefit-risk profile of alpelisib in patients with hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer.

177Lu-PSMA-617 (LuPSMA) versus cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after docetaxel: Updated results including progression-free survival (PFS) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (TheraP ANZUP 1603).

6 Background: TheraP is a randomized phase 2 trial that showed LuPSMA significantly improved the primary endpoint of PSA≥50% reduction (66% vs. 37%) compared to cabazitaxel in men with docetaxel-treated mCRPC. We now report results on other clinical endpoints and PROs reached the pre-specified target of 170 PFS events. Methods: 200 men with mCRPC (median age 72 y, prior enza/abi 91%) and high PSMA-expression by 68Ga-PSMA-11 and no sites of FDG-positive/PSMA-negative disease, were randomly assigned (1:1) to LuPSMA (6-8.5GBq q6wk up to 6 cycles; N = 99) or cabazitaxel (20mg/m2 q3wk up to 10 cycles; N = 101). Secondary endpoints include PSA/radiologic PFS (PCWG3), pain response (≥2 point reduction on McGill-Melzack Present Pain Intensity scale, objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST 1.1), adverse events (CTCAE), PROs (EORTC QLQ-C30) and overall survival (OS). Cut-off date for analysis of 20JUL20. Results: At a median follow-up of 18.4 months, PFS was significantly longer in those assigned Lu-PSMA rather than cabazitaxel (rates at 1y 19% [95%CI 12-27%] vs 3% [1-9%], hazard ratio (HR) 0.63, 95%CI 0.46-0.86; p = 0.003; 173 events). Similar benefit was seen for rPFS (HR 0.64, 95%CI 0.46-0.88; p = 0.007; 160 events) and PSA-PFS (HR 0.60 95%CI 0.44-0.83; p = 0.002; 172 events). ORR in 78 men with measurable disease was significantly greater in the LuPSMA arm (49% vs 24%, RR 2.1, 95%CI 1.1-4.1; p = 0.019). In 90 men with pain at baseline, pain responses occurred in 60% in the Lu-PSMA arm vs 43% for cabazitaxel (RR 1.42, 95%CI 0.84-4.48; p = 0.10). Patient-reported global health status was similar (LuPSMA 64 [95%CI 61-67] vs cabazitaxel 60 [57-64]) with significantly better outcomes reported for fatigue (34 [95%CI 31-37] vs 40 [36-43]), social functioning (79 [76-82] vs 73 [69-77]), insomnia (24 [20-27] vs 29 [25-33]) and diarrhoea (8.3 [5.6-11.0] vs 15.6 [12.6-18.6]) domains. No PRO domains were superior for cabazitaxel. G3-4 AEs were similar to previously reported (33% vs 53%). OS data remains immature (90 deaths). Conclusions: In men with docetaxel-treated mCRPC, LuPSMA is a promising alternative to cabazitaxel with significantly higher activity (PSA≥50%, PFS, ORR), fewer G3-4 AEs, similar effects on global health status, and improvements in some PRO domains. Clinical trial information: NCT03392428.

Quality of life of patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy in hospitals in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil: does individual characteristics matter?

This study aims to evaluate changes in quality of life of cancer patients at the beginning of the first and the second cycle of chemotherapy (CT) in hospitals in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Longitudinal, prospective, descriptive study with a quantitative approach. We enrolled 230 patients, from a broader cohort, diagnosed with the five most frequent types of cancer (breast, colorectal, cervical, lung, and head and neck), aged 18 years or older, who were initiating CT for the first time. quality of life was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3, applied at the beginning of the first and second chemotherapy cycle. The paired Wilcoxon test was used to identify differences in quality of life between the two time points. A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed using the bootstrap method to investigate potential predictors of global health Status/quality of life. There was a significant increase in patients’ emotional function scores (p < 0.001) as well as symptom scores for pain (p = 0.026), diarrhea (p = 0.018), and nausea/vomiting (p < 0.001) after initiation of CT. Widowhood was associated with improvements in the global health Status/quality of life (p = 0.028), whereas the presence of cervical cancer (p = 0.034) and being underweight (p = 0.033) were related to poorer global health status/quality of life scores. CT has detrimental effects on patients’ physical health but, on the other hand, it leads to improvements in the emotional domain. Patients’ individual characteristics at the beginning of CT are associated with changes in their quality of life. Our study could help identify these characteristics.

The Effect of Chemotherapy on Quality of Life of the Patients with Metastatic Gastric and Colorectal Cancer

Objective: The self-administered questionnaires by the patients are among the most important methods to evaluate the patient’s health related quality of life. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy on quality of life of the patients receiving palliative chemotherapy with the diagnosis of metastatic gastric and colorectal cancer by using EORTC QLQ-C30. Methods: This study included 100 patients who were treated with palliative chemotherapy for the diagnosis of metastatic gastric or colorectal cancer in İzmir Tepecik Education and Research Hospital Department of Medical Oncology between 2011-2012. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was filled twice by the patients before chemoterapy started and after chemotherapy completed. Results: When the two questionnaires were compared, it was found that global health status and physical functioning did not change after the chemotherapy. Role functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning impaired but emotional functioning improved (p<0.05). After the chemoterapy, scores of fatigue and constipation decreased but financial difficulties increased (p<0.05). The symptom scores of nausea-vomitting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, anorexia, diarrhea did not change. Conclusion: The results of this study suggested that a quality of life assessment with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire would be beneficial in patients with metastatic gastric and colorectal cancer. In this way, impairments in functional scores, global health status and symptom scores that may occur after chemotherapy can be detected, clinicians can be helped to decide on the switch to chemotherapy regimens that are similar in effectiveness but have different side effects profile, the patients’ quality of life can be improved as a result of the application of the necessary palliative treatments.