Lack Of Clinical Benefit For Routine Surveillance Imaging For Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma In First Complete Remission

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4303-4303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie M Vose ◽  
Ravi Pingali ◽  
Nina Wagner-Johnson ◽  
Fausto R. Loberiza ◽  
Timothy S. Fenske ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Routine Surveillance ◽  
Surveillance Imaging ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
First Complete Remission

Abstract Background The use of routine surveillance imaging (RSI) for patients in first complete remission (CR1) following front-line rituximab (R) based anthracycline therapy remains controversial. We compared patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who received an R-CHOP or a similar regimen, obtained a CR and then were followed by either RSI or clinical surveillance (CS) in which scans were only performed for signs or symptoms. Methods Patients from three tertiary care center from 2001-2011, who achieved a CR1 with frontline R-CHOP or similar therapy for DLBCL, and had a minimum follow up of 1 year were analyzed. Patients with HIV-related lymphoma, transformed lymphoma, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders were excluded. Patients with composite lymphoma were included only if the DLBCL component was >50%. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the surveillance strategy employed. Baseline patient characteristics, prognostic features, treatment type, and outcomes were compared. Results 391 patients with DLBCL treated with R-CHOP or similar regimens who obtained CR1 were analyzed. There were 129 patients in the CS group and 262 in the RSI group. Patient characteristics (age, gender, stage, and IPI) were similar in the two groups. The median follow up is 5 years (range 1 – 12). Relapse after CR1 was detected in 26 (20%) of patients in the CS group and 46 (18%) of the RSI group. The median number of images in the CS group was 0 (range 0-14) and 4 (range 1-27) in the RSI group, p<0.0001. The median average number of images per year of follow up in the CS group was 0 (range 0-6) and 1 (range 1-13) in the RSI group, p<0.0001. Relapses were detected through clinical manifestations in 100 % of CS cases versus 43% in RSI cases, p=0.01. The 5 year progression-free survival (PFS) was 76% in the CS group and 82 % in the RSI group (p = 0.31). The 5 year overall survival (OS) was 87% in the CS group and 92 % in the RSI group (p=0.15). The table shows an analysis of OS by IPI and type of surveillance. Conclusions The majority of relapses in patients with DLBCL after achieving CR1 to an R-CHOP or similar regimen occur when signs or symptoms of the disease lead to evaluation and are not detected by RSI. Although asymptomatic relapses are occasionally detected by RSI, in this large cohort of patients neither a PFS nor OS benefit could be demonstrated in favor of RSI. Given the additional cost, radiation exposure and risk of additional procedures, we conclude that the use of RSI in patients with DLBCL in CR1 has limited clinical utility. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Routine Imaging for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in First Complete Remission Does Not Improve Post-Treatment Survival: A Danish–Swedish Population-Based Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (34) ◽  
pp. 3993-3998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly ◽  
Lasse Hjort Jakobsen ◽  
Martin Hutchings ◽  
Peter de Nully Brown ◽  
Herman Nilsson-Ehle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Routine Imaging ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
First Complete Remission

Purpose Routine imaging for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in first complete remission (CR) is controversial and plays a limited role in detecting relapse. This population-based study compared the survival of Danish and Swedish patients with DLBCL for whom traditions for routine imaging have been different. Patients and Methods Patients from the Danish and Swedish lymphoma registries were included according to the following criteria: newly diagnosed DLBCL from 2007 to 2012, age 18 to 65 years, and CR after R-CHOP/CHOEP. Follow-up for Swedish patients included symptom assessment, clinical examinations, and blood tests at 3- to 4-month intervals for 2 years, with longer intervals later in follow-up. Imaging was only recommended when relapse was clinically suspected. Follow-up for Danish patients was similar but included routine imaging (usually computed tomography every 6 months for 2 years). Results Danish (n = 525) and Swedish (n = 696) patients with DLBCL had comparable baseline characteristics. Cumulative 2-year progression rate after CR was 6% (95% CI, 4 to 9) for International Prognostic Index (IPI) ≤ 2 versus 21% (95% CI, 13 to 28) for IPI > 2. Age > 60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6 to 3.4), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.8), B symptoms (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.5), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥ 2 (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.0) were associated with worse post-CR survival. Imaging-based follow-up strategy had no impact on survival, neither for all patients nor for IPI-specific subgroups. Conclusion DLBCL relapse after first CR is infrequent, and the widespread use of routine imaging in Denmark did not translate into better survival. This favors follow-up without routine imaging and, more generally, a shift of focus from relapse detection to improved survivorship.

scholarly journals Twenty Years of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Single Portuguese Center Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 205
Author(s):  
Margarida Dantas Brito ◽  
Fernando Campilho ◽  
Rosa Branca ◽  
Carlos Vaz ◽  
Susana Roncon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell ◽  
First Complete Remission

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma can be cured in 60% – 70% of patients. Autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard treatment for relapsed disease. This high-intensity treatment after first complete remission in patients with high International Prognostic Index remains controversial and was performed in our department during some years. <br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> Retrospective study, review of clinical records. <br /><strong>Results:</strong> This study evaluates the outcome of 113 patients transplanted between 1992 and 2012. Considering status before transplantation patients were divided in groups: a) first complete remission after 1 line of chemotherapy (n = 64); b) first complete remission after ≥ two chemotherapy lines (n = 15); c) second complete remission (n = 15); d) more advanced diseased (n = 19). Chemotherapy used in first line therapy was mainly R-CHOP (n = 71) and CHOP (n = 28). The median follow-up of patients still alive was 34 months (1 - 221). At five years, overall survival was 73% (± 5) and disease free survival was 75% (± 5).<br /><strong>Conclusion:</strong> Conventional chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant is a safe and efficient option for selected patients. In our series 70% high-risk patients were free from disease with this strategy.</p>

scholarly journals Utility of Routine Post-Therapy Surveillance Imaging in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31) ◽  
pp. 3506-3512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carrie A. Thompson ◽  
Herve Ghesquieres ◽  
Matthew J. Maurer ◽  
James R. Cerhan ◽  
Pierre Biron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
The United States ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Surveillance Imaging ◽  
Post Therapy ◽  
Large B Cell

Purpose We examined the utility of post-therapy surveillance imaging in a large, prospectively enrolled cohort of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) from the United States and confirmed our results in an independent cohort of patients from France. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and treated with anthracycline-based immunochemotherapy were identified from the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence and the Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France. In those with relapse, details at relapse and outcomes were abstracted from records. Results 680 individuals with DLBCL were identified from the MER, 552 (81%) of whom achieved remission after induction. 112 of the 552 patients (20%) suffered a relapse. The majority (64%) of relapses were identified before a scheduled follow-up visit. Surveillance imaging detected DLBCL relapse before clinical manifestations in nine out of 552 patients (1.6%) observed after therapy. In the Lyon cohort, imaging identified asymptomatic DLBCL relapse in four out of 222 patients (1.8%). There was no difference in survival after DLBCL relapse in patients detected at scheduled follow-up versus before scheduled follow-up in both the MER (P = .56) and Lyon cohorts (P = .25). Conclusion The majority of DLBCL relapses are detected outside of planned follow-up, with no difference in outcome in patients with DLBCL detected at a scheduled visit compared with patients with relapse detected outside of planned follow-up. These data do not support the use of routine surveillance imaging for follow-up of DLBCL.

Prospective Management of Primary Testicular Lymphoma (PTL) with Doxorubicin-Based Chemotherapy, Prophylactic Intrathecal (IT) Methotrexate and Radiotherapy (RT), but without Rituximab: Results from IELSG.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2454-2454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas H. Sarris ◽  
Umberto Vitolo ◽  
Emanuele Zucca ◽  
George Z. Rassidakis ◽  
Jeffrey Medeiros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Contralateral Testis ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Frequent Relapses ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Introduction: PTL is a rare extranodal lymphoma characterized by a continuous pattern of systemic relapses in spite of doxorubicin-based therapy. There are also frequent relapses in the contralateral testis and the central nervous system (CNS). Therefore we decided to determine whether prophylaxis of the CNS and the contralateral testis would modify the pattern of relapse of PTL. Patients and methods: From 1993 to February 2002 in IELSG member institutions patients with PTL (presenting with testicular enlargement) were managed with doxorubicin-based therapy according to institutional policy, with the addition of four doses of IT methotrexate (15 mg) during the first 6 weeks. At the end of chemotherapy scrotal RT (30 Gy) was given to all patients and 30–36 Gy nodal RT to those with stage II disease. Rituximab was not used in this cohort because it was not yet generally available for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Results: There were twenty seven patients; two refused chemotherapy and/or RT/IT therapy and one RT, leaving 24 eligible for analysis. Median age was 60 years (range 31–80). Ann Arbor stage was I in 17, II in four, and four in three patients. B-symptoms were present in one patient. The right testis was involved in 13 and the left in 11 patients. Serum LDH was elevated in four of 21 with available values. No patient had CNS involvement at diagnosis. Pathology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in all patients. Treatment was CHOP in 21, alternating triple therapy in two, and hyper-CVAD in one patient. Three patients died during therapy: one from neutropenic sepsis and two from toxicity of systemic methotrexate. The remaining 21 patients achieved a complete remission. With a median follow-up of 57 months (range 8–123) for survivors, seven patients have relapsed, three in the CNS. There were no testicular relapses. Eight patients have died: three from toxicity during induction, three from relapsed lymphoma, one from gastric carcinoma and one from sudden death, both in complete remission. At 5 years the projected progression-free survival was 78%, and survival 66%, but both without an apparent plateau. Freedom from progression in the CNS was 84%, with a plateau. Conclusions: Patients with PTL treated prospectively with doxorubicin-based therapy before the availability of rituximab exhibit the continuous pattern of relapse previously reported. Scrotal RT seems eliminate testicular relapses, and prophylactic IT methotrexate seems to reduce, but not eliminated CNS relapses. These need to be confirmed by longer follow-up. The ongoing IELSG-10 should determine whether the addition of rituximab alters the continuous pattern of systemic relapses. Future studies should determine the molecular basis of the continuous relapses and minimize both systemic and CNS relapses.

Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab Plus Bendamustine in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3074-3074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalisa Arcari ◽  
Annalisa Chiappella ◽  
Vanessa Valenti ◽  
Luca Zanlari ◽  
Monica Tani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Remission ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Extranodal Involvement ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Stage Disease ◽  
Poor Functional Status ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapsed or refractory after chemoimmunotherapy have dismal prognosis; the standard salvage treatment is Rituximab plus high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (R-HDC). However, no standardized treatment is available for patients not eligible for R-HDC because of age and/or comorbidity. The combination Rituximab plus Bendamustine (R-B) has shown to be non-inferior and with a favorable toxicity profile compared to R-CHOP in indolent B-cell lymphoma. The use of R-B in DLBCL is a matter of debate. Purpose: We designed an Italian multicenter retrospective study aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of R-B as salvage treatment in patients with DLBCL relapsed or refractory after at least one complete course of Rituximab-chemotherapy, who were not eligible for R-HDC because of age and/or comorbidity or in patients with post-HDC recurrence. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reported 43 unselected consecutive patients with relapsed or refractory DLCBL treated with R-B in 15 Italian haematological centers between October 2008 and January 2014. Schedule of R-B were: 6 courses of Bendamustine at 90 mg/mq or 70 mg/mq on days 1 and 2 of each 28-day cycle and Rituximab 375 mg/mq on day 1 of each cycle. They were analyzed for baseline characteristics (age, IPI, ECOG, comorbidity), outcome (ORR, PFS, OS) and toxicity (CTCAE). Results: The median age was 76 years (range 56-94). Eighty-three % of patients had advanced-stage disease (III-IV stage) and 67% had IPI score of ≥3. An extranodal involvement was present in 65% of cases (bone marrow, lung, stomach, skin, pleura, pericardium). More than half the patients (51%) presented with poor functional status with ECOG score of ≥2. Comorbidity assessment by CIRS-G revelead 30% of patients with ≥1 severely or very severely (level 3 or 4) affected organs and 27% of patients with moderate or severe (level ≥2) cardiopathy. The mean number of prior therapies was 1,7 (range 1-3). All patients were previously treated with Rituximab-chemotherapy and three patients had already received R-HDC. Twelve patients had a refractory disease and 31 experienced relapse after last treatment. Patients received a median of 5 cycles of planned 6 courses of R-B (range 2-6); 24 patients underwent Bendamustine at 90 mg/mq, 19 at 70 mg/mq. All patients received Rituximab 375 mg/mq. In 38% of patients treatment was stopped because of progression; in 4 patients (9%) progression occurred within the first 2 treatment cycles. The overall response rate was 47%, including 28% complete remission and 19% partial remission. One patient in partial remission after R-B achieved a complete remission after local radiotherapy. The median OS was 16 months (95% CI 10-20). The median PFS was 8 months (95% CI 6-11). The median follow up was 10 months (range 2-60). Nine patients are still alive and in complete remission at last follow up; 7 of these patients had a chemosensitive relapse before R-B (in 5 cases a first relapse) and only 2 had a refractory disease with progression after a previous lenalidomide treatment. Toxicity was moderate, mainly grade 1 and 2. Grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia in 14 patients (32%), thrombocytopenia in 5 patients (11%), anemia in one patient, infections in 3 patients (6%), skin rash in one patient, nausea in one patient, diarrhea in one patient. One patient died of septic shock after the third R-B cycle. One patient died of miocardial infarction related to underlying cardiac comorbidity. Conclusions: Bendamustine in combination with Rituximab showed promising efficacy results with a low toxicity profile in a poor prognosis population (advanced stage disease and extranodal involvement, high median age, poor functional status, comorbidities), not eligible for R-HDC. The optimal dosage and schedule of Bendamustine and/or combination with novel drugs should be further investigated, in order to improve the duration of response and reduce the rate of early progression. Disclosures Off Label Use: Bendamustine in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Marasca:Mundipharma: Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document