scholarly journals No Increased Risk of Secondary Neoplasms in Patients Treated with Rituximab for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma : A Meta-Analysis of 9 Trials

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1659-1659
Author(s):  
Isabelle Fleury ◽  
Sylvie Chevret ◽  
Michael Pfreundschuh ◽  
Gilles Salles ◽  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Secondary Neoplasms ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
American Society

Abstract Background. Rituximab improved outcomes of all CD20+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes. Rituximab induces a transient B-cell depletion and a dose-dependent T-cell inactivation (Stroopinsky et al., Cancer Immunol Immunother 2012) predisposing to T-cell dependent infections and to a potential impaired T-cell immunosurveillance. Secondary neoplasms (SN) is infrequent in trials including rituximab and the SN risk associated to rituximab across multiple trials has not been reported. We performed a systematic review of published trials comparing chemotherapy with or without rituximab to evaluate SN occurrence. Methods. Our primary endpoint was SN risk in patients with NHL treated with rituximab. We searched PubMed and Embase databases for randomised controlled trials on rituximab and lymphoma where rituximab constituted the only difference between treatment arms and where SN incidence or SN related death were reported. Authors were contacted for SN related rituximab exposure if not detailed. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and HIV-related lymphomas were excluded due to increased risk of SN. Updated follow-up of eligible trials presented at annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society of Hematology were retrieved. Data were extracted independently by two authors. A random effects DerSimonian-Laird meta-analysis was performed to estimate the summary effect of rituximab on the hazard of SN. Statistical heterogeneity was tested using Woolf test. Results. We identified nine trials cumulating 4621 patients with 2312 exposed to rituximab and 2309 not exposed. These nine trials are known with the following names: PRIMA (1), GELA LNH98.5 (2), MINT (3), CORAL (4), IELSG-19 (5), EORTC20981 (6), OSHO#39 (7), SAKK 35/98 (8), RICOVER60 (9). Histology were diffuse large B cell (n=4), follicular (n=4) and marginal zone (n=1) lymphomas. Median age was 58.1 years. Sex distribution was available for seven trials with 1650 (47.6%) women and 1814 (52.4%) men. In all these trials but one (SAKK 35/98), rituximab was used associated with chemotherapy: CHOP, CHOEP, FCM, MCP, DHAP, ICE, or chlorambucil. At a median follow-up of 73 months [interquartile range: 72-84], a total of 334 SN was observed, including 169 SN in patients randomised to rituximab as compared to 165 SN in patients not randomised to rituximab (OR= 0.88; 95%CI: 0.66-1.19) (Figure 1). No evidence of significant heterogeneity was noticed across trials (p = 0.93). Notably, the proportion of females, histology subtypes, use of rituximab in first line, and use of rituximab over prolonged periods in maintenance did not influence SN risk (p = 0.94, p = 0.80, p = 0.87, p = 0.87 respectively). The SN risk was not increased in protocols administrating rituximab over periods of 8 months to 12 months (CORAL , OSHO#39) as opposed to periods of 24 months (PRIMA, EORTC20981) (p=0.86). Conclusions. This meta-analysis of nine trials randomising rituximab in NHL patients suggests no SN predisposition at a median follow-up of 6 years. SN risk associated with the combination of rituximab and new targeted therapies warrants prospective monitoring. Figure 1. Standard meta-analysis plot of the odds ratio of SN prevalence in the rituximab arm compared to the control arm Figure 1. Standard meta-analysis plot of the odds ratio of SN prevalence in the rituximab arm compared to the control arm Disclosures Fleury: Lundbeck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Preceptorship Other. Pfreundschuh:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding. Salles:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. van Oers:Roche: Consultancy. Gisselbrecht:Roche: Research Funding. Zucca:Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Herold:Roche Pharma AG/Germany: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ghielmini:Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Pre-CAR Blinatumomab Is Associated with Increased Post-CD19 CAR Relapse and Decreased Event Free Survival

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 13-14
Author(s):  
Agne Taraseviciute ◽  
Seth M. Steinberg ◽  
Regina M. Myers ◽  
Lia Gore ◽  
Adam J. Lamble ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Car T Cell ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Car T ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Cd19 Expression

Introduction: Both CD19 CAR T-cells (CD19 CAR) and blinatumomab (blina) effectively induce remission in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (r/r ALL). However, blina use prior to CD19 CAR has raised concerns for increased relapse risk and/or CAR non-response due to selective pressure on CD19. The tisagenlecleucel registration trial in pediatric ALL excluded patients who had received prior blina. Thus, there is limited data regarding the impact of blina on long-term outcomes in patients receiving subsequent CD19 CAR. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study was performed to evaluate the impact of pre-CAR blina on subsequent CD19 CAR outcomes in pediatric and young adult patients with r/r ALL < 25 years at diagnosis. The primary objective was to evaluate relapse (RFS) and event free survival (EFS) at 6 months following CD19 CAR stratified by blina use. Secondary objectives included: evaluation of RFS at 12 months and response to CD19 CAR. All patients had their first CAR T-cell infusion between the years 2012-2019 and had at least 30 days of follow-up (or an event prior to 30 days). Descriptive statistics were used for baseline demographics and comparison between cohorts. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate survival. Results: A total of 420 patients from 7 centers received 1 of 3 CD19 CAR T-cell constructs. (Table 1) The median age at diagnosis and at CAR infusion was 7.1 years and 12.4 years, respectively (range, 0.6-30 years). Amongst 412 patients evaluable for response, a total of 375 (91.0%) patients achieved a complete remission (CR); 363 (96.8%) of whom were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative (by flow cytometry). Thirty-seven (9.0%) of evaluable patients were CD19 CAR non-responders. With a median potential follow-up of 2.3 years (IQR, 1.6-3.3 years), 164 (43.7%) patients experienced relapse. Seventy-five (17.8%) patients received blina prior to CD19 CAR. The median time from last blina use to CD19 CAR was 129 days (IQR, 79-304 days). Blina was associated with an increased risk of CAR non-response; 13/71 (18.3%) blina patients versus 24/341 (7.0%) non-blina patients were non-responders (p=0.0052). Ten of 71 (14.1%) were non-responders to both CD19 CAR and blina; 19 of 29 (66%) blina non-responders achieved remission with subsequent CD19 CAR. Baseline disease status did not differ between blina and non-blina patients at CAR T-cell infusion, although a higher fraction of blina patients harbored KMT2Ar cytogenetics (11/75 (14.7%) versus 22/345 (6.4%), p=0.03). Pre-CAR blina was associated with worse EFS and RFS, but not overall survival (OS). The 6-month RFS for blina and non-blina patients was 63.4% (95% CI, 49.6-74.4%) and 81.1% (95% CI, 76.3-85.0%), respectively (Figure 1A). The 6-month EFS for blina and non-blina patients was 49.7% (95% CI, 37.8-60.5%) and 72.1% (95% CI, 67.1-76.6%), respectively (Figure 1B). Analysis excluding KMT2Ar patients to evaluate for the possibility that these patients represented a higher-risk subgroup and could skew the data, revealed similar EFS and RFS. Amongst 408 patients with pre-CAR CD19 analysis, 6/69 (13.0%) of blina patients versus 21/339 (6.2%) of non-blina patients had CD19 dim/partial/negative disease (p=0.07). Serial CD19 evaluation pre/post blina revealed that 6/52 (11.5%) had CD19 evolution to dim expression. Conclusions: This large, multicenter analysis demonstrate an association with blina use and 1) increased risk of CAR non-response; 2) worse RFS and EFS and 3) a trend towards a higher incidence of pre-CAR CD19 dim disease. While blina non-response did not preclude CD19 CAR response, blina non-responders had lower remission rates to CD19 CAR and a cohort of patients were refractory to both, potentially suggesting resistance to immunotherapeutic CD19 targeting. Additionally, we found that blina may impact CD19 expression, which could subsequently affect response and relapse. Mechanisms of resistance to CD19 CAR include antigen escape or an inherent resistance to T-cell mediated killing. Our data suggest that 1) patients relapsing after or refractory to blina who proceed to CD19 CAR may have an inherent resistance and 2) blina may impact CD19 expression. Ongoing analysis includes detailed analysis of low/dim/partial CD19 expression to delineate the potential impact of blina exposure on leukemic blasts and evaluation of the role of HSCT. Disclosures Gore: Amgen, Novartis, Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Brown:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laetsch:Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellectis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gardner:Novartis: Honoraria. Rheingold:Pfizer: Research Funding. Pulsipher:Mesoblast: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Adaptive: Research Funding; Miltenyi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bellicum: Honoraria; Jasper: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Real-World Outcomes for Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Treated with Tisagenlecleucel: Update from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Registry

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 428-428
Author(s):  
Samuel John ◽  
Michael A. Pulsipher ◽  
Amy Moskop ◽  
Zhen-Huan Hu ◽  
Christine L. Phillips ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Advisory Boards

Abstract Background: Tisagenlecleucel is an autologous CD19-directed T-cell immunotherapy indicated in the USA for treatment of patients up to 25 years (y) of age with B-cell ALL that is refractory or in second or later relapse. Overall response rate was 82% with 24 months' (mo) follow-up in the registrational ELIANA trial [Grupp et al. Blood 2018]; pooled data from ELIANA and ENSIGN revealed similar outcomes upon stratification by age (<18y and ≥18y) [Rives et al. HemaSphere 2018]. Early real-world data for tisagenlecleucel from the CIBMTR registry reported similar efficacy to ELIANA with no new safety signals [Pasquini et al. Blood Adv 2020]. Outcomes are reported here for patients who received tisagenlecleucel in the real-world setting, stratified by age (<18y and ≥18y). Methods: This noninterventional prospective study used data from the CIBMTR registry and included patients aged ≤25y with R/R ALL. Eligible patients received commercial tisagenlecleucel after August 30, 2017, in the USA or Canada. Age-specific analyses were conducted in patients aged <18y and ≥18y at the time of infusion. Efficacy was assessed in patients with ≥12mo follow-up at each reporting center and included best overall response (BOR) of complete remission (CR), duration of response (DOR), event-free survival (EFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety was evaluated in all patients who completed the first (100-day) assessment. Adverse events (AEs) of interest - including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity - were monitored throughout the reporting period. CRS and neurotoxicity were graded using the ASTCT criteria. Results: As of October 30, 2020, data from 451 patients were collected, all of whom received tisagenlecleucel. The median time from receipt of leukapheresis product at the manufacturing site to shipment was 27 days (interquartile range: 25-34). Patients aged ≥18y appeared to have greater disease burden at baseline than those aged <18y, indicated by lower rates of morphologic CR and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity prior to infusion. Older patients were also more heavily pre-treated before infusion. All other patient characteristics at baseline were comparable between the two groups (Table 1). In the efficacy set (median follow-up 21.5mo; range 11.9-37.2; N=322), BOR of CR was 87.3% (95% CI 83.1-90.7); MRD status was available for 150 patients, of whom 98.7% were MRD negative. Median DOR was 23.9mo (95% CI 12.3-not estimable [NE]), median EFS was 14.0mo (9.8-24.8) and median RFS was 23.9mo (13.0-NE); 12mo EFS and RFS were 54.3% and 62.3%, respectively. For OS, the median was not reached. Efficacy outcomes were generally similar across age groups (Table 1). In the safety set (median follow-up 20.0mo; range 2.6-37.2; N=400), most AEs of interest occurred within 100 days of infusion. Any-grade CRS was observed in 58.0% of patients; Grade ≥3 in 17.8%. Treatment for CRS included tocilizumab (n=113; 28.3% of all patients) and corticosteroids (n=31; 7.8%). Neurotoxicity was observed in 27.3% of patients; Grade ≥3 in 10.0%. Treatment for neurotoxicity included tocilizumab (n=17; 4.3% of all patients) and corticosteroids (n=28; 7.0%). During the reporting period, 82 (20.5%) patients died; the most common cause of death was recurrence/persistence/progression of primary disease. CRS and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome were the primary cause of death in 2 patients and 1 patient, respectively. Overall, safety data were similar across age groups, although more patients aged ≥18y experienced any-grade CRS or neurotoxicity and were subsequently treated (Table 1). Conclusions: Updated registry data for pediatric and young adult patients with R/R ALL treated with tisagenlecleucel revealed that patients aged ≥18y had a greater disease burden and were more heavily pre-treated at baseline than patients aged <18y. The overall efficacy and safety profiles of commercial tisagenlecleucel reflected those observed in the clinical trial setting [Grupp et al. Blood 2018; Rives et al. HemaSphere 2018] and were broadly consistent across age groups. Some important differences between the <18y and ≥18y groups were identified, which may point to challenges in timely identification and/or referral of older patients for CAR-T cell therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Pulsipher: Equillium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Research Funding; Jasper Therapeutics: Honoraria. Hu: Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Phillips: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Margossian: Cue Biopharma, Inc.: Current Employment; Novartis: Other: Ad hoc Advisory Boards. Nikiforow: Kite/Gilead: Other: Ad hoc advisory boards; Novartis: Other: Ad hoc advisory boards; Iovance: Other: Ad hoc advisory boards; GlaxoSmithKline (GSK): Other: Ad hoc advisory boards. Martin: Novartis: Other: Local PI for clinical trial; Bluebird Bio: Other: Local PI for clinical trial. Rouce: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tessa Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Tiwari: Novartis Healthcare private limited: Current Employment. Redondo: Novartis: Current Employment. Willert: Novartis: Current Employment. Agarwal: Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Pasquini: Kite Pharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Grupp: Novartis, Roche, GSK, Humanigen, CBMG, Eureka, and Janssen/JnJ: Consultancy; Novartis, Kite, Vertex, and Servier: Research Funding; Novartis, Adaptimmune, TCR2, Cellectis, Juno, Vertex, Allogene and Cabaletta: Other: Study steering committees or scientific advisory boards; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Steering committee, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Hospitalization Patterns with Commercial CAR T-Cell Therapy: A Single Institution Experience

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3240-3240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunita Dwivedy Nasta ◽  
Esin C. Namoglu ◽  
Mitchell E. Hughes ◽  
Elise A. Chong ◽  
Jakub Svoboda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Mental Status ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Altered Mental Status ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
T Cell Therapy ◽  
Car T

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) is a revolutionary adoptive immunotherapy approach in lymphoma; however, there are substantial costs associated with CAR-T therapy. The current practice of admission for tisa-cel infusion and subsequent monitoring may contribute to these costs. Generally, our institution administers tisa-cel in the outpatient setting (Schuster NEJM 2017), and we now report our clinical approach and analyze the frequency of hospitalization post outpatient tisa-cel infusion with in the first 30 days of infusion. Patients and Methods: We conducted a single institution, retrospective study investigating hospitalization after CAR-T of adult lymphoma patients treated with commercial tisa-cel at the University of Pennsylvania between 6/2018 and 7/2019. Data collected included number and timing of hospitalizations, symptoms leading to hospitalization, diagnosis during hospitalization, and length of stay. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had at least 30 days of follow-up after tisa-cel or hospitalization within the first 30 days after tisa-cel. Patients were followed for hospitalization events until progression of lymphoma. Admissions for elective surgical procedures were not included in hospitalization count. Patients received lymphodepleting therapy as an outpatient, followed by evaluation in clinic and outpatient infusion of tisa-cel. Indications for hospitalization at our institution included bulky disease, suboptimal organ function at time of tisa-cel infusion, or progressive lymphoma symptoms requiring inpatient management. After infusion, patients returned for follow-up on day 2 and day 4, then weekly starting day 8 through day 30 for physical examination, labs, and assessment for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Patients were instructed to contact our clinic with fever > 100.4F, any change in mental status, or for malaise. Patients were also required to stay within 1 hour driving distance of our clinic and have identified a caregiver who will remain with them for the first 28 days. Results: 30 patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma who received commercial tisa-cel were identified; 28 (93%) patients received outpatient tisa-cel; two pts were admitted at the time of T-cell infusion due to progressive lymphoma symptoms requiring urgent management. The length of stay for the two patients who received inpatient tisa-cel was 17.5 days (17-18). Nine of 28 patients were admitted after tisa-cel infusion a median of 5 days after tisa-cel infusion (range: day +1 to +7). No patient required a second admission within 30 days. In most instances, 8/9 (89%) patients were referred for fever (fever range: 99.6F-102.0F) and one patient was referred for altered mental status. Of those hospitalized with fever, 5/8 (63%) patients had CRS and 3/8 (37%) patients had an infection. The patient with altered mental status was diagnosed with grade 3 neurotoxicity. One of the admitted patients died during hospitalization; however, this was due to progression of lymphoma after initial admission for an infection. There were no deaths due to tisa-cel related toxicity. Conclusion: Our experience suggests that treatment with tisa-cel in the outpatient setting is safe and feasible with close supervision and adequate institutional experience. After infusion, most admissions within the first 30 days were triggered by fever and the etiology of fever was either CRS or infection. Admission diagnoses matched prior experience with tisa-cel as previously reported. Disclosures Dwivedy Nasta: Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Aileron: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Rafael: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ATARA: Research Funding; Debiopharm: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; 47 (Forty Seven): Research Funding. Hughes:Acerta Pharna/HOPA: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chong:Novartis: Consultancy; Tessa: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding. Svoboda:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Landsburg:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Curis, INC: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barta:Celgene: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Gerson:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Ruella:Nanostring: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Patents & Royalties: CART for cancer; AbClon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Frey:Novartis: Research Funding. Schuster:Novartis: Other: a patent (with royalties paid to Novartis) on combination therapies of CAR and PD-1 inhibitors.; Novartis, Nordic Nanovector, and Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis, Celgene, Genentech, Merck, Pharmacyclics, Acerta, and Gilead: Other: Grants, Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Loxo Oncology, Acerta, and Celgene: Honoraria. Porter:Wiley and Sons: Honoraria; Immunovative: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; American Board of Internal Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Employment; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Glenmark Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Leukemias: A Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4805-4805
Author(s):  
Madeline Waldron ◽  
Caitlin Siebenaller ◽  
Brian P. Hobbs ◽  
Marc Earl ◽  
Mary Schleicher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Increase In Risk

Abstract Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients (pts). The risk of VTE, however, differs according to cancer type. Pts with hematologic malignancies are at an increased risk of VTE events, either due to the underlying disease biology or related to treatment. This risk exists even in acute leukemia (AL), which is characterized by profound thrombocytopenia and coagulopathies that present treatment challenges. Advances in anti-leukemic therapies and improved supportive care over the last several decades may have impacted the extent to which an average patient is at risk for VTE We performed a meta-analysis of published literature on VTE rates in AL pts and evaluated trends in VTE incidence in relation to the reported study time period. Methods: This meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Scopus and Cochran databases to identify relevant studies published between January 1980 and June 2018. All studies including randomized controlled, retrospective or observational studies in AL pts which investigated VTE as an endpoint were included. Abstracts, posters, review articles, and case reports were excluded. Articles were excluded if they did not provide disease-level data. The search terms included "venous thromboembolism", "deep venous thrombosis", "pulmonary embolism", and "leukemia". Furthermore, citations were supplemented by cross checking the reference lists of eligible studies and relevant reviews to identify additional published data. We collected study period, study design, study publication date, AL subtype, total patients, and rates of VTE. When reported, we collected information on VTE prophylaxis and presence of central lines. Meta-analysis of VTE rates was performed using an established Bayesian logistic random effects model. The model assumes that the log odds of VTE is exchangeable across studies with Gaussian distribution and random hierarchical mean and standard deviation. For both analyses, the hierarchical mean assumed a Gaussian prior with mean 0 and variance = 200. The inter-study standard deviation was assumed uniform (0,10). Given treatment and patient heterogeneity among distinct subtypes of AL, analyses were undertaken separately for each AL subtype. Results for individual studies and the combined inter-study mean VTE rate are described by the resultant posterior medians and 95% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals. Results: From the initial search, 2527 articles were identified. Among these, 938 were duplicate publications, 1408 did not meet content inclusion criteria, 150 were review articles or case reports, 2 studies lacked disease level data, thus, leaving 31 studies for analysis. A total of 29 studies focused on ALL, 11 on AML, 11 on APL, and some studies included multiple disease populations. The inter-study mean incidence of VTE for ALL was 8.67% (95% HPD 6.01%-11.58%), fig 1a, for AML was 7.25% (95% HPD 4.12%-11.09%), fig 1b, and for APL was 12.94% (95% HPD 7.04%-20.67%), fig 1c. .. Our graphical analysis indicates an increase in risk of VTE with time for ALL (fig 2a), AML (fig 2b), and APL (fig 2c). Conclusion: In the present meta-analysis, we determined that the overall incidence of VTE in AL pts ranged from 7-13%. Among AL subtypes, APL pts had the highest rate of VTE. We observed an increased risk of VTE over time. We postulate this is multifactorial and may be related to an increase in case findings from increased screening, aging sedentary population, and increased use of prothombotic agents. Notable strengths of this study include the largest review of association of VTE with AL and evolving risk of VTE with time. These findings need to be considered in light of several limitations - lack of comparator group limiting ability to generate pooled relative risks for VTE, heterogeneity in study populations and reporting and scare data on VTE prophylaxis. Further data are required to determine the mechanism for the increase in risk. Given the VTE risk and its known impact on morbidity, mortality and associated health care costs, prospective studies are warranted in AL pts to facilitate establishment of guidelines for prophylaxis and management of thrombotic complications. Disclosures Carraway: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; FibroGen: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Balaxa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau. Advani:Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nazha:MEI: Consultancy. Gerds:Apexx Oncology: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Sekeres:Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Systemic Mastocytosis: Management and Outcome. Data Analysis from the Greek Registry

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5463-5463
Author(s):  
Ioannis Tsonis ◽  
Nikolaos Kanellias ◽  
Vasileios Lazaris ◽  
Panayiotis Panayiotidis ◽  
Damianos Sotiropoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Systemic Mastocytosis ◽  
Cell Leukaemia ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Travel Grant

Abstract Background and Methods: Systemic Mastocytosis (SM) is a rare haematologic malignancy characterized by the abnormal growth and accumulation of neoplastic mast cells in one or more organs. The cKIT D816V mutation is a common genetic finding in most cases. A subset of patients appears to be at increased risk for mediator release related symptoms as well as organ dysfunction, including skeletal problems such as osteoporosis, osteolytic lesions and fractures. The diversity of clinical manifestations results in both delayed diagnosis and therapeutic dilemmas. SM cases diagnosed in Greece, between 1987 and 2018, are presented. This project is included in the current activities of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Working Party of Hellenic Society of Haematology for registry and research development. The medical files of the patients were retrospectively evaluated for disease characteristics, treatment and outcome. Results: Overall 59 patients, median age 52.0 years, with SM were included in the study. Median time of symptoms onset to diagnosis was two years. Twenty-one patients were categorized as indolent SM (ISM), 19 as SM with an associated haematological neoplasm (SM-AHN), 18 as aggressive SM (ASM) and one with mast cell leukaemia (MCL). The main characteristics of the disease are shown in Table 1. Several haematologic neoplasms were associated with SM. Although myeloid malignancies were the most common, including MDS or MDS/MPN (n=9), CMML (n=2), AML (n=1), CML (n=1) and ET (n=1), lymphoid malignancies were also reported and included NHL (n=3), HL (n=1) and B-ALL (n=1). SM and the AHN were diagnosed simultaneously in 12 cases. AHN diagnosis preceded the diagnosis of SM in 4 cases (median time: 22 months), while the opposite occurred in three cases (median time: 7.0 months). Most of the patients with ISM (16/21) did not receive any specific treatment. As far as the remaining five are concerned, one was treated with imatinib, one with hydroxyurea and the rest three received corticosteroids to control the mediators' related symptoms. One of the latter had diarrhoea without infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract and received consecutively Interferon alpha (IFNα), imatinib and corticosteroids without resolution of the syndrome. Eight patients with SM-AHN received treatment for both the SM and the co-existing haematological neoplasm, six only for the AHN, three only for SM, while three did not require treatment yet. The most common treatment for SM was IFNα (n=6), followed by imatinib (n=4), cladribine (2-CdA) (n=3) and dasatinib (n=1). Patients with ASM received either IFNα (n=8) or 2-CdA (n=5) as first line treatment. Second line treatment included imatinib (n=2), 2-CdA due to IFNα intolerance (n=1) and corticosteroids (n=2). Two patients with vertebrae fractures required surgical intervention. All patients with skeletal involvement received additionally biphosphonates. The patient with MCL received consecutively 2-CdA, chemotherapy (FLAG-Ida) and dasatinib achieving partial response and proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplantation. He died 6 months later due to complications related to graft versus host disease. With a median follow-up of 31 months the median overall survival in the entire cohort is not reached. The median follow-up for patients with ISM and ASM is 33.5 and 18.5 months respectively, and all of them are alive with adequate disease control. Seven deaths were reported only in the group of patients with SM-AHN. Six patients died due to acute leukaemia and one due to infection, indicating that the aggressiveness of the underlying haematological malignancy is the strongest factor that affects survival in this group. Conclusion: Systemic Mastocytosis is a rare disease with variable manifestations and outcome. Nowadays, several therapeutic modalities are available for effective disease management over time. Novel targeted therapies seem to be promising to further improve the outcome, but still early and accurate diagnosis, in accordance to WHO classification, remains important. Table 1. Table 1. Disclosures Gavriilaki: European Hematology Association: Research Funding. Terpos:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant, Patents & Royalties; Genesis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant, Patents & Royalties; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Metabolic PET/CT Analysis of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Prior to Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR-T Infusion: Predictors of Progressive Disease, Survival, and Toxicity

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2518-2518
Author(s):  
William Breen ◽  
Jason R. Young ◽  
Matthew Hathcock ◽  
Roman O. Kowalchuk ◽  
Radhika Bansal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Car T ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Purpose: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) is an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy utilized for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) refractory to at least 2 lines of therapy. F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is used to evaluate disease extent prior to CAR-T infusion at two time points: pre-leukapheresis (pre-leuk) approximately 6 weeks prior to CAR-T infusion, and pre-lymphodepletion chemotherapy (pre-LD) approximately 1 week prior to CAR-T infusion. We hypothesized that PET/CT characteristics beyond Lugano criteria, such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), SUV maximum (SUVMax), and changes in these parameters from pre-leuk to pre-LD, may predict for progressive disease (PD), death, and treatment toxicity after CAR-T infusion. Methods: Patients with NHL who received axi-cel on a prospective registry at Mayo Clinic Rochester were included. Lesions on pre-leuk and pre-LD PET/CT scans were segmented with a fixed absolute SUVMax threshold of 2.5 using a semi-automated workflow (LesionID, MIM Software Inc.) with manual modification to exclude physiologic uptake as needed. MTV, TLG, SUVMax, number of lesions, and other lesion characteristics were assessed for each PET/CT, and changes from pre-leuk to pre-LD were calculated. Lesions were categorized as either nodal, spleen, bone, parenchymal (i.e. liver, lung), or soft tissue (i.e. subcutaneous, muscle), and MTV was calculated for each category. Univariate Cox modeling was used to associate relative and directional change in metabolic and volumetric PET/CT characteristics with PD and death, after adjusting for bridging therapy. LASSO method was used for multivariable model selection. Pre-LD PET/CT characteristics were also assessed for association with presence and duration of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), grade 3+ immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), tocilizumab (toci) use, and corticosteroid use. Results: From 2018-2020, axi-cel was delivered to 69 patients. Histology included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (57%), transformed follicular lymphoma (23%), or high-grade lymphoma (19%). Pre-leuk and pre-LD PET/CT scans were performed a median of 46 days and 7 days prior to CAR-T infusion, respectively. Forty patients (58%) received bridging therapy between scans, including 9 (13%) receiving radiotherapy. At a median follow-up of 13 months, 39 (57%) had died and 46 (67%) had PD. Sixty patients (87%) developed CRS following CAR-T infusion for a median duration of 5 days. Presence of pre-LD parenchymal disease was associated with longer duration CRS (p=0.032). Thirty-seven patients (54%) developed ICANS for a median duration of 4.5 days, including 12 (32%) with grade 3+ ICANS. Greater pre-LD total MTV was associated with higher risk of grade 3+ ICANS (p=0.042). Greater pre-LD SUVMax was associated with longer duration ICANS (p=0.032). Nineteen (28%) patients required toci. Greater pre-LD total MTV, SUVMax, TLG, and volume of the largest lesion were associated with increased use of toci (p<0.05 for all). Greater pre-LD total MTV and TLG of the largest lesion were associated with increased use of corticosteroid (p<0.05 for each). While no individual pre-leuk or pre-LD PET/CT characteristics were associated with risk of PD or death, increases from pre-leuk to pre-LD in total MTV, total TLG, parenchymal MTV, and nodal MTV were associated with increased risk of PD (Figure 1). Similarly, increases from pre-leuk to pre-LD in parenchymal MTV, nodal MTV, TLG of the largest lesion, and total number of lesions were associated with increased risk of death (p<0.05 for all). LASSO analysis identified increasing extranodal MTV (≥25% increase) and increasing TLG of the largest lesion (≥10% increase) as strong predictors of death (AUC 0.74, Table 1). Kaplan-Meier plots were generated for overall and progression-free survival using these risk factors (Figure 2). Additional patients and follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: Patients with greater pre-LD MTV had higher risk of grade 3+ ICANS and use of toci or corticosteroids. Increasing metabolic disease burden during CAR-T manufacturing is associated with increased risk of PD and death. A two variable risk score using increasing extranodal disease and increasing TLG of the largest lesion may stratify prognosis prior to CAR-T and inform treatment paradigms. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bennani: Verastem: Other: Advisory Board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory Board; Daichii Sankyo Inc: Other: Advisory Board; Kyowa Kirin: Other: Advisory Board; Vividion: Other: Advisory Board; Kymera: Other: Advisory Board. Paludo: Karyopharm: Research Funding. Wang: Genentech: Research Funding; LOXO Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; InnoCare: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ansell: Bristol Myers Squibb, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Regeneron, Affimed, AI Therapeutics, Pfizer, Trillium and Takeda: Research Funding. Lin: Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Legend: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sorrento: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Vineti: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Use of Artificial Intelligence Electrocardiography to Predict Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 50-51
Author(s):  
Georgios Christopoulos ◽  
Zachi I. Attia ◽  
Peter A. Noseworthy ◽  
Timothy G. Call ◽  
Wei Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Very High

Background: Clinical factors including previous history of AF, heart failure, hypertension, valvular heart disease, increased age and male gender increase the risk of AF in CLL patients (Shanafelt, Leukemia and Lymphoma 2017). Treatment with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) such as ibrutinib has also been associated with an increased risk of AF in CLL. We evaluated the role of artificial intelligence electrocardiography (AI-ECG) in predicting ibrutinib-induced AF (and, for reference, AF unrelated to ibrutinib) in patients with CLL. Methods: We identified two cohorts of CLL patients using the Mayo Clinic CLL Database. Cohort 1 included patients evaluated within 12 months of CLL diagnosis who did not ever receive ibrutinib. Cohort 2 included patients who were treated with ibrutinib. The electrocardiographic signature of AF in sinus rhythm was detected by an AI-ECG algorithm previously developed using a convolutional neural network (Attia, Lancet 2019). The baseline AI-ECG AF score (positive defined as >0.10 on a scale of 0-1 which offers best balance between sensitivity and specificity per Attia et al.) was computed based on ECGs obtained within 10 years prior to CLL diagnosis (Cohort 1) or 10 years prior to initiation of ibrutinib therapy (Cohort 2). Patients with AF at baseline, missing data, or with ECGs previously used to train the AI algorithm were excluded. Reverse Kaplan Meier diagrams were plotted for both cohorts grouped by AI-ECG positivity. Cox proportional hazards were fitted to assess the predictive ability of AI-ECG in both cohorts. Results: After screening 2,739 patients and applying exclusion criteria (126 patients had baseline AF) a total of 1,149 patients with median 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-9) baseline ECGs were included in the analysis (Figure 1A). Cohort 1 included 951 patients with a median follow up of 3.0 (IQR 0.6-7.0) years and positive baseline AI-ECG in 546 (57%) patients. Cohort 2 included 198 patients with a median follow up of 1.6 (IQR 0.7-3.2) years and positive baseline AI-ECG in 91 (46%) patients. In Cohort 1, the median age was 67 years (IQR 58-72), 681 (72%) of patients were men, 68% had low/intermediate risk CLL-International Prognostic Index (IPI), and 32% had high/very high-risk CLL-IPI. In Cohort 2, the median age was 69 years (IQR 62-75), 139 (70%) of patients were men, 13% had low/intermediate risk CLL-IPI, and 87% had high/very high-risk CLL-IPI. AF occurred during follow up in 164 patients (17%) in Cohort 1 and 46 patients (23%) in Cohort 2. In both Cohorts 1 and 2, a positive baseline AI-ECG significantly increased the incidence of AF during follow up (log rank <0.001) (Figure 1B and C). Hazard ratios (for positive vs. negative AI-ECG) were 33.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.0-76.6) for Cohort 1 and 14.8 (95% CI 5.3-41.3) for Cohort 2. Conclusion: The addition of AI to a standard 12-lead ECG obtained during normal sinus rhythm - an inexpensive and ubiquitous test - predicts the occurrence of future AF in patients with CLL. This holds true irrespective of BTKi -based therapy and has important implications for the management of CLL patients. Disclosures Ding: Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MEI Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kenderian:BMS: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Mettaforge: Patents & Royalties; Juno: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Lentigen: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Humanigen: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Torque: Consultancy. Wang:Novartis: Research Funding; Innocare: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Kay:Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kapoor:Cellectar: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Parikh:MorphoSys: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Four-Year Survival and Durability Results of Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with CHP in the Frontline Treatment of Patients with CD30-Expressing Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2993-2993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle A Fanale ◽  
Steven M Horwitz ◽  
Andres Forero-Torres ◽  
Nancy L Bartlett ◽  
Ranjana H Advani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Alk Positive

Abstract Background Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) encompass ~10-15% of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), or variations thereof, are the most commonly used treatment regimens with complete remission (CR) rates ranging from 39-55% (Reimer 2009, d'Amore 2012). With the exception of low international prognostic index (IPI)-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive ALCL, with 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) ranging from 25-35% and 30-40%, respectively (Ellin 2014). We previously reported the results of this phase 1 trial that evaluated brentuximab vedotin (BV) administered in sequence with CHOP, or in combination with CHP (CHOP without vincristine) in treatment-naive patients (pts) with CD30-expressing PTCL (NCT01309789). The combination therapy (BV+CHP) showed safety and activity at standard doses, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 100% and complete response (CR) rate of 88% (Fanale 2014). The most common adverse events (AEs) experienced by pts were nausea and peripheral sensory neuropathy (69% each). Four-year durability data and updated results on peripheral neuropathy (PN) resolution from the BV+CHP combination treatment arm are presented herein. Methods Adults with CD30-expressing PTCL, including systemic ALCL (anaplastic large cell lymphoma, ALK-negative, or ALK-positive with IPI score ≥2) were eligible for this study. CD30 expression for non-ALCL pts was defined as ≥1% CD30 expression in malignant cells. Pts on the combination treatment arm received 1.8 mg/kg BV and standard-dose CHP q3wk for up to 6 cycles. Pts who achieved at least a partial response (PR) following treatment could receive continued BV 1.8 mg/kg q3wk as single-agent for up to 10 additional cycles. Antitumor response was assessed by the investigator according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results Twenty-six previously untreated pts received BV+CHP. Disease diagnoses included systemic ALCL (n=19; including ALK-negative, n=16 and ALK-positive, n=3), PTCL-NOS (n=2), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n=2), adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL, n=2), and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL, n=1). Twenty-one of the 26 pts who achieved remission with combination treatment continued on to receive single-agent BV. Overall, the 26 pts received a median of 13 cycles (range, 3 to 16) of BV. After a median observation period of 52 months (range 4.6 to 58.3) from first dose, 18 pts remain on study. The estimated 4-year PFS and OS rates are 52% (95% CI: 31, 69) and 80% (95% CI: 59, 91), respectively. The median PFS has not been reached (95% CI: 12.3, -). To date, 15 of 19 ALCL (3/3 ALK-positive, 12/16 ALK-negative), and 6 of 7 non-ALCL pts were alive at last follow-up. Five pts (19%) received subsequent treatment with single-agent BV in long-term follow-up and 3 pts received stem cell transplants (1 autologous, 2 allogeneic) for relapsed disease. There were no pts who underwent a consolidative stem cell transplant. Of the 26 pts treated with combination therapy, 19 (73%) experienced PN. Of these pts, 95% (18 of 19) experienced complete resolution (8 pts), or some resolution or improvement (defined as a decrease by at least 1 grade from worst grade, 10 pts). Of the pts who experienced improvement, 1 pt each improved from Grade 3 to a lowest Grade 2 and from Grade 3 to a lowest Grade 1, and 5 pts improved from Grade 2 to a lowest Grade 1. The median time to resolution of PN symptoms was 5.7 months. Eleven pts had ongoing neuropathy at last follow-up, of which, 9 pts had Grade 1 severity and 2 pts had Grade 2. Conclusions These 4-year durability results demonstrate that among pts with PTCL, initial therapy with BV in combination with CHP can induce long-term remissions with a tolerable safety profile. A phase 3 randomized trial comparing BV+CHP with CHOP for the frontline treatment of CD30-expressing PTCL is ongoing (NCT01777152). Progression-free Survival Figure Figure. Disclosures Horwitz: Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Huya: Consultancy; FortySeven: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding. Forero-Torres:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Bartlett:Gilead: Consultancy. Pro:Takeda: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Celegene: Honoraria. Chen:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Davies:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel to scientific conferences, Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bayer: Research Funding; Karyopharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Illidge:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Uttarwar:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huebner:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ren:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Perioperative Heparin Bridging in Patients Receiving Oral Anticoagulation: Meta-Analysis of Bleeding and Thromboembolic Rates

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 545-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jovana Yudin ◽  
Deborah Siegal ◽  
Wendy Lim ◽  
Scott Kaatz ◽  
James Douketis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Methodologic Quality ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Abstract 545 Background: Periprocedural bridging using unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients receiving chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) is often utilized with the view to reduce the risk of thromboembolic (TE) events. Optimal perioperative anticoagulant methods have not been established. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published English-language studies from 2001 to 2010 examining bleeding and TE events in patients receiving bridging therapy during temporary OAC interruption for elective procedures. Results: A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Collaboration databases yielded 32 studies on 6760 bridged patients. Studies were reviewed by 2 independent data collectors (k=0.869). Study quality was generally poor with risk of bias. Thirty-one studies were observational with 1 randomized controlled trial. Low TE risk and/or non-OAC patient groups were used for comparison in 12 observational studies. Major (22/32, 68.8%) and non-major (27/32, 84.4%) procedures were represented. TE events occurred in 67 of 6760 bridged (0.87%; 95% CI 0.40%–1.35%) and 29 of 4897 non-bridged (0.77%; 95% CI 0.24%–1.30%) patients. Using a random effects model, there was no difference in the risk of TE events in bridged versus non-bridged patients (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.53–1.95). Bridged patients had a significantly increased risk of overall bleeding (OR 5.47, 95% CI 3.89–7.70) and major bleeding (OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.13–10.4) compared to non-bridged patients. There was no difference in TE events (OR 2.44, 95% CI 0.34–17.4) or overall bleeding (OR 2.40 95% CI 0.72–8.05) in patients receiving full versus intermediate/low dose LMWH. Summary: Patients receiving heparin bridging during OAC interruption appear to be at increased risk of bleeding and similar risk of TE events compared to non-bridged patients. Studies of high methodologic quality are needed to develop an optimal anticoagulation strategy and inform clinical decision-making. Disclosures: Lim: Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria. Kaatz:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; National Institute of Health: Research Funding; Canadian Institute of Health Research: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Ortho-McNeil: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Speakers Bureau; AC Forum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; National Certification Board of Anticoagulation Providers: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; National Blood Clot Alliance: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals A Phase I/II Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) Plus Rituximab (R) As Frontline Therapy for Patients with Immunosuppression-Associated CD30+ and/or EBV+ Lymphomas

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 351-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Pearse ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
Leo I. Gordon ◽  
Reem Karmali ◽  
Jane N. Winter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Lymphoid Malignancies ◽  
Frontline Therapy

Background: Immunocompromised patients (pts) face an approximate 6-fold increase in lifetime risk of lymphoid malignancies compared with immunocompetent counterparts. Additionally, up to 80% of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) cases are driven by EBV-associated mechanisms of tumorigenesis. Approximately 70% will express CD30 and over 80% will express CD20. Recent studies of chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) have reported median overall survival (OS) of 2-4 years and treatment-related mortality (TRM) rates of 13-50%. Moreover, solid organ transplant (SOT) pts are at significant risk of graft rejection when CIT is employed, possibly due to "off target" depletion of regulatory T-cell populations. R monotherapy induction, followed by response-stratified use of CIT, has been evaluated (Trappe, et al, JCO, 2016). However, ~75% of pts had an inadequate response to R alone and required subsequent CIT; 2-yr OS for the population as a whole was ~70%. BV is an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate that received accelerated FDA approval for previously untreated CD30+ T-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma. We hypothesized that a combination of BV and R would yield improved breadth and depth of response compared with R monotherapy induction, would spare pts subsequent exposure to CIT, and result in favorable OS. Methods: We report here results of a phase I/II multicenter study investigating the efficacy and safety of BV+R as frontline therapy in pts diagnosed with immunosuppression-associated CD30+ and/or EBV+ lymphoid malignancies. Induction consisted of R 375 mg/m2 given days 1, 8, 15, 22 and BV 1.2 mg/kg given days 1, 8, 15, of a 28-day cycle, followed by restaging. Those with progression were removed from study. Pts with stable disease were offered study discontinuation or completion of one consolidation cycle followed by repeat disease assessment. Pts with partial response or complete response (CR) could receive either consolidation followed by maintenance therapy (MT) or move directly to MT without consolidation. Consolidation was identical to induction dosing; MT consisted of BV 1.8 mg/kg every 3 weeks and R 375 mg/m2 every 6 weeks for up to 1 year of therapy. Toxicity was defined using CTCAE 4.0 and response (Cheson, 2007) was assessed at the end of induction, consolidation (if given), and after cycles 4 and 7 of BV. Results: A total of 22 pts were entered in the trial. Toxicity and response data are available for 20 pts. Median age was 67 years (range, 30-79) and 14 pts (64%) were male (range, 30-79 years). Fourteen pts (64%) had received either a SOT or hematopoietic allograft requiring immunosuppression, 3 pts required immunosuppression for underlying rheumatologic conditions, and 3 pts were found to have EBV-associated lymphoid malignancies in the absence of iatrogenic immunosuppression (Table 1). Overall response rate was 70%, including a CR rate of 60%. With median follow-up of 26.1 month, the probability of progression-free survival at 1 year was 75.2% and 67.6% at 3 years (Fig 1). Probability of OS was 89.2% at both 1-year and 3-year follow-up (Fig 1). Median time to best response was 28 days. Three pts withdrew consent after induction, 2 pts died (1 death related to treatment), and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Seven pts (31%) required dose adjustments or delay of medication administration during induction therapy and 45% required discontinuation of therapy due to toxicity within 1 year. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia, lymphopenia, and pancreatitis. The most frequent adverse events of any grade were fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, pancytopenia, and peripheral neuropathy (Table 2). Conclusions: The combination of BV + R had an acceptable safety profile and appeared effective in achieving early remissions when used as frontline therapy for PTLD and other immunosuppression-related lymphomas. Specifically, over half of pts achieved CR, and 75% have been spared exposure to multi-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy. Furthermore, survival and PFS data were encouraging compared with historical controls. However, nearly half of pts discontinued therapy within 1 year due to toxicity suggesting poor long-term tolerance of the regimen and that earlier cessation of therapy may be warranted. Further studies are needed to confirm these efficacy results and to determine optimal BV+R dosing regimens and durations. Disclosures Pro: Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria. Gordon:Gilead: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Juno/Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Zylem LLC: Other: co-founder; research in nanoparticles in cancer. Karmali:Gilead/Kite; Juno/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astrazeneca: Speakers Bureau; Takeda, BMS: Other: Research Funding to Institution. Winter:Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ma:Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Xeme: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Beigene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Behdad:Pfizer: Other: Speaker; Thermo Fisher: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Loxo-Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Petrich:AbbVie: Employment, Equity Ownership. Smith:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document