Perioperative Heparin Bridging in Patients Receiving Oral Anticoagulation: Meta-Analysis of Bleeding and Thromboembolic Rates
Abstract Abstract 545 Background: Periprocedural bridging using unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients receiving chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) is often utilized with the view to reduce the risk of thromboembolic (TE) events. Optimal perioperative anticoagulant methods have not been established. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published English-language studies from 2001 to 2010 examining bleeding and TE events in patients receiving bridging therapy during temporary OAC interruption for elective procedures. Results: A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Collaboration databases yielded 32 studies on 6760 bridged patients. Studies were reviewed by 2 independent data collectors (k=0.869). Study quality was generally poor with risk of bias. Thirty-one studies were observational with 1 randomized controlled trial. Low TE risk and/or non-OAC patient groups were used for comparison in 12 observational studies. Major (22/32, 68.8%) and non-major (27/32, 84.4%) procedures were represented. TE events occurred in 67 of 6760 bridged (0.87%; 95% CI 0.40%–1.35%) and 29 of 4897 non-bridged (0.77%; 95% CI 0.24%–1.30%) patients. Using a random effects model, there was no difference in the risk of TE events in bridged versus non-bridged patients (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.53–1.95). Bridged patients had a significantly increased risk of overall bleeding (OR 5.47, 95% CI 3.89–7.70) and major bleeding (OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.13–10.4) compared to non-bridged patients. There was no difference in TE events (OR 2.44, 95% CI 0.34–17.4) or overall bleeding (OR 2.40 95% CI 0.72–8.05) in patients receiving full versus intermediate/low dose LMWH. Summary: Patients receiving heparin bridging during OAC interruption appear to be at increased risk of bleeding and similar risk of TE events compared to non-bridged patients. Studies of high methodologic quality are needed to develop an optimal anticoagulation strategy and inform clinical decision-making. Disclosures: Lim: Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria. Kaatz:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; National Institute of Health: Research Funding; Canadian Institute of Health Research: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Ortho-McNeil: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Speakers Bureau; AC Forum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; National Certification Board of Anticoagulation Providers: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; National Blood Clot Alliance: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Leukemias: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients (pts). The risk of VTE, however, differs according to cancer type. Pts with hematologic malignancies are at an increased risk of VTE events, either due to the underlying disease biology or related to treatment. This risk exists even in acute leukemia (AL), which is characterized by profound thrombocytopenia and coagulopathies that present treatment challenges. Advances in anti-leukemic therapies and improved supportive care over the last several decades may have impacted the extent to which an average patient is at risk for VTE We performed a meta-analysis of published literature on VTE rates in AL pts and evaluated trends in VTE incidence in relation to the reported study time period. Methods: This meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Scopus and Cochran databases to identify relevant studies published between January 1980 and June 2018. All studies including randomized controlled, retrospective or observational studies in AL pts which investigated VTE as an endpoint were included. Abstracts, posters, review articles, and case reports were excluded. Articles were excluded if they did not provide disease-level data. The search terms included "venous thromboembolism", "deep venous thrombosis", "pulmonary embolism", and "leukemia". Furthermore, citations were supplemented by cross checking the reference lists of eligible studies and relevant reviews to identify additional published data. We collected study period, study design, study publication date, AL subtype, total patients, and rates of VTE. When reported, we collected information on VTE prophylaxis and presence of central lines. Meta-analysis of VTE rates was performed using an established Bayesian logistic random effects model. The model assumes that the log odds of VTE is exchangeable across studies with Gaussian distribution and random hierarchical mean and standard deviation. For both analyses, the hierarchical mean assumed a Gaussian prior with mean 0 and variance = 200. The inter-study standard deviation was assumed uniform (0,10). Given treatment and patient heterogeneity among distinct subtypes of AL, analyses were undertaken separately for each AL subtype. Results for individual studies and the combined inter-study mean VTE rate are described by the resultant posterior medians and 95% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals. Results: From the initial search, 2527 articles were identified. Among these, 938 were duplicate publications, 1408 did not meet content inclusion criteria, 150 were review articles or case reports, 2 studies lacked disease level data, thus, leaving 31 studies for analysis. A total of 29 studies focused on ALL, 11 on AML, 11 on APL, and some studies included multiple disease populations. The inter-study mean incidence of VTE for ALL was 8.67% (95% HPD 6.01%-11.58%), fig 1a, for AML was 7.25% (95% HPD 4.12%-11.09%), fig 1b, and for APL was 12.94% (95% HPD 7.04%-20.67%), fig 1c. .. Our graphical analysis indicates an increase in risk of VTE with time for ALL (fig 2a), AML (fig 2b), and APL (fig 2c). Conclusion: In the present meta-analysis, we determined that the overall incidence of VTE in AL pts ranged from 7-13%. Among AL subtypes, APL pts had the highest rate of VTE. We observed an increased risk of VTE over time. We postulate this is multifactorial and may be related to an increase in case findings from increased screening, aging sedentary population, and increased use of prothombotic agents. Notable strengths of this study include the largest review of association of VTE with AL and evolving risk of VTE with time. These findings need to be considered in light of several limitations - lack of comparator group limiting ability to generate pooled relative risks for VTE, heterogeneity in study populations and reporting and scare data on VTE prophylaxis. Further data are required to determine the mechanism for the increase in risk. Given the VTE risk and its known impact on morbidity, mortality and associated health care costs, prospective studies are warranted in AL pts to facilitate establishment of guidelines for prophylaxis and management of thrombotic complications. Disclosures Carraway: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; FibroGen: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Balaxa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau. Advani:Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nazha:MEI: Consultancy. Gerds:Apexx Oncology: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy. Sekeres:Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Opsona: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Abstract Background. Rituximab improved outcomes of all CD20+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes. Rituximab induces a transient B-cell depletion and a dose-dependent T-cell inactivation (Stroopinsky et al., Cancer Immunol Immunother 2012) predisposing to T-cell dependent infections and to a potential impaired T-cell immunosurveillance. Secondary neoplasms (SN) is infrequent in trials including rituximab and the SN risk associated to rituximab across multiple trials has not been reported. We performed a systematic review of published trials comparing chemotherapy with or without rituximab to evaluate SN occurrence. Methods. Our primary endpoint was SN risk in patients with NHL treated with rituximab. We searched PubMed and Embase databases for randomised controlled trials on rituximab and lymphoma where rituximab constituted the only difference between treatment arms and where SN incidence or SN related death were reported. Authors were contacted for SN related rituximab exposure if not detailed. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and HIV-related lymphomas were excluded due to increased risk of SN. Updated follow-up of eligible trials presented at annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society of Hematology were retrieved. Data were extracted independently by two authors. A random effects DerSimonian-Laird meta-analysis was performed to estimate the summary effect of rituximab on the hazard of SN. Statistical heterogeneity was tested using Woolf test. Results. We identified nine trials cumulating 4621 patients with 2312 exposed to rituximab and 2309 not exposed. These nine trials are known with the following names: PRIMA (1), GELA LNH98.5 (2), MINT (3), CORAL (4), IELSG-19 (5), EORTC20981 (6), OSHO#39 (7), SAKK 35/98 (8), RICOVER60 (9). Histology were diffuse large B cell (n=4), follicular (n=4) and marginal zone (n=1) lymphomas. Median age was 58.1 years. Sex distribution was available for seven trials with 1650 (47.6%) women and 1814 (52.4%) men. In all these trials but one (SAKK 35/98), rituximab was used associated with chemotherapy: CHOP, CHOEP, FCM, MCP, DHAP, ICE, or chlorambucil. At a median follow-up of 73 months [interquartile range: 72-84], a total of 334 SN was observed, including 169 SN in patients randomised to rituximab as compared to 165 SN in patients not randomised to rituximab (OR= 0.88; 95%CI: 0.66-1.19) (Figure 1). No evidence of significant heterogeneity was noticed across trials (p = 0.93). Notably, the proportion of females, histology subtypes, use of rituximab in first line, and use of rituximab over prolonged periods in maintenance did not influence SN risk (p = 0.94, p = 0.80, p = 0.87, p = 0.87 respectively). The SN risk was not increased in protocols administrating rituximab over periods of 8 months to 12 months (CORAL , OSHO#39) as opposed to periods of 24 months (PRIMA, EORTC20981) (p=0.86). Conclusions. This meta-analysis of nine trials randomising rituximab in NHL patients suggests no SN predisposition at a median follow-up of 6 years. SN risk associated with the combination of rituximab and new targeted therapies warrants prospective monitoring. Figure 1. Standard meta-analysis plot of the odds ratio of SN prevalence in the rituximab arm compared to the control arm Figure 1. Standard meta-analysis plot of the odds ratio of SN prevalence in the rituximab arm compared to the control arm Disclosures Fleury: Lundbeck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Preceptorship Other. Pfreundschuh:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding. Salles:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. van Oers:Roche: Consultancy. Gisselbrecht:Roche: Research Funding. Zucca:Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Herold:Roche Pharma AG/Germany: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ghielmini:Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.
Introduction Immunomodulatory agents (IMiD's) are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), particularly when combined with high dose steroids. Studies evaluating the use of lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD) and carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRD) in the frontline setting for multiple myeloma (MM) have reported a 6% and 24% incidence of thrombosis, respectively, despite primary thrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin (ASA) (Richardson, et al. Blood. 2010; Korde, et al. JAMA Oncol 2015). Recent data, including the Hokusai VTE Cancer Trial, have suggested that safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preserved in the setting of treatment of solid malignancy-associated thrombosis (Raskob, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018; Mantha, et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017). Despite this data, there is limited experience and use of DOACs in prevention of thromboses in the setting of hematologic malignancies, specifically MM. After careful review of literature, since early 2018, we changed our clinical practice and routinely placed newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving KRD at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) on concomitant rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily, regardless of VTE risk stratification. In the following abstract, we present VTE rates and safety data for newly diagnosed MM patients receiving RVD with ASA vs. KRD with ASA vs. KRD with rivaroxaban prophylaxis. Methods This was an IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective chart review study. All untreated patients with newly diagnosed MM, receiving at least one cycle of RVD or KRD between January 2015 and October 2018 were included. The period of observation included the time between the first day of therapy until 90 days after completion of induction therapy. Patients were identified by querying the pharmacy database for carfilzomib or bortezomib administration and outpatient medication review of thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban or ASA. VTE diagnoses were confirmed by ICD-10 codes and appropriate imaging studies (computed tomography and ultrasound). Descriptive statistics were performed. Results During the observation period, 241 patients were identified to have received RVD or KRD in the frontline (99 RVD with ASA; 97 KRD with ASA; 45 KRD with rivaroxaban). Baseline characteristics were well distributed among the three arms, with a median age of 60 (30-94) in the RVD ASA arm, 62 (33-77) in the KRD ASA arm, and 60 (24-79) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease in 13% (N=13), 9.3% (N=9), and 11% (N=5) of the RVD ASA, KRD ASA, and KRD rivaroxaban arms, respectively. Median weekly doses of dexamethasone were higher in both KRD arms, 40 mg (20-40) vs. 20 mg (10-40) in the RVD ASA arm. The average initial doses of lenalidomide were 22 mg in the RVD ASA arm compared to 25 mg in both the KRD ASA and KRD rivaroxaban arms. After querying the pharmacy database, no patients were identified to have a history or concomitant use of erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) use. Treatment-related VTE's occurred in 4 patients (4.0%) in the RVD ASA arm, 16 patients (16.5%) in the KRD ASA arm, and in 1 patient (2.2%) in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Average time to VTE was 6.15 months (Range 5.42, 9.73) after treatment initiation in the RVD ASA group, while it was 2.61 months (Range 0.43, 5.06) in the KRD ASA group and 1.35 months in the KRD rivaroxaban group. Minor, grade 1 bleeding events per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were identified in 1 (1.1%) patient in the RVD ASA arm, 5 (5.2%) patients in the KRD ASA arm, and 1 (2.2%) patient in the KRD rivaroxaban arm. Conclusion More efficacious MM combination therapies have been found to increase the risk of VTE when using ASA prophylaxis, indicating better thromboprophylaxis is needed. We found patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with KRD were more likely to experience a VTE and these events occurred earlier compared to patients receiving ASA prophylaxis with RVD. Importantly, the rate of VTE was reduced to the same level as ASA prophylaxis with RVD when low-dose rivaroxaban 10 mg daily was used with KRD, and without necessarily increasing bleeding risk. Our retrospective data support the development of prospective clinical trials further investigating DOAC use in thromboprophylaxis for NDMM patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatments. Figure Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lesokhin:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties; Genentech: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mailankody:Juno: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; CME activity by Physician Education Resource: Honoraria. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics and Precision Biosciences: Consultancy. Landgren:Theradex: Other: IDMC; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Other: IDMC; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Off-label use of rivaroxaban for outpatient prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) will be explicitly disclosed to the audience.
Introduction Pregnancy in sickle cell disease (SCD) is associated with an exacerbation of SCD-related complications and an increased risk of maternal complications. The increased risk is partly due to physiologic adaptations in pregnancy, which include increased metabolic demands and a hypercoagulable state. The maternal death rate for SCD is 629 per 100,000 deliveries, compared to 12 per 100,000 deliveries in black women and 6 per 100,000 deliveries in the general population (Raider et al., 2016). Studies on maternal and perinatal outcomes of patients with SCD present inconsistent and conflicting results. Some studies have reported an increase in maternal complications such as pre-eclampsia, acute chest syndrome and thromboembolic events, while other studies have reported no significant risk in adverse maternal outcomes. The inconsistent findings reported in prior studies may be attributed to small sample sizes and single-centered sites. Our study aims to determine the prevalence and predictors of maternal morbidity among participants enrolled in the SCD Implementation Consortium (SCDIC) registry, which is the largest, most geographically diverse SCD participant sample in the United States. Methods This cross-sectional study included women enrolled in the SCDIC registry who had at least one pregnancy event. The SCDIC is composed of eight academic SCD centers across the United States and one data-coordinating center. Participants were enrolled in the SCDIC registry if they were 18 to 45 years of age and had a confirmed diagnosis of SCD. Enrolled participants completed a series of surveys that collected sociodemographic information, SCD and pregnancy history and data abstractions of participants' medical records was completed. Medical complications queried during pregnancy included: vaso-occlusive episodes, acute chest syndrome, blood transfusion requirement, preeclampsia, maternal diabetes and deep venous thrombosis. Descriptive analysis of sociodemographic, clinical and maternal characteristics was conducted. Bivariate analysis was performed using Chi-Square test, Mann-Whitney U test, t-test, and logistic regressions, as appropriate. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analysis. Results The study sample included 743 women who had at least one pregnancy event, and a total of 1066 live births. Almost all women (96.3%) were African American, with a median age of 21 years (inter-quartile range of 19 to 23 years) at first birth. The majority had Hb SS SCD genotype (69.5%; 513 of the 738 with SCD genotype data). Of all reported pregnancies, participants did not use hydroxyurea during conception (78%), and pregnancy (84.5%). Only 2.7 % of the women reported using fertility drugs or assisted reproductive procedures. Seventy five percent of the pregnancies that ended in live births had maternal complications. The leading complications were vaso-occlusive episodes (61.2%), pregnancy requiring blood transfusion(s) (33.2%), preeclampsia (15.4%), deep venous thrombosis (5.6%) and acute chest syndrome (7.7%). When the pregnancies were stratified by SCD genotype, women with Hb SS had a higher occurrence of acute chest syndrome (63.4% vs. 26.7%), transfusion requirement (70.8% vs. 21%) and preeclampsia (66.7% vs 22.4%). In the univariate logistic regressions, multiparous women, with a history of adverse maternal outcomes in a previous pregnancy, had higher odds of vaso-occlusive episodes (OR: 3.42; 95% CI: 2.42-4.94) acute chest syndrome (OR:4.99; 95% CI:2.56- 9.48), transfusion requirement (OR:3.86; 95% CI:2.64- 5.69), and pre-eclampsia (OR:3.36; 95% CI:2.05-5.45). Conclusion In this large multicenter registry, we found pregnant women with SCD have significant maternal complications. Early antenatal care by healthcare providers knowledgeable about risk factors for adverse maternal outcomes in SCD is essential improve maternal and fetal outcomes and reduce the maternal death rate for SCD. Disclosures Hankins: Novartis: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; MJH Life Sciences: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; UptoDate: Consultancy; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute: Honoraria, Research Funding; LINKS Incorporate Foundation: Research Funding; American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology: Honoraria. Treadwell:Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy; UpToDate: Honoraria. King:Amphivena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Bioline: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Cell Works: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novimmune: Research Funding; RiverVest: Consultancy; Tioma Therapuetics: Consultancy; WUGEN: Current equity holder in private company. Gordeuk:CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Imara: Research Funding; Ironwood: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Kanter:SCDAA Medical and Research Advisory Board: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AGIOS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BEAM: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy; GLG: Honoraria; Jeffries: Honoraria; Cowen: Honoraria; Wells Fargo: Honoraria; NHLBI Sickle Cell Advisory Board: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medscape: Honoraria; Guidepoint Global: Honoraria; bluebird bio, inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy. Glassberg:Pfizer: Research Funding; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding. Shah:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.
Introduction: With the Federal Drug and Administration approval of the use of emicizumab from birth to adulthood, clinicians will now grapple with when to choose and offer emicizumab for routine prophylaxis, especially in previously untreated patients (PUPs). Given the overall limited real-world reported data and experience using emicizumab in PUPs, we created and administered a survey to medical providers in the United States who care for paediatric patients with haemophilia to investigate real-world practice strategies and treatment selection for PUPs. Methods: After review and endorsement by the Haemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society (HTRS), the survey was electronically distributed by e-mail to all providers included in the HTRS core member list. The survey was also sent to those providers included in a list of Haemophilia Treatment Centre (HTC) physicians (with duplicate emails reconciled). Providers needed to self-identify as ones that treat pediatric patients to be included. The survey was developed as a tiered survey with questions presented to each recipient based on their prior responses. Results: Seventy-seven completed surveys were included and analysed. All participants were active providers at a comprehensive HTC and the majority (93.4%) were practicing at an academically affiliated site. In terms of characteristics of those that answered the survey, forty-eight percent of responders reported that 1-20% of their patients had expressed interest in emicizumab. 46% of participants (34/74) reported that they would personally consider emicizumab as their prophylaxis recommendation for the majority (>50%) of their hemophilia A patients without inhibitors. 57% (44/76) reported that 1-10% of their non-inhibitor hemophilia A patients were already prescribed emicizumab prophylaxis. Each participant was then asked about his or her consideration of emicizumab as prophylaxis therapy for a 2 month old PUP. Just over the majority were unsure or said no to this consideration (51.3%) and their concerns were lack of information on safety and efficacy in this young age group and increased risk for inhibitor development. If the 2 month old PUP had a high risk of inhibitor, the majority of providers who initially were hesitant to start emicizumab prophylaxis would remain so. Of note, those providers went on to be asked if the patient had gone on to complete 50 exposure days without inhibitor development, they would then become more likely to initiate emicizumab prophylaxis therapy. Use of concurrent factor replacement was posed to all participants and there were varied responses. Discussion: Overall, our results reflect a widespread practice variation and a not yet well-standardized or defined approach for the use of emicizumab in PUPs with haemophilia A. In this survey, patient preference and individual bleeding risk were the top reasons for which a provider would consider using switching to emicizumab prophylaxis in both severe and mild/moderate haemophilia A patients. This pattern of practice reflects the current era of individualized medicine. Overall, our findings reinforce the need for more studies to investigate the outcomes of a combined treatment approach with FVIII concentrates and emicizumab focusing in the potential benefit of this approach in decreasing the risk for inhibitor development PUPs. Clinicians also feel the need for further data to help clarifying the safety of emicizumab in this population. Figure Disclosures Gupta: Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda-Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Davis:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda Shire: Consultancy; Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy. Corrales-Medina:Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda-Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Introduction Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common disorder that can be caused by amyloid light-chain amyloidosis (AL). AL is a rare disorder caused by the deposition of amyloid fibers, originating from malignant plasma cells. Amyloid deposition in peripheral nerves causes PN and is present in 35% of patients with newly diagnosed AL. Diagnosis of AL can be difficult, leading to under-recognition, diagnostic delay, and delayed treatment. Virtually all instances of AL are preceded by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). MGUS is relatively common with a reported prevalence of 4.2% in the general Caucasian population over the age of 50 years. Although MGUS is usually considered asymptomatic, a significant proportion of affected individuals develop PN. However, we are not aware of any studies assessing how PN affects risk of MGUS progression to AL. We were therefore motivated to conduct a large population-based study including 15,351 Swedish individuals with MGUS diagnosed 1986-2013. Methods Participants diagnosed with MGUS between 1986-2013 were recruited from a registry of a nationwide network of hematology- and oncology centers and the Swedish Patient Registry. We then cross-linked data on recorded diagnoses of AL and PN from the Swedish Patient Registry, diagnoses of lymphoproliferative disorders form the Swedish Cancer Registry, and dates of death from the Cause of Death Registry to our study cohort. Individuals with a previous history of other lymphoproliferative disorders were excluded from the study. A multi-state survival model was created. At inclusion, participants started providing person time into the PN or the non-PN states depending on whether they had a previous diagnosis of PN. Those with MGUS who developed PN after inclusion were included into the PN state at the time of PN diagnosis and provided person time in the PN state after that. We then created a Cox proportional hazard regression model with AL as the endpoint. Participants were censored at diagnosis of other lymphoproliferative disorders. We adjusted for sex, age, and year of MGUS diagnosis. Results We included 15,351 participants with MGUS. Of those, 996 participants provided person-time with PN (6.5%). About half of those had PN at MGUS diagnosis (55%). A total of 174 cases of AL were recorded, with AL being more common among those who had PN (2.1% vs 1.0% p=0.002). Those who had PN had a 2.3-fold increased risk of AL as compared to those who did not have PN (hazard ratio (HR): 2.3; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.5-3.7; p<0.001). The results were similar for those who had PN at MGUS diagnosis and those who did not. More than half of AL cases (53%) were diagnosed within one year after MGUS diagnosis. The rate was even higher among those with PN, with 82% of AL cases among those who presented with PN being diagnosed within one year after MGUS diagnosis. In the first year after inclusion, the incidence of AL was 15.2 and 6.1 per 1000 person-years for participants with and without PN respectively (HR: 1.8; 95% CI:1.0-3.4; p=0.04). Participants with PN continued to have an increased risk of progression to AL after the first year with an incidence of AL of 2.6 per 1000 person-years as compared to 1.1 per 1000 person-years among participants who did not have PN (HR:2.4; 95% CI: 1.1-5.0; p=0.02) (Figure). Discussion In this large population-based study, including 15,351 individuals with MGUS, we found that individuals with MGUS who develop PN have an increased risk of progression to AL. In fact, individuals with MGUS who have PN at MGUS diagnosis might already have AL. This risk of AL was highest during the first year after MGUS diagnosis with participants with PN having a higher risk than those who did not have PN. PN continued to be associated with a higher risk of MGUS progression to AL throughout the study period. This is the largest study that we are aware of assessing the association of PN and MGUS progression to AL. Since this is a registry-based study based on recorded diagnoses, some clinical data, including MGUS isotype, is not available. These findings suggest that increased awareness of PN as a feature of MGUS might decrease diagnostic delay and improve outcomes for patients with AL. Figure Disclosures Landgren: Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Theradex: Other: IDMC; Adaptive: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Other: IDMC; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Abstract Introduction Placenta-mediated pregnancy complications (PMPC) include pre-eclampsia, late pregnancy loss, placental abruption, and the small-for-gestational age (SGA) newborn. They are leading causes of maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Affected women are at an elevated risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies. We completed a pooled summary-based (i.e. study level) meta-analysis that strongly suggests that low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) reduces the risk of recurrent PMPCs. However, our study-level meta-analysis was limited by high clinical and statistical heterogeneity likely due to the inclusion of women with heterogeneous prior PMPCs and trial designs (e.g. single vs multi-center trials). To address these limitations, the trialists agreed to conduct an individual patient data meta-analysis to identify sources of heterogeneity including exploring which patients benefit from LMWH and which outcomes are prevented. Methods We conducted a systematic review to identify randomised controlled trials that were eligible to contribute individual patient data to a meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of LMWH for reducing the risk of PMPC in women with prior PMPCs. The primary outcome was a composite of early-onset or severe pre-eclampsia, birth of an SGA newborn < 5th percentile, late pregnancy loss (> 20 weeks), or placental abruption leading to delivery. Individual patient data from eligible women were re-coded in a prescribed format and combined in a common dataset for analysis. All studies were assessed for risk of bias. Results Data from 1049 women in nine trials were analysed; Participants were mostly Caucasian (88%) with a mean age of 31.518 had thrombophilia. 525 women were randomised to LMWH and 524 to no LMWH. In our primary outcome analysis, LMWH did not significantly reduce the risk of recurrent PMPCs (LMWH 60/459 (13.1%) vs. no LMWH 92/449 (20.5%) p=0.1). Significant heterogeneity was noted between single center and multi-center trials. In multi-center trials, LMWH reduced HELLP (p=0.03) but none of the other secondary outcomes, whereas in single center trials LMWH reduced all of the secondary outcomes. In sub-group analysis, in multi-center trials LMWH reduced the primary outcome in women with prior abruption (p<0.01) but none of the other sub-groups, whereas in single center trials LMWH was beneficial in all the sub-groups (prior pre-eclampsia, prior severe pre-eclampsia, prior early onset pre-eclampsia, prior SGA <10th, prior SGA < 5th and prior abruption). Conclusions In this individual patient data meta-analysis, LMWH does not appear to reduce the risk of recurrent PMPC in women with prior PMPC. Promising results suggest that women with prior abruption may benefit from LMWH but this should be replicated in future multi-center trials. PROSPERO registration:CRD42013006249 Table. Primary Analysis All Studies Multi-Center Studies Single Center Studies Composite outcome Risk difference (95% CI) N=908 -0.07 (-0.16, 0.01)p = 0.10 N=524 -0.01 (-0.11, 0.09) p = 0.89 N=384 -0.17 (-0.21, -0.13) p < .0001 Secondary Outcome Analyses Severe or Early Preeclampsia Risk difference (95% CI) N=946 -0.04 (-0.10, 0.02) p = 0.20 N=562 0.01 (-0.06, 0.07) p = 0.81 N=384 -0.11 (-0.16, -0.07) p <.0001 HELLP Risk difference (95% CI) N=813 -0.02 (-0.04, -0.004) p = 0.01 N=429 -0.01 (-0.02, -0.001) p = 0.03 N=384 -0.04 (-0.07, -0.01) p = 0.02 SGA <10 Risk difference (95% CI) N=913 -0.08 (-0.14, -0.02) p = 0.01 N=529 -0.03 (-0.10, 0.03) p = 0.32 N=384 -0.14 (-0.18, -0.10) p <0.0001 Abruption leading to delivery Risk difference (95% CI) N=945 -0.01 (-0.02, 0.003) p = 0.14 N=561 -0.01 (-0.03, 0.01) p = 0.53 N=384 -0.016 (-0.027, -0.005) p = 0.005 Subgroup Analyses Prior preeclampsia Risk difference (95% CI) N=583 -0.12 (-0.19, -0.04) p = 0.002 N=288 -0.06 (-0.19, 0.06) p = 0.34 N=295 -0.17 (-0.24, -0.11) p <.0001 Prior severe or early onset Preeclampsia Risk difference (95% CI) N=487 -0.10 (-0.19, -0.02) p = 0.02 N=236 -0.04 (-0.19, 0.12) p = 0.65 N=251 -0.17 (-0.23, -0.11) p <.0001 Any prior late loss (2 >12 weeks or 1 >16 weeks) Risk difference (95% CI) N=245 0.001 (-0.11, 0.12) p = 0.98 N=0 Prior SGA < 10 Risk difference (95% CI) N=305 -0.12 (-0.25, 0.01) p = 0.08 N=203 -0.03 (-0.17, 0.10) p = 0.64 N=102 -0.29 (-0.38, -0.20) p <.0001 Prior abruption Risk difference (95% CI) N=281 -0.16 (-0.22, -0.11) p <.0001 N=95 -0.13 (-0.22, -0.04) p = 0.01 N=186 -0.18 (-0.22, -0.14) p <.0001 Disclosures Rodger: Biomerieux: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Low Molecular Weight Heparin to prevent pregnancy complications. de Vries:Pfizer: Research Funding. Rey:Leo Pharma: Other: Travel Grant. Gris:Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Stago: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; LFB: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxter: Research Funding; BI: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau. Schleussner:Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Middeldorp:GSK/Aspen: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BI: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Bates:Eli Lilly Canada: Other: I hold the Eli Lilly Canada/May Cohen Chair in Women's Health. Eli Lilly Canada provides unrestricted funding for partial salary support through this Chair. Eli Lilly Canada does not manufacture/distribute drugs relevant to the topic to be discussed..
Abstract Introduction Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative disorder characterized by high burden of symptoms, thrombocytosis, increased risk of thrombosis and bleeding, and risk of progression to Myelofibrosis. Interferon alpha (IFN-α) is a potent immunomodulation agent proposed to be capable of inducing complete hematological remission in patients with myeloproliferative disorders. Many INF- α have been studied for treatment of patients with ET. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of IFN-α therapy in patients with ET. Methods Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, and Clinical trials.gov using MeSH terms and keywords for " Thrombocythemia, Essential " AND " Interferons " in April 2021. We did not place any time constraints. Our search produced a total of 825 records and duplicates were removed. After screening and removing irrelevant and review articles, we included 21 original articles reporting IFN-α as the only treatment for ET in adult patients. The data were collected for baseline characteristics of the participants and efficacy and safety of the intervention. Quality evaluation was done using the NIH quality assessment tool. The inter-study variance was calculated using the Der Simonian-Laird Estimator. Proportions along with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were extracted to compute pooled analysis using the 'meta' package by Schwarzer et al. in the R programming language (version 4.16-2). Results A total of 388 patients from 21 articles were evaluated. The median age of participants was 54 (35-62) years and 31% (n=64/205) were males. The type of IFN used were Interferon-alpha in 4 studies, pegylated (PEG)IFN-α-2a in 2 studies, IFN-α-2b in 6 studies, recombinant IFN-α-2C in 3 studies, recombinant IFN-y in 1 study, PEG-IFN-2b in 1 study, recombinant IFN-2b in 2 studies, and PEG-IFN in 1 study. The pooled overall hematological response (OHR) was 86.4% (95% Cl 0.67-0.98, I 2= 65%, p=0.02, n=73) with complete hematological response (CHR) of 70.6% (95% Cl 0.54-0.84, I 2=34%, p=0.21, n=65) and partial hematological response (PHR) of 13% (95% Cl 0.02-0.27, I 2=42%, p=0.16, n=65). The pooled overall molecular response (OMR) was 84% (95% Cl 0.72-0.93, I 2=13%, p=<0.01, n=81) with complete molecular response (CMR) of 64.2% (95% Cl 0.41-0.84, I 2=68%, p=<0.01, n=81) and partial molecular response (PMR) of 35% (95% Cl 0.16-0.56, I 2=33%, p=0.01, n=43). Side effects reported were nausea, allergic reactions, liver dysfunction, dose dependent mild myalgia, fever, malaise, itching, persistent fever, headache, and flu like symptoms. Conclusion Interferon alpha, in different formulations shows consistent and high activity in patients with essential thrombocythemia. It resulted in clinical responses, as well as molecular responses. Side effect profiles were consistent among different reports and were reasonable tolerated. There is a large body of evidence supporting actively and safety of this approach in a diverse ET patient population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures McGuirk: Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite/ Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expense, Kite a Gilead company, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astelllas Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Allovir: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; EcoR1 Capital: Consultancy; Pluristem Therapeutics: Research Funding. Yacoub: Dynavex: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Cara: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Ardelyx: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ACCELERON PHARMA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI Biopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Hylapharm: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.
Abstract Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy commonly preceded by the asymptomatic stage smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). MM is characterized with significant genomic heterogeneity of chromosomal gains and losses (CNVs), translocations, and point mutations (SNVs); alterations that are also observed in SMM patients. However, current SMM risk models rely solely on clinical markers and do not accurately capture progression risk. While incorporating some genomic biomarkers improves prediction, using all MM genomic features to comprehensively stratify patients may increase risk stratification precision in SMM. Methods: We obtained a total of 214 patient samples at SMM diagnosis. We performed whole-exome sequencing on 166 tumors; of these, RNA sequencing was performed on 100. Targeted capture was done on 48 additional tumors. Upon binarization of DNA features, we performed consensus non-negative matrix factorization to identify distinct molecular clusters. We then trained a random forest classifier on translocations, SNVs, and CNVs. The predicted clinical outcomes for the molecular subtypes were further validated in an independent SMM cohort of 74 patients. Results: We identified six genomic subtypes, four with hyperdiploidy (>48 chromosomes, HMC, HKR, HNT, HNF) and two with IgH translocations (FMD, CND) (Table 1). In multivariate analysis accounting for IMWG (20-2-20) clinical risk stages, high-risk (HMC, FMD, HKR) and intermediate-risk (HNT, HNF) genetic subtypes were independent predictors of progression (Hazards ratio [HR]: 3.8 and 5.5, P = 0.016 and 0.001, respectively). The low-risk, CND subtype harboring translocation (11;14) was enriched for the previously defined CD-2 MM signature defined by the B cell markers CD20 and CD79A (FDR = 0.003 ), showed upregulation of CCND1, E2F1, and E2F7 (FDR = 0.01, 0.0004, 0.08), and was enriched for G2M checkpoint, heme metabolism, and monocyte cell signature (FDR = 0.003, 0.003, 0.003, respectively). The FMD subtype with IgH translocations (4;14) and (14;16) was enriched for P53, mTORC1, unfolded protein signaling pathways and plasmacytoid dendritic cell signatures (FDR = 0.01, 0.005, 0.008, respectively). The HKR tumors were enriched for inflammatory cytokine signaling, MYC target genes, T regulatory cell signature, and the MM proliferative (PR) signatures (FDR = 0.02, 0.03, 0.007, 0.02, respectively). The APOBEC mutational signature was enriched in HMC and FMD tumors (P = 0.005), while there was no statistical difference across subtypes in the AID signature. The median follow-up for the primary cohort is 7.1 years. Median TTP for patients in HMC, FMD, and HKR was 3.8, 2.6, and 2.2 years, respectively; TTP for HNT and HNF was 4.3 and 5.2, respectively, while it was 11 years in CND patients (P = 0.007). Moreover, by analyzing the changes in MM clinical biomarkers over time, we found that patients from high-risk subgroups had higher odds of developing evolving hemoglobin and monoclonal protein levels over time (P = 0.01 and 0.002, respectively); Moreover, the absolute increase in M-protein was significantly higher in patients from the high-risk genetic subtypes at one, two, and five years from diagnosis (P = 0.001, 0.03, and 0,01, respectively). Applying the classifier to the external cohort replicated our findings where intermediate and high-risk genetic subgroups conferred increased risk of progression to MM in multivariate analysis after accounting for IMWG staging (HR: 5.5 and 9.8, P = 0.04 and 0.005, respectively). Interestingly, within the intermediate-risk clinical group in the primary cohort, patients in the high-risk genetic subgroups had increased risk of progression (HR: 5.2, 95% CI 1.5 - 17.3, P = 0.007). In the validation cohort, these patients also had an increased risk of progression to MM (HR: 6.7, 95% CI 1.2 - 38.3, P = 0.03), indicating that molecular classification improves the clinical risk-stratification models. Conclusion: We identified and validated in an independent dataset six SMM molecular subgroups with distinct DNA alterations, transcriptional profiles, dysregulated pathways, and risks of progression to active MM. Our results underscore the importance of molecular classification in addition to clinical evaluation in better identifying high-risk SMM patients. Moreover, these subgroups may be used to identify tumor vulnerabilities and target them with precision medicine efforts. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bustoros: Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Casneuf: Janssen: Current Employment. Kastritis: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Walker: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Davies: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dimopoulos: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Bergsagel: Genetech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: human CRBN mouse; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Yong: BMS: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Morgan: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Getz: IBM, Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Scorpion Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial: AbbVie, Adaptive, Aptitude Health, BMS, Cellectar, Curio Science, Genetch, Janssen, Janssen Central American and Caribbean, Karyopharm, Medscape, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Takeda, The Binding Site, GNS, GSK: Consultancy.
Abstract Background: The optimal duration of anticoagulation after a first unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) is uncertain. Anticoagulant therapy is highly effective at reducing the risk of recurrent VTE, but this clinical benefit is not maintained once anticoagulation is stopped. Current guidelines suggest considering indefinite anticoagulation in all patients with unprovoked who have a non-high bleeding risk. However, this is a weak recommendation based on limited evidence. Deciding whether patients with a first unprovoked VTE should be considered for indefinite anticoagulant therapy requires estimation of the long-term risk of recurrent VTE after stopping anticoagulation. This risk however, is poorly established, hindering decision making. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and prospective observational studies to determine the rate of recurrent VTE in the first year, in the second year, between years 2 and 5, and years 5 and 10; and the cumulative incidence for recurrent VTE at 2, 5 and 10 years after stopping anticoagulation in men and women with first unprovoked VTE, who had completed at least 3 months of initial treatment. Studies were identified through a comprehensive literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Data clarifications were requested from authors of eligible studies. Rates of recurrent VTE were calculated for each study from the total number of recurrent VTE events divided by the person-years of follow-up, and then pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Fourteen studies involving 6, 446 patients were included in the analysis. Among men with a first unprovoked VTE, the pooled rate of recurrent VTE per 100 person-years after stopping anticoagulation was 11.2 events (95% CI, 9.0-13.6) in the first year; 7.4 events (95% CI, 5.5-9.5) in the second year; 4.4 events/year (95% CI, 3.2-5.7) between years 2 and 5, and 3.8 events/year (95% CI, 1.6-6.9) between years 5 and 10 [Table 1]. Among women with a first unprovoked VTE, the pooled rate of recurrent VTE per 100 person-years after stopping anticoagulation was 8.6 events (95% CI, 6.5-11.0) within the first year; 5.2 events (95% CI, 3.5-7.2) in the second year; 3.0 events/year (95% CI, 1.6-4.7) between years 2 and 5, and 2.0 events/year (95% CI, 1.3-2.9) between years 5 and 10 [Table 1]. In men and women respectively, the cumulative incidence for recurrent VTE was 17.8% (95% CI, 14.0%-21.9%) and 13.4% (95% CI, 9.8%-17.4%) at 2 years, 28.2% (95% CI, 22.0%-34.4%) and 20.9% (95% CI, 14.0%-28.5%) at 5 years, and 40.8% (95% CI, 28.0%-53.9%) and 28.5% (95% CI, 19.5%-38.3%) at 10 years after stopping anticoagulant therapy [Table 2]. Conclusions: Among patients with a first unprovoked VTE who have completed at least 3 months of initial treatment, men have a higher long-term risk of recurrent VTE after stopping anticoagulation, and may be given greater consideration for indefinite anticoagulant therapy. Our findings affirm the importance of considering patient's sex in deciding the optimal duration of anticoagulation, and as such, emphasize the need for individualized, patient-centered approach for the long-term management of unprovoked VTE. Disclosures Carrier: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria. Weitz:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Research Funding. Schulman:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria. Couturaud:Pfizer: Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Actelion: Other: Travel Support; Intermune: Other: Travel Support; Leo Pharma: Other: Travel Support; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Travel Support. Becattini:Bayer HealthCare: Other: Lecture Fees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Lecture Fees; Bristol Meyer Squibb: Other: Lecture Fees. Agnelli:Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Personal Fees; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: Personal Fees; Bayer Healthcare: Other: Personal Fees; Pfizer: Other: Personal Fees; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Other: Personal Fees. Brighton:Glaxo Smith Klein: Other: Personal Fees; Novo Nordisk: Other: Personal Fees; Bayer: Other: Personal Fees. Lensing:Bayer: Employment. Prins:Pfizer: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Hutton:Cornerstone Research Group: Honoraria. Palareti:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Werfen: Speakers Bureau; Alfa-Wassermann: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Prandoni:Pfizer: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Büller:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding; Thrombogenics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Isis: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rodger:Biomerieux: Research Funding.
