Rituximab with High Dose Methotrexate in the Management of Primary Central Nervous System Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3090-3090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roopesh R. Kansara ◽  
Tamara Shenkier ◽  
Joseph M Connors ◽  
Alina S. Gerrie ◽  
Richard Klasa ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Outcomes of patient with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) remain poor despite high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)-based chemotherapy regimens. The addition of rituximab (R) to chemotherapy improves response rates and outcomes in patients with systemic B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. However, R does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier, and therefore its impact in patients with PCNSL is unknown. With disappointing outcomes, in 2006, we routinely started adding R to HDMTX for the treatment of PCNSL. Herein, we evaluated the outcome of patients receiving HDMTX with or without R. Methods: Patients diagnosed with PCNSL (DLBCL histology only) between January 2000 and December 2013, and who were treated with at least one cycle of HDMTX, were identified in the Lymphoid Cancer Database. Since January 2000, patients with PCNSL in British Columbia have been treated with HDMTX 8 g/m2 every 2 weeks, pro-rated for creatinine clearance. Responding patients received a maximum of 10 cycles. Beginning in December 2006, rituximab 375 mg/m2 is given every 2 weeks with HDMTX for a total of 4 doses. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time interval from date of diagnosis to first evidence of progression/relapse, death or last follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time interval from date of diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Results: A total of 82 patients were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 61years (range 18-80), 42 (51%) were >60 years old, 48 (59%) were male, 18 (23%) had elevated LDH and 50 (61%) had performance status > 1. Median largest mass size was 4cm (range 1-9). Concurrent ocular (7 patients), leptomeningeal (3 patients), and spinal cord (1 patient) involvements were seen. For treatment, 55 (67%) received HDMTX and 27 (33%) received HDMTX+R. Patients received a median of 4 (range 1-9) HDMTX cycles, with no difference between R versus no R groups. Ten (12%) patients (6 HDMTX, 4 HDMTX+R) received whole brain radiotherapy (RT), as part of initial treatment due to chemo-intolerance. In 79 patients evaluable for response, the overall response rate to initial treatment was 55%: CR 40%, PR 15%, SD 5%, and PD 41%. There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics or response rates between the two groups. A total of 14/32 patients (44%) relapsed after CR (all in the brain, including 1 to the contralateral eye) and 8/12 (67%) relapsed after PR (7 in brain, 1 to bilateral eyes). At 1st relapse/progression (N = 56), 39 (69%) patients received RT, 4 received repeat courses of HDMTX, 2 received high dose chemotherapy/autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and 1 received temozolamide + R. 10 patients were managed supportively. Four patients had a systemic relapse without involvement of the CNS (1 Breast, 1 testis, 1 axilla and 1 scalp). They received R-CHOP (3), CHOP then R-GDP and ASCT (1). After a median follow-up of 5 years (range 0.1 to 12.7) in living patients, the 5-year OS was 38% (SE 6%), with no difference between patients treated with or without R (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.40, 1.63; p= 0.55). The 5-year PFS was 20% (SE 5%), again with no difference between the two groups (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.47, 1.48; p= 0.54). In the subset of 50 patients receiving > 4 cycles of chemotherapy (34 HDMTX, 16 HDMTX+R), the addition of rituximab did not impact PFS (p= 0.36) or OS (p= 0.08). In the subset of 72 patients who did not receive WBRT as part of initial therapy (49 HDMTX, 23 HDMTX + R), the addition of rituximab did not impact PFS (p= 0.48) or OS (p= 0.47). Conclusions: Our preliminary data shows no advantage to the addition of systemic R on the outcomes of PCNSL, consistent with its known poor CNS penetrance. Improved treatment modalities for PCNSL are still warranted. Disclosures Shenkier: F Hoffmann-La Roche: Other. Connors:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Other. Gerrie:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Other. Klasa:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Other. Savage:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Other. Sehn:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Other. Villa:F Hoffmann-La Roche: Other.

2007 ◽  
Vol 258 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Reni ◽  
Elena Mazza ◽  
Marco Foppoli ◽  
Andrés J.M. Ferreri

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii120-ii121
Author(s):  
Jun-ping Zhang ◽  
Jing-jing Ge ◽  
Cheng Li ◽  
Shao-pei Qi ◽  
Feng-jun Xue ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose methotrexate combined with temozolomide in the treatment of newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma. METHODS A retrospective study was performed to analyze the clinical data of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma treated with high-dose methotrexate plus temozolomide in the Department of Neuro-oncology, Capital Medical University, Sanbo Brain Hospital from May 2010 to December 2018. RESULTS A total of 41 patients were identified. Median age was 57 years (range, 27–76 years). The maximal extent of surgery was total resection in 6, partial resection in 8, and biopsy in 27 patients. Of the 35 patients with evaluable lesions, 32 achieved complete response (CR) and 3 achieved partial response. CR rate was 91.4%. The median follow-up time was 36.5 months (range, 4.9–115.4 months). After treatment, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 45.1 months. PFS rate at 1, 2, 5 years were 85.4%, 70.1% and 43.8%, respectively. The OS rate at 1, 2, 5 years were 92.7%, 82.4% and 66.5%, respectively. The median PFS of patients younger than 65 years was better than that of patients ≥65 years (98.8 months vs 27.9 months, p=0.039). There was no association between efficacy and extent of resection (p=0.836). After disease progression, 6 of the 21 patients received radiotherapy. There was no statistical difference in OS between the patients with or without radiotherapy (36.9 months vs 28.4 months). The main severe adverse events were myelosuppression (36.6%) and elevated transaminase (34.1%). Three patients were discontinued due to drug-related toxicities. CONCLUSIONS High-dose methotrexate combined with temozolomide is effective in the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma, with a low incidence of severe adverse reactions. This efficacy may be better than the historical control of methotrexate alone or methotrexate plus rituximab.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document