Benefit-Risk of Ponatinib Vs. Bosutinib in Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML) Patients Who Failed Two Prior Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs): An Indirect Comparison

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Prior to the introduction of bosutinib and ponatinib, CP-CML patients who had failed 2 prior lines of TKI had limited treatment options with generally poor treatment response and outcomes. These newer TKIs are important additions to the treatment armamentarium, but the optimal choice of 3rd-line (3L) treatment has not been established. Clinical trials in patients who have failed 2 previous lines of TKI suggest ponatinib is more efficacious than bosutinib, but with a less favorable side-effect profile, requiring a potential benefit-risk tradeoff in treatment choice. Comparison of overall benefit-risk from available clinical trial data is challenging due to single- arm designs, low overall mortality, disparate impact of characteristic side-effects, and the likely crossover/sequential use of alternative TKIs among patients discontinuing therapy. We therefore examined efficacy outcomes previously validated as predictors of long-term survival, as well as treatment duration and reason for study drug discontinuation, as surrogates for overall benefit-risk in 3L CP-CML patients treated with ponatinib vs. bosutinib. METHODS: Using clinical trial data for 3L CP-CML from Khoury 2012 for bosutinib and PACE (unpublished) for ponatinib, we examined efficacy outcomes including major (MCyR) and complete (CCyR) cytogenetic response, and major molecular response (MMR), durability of response, duration on therapy and reasons for discontinuation among patients treated with ponatinib vs. bosutinib after failing 2 prior TKIs. Outcomes were evaluated at similar follow-up time points: median 28.5 (range 0.3-56.2) months bosutinib; median 30.5 (0.2-39.8) months ponatinib. Efficacy outcomes were defined such that patients were required to demonstrate improvement relative to baseline to be counted as responders. Investigator-reported primary reason for discontinuation was examined and considered caused by treatment failure if due to death, disease progression or unsatisfactory response. RESULTS: Treatment response was higher for 3L CP-CML patients treated with ponatinib (N=98) than with bosutinib (N=118) across all measures. MCyR was achieved by 67% of ponatinib vs. 32% of bosutinib patients, CCyR by 56% of ponatinib vs. 24% of bosutinib patients, and MMR by 42% vs. 15%. Patients who received ponatinib experienced more durable responses with 93% of the ponatinib patients who achieved MCyR estimated to retain response after 2 years vs. 59% of the bosutinib patients who achieved this response level. After approximately 2.5 years of follow up, less than one-third (29%) of bosutinib patients remained on study drug vs. the majority (57%) of ponatinib patients (Figure). The median treatment duration was substantially shorter for bosutinib vs. ponatinib, with patients remaining on ponatinib therapy more than 3.5 times as long as on bosutinib (Figure). The majority of 3L bosutinib patients that discontinued did so due to treatment failure (58.3% of the patients who discontinued), while less than one-quarter (23.8%) of ponatinib patients who discontinued did so due to failure. The impact of AEs on discontinuation was similar: about 1 in 5 patients on both therapies discontinued due to AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Our indirect comparison using a variety of surrogate measures provides strong evidence of superior efficacy and durability of response with ponatinib vs. bosutinib in 3L CP-CML patients; the higher proportion of ponatinib patients continuing on therapy and the longer duration of therapy also suggest patients experience better overall response and tolerability outcomes with ponatinib vs. bosutinib. Based on the surrogate measures of patient benefit- risk examined in this analysis, ponatinib appears to provide a net overall benefit vs. bosutinib in 3L CP-CML patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Levy: ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, This ASH abstract publication value, advisory board speaking engagement, advisory board participation Other. McGarry:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huang:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nieset:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Safety, Efficacy, and Survival Findings From Comfort-II, a Phase 3 Study Comparing Ruxolitinib with Best Available Therapy (BAT) for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.801.801 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 801-801 ◽

Cited By ~ 21

Author(s):

Francisco Cervantes ◽

Jean-Jacques Kiladjian ◽

Dietger Niederwieser ◽

Andres Sirulnik ◽

Viktoriya Stalbovskaya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Extension Phase ◽

Spleen Volume ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 801 Background: Ruxolitinib is a potent JAK1 & 2 inhibitor that has demonstrated superiority over traditional therapies for the treatment of MF. In the two phase 3 COMFORT studies, ruxolitinib demonstrated rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly and improved MF-related symptoms and quality of life. COMFORT-II is a randomized, open-label study evaluating ruxolitinib versus BAT in patients (pts) with MF. The primary and key secondary endpoints were both met: the proportion of pts achieving a response (defined as a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume) at wk 48 (ruxolitinib, 28.5%; BAT, 0%; P < .0001) and 24 (31.9% and 0%; P < .0001), respectively. The present analyses update the efficacy and safety findings of COMFORT-II (median follow-up, 112 wk). Methods: In COMFORT-II, 219 pts with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF and splenomegaly were randomized (2:1) to receive ruxolitinib (15 or 20 mg bid, based on baseline platelet count [100-200 × 109/L or > 200 × 109/L, respectively]) or BAT. Efficacy results are based on an intention-to-treat analysis; a loss of spleen response was defined as a > 25% increase in spleen volume over on-study nadir that is no longer a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The median follow-up was 112 wk (ruxolitinib, 113; BAT, 108), and the median duration of exposure 83.3 wk (ruxolitinib, 111.4 [randomized and extension phases]; BAT, 45.1 [randomized treatment only]). Because the core study has completed, all pts have either entered the extension phase or discontinued from the study. The primary reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (AEs; ruxolitinib, 11.6%; BAT, 6.8%), consent withdrawal (4.1% and 12.3%), and disease progression (2.7% and 5.5%). Overall, 72.6% of pts (106/146) in the ruxolitinib arm and 61.6% (45/73) in the BAT arm entered the extension phase to receive ruxolitinib, and 55.5% (81/146) of those originally randomized to ruxolitinib remained on treatment at the time of this analysis. The primary reasons for discontinuation from the extension phase were progressive disease (8.2%), AEs (2.1%), and other (4.1%). Overall, 70 pts (48.3%) treated with ruxolitinib achieved a ≥ 35% reduction from baseline in spleen volume at any time during the study, and 97.1% of pts (132/136) with postbaseline assessments experienced a clinical benefit with some degree of reduction in spleen volume. Spleen reductions of ≥ 35% were sustained with continued ruxolitinib therapy (median duration not yet reached); the probabilities of maintaining the spleen response at wk 48 and 84 are 75% (95% CI, 61%-84%) and 58% (95% CI, 35%-76%), respectively (Figure). Since the last report (median 61.1 wk), an additional 9 and 12 deaths were reported in the ruxolitinib and BAT arms, respectively, resulting in a total of 20 (14%) and 16 (22%) deaths overall. Although there was no inferential statistical testing at this unplanned analysis, pts randomized to ruxolitinib showed longer survival than those randomized to BAT (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27–1.00). As expected, given the mechanism of action of ruxolitinib as a JAK1 & 2 inhibitor, the most common new or worsened grade 3/4 hematologic abnormalities during randomized treatment were anemia (ruxolitinib, 40.4%; BAT, 23.3%), lymphopenia (22.6%; 31.5%), and thrombocytopenia (9.6%; 9.6%). In the ruxolitinib arm, mean hemoglobin levels decreased over the first 12 wk of treatment and then recovered to levels similar to BAT from wk 24 onward; there was no difference in the mean monthly red blood cell transfusion rate among the ruxolitinib and BAT groups (0.834 vs 0.956 units, respectively). Nonhematologic AEs were primarily grade 1/2. Including the extension phase, there were no new nonhematologic AEs in the ruxolitinib group that were not observed previously (in ≥ 10% of pts), and only 1 pt had a new grade 3/4 AE (epistaxis). Conclusion: In COMFORT-II, ruxolitinib provided rapid and durable reductions in splenomegaly; this analysis demonstrates that these reductions are sustained over 2 years of treatment in the majority of pts. Ruxolitinib-treated pts showed longer survival than those receiving BAT, consistent with the survival advantage observed in previous (Verstovsek et al. NEJM. 2012) and current analyses of COMFORT-I, as well as with the comparison of pts of the phase 1/2 study with matched historical controls (Verstovsek et al. Blood. 2012). Disclosures: Cervantes: Sanofi-Aventis: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Celgene: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Pfizer: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Teva Pharmaceuticals: Advisory Board, Advisory Board Other; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: AdvisoryBoard Other, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding. Niederwieser:Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Sirulnik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stalbovskaya:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. McQuity:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hunter:Incyte: Employment. Levy:Incyte: Employment, stock options Other. Passamonti:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barbui:Novartis: Honoraria. Gisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharma AG: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Knoops:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Harrison:Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; YM Bioscience: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Is Adherence to the American College of Chest Physicians Recommended Anticoagulation Treatment Duration Associated with Different Outcomes Among Patients with Venous Thromboembolism?

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1126.1126 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1126-1126 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alex C. Spyropoulos ◽

Ron Preblick ◽

Jackie Kwong ◽

Melissa Lingohr-Smith ◽

Jay Lin

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Baseline Period ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Minimum Duration ◽

Study Population ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major clinical and economic burden. The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) Guideline 9th Edition on the treatment of VTE recommends a minimum duration of anticoagulation (AC) therapy depending on patient risk profiles. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the clinical and economic outcomes associated with adherence to the AC treatment duration recommendation among VTE patients in the real world setting. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with at least 1 inpatient diagnosis or 2 outpatient diagnoses on two different dates of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), based on ICD-9-CM codes, were identified from the IMS Pharmetrics Plus database during 1/1/2009 through 3/31/2013. The first VTE diagnosis was defined as the index event. Study patients were required to have continuous insurance coverage during the 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the index event and no prior VTE diagnosis in the baseline period. They were also required to have received at least one outpatient anticoagulant treatment within 30 days of the initial VTE diagnosis with a minimum medication days of supply of 30 days. ACCP recommend that patients with provoked VTE or unprovoked VTE and high bleeding risks receive AC treatment for at least 3 months and that patients with unprovoked VTE and low or moderate bleeding risks or patients with cancer receive AC treatment for at least 6 months. Patient records in the database including ICD-9-CM codes and RIETE bleeding risk scores were used to group patients into 2 cohorts, one comprised of patients who received AC treatment for a duration as recommended by the ACCP (adherent group, AD) and the other comprised of patients who received AC treatment for a duration less than that recommended by the ACCP (non-adherent group, non-AD). Patient demographics and clinical characteristic were evaluated during the baseline period. Healthcare resource utilization, including hospital admissions, outpatient medical services, and prescription drug usage, were measured during the baseline and follow-up periods. VTE recurrence, defined as hospitalization or ER visit with a VTE diagnosis code, was also measured during the follow-up period. Multivariate regression analysis was utilized to compare clinical and economic outcomes of study cohorts while controlling for key patient characteristics. Results: The study population included 81,827 patients with a mean age (standard deviation) of 55.3 (13.8) years. For the index VTE event, 61% had DVT only, 26% had PE only, and 13% had DVT/PE. Of the study population, the minimum ACCP recommended AC treatment durations were 3 and 6 months for 27% (n=22,157) and 73% (n=59,670) of patients, respectively. Among all patients, 74% (n=60,550) received AC therapy for the ACCP recommended duration. The proportion of patients with VTE risks, including recent hospitalization (17% vs. 9%, p<0.001), recent surgery (9% vs. 6%, p<0.001), index diagnosis of PE only (28% vs. 20%, p<0.001), and index diagnosis of DVT/PE (15% vs. 8%, p<0.001) was greater in the AD cohort than in the non-AD cohort. Furthermore, mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score (1.67 vs. 1.59, p<0.001) and RIETE bleeding risk score (RIETE ≥1: 66% vs. 55%, p<0.001) were higher for the AD cohort compared to the non-AD cohort. The most prevalent anticoagulants used for treatment were warfarin (89% vs. 96%, p<0.001) and low molecular weight heparin (58% vs. 59%, p<0.01). After controlling for key patient characteristics, risks for all-cause hospitalization (Odds ratio (OR): 0.80, confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.83, p<0.001) and VTE recurrence (OR=0.91, CI: 0.86-0.95, p<0.001) were lower among VTE patients in the AD cohort vs. the non-AD cohort, as were differences in all-cause total healthcare payments (-$3,416, p<0.001) and VTE-related healthcare payments (-$2,139, p<0.001) during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Approximately a quarter of the study population with VTE did not receive treatment with AC therapy for the minimum duration as recommended by the ACCP guideline. Patients who did not receive outpatient AC therapy for the recommended duration had more VTE recurrences, utilized more inpatient services, and had higher healthcare costs than patients who received AC therapy for the ACCP recommended duration. Disclosures Spyropoulos: Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Consultancy. Preblick:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kwong:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lingohr-Smith:Chimerix, Inc.: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc: Consultancy; Novosys Health: Employment. Lin:Chimerix, Inc.: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novosys Health: Employment.

Download Full-text

Romiplostim in Thrombocytopenic Patients with Low- or Int-1- Risk MDS Results in Reduced Bleeding without Impacting Leukemic Progression: Final Follow-up Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.2000.2000 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 2000-2000

Author(s):

Hagop Kantarjian ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Jeffrey Szer ◽

Uwe Platzbecker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Study Drug ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Bleeding Events ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Thrombocytopenia occurs in ~50% of patients with low/int-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and is associated with reduced survival. In a placebo (PBO)-controlled study, 250 patients with MDS were randomized 2:1 to receive weekly romiplostim or PBO. In the original June 2011 analysis, romiplostim reduced clinically significant bleeding events [hazard ratio (HR) romiplostim vs PBO 0.83, 95% CI: 0.66−1.05, P = 0.13] and platelet transfusions (relative risk 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66−0.88, P<0.001) and increased IWG hematologic improvement platelets (HI-P) incidence (odds ratio 15.6, 95% CI: 4.7−51.8, P<0.001). Peripheral blast count increases >10% were more frequent with romiplostim (25/167, 15%) than PBO (3/83, 3.6%) and resolved after discontinuation in most cases. In February 2011, the DMC recommended that treatment with study drug be discontinued as the potential benefit seen in the reduction of bleeding did not outweigh the potential risk for disease progression to AML, and that transient increases in blast cell counts might put patients at risk for diagnosis of and treatment for AML. Patients were moved into long-term follow-up (LTFU). Previously reported (Giagounidis et al, Cancer 2014) 58-week incidence of AML was 6.0% (N = 10) for romiplostim and 4.9% for PBO (N = 4); HR 1.20 (95% CI: 0.38−3.84). This report provides final 5-year LTFU data. Methods: Eligible patients were receiving only supportive care and had IPSS low/int-1 risk MDS and platelets 1) ≤20 × 109/L or 2) ≤50 × 109/L with a history of bleeding. Disease progression to AML was defined as 1) ≥20% blasts in bone marrow or peripheral blood after 4 weeks following discontinuation of romiplostim; 2) pathology consistent with leukemia; or 3) antileukemic treatment. Results are presented by treatment group. Results: At baseline, median (Q1, Q3) age was 70 (61, 77) years, the majority (59%) of patients were male; 27.6% were IPSS low risk and 72.4% were int-1 risk. WHO classifications were RCMD: 67.6%, RAEB-1: 13.2%, MDS-U: 11.2%, RA: 4.4%, RCMD-RS: 2.4%, RARS: 0.8%, and RAEB-2: 0.4%. Of 250 patients in the study, 210 entered LTFU and 66 completed the 5 years of LTFU; median (Q1, Q3) follow-up was 27.5 (10.8, 58.7) months. Reasons for discontinuation (death, lost to follow-up, and consent withdrawal) during LTFU were similar in both groups. During the active study period and LTFU, death was reported in 93 (55.7%) patients in the romiplostim group and 45 (54.2%) patients in the PBO group (HR romiplostim vs PBO 1.03, 95% CI: 0.72−1.47) (Figure); mortality rates were greater in those with IPSS int-1 vs low risk for both groups (Table). AML was reported in 20 (11.9%) patients in the romiplostim group and 9 (11.0%) patients in the PBO group (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.48−2.33). The proportions of patients who either died or developed AML were 56.9% (N = 95) in the romiplostim group and 55.4% (N = 46) in the PBO group (HR for AML-free survival 1.04, 95% CI: 0.73−1.48) (Figure). Nearly half (N = 14, 48%) of the 29 AML cases occurred in patients who were RAEB-1 at screening (none RAEB-2), and 6 cases were diagnosed because of anti-AML treatment use alone (Table). In LTFU, patient-reported use of MDS therapy (eg, azacitidine or cyclosporine) was 42.8% (N = 59, 95% CI: 34.4%−51.5%) in the romiplostim group and 31.4% (N = 22, 95% CI: 20.9%−43.6%) in the PBO group. AML therapy (eg, chemotherapy) was used in 14 (10.2%) patients in the romiplostim group and 7 (10.0%) patients in the PBO group. Conclusions: Following the decision in 2011 to stop study drug secondary to increased AML rates at that time and transient blasts increases, final 5-year LTFU HRs (romiplostim vs placebo) for death or progression to AML, respectively, are 1.03 (95% CI: 0.72−1.47) and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.48−2.33). In conclusion, romiplostim reduced bleeding events and platelet transfusions, with no increase in AML incidence or impact on survival. Disclosures Kantarjian: Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Fenaux:Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium/Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Szer:Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Australia: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Platzbecker:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; TEVA Pharmaceutical Industries: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kuendgen:Celgene: Research Funding. Gaidano:Morphosys: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wiktor-Jedrzejczak:Angelini: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Sandoz: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding. Carpenter:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mehta:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Franklin:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Giagounidis:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Follow-up of Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treated with Venetoclax Monotherapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117210 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2883-2883

Author(s):

Matthew S. Davids ◽

Andrew W. Roberts ◽

William G. Wierda ◽

Kathryn Humphrey ◽

Debbie J Alter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

Response Rate ◽

Study Drug ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mantle Cell ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Introduction: Venetoclax is a selective, oral inhibitor of BCL2, a key regulator of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. The dose-escalation phase 1 study of venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) enrolled 106 patients from June 2011, and the overall response rate across the entire NHL cohort was 44%. The highest response rate (75%) was seen in the 28 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (Davids et al., J Clin Oncol. 2017). Here, we report longer-term outcomes for those patients, now with a median of 27 months (range: 0.2 - 59) follow up. Methods: Venetoclax was administered in dose cohorts ranging from a maximum dose of 300-1200 mg and continued until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity; intra-patient dose escalation was allowed. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed by NCI-CTCAE v4.0 and responses were assessed using 2007 Cheson IWG response criteria, utilizing CT scans beginning at week 6. The data cut off for this analysis was June 4th, 2018. Results: For the 28 patients with MCL, the median age was 72 years (range: 35 - 85). They had received a median of 3 (range: 1 - 7) prior treatments; 5 patients received prior PI3K inhibitor (but no prior ibrutinib). The median time from the preceding treatment to start of venetoclax was 13 months (range: 2 - 148). The median dose of venetoclax was 400 mg/day; 25/28 received at least 400mg/day. Median time on study drug was 11 months (range: 0.2 - 59). Three patients have been on therapy for over 4 years. The overall response rate was 75%, with 6 (21%) patients achieving complete remission (CR) and 15 (54%) partial response (PR). The median duration of response was 16 months (95% CI: 4, 30) and median progression free survival was 11 months (95% CI: 5, 21) for all patients (Figure). The 2 year PFS estimate was 30% (95% CI: 14%, 47%) for all patients, 83% (95% CI: 27%, 97%) for patients who achieved CR and 14% (95% CI: 2%, 37%) for patients who achieved PR. One patient who achieved PR proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant and remained disease free at the last protocol defined follow-up (24 months after coming off study). Three patients developed progressive disease after receiving venetoclax for more than two years of therapy (time to progression: 31, 33, and 33 months). Two patients with CR continue on study without evidence of progression, currently at 47 and 59 months of venetoclax monotherapy. The most common (≥25% of patients with MCL) all grade treatment emergent AEs were nausea (57%), diarrhea (50%), fatigue (39%), constipation (29%) and upper respiratory infection (25%). The most common (≥10% of patients with MCL) grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (14%), anemia (14%), pneumonia (11%), and thrombocytopenia (11%). Biochemical tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), without accompanying clinical features, was reported in one patient considered high risk for TLS. Specific interventions were not required, and the patient continued on study drug. Conclusions: Venetoclax monotherapy leads to durable remission in a meaningful proportion of patients with pretreated MCL. Further studies in MCL are currently investigating potential biomarkers for durable response to venetoclax combination regimens, including a Phase 3 randomized study with ibrutinib (SYMPATICO, NCT03112174). Disclosures Davids: Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; AbbVie, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; MEI Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Surface Oncology: Research Funding. Roberts:Walter and Eliza Hall: Employment, Patents & Royalties: Employee of Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research which receives milestone and royalty payments related to venetoclax; AbbVie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Wierda:Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding. Humphrey:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Employment, Equity Ownership. Alter:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Masud:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Buss:Abbvie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Verdugo:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Seymour:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Overall Safety and Treatment Duration in Lenalidomide (LEN)-, Thalidomide (THAL)-, and Bortezomib (BORT)-Treated Patients (Pts) within the European Post-Approval Safety Study (EU PASS) of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4068.4068 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4068-4068

Author(s):

Barbara Gamberi ◽

Charalampia Kyriakou ◽

John Ashcroft ◽

Miguel T. Hernandez ◽

Jo Caers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Practice ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Treatment Duration ◽

Treatment Discontinuation ◽

Study Entry ◽

Current Clinical Practice ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 4068 Background: The efficacy and tolerability of LEN in pts with RRMM has been demonstrated in 2 large, randomized, phase 3 studies (MM-009/010). BORT and THAL have also been shown to be effective for RRMM treatment. While many studies have described the safety of antimyeloma drugs in the clinical trial setting, few have addressed the issue of tolerability in current clinical practice. Aims: In this study, we compared the incidence of adverse events (AEs) of special interest, such as neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, venous thromboembolism (VTE), peripheral neuropathy (PN) and second primary malignancies (SPM) in pts treated with LEN versus other antimyeloma therapies for RRMM in current clinical practice. Additionally, duration of treatment was assessed in the context of therapy received just prior to study entry. Methods: In this post-approval, observational, non-interventional, EU PASS study, pts with RRMM were enrolled into either the LEN cohort (LEN-based therapy) or the background cohort (all non-LEN based therapies) at the investigators' discretion. Thromboprophylaxis was per local standard practice. AEs were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Assessments for SPM were to be conducted up to 36 months (mos) after treatment discontinuation. Results: As of May 2012, overall median follow-up was 5.7 mos (range 0.02–39.8), (6.4 mos LEN, 5.7 mos THAL, 4.9 mos BORT). There were 3107 pts across 268 institutions in 17 European countries enrolled: 2141 received LEN, 751 received BORT, 110 received THAL, and 105 received other therapies or had incomplete information on the treatment arm. 127 pts from the background cohort crossed over following the physician's decision to initiate LEN treatment as a subsequent therapy. Median age was 70 years (range, 25–95) and 54% were male. Most pts (65%) had good performance status (ECOG score 0–1); 17% had an ECOG score of 2–4. Median overall number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 0–6) and this was consistent across the cohorts: 53% had 2 prior therapies and 21% had ≥3. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 1397 (45.0%) had a grade 3–4 AE. Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 14%, 4%, and 5% of pts in the LEN, BORT, and THAL groups, respectively. Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia developed in 8%, 9%, and 3% of pts, respectively. In the LEN group, only 7% of pts (1% grade 3–4) reported PN (4% newly occurring) while receiving LEN (despite 36% of pts presenting with PN at baseline) compared with 28% (5% grade 3–4) with BORT (22% PN at baseline) and 16% (2% grade 3–4) with THAL (19% PN at baseline). Grade 3–4 VTE developed in 2.7% of pts in the LEN group, 0.7% in the BORT group, and 1.8% in the THAL group. Overall treatment discontinuation rates (including disease progression) were 70%, 85%, and 86% in the LEN, BORT, and THAL groups, respectively, with nearly identical discontinuation rates due to AEs (17%) in each group, and disease progression rates of 15–20%. SPM incidence was ≤1% overall and invasive SPM incidence rate per 100 patient-years (95% CI) was 1.4 (0.94 –2.09) at a median follow-up of 10 mos and was comparable across the cohorts. Incidence of death during the study was comparable with all treatments (LEN 6%, BORT 4%, and THAL 5%); the incidence of treatment-related AEs leading to death was 1.4%, 1.2% and 0.9%, respectively. The median treatment duration was 4.6 mos in the overall population; 5.4 mos in pts treated with LEN, 3.7 mos in pts treated with BORT, and 4.6 mos in pts treated with THAL. At a 5.7 mos median follow-up, 19.9%, 2.0%, and 14.5% of pts in the LEN, BORT, and THAL arms had a treatment duration of >12 mos; and 2.2%, 0.3%, and 0.9% had a treatment duration of >24 mos, respectively. In an analysis of study treatment by last therapy prior to study entry, patients receiving THAL or BORT followed by LEN had a median on-study treatment duration of 5.7 mos and 5.2 mos, respectively, independent of the line of treatment. In comparison, pts receiving THAL or BORT followed by BORT had lower median study treatment duration of 3.7 mos and 3.8 mos, respectively. Conclusions: Results of this non-interventional, observational study show that AEs were similar with all treatments except for higher rates of neutropenia and lower rates of PN with LEN, compared with BORT or THAL. Despite the current short overall follow-up, treatment duration within the LEN, BORT, or THAL groups appears to be unaffected by prior treatment received but was longer for LEN when compared with BORT or THAL. Disclosures: Küenburg: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rosettani:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ryder-Smith:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Treatment with the Thrombopoietin (TPO)-Receptor Agonist Romiplostim in Thrombocytopenic Patients (Pts) with Low or Intermediate-1 (int-1) Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS): Follow-up AML and Survival Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo (PBO)-Controlled Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.421.421 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 421-421 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Ghulam J. Mufti ◽

Pierre Fenaux ◽

Mikkael A. Sekeres ◽

Jeffrey Szer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Study Drug ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Survival ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 421 Background: There are few therapies for thrombocytopenia in MDS, which is found in ∼50% of pts with low/int-1 MDS and is associated with shortened survival. In a June 2011 analysis of a 58-wk study (2:1 romiplostim:PBO), romiplostim reduced clinically significant bleeding events (HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.66, 1.05, P = 0.13) and platelet transfusions (RR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.88), and increased HI-P rates (OR 15.6, 95% CI: 4.7, 51.8). Increases in peripheral blast counts to >10% were more frequent with romiplostim (25/167, 15%) than PBO (3/83, 3.6%), and in most cases resolved after discontinuation. Through 58 wk, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was diagnosed in 10 romiplostim pts (6.0%) and 2 PBO pts (2.4%) (HR 2.51, 95% CI: 0.55, 11.47); the differences for romiplostim vs. PBO 58-wk overall survival (OS) and AML-free survival were not statistically significant. This report updates the previous results, with a particular emphasis on AML incidence. Methods: Eligible pts had IPSS low/int-1 MDS and were receiving supportive care, with platelets 1) ≤20×109/L or 2) ≤ 50×109/L with a history of bleeding. AML progression was defined as: 1) ≥20% blasts in the bone marrow or peripheral blood after 4 wk off romiplostim, 2) pathology consistent with leukemia (eg, chloroma or leukemia cutis), or 3) anti-leukemic treatment initiation. Due to data monitoring committee concerns that the potential small benefit seen in the reduction of bleeding did not outweigh the potential risk for disease progression to AML and that transient increases in blast cell counts may put pts at risk for diagnosis of and treatment for AML, study drug was stopped in February 2011. Pts were then moved into the long-term follow-up (LTFU) portion of the study. At the time of the 2011 analysis, not all pts had been on study 58 wk, thus the 58-wk data have been updated with LTFU data. Results: Results are presented by randomization group, although study drug was stopped in February 2011. Of 250 pts in the study (randomized 2:1 romiplostim:PBO), 224 entered LTFU, and 134 remained on study as of July 2012; the median (Q1, Q3) follow-up was 17.8 (10.8, 25.1) months. Through 58 wk, the proportions of deaths were romiplostim: 18.0% (30 pts), PBO: 20.5% (17 pts), for an OS HR of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.48, 1.56). Since June 2011, 2 additional AML cases were reported in the PBO arm which occurred within the 58-wk study period, but were not recorded in time for the primary analysis in 2011. Updated 58-wk AML rates were romiplostim: 6.0% (10 pts), PBO: 4.9% (4 pts), for an HR of 1.20 (95% CI: 0.38, 3.84). The resulting AML-free survival rates were romiplostim: 19.8% (33 pts), PBO: 22.9% (19 pts), for an HR of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.49, 1.51). For data to date (beyond 58 wk), proportions of deaths were romiplostim: 38.3% (64 pts), PBO: 37.3% (31 pts), for an OS HR of 1.09 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.68). AML rates were romiplostim: 8.9% (15 pts), PBO: 8.5% (7 pts), for an HR of 1.15 (95% CI: 0.47, 2.85). The resulting AML-free survival rates were romiplostim: 39.5% (66 pts), PBO: 38.6% (32 pts), for an HR of 1.11 (95% CI: 0.72, 1.70) (Figure). Twelve of the 22 AML cases occurred in pts who were RAEB-1 and 5 cases were diagnosed by anti-AML treatment alone (Table). In LTFU, pt-reported rates of MDS therapy use (e.g., azacitidine, cyclosporine, and romiplostim) were romiplostim: 31.1%, PBO: 23.2%. Reported rates of AML therapy use (e.g., azacitidine and chemotherapy) were romiplostim: 6.0%, PBO: 7.2%. A retrospective review of all available bone marrow aspirates and biopsies, including samples from pts diagnosed as having progressed to AML, was conducted by an independent hematopathologist; analyses are ongoing. Conclusion: Following the 2011 decision to stop study drug, study results have been updated with more time on study. Specifically, with the additional AML cases in the PBO arm during the 58-wk study period and data from the LTFU period, the HRs for progression to AML were 1.20 and 1.15, respectively, in contrast with the finding of a year ago (HR of 2.51 for 58-wk). As LTFU continues, additional data will be evaluated. Safety concerns regarding risk of disease progression to AML are still being investigated. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Amgen: Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of romiplostim in MDS was examined in this trial. Mufti:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fenaux:GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sekeres:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Platzbecker:Amgen: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Kuendgen:Celgene: Honoraria. Gaidano:Amgen: Honoraria. Wiktor-Jedrzejczak:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; Genopharm: Speakers Bureau. Bennett:Onconova: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Ambit: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Meibohm:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership; Amgen: Consultancy; Ockham: Employment. Yang:Amgen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Giagounidis:GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase 2/3 Trial of Subcutaneously Administered Marzeptacog Alfa (activated) an Engineered FVIIa in Hemophilia with Inhibitors - Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Efficacy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-112567 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1198-1198

Author(s):

Howard Levy ◽

Levani Makhaldiani ◽

Genadi Iosava ◽

Johnny Mahlangu ◽

Marina V Kosinova ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prothrombin Time ◽

Half Life ◽

Research Funding ◽

Study Drug ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Spontaneous Bleeding ◽

Effective Prophylaxis ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: In hemophilia patients with inhibitors, hemostasis can be achieved using bypass agents: activated plasma-derived prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC), recombinant Factor VIIa (FVIIa), or emicizumab - that can only manage hemophilia A. Marzeptacog alfa (activated) (MarzAA), an engineered recombinant FVIIa with enhanced biological properties enabling subcutaneous (SQ) delivery was developed using a rational protein design approach. It has 7-fold increased catalytic activity and prolonged duration of effect demonstrated in a single-dose intravenous (IV) study that documented safety. Daily SQ dosing in dogs demonstrated achievement of stable trough levels of MarzAA that are believed to be effective for prophylaxis. Aims: Phase 2/3 Study MAA-201 (NTC03407651) will determine if SQ MarzAA can provide effective prophylaxis. This study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and is approved by recognized research ethics committees. Up to 12 subjects with inhibitors, who have an annualized bleeding rate ≥12 (ABR), and sign informed consent, will participate. Methods: After an 18 mg/kg MarzAA IV bolus, pharmacokinetics and coagulation parameters were measured for 24 hours followed by 30 mg/kg MarzAA SQ with pharmacokinetics and coagulation parameters measured for a further 48 hours to calculate bioavailability. Subjects then received daily 30 mg/kg MarzAA SQ for 50 days. If no spontaneous bleeding events occurred the subject proceeded to safety follow-up 3 weeks after the last dose. If spontaneous bleeding occurred, dose escalation occurred sequentially to 60, 90 or 120 mg/kg for 50 daily doses as needed (fig 1). Subjects were monitored for treatment-related changes in Quality of Life measures and tested for anti-drug antibodies to MarzAA and FVII weekly. ABR was compared to the subjects prior ABR. Results: 5 participants have been enrolled (Median ABR 16.6; Range 12.2-26.7) (fig 2). One participant with historical ABR 26.7 has completed the study with no bleeding at 60 mg/kg MarzAA but had a spontaneous bleed 16 days into the follow-up period when no longer receiving study drug. In a participant with previously-treated but currently-untreated and uncontrolled hypertension, a fatal hemorrhagic stroke deemed unrelated to study drug occurred on Day 11. Pharmacokinetics are shown in fig 3. IV half-life of 3.5 hours was increased to SQ half-life of 9.5 hours. Levels of MarzAA at Tmax 5 hours after SQ injection were similar to levels at 6 hours after IV infusion. Median subcutaneous bioavailability was 35%; Range 32.4-37.5%. Prothrombin Time baseline of 12-12.7 seconds fell to 8-9 seconds after 18 µg/kg IV infusion (normal 9.4-12.5 seconds). Prothrombin Time gradually declined to 8.7 seconds after 7 days of 30 µg/kg SQ injection. No anti-drug antibodies have been detected to date. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that an individualized dose of daily SQ MarzAA can provide effective prophylaxis in hemophilia patients with inhibitors. Supported by Catalyst Biosciences Disclosures Levy: Catalyst Biosciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mahlangu:Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; LFB: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Consultancy; Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biomarin: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Alnylam: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding. Del Greco:Catalyst Biosciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Booth:Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

173 Comparative effectiveness of secukinumab and golimumab in ankylosing spondylitis assessed by matching-adjusted indirect comparison using pivotal phase III clinical trial data

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/key075.397 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 57 (suppl_3) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Hasan Tahir ◽

Walter Maksymowych ◽

Ernest Choy ◽

Yusuf Yazici ◽

Jessica Walsh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽

Comparative Effectiveness ◽

Indirect Comparison ◽

Clinical Trial Data ◽

Trial Data ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Pivotal Phase ◽

Phase Iii Clinical Trial ◽

Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Download Full-text

Impact of Modified Thalidomide Dosing in Bortezomib/Thalidomide/Dexamethasone for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Are Transplant-Eligible: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122775 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 4739-4739

Author(s):

Pieter Sonneveld ◽

Maria-Victoria Mateos ◽

Adrián Alegre ◽

Thierry Facon ◽

Cyrille Hulin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Indirect Comparison ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Post Transplant ◽

Post Induction ◽

Adjusted Indirect Comparison ◽

Equity Ownership

Introduction: For patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are transplant-eligible, bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTd) is a standard of care (SoC) for induction and consolidation therapy. Clinical practice has evolved to use a modified VTd dose (VTd-mod; 100 mg thalidomide daily), which is reflected in recent treatment guidelines. As VTd-mod has become a real-world SoC, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) of the VTd-mod dose from recent clinical trials versus the dose included in the label (VTd-label; ramp up to 200 mg thalidomide daily) was performed to understand the effect on efficacy of modified VTd dosing for patients with NDMM who are transplant-eligible. Methods: For each outcome (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS], overall response rates [ORR] post-induction and post-transplant, and rate of peripheral neuropathy), a naïve comparison and a MAIC were performed. Data for VTd-label were obtained from the phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study (Rosiñol L, et al. Blood. 2012;120[8]:1589-1596). Data for VTd-mod were pooled from the phase 3 CASSIOPEIA study (Moreau P, et al. Lancet. 2019;394[10192]:29-38) and the phase 2 NCT00531453 study (Ludwig H, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31[2]:247-255). Patient-level data for PETHEMA/GEM and CASSIOPEIA were used to generate outcomes of interest and were validated against their respective clinical study reports; aggregate data for NCT00531453 were extracted from the primary publication. Matched baseline characteristics were age, sex, ECOG performance status, myeloma type, International Staging System (ISS) stage, baseline creatinine clearance, hemoglobin level, and platelet count. Results: Patients received VTd-mod (n = 591) or VTd-label (n = 130). After matching, baseline characteristics were similar across groups. For OS, the naïve comparison and the MAIC showed that VTd-mod was non-inferior to VTd-label (MAIC HR, 0.640 [95% CI: 0.363-1.129], P = 0.121; Figure 1A). VTd-mod significantly improved PFS versus VTd-label in the naïve comparison and MAIC (MAIC HR, 0.672 [95% CI: 0.467-0.966], P = 0.031; Figure 1B). Post-induction ORR was non-inferior for VTd-mod versus VTd-label (MAIC odds ratio, 1.781 [95% CI: 1.004-3.16], P = 0.065). Post-transplant, VTd-mod demonstrated superior ORR in both the naïve comparison and MAIC (MAIC odds ratio, 2.661 [95% CI: 1.579-4.484], P = 0.001). For rates of grade 3 or 4 peripheral neuropathy, the naïve comparison and MAIC both demonstrated that VTd-mod was non-inferior to VTd-label (MAIC rate difference, 2.4 [⁻1.7-6.49], P = 0.409). Conclusions: As naïve, indirect comparisons are prone to bias due to patient heterogeneity between studies, a MAIC can provide useful insights for clinicians and reimbursement decision-makers regarding the relative efficacy and safety of different treatments. In this MAIC, non-inferiority of VTd-mod versus VTd-label was demonstrated for OS, post-induction ORR, and peripheral neuropathy. This analysis also showed that VTd-mod significantly improved PFS and ORR post-transplant compared with VTd-label for patients with NDMM who are transplant-eligible. A limitation of this analysis is that unreported or unobserved confounding factors could not be adjusted for. Disclosures Sonneveld: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; SkylineDx: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mateos:Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, Adaptive: Honoraria; AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Biotech Inc, Mundipharma EDO, PharmaMar, Roche Laboratories Inc, Takeda Oncology: Other: Advisory Committee; Janssen, Celgene, Takeda, Amgen, GSK, Abbvie, EDO, Pharmar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Takeda Oncology.: Speakers Bureau; Amgen Inc, Janssen Biotech Inc: Other: Data and Monitoring Committee. Alegre:Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Facon:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Hulin:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen, AbbVie, Celgene, Amgen: Honoraria. Hashim:Ingress-Health: Employment. Vincken:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kampfenkel:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cote:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moreau:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Daratumumab (DARA) Maintenance Therapy Improves Depth of Response and Results in Durable Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Following Dara Plus Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (CyBorD) Induction Therapy in Multiple Myeloma (MM): Update of the Lyra Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122497 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 863-863 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Robert M. Rifkin ◽

Jason M. Melear ◽

Edward Faber ◽

William I. Bensinger ◽

John M Burke ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Depth Of Response ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Background: DARA, a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, is approved in combination with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone (VMP) and bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) for newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) and relapsed MM (RMM), respectively. CyBorD is a commonly used immunomodulatory drug-sparing regimen for MM. In the LYRA (NCT02951819) study, DARA plus CyBorD (DARA-CyBorD) demonstrated efficacy and a tolerable safety profile at the end of induction. Here, we present updated findings examining the effect of monthly DARA maintenance on the efficacy and safety of DARA-CyBorD in NDMM and RMM. Methods: LYRA is an ongoing, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study conducted at US community oncology centers. Patients (pts) were aged ≥18 years with documented MM per IMWG criteria, an ECOG performance score (PS) of 0-2, and ≤1 prior line of therapy. Pts received 4-8 induction cycles of DARA-CyBorD (cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 PO on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22; bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 SC on Days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone 40 mg PO or IV weekly [qw]) every 28 days. DARA was given at 8 mg/kg IV on Days 1 and 2 of C1, 16 mg/kg qw from C1D8 through C2, 16 mg/kg q2w for C3-6, and 16 mg/kg q4w for C7-8. After induction, eligible pts could undergo autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). All pts received up to 12 maintenance cycles with DARA 16 mg/kg IV q4w. Results: A total of 101 (87 NDMM, 14 RMM) pts were enrolled; 100 (86 NDMM, 14 RMM) pts received ≥1 treatment dose. Median age was 63 years; most pts were white (81%), male (64%), had ECOG PS 0-1 (94%) and had IgG (57%) MM; 36% of pts had high cytogenetic risk, defined as a del(17p), t(4:14) or t(14;16) abnormality. NDMM and RMM pts received a median of 6 and 8 cycles, respectively, of induction therapy. Thirty-nine NDMM pts and 1 RMM pt underwent ASCT. Fifty percent of pts received plerixafor; median stem cell yield for NDMM pts was 6.2 x 106 (range 2-15 x 106) CD34+ cells/kg. A total of 85 (75 NDMM, 10 RMM) pts received ≥1 dose of maintenance treatment; 63 (56 NDMM, 7 RMM) pts have received all 12 maintenance cycles. In NDMM pts, ORR was 87%, with 64% ≥VGPR and 12% ≥CR, by the end of induction. By the end of maintenance, ORR, ≥VGPR and ≥CR rates were 97%, 82% and 51% in NDMM pts who underwent ASCT and 83%, 70% and 30% in NDMM pts who did not receive ASCT. In RMM pts, ORR, ≥VGPR and ≥CR rates were 79%, 71% and 29% by the end of induction and 86%, 71% and 64% by the end of maintenance. At a median follow up of 24.8 mo in NDMM pts and 26.6 mo in RMM pts, median duration of response was not reached (NR). Median PFS (Figure) was NR in NDMM pts, regardless of transplant status, and was 21.7 mo in RMM pts; median OS was NR in NDMM pts and was 30.1 mo in RMM pts. In NDMM pts the 24-mo PFS rate was 89% in pts who underwent ASCT and 72% in pts who did not receive ASCT. The 24-mo OS rate was 90% for NDMM pts. In RMM pts, the 24-mo PFS and OS rates were 48% and 64%, respectively. All treated pts had ≥1 TEAE. Common TEAEs (≥25%) included fatigue, nausea, cough, diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infection, back pain, vomiting, insomnia, dyspnea, constipation, and headache. Grade 3/4 TEAEs were reported in 62% of pts; the most common (≥10%) was neutropenia (14%). Serious TEAEs occurred in 33% of pts; the most common (>2%) were pneumonia, atrial fibrillation and pulmonary embolism. TEAEs led to permanent treatment discontinuation in 7% of pts, with 2% related to treatment. TEAEs resulted in death in 2 pts (nephrotic syndrome, sudden death); both unrelated to treatment. Infusion reactions (IRs) occurred in 56% of pts including grades 1-2 in 52% of pts, grade 3 in 3% of pts and grade 4 in 1% of pts. Most common (>5%) IRs were chills, cough, dyspnea, nausea, pruritus, flushing and nasal congestion. Conclusion: Maintenance with DARA monotherapy for 12 mo increased the >CR rate in NDMM and RMM pts, consistent with observations in prior studies that longer DARA treatment improves depth of response. Importantly, the increase in ≥CR rate was associated with durable PFS and OS. The 24-mo PFS rates in NDMM and RMM pts compare favorably with results for DARA-VMP and DARA-Vd in NDMM and RRMM, respectively. Safety profile was consistent with previous reports of DARA, with no new safety concerns observed with longer follow-up. These data indicate that DARA-CyBorD is a safe, effective MM treatment and that DARA maintenance increases depth of response and achieves durable remissions. Disclosures Rifkin: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Melear:Texas Oncology: Employment; DARA: Speakers Bureau. Faber:Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bensinger:Amgen, Celgene: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda, Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Merck, Karyopharm: Other: Grant. Burke:Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Narang:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Stevens:Astellas: Consultancy. Gunawardena:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lutska:Janssen: Employment. Qi:Janssen: Employment. Ukropec:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Qi:Janssen: Employment. Lin:Janssen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yimer:Amgen: Consultancy; Clovis Oncology: Equity Ownership; Puma Biotechnology: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text