scholarly journals The Outcome of Mantle Cell Lymphoma patients after Treatment Failure and Prognostic value of Secondary Mantle Cell International Prognostic Index (sec MIPI)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4425-4425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marek Trneny ◽  
Pavel Klener ◽  
David Belada ◽  
Heidi Mocikova ◽  
Vit Prochazka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Single Drug ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background: MCL is a distinct lymphoma entity with improved outcome achieved by the introduction of rituximab, high dose Ara-C and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) into the first line therapy. The outcome of the relapsed patients (pts) remain however poor and there is little data on the outcome after subsequent relapses and there is no information on secondary MIPI prognostic value. Aim: To analyze the outcome of the MCL patients after first line treatment failure and to evaluate the prognostic role of the sec MIPI which is MIPI calculated at the time of relapse/progression. Methods: This analysis is a part of the Lymphoma project in which consecutive lymphoma patients are registered since the year 1999. Altogether 519 newly diagnosed MCL patients were registered in 5 university centers and 9 regional departments between 1999 and 2011. Patients who were treated with rituximab as part of the first line treatment (n=388) were included into the analysis. The diagnoses were confirmed according to WHO classification in the reference pathology centers. The median follow up is 4.5 years. Results: The whole cohort consists of 261 males and 127 females (2.1:1) with median age 65 y (28-87), the majority of pts had advanced disease (CS IV in 81.6% pts), PS ECOG ≥ 2 in 23.6% pts, elevated LDH in 52.5% of pts. The MIPI risk profile was as follows: low risk 21.7%, intermediate risk 27.2% and high risk in 51.1%. All pts received rituximab as part of the induction, 48.7% pts received CHOP, 5.7% alternation of CHOP and HD Ara-C, 26.2% intensive induction with HD Ara-C, 10.3% CVP, 6.4% FC. High dose therapy with ASCT was performed in 23.9% of pts. The ORR was 89.0% with 63.8 CR/CRu, 6.3% had stable disease and 4.9% were primary progressive. The PFS and OS were 2.9 y and 5.5 y with significant impact of MIPI risk (p<0.0001) for both PFS and OS. There were observed 179 relapses/progressions (R/P) and 70 deaths not related to subsequent progression. The cohort of patients with 1st R/P consisted out of 125 males and 54 females (2.3:1) with median age 68 years (38-89). The sed MIPI at the time of 1st R/P was low in 12.7% pts, intermediate in 32.1% and high 59.8% pts. Rituximab was used in 69.5% of patients, DHAP or ESHAP was used in 25.1% cases, FC in 22.8% of cases, CHOP like regimen in 9.4%, HD Ara-C in 11.8%, only 4.7% were treated with targeted therapy temsirolimus or lenalidomide. Altogether 77.2% pts were treated with the polychemotherapy and 22.8 with monotherapy. ASCT and AlloSCT were performed in 5.5% and 8.7% pts resp. During follow up there were observed 74 deaths not related to subsequent progression and 53 2nd R/Ps. The median of 2nd PFS and 2nd OS from the date of 1st R/P was 1.0 and 1.3 years resp. The sec MIPI low vs. intermediate vs. high risk had significant prognostic impact on 2nd PFS: 5.8 vs 1.7 vs 0.9 years (p<0.0001) (fig 1) as well as on OS : 5.8 vs 3.4 vs 1.1 years (p<0.0001) (fig 2). The cohort of 53 pts with 2nd R/P had median age 68 (38-85) yers, male/female ratio was 1.4. Rituximab was used in 45.9% of treated patients and 48.3% of pts were treated with single drug. During follow up 11 pts developed 3rd R/P and other 30 pts died due to current progression, toxicity or in remission. The median of 3rd PFS from the time of 2nd R/P was 6.8 m and OS 7.4 months. Pts who were treated for 3rd R/P recieved rituximab in 50% of cases and the majority (81.2%) were treated with other single drug. The median of 4th PFS from 3rdR/P was 4.9 m and OS 5.5 months . Conclusions: Our analysis of relapsed MCL patients shows that 1: Median PFS from the Dg was 2.9 y but each subsequent relapse resulted in significantly shorter PFS median 12.1, 6.8 and 4.9 months resp. 2: The median OS from Dg was 5.5y but after each relapse it became shorter - 15.7 m, 7.4 m and 5.5 months resp. 3: The sec MIPI at the time of relapse discriminates the groups with significantly different prognosis. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

First-LINE Treatment With High-Dose Dexamethasone Terapy For Adult Primary Inmune Thrombocytopenia

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1081-1081
Author(s):  
Dana Diaz-Canales ◽  
Maria Rosario Prieto-Bonilla ◽  
Maria Eva Mingot-Castellano ◽  
Ana Isabel Heiniger Mazo
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Median Time ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disorder with a very variable outcome. Bleeding manifestations and platelets count are considered the main criteria to start treatment in these patients. The initial recommended therapy are corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IgsIV). The aim of our study is the description of efficacy and safety of high-dose dexamethasone (Dx) used as frontline therapy in newly diagnosed ITP patients. Methods A series of patients diagnosed in our centre from March 2009 to August 2012 has been studied. They have received first-line treatment with Dx (40 mg/d four consecutive days every 2 or 4 weeks) for 1 to 6 courses. Sex, age, cardiovascular risk factors, reasons to treat, response, courses of treatment, complications and relapse rate were recorded and analyzed. Results Our series of twenty-nine patients, 18 women (62%) and 11 men (38%), had a median age of 54 years (range 16-92 years). Twenty-five patients (86%) were treated after low platelet counts (30x 10e9 / L) with or without clinical bleeding, whereas the other four patients were treated as a surgery preparation. One patient received a reduced dose of Dx (20 mg/d x 4 days) because of comorbidities and high risk of infection. In thirteen patients, IgsIV were added to Dx in the first course (1g/kg/d x 2 days), because of high bleeding risk or more severe bleeding at diagnosis. Platelets count at baseline was 15x109/ L (range 1-29 x109/ L). Ninety-three percent of patients responded after the first course of Dx (69% complete response CR, 24% partial response PR), and 45% of the patients did not require additional Dx treatment. The median time to reach a response was 5 days since the first day of treatment (range 2-60). The sixteen patients who need more than one course received a median of 4 (range 2-10), all of them without IgsIV. After a median follow-up of 14 months (range 2-45), 69% of these patients maintained the response without further treatment. Therefore, the overall response of the series reaches 83%. After 6 courses of treatment, 5 subjects did not achieved response and were classify as corticosteroid dependent. Of these, one patient was splenectomized and at present he remains at CR after 30 months of follow up. Another patient is waiting for splenectomy, and other three received thrombopoietin analogs, remaining all them in CR under treatment. Thirteen patients received a combination of Igs and Dx in the first course due to high risk of bleeding (platelets less than 20 x 10e9/L and hemorrhagic manifestations). Eleven of them (81%) achieved response (4 PR, 7CR) at a median time of 4 days (range 2–60). After the first course of treatment, 61% (8 of 13) of patients receiving both IgsIV and Dx responded, vs 35% (5 of 16) of those treated only with Dx. This difference was not statistically significant, probably because of the small number of patients in our series. All patients treated with IgsIV and Dx in the first course got the best response after 4 cycles of dexamethasone, compared to 75% of subjects treated with Dx for 4 to 6 courses. Dx was usually well tolerated, since only 13% of the patients experienced side effects: one case of hypertension, another patient developed hyperglycemia associated to corticosteroids and other two presented mild transient steroid psychosis episodes. Infectious events were not observed. Conclusions Treatment with high-dose dexamethasone as first-line treatment for ITP is a good alternative to prednisone because it shows a high efficacy and a good safety profile. In our experience, the association of IgsIV and Dx in the first course may improve the response rate and decrease the total dose of steroids needed to achieve a similar response. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Refractory eosinophilic fasciitis successfully treated with infliximab: A case report

2021 ◽  
pp. 239719832110043
Author(s):  
Paulina Śmigielska ◽  
Justyna Czarny ◽  
Jacek Kowalski ◽  
Aleksandra Wilkowska ◽  
Roman J. Nowicki
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Immunosuppressive Drugs ◽  
Unknown Etiology ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Eosinophilic Fasciitis ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Eosinophilic fasciitis is a rare connective tissue disease of unknown etiology. Therapeutic options include high-dose corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive drugs. We present a typical eosinophilic fasciitis case, which did not respond to first-line treatment, but improved remarkably after infliximab administration. This report demonstrates that in case of initial treatment failure, infliximab might be a relatively safe and effective way of eosinophilic fasciitis management.

Eltrombopag and High-Dose Dexamethasone As First Line Treatment For ITP

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3544-3544
Author(s):  
David Gomez-Almaguer ◽  
Miguel Angel Herrera-Rojas ◽  
Andres Gomez-de Leon ◽  
Olga Graciela Cantú-Rodríguez ◽  
Cesar H Gutiérrez-Aguirre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Immune Thrombocytopenia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Front Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disorder that involves antibody and cell mediated destruction of platelets as well as suppression of their production. Prednisone is the initial standard therapy in adults1. High-dose dexamethasone as front-line therapy given as pulses of 40 mg per day for 4 consecutive days, was effective in 85% of patients, nevertheless, 50% relapsed within six months2. The prices of ITP drugs for 1 month of treatment in an adult range from prednisone; $16, eltrombopag; $5,934, intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) (80 g); $9,648, to rituximab (2 g); $15,5963. Only prednisone/dexamethasone and eltrombopag are available in oral presentation, for this reason, ambulatory treatment is an alternative for these patients. The trombopoietin receptor agonists are effective for the treatment of patients with chronic ITP, although response is dependent on continued administration. Eltrombopag is a small molecule agonist of the c-mpl (TpoR) receptor, which is the physiological target of thrombopoietin. This drug effectively raises the platelet count in adult patients (aged 18 years and over) as second/third line therapy, that is for patients refractory to corticosteroids and IVIG who have had their spleen removed or when splenectomy is not an option4. Our group, as well as others, has previously sought to improve response rates in these patients, particularly with the use of rituximab5, 6. To our knowledge neither eltrombopag nor romiplostim have been used as front line therapy in ITP, therefore the purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of eltrombopag and dexamethasone in this setting. Patients and Methods This was a prospective, phase 2 study, using the combination of eltrombopag (50 mg PO once a day for 4 weeks) and high-dose dexamethasone (40 mg PO days 1,2,3,4) in untreated adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia or in patients with less than 7 days of treatment with corticosteroids. Complete response (CR) was defined as an increase in platelet count >100×109/L. Partial response (PR) was defined as an increase in the platelet count greater to 30 ×109/L according to standard criteria. Duration of response was considered from the day of initial administration to the first time of relapse (platelet count <30×109/L). Results Twelve consecutive patients were enrolled from June 2012 to June 2013, 6 women and 6 men. The median age at diagnosis was 50 years (range, 20 - 80 years). The median platelet count at diagnosis was 7 x 109/L (range, 2 - 29 x 109/L). Patients were followed for a median of 2.5 months (range 1.1 - 13). After steroid treatment at day +5, ten patients had responded (83.3%), five had achieved CR (41.7%), and five PR. After completing treatment with eltrombopag at day +34, all patients responded (100%), nine patients achieved CR (75%) and three PR (25%). Two patients relapsed in a median time of 39.5 days (range, 30.1 - 49), both regaining CR after treatment with another high-dose dexamethasone course and low-dose rituximab (4 doses of 100 mg every week). At 3 months follow-up 66.7% remained in CR and 33.3% in PR (n=6). At 6 months follow-up two patients remained in CR and two in PR (n=4). Time to best response achieved was 34 days from diagnosis (range, 19 – 64.1). At the end of follow-up 9 patients (75%) remained in CR and 3 patients in PR (25%). Total treatment cost per patient was $1,640 approximately. Conclusion Currently the initial treatment of ITP patients is based on prednisone or high dose dexamethasone with or without IVIG. This approach is associated with high cost and high relapse rate. The results from our pilot study suggest that high dose dexamethasone and eltrombopag are very effective as first line treatment for acute ITP in adults. This treatment is ambulatory, affordable and well tolerated; however, we still don't know if this approach will have a favorable impact on the relapse rate of this disease. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Eltrombopag as first line treatment for ITP.

Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Retrospective Study of the Geltamo Group (1994-2011)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3980-3980
Author(s):  
Ana García-Noblejas ◽  
Eulogio Conde ◽  
Alejandro Martín ◽  
María Jesús Vidal ◽  
Rafael Rojas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract INTRODUCTION Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is one of the current treatment options for first-line treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in young and fit patients in first complete response (CR). Nevertheless its role in less than CR, after intensive chemotherapy schemas or as consolidation after salvage regimens has not been established. AIM To analyze the impact of patient and treatment characteristics on outcome of MCL patients treated with ASCT. METHODS Retrospective analysis of MCL patients treated with ASCT and registered in the GELTAMO database from 1994 to 2011. An outcome up-date was performed on December 2013. The study was approved by local ethical committees. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0. RESULTS Two hundred and forty eight patients were registered from the GELTAMO database. Patients’characteristics : median age was 55 years old (range 21-70 y), 70% male. One hundred and fifty eight patients (68%) were transplanted in CR, 125 were in first CR (79% of all CR) and 33 in second or third CR (21%). Fifty two patients (22%) were transplanted in first partial response and 15 (6%) with chemosensitivity disease after relapse. Only 8 patients (3%) were transplanted with refractory disease. Response : forty-eight out of 75 patients (64%) without CR at ASCT converted to CR after transplant. Survival: Sixteen percent of patients were lost to follow-up one year after transplantation. Median follow-up for alive patients was 47 months (range 0-245 months). Progression free survival for patients transplanted in first CR was 45 months (CI95%: 33-56 months), for patients transplanted in first partial response (PR) was 28 months (CI95%: 15-21months) and for patients transplanted in other response was 19 months (CI95%: 12-26 months). In the whole series, median overall survival (OS) from transplantation was 69 months (CI95% 51-87 months) and for those patients transplanted in first CR was 98 months (CI95% 67-130 months). When patients without CR before transplant are analyzed separately, those who achieved CR after transplantation have better PFS (38 vs 10 months, p<0.001) and OS (74 vs 16 months, p<0.001) than others. Treatment related mortality was 4%. We analyzed the variables that could be associated with PFS and OS. We considered age (≤60 vs >60), ECOG (<2, ≥2), IPI (<2, ≥2), status at transplant (1st CR vs others), conditioning with TBI and HDAC in first line treatment. In univariate analysis, ECOG (p=0.04) and status at transplant (p=0.01) were the variables associated with PFS. For OS, the same variables resulted significant (p<0.001 and p=0.07, respectively) and also, HDAC emerged as significant variable associated with outcome. (p=0.05). In multivariate analysis, ECOG and status at transplant remained as independent prognostic factors for PFS while ECOG and HDAC in first line had impact for OS, see Table 1. Table 1. Variables identified as independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. PFS OS p RR (95% CI) p RR ECOG 0.01 3.6 (1.3-9.9) 0.04 4.5 (1.6-12.5) Status at trasplant 0.03 1.4 (1-2) 0.09 (ns) ---- HDAC at 1st line 0.7 (ns) ---- 0.014 0.5 (0.3-0.8) Afterwards, a survival analysis for PFS and OS was performed according to have received high dose AraC (HDAC) in first line treatment or not and disease status (DS) before ASCT (Table 2). Table 2. Survival analysis according to have received HDAC in 1st line treatment and disease status (DS) before ASCT DS before ASCT N Firts line treatment N PFS (CI95%)(Kaplan Meier) p OS (CI95%)(Kaplan Meier) p 1st CR 125 No HDAC 52 37 (22-51) 0.13 64 (37-91) 0.01 HDAC 72 56 (33-78) No reached 1st PR 52 No HDAC 35 33 (3-63) 0.59 61 (0-126) 0.9 HDAC 17 27 (18-37) 69 (46-92) ≠1st CR/PR 51 No HDAC 46 20 (13-27) 0.16 35 (5-66) 0.9 HDAC 5 11 (7-16) No reached CONCLUSION This retrospective study reproduces previous results published about the role of ASCT in MCL: ASCT consolidation in first CR induces high survival rates with a median PFS of 45 months and median OS of 98 months. Patients without CR after ASCT had a significant inferior outcome. ECOG < 2 and status at transplantation are crucial for PFS and first line treatment with AraC improves significantly OS, particularly in patients with first CR. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Zanubrutinib, Lenalidomide Plus R-CHOP (ZR 2-CHOP) As the First-Line Treatment for Diffused Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3559-3559
Author(s):  
Huayuan Zhu ◽  
Yeqin Sha ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Jingyan Qiu ◽  
Yilian Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Physical Condition ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
To Receive ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction To evaluate the safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib, lenalidomide plus R-CHOP (ZR 2-CHOP) as the first-line treatment for DLBCL patients, we conducted this single-arm retrospective observational study. Methods Treatment-naïve patients with DLBCL(including but not limited to double-hit, double expression) aged 18 to 75 years were enrolled.ZR 2-CHOP was given as follows, Oral zanubrutinib was given continuously (160 mg twice daily) from Day 0, lenalidomide 25 mg daily Day 1-7. Patients were administered intravenously rituximab (375 mg/m 2 Day 0), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m 2 Day 1), doxorubicin (50 mg/m 2 Day 1), vincristine (1.4 mg/m 2 Day 1), and oral prednisone (100 mg Day 1-5). All patients were recommended to receive 6 cycles of ZR 2-CHOP (R-CHOP or R 2-CHOP were allowed in cycle 1-2 due to poor physical condition at treatment) and patients older than 70 years old were administered ZR 2-miniCHOP (Figure 1). CT or PET-CT scans were applied to mid-term efficacy and PET-CT scan was conducted after 6 cycles. ctDNA was dynamically detected before treatment, after 3 and 6 cycles to evaluate tumor mutational burden. The primary endpoint was complete response ratio (CRR) at mid-term and after 6 cycles. The secondary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), ctDNA dynamics and adverse events (AE). AEs were graded based on CTCAE (version 5.0). Results 12 treatment-naïve DLBCL patients diagnosed in Pukou CLL Center were enrolled in this cohort between July 2020 and June 2021. The median age was 56 years old and all patients had ECOG-PS ≤2. 1 patient (1/12) was diagnosed as double-hit DLBCL and 9 patients (9/12) as double-expression. 10 patients were non-GCB and 2 were GCB. 7 patients were classified as high-intermediate and high-risk group according to NCCN-IPI (Table 1). At data cutoff (1st July, 2021), the median follow-up was 8 months (3-12 months) with all patients have completed at least 3 cycles and mid-term assessment has been conducted. The ORR was 100.0%, with 10 patients achieved CR and 2 patients achieved PR (both two patients received R-CHOP regimen in cycle 1/cycle 1-2 due to poor physical condition at initial treatment, Figure 1). 10 patients have received 6 cycles, all of them achieved CR (Figure 2). ctDNA was dynamically detected in six patients. The median number of detectable ctDNA mutation among six patients was 8 (0-12) with two patients classified as MCD subtype and one patients as EZB subtype. All six patients showed undetectable ctDNA after 3 cycles. During end of treatment follow-up, one patient (triple-hit, EZB) who scheduled to receive auto-SCT underwent disease progression 4 months later and reemergence of ctDNA showed previous homologous clones. The most common hematological toxicity events were lymphocytes count decreased, neutrophil count decreased, thrombocytopenia and anemia, with 3-4 level occurrence rate was 66.7%, 25.0%, 25.0% and 16.7%. The most common non-hematological toxicity events were nausea, fatigue and anorexia. One patients discontinued oral zanubrutinib and lenalidomide in last two cycles due to drug rash. Conclusion ZR 2-CHOP could attain high CR rate and ctDNA clearance in TN DLBCL, including patients with DEL and/or high-risk. The overall tolerability was manageable. ZR 2-CHOP could be one of the promising choice for TN DLBCL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: Zanubrutinib was used in the initial treatment of high-risk DLBCL.

scholarly journals Tacrolimus Plus High-Dose Dexamethasone Versus High-Dose Dexamethasone Alone As First-Line Treatment for Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia: The Phase 2, Open Label, Randomized Trial (TARGET 020)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 13-13
Author(s):  
Zhuo-Yu An ◽  
Ye-Jun Wu ◽  
Yun He ◽  
Xiao-Lu Zhu ◽  
Hong-Xia Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Monotherapy Group ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired, organ-specific, autoimmune disease and one of the most common bleeding disorders seriously endangering human health. Glucocorticoids and intravenous immunoglobulin are first-line treatments recommended by guidelines for patients with ITP. However, approximately 50%-85% of patients relapse during the first year of treatment. In addition, long-term use of glucocorticoids increases the risk for dose- and time-dependent glucocorticoid-related complications and serious side effects. Therefore, in-depth studies investigating new solutions for the first-line treatment of ITP are urgently needed. Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor, which forms a complex by binding to FK506-binding protein. It is currently widely used in the prevention of graft-versus-host disease for organ transplantation as well as for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. In addition to recent retrospective studies and case reports demonstrating its effectiveness in ITP, tacrolimus has been shown to improve anti-platelet antibody-mediated thrombocytopenia in mice, suggesting it may be a potential treatment for ITP. The aim of this study was to compare two first-line treatment options for ITP-a standard glucocorticoid-only regimen versus tacrolimus in combination with a standard glucocorticoid regimen-to determine which could help patients achieve stable platelet counts faster and experience a longer duration of remission. Methods This open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial, enrolled adult ITP patients from seven different tertiary medical centers in China. Elderly patients had confirmed, newly diagnosed, treatment-naive ITP, platelet counts &lt;30×10 9/L, or &lt; 50×10 9/L and significant bleeding symptoms (World Health Organization bleeding scale ≥ 2). Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 with an interactive web-based response system to receive either oral tacrolimus (initial 0.03 mg/kg/day and maintain blood concentration at 3-5 ng/mL for 12 weeks) plus high-dose dexamethasone (HD-DXM) or HD-DXM monotherapy for 12 weeks. DXM (40 mg) was administered orally daily for 4 consecutive days to both study arms. The 4-day course of DXM was repeated on days 11-14 in patients who lacked response by day 10. The primary endpoint was 6-month sustained response (SR), defined as platelet count maintained &gt;50×10 9/L without any additional ITP-modifying therapy at the 6-month follow-up. Key secondary endpoints included initial response by day 14 (OR, platelet count ≥30×10 9/L and at least 2-fold increase in baseline platelet count and absence of bleeding; and CR, platelet count ≥ 100×10 9/L), duration of response, bleeding scores, and adverse events (AEs). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04747080). Results Total 140 patients newly diagnosed with ITP were randomly assigned to either the tacrolimus plus HD-DXM (n=72) or HD-DXM monotherapy (n=68) groups. At the 6-month follow-up, the proportion of patients exhibiting SR was significantly higher in the tacrolimus plus HD-DXM group than in the HD-DXM monotherapy group (65.3% vs 42.6%, p= 0.007). Of the 140 patients with ITP (males accounted for 48.6%), the mean age was 32.8 years, the mean platelet count was 16.7×10 9/L. The combination group exhibited a higher 14-day early remission rate than the monotherapy group (76.4% vs 55.9%, P=0.001). Significantly fewer treatment failures occurred in patients randomly assigned to the combination group(19.4% vs 38.2%, P=0.0014). During the follow-up period, fewer patients in the combination group experienced relapse than in the monotherapy group; the median time to relapse was 77 days (Tacrolimus+HD-DXM) vs 36 days (HD-DXM). The combination group exhibited a lower proportion of bleeding events and a lower bleeding score. The incidence of serious AEs, rescue therapy, and treatment side effects were similar between the two groups, and treatment was well tolerated by all patients, with no grade 4 AEs or treatment-related deaths reported. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of treatment-related AEs between the two groups. Conclusions Low-dose tacrolimus plus HD-DXM was an effective and safe treatment for ITP as first-line therapy and elicited a sustained prolonged response in adults. This therapy may be a new treatment option for adult patients with ITP. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare. OffLabel Disclosure: It includes information or discussion of off-label drug use of tacrilimus.

Long-Term Follow-Up of the Randomized GITMO/IIL Trial Comparing CHOP-Rituximab vs. High-Dose Therapy with Rituximab (R-HDS) in High Risk Follicular Lymphoma (Fl): Updated Results Suggest the Use of R-HDS as Salvage Treatment.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 20-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Ladetto ◽  
Federica De Marco ◽  
Fabio Benedetti ◽  
Umberto Vitolo ◽  
Caterina Patti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Bulky Disease

Abstract Background. A randomised trial has been performed among several GITMO/IIL italian centers, comparing Rituximab-supplemented High-Dose Sequential Chemotherapy (R-HDS) and CHOP-R in high-risk FL &lt;60 yrs. The updated results are here presented, after a median follow-up of 50 months. Patients (pts) and Methods. Eligibility was based on age-adjusted IPI &gt;=2 (125 pts) or on the IIL score &gt;=3 (11 pts). 136 pts were randomized (68/arm). Main clinical features were: median age 51 yrs. (22–59), stage III–IV 98%, elevated LDH 59%, bulky disease 56%, B symptoms 47%, extranodal disease other than bone marrow (BM) 31%, PS &gt;1 (ECOG) 60%. Both R-HDS and CHOP-R have been already described (Ladetto et al ASH 2005, Rambaldi et al Blood 2000). Cross-over was allowed for pts failing CHOP-R. Centralized minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis with the bcl-2/IgH was performed on BM samples. Analysis was intention to treat. Results. Early toxic deaths were 5 (2 in CHOP-R, 3 in R-HDS); CR rates were 61% with CHOP-R and 85% with R-HDS (p&lt;0.001). At four years EFS and PFS are 32% and 33% for CHOP-R, and 64% and 76% for R-HDS (p&lt;0.001). Despite a better EFS, OS is not different in the two arms (82% CHOP-R and 79% R-HDS). One fatal secondary myelodysplastic syndrome occurred in the CHOP-R arm and five (three fatal) in the R-HDS arm with a cumulative incidence at four years of 3.3% and 7.9% respectively. A stable molecular remission (MR) (achieved in 44% of CHOP-R and 80% of R-HDS pts) (p&lt;0,001) was associated with an improved PFS (22% vs 78% at four years) (p&lt;0,001) and proved the strongest outcome predictor for EFS and PFS by multivariate analysis (Hazard Ratio: 3.98 and 3.83, respectively). Interestingly, the PFS of PCR-negative pts was similar in the two arms, as well as that of PCR-positive pts. Of 39 patients with relapsed or refractory disease after CHOP-R 28 were crossed to R-HDS (71%). Reasons for not undergoing cross-over were: limited relapse in 4, co-morbidities in 2, refusal in 2, other causes in 3. Overall CR rate for second line treatment after CHOP-R failure was 77% (86% with R-HDS and 54% with other therapy). At a median follow-up of 30 months the three-year EFS of patients undergoing salvage R-HDS is 70%. Conclusions: In high-risk FL: a) first-line R-HDS ensures better EFS and PFS and superior molecular outcome than CHOP-R; b) pts undergoing salvage R-HDS have an excellent clinical outcome; c) the long-term OS is markedly improved compared to the pre-rituximab era, with no difference between CHOP-R and R-HDS; d) both the high efficacy as salvage treatment and the potential side effects suggest that the ideal positioning of R-HDS-like treatments is beyond first line treatment, for relapsed or refractory disease; e) a PCR-negative status is the most important prognostic factor regardless of treatment received and pts with persistent PCR-positivity might potentially be considered for specific experimental intervention.

scholarly journals Ofatumumab-Bendamustine As First Line Treatment for Elderly Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Phase II Risk Adapted Design with Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1751-1751
Author(s):  
Carla Casulo ◽  
Augustine Iannotta ◽  
Jannelle Walkley ◽  
Craig H. Moskowitz ◽  
Alison J Moskowitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a heterogeneous disease and risk-stratification of patients (pts) for treatment is not performed routinely. For older pts ineligible for aggressive treatments, comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGA) are recommended but not routinely implemented into practice. Commonly used chemo-immunotherapeutic options result in low rates of complete remission (CR) (40%-50% bendamustine-rituximab; Rummel et al Lancet 2013; Flinn et al Blood 2014), with frequent relapses. Risk-stratification of older MCL pts through biological and clinical characteristics may improve treatment outcomes and reduce toxicity. Ofatumumab may have an advantage over rituximab given more efficient complement activation and complement dependent cytotoxicity. To test this we designed a phase II risk-stratified study of ofatumumab alone or in combination with bendamustine as first line treatment for elderly MCL with the goal of improved remission rates and extended survival. Methods: This was a single-institution phase II study. The primary objective was response. Eligible pts were 65 years of age or older with untreated MCL and/or ineligible for aggressive treatments such as high dose chemotherapy/autologous stem cell transplant. Patients were risk-stratified for therapy. Low risk pts with no GELF/NCCN criteria, low/intermediate risk MIPI, Ki-67 index < 30% and no blastic morphology received single agent ofatumumab weekly for 4 doses. High risk pts with GELF/NCCN criteria present, high risk MIPI, Ki-67 index > 30% or blastic morphology received ofatumumab and bendamustine (O-B) every 28 days for 6 cycles. A simon-two stage design was implemented requiring 6 of 12 pts to have a CR in the O-B arm to proceed. Pts receiving ofatumumab only were permitted to cross over to O-B for less than a partial response (PR) at restaging. Survival probability was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. CGA was performed prior to each cycle, and correlation to treatment toxicity was evaluated as a secondary endpoint. Results: Twenty pts in total were enrolled. Median age was 73 (range: 44-83). Seven pts (35%) were classified as low risk and received single agent ofatumumab. Thirteen pts (65%) were classified as high risk and received O-B. All patients in the O-B arm completed 6 cycles of treatment, all met GELF/NCCN criteria. Of these, 54% had high risk MIPI, 54% had Ki67 ≥30%. Among pts receiving single agent ofatumumab, 71% (5 pts) had < PR (stable disease), 1 had CR (14%), and 1 pt was not evaluable. Three pts with < PR crossed over to the O-B arm. Among 12/16 evaluable pts (3 too early, 1 withdrew) in the O-B arm; overall response rate was 92%; CR rate was 67%, PR rate 25%. One patient had stable disease (8%). After median follow-up of 1.8 years (range 0.1-2.6 years), overall survival in the entire group is 100%. Progression free survival at 2 yrs for the O-B arm is estimated at 68%. Both regimens were safe and well tolerated. Incidence of grade 3/4 serious adverse effects was 15% (3 of 22 patients), all in the O-B group. Baseline CGA identified patients as low (n=15) and medium risk (n=3) for grade 3/4 toxicity, with all three SAE (pneumonia, UTI, SVT) occurring in medium risk patients (p=0.001). Baseline timed-up and go showed a trend for anticipated toxicity for patients in the worst quartile (p=0.11). Conclusions: The combination of ofatumumab and bendamustine has promising activity in elderly pts with high risk MCL, with superior CR rates compared to historical chemo-immunotherapeutic regimens. Single agent ofatumumab had modest activity, but was safe in low risk pts and did not impact responses to chemoimmunotherapy. CGA assessment may help predict toxicity. Ofatumumab-bendamustine is effective as first line treatment for older pts with MCL and holds promise as a platform for combination with novel agents in prospective trials of untreated MCL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Off Label Use: Ofatumumab is an anti CD20 monocloncal antibody not approved for use in mantle cell lymphoma. Moskowitz:Genentech: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Zelenetz:Foundation Medicine, Inc: Consultancy. Hamlin:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Bendamustine plus rituximab (B-R) versus CHOP plus rituximab (CHOP-R) as first-line treatment in patients with indolent and mantle cell lymphomas (MCL): Updated results from the StiL NHL1 study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias J. Rummel ◽  
Norbert Niederle ◽  
Georg Maschmeyer ◽  
Andre G. Banat ◽  
Ulrich von Gruenhagen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Indolent Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
First Line Treatment

3 Background: This multicenter, randomized, phase III study compared B-R and CHOP-R as first-line treatment in indolent lymphoma and MCL and was presented at ASH 2009 including a comprehensive safety analysis. Here we present an updated analysis with a cut-off date for 31 Oct 2011. Methods: 549 patients (pts) with indolent or MCL were randomized to receive B-R or CHOP-R for a max of 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS. Results: 514 pts randomized pts were evaluable (261 B-R; 253 CHOP-R). Patient characteristics were well balanced between arms; median age was 64 years. At a median follow-up of 45 months, PFS was significantly prolonged with B-R compared with CHOP-R (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44–0.74; P<0.001). Median PFS was 69.5 versus 31.2 months, respectively. The PFS benefit with B-R was maintained in all histological subtypes except marginal zone lymphoma. The PFS benefit with B-R was independent of age; HR 0.52 (P=0.002) in pts ≤60 years (n=199), and HR 0.62 (P=0.002) in pts >60 years (n=315). In pts with normal LDH (62%), PFS was significantly prolonged with B-R compared with CHOP-R (P<0.001), while in the elevated LDH group (38%) PFS was numerically, but not significantly increased with B-R compared with CHOP-R (P=0.118). In patients with follicular lymphoma, FLIPI subgroups defined by 0–2 factors (favorable) and 3–5 factors (unfavorable) had a longer PFS with B-R than with CHOP-R (P=0.043 and P=0.068 for the favorable and unfavorable FLIPI subgroups, respectively). Seventy four salvage treatments had been initiated in the B-R group; compared with 116 in the CHOP-R group, of those in the CHOP-R group 52 pts received B-R as salvage regimen. Overall survival did not differ between the treatment arms, with 43 and 45 deaths in the B-R and CHOP-R arms, respectively. Twenty secondary malignancies were observed in the B-R group compared with 23 in the CHOP-R group, with 1 hematological malignancy in each group (1 MDS in B-R, 1 AML in CHOP-R). Conclusions: In patients with previously untreated indolent lymphoma, and elderly patients with MCL, B-R demonstrates a PFS benefit and improved tolerability compared with CHOP-R.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document