Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM)

Abstract Background. Lenalidomide has proved safe and effective in multiple myeloma (MM), particularly in elderly patients. Furthermore, it has been showed that lenalidomide enhanced rituximab-mediated antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Unexpectedly, lenalidomide (25 mg/d on days 21/28) along with rituximab (375 mg/m²/wk) produced clinically significant acute anemia in patients with WM, most of them received 25mg/day with no improvement when the dose was reduced (Treon et al. CCR, 2009). No cause was attributable to the occurrence of this adverse event. Thus, we sought to perform a study with incremental concentrations of single agent lenalidomide to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of lenalidomide in WM, and possibly unravel the cause of anemia upon treatment with lenalidomide. Methods. RV-WM-0426 is a multicenter phase I/II dose escalation open label study of lenalidomide in relapse/refractory WM. Lenalidomide was given oral daily 21 / 28 days per cycles for 1 year, at escalated dose of 15 to 20 then 25mg across cohorts of 3 to 6 patients each during the phase 1 part, then followed by 9 patients to recruit in the phase 2 part at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The primary endpoint was the MTD, secondary endpoint included response rate (International WM Workshop) and response duration, safety, measurements of free light chain assays, and PFS and OS. Results. 17 patients were enrolled in the study, the median age was 69 (range 48-81), with 7 patients older than 75, 70% were male. 53% had adverse IPSS 3. The median hemoglobin level was 11.2 (95%CI 9.9-12.5), median M spike level 26.5 (95%CI 23-40), 23% had clearance creatinin below 60ml/min. The median number of prior lines was 1 (range 1-8), all patients but 2 exposed to alkylating agents, 30% to nucleoside analogues, 47% to the monoclonal antibody mabthera, none of the patients have had a transplantation. The median time from diagnosis to study entry was 3 years (range 2-15). At the highest dose tested, 20 mg, 2 patients had dose-limiting toxicity, septic syndrome during grade 4 neutropenia and severe fatigue, respectively. The MTD was thus established at the 15 mg/day 21 days out of 28. 7/17 (41%) patients completed one year of single agent lenalidomide at 15mg day 21/28. Single agent lenalidomide in WM provided an overall response (minimal response (MR) and better) on an intent-to-treat basis at 15mg/day of 36%, and an extra 2 patients had a prolonged stable disease (SD). A flare effect (transient initial increase of the M spike) was observed in 5 patients. With a median follow-up of 36 months, 14 have progressed with a median time to progression of 16 months (95%CI 5.5-26), with 35% of patients with a PFS greater than 24 months. One patient died with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 91%. The most common adverse event (AE ≥ 10%) was fatigue of at least grade 2, reported in 50% of the patients. The incidence rate of grade 3 and greater hematological AE at 15mg was 14% for anemia, 43% for neutropenia, and no thrombopenia observed. 78% experienced a non hematological AE of at least grade 2, but only 2 patients had a grade 3 AE, nephrotic syndrome and cramps. No second primary malignancy (SPM) nor thromboembolic event were reported to date. Only 21% of patients had dose reduction with a median time of 7 months, and 35% had study drug interruption related to an AE with a median time of 4 months. Conclusion. The MTD of lenalidomide is 15mg/day given on days 21/28 in relapse and refractory WM. Lenalidomide is active in the treatment of RRWM and the safety profile appeared manageable, essentially of grade 2 AEs. Future studies may look into combinations to lenalidomide and continuous therapeutic effect in WM at the determined MTD. Disclosures Leleu: Janssen, Celgene, leopharma, Takeda, Amgen, Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Tournilhac:mundipharma: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding. Leblond:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Comparison of Steady-State Imatinib (IM) Trough Levels, Clinical Response, and Safety Between Caucasian and Asian Patients with Chronic Lyeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Treated with 400mg and 800mg Daily Doses of IM in the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Optimization and Selectivity (TOPS) Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.1127.1127 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 1127-1127

Author(s):

Dong-Wook Kim ◽

Camille Granvil ◽

Eren Demirhan ◽

John Reynolds ◽

Yu Jin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Event ◽

Steady State ◽

Clinical Response ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Average Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Trough Levels

Abstract Abstract 1127 Poster Board I-149 Background In the TOPS study, IM trough levels (Cmin) were collected from different race groups, mainly Caucasian and Asian, but also Black and others. Inter-ethnic differences in the PK of a drug are known to be important factors accounting for inter-individual variation in drug responsiveness. This analysis reports the comparison between Caucasian and Asian CML patients (pts) treated at doses of 400 mg QD and 400 mg bid (800 mg daily) of IM Cmin on Day 29 of initial treatment, clinical response, safety and tolerability. Methods Steady state IM Cmin on Day 29 and clinical response and safety data obtained during the first 12 months (mos) of treatment were obtained from pts randomized 2:1 to 800 mg or 400 mg daily IM. The steady-state Cmin was defined as predose concentration collected approximately within ±3 hours of the scheduled dosing time on Day 29. The associations of race with the rates of major molecular response (MMR) and complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) were evaluated. Correlation of IM exposure with clinical response (MMR and CCyR) was assessed by grouping pts into quartiles based on their measured IM Cmin levels at Day 29. The safety endpoint for each pt was the presence or absence of an adverse event (AE) of grade 3 or higher in the first 12 mos from the first dose. Results IM Cmin levels were available from 229 pts in TOPS including 54 Caucasians, 18 Asians, and 14 Black and others at 400 mg (total 86) and 103 Caucasians, 29 Asians, and 11 Black and others at 800 mg (total 143). For the first 12 mos, the means of the average dose intensities for Asian (mean [range], 362 [267-400] in 400 mg and 666 [226-800] in 800 mg) were not significantly different from Caucasian (386 [204-597] in 400 mg and 666 [289-800] in 800 mg) (P=0.070 and P=0.995 for the 400 mg and 800 mg arms, respectively). Mean (± SD) of IM Cmin levels (ng/mL) with respect to race are shown in Table 1. IM Cmin was slightly over-proportional to dose and showed large interpatient variability (CV=42-60%) for both dose groups regardless of the race group. In the lower quartile Cmin group (Cmin<1290 ng/mL), the differences in CCyR and MMR rates between Asian and Caucasian pts were significant (P=0.031 and P=0.022 respectively), which was probably due to a higher rate of dose interruptions in the 1st 12 mos in Asian pts. A definitive conclusion cannot be drawn due to the small number of Asian pts. Occurrences of at least one grade 3 or 4 adverse event were found to be significantly higher in Asian pts (69% and 75% in the 1st 6 and 12 mos respectively) compared to Caucasian pts (53% and 57% in the 1st 6 and 12 mos respectively) (P=0.028 and P=0.008 respectively). Conclusion The results of this analysis from TOPS show that IM Cmin levels were similar between Caucasian and Asian CML pts in each treatment arm. There were no major differences in efficacy, as measured by MMR and CCyR rates by 12 mos, between Asian and Caucasian pts. There were no unexpected differences in patterns of AEs between Caucasian and Asian pts; however, occurrences of one or more grade 3 AEs were higher in Asian. Further analysis on a larger group of CML pts will be needed to evaluate the impact of AE rate differences between Caucasian and Asian pts. Disclosures Kim: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Granvil:Novartis: Employment. Demirhan:Novartis: Employment. Reynolds:Novartis: Employment. Jin:Novartis: Employment. Wang:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Baccarani:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Mayer Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cortes-Franco:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Wyeth: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Druker:OHSU patent #843 - Mutate ABL Kinase Domains: Patents & Royalties; MolecularMD: Equity Ownership; Roche: Consultancy; Cylene Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Calistoga Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Avalon Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ambit Biosciences: Consultancy; Millipore via Dana-Farber Cancer Institute: Patents & Royalties; Novartis, ARIAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Hughes:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Advisor, Honoraria, Research Funding. Guilhot:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Retreatment with Bortezomib in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Interim Results From RETRIEVE, a Prospective International Phase 2 Study.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3866.3866 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3866-3866 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽

Igor W. Blau ◽

Paolo Corradini ◽

Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽

Johannes Drach ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Bortezomib Treatment ◽

Best Response ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3866 Poster Board III-802 Bortezomib (Velcade®) retreatment has been shown to be active and well tolerated in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) in a number of retrospective studies and a small prospective phase 4 study (EVEREST). This large, prospective, international, multi-center, open-label phase 2 study was conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety of retreatment with bortezomib in MM patients who had previously responded (at least partial response [PR]) to bortezomib-based therapy as their most recent prior treatment. Patients had to have previously tolerated bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2 alone or in combination and have had a treatment-free interval (TFI; time from last dose of initial bortezomib treatment to first dose of bortezomib retreatment) of ≥6 months. Additional eligibility criteria included progressive disease or relapse from complete response (CR) by EBMT criteria, no MM therapy (except maintenance with dexamethasone, thalidomide, or interferon) since the last dose of initial bortezomib treatment, KPS ≥60, and adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function; patients with grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy or neuropathic pain (as defined by NCI CTCAE v3.0) were excluded. Patients received bortezomib at the last tolerated dose (1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2) during initial treatment on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for up to eight 21-day cycles, either alone or in combination with dexamethasone at the investigator's discretion. Response was assessed by EBMT criteria every 6 weeks during treatment and then every 2 months until disease progression. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCI CTCAE v3.0. A total of 130 patients received at least 1 dose of bortezomib retreatment and were included in the safety population. Patients had a median age of 67 years, 57% were male, and 16% had KPS '70%. Median time from diagnosis of MM was 4.5 years (range 0–14 years); median number of prior therapies was 2; 15, 80, 23, and 12 patients had received 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 prior lines of therapy (excluding initial bortezomib therapy). Best response by EBMT criteria to initial bortezomib treatment was CR in 26% and PR in 74% of patients; median time to progression and TFI after initial bortezomib treatment were 17.9 months and 14.3 months, respectively. Last tolerated dose of previous bortezomib therapy was 1.3 mg/m2 and 1.0 mg/m2 for 62% and 29% of patients, respectively; 9% received another dose. Patients received a median 7.0 (range 1–8) cycles of bortezomib retreatment (23% of patients completed all 8 cycles); 72% of patients received concomitant dexamethasone. A total of 126 patients were evaluable for response. In the 126 response-evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR; CR+PR) by best confirmed response (EBMT criteria) was 40%; in addition, 18% of patients achieved minimal response (MR), to give a CR+PR+MR rate of 58%. After a planned secondary efficacy analysis, the ORR (CR+PR) by single best response was 55% (75% ≥MR). Median time to best confirmed response (≥MR) was 2.9 months; time to first response was 1.5 months. Analysis of ORR by patient subgroups showed comparable results in patients who did versus did not receive concomitant dexamethasone (42% vs 32%), in those who received ≤1.0 mg/m2 vs 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib (35% vs 41%), and in those aged ≤65 years vs >65 years (45% vs 36%). ORR was 67%, 39%, 33%, and 25% in patients who had received 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 prior lines of therapy (excluding initial bortezomib), respectively. Analysis of best confirmed responses according to response to initial bortezomib showed that 63% and 52% of patients who achieved a CR or PR, respectively, to initial bortezomib treatment responded to retreatment. Most (98%) patients experienced a treatment-emergent AE; 60% experienced a grade 3/4 AE, and 32% experienced a serious AE; there were 8 deaths, 2 of which (due to sepsis and stroke) were possibly treatment-related. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (35%), neutropenia (7%), diarrhea (7%), and pneumonia (5%). AEs leading to dose reductions or discontinuations were reported for 22% and 12% of patients, respectively. The incidence of neuropathy was 39%, including 9% grade 3; 4% of patients discontinued treatment due to PN; 61% of neuropathy events resolved or improved within a median 1.3 months. These results confirm that bortezomib retreatment is a well-tolerated, feasible, and active therapeutic option for heavily pretreated MM patients without evidence of cumulative toxicity. Disclosures: Petrucci: Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Drach:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Blade:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Johnson and Johnson: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1/2 Multi-Center, Randomized, Open Label Dose Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose, Safety, and Efficacy of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received Prior Treatment That Includes Lenalidomide and Bortezomib.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.301.301 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 301-301 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Paul Richardson ◽

David Siegel ◽

Rachid Baz ◽

Susan L. Kelley ◽

Nikhil C. Munshi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Dose Escalation Study ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Heavily Pretreated ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Dependent Increase

Abstract Abstract 301 Background: Pomalidomide (POM) is an IMiD® derived from thalidomide with a modified chemical structure with improved potency in vitro and potential efficacy and safety benefits in vivo. Two phase (Ph) 1b, single-center, ascending dose, open-label studies in pts with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM; Schey et al, 2004, Streetly et al, 2008) identified maximum tolerated dose (MTD) as 2mg QD or 5mg on alternate days (28 of each 28-day cycle). High response rates of POM alone in heavily pretreated pts were encouraging. To evaluate the MTD, safety and efficacy of POM alone or with Dexamathasone (dex) on a 21/28 day schedule, a Ph 1/2, multicenter, randomized, open-label, 3×3 dose-escalation study was initiated in pts with relapsed/refractory MM after at least 2 prior regimens, including bortezomib and lenalidomide. Methods: The study has a Ph 1 POM MTD (n=32) portion, followed by Ph 2 open-label randomized POM+ dex vs POM alone (192 pts planned). Eligible pts had documented relapsed/refractory MM. All pts received low-dose prophylactic aspirin QD and monitored for venous thromboembolic events (VTE). In Ph 1, POM was given QD on Days 1–21 of 28-day cycle: 4 dose levels of POM (2, 3, 4, 5mg) were studied with option to add dex at 40 mg/wk after 4 cycles for lack of response or progressive disease (PD). Pts enrolled in Ph 1 and discontinued either for intolerance or PD could not be enrolled in Ph 2. Toxicities and responses were assessed using CTCAE v3 and modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria. Results: Results from Ph 1 of the study are reported with 32 pts enrolled to date. Fifteen pts discontinued therapy and 17 pts are ongoing for both safety and efficacy analyses. Mean age is 66.6 yrs (range 38–84), with median number of prior regimens 7 (range 2–18). MTD has not yet been reached. There were 4 dose reductions due to POM (5mg [2-neutropenia, 1-rash]; 3mg [1-neutropenia]) after 108 completed cycles. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common grade 3/4 toxicities, with no dose-dependent increase apparent so far: 12 serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 10 pts; drug related events included POM (VTE, syncope, 3rd degree AV block, asthenia, diarrhea, neutropenia, anemia, rash); dex (lung infection with neutropenia); POM + dex (sepsis with pharyngeal abscess). AEs such as somnolence (1) VTE (1) neuropathy (2), and constipation (4) were uncommon. There were 3 deaths on study not attributed to POM; 2 pts died of rapid PD, 1 pt died of gastrointestinal perforation due to amyloidosis. Responses were seen at each dose level (Table 1). In 20/21 (95%) evaluable pts, clinical activity (SD or better) was reported. During treatment with POM alone, overall response rate (ORR; 1 CR, 2 PR, 5 MR) was 38% (8/21), mean duration of response (DOR) was 11.1 (range 4–32) wks, mean time to progression (TTP) was 8.3 (range 2–36) wks. Median completed cycles of POM +/− dex overall was 4 (range 1–12), with 13/21 evaluable pts (62%) having dex added to their regimens at various different cycles (median cycle 3, range 2–9) for PD or lack of response. During treatment with POM+dex, ORR (2 PR, 3 MR) was 38%, mean DOR of 14.2 (range 4–32) wks, and mean TTP of 20 (range 4–52) wks. In addition, there were 9 stable diseases (SD) on POM alone with mean DOR of 7.1 (range 4–16) wks, and 6 SD on POM + dex with mean DOR of 10.7 (range 8–16) wks. In 5/13 pts (38%), responses improved after dex was added (2 PR, 2 MR, 1 SD). Conclusions: These preliminary results indicate that POM alone or in combination with dex is associated with 38% MR or better, while SD was achieved in 43% (POM alone) and 46% (POM + dex), amongst heavily pretreated pts with relapsed/refractory MM. The incidence of SAEs and discontinuations decreased with increased dose of POM with no dose-dependent increase in grade 3/4 hematological toxicities. The MTD has not been reached to date. Overall, these data indicate that POM has an acceptable safety profile and is a clinically active therapeutic option for advanced refractory MM, warranting further investigation in this patient population. Disclosures: Richardson: Gentium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Keryx Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Johnson and Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Pomalidomide is an anti-proliferative and immunomodulatory agent that is in clinical development for relapsed/refractory MM. Siegel:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Baz:Celgene: Research Funding. Munshi:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Sullivan:Merck: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Doss:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Larkins:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jacques:Celgene: Employment. Donaldson:Celgene: Employment. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

An Open-Label Phase 2 Study Of Ofatumumab In Combination With a Novel AKT Inhibitor (Afuresertib) In Previously Treated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.4175.4175 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 4175-4175

Author(s):

Christine I. Chen ◽

Susi Snitzler ◽

Trina Wang ◽

Harminder Paul ◽

Lisa W Le ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Treatment Phase ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Akt Inhibitor ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Study ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Ofatumumab is a novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody which led to impressive single-agent responses of 47-58% in a phase 2 study of CLL patients (pts) with refractory disease (Wierda et al 2010). Unfortunately, response durations were short (median 5.6-7.1 mos). In order to improve upon these results, we combined ofatumumab with a novel pan-AKT kinase inhibitor, afuresertib (GSK2110183). The AKT pathway plays a centralized role in tumor differentiation, migration, proliferation and survival and is frequently aberrantly activated in CLL (Longo et al 2007). Single agent afuresertib is very well-tolerated with minimal myelotoxicity in relapsed/refractory hematologic malignancies (Spencer et al ASH 2011). We present an interim analysis of the initial 19 of 31 planned pts in an ongoing trial of ofatumumab and afuresertib in relapsed/refractory CLL. Methods Previously treated CLL pts who have received at least one prior fludarabine-containing regimen with disease progression are eligible. During the initial 6 month Treatment Phase, ofatumumab 2000mg IV is administered weekly for 8 doses, then once every 4 week cycle for 4 doses (dose/schedule identical to the pivotal phase 2 trial) with afuresertib 125mg orally daily. An initial 10 day Lead-in Phase with afuresertib alone allows for evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD) changes in phosphoproteins and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. Pts are assessed for safety and response on day 1 of each cycle. Pts achieving SD, PR or CR by the end of the Treatment Phase proceed to the Maintenance Phase with single-agent afuresertib for a maximum of 12 mos (12 cycles). Results Demographics: To date, 19 pts have been enrolled. Median age is 65 yrs (range 43-76), baseline median Hb 108g/L (range 80-145), absolute lymphocytes 29.7 x109/L (range 1.0-464.9), β2M 4.42mg/L (range 1.42-3.21), bulky nodes ≥5cm in 5 pts (32%), organomegaly in 8 pts (42%), del17p/del11q on FISH in 9 pts (47%), and ZAP70+ in 13 pts (68%). Eight pts (42%) were fludarabine-refractory; only 2 pts had received prior alemtuzumab. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-6). Toxicity: Hematologic: 4 pts (21%) developed Gr 3-4 neutropenia during at least 1 cycle; 1 pt (5%) had a febrile neutropenia event. Only 2 pts (10.5%) have developed Gr 3-4 thrombocytopenia, without bleeding. Nonhematologic toxicity: Most common related grade 3-4 toxicities were GI: dyspepsia (53%), diarrhea (37%), nausea (21%), temporally related to oral afuresertib and easily managed symptomatically. Infusion reactions to ofatumumab were frequent (12 pts; 63%) with grade 3 reactions in 3 pts. Five pts (26%) developed non-infectious pneumonitis, with 3 pts requiring hospitalization. Two pts with preexisting atrial arrhythmias sustained exacerbation with weekly ofatumumab infusions. Most infections were mild, with only 1 grade 3 cellulitis. Efficacy: Of the 19 response-evaluable pts receiving a median of 6 cycles (range 1-9), 8 pts (42%) have achieved a PR, 11 SD (58%), and no CR. Response onset was rapid at a median 0.9 mos (range 0.8-2.8). At a median follow-up of 6.8 mos (range 0.3-12.9 mos), 5 pts (26%) have progressed and one patient has died after cycle 1 on therapy due to progressive CLL. PD Studies: CD19+ cells are assayed for phosphorylated AKT and its downstream targets RAS40 and GSK3 in addition to phospho-proteins of alternative pathways including ERK and pS6 by multiplexed phospho-flow cytometry. Peripheral blood samples are collected at screening and on cycle 1 day 10, after dosing with afuresertib. Of the 7 patients evaluated thus far, 5 demonstrated constitutive AKT phosphorylation at baseline. Partial inhibition of AKT signaling evidenced by increased phosphorylation of AKT and inhibition of GSK3 and/or RAS40 phosphorylation in response to BCR stimulation was observed post-treatment, indicating target engagement by afuresertib. PK Studies: Afuresertib exposure (Cmax and AUC) was similar when afuresertib was administered alone or in combination with ofatumumab. Conclusion Preliminary results from this phase 2 study suggests that a combination of ofatumumab plus a novel oral AKT inhibitor, afuresertib, has activity in previously treated CLL and is generally well-tolerated with minimal myelotoxicity. Response data are encouraging but whether durable responses can be achieved requires more mature follow-up. Disclosures: Chen: Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Off-label use of ofatumumab and afuresertib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory CLL. Smith:GSK: Employment, Equity Ownership. Johnston:Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase 2 Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.31.31 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 31-31 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Ravi Vij ◽

Carol Ann Huff ◽

William I. Bensinger ◽

David S. Siegel ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Event ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Single Agent ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease in need of new therapies with unique targets. Ibrutinib is a first-in-class, once-daily, oral, covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), an essential enzyme in the B-cell receptor signaling pathway. While BTK is essential for the development and function of B cells and is down-regulated in plasma cells, the expression of BTK in malignant plasma cells is increased 4-fold and comparable to BTK expression levels in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In addition, pre-clinical models show that BTK inhibition with ibrutinib led to direct inhibition of both osteoclast bone resorption and the release of osteoclast-derived tumor growth factors (Tai et al, Blood 2012). Taken together these data suggest that ibrutinib may have a role in the treatment of MM. Methods: This open label phase 2 dose escalation study was designed to enroll patients in 4 cohorts (Figure) to evaluate efficacy (≥MR) and secondary endpoints of safety, PK, ORR and DOR. Patients must have had documented non-responsive/progressive disease at the time of study entry following at least 2 prior lines of therapy including at least one immunomodulatory agent. Efficacy and safety were assessed at 4 weeks intervals using the IMWG response criteria for efficacy assessments (Rajkumar et al, Blood 2011), while safety was assessed according to CTCAE v4.0 criteria. Results: As of 15 May 2014 and a median follow up of 15.2 months, 69 patients with a median age of 64 years (range 43-81) were dosed, of which 20% had either a del 17p or p53 deletion. The number of median prior therapies was 4 (range, 2-14), 41% had ≥ 5 prior therapies and 80% had undergone autologous stem cell transplant. Sixty-two percent of patients were refractory to their last line of therapy and of the 65 patients that had received prior therapy with both an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor, 44% were refractory to both. Anti-tumor activity was noted across all cohorts. The highest activity with a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 25% including 1 PR, 4 MR and 5 sustained (>4 cycles) SD was observed in Cohort 4. (Table) This led to expansion of Cohort 4 per protocol design. In Cohorts 1 and 3, 14 patients had dex added following PD, resulting in 1 PR and 9 SD. Overall, 57% experienced a Grade 3 or higher adverse event. The most commonly reported non-hematologic toxicities (any grade) were diarrhea (51%), fatigue (41%), nausea (35%), dizziness (25%), and muscle spasms (23%). The majority were Grade 1 and 2. Myelosuppression had a reported overall incidence of any grade anemia (29%), thrombocytopenia (23%), and neutropenia (7%) with 16%, 9% and 4% being Grade 3, respectively. There were no clinically meaningful differences among dose levels. Twenty-three patients experienced a SAE for a total of 47 reported events with 16 assessed as possibly/definitely related to ibrutinib per investigator. At least one dose modification occurred in 22% of patients, with 6 discontinuing due to an adverse event. At the time of the data cut-off 7 patients remain on study treatment. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was PD in 47% of patients, with additional patients discontinuing due to investigator discretion (18%), patient decision (7%) and non-compliance (3%). Conclusions: In this heavily pre-treated patient population ibrutinib, as a single agent and in combination with dex, demonstrated evidence of anti-tumor activity. There was a trend toward improved efficacy (≥MR) in Cohort 4 and treatment was well tolerated with manageable toxicities. Ongoing correlative studies are being conducted to determine changes in cytokines, chemokines and indices of bone metabolism and to determine the effect of dex, a known CYP3A4/5 inducer, on the pharmacokinetic profile of ibrutinib. In addition, ibrutinib is currently being evaluated in combination with carfilzomib in an ongoing Phase1/2b study. (NCT01962792) Figure 1 Figure 1. Table Confirmed Response by Assigned Treatment Cohort Response, n (%) 1 (n=13) 2 (n=18) 3 (n=18) 4 (n=20) PR 1 1 - 1 MR 1 - - 4 SD ≥ 4 cycles 2 4 6 5 SD < 4 cycles 5 6 4 1 PD 4 5 7 5 Not evaluable - 2 1 4 Not evaluable – no post-baseline assessments Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Off Label Use: Discussion of efficacy and safety data with ibrutinib as single-agent and in combination with dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated in a phase 2 clinical trial. Huff:Celgene, Millenium: Consultancy. Bensinger:Pharmacyclics, Novartis, Celgene, Millenium, Sanofi, Acetylon: Consultancy, Research Funding. Siegel:Celgene, Millennium, Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Celgene, BMS, Jansen, Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria. Lebovic:Onyx, Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Anderson:Celgene, Millenium, Onyx, : Speakers Bureau. Elias:Pharmacyclics, Inc.: Employment. Clow:Pharmacyclics, Inc.: Employment. Fardis:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Graef:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Bilotti:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Richardson:Celgene, Millennium, Johnson&Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Phase IIa Study of Single-Agent MOR208 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1528.1528 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1528-1528 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Wojciech Jurczak ◽

Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽

Gianluca Gaidano ◽

Andre Goy ◽

Mariano Provencio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Single Agent ◽

Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Cd20 Antibody ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: There remains a high unmet medical need for new therapies for patients with relapsed or refractory (R-R) B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). CD19 is a B-lymphocyte, lineage-specific surface antigen that is highly expressed by most B-cell NHLs. CD19 expression is maintained on lymphoma cells which have CD20 expression downregulated following treatment with the CD20 antibody, rituximab. Consequently, MOR208 (XmAb5574; MOR00208), an Fc-engineered, humanized, monoclonal antibody that targets CD19, may have clinical utility as a new therapeutic approach to R-R NHL. A phase I study showed MOR208 to be safe and well-tolerated with encouraging single-agent activity in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); an intravenous dose of 12 mg/kg was recommended for phase II studies. Methods: This is a non-randomized, open-label, multicenter, two-stage, phase IIa study of MOR208 in adult patients with R-R NHL whose disease had progressed after at least one prior therapy containing the CD20 antibody, rituximab. In stage 1, 10 patients were to be enrolled into each of four NHL subtype-specific cohorts: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), other indolent NHL (iNHL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Patients were to receive single-agent MOR208, 12 mg/kg intravenously, weekly, for 8 weeks (2 cycles). Those with at least stable disease by the 2007 International Response Criteria could continue MOR208 treatment for an additional 4 weeks (total of 12 weeks of therapy). Patients with a complete or partial response (CR or PR) after 12 weeks could then receive MOR208 as maintenance therapy, every 2 or 4 weeks depending on the investigator's decision, until progression. In stage 2, cohorts with ≥2 responses (CR or PR) were to be expanded by at least 20 additional patients. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints included duration of response, safety, immunogenicity of MOR208, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Results: The DLBCL and FL cohorts were expanded (to N=35 and N=34 patients, respectively), leading to a total enrollment of 92 patients: 56 (61%) were male; median age was 66.5 (range 35-90) years; 80 (87%) had stage III-IV disease; 41 (45%) had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy and 10 (11%) had received a prior stem-cell transplant. The investigator-assessed ORR across all NHL subtypes was 23% (21/92 patients; 16 not evaluable at cutoff) with clinical activity seen in the DLBCL (26% [9/35]; 2 CR, 7 PR); FL (26% [9/34]; 3 CR, 6 PR) and iNHL (27% [3/11]; 2 CR, 1 PR) cohorts (MCL, 0/12 responses). The iNHL cohort was not expanded as the response pattern in this subgroup was heterogeneous according to lymphoma subtype. The longest durations of response recorded to date are 15.4 months for FL and 14.2 months for DLBCL (both ongoing). Grade ≥3 non-hematologic and hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded in 24 (26%) and 14 (15%) of 92 patients, respectively. The most commonly reported grade ≥3 hematologic TEAEs were neutropenia (7 [8%] of 92 patients, anemia (4 [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (4 [4%]); such TEAEs were seen most frequently in the DLBCL cohort (10 [29%] of 35 patients overall; neutropenia, 5 [14%], anemia, 4 [11%], thrombocytopenia, 2 [6%]). Dyspnea was the most commonly reported grade ≥3 non-hematologic TEAE (4 [4%] of 92 patients). Infusion-related reactions were seen in 9 (10%) of 92 patients; all were grade 1-2, except for one case of dyspnea, grade 4. There were no treatment-related deaths. Clinical activity in patients with R-R DLBCL appeared to be dependent on attaining a defined cumulative exposure (AUC0-t) over 8 weeks of around 11,000 day*µg/mL; i.e., at the data cutoff date, all 8 patients with a PR after 2 cycles showed an exposure above this potential threshold level. Conclusions: MOR208 demonstrated encouraging single-agent activity with CRs observed in patients with R-R DLBCL, FL, and iNHL. MOR208 was well tolerated without significant infusional toxicity. These data support further development of MOR208 in combination with other agents (including lenalidomide and bendamustine), and protocols for studies in patients with R-R DLBCL are now being developed. Disclosures Jurczak: CELLTRION, Inc,: Research Funding. Zinzani:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; J&J: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gaidano:Celgene: Research Funding; MorphoSys; Roche; Novartis; GlaxoSmithKline; Amgen; Janssen; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Other: Advisory boards. Goy:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Allos, Biogen Idec, Celgene, Genentech, and Millennium. Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Robak:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys AG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Maddocks:Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Buske:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy. Korolkiewicz:MorphoSys AG: Employment. Striebel:MorphoSys AG: Employment. Blum:Morphosys: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Five-Year Experience with Single-Agent Ibrutinib in Patients with Previously Untreated and Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.233.233 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 233-233 ◽

Cited By ~ 53

Author(s):

Susan M. O'Brien ◽

Richard R. Furman ◽

Steven E. Coutre ◽

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Jan Burger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Over Time

Abstract Background: Ibrutinib (ibr), a first-in-class, once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved by the US FDA for treatment of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) including pts with del17p. The phase 1b/2 PCYC-1102 trial showed single-agent efficacy and tolerability in treatment-naïve (TN; O'Brien, Lancet Oncol 2014) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL (Byrd, N Engl J Med 2013). We report efficacy and safety results of the longest follow-up to date for ibr-treated pts. Methods: Pts received 420 or 840 mg ibr QD until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Overall response rate (ORR) including partial response (PR) with lymphocytosis (PR-L) was assessed using updated iwCLL criteria. Responses were assessed by risk groups: unmutated IGVH, complex karyotype (CK; ≥3 unrelated chromosomal abnormalities by stimulated cytogenetics assessed by a reference lab), and in hierarchical order for del17p, then del11q. In the long-term extension study PCYC-1103, grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs requiring dose reduction or discontinuation were collected. Results: Median age of the 132 pts with CLL/SLL (31 TN, 101 R/R) was 68 y (range, 37-84) with 43% ≥70 y. Baseline CK was observed in 41/112 (37%) of pts. Among R/R pts, 34 (34%) had del17p, 35 (35%) del11q, and 79 (78%) unmutated IGVH. R/R pts had a median of 4 prior therapies (range, 1-12). Median time on study was 46 m (range, 0-67) for all-treated pts, 60 m (range, 0-67.4) for TN pts, and 39 m (range, 0-67) for R/R pts. The ORR (per investigator) was 86% (complete response [CR], 14%) for all-treated pts (TN: 84% [CR, 29%], R/R: 86% [CR, 10%]). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) for TN and 52 m for R/R pts with 60 m estimated PFS rates of 92% and 43%, respectively (Figure 1). In R/R pts, median PFS was 55 m (95% confidence intervals [CI], 31-not estimable [NE]) for pts with del11q, 26 m (95% CI,18-37) for pts with del17p, and NR (95% CI, 40-NE) for pts without del17p, del11q, trisomy 12, or del13q. Median PFS was 33 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and NR for pts with and without CK, and 43 m (95% CI, 32-NE) and 63 m (95% CI, 7-NE) for pts with unmutated and mutated IGVH, respectively(Figure 2). Among R/R pts, median PFS was 63 m (95% CI, 37-NE) for pts with 1-2 prior regimens (n=27, 3 pts with 1 prior therapy) and 59 m (95% CI, 22-NE) and 39 m (95% CI, 26-NE) for pts with 3 and ≥4 prior regimens, respectively. Median duration of response was NR for TN pts and 45 m for R/R pts. Pts estimated to be alive at 60 m were: TN, 92%; all R/R, 57%; R/R del17p, 32%; R/R del 11q, 61%; R/R unmutated IGVH, 55%. Among all treated pts, onset of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs was highest in the first year and decreased during subsequent years. With about 5 years of follow-up, the most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were hypertension (26%), pneumonia (22%), neutropenia (17%), and atrial fibrillation (9%). Study treatment was discontinued due to AEs in 27 pts (20%) and disease progression in 34 pts (26%). Of all treated pts, 38% remain on ibr treatment on study including 65% of TN pts and 30% of R/R pts. Conclusions: Single-agent ibrutinib continues to show durable responses in pts with TN or R/R CLL/SLL including those with del17p, del11q, or unmutated IGVH. With extended treatment, CRs were observed in 29% of TN and 10% of R/R pts, having evolved over time. Ibrutinib provided better PFS outcomes if administered earlier in therapy than in the third-line or beyond. Those without CK experienced more favorable PFS and OS than those with CK. Ibrutinib was well tolerated with the onset of AEs decreasing over time, allowing for extended dosing for 65% of TN and 30% of R/R pts who continue treatment. Disclosures O'Brien: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Furman:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Coutre:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Burger:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Roche: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Sharman:Gilead: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Wierda:Abbvie: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Jones:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Luan:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. James:AbbVie: Equity Ownership; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment. Chu:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Employment; AbbVie: Equity Ownership.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Combined Ruxolitinib and Thalidomide in Patients with Myelofibrosis: Initial Results of a Phase II Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-114125 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 354-354 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Raajit K. Rampal ◽

Srdan Verstovsek ◽

Sean M Devlin ◽

Eytan M. Stein ◽

Tapan M. Kadia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Platelet Count ◽

Combination Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Platelet Response ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Among the most frequent and challenging hematologic manifestations of myelofibrosis (MF) are anemia and thrombocytopenia, the presence of which portends an adverse outcome. Few effective modalities to address these cytopenias exist, particularly thrombocytopenia. Further, although the FDA-approved JAK1/2 inhibitor Ruxolitinib (RUX) has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in MF patients, RUX frequently results in anemia and thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia in particular often results in dose attenuation of RUX. Thalidomide (THAL) is a first-in-class immunomodulatory agent. Studies of THAL in MF patients, alone and with prednisone, have demonstrated improvements in anemia and thrombocytopenia. We therefore sought to examine whether combination of RUX and THAL could result in improvement in both disease-related and therapy-related cytopenias, as well as improve overall disease response in patients with MF. Here we report initial analysis of this study (NCT03069326). Methods: We conducted a multicenter two stage phase II trial designed to assess the effect of RUX and THAL combination in subjects with primary, post-polycythemia vera, or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis. Patients taking RUX at the time of enrollment must have had less than PR per IWG-MRT/ELN 2013 criteria, or be refractory, to RUX single-agent therapy. Patients must have been taking RUX for a minimum of 3 months, and must have been on a stable dose of RUX for a minimum of 4 weeks immediately prior to enrollment. Treatment-naïve patients received single-agent RUX for 3 months (run-in phase) per label, and went on to combination therapy if they achieved less then a PR per IWG-MRT/ELN criteria. Each cycle of therapy was 28 days. Response assessment was evaluated according to the IWG-MRT/ELN 2013 criteria. Platelet response criteria in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia (less than lower limit of normal) included: Major response (≥75% increase in platelet count), Intermediate Response (≥50% increase) and Minor Response (≥25% increase). Adverse events were assessed using the NCI CTCAE v. 4.0. The primary endpoint was the proportion of treated subjects that achieved a response by IWG-MRT criteria and by platelet response criteria. Results: A total of 25 patients are planned to be accrued. At the time of this writing, a total of 18 patients have been accrued. The median age was 70.5 years (47-85). 8 patients had received prior therapies other than RUX, including imetelstat, momelotinib, danazol, pomalidomide, darbepoetin alpha and sotatercept. 7 patients enrolled to the run-in phase. 14 patients received red blood cell transfusions prior to study enrollment. Evaluation of platelet count in patients with baseline thrombocytopenia demonstrated a significant increase in platelet count at cycle 3 of therapy compared to baseline (Figure 1A and B; P<0.05). An increase in Hgb was observed over successive cycles of combination therapy (Figure 1C and D). 5 of 18 accrued patients completed ≥6 cycles of combined therapy at the time of abstract submission and were thus evaluable for response assessment. The overall response rate in these patients was 80% (4/5 patients). Clinical Improvement (Anemia response and Symptom response) occurred in 3 patients (both responses observed in all 3 patients). Major platelet response was observed in 4 of 5 patients with baseline thrombocytopenia. 1 patient met criteria for spleen response (Table 1). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events regardless of attribution included; limb edema, diverticulitis, hypertension, syncope. 1 patient experienced a thromboembolic event. 1 patient experienced a grade 3 hematologic AE (neutropenia). Conclusions: The combination of THAL and RUX has demonstrated a promising efficacy signal in this initial analysis of an ongoing phase II study, and appears to be well tolerated. Platelet count increases were observed in all patients who entered study with baseline thrombocytopenia, a response which appears to be maintained in the majority of patients observed 6 months after starting combination therapy. As well, anemia responses were observed in 3 of 5 evaluable patients. Collectively, these data indicate a potential role for this regimen in patients with anemia and/or thrombocytopenia, who otherwise have limited treatment options. Updated data on duration of response and overall response of all accrued patients will be presented. Disclosures Rampal: Constellation: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Stemline: Research Funding. Verstovsek:Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Stein:Celgene: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Kadia:Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mauro:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Pemmaraju:SagerStrong Foundation: Research Funding; daiichi sankyo: Research Funding; novartis: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; cellectis: Research Funding; samus: Research Funding; Affymetrix: Research Funding; stemline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; plexxikon: Research Funding. Bose:Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Research Funding; Astellas Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer, Inc.: Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Updated Results of a Phase II Randomized Study (ROMULUS) of Polatuzumab Vedotin or Pinatuzumab Vedotin Plus Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4457.4457 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4457-4457 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Franck Morschhauser ◽

Ian Flinn ◽

Ranjana H Advani ◽

Catherine S. Diefenbach ◽

Kathryn Kolibaba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Time ◽

Research Funding ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Advisory Boards ◽

Grade 5 ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Previously reported results from an ongoing study of polatuzumab vedotin (PoV) and pinatuzumab vedotin (PiV), antibody drug conjugates (ADC) containing the anti-mitotic MMAE targeting CD79b (PoV) and CD22 (PiV), showed clinical activity in combination with rituximab (R) in relapsed/refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL). Here we report updated results of ADC + R at the RP2D of 2.4 mg/kg and initial results of PoV + R in r/r FL at the PoV dose of 1.8 mg/kg. Methods: Pts were randomized to receive PoV or PiV + R (ADC 2.4 mg/kg + R 375 mg/m2). In a separate non-randomized cohort (Cohort C), r/r FL pts were treated with PoV (1.8 mg/kg) + R. ADC + R was given every 21 days. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 months. Results: As of 21 February 2014, 59 pts received PoV + R (39 DLBCL; 20 FL), 63 PiV + R (42 DLBCL; 21 FL); 20 r/r FL pts were treated in Cohort C. Median time of follow-up was 10 mo. for PoV + R, 9 mo. for PiV + R, and 5 mo. for Cohort C. Median prior therapies [DLBCL, 3 (1-10); FL, 2 (1-8)] were balanced among the randomized treatment (tx) arms, median prior therapies in Cohort C was 2 (1-13); overall 44% were R refractory. Median tx cycles in DLBCL: 6 PoV (range 1-16) and 7 PiV (1-15); FL: 10 PoV (3-17), 7 PiV (1-14), and 6 Cohort C (2-10). Overall safety profiles of both regimens in the randomized arms receiving 2.4 mg/kg ADC were similar. The most common tx-emergent adverse events (AE) ≥25%: fatigue (55%), diarrhea (43%), nausea (37%), peripheral neuropathy (PN) (39%), neutropenia (27%), constipation (26%), sensory PN (25%), and decreased appetite (25%). Grade ≥ 3 AE >3%: neutropenia (24%), diarrhea (6%), dyspnea (5%), febrile neutropenia (4%), hyperglycemia (4%), fatigue (3%), and thrombocytopenia (3%). Serious AEs were reported in 43% and 36% of PiV and PoV treated pts, respectively. Discontinuation of study treatment for AE was reported in 49% and 41% of PiV and PoV treated pts, respectively. Thirty-five pts discontinued treatment due to PN with a median time to discontinuation of 5.6 mo. PN reversibility was observed following treatment interruptions and ADC dose modifications. Two of 9 Grade 5 AEs (sepsis, urosepsis) were attributed to CD22 ADC; no Grade 5 AEs were attributed to CD79b ADC. In Cohort C the most common tx-emergent AE ≥ 25%: fatigue (55%), nausea (45%), neutropenia (40%), sensory PN (30%), diarrhea (25%), constipation (25%) and pyrexia (25%). Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was reported in 7 pts; no other Grade ≥ 3 AE was reported in >1 pt. Serious AE were reported in 5 pts. Two pts discontinued study treatment for AE. No Grade 5 AEs were reported. Overall response rate (ORR), complete (CR) and partial (PR) response rates, n (%) [95% CI], and median PFS in DLBCL (95% CI) are shown in the table. Median PFS in the FL cohorts are not reported due to insufficient follow-up duration. Table PoV (CD79b) + R PiV (CD22) + R PoV [1.8 mg/kg] + R (Cohort C) R/R DLBCL ORR CR PR mPFS (mo.) N=39 22 (56%) [41, 71] 6 (15%) [7, 30] 16 (41%) [26, 58] 5.4 (2.8-8.4) N=42 24 (57%) [41, 72] 10 (24%) [12, 39] 14 (33%) [20, 48] 5.2 (4.1-NR) N/A R/R FL ORR CR PR N=20 14 (70%) [47, 86] 8 (40%) [21, 64] 6 (30%) [14, 53] N=21 13 (62%) [40, 80] 2 (10%) [2, 30] 11 (52%) [30, 72] N=16 7 (44%) [20, 70] 0 7 (44%) [20, 70] Pharmacokinetic profiles were similar for both ADCs across DLBCL and FL with no free MMAE accumulation. Pts receiving PoV at 1.8 mg/kg had proportionately lower exposure of antibody conjugated MMAE compared to pts treated at the 2.4 mg/kg dose level. Conclusions: PoV and PiV + R were generally well-tolerated with similar toxicity profiles. Neutropenia, PN, and diarrhea were the principal toxicities. Similar efficacy was observed with both ADCs in heavily pretreated pts with DLBCL. The higher CR rate with PoV + R compared to PiV + R suggests greater clinical activity in r/r FL. Lower overall response rates were observed in r/r FL pts treated with a lower dose of PoV. Results based on longer follow-up to further assess differences in safety and tolerability between the two PoV doses in r/r FL will be presented. Additional data of pts who received crossover ADC + R treatment following documented disease progression on initial ADC + R treatment will also be presented. Combination studies of PoV + R with chemotherapy and with ADC schedules to reduce PN are ongoing or in planning. Disclosures Morschhauser: Genentech/roche: Honoraria, travel grants Other; Celgene: advisory boards, advisory boards Other, Honoraria. Off Label Use: obinutuzumab and lenlidomide in relapsed follicular lymphoma. Flinn:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Advani:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Diefenbach:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Press:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Chen:Genentech, inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Salles:Genentech, inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Tilly:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Cheson:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. Assouline:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hagenbeek:millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zinzani:Genentech, inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yalamanchili:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Lu:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Jones:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Jones:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Chu:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Sharman:Gen: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Combination Therapy with Lenalidomide and Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.206.206 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 206-206 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽

Xavier C. Badoux ◽

Susan O'Brien ◽

William G. Wierda ◽

Stefan Faderl ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Single Agent ◽

Infectious Complications ◽

Fish Analysis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Tumor Lysis ◽

Flare Reaction ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 206 Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent that has clinical activity in CLL. In patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory CLL treatment with single agent lenalidomide induces an overall response rate of 32–47% when used as monotherapy (Chanan-Khan A.A. et al. 2006; Ferrajoli A. et al. 2008). Rituximab has modest activity as monotherapy, but significally synergizes with chemotherapy agents when administered to pts with CLL. The addition of rituximab to lenalidomide resulted in clinical responses in a small number of pts with CLL that had progressed while on lenalidomide monotherapy (Chanan-Khan A.A. et al. 2006). Because lenalidomide stimulates NK cell proliferation (Wu et al. 2008) we hypothesized that lenalidomide will enhance the activity of rituximab. We, therefore, designed a phase II study to evaluate the combination of lenalidomide and rituximab in pts with relapsed CLL. Pts with CLL and active disease were eligible if they had received prior treatment with purine analog-based therapy. Standard inclusion criteria were required in terms of organ function and performance status, and pts with any ANC or platelet count were eligible. All pts received rituximab (375 mg/m2) intravenously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of cycle 1, and then once every 4 weeks during cycles 3–12. Lenalidomide was given orally at the dose of 10 mg/day starting on day 9 of cycle 1 and continued daily for 12 cycles. Each cycle consisted of 28 days of treatment. During the first two weeks of therapy, allopurinol at the dose of 300 mg daily was prescribed as prophylaxis for tumor lysis. Sixty pts were accrued between October 2008 and July 2009. Thirty-seven pts have received treatment for at least 6 cycles and are evaluable for response and toxicity. The median age is 59 yrs (range 44–83), 15 pts (41%) have Rai stage III-IV disease and the median beta-2M level was 3.6 mg/dL (1.5–9). The median number of prior treatments was 2 (1–9), 9 pts (24%) were refractory to fludarabine and all pts had received prior rituximab. Twenty-six pts (70%) had unmutated IgVH, 9 pts (24%) had chromosome 17p deletion and 10 pts (37%) had 11q deletion by FISH analysis. After 6 cycles of treatment, 25 pts achieved a response [6 nodular PR (16%), 19 PR (51%)] for an OR of 68% (according to 1996 NCI-WG criteria). Six pts (16%) attained stable disease or clinical improvement and are continuing on treatment, and 6 pts (16%) failed to respond, including one death that occurred on day 34 owing to infectious complications. Responses according to pts characteristics are summarized in the table: Most common grade 3–4 treatment related adverse events observed were: neutropenia (16 pts, 43%), fatigue (6 pts,16%) and thrombocytopenia (4 pts, 11%). One pt (3%) developed grade 3 tumor lysis syndrome and 1 pt (3%) had grade 3 joint pain. Infectious complications occurred in 9 pts (24%): neutropenic fever (6 pts), pneumonia (2 pts) and urosepsis (1 pt). Lenalidomide-associated tumor flare reaction was limited to grade 1 (8 pts, 22%) and grade 2 (1 pt, 3%). We examined the effect of therapy with lenalidomide and rituximab on the distribution of circulating B, T, and NK cell subsets. When compared to the baseline, there were significant decreases in the percentage of CD19+CD20+ B cells along with significant increases in the percentages of CD4+ T, CD8+ T, CD4+CD25hiCD127− regulatory T, and CD3−CD16+CD56+ NK cells after 3 cycles of therapy (paired sample t test). In conclusion, our results suggest that the combination of lenalidomide and rituximab is superior to single agent lenalidomide, despite all our pts having received prior rituximab. Additionally, there was no increase in toxicity and lenalidomide-associate tumor flare reaction was less frequent and less severe with this combination compared to single agent lenalidomide. Disclosures: Ferrajoli: Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of Lenalidomide for the treatment of CLL is considered investigational.. O'Brien:Celgene: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding. Wierda:Genentech: Honoraria; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Keating:Celgene: Data Monitoring Committee, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text