scholarly journals Hematologic and Immunologic Function and Patient Well-Being for the Phase III RESONATETM Study of Ibrutinib Vs Ofatumumab in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4696-4696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline C. Barrientos ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Jennifer R. Brown ◽  
Neil E. Kay ◽  
Nishitha M. Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Introduction: Ibrutinib (Imbruvica®), an oral, first-in-class covalent BTK inhibitor, is a new treatment option approved by FDA for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients (pts) with ≥1 prior therapy. We previously reported results from the phase III trial, in which ibrutinib (ibr) significantly improved progression-free and overall survival vs ofatumumab (ofa) in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) (Byrd et al. NEJM, 2014). Here, we report measures of patient well-being, including hematologic, immunologic, and quality of-life parameters, at interim analysis (IA). Methods: Pts with CLL/SLL after ≥1 prior therapy were randomized 1:1 to ibr 420 mg/day until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or to ofa for up to 24 weeks. At IA, secondary efficacy endpoints of hematologic improvement (sustained improvement ≥56 days without transfusions or growth factors) and FACiT-Fatigue (FACiT-F) outcomes were analyzed, along with exploratory endpoints assessing disease-related symptoms (DRS), serum immunoglobulin, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) by EORTC QLQ-C30, and medical resource utilization (MRU). Results: Of 391 enrolled pts (ibr n=195; ofa n=196), 63% had cytopenia(s) at baseline: 45% had anemia (hemoglobin ≤11 g/dL), 35% thrombocytopenia (platelets ≤100×109/L), and 20% neutropenia (absolute neutrophil counts [ANC] ≤1.5×109/L). On the ibr arm, 69% of pts with baseline cytopenias experienced sustained improvement in blood counts compared to 43% on ofa (P<0.0001, table). There was no decrement in serum immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, IgM) during follow-up. IgA levels increased on the ibrutinib arm only (mean change from baseline: 41% at week 24). Immune cells CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell and NK-cell levels remained relatively stable during treatment. Mean change in FACiT-F score from baseline are shown in the figure for ibr and ofa arms. At week 24, clinically meaningful (≥3 points) improvement in FACiT-F occurred in more pts on ibr than ofa (59% vs 46%, P=0.06); clinically meaningful deterioration was reported by 14% vs 24% (P=0.08), respectively. A larger proportion of ibr vs ofa pts showed clinically meaningful improvement on EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health scores (46% vs 40%). Clinically meaningful improvement (≥10 points) from baseline to week 24 in ibr vs ofa pts was observed for fatigue (median 11 vs 0). A 50% reduction in lymph node based on IRC-assessed CT was observed in 93% (177/190 evaluable) of ibr pts compared with 17% (29/174 evaluable) of ofa pts (P< 0.0001). Splenic response based on IRC-assessed CT was reported for 85% (138/163 evaluable) of ibr pts compared with 54% (82/151 evaluable) of ofa pts. Baseline DRS were comparable between groups; however, improvement by at least 1 grade (G) post-baseline was observed in ibr relative to ofa pts for weight loss (100% vs 93%), fatigue (88% vs 72%), night sweats (95% vs 86%), and anorexia (100% vs 64%), respectively. Cumulative MRU was comparable for growth factors and transfusions, with ibr pts having longer median treatment duration: 8.6 months for ibr vs 5.3 for ofa. Hospitalizations in the first 30 days occurred in 2% ibr vs 15% ofa pts. After adjusting for treatment exposure duration, diarrhea, grade 1-2 bleeding events (e.g petechiae), and atrial fibrillation were among those noted to be more frequent on the ibrutinib arm while events such as fatigue, infusion reaction, and peripheral sensory neuropathy were seen more commonly with ofa. Major hemorrhage events were uncommon, observed in 2 patients on the ibr arm vs 3 on ofa arm without adjusting for exposure time. Exposure-adjusted analysis showed no difference in any-grade infection and a 43% relative reduction for grade 3 or higher infections for ibr. Conclusions: Ibr compared to ofa when administered to previously treated CLL/SLL pts led to improvements in hematologic function and disease burden. A survival benefit with ibr, together with sustained improvements in hematologic endpoints and PRO suggest that ibr enhances quality of life while prolonging survival. Table. Sustained hematologic improvement Parameter, n (%) ITT population Pts with cytopenias at baseline Ibr n=195 Ofa n=196 P value Ibr n=195 Ofa n=196 P value Platelets 60 (31) 19 (10) <0.0001 53/74 (72) 14/64 (22) <0.0001 ANC 52 (27) 19 (10) <0.0001 26/41 (63) 12/38 (32) 0.0047 Hemoglobin 42 (22) 32 (16) 0.1883 42/89 (47) 32/86 (37) 0.1815 Figure. Improvement in FACiT-F by treatment arm. Figure. Improvement in FACiT-F by treatment arm. Disclosures Barrientos: Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Brown:Sanofi, Onyx, Vertex, Novartis, Boehringer, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Emergent, Morphosys, Celgene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Gilead: Consultancy. Kay:Genetech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Coutre:Janssen, Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tam:Pharmacyclics and Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mulligan:Roche, Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Jaeger:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Devereux:Pharmacyclics, Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Robak:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schuh:Roche, Gilead, GSK, NAPP, Celgene: Honoraria. Bloor:GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dearden:Roche, GSK, Gilead, Janssen, Napp: Honoraria. Jones:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kierschniak:Pharmacyclics, GmbH: Employment. Eckert:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Suzuki:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Hsu:Pharmacyclics: Employment. James:Pharmacyclics: Employment. Byrd:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Hillmen:Pharmacyclics, Janssen, Gilead, Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Improved Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of Alemtuzumab (Campath®, MabCampath®) Plus Fludarabine (Fludara®) Versus Fludarabine Alone as Second-Line Treatment of Patients with B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Preliminary Results From a Phase III Randomized Trial.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 537-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Engert ◽  
Liana Gercheva ◽  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Pilipenko Galina ◽  
Jingyang Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Abstract 537 Introduction: Single-arm pilot and Phase II trial data suggested that the combination of fludarabine and alemtuzumab (FluCam) may improve outcome for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). To validate these observations, a Phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of FluCam vs. fludarabine (Flu) alone as second-line therapy for pts with relapsed or refractory CLL. Methods: Patients with Rai Stages I-IV were randomized to FluCam or Flu using the minimization method to ensure a balance between treatment arms by study center, Rai stage, disease status, age, sex, prior Flu therapy, and maximum lymph node (LN) size. FluCam was administered in Phases A and B. Patients received escalating doses of intravenous (IV) alemtuzumab alone (Phase A). Once alemtuzumab 30 mg IV was tolerated, pts received FluCam as Flu 30 mg/m2 IV followed immediately by alemtuzumab 30 mg IV on days 1-3 of a 28 day cycle (Phase B). In the Flu arm, pts received 25 mg/m2IV on days 1-5 of a 28 day cycle. For both arms, all pts could receive up to six cycles depending on response and toxicity. All pts received prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole DS and famciclovir until CD4+ counts were ≥200 cells/μL. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall response (OR), complete response (CR), overall and 3 year survival, and safety. The primary analysis was based on the independent response review panel's (IRRP) assessment of response and date of progression for each patient. Two interim analyses were prospectively planned and conducted by the data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) with the final analysis planned after a total of 190 events. The 2nd interim analysis included 139 PFS events and met the pre-specified criteria; the DSMB recommended early study termination. Results: 335 pts were randomized (FluCam n=168 and Flu n=167); Rai Stage III-IV: 37%; median age: 60 years; prior Flu therapy: 20% and maximum LN size ≥5 cm: 14%. The median treatment cycles received were 6 for both arms. 60% of FluCam and 64% of Flu pts received 6 cycles of treatment. The median IRRP determined PFS for FluCam was significantly prolonged compared to Flu (29.6 months vs. 20.7 months, respectively; p=0.005; HR 1.63 [95% CI: 1.16, 2.28]; Figure 1). Median PFS by Rai Stage was: Stage I-II - 27.4 months for FluCam (n = 105) vs. 21.3 months for Flu (n = 103), p=0.215; Stage III-IV - 26.1 months for FluCam (n = 61) vs. 12.1 months for Flu (n = 62), p=0.003. Per investigator response assessment, FluCam resulted in significantly higher OR and CR rates (OR: FluCam 84.8% vs. Flu 67.9%, p<0.001; and CR: FluCam 30.4% vs. Flu 16.4%, p=0.002). The IRRP assessment of response was not completed for all pts and is not availabel for the 2nd interim analysis. No differences in survival have been observed (FluCam 37 deaths and Flu 41 deaths) with a median follow up of 17 months. Adverse events (AEs) occurring in >10% of the pts included pyrexia, neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, chills, lymphopenia, rash, infusion related reactions, nausea and urticaria in the FluCam arm; and, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia and leukopenia in the Flu arm. Treatment-emergent grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (18% vs. 22%), neutropenia (60% vs. 66%) and anemia (13% vs. 22%) were comparable in FluCam vs. Flu arms. Overall, 33% (n=54) of pts in the FluCam arm experienced a SAE vs. 26% (n=42) in the Flu arm. Reported SAEs for neutropenia were 4.9% in the FluCam arm and 1.8% in the Flu arm; however, febrile neutropenia was similarly reported in the two arms 3.7% vs 3.6% of pts, respectively. Infections including CMV occurred in 47% and 35% of the FluCam and Flu pts, respectively. Symptomatic CMV infection occurred only in the FluCam arm in 8% of pts, of which 1% were SAEs and 0% classified as grade 4 or higher. Deaths occurring on therapy or within 30 days after last dose were 2% on the FluCam arm vs. 5% on the Flu arm. Conclusions: The 2ndinterim analysis indicates that the combination of FluCam is superior to Flu as second-line therapy for pts with relapsed or refractory CLL, including those with advanced disease stage. With significantly longer PFS, higher OR and CR rates, an acceptable safety profile and a convenient administration regimen, FluCam may be an additional second-line treatment option for pts with relapsed or refractory CLL. Disclosures: Engert: Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Alemtuzumab (Campath, MabCampath) is indicated for the treatment of CLL. This trial examined the use of alemtuzumab in combination with fludarabine monophospate.. Gercheva:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Robak:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Galina:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wu:Genzyme Corporation: Employment. Sirard:Genzyme Corporation: Employment. Elter:Genzyme Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Vs. Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients (Pts) with Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma without an Intent for Immediate Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT): Results of the Randomized Phase III Trial SWOG S0777

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 25-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Durie ◽  
Antje Hoering ◽  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Muneer H. Abidi ◽  
Joshua Epstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Lenalidomide with dexamethasone (Rd) is a standard of care for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. SWOG S0777, a randomized phase III trial, has compared Rd with bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd). The primary end point is progression-free survival (PFS) using a pre-specified one-sided stratified log rank test at a significance level of 0.02. The stratification factors are International Staging System (ISS) stage (I, II or III) and intent to transplant (yes or no), a total of 6 strata. Overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety are secondary end points. Methods: This analysis includes 474 patients evaluable for survival endpoints: 232 patients were randomized to Rd and 242 patients to VRd. Rd patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-21 and dexamethasone 40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. VRd patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-14 and dexamethasone 20/mg/day on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV push on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. All patients received aspirin 325 mg/day and VRd patients received HSV prophylaxis per institutional standard. Induction was six 28-day cycles of Rd and eight 21-day cycles of VRd followed by Rd maintenance for all patients until progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Initial analyses utilized the pre-specified one-sided stratified log rank test. Results: Data are presented for VRd followed by Rd throughout. Between 2008 and 2012, 525 patients from 48 institutions were randomized. Fifty-one patients, 29 randomized to Rd and 22 randomized to RVd, were ineligible for the following reasons: missing, insufficient or early or late baseline labs (40); not meeting requirements of measurable disease (6); inadequate marrow function (1); inadequate creatinine clearance (1); prior malignancy (1); prior therapy (1); and more than 2 weeks of prior steroid therapy (1). The pre-specified significance level of 0.02 was reached in the log rank testing. The stratified hazard ratio (HR) was 0.742 (96% Wald confidence interval: 0.579, 0.951), and the one-sided stratified log rank p-value for PFS (VRd vs. Rd) was 0.0066. The OS was improved for VRd vs. Rd with HR = 0.666; two-sided log-rank p-value = 0.0114. The PFS and OS survival charts are displayed below. Median PFS was 43 months (VRd) versus 31 months (Rd). Median OS was not reached (VRd) versus 63 months (Rd). Patient characteristics were well-matched between VRd and Rd with the exception of fewer women (37% vs. 47%: P = 0.033) and fewer older patients (≥ 65 years 38% vs. 48%: P = 0.042) receiving VRd. With univariate Cox regression analysis correlates of better PFS/OS were: use of VRd (HR 0.72/0.65; P = 0.006); hemogoblin ≥10 g/dl (HR 1.17/1.43; P = 0.2/0.026) and lower ISS disease stage (HR 1.35/1.98; P = 0.014/< 0.001). The ORR for VRd was 71.07% versus 63.79% for Rd. The adverse events by CTC category and toxicity category were fairly well balanced. The most common hematologic adverse events (≥ Grade 3 and at least possibly attributable to therapy) were low hemoglobin (RVd=13%; Rd=16%), leukopenia (RVd=14%; Rd=16%), lymphopenia (RVd=23%; Rd=18%), neutropenia (RVd=19%; Rd=21%), and thrombocytopenia (RVd=18%; Rd=14%). The most common non-hematologic adverse events (≥ Grade 3 and at least possibly attributable to therapy) were: fatigue (RVd=16%; Rd=14%), sensory neuropathy (RVd=23%; Rd=3%), hyperglycemia (RVd=7%; Rd=11%), thrombosis/embolism (RVd=8%; Rd=9%), hypokalemia (RVd=9%; Rd=6%), muscle weakness (RVd=7%; Rd=4%), diarrhea (RVd=8%; Rd=2%), and dehydration (RVd=8%; Rd=2%). As expected ≥ Grade 3 neuropathy was more frequent with VRd (24% vs. 5%: P < 0.0001). Sixteen patients experienced a second primary malignancy, 7 (3%) on VRd and 9 (4%) on Rd. Conclusion: The addition of bortezomib to lenalidomide dexamethasone for induction therapy in previously untreated myeloma results in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS as well as better OS. VRd had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile despite increased neurotoxicity and represents a potential new standard of care. Support: NIH/NCI/NCTN grants CA180888, CA180819, CA180821, CA180820; and in part by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., The Takeda Oncology Company, for provision of study drug. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Durie: Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Abidi:Millennium: Research Funding. Epstein:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Reu:Takeda/Millennium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Orlowski:BioTheryX, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding. Barlogie:Dana Farber Cancer Institute: Other: Travel Stipend; International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Other: Travel Stipend; ComtecMed- World Congress on Controversies in Hematology: Other: Travel Stipend; European School of Haematology- International Conference on Multiple Myeloma: Other: Travel Stipend; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Myeloma Health, LLC: Patents & Royalties: Co-inventor of patents and patent applications related to use of GEP in cancer medicine licensed to Myeloma Health, LLC; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Other: Travel Stipend.

scholarly journals Venetoclax Improves Quality of Life for Patients with Elapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4858-4858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Cochrane ◽  
Tatiana Chagorova ◽  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Su-Peng Yeh ◽  
Evgeny Nikitin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
The Impact

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have significantly decreased health related quality of life (HRQoL), particularly related to severe and progressive fatigue. Side effects of chemotherapies and the emotional burden of living with an often poor prognosis disease also negatively impact patient HRQoL. Venetoclax, an oral agent that targets the anti-apoptotic protein BCL2, has demonstrated high rates of deep and durable response in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL, including those with 17p deletions, and has been shown to facilitate clinically relevant improvement in several key aspects of functioning and HRQoL. We evaluated the impact of venetoclax monotherapy on the quality of life of patients with R/R CLL. METHODS: VENICE II is an ongoing open-label, phase 3b, multicenter study (NCT02980731) that assessed patient-reported HRQoL in patients who were ≥18 years old with R/R CLL, including those with 17p deletion, TP53 mutations, and/or prior experience with B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor-containing (BCRi) therapy, treated with venetoclax monotherapy (5-week dose-titration, starting at 20mg once daily, then increased weekly to 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg, followed by 400mg once daily). The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline to Week 48 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) subscale. HRQoL subscales analyzed included: Global Health Status, Role Functioning, Emotional Functioning, Cognitive Functioning, Social Functioning, and Fatigue. The impact on QoL was also assessed on the CLL Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16). Relevance of mean changes in HRQoL measures from baseline were analyzed based on minimum important difference (MID); a 5-10 point change was defined as MID, and >10 points was considered clinically meaningful.(Osoba, D., et al. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:139-44. Osoba, D., et al. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:353-64.) Safety and adverse events (AEs) were also monitored. RESULTS: As of the data cutoff, April 30, 2018, the median time on study was 28 weeks (range: 1 - 73) and the median time on therapy was 23 weeks (range: 0.1 - 69) in this ongoing study. Of the 169 treated patients, 70% were male; the median age was 65 years (range: 24 - 86). Among those with available data, 17p deletions and TP53 mutations were confirmed in 34% (41/122) and 38% (19/50) of patients, respectively. Overall, 38%, 20%, and 42% of patients had one, two, and three (or more) prior lines of therapy respectively; 21% of patients had prior BCRi therapy. Clinically meaningful improvements from baseline were observed by week 12 and were sustained through week 48 in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health status and the role function, social function, and fatigue subscales (Table and Figure 1A) and EORTC-QLQ-CLL16 future health and disease effect subscales (Table and Figure 1B). Eighty-two percent of patients had at least 1 AE; most commonly observed AEs (≥10% of patients) were neutropenia (35%), diarrhea (17%), thrombocytopenia (15%), anemia (12%), nausea (12%), and upper respiratory infection (11%). Twenty-eight percent of patients had a serious AE, of which the most common were pneumonia (5%), febrile neutropenia (4%) and pyrexia (3%). Five percent of patients discontinued the study due to an AE. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data from this ongoing study suggest that patients with R/R CLL experienced improvement in several key aspects of functioning and quality of life with venetoclax monotherapy within the first 12 weeks which is sustained over time. Venetoclax monotherapy was well tolerated in R/R CLL patients. These findings are consistent with previous studies of R/R CLL patients who received venetoclax monotherapy. Disclosures Cochrane: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Calgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Robak:AbbVie, Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy. Yeh:GNT Biotech & Medicals Crop.: Research Funding. Nikitin:AbbVie, Inc: Speakers Bureau. Breuleux:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership; Gilead: Equity Ownership; Basilea: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Patents & Royalties. Masud:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sail:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Komlosi:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Walter and Eliza Hall: Employment, Patents & Royalties; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Associations Between Improvements in Myelofibrosis (MF) Symptoms and Quality of Life Measures with Splenomegaly Reduction in COMFORT-I: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of the JAK1 and JAK2 Inhibitor Ruxolitinib Versus Placebo in Patients with MF,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3842-3842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben A. Mesa ◽  
Jason Gotlib ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
John Catalano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Jak2 Inhibitor ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Abstract 3842 Background: Dysregulated JAK-STAT signaling is a key feature in MF, which is characterized by splenomegaly, debilitating symptoms, poor quality of life (QoL), cytopenias, and shortened survival. Ruxolitinib is a selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor with clinical activity in MF. COMFORT-I is a Phase III, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of ruxolitinib in patients with MF. At wk 24, 41.9% of patients receiving ruxolitinib reached the protocol-defined threshold of a ≥35% reduction in spleen volume (SV) compared to 0.7% in the placebo group (p<0.0001). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the relationship between SV reduction achieved with ruxolitinib treatment and changes in symptoms and QoL. Methods: 309 patients were randomized to receive ruxolitinib (n=155) or placebo (n=154). Initial dosing was based on baseline platelet counts: 15 mg BID for counts of 100–200 x109/L and 20 mg BID for >200 x109/L. SV was measured by blinded imaging (MRI or CT scan) every 12 wks. Via electronic diary, patients reported MF symptoms daily using the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0. The Total Symptom Score (TSS) from the MFSAF represents a combined score for the individual symptoms of abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left side, early satiety, itching, night sweats, and bone/muscle pain. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMISE) Fatigue questionnaires were administered at each visit; Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) was administered at every visit beginning at wk 4. The PGIC rates a patient's overall sense of whether a treatment has been beneficial or not on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse, with 4 = no change. Results: Baseline QoL scores reflected debilitating disease, and were similar to scores for similar-aged patients with other cancers (Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values Manual, July 2008). The impact on patients was particularly evident on the PROMIS Fatigue scale and QLC-C30 Global Health, Physical Functioning, Role Functioning, and Social Functioning subscales. Baseline Symptom and QoL Measures* Associations between changes in symptoms and QoL with the objectively measured changes in SV were evaluated. Patients receiving ruxolitinib were grouped according to SV reduction at 24 wks of treatment: ≥35% reduction in SV (n=65), 10-<35% (n=51), and <10% (n=23). Symptom and QoL responses were evaluated among the various subgroups (of the SV reduction percentage strata) and comparisons were made across these and the total placebo group (n=106). Shown in the Figure are mean changes at wk 24 relative to baseline for TSS, QoL indicators, and PGIC scores. Conclusions: Changes in SV as low as 10% in ruxolitinib-treated patients were associated with improvements on EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health subscale, PROMISE Fatigue scale, and the MFSAF v2.0 diary TSS. Moreover, commensurate improvements in these outcomes were observed as the SV reduction increased. Importantly, the simple PGIC questionnaire allowed patients to characterize a meaningful change in their condition that was consistent with more comprehensive measures of MF symptoms and quality of life, reflecting a doctor-patient assessment easily applied to clinical practice. Disclosures: Mesa: Incyte: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; SBio: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Gotlib:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gupta:Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Catalano:Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Deininger:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Shields:Incyte: Consultancy. Miller:Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Winton:Incyte: Consultancy. Hare:Incyte: Employment. Erickson-Viitanen:Incyte: Employment. Sun:Incyte: Employment. Sandor:Incyte: Employment. Levy:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Verstovsek:Incyte: Research Funding.

Ofatumumab + Chlorambucil Versus Chlorambucil Alone In Patients With Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Results Of The Phase III Study Complement 1 (OMB110911)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 528-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Hillmen ◽  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Ann Janssens ◽  
K Govindbabu ◽  
Sebastian Grosicki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Chemoimmunotherapy with purine analogues and the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab is the standard of care as initial therapy in younger and physically fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, most CLL patients are elderly and/or have comorbidities, meaning that fludarabine-containing regimens are often inappropriate, carry greater toxicity, and treatment of these patients remains challenging. Most randomized studies in previously untreated CLL have been conducted in younger or fit patients and results cannot necessarily be extrapolated to older, less fit patients. While chlorambucil (CHL) remains a standard of care for this patient population, more effective but tolerable treatment choices are still needed. Ofatumumab (O) demonstrated superior preclinical activity, compared to rituximab, against cells with low CD20 density like CLL and showed clinical activity as monotherapy, with high overall response rates (ORR) in patients with refractory CLL. Therefore, the addition of O to CHL could provide superior clinical outcomes than CHL alone, while being tolerable, for patients who are elderly and/or have comorbidities and currently have limited treatment options. Methods Patients with CLL who required therapy (2008 NCI-WG guidelines) and were considered inappropriate for fludarabine-based therapy due to advanced age and/or co-morbidities were randomized (1:1) to receive either O+CHL or CHL. CHL was given orally (10mg/m2 at days 1-7 of each 28 day cycle) and O was administered as intravenous infusions (Cycle 1: 300mg day 1 and 1000mg day 8, subsequent cycles: 1000mg at day 1). O premedication included acetaminophen, antihistamine and glucocorticoid. Treatment duration was a minimum of 3 cycles, until best response up to a maximum of 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) and secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Patients 447 patients from 16 countries were randomized. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms. Median age was 69 years with 82% ≥65 years and/or having ≥2 comorbidities. All modified Rai stages were represented (Low 8%, intermediate 51%, high 40%). 56% of patients had unmutated IgVH, 6% showed 17p deletions and 75% had β-2-microglobulin levels ≥3500μg/L. Results PFS as assessed by an IRC was significantly prolonged in the O+CHL arm (22.4 months) compared to CHL alone (13.1 months, p<0.001). ORR was higher for O+CHL vs CHL (82% vs 69%, p=0.001), with a superior CR rate (12% vs 1%). 37% of O+CHL subjects with an IRC-assessed CR were MRD negative. With a median follow-up of 29 months, median OS was not reached for O+CHL or CHL. Median duration of treatment for both arms was 6 cycles and 82% of patients received 6 or more cycles of O+CHL. Grade ≥3 AEs that occurred from start of treatment until 60 days after the last dose were experienced by 50% of patients receiving O-CHL and 43% of patients on CHL with the most common being neutropenia (O+CHL: 26%, CHL: 14%). Grade ≥3 infusion-related AEs were reported in 10% of patients. No fatal infusion reactions were reported. Grade ≥3 infections were reported in 15% (O+CHL) and 14% (CHL) of patients, with the most common infection being pneumonia (O+CHL: 4%, CHL: 3%). Deaths during treatment occurred in 2% of subjects in both arms. Conclusion Ofatumumab added to chlorambucil (O+CHL) demonstrated clinically important improvements with a manageable side effect profile in patients with CLL who have not received prior therapy and who are considered inappropriate for fludarabine based therapy. Disclosures: Hillmen: Roche Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: The use of ofatumumab in combination with chlorambucil in previously untreated CLL. The reported trial will support the extension of the ofatumumab licence. Robak:GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding. Janssens:GlaxoSmithKline: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Mayer:Glaxo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Panagiotidis:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kimby:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Teva: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Emergent: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Schuh:GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding. Montillo:Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. McKeown:GSK: Employment. Carey:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Gupta:GSK: Employment. Chang:GSK: Employment. Lisby:Genmab: Employment, hold stock options Other. Offner:Lilly: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Five-Year Follow-up of Safety and Efficacy of a Phase III Randomized Trial of Ofatumumab Therapy Versus Physicians' Choice in Patients with Bulky Fludarabine Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5569-5569
Author(s):  
Udvardy Miklos ◽  
Vladimir Strugov ◽  
Catharina Lewerin ◽  
Sebastian Grosicki ◽  
Grzegorz Mazur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Travel Expense

Abstract Background : In 2014, a planned interim analysis of an open-label, two-arm, randomized, phase III study of ofatumumab (OFA) vs physicians' choice (PC) treatment (most patients received rituximab-, alemtuzumab-, alkylator-, or fludarabine-based therapies) in patients with bulky fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (BFR CLL) was performed to assess the effectiveness of OFA in the time-period prior to administering small molecule kinase inhibitors. The study did not meet its primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by the independent review committee (median PFS 5.4 months vs 3.6 months; hazard ratio [HR]=0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50, 1.24; p=0.268). Here, we report the 5-year follow-up of the study. Methodology : Patients with BFR CLL who required therapy and had received at least 2 prior therapies were randomized (2:1) to receive either OFA or PC therapy. Eligible participants were stratified based on del (17p) status, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (0, 1, or 2), and fludarabine-refractory status (no response vs <6 months response).Patients in the OFA arm received an initial dose of 300 mg, followed 1 week (w) later with 2000 mg once weekly for 7 w, followed 4 w later by one infusion of 2000 mg every 4 w for 4 infusions, with total 12 infusions over 24 w. Patients in PC therapy received non-OFA regimen permitted therapies for CLL and standard of care regimens for up to 6 months. After 24 w in the OFA arm, if patients achieved at least stable disease or better, they were further randomized to either OFA extended arm (additional dose regimen of 2000 mg once every 4 w up to 24 w) or OFA observation arm (no further therapy). Patients in PC arm who received OFA after experiencing progressive disease (PD) had an option to receive single-agent OFA therapy in the salvage arm. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate improvement in PFS. The key secondary objectives were overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and evaluation of safety and tolerability of OFA. Results: After 24 w of OFA treatment, 122 patients who were randomized to PC (n=43) or OFA (n=79) underwent a second randomization (24 continued OFA in the extended arm and 13 stopped OFA in the observation arm). Of the 43 patients who were randomized to PC arm, 22 received OFA salvage therapy at PD. Patient disposition is described in Figure 1. Patients received a median of 6 and 3 treatment cycles in the OFA and PC arms, respectively. The interim analysis of PFS was presented earlier (Osterborg et al., 2016). The investigator-assessed ORR for the OFA and PC arms remained unchanged from the interim analysis (49% vs 37%, respectively). However, in the OFA salvage arm (55%), there was a 5% increase in the investigator-assessed ORR compared to that of the previous analysis. The median OS for the OFA arm vs PC arm was 19.2 months vs 14.5 months (HR=0.75, 95% CI: 0.48, 1.17; p=0.173, log-rank test). The most common adverse events (AEs) in the OFA and PC arms (>15% in either) were neutropenia (21% vs 19%), pneumonia (18% vs 19%), and anemia (9% vs 19%), respectively. Grade 3, 4, and 5 AEs (>10%) in the OFA and PC arms were neutropenia (17% vs 16%), pneumonia (14% vs 9%), febrile neutropenia (9% vs 12%), and anemia (6% vs 14%), respectively. Serious AEs (≥5%) in the OFA and PC arms were pneumonia (13% vs 16%), febrile neutropenia (9% each), pyrexia (5% vs 7%), anemia (3% vs 9%), sepsis (0% vs 9%), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (0% vs 5%), and neutropenic sepsis (1% vs 5%), respectively. There were 8 (10%) on-treatment deaths in the OFA arm and 5 (12%) on-treatment deaths in the PC arm. Post-treatment anti-cancer therapies are described in Table 1. Conclusions: At the 5-year follow-up of this phase III trial, there was a numerical but statistically not significant longer median OS (+4.7 months) in the OFA arm. As only few patients had the chance to receive a kinase inhibitor later, the study displays the survival of BFR CLL patients in the period prior to receiving small molecule inhibitors. This and other studies have demonstrated a longer PFS with the use of low-dose maintenance CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy vs not, a finding that may be re-explored in the new targeted therapeutic landscape in CLL. OFA is a safe option in multi-resistant advanced CLL cases. Disclosures Miklos: AOP Orphan: Honoraria; Novo nordisk: Honoraria. Strugov:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expense, Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Travel expense. Lewerin:Abbvie: Consultancy. Grosicki:Affimed: Research Funding. Steurer:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Montillo:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Middeke:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stefanelli:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vincent:Novartis: Employment. G:Novartis: Employment. Österborg:Beigene: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

scholarly journals BRUIN CLL-321: A Phase 3 Open-Label, Randomized Study of Pirtobrutinib Versus Investigator's Choice of Idelalisib Plus Rituximab or Bendamustine Plus Rituximab in BTK Inhibitor Pretreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (Trial in Progress)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3736-3736
Author(s):  
Jeff P. Sharman ◽  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
Catherine C. Coombs ◽  
Marisa Hill ◽  
Denise Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stock Options ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Prior Therapy

Abstract Background: Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) inhibitors (BTKi) have transformed the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), but these treatments are not curative and many patients will require additional treatment. Covalent BTKi share pharmacologic liabilities (e.g. low oral bioavailability, short half-life) that collectively may lead to suboptimal BTK target coverage especially in rapidly proliferating tumors with high BTK protein turnover such as accelerating CLL/SLL, ultimately manifesting as acquired resistance in some patients. To address these limitations, pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, non-covalent BTKi that inhibits both wild type (WT) and C481-mutated BTK with equal low nM potency was developed. In the phase 1/2 BRUIN study, pirtobrutinib achieved pharmacokinetic exposures that exceeded its BTK IC96 at trough, was well tolerated and demonstrated promising efficacy in CLL/SLL patients regardless of prior therapy, number of prior lines of therapy, or BTK C481 mutation status (Mato et al. Lancet 2021;397,10277:892-901). The purpose of this randomized phase 3 study is to demonstrate the superiority of continued BTK pathway inhibition with pirtobrutinib compared to other available therapies in patients with BTKi-treated CLL/SLL. Study Design and Methods: BRUIN CLL-321 is a randomized, open-label, global phase 3 study comparing pirtobrutinib monotherapy versus investigator's choice of idelalisib plus rituximab or bendamustine plus rituximab in patients with CLL/SLL who have been treated with a prior covalent BTKi. Prior therapy with venetoclax is permitted. Approximately 250 patients will be randomized 1:1. Randomization will be stratified by 17p deletion (yes/no) and prior venetoclax (yes/no). Patients receiving investigator's choice are eligible to crossover to pirtobrutinib monotherapy if they experience progressive disease per iwCLL 2018 (determined by IRC). Eligible patients are adults aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of CLL/SLL who require therapy per iwCLL 2018 criteria and who have received prior covalent BTKi. Unlimited number of lines of prior therapy are allowed. Key exclusion criteria include CNS involvement by CLL/SLL, Richter transformation any time pre-enrollment, a major bleeding event on prior covalent BTKi and history of allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) or autologous SCT or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy within 60 days of randomization. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) per iwCLL assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), safety and tolerability, and patient reported outcomes. The global study is currently enrolling patients (NCT04666038). Disclosures Sharman: BeiGene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy; Centessa: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy. Jurczak: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Celtrion, Celgene, Debbiopharm, Epizyme, Incyte, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Merck, Mei Pharma, Morphosys, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca, BeiGene, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Sandoz, Roche,: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Coombs: LOXO: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; MEI Pharma: Honoraria. Hill: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment. Wang: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment. Ku: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Guntur: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shahda: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Leow: Loxo Oncology at Lilly: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Ghia: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene/Juno/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; ArQule/MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Research Funding. Mato: Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nurix: Research Funding; MSKCC: Current Employment; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Genmab: Research Funding; LOXO: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: DSMB, Research Funding; DTRM BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Longer Term Follow up of the  Randomized Phase III Trial SWOG S0777: Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Vs. Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients (Pts) with Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma without an Intent for Immediate Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1992-1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian GM Durie ◽  
Antje Hoering ◽  
Rachael Sexton ◽  
Muneer H. Abidi ◽  
Joshua Epstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Iii Trial

Abstract Background: SWOG S0777, a randomized phase III trial, compared bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) using a pre-specified one-sided stratified log rank test at a significance level of 0.02. The stratification factors were International Staging System (ISS) stage (I, II or III) and intent to transplant (yes or no), among a total of 6 strata. Overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary end points. Results of the primary analysis of this trial were published in Lancet (2016, Volume 389, Issue 10068, 519 - 527). Methods: This updated analysis includes 460 patients evaluable for survival endpoints: 225 eligible and analyzable patients were randomized to Rd and 235 patients to VRd. Rd patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-21 and dexamethasone 40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. VRd patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-14 and dexamethasone 20/mg/day on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV push on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. All patients received aspirin 325 mg/day and VRd patients received VZV prophylaxis per institutional standard. The 6-month induction was six 28-day cycles of Rd and eight 21-day cycles of VRd followed by Rd maintenance for all patients until progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Results: Between 2008 and 2012, 525 patients from 48 institutions were randomized. Patient data have been rigorously updated for this analysis based upon a May 15, 2018 datalock. The median follow up is now 84 months (7 years). The median PFS is 41 months for VRd and 29 months for Rd: stratified hazard ratio (96% Wald Confidence Interval) was 0.742 (0.594, 0.928) and one-sided stratified log-rank P-value 0.003 (see Figure 1). The median OS for VRd is still not reached with median OS for Rd being 69 months: stratified hazard ratio (96% Wald Confidence Interval) was 0.709 (0.543, 0.926) and stratified two-sided P-value was 0.0114 (see Figure 2). The impact of age was assessed in several ways including using 3 cutoffs (<65 years; 65-75 years; >75 years) and multivariate cox proportional hazards regression analyses adjusted for age. As in prior analyses, both PFS and OS were improved with VRd versus Rd adjusting for age (P-values: 0.013 [PFS]; 0.033 [OS])). Depth of response was assessed incorporating new serial data and additional bone marrow results. The CR plus VGPR was 74.9% for VRd versus CR plus VGPR of 53.7% for Rd (P-value 0.006 for response differences using a stratified Cochran-Mantel- Haenszel analysis). The median duration of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone maintenance was 17.4 months. The number of second cancers was 19/235 (8%) with VRd and 16/225 (7%) with Rd. Conclusion: The addition of bortezomib to lenalidomide dexamethasone for induction therapy in previously untreated myeloma results in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS as well as better OS with follow up of 7 years. VRd had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and continues to represent an appropriate standard of care irrespective of age. Disclosures Durie: Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy. Abidi:Millenium Takeda: Research Funding. Epstein:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Dispenzieri:Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Reu:Bristol Myers Squibb: Employment; Millenium Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Orlowski:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BioTheryX, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Barlogie:Dana Farber Cancer Institute: Other: travel stipend; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Other: travel stipend; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Other: travel stipend; European School of Haematology- International Conference on Multiple Myeloma: Other: travel stipend; Myeloma Health, LLC: Patents & Royalties: : Co-inventor of patents and patent applications related to use of GEP in cancer medicine licensed to Myeloma Health, LLC; ComtecMed- World Congress on Controversies in Hematology: Other: travel stipend; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding.

NCRN CLL207 Study of Alemtuzumab Consolidation In CLL: Final Response Assessment and Early Follow-up (on Behalf of the NCRI CLL Trials Sub-Group)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 60-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abraham M Varghese ◽  
Dena Cohen ◽  
Christopher F.E. Pocock ◽  
Andy Rawstron ◽  
Walter M Gregory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Close Monitoring ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Time Point

Abstract Abstract 60 Background: The length of remission in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is dependent on the level of minimal residual disease (MRD) at the end of therapy, regardless of the therapy received. The conversion of remissions from MRD positive to negative should prolong remissions and survival. Several small studies have used alemtuzumab as consolidation therapy following conventional chemotherapy but with concerns over toxicity; primarily due to immune suppression and infections. The dose and timing (i.e. interval between prior chemotherapy and alemtuzumab) seem to be critical. Trial Design: The Phase II NCRN CLL207 Trial assessed alemtuzumab consolidation post-chemotherapy. Between 6 and 24 months from completing treatment (1 to 3 prior therapies) blood was screened for MRD using multi-parameter flow cytometry with a sensitivity of less than a single CLL cell in 10,000 leucocytes (0.01%). The marrow of MRD positive patients was assessed to quantify the CLL before treatment with alemtuzumab at a dose of 30mg given subcutaneously 3 times a week for 6 weeks, at which time the marrow was repeated. MRD negative patients and non-responders stopped therapy; MRD positive patients with at least one log reduction in MRD continued therapy for a further 6 weeks. All patients received prophylaxis with co-trimoxazole and aciclovir as well as weekly cytomegalovirus (CMV) monitoring by PCR. It was pre-determined that at least 14 of up to 54 (26%) patients would need to be converted from MRD positivity to negativity to justify further studies of this treatment strategy. Results: 47 patients received alemtuzumab in NCRN CLL207 with median age of 58 yrs (40-77) and 35 (74.5%) males. There was a median of 2 prior therapies (range 1 to 4) with 46 pts receiving fludarabine combinations as the latest therapy and 9 receiving rituximab-containing combinations. There were a total of 21 SAE's in 17 (36.2%) pts with 2 (4.3%) treatment related deaths (EBV-LPD and a parainfluenza infection). Alemtuzumab was stopped in 6 patients before week 6 mainly due to toxicity, 32 patients received 6–8 weeks of treatment and 9 patients received a 12-week course. G-CSF was given when the neutrophil count fell below 1 × 10^9/l and 14 (30%) patients required G-CSF during alemtuzumab with an additional 13 (28%) receiving G-CSF after completion of alemtuzumab. Positive CMV PCRs were detected in 21 (45%) patients, all of whom were successfully treated with pre-emptive antiviral therapy. Prior to alemtuzumab 24 patients were in complete remission (CR) and 23 were in partial remission (PR). Three months after alemtuzumab 13/23 (56%) PR converted to CR. 39/47 (83%) patients had MRD negative marrows at the end of alemtuzumab, 7 (15%) remained MRD positive and 1 (2%) was not evaluable. Blood MRD assessment 6 months after completing alemtuzumab showed that 15/31 (48%) MRD negative patients became MRD positive, although all except 2 had low CLL levels (below 0.1×10^9/l) at this time-point. Therefore overall 16/39 (41%) patients were MRD negative 6 months after completing alemtuzumab and of these 8/9 (89%) remained MRD negative in the blood at 12 months. Therefore MRD negativity in the blood at 6 months seems to better predict for persistent MRD negativity than the marrow at the end of therapy and appears to be the most appropriate assessment for the outcome of consolidation. Patients who are MRD negative at this time-point usually have durable remissions. 6 of the 9 patients receiving 12 weeks of alemtuzumab were MRD negative at the end of treatment but only 1 (11%) remained MRD negative in the blood at 6 months. In contrast 33/38 patients receiving up to 8 weeks of alemtuzumab were MRD negative at the end of treatment and 15 (39%) remained MRD negative at 6 months suggesting that the patients who benefit most from alemtuzumab consolidation are those who are MRD negative at 6 weeks. Conclusion: Alemtuzumab consolidation results in the eradication of detectable MRD in 83% of patients and 41% remain MRD negative 6 months later. Consolidation with alemtuzumab is associated with mainly infective toxicities, which are largely manageable with prophylaxis and close monitoring. These results justify the continued investigation of this approach in CLL within a clinical trial setting and with appropriate monitoring of patients. To this end we are now commencing a randomized Phase III trial of consolidation with alemtuzumab compared to observation (the CLARET study). Disclosures: Pocock: F.Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rawstron:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BD Bioscience: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Genzyme: Honoraria. Dearden:Roche Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hillmen:Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo Smith Kline: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Efficacy, Hematologic Effects, and Dose of Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients with Low Starting Platelet Counts (50–100 × 109/L): A Comparison to Patients with Normal or High Starting Platelet Counts

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 176-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moshe Talpaz ◽  
Ronald Paquette ◽  
Lawrence Afrin ◽  
Solomon Hamburg ◽  
Katarzyna Jamieson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Abstract 176 Background: Ruxolitinib (RUX) has demonstrated clinical benefit for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) with or without the JAK2V617F mutation at starting doses of 15 or 20 mg PO BID by alleviating symptoms, improving quality of life measures, reducing spleen volume and exhibiting an apparent increase in overall survival in the phase III placebo (PBO)-controlled COMFORT-I study. Reversible declines in platelet count and hemoglobin (Hgb) can occur with ruxolitinib but are rarely treatment-limiting. Patients with MF who have low platelet counts represent an important subset of MF patients; given the potential risk of bleeding complications, a dosing strategy for such patients is needed. We assessed an alternative strategy using lower starting doses of ruxolitinib with subsequent dose escalation in patients with MF who have platelet counts of 50–100 × 109/L (Study INCB018424-258; NCT01348490). Methods: RUX dosing started at 5 mg BID. With adequate platelet count, doses could increase by 5 mg once daily every 4 weeks to 10 mg BID. Further increases required evidence of suboptimal efficacy. Assessments include measurement of MF symptoms (MF Symptom Assessment Form v2.0 Total Symptom Score [TSS]); Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC); EORTC QLQ-C30, measurement of spleen volume by MRI, and safety/tolerability. Results: A total of 50 patients have enrolled, with data available for 41 patients. Nineteen have completed 24 weeks of treatment; >70% of these patients attained a final dose of ≥10 mg BID of RUX. Treatment was generally well tolerated in this study population with no withdrawals for thrombocytopenia or bleeding events. Based on analysis of adverse events, no new safety signals were observed in this population of MF patients with low platelet counts. Data for efficacy parameters, including spleen volume reduction, TSS reduction, and improvement in EORTC-QLQ-C30 subscales and PGIC were consistent with RUX treatment in the COMFORT-I study, and demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy compared with the COMFORT-I PBO arm (Table). Of 19 patients with platelet count data through Week 24, 5 showed increased platelet count over the duration of the study (range of increase: 20 to 95 x109/L); all 5 patients had optimized dosing to ≥10 mg BID. Compared with the 14 patients showing smaller increases or modest decreases in platelet count, these 5 patients were younger (mean age: 63 years vs. 71 years), had been diagnosed with MF more recently (2.2 years vs. 5.2 years) and had lower DIPSS scores (60% Intermediate-1; 20% Intermediate-2; 20% High vs. 0% Intermediate-1; 79% Intermediate-2; 21% High). Four patients (9.8%) reported adverse events of bleeding (excluding events related to bruising) of any grade (all events were Grade 1 except one Grade 2 hematochezia), consistent with previously reported hemorrhage frequency in the COMFORT-I study (16.8%, RUX; 12.6%, PBO). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that a dosing strategy of a low starting dose of RUX with escalation to 10 mg BID may be appropriate in MF patients who have low platelet counts. Most patients were able to titrate to a dose of ≥10 mg BID of RUX, a dose showing efficacy for both spleen volume and patient-reported outcomes generally consistent with previously reported data from Phase III trials. An increase in platelet counts was observed in approximately one-fourth of patients who completed 24 weeks of RUX treatment. Escalation to, and subsequent maintenance of, a 10 mg BID dose of RUX also preserves both Hgb and platelet count which may be beneficial for MF patients with anemia or thrombocytopenia. Disclosures: Talpaz: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Paquette:Incyte: Consultancy. Jamieson:Sunesis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Blue Distinction Centers for Transplants BlueCross BlueShield Association: Consultancy. Lyons:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Tiu:Incyte: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Winton:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria. Odenike:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Peng:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sandor:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. O'Neill:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Erickson-Viitanen:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leopold:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Levy:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Incyte Corporation: grant support Other. Verstovsek:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document