Associations Between Improvements in Myelofibrosis (MF) Symptoms and Quality of Life Measures with Splenomegaly Reduction in COMFORT-I: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of the JAK1 and JAK2 Inhibitor Ruxolitinib Versus Placebo in Patients with MF,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3842-3842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruben A. Mesa ◽  
Jason Gotlib ◽  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
John Catalano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Jak2 Inhibitor ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Abstract 3842 Background: Dysregulated JAK-STAT signaling is a key feature in MF, which is characterized by splenomegaly, debilitating symptoms, poor quality of life (QoL), cytopenias, and shortened survival. Ruxolitinib is a selective JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor with clinical activity in MF. COMFORT-I is a Phase III, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of ruxolitinib in patients with MF. At wk 24, 41.9% of patients receiving ruxolitinib reached the protocol-defined threshold of a ≥35% reduction in spleen volume (SV) compared to 0.7% in the placebo group (p<0.0001). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the relationship between SV reduction achieved with ruxolitinib treatment and changes in symptoms and QoL. Methods: 309 patients were randomized to receive ruxolitinib (n=155) or placebo (n=154). Initial dosing was based on baseline platelet counts: 15 mg BID for counts of 100–200 x109/L and 20 mg BID for >200 x109/L. SV was measured by blinded imaging (MRI or CT scan) every 12 wks. Via electronic diary, patients reported MF symptoms daily using the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) v2.0. The Total Symptom Score (TSS) from the MFSAF represents a combined score for the individual symptoms of abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left side, early satiety, itching, night sweats, and bone/muscle pain. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMISE) Fatigue questionnaires were administered at each visit; Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) was administered at every visit beginning at wk 4. The PGIC rates a patient's overall sense of whether a treatment has been beneficial or not on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 = very much improved to 7 = very much worse, with 4 = no change. Results: Baseline QoL scores reflected debilitating disease, and were similar to scores for similar-aged patients with other cancers (Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 Reference Values Manual, July 2008). The impact on patients was particularly evident on the PROMIS Fatigue scale and QLC-C30 Global Health, Physical Functioning, Role Functioning, and Social Functioning subscales. Baseline Symptom and QoL Measures* Associations between changes in symptoms and QoL with the objectively measured changes in SV were evaluated. Patients receiving ruxolitinib were grouped according to SV reduction at 24 wks of treatment: ≥35% reduction in SV (n=65), 10-<35% (n=51), and <10% (n=23). Symptom and QoL responses were evaluated among the various subgroups (of the SV reduction percentage strata) and comparisons were made across these and the total placebo group (n=106). Shown in the Figure are mean changes at wk 24 relative to baseline for TSS, QoL indicators, and PGIC scores. Conclusions: Changes in SV as low as 10% in ruxolitinib-treated patients were associated with improvements on EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health subscale, PROMISE Fatigue scale, and the MFSAF v2.0 diary TSS. Moreover, commensurate improvements in these outcomes were observed as the SV reduction increased. Importantly, the simple PGIC questionnaire allowed patients to characterize a meaningful change in their condition that was consistent with more comprehensive measures of MF symptoms and quality of life, reflecting a doctor-patient assessment easily applied to clinical practice. Disclosures: Mesa: Incyte: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; SBio: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Gotlib:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding. Gupta:Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Catalano:Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Deininger:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Shields:Incyte: Consultancy. Miller:Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Winton:Incyte: Consultancy. Hare:Incyte: Employment. Erickson-Viitanen:Incyte: Employment. Sun:Incyte: Employment. Sandor:Incyte: Employment. Levy:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Verstovsek:Incyte: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Ring Sideroblasts Treated with Luspatercept in the Medalist Study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 10-12
Author(s):  
Esther Natalie Oliva ◽  
Uwe Platzbecker ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Ghulam J. Mufti ◽  
Valeria Santini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Introduction: Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) experience severe anemia, which is commonly managed with frequent red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) in patients refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. At diagnosis, 85% of patients have anemia and 30-50% depend on RBCT. The administration of RBCT itself provides transient relief in anemia-related symptoms. Per protocol, MEDALIST investigators were advised to transfuse for symptoms related to anemia at the investigators' discretion. Hence, cessation or reduction of RBCT may increase anemia-related symptoms and negatively impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Luspatercept is a first-in-class erythroid maturation agent providing clinically meaningful reduction in transfusion burden in patients with transfusion-dependent anemia due to Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R)-defined Very low-, Low-, or Intermediate-risk MDS with ring sideroblasts in the phase 3 MEDALIST trial (NCT02631070). However, the impact of luspatercept on patients' HRQoL has not been evaluated. This analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of luspatercept versus placebo on HRQoL of patients treated for MDS from baseline through Week 25 of the MEDALIST study. Methods: Patients received luspatercept or placebo every 3 weeks for 24 weeks, plus best supportive care (BSC), including tailored amounts of RBCT. Effects of luspatercept versus placebo on HRQoL were evaluated as secondary and exploratory endpoints in the MEDALIST study. In the primary analysis, mean change from baseline to Week 25 (clinical assessment visit) in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's core quality of life questionnaire, version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and in the QoL assessment in MDS questionnaire (QOL-E) was determined using mixed-effects repeated measures analysis. Clinically meaningful change within each treatment arm was defined as a ≥ 10-point change in patient-reported outcome (PRO) score from baseline for all EORTC QLQ-C30 domains, and ≥ 0.5 standard deviation of the baseline domain score for all QOL-E domains. Differences between luspatercept and placebo were considered clinically meaningful if the change from baseline between treatment arms exceeded the threshold for a clinically meaningful difference. In an exploratory analysis, patient-reported impact of transfusion dependence and overall side effects on their daily life was estimated using the QOL-E instrument. Results: A total of 229 patients were randomized; 153 patients to luspatercept and 76 to placebo. The HRQoL-evaluable population, consisting of patients with ≥ 1 post-baseline HRQoL score, was 149 patients in the luspatercept arm and 76 patients in the placebo arm. Questionnaire compliance rates among patients remaining on treatment were similar between luspatercept and placebo treatment groups at Week 25 (EORTC QLQ-C30, 88.2% vs 79.4% and QOL-E, 72.5% vs 69.7%). At baseline, MEDALIST patients had a clinically meaningfully worse HRQoL compared with the general population in 5 of 15 EORTC QLQ-C30 domains: physical functioning, role functioning, social functioning, fatigue, and dyspnea. Through Week 25, there was no clinically meaningful difference in change from baseline between and within the luspatercept and placebo arms across all EORTC QLQ-C30 (Global health status shown in Figure A) and QOL-E domains. A greater proportion of patients in the luspatercept arm relative to placebo reported improvements in daily life from the impact of transfusion burden (Figure B). Relative to baseline, the proportion of patients reporting a lower impact of transfusion dependence on their daily life was 39% versus 22% in luspatercept versus placebo at Week 25; in contrast, the proportion of patients reporting a higher impact of transfusion dependence on their daily life was 12% versus 22% in luspatercept versus placebo. Impact of treatment side effects on patients was comparable between luspatercept and placebo. Conclusions: Luspatercept with BSC reduced RBCT burden and patient-reported transfusion impact on their daily life, while maintaining other aspects of HRQoL from baseline through Week 25 in the MEDALIST study. Disclosures Oliva: Alexion: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy. Platzbecker:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Garcia-Manero:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Helsinn Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Acceleron Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amphivena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; H3 Biomedicine: Research Funding. Mufti:BMS, Novartis: Research Funding; Abbvie, Novartis: Consultancy. Santini:Takeda, Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Research Funding; Acceleron, BMS, Menarini, Novartis: Consultancy; BMS, J&J, Novartis: Honoraria. Sekeres:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda/Millenium: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Komrokji:BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acceleron: Honoraria; Geron: Honoraria; Agios: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria; JAZZ: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Shetty:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tang:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Guo:BMS: Consultancy. Zhang:BMS: Current Employment. Ha:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Ito:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lord-Bessen:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Backstrom:BMS: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Acceleron Pharma: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Fenaux:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals The Relationship between Minimal Residual Disease and Patient Reported Outcomes in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3273-3273
Author(s):  
Hervé Avet-Loiseau ◽  
Jianming He ◽  
Katharine S. Gries ◽  
Huiling Pei ◽  
Sourish Saha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Index Value ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Objective With the introduction of novel treatments for multiple myeloma, patients are now achieving deeper and sustainable clinical responses. Recent studies have demonstrated that achieving Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativity leads to better progression-free survival and overall survival outcomes (Lahuerta JJ, et al. J Clin Oncol 2017. 35[25]:2900-10; Munshi NC, et al. JAMA Oncol 2016. 3[1]:28-35; Landgren O, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant 2016. 51[12]:1565-1568). However, the relationship between MRD status and patient reported outcomes (PRO) has not been reported. The objective of this analysis is to evaluate whether PRO endpoints change by MRD status using data from two randomized clinical trials of daratumumab containing treatment regimens, POLLUX (Dimopoulos MA, et al. N Engl J Med 2016. 375[14]:1319-1331) and CASTOR (Palumbo A, et al. N Engl J Med 2016. 375[8]:754-766), for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods MRD status was assessed in POLLUX at the time of suspected CR, and at 3 and 6 months post-suspected CR for responders. Similarly, in CASTOR, MRD status was assessed for patients at the time of suspected CR and at 6 months and 12 months after first dose. MRD was assessed via next generation sequencing using the clonoSEQ® assay V2.0 (Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA) at sensitivities of 0.001%. The PRO instruments (EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L) were collected in both POLLUX and CASTOR study prior to treatment, during the treatment phase, and post-progression. EQ-5D-5L assessed general health status and included an index value and visual analog scale (VAS) score. EORTC QLQ C30 assessed health related quality of life and included five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, social and cognitive), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea & vomiting and pain) and a global health status (GHS) scale as well as six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Summary statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, min and max) by MRD status (baseline, prior to MRD negativity, MRD negativity prior to progression) were reported and for subjects who did not achieve MRD negativity (baseline, post baseline prior to progression) on a pooled sample of subjects from the two clinical trials. To interpret a meaningful change, a 5-point threshold was defined based on the EORTC guidelines for assessing quality of life in clinical trials. Results Overall 137 subjects in both CASTOR and POLLUX achieved MRD negativity and had PRO data available for analysis. At baseline, GHS, EQ-5D-5L VAS and index value were 62.1, 66.7, and 0.72 respectively (GHS and VAS scores closer to 100, and index value closer to 1.0 represent better health state). Mean values increased to 67.2, 70.9, and 0.75 after achieving MRD negativity. Pain scale (symptom scores closer to 0 represent less symptoms) reduced from 30.4 to 23.5 and fatigue was similar (33.8 at baseline to 31.2) when patients achieved MRD negativity. However, when we compared the five functional scales prior to and post MRD negativity, no evident differences were identified. The mean change from baseline to post-MRD-negativity in the EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS and Pain scores exceeded a 5-point threshold, reflecting a meaningful change in subject's health-related quality of life. A total of 893 subjects in the pooled data set did not achieve MRD negativity and had PRO data available for analysis (EQ-5D-5L data were not available for 3 subjects). Baseline values for these MRD positive subjects were 60.0, 65.3, and 0.71 and the mean post-baseline (pre-progression) values remained similar at 61.1, 66.0, and 0.71 for GHS, VAS, and the index value, respectively. Pain reduced from mean 33.3 to 29.4 and fatigue was similar, changing from 36.2 to 37.6. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first analysis exploring the relationship between MRD status and PRO endpoints. Results from this analysis demonstrate that patients who achieve MRD negativity status show a trend in better health-related quality of life, with meaningful improvement in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS and pain scores. These preliminary findings indicate that overall health-related quality of life and symptom domains of EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-5L might be sensitive to changes in MRD status, with changes in GHS and Pain exceeding meaningful threshold for subjects. Disclosures Avet-Loiseau: Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. He:Janssen global services: Employment. Gries:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment. Pei:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment. Saha:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment. Chiu:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment. Cote:Janssen Research & Development, LLC: Employment. Lam:Janssen Global Services, LLC: Employment.

scholarly journals Venetoclax Improves Quality of Life for Patients with Elapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4858-4858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Cochrane ◽  
Tatiana Chagorova ◽  
Tadeusz Robak ◽  
Su-Peng Yeh ◽  
Evgeny Nikitin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
The Impact

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have significantly decreased health related quality of life (HRQoL), particularly related to severe and progressive fatigue. Side effects of chemotherapies and the emotional burden of living with an often poor prognosis disease also negatively impact patient HRQoL. Venetoclax, an oral agent that targets the anti-apoptotic protein BCL2, has demonstrated high rates of deep and durable response in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL, including those with 17p deletions, and has been shown to facilitate clinically relevant improvement in several key aspects of functioning and HRQoL. We evaluated the impact of venetoclax monotherapy on the quality of life of patients with R/R CLL. METHODS: VENICE II is an ongoing open-label, phase 3b, multicenter study (NCT02980731) that assessed patient-reported HRQoL in patients who were ≥18 years old with R/R CLL, including those with 17p deletion, TP53 mutations, and/or prior experience with B-cell receptor pathway inhibitor-containing (BCRi) therapy, treated with venetoclax monotherapy (5-week dose-titration, starting at 20mg once daily, then increased weekly to 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and 400 mg, followed by 400mg once daily). The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline to Week 48 in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) subscale. HRQoL subscales analyzed included: Global Health Status, Role Functioning, Emotional Functioning, Cognitive Functioning, Social Functioning, and Fatigue. The impact on QoL was also assessed on the CLL Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16). Relevance of mean changes in HRQoL measures from baseline were analyzed based on minimum important difference (MID); a 5-10 point change was defined as MID, and >10 points was considered clinically meaningful.(Osoba, D., et al. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:139-44. Osoba, D., et al. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:353-64.) Safety and adverse events (AEs) were also monitored. RESULTS: As of the data cutoff, April 30, 2018, the median time on study was 28 weeks (range: 1 - 73) and the median time on therapy was 23 weeks (range: 0.1 - 69) in this ongoing study. Of the 169 treated patients, 70% were male; the median age was 65 years (range: 24 - 86). Among those with available data, 17p deletions and TP53 mutations were confirmed in 34% (41/122) and 38% (19/50) of patients, respectively. Overall, 38%, 20%, and 42% of patients had one, two, and three (or more) prior lines of therapy respectively; 21% of patients had prior BCRi therapy. Clinically meaningful improvements from baseline were observed by week 12 and were sustained through week 48 in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 global health status and the role function, social function, and fatigue subscales (Table and Figure 1A) and EORTC-QLQ-CLL16 future health and disease effect subscales (Table and Figure 1B). Eighty-two percent of patients had at least 1 AE; most commonly observed AEs (≥10% of patients) were neutropenia (35%), diarrhea (17%), thrombocytopenia (15%), anemia (12%), nausea (12%), and upper respiratory infection (11%). Twenty-eight percent of patients had a serious AE, of which the most common were pneumonia (5%), febrile neutropenia (4%) and pyrexia (3%). Five percent of patients discontinued the study due to an AE. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary data from this ongoing study suggest that patients with R/R CLL experienced improvement in several key aspects of functioning and quality of life with venetoclax monotherapy within the first 12 weeks which is sustained over time. Venetoclax monotherapy was well tolerated in R/R CLL patients. These findings are consistent with previous studies of R/R CLL patients who received venetoclax monotherapy. Disclosures Cochrane: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Calgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria. Robak:AbbVie, Inc: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy. Yeh:GNT Biotech & Medicals Crop.: Research Funding. Nikitin:AbbVie, Inc: Speakers Bureau. Breuleux:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership; Gilead: Equity Ownership; Basilea: Patents & Royalties; Novartis: Patents & Royalties. Masud:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sail:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Komlosi:AbbVie, Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Anderson:Walter and Eliza Hall: Employment, Patents & Royalties; AbbVie, Inc: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

International Observational Study On Bortezomib (VELCADE) in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Preliminary Efficacy and Quality of Life (QoL) Results From the Belgian Population.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4523-4523
Author(s):  
Michel Delforge ◽  
Hadewijch De Samblanx ◽  
Hilde Demuynck ◽  
Greet Bries ◽  
Philippe Mineur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Financial Impact ◽  
Response Criteria ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Abstract 4523 Introduction Bortezomib (VELCADE) is a proteasome inhibitor for treatment of MM. The eVOBS (electronic VELCADE Observational Study) evaluates treatment and clinical outcome with bortezomib in daily practice in the relapsed setting. Enrollment in the study started in Oct 06 and is still continuing, with 3 y follow-up for every enrolled patient. This report concerns preliminary efficacy and Quality of Life (QoL) results of 136 Belgian patients included in the latest interim analysis from June 2009. Patients and Methods Adults were eligible for study if they were scheduled to initiate bortezomib within the approved indication. All bortezomib dosages and concomitant treatments were permitted, except investigational therapies. Due to the non-interventional nature of the study, no predefined response criteria were mandated; response criteria included M-protein, EBMT, SWOG, or others as defined by the investigator. QoL assessment was conducted in Belgium only, using the EORTC Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises a global health status (GHS) scale, five functional scales and six symptom scales. The questionnaire was administered at baseline and at the start of each treatment cycle. Evolution of mean scores was determined in correlation with baseline characteristics and response. Results were also analyzed for all patients and responders (partial response (PR) or better) vs. non-responders. For this, a mixed model was used comparable to that described by Lee et al. [BJH (2008) 143, 511-519], with missing data due to death being assigned the lowest possible score (model A) vs. being treated as missing (model B). Predictive value of baseline QoL scores for Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) was assessed. Results One hundred thirty six patients (57% male) are included in this analysis, with median age of 65y, and mean time since MM diagnosis of 2.9 years. Prior number of therapies received was 1 in 56%, 2 in 27%, and 3 or more in 11%. Five % received bortezomib in first line and for 1% data were missing. 97% of patients started bortezomib at 1.3 mg/m2 on the standard schedule. Median treatment duration was 5 cycles. Of the 97 patients that were evaluated for response so far, overall response rate was 69%, with 57% PR and 12% CR/nCR. 14% and 9% of patients reached MR and SD, respectively. 78% of all enrolled patients experienced AEs of any grade, which led to discontinuation of treatment in 30%, comparable with the 37% in the APEX trial (Richardson, NEJM 2005). For QOL assessment 103 patients completed the EORTC QLQ C-30 at baseline, with this number decreasing substantially in subsequent cycles (n=42 by cycle 4). Using model A (death = worst possible outcome), a small but significant decline in QoL was seen for physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, and for symptom scales of nausea and vomiting and financial impact. Of these, only the decline in cognitive functioning remained significant when applying model B (death = missing). In the APEX trial as well there was a decline in GHS as well as in 8 of the EORTC scale scores (Lee et al BJH 2008). No significant differences were seen according to baseline data (gender, age, line of therapy, lab values). Using model A, the evolution of QoL scores was significantly worse for non-responders vs. responders on the scales of physical, cognitive and emotional functioning, nausea and vomiting, sleep disturbance, diarrhea and financial impact. When using model B, no significant differences in QOL between responder and non-responder groups were detected. Worse baseline scores for nausea and vomiting and dyspnoea were predictive for worse PFS, but only dyspnoea was predictive for worse OS. Conclusion Overall in this study a slight decline was seen for some QoL parameters over the course of treatment, consistent with findings from the APEX trial (Lee et al. BJH 2008), which included patients similar to those in the eVOBS trial (Zervas IMW 2009). Using the model that assigns “worst possible outcomes” to data missing because of death, better QoL was seen in responders vs. non-responders, suggesting better QoL is at least partly linked to response. Interpretation should be done with caution due to the number of patients and the decreasing number of returned questionnaires over time. Disclosures: Delforge: Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Van Droogenbroeck:Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy. Kuijten-Celzo:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Diels:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Ganguly:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dhawan:Johnson and Johnson Research Pharmaceuticals: Employment.

Evaluation of Health Related Questionnaire Among Mycosis Fungoides and Lymphomatoid Papulosis

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5603-5603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakhshandra Talpur ◽  
Iris Wieser ◽  
Casey Wang ◽  
Lyons Genevieve ◽  
Madeleine Duvic
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Mycosis Fungoides ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Function Score ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Function

Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Mycosis Fungoides (MF) andlymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) are relatively rare and itchy skin disorders. The cosmetic disfigurement and severe pruritus dramatically affects the patient's quality of life. The focus is to examine the validity and reliability of the skindex-29, M.D. Anderson symptom inventory (MDASI) and itch-related quality of life (IQOL) questionnaire in 62 patients in a phase II trial of Brentuximab Vedotin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients completed survey questionnaires related to symptoms and quality-of-life several times over the course of Brentuximab Vedotin. We compared patients' baseline scores to their end-of-study (EOS) scores. Patients were grouped by diagnosis into Mycosis Fungoides and Lymphomatoid papulosis group. Questionnaires included skindex-29, focusing on the skin conditions the patient was bothered the most. (MDASI) for patients with cancer and following the symptoms of cancer and the itchy quality of life (I-QoL) questionnaire was developed to measure the symptoms associated with cancer therapeutic agents and their effect on daily activities. Scoring for the Skindex-29, M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and the Quality of Life (QOL) survey were done according to the questionnaire specific scoring guide. Responses were compared between 2 groups using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS Questionnaires from 62 patients (23 LyP and 39 MF) were studied at baseline and end of study. Patients were 33 males and 29 females with median age of 60 years (range: 27-86 years). The median overall survival (OS) was significant P = 0.041, when comparing patients with MF to LyP. The median survival time for patients from time of diagnosis with MF was 14.66 years and LyP was not reached. There was no significant difference in progression free survival (PFS) between MF and LyP. The median number of Brentuximab Vedotin cycles was 7 (1-19). Skindex-29 scales, showed change in emotion scale and function scale from baseline to EOS, both groups had a decrease, patients with LyP had a larger decrease in emotion score (P = 0.069) and function score (P =0.096) over the course of the study. There was no difference in the symptom scale from baseline to EOS. The patients with LyP had a larger decrease in function score from baseline to EOS. When comparing patients with MF to those with LyP for MDASI, there is no evidence of a difference, from baseline to EOS, in either symptom severity or symptom interference in daily life. In the IQOL when comparing the LyP patients' QOL responses from baseline to EOS, did not show significant difference. Table 1. Change in Skindex-29 scales, by group Skindex Scale MF LYP p-value Change from baseline to end-of-study: N Median Min Max N Median Min Max Emotion 35 -10 -65 35 20 -22.50 -61.94 12.5 0.0698 Symptoms 35 -7.14 -46.43 42.86 20 -10.71 -53.57 28.57 0.4782 Function 35 -2.08 -50.38 27.08 20 -16.29 -44.70 14.58 0.0962 Table 2. Change in MDASI scales, by Diagnosis MDASI Scale Item MF LYP p-value Change from baseline to end-of-study: N Median Mean Std. Dev Range N Median Mean Std. Dev Range Severity 35 0.23 0.18 1.96 (-5.85, 3.15) 21 0.38 0.46 1.61 (-1.69, 5.0) 0.9595 Interference 35 0.17 0.06 3.07 (-9.17, 5.17) 19 0.0 0.11 1.59 (-3.0, 4.67) 0.6764 CONCLUSIONS A significant improvement in emotions and functional part of skindex-29 was observed when comparing patients with MF to patients with LyP. While both groups had a decrease, the patients with LyP had a larger decrease in emotion and function score over the course of the study. Disclosures Duvic: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rhizen Pharma: Research Funding; Allos (spectrum): Research Funding; Therakos: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Soligenics: Research Funding; Huya Bioscience Int'l: Consultancy; Spatz Foundation: Research Funding; MiRagen Therapeutics: Consultancy; Eisai: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Consultancy; Cell Medica Ltd: Consultancy; Tetralogics SHAPE: Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Co: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Quality of Life With Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin and Fluorouracil Compared With Cisplatin and Fluorouracil From a Phase III Trial for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: The V-325 Study Group

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (22) ◽  
pp. 3210-3216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaffer A. Ajani ◽  
Vladimir M. Moiseyenko ◽  
Sergei Tjulandin ◽  
Alejandro Majlis ◽  
Manuel Constenla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Purpose Therapy of patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer should provide symptom relief and improve quality of life (QOL) because most patients are symptomatic at baseline. Using validated instruments, we prospectively assessed QOL (even after completion of protocol treatment) as one of the secondary end points of the V325 phase III trial. Patients and Methods Four hundred forty-five patients randomly received either docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 each on day 1 plus fluorouracil 750 mg/m2/d continuous infusion on days 1 to 5 every 3 weeks (DCF) or cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 plus fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2/d continuous infusion on days 1 to 5 every 4 weeks (CF). The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and, where available, the EuroQOL EQ-5D questionnaire were administered every 8 weeks from baseline until progression and then every 3 months. Time to definitive deterioration of QOL parameters was analyzed. Results The proportions of patients having assessable EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D questionnaires at baseline were 86.0% and 78.7% with DCF, respectively, and 89.7% and 92.8% with CF, respectively. Time to 5% deterioration of global health status (primary end point) significantly favored DCF over CF (log-rank test, P = .01). QOL was preserved longer for patients on DCF than those on CF for all time to deterioration analyses, demonstrating the statistical superiority of DCF compared with CF. Conclusion V325 represents the largest trial with the longest prospectively controlled evaluations of QOL during protocol chemotherapy and follow-up in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. In V325, advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer patients receiving DCF not only had statistically improved overall survival and time to tumor-progression, but they also had better preservation of QOL compared with patients receiving CF.

scholarly journals Assessment of Quality of Life in the NCRI Spirit 2 Study Comparing Imatinib with Dasatinib in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4024-4024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander M. Labeit ◽  
Mhairi Copland ◽  
Leanne M. Cork ◽  
Corinne A. Hedgley ◽  
Letizia Foroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Well Being ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background: Imatinib and dasatinib are established drugs in the first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Several studies, including SPIRIT2 have shown that first-line dasatinib (100mg once daily) has a superior complete cytogenetic and major molecular response rate compared to imatinib (400mg once daily), but no significant differences in progression-free or overall survival have been shown in any study. To date, there has been no direct comparison of quality of life (QoL) using generic and cancer-specific instruments for first-line treatment of chronic-phase CML with imatinib and dasatinib. SPIRIT2 (STI571 Prospective International Randomised Trial 2) is the first randomized clinical trial to incorporates generic and cancer-specific QoL measurement for first-line therapy. Methods: Quality of life is a secondary endpoint in the SPIRIT2 trial and has been assessed at baseline, and at 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months post trial entry and thereafter annually. The EQ-5D, FACT-G, FACT-BRM and the FACT-TOI have been used as QoL measures in this trial. The FACT-G covers cancer-specific QoL measure dimensions such as physical well-being, functional well-being, social and family well-being, emotional well-being and the FACT-BRM and the FACT-TOI different subsets of them. The QoL scores (EQ-5D, FACT-G, FACT-BRM, FACT-TOI) were calculated at different time points and comparison of the mean scores for both treatment groups was made. Results: A comparison between imatinib and dasatinib shows no significant difference in QoL in generic instruments and also in cancer-specific instruments. EQ-5D was 0.77 and 0.79 at baseline and 0.80 and 0.82 at one year for dasatinib and imatinib, respectively (2-3 basis points increase over 1 year). Similar results were obtained for the FACT-G, FACT-BRM and the FACT-TOI. There was a slight increase for the FACT-G (4-5 basis points), FACT-TOI (3-4 basis points) and FACT-BRM (8-10 basis points) after 1 year for both treatments, but this difference was not significant. The effects on the well-being and the emotional dimensions have been analysed for both drugs and there was no change over time, demonstrating results similar to the imatinib arm of the IRIS trial. Conclusions: Standard dose imatinib and dasatinib are both used as first-line treatments for CML and, despite different side effect profiles, there is no significant difference in QoL using the instruments described here between these two drugs over time. These data will allow the derivation of utility values to contribute to future health economic/technology appraisals. Additional analyses of how generic and cancer-specific measures of different QoL instruments change in CML patients over time in those patients that develop side effects, e.g. fluid retention with imatinib or pleural effusion with dasatinib will be presented. Disclosures Copland: Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cork:BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding. Hedgley:Ariad: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Gills:Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Holyoake:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bescoby:Roche: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Pocock:Janssen: Honoraria. Clark:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pzifer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. O'Brien:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pzifer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Quality of Life and Caregiver Burden in Patients and Their Caregivers Undergoing Outpatient Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Compared to Inpatient Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 62-62
Author(s):  
Vinita Dhir ◽  
Lara Zibdawi ◽  
Harminder K Paul ◽  
Osvaldo Espin-Garcia ◽  
Christine I Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Indirect Costs ◽  
Opportunity Costs ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lost Opportunity ◽  
Out Of Pocket Costs

Introduction Outpatient autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has become standard of care in many centres due to limited inpatient resources and rising financial constraints. Outpatient ASCT involves family members/friends assuming some patient care responsibilities during the acute transplant period. Although this may be associated with reduced direct medical costs, little work has been done to ascertain the "out of pocket costs" and "lost opportunity costs" to patients and their caregivers. Outpatient transplantation is perceived to provide superior quality of life (QOL) for patients, but there is little evidence to support this. In addition to patients' QOL, there is limited data on the impact of these treatments on caregivers' QOL. Thus, our objectives were to compare the QOL of patients and their caregivers undergoing outpatient and inpatient ASCT, and to quantify indirect costs to them. Methods This is a single centre cohort study of consecutive patients with lymphoma and plasma cell disorders undergoing ASCT at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from April 2016 - July 2019. Patients without a primary caregiver were still eligible to complete the QOL portion of the study. All patients completed four questionnaires: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT); FACT-Fatigue (FACT-F); EQ-5D-3L; and a distress impact thermometer. Clinically meaningful differences between the groups and serially were defined as ≥ 4 points on the FACT-BMT and FACT-F, and ≥0.08 on the EQ-5D-3L. Caregivers completed three questionnaires: Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Care (C-QOLC), a distress impact thermometer, and a caregiver self-administered financial expenditure survey (C-SAFE). Indirect costs were defined as lost opportunity costs (i.e., wages) and out-of-pocket costs (e.g., parking, accommodations). Questionnaires were completed at 5 time points: D0 (prior to ASCT), D+7, D+14 (discharge from daily visits), D+28 (discharge from ASCT) and D+100 (follow-up). Results In total, 68 patients have been enrolled to date (41 outpatients and 27 inpatients), and 54 caregivers (38 outpatients and 16 inpatients). Median patient age was 57 yrs (range: 18-71), and 66% were male. Of the 68 patients, 69% had a diagnosis of multiple myeloma and 31% lymphoma. Majority of caregivers were spouses (74%). In the overall sample, FACT-F scores (fatigue) increased significantly at D+7, D+14, and D+28, with improvement at D+100 (all p&lt;0.05 and clinically meaningful). Compared to inpatients, outpatients had higher fatigue levels at D+7 and D+14 that were statistically significant (Figure 1), with D+14 being clinically significant as well. For all patients, QOL scores by FACT-BMT declined at D+7, but then improved to above baseline values at D+100 (p&lt;0.05) (Table 1). On the EQ-5D-3L, patients' self-reported overall best imaginable health status decreased at D+7 and D+14 relative to baseline (p&lt;0.05); no significant difference was observed at D+28 and D+100 (Figure 1). Health utility scores were also calculated from the EQ-5D-3L. There were no significant trends in the overall sample, but when comparing the two groups, outpatients had lower measures at D+14 that were statistically and clinically relevant. With respect to caregiver QOL, in the entire sample, QOL was higher at D+100 relative to baseline (p&lt;0.05) (Figure 2). There were no differences between the two groups. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in lost opportunity costs (wages) between the two groups, however there was a trend towards higher lost opportunity costs in outpatient caregivers in the early ASCT process (D0, D+7, D+14). The mean overall costs (burden) for the primary caregiver in the acute first 100d phase of ASCT was C$4475. The indirect out-of-pocket costs by caregivers varied greatly, with an average of $58 at baseline (range $0-455) and $121 at D+28 (range $0-710). Conclusions There was significant deterioration of various QOL measures in all patients, irrespective of outpatient or inpatient status. Outpatients, however, reported significantly higher fatigue levels at D+7 and D+14. Caregiver QOL appears comparable between the two modalities, and appears to improve significantly by the follow-up period. The financial burden on caregivers, mostly driven by lost opportunity costs (wages), is high, with a trend towards higher burden in outpatient caregivers in the early parts of ASCT. Disclosures Chen: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Kridel:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Kuruvilla:Celgene: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Amgen: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy; Gilead: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria. Reece:Otsuka: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Tiedemann:Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Trudel:Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria. Prica:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

scholarly journals IPH4102; An Anti-KIR3DL2 Monoclonal Antibody in Refractory Sezary Syndrome: Results from a Multicenter Phase 1 Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 684-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martine Bagot ◽  
Pierluigi Porcu ◽  
Basem M. William ◽  
Maxime Battistella ◽  
Maarten Vermeer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Aims: Sezary Syndrome (SS) is the most aggressive form of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL), characterized with high blood involvement and expression of Killer cell immunoglobulin like receptor 3DL2 (KIR3DL2). IPH4102 is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody that targets KIR3DL2. Very limited effective treatment options are available for SS patients with refractory disease. We conducted a phase 1 study testing IPH4102 in patients with refractory CTCL. Here we report results from the SS subset. Methods: IPH4102-101 study is a multicenter phase I trial composed of a dose escalation and cohort expansion portions that evaluated IPH4102 in patients with refractory CTCL. Key eligibility criteria included failure of ≥ 2 prior systemic therapies. KIR3DL2 testing was performed for all patients at baseline and at different time points throughout the study. IPH4102 was given Q1w x 4 weeks, followed by Q2w x 10 weeks then Q4w until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint is safety. Main 2ry endpoints include best global response (BGR) using the Olsen criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), quality of life (QOL) and biomarker analyses. Results: The study included 35 SS patients, 20 in the dose escalation and 15 in the cohort expansion, with a median age of 70 years (37-90). Median time from initial SS diagnosis to starting IPH4012 was 22.8 months. Nineteen patients (54%) received IPH4102 as ≥ 4th line of systemic therapy and 7 (20%) were previously treated with mogamulizumab. Thirteen patients (37%) had lymph node involvement as per investigator assessment and based on radiological examination while 7 patients (20%) had evidence of large cell transformation. KIR3DL2 expression was observed in either skin or blood in 33 patients (94%) and in both in 28 patients (80%). Most common adverse events (AEs) were asthenia (26%), peripheral edema (26%), and fatigue (23%), which were all grade 1-2. Possibly related grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed in 7 patients (20%), and only 2 patients (6%) stopped treatment for an AE. Table 1 shows BGR and response by compartment. Overall response rate was 42.9% [95% CI: 28.0% - 59.1%], with median time to response of 4.8 months. Median DOR and PFS were 5.6 months [95% CI: 3.2-not reached] and 12.8 months [95% CI: 8.1-not reached], respectively. Mogamulizumab pretreated patients showed BGR, median DOR and PFS of 42.9%, 13.8 and 20.9 months, respectively. Quality of life assessment was performed using the Pruritus VAS score andSkinDex29. Patients with CR, PR or SD showed marked improvement overtime of all evaluated parameters including SkinDex29 global, symptoms, emotional, and functional scores. Biomarker analysis showed progressive decrease in CD4/CD8 ratio in responding patients. The decrease of KIR3DL2+ expressing cells in skin evaluated by immunohistochemistry at week 5 and 14 was able to predict BGR (AUC=0.749, 0.714, respectively). Figure 1 shows reduction in KIR3DL2 expressing cells at week 5 and week 14 in a patient who had PR as BGR. To date, 9 patients are still ongoing treatment. Updated clinical and correlative research analyses will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: IPH4102 is highly effective in patients with refractory SS. It induces meaningful clinical activity and improves quality of life placing it as an encouraging treatment option for these patients. Further development in SS and other T-cell malignancies is underway. Disclosures Bagot: Actelion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Porcu:Innate Pharma: Consultancy. Khodadoust:Innate Pharma: Research Funding. Sicard:Innate Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Azim:Innate Pharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kim:miRagen: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Galderma: Research Funding; Tetralogic: Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa-Kirin-Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Age and Gender-Related Pretreatment Quality of Life Profiles in Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Establishing Benchmark Data from an International Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2099-2099
Author(s):  
Fabio Efficace ◽  
Gianluca Gaidano ◽  
Massimo Breccia ◽  
Pasquale Niscola ◽  
Francesco Cottone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Age And Gender ◽  
Respective Control ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Background: Patients myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) diagnosed with higher-risk disease have poor prognosis thus making improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) a major goal of therapy. Understanding HRQOL profile of untreated patients is important to help clinicians to better target subpopulations in need of special attention from the very beginning of therapy. Aims: The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether HRQOL differences exist by age and gender in untreated patients with higher-risk MDS. A secondary objective is to provide age and gender pretreatment HRQOL profiles to be used as reference baseline data for comparing HRQOL of MDS patients under treatments. Methods: This analysis is based on 280 adult patients diagnosed with IPSS risk score of intermediate-2 (74%) and high-risk (26%), enrolled in an international prospective observational study. Median age of patients was 71 years (range 32-89), 176 were men (63%) and 104 (37%) women. HRQOL was assessed at study entry and before treatment for higher-risk disease (except for transfusions), with the EORTC QLQ-C30, the most widely used HRQOL outcome measure in MDS research. Thus, our data are likely to further ease interpretation of outcomes in many studies using this questionnaire. One hundred seventy-five patients had received at least one red blood cell transfusion at the time of baseline HRQOL assessment. HRQoL data of MDS patients were age-gender matched with those general population norms. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed ranks tests were used for unmatched and matched comparisons, respectively (α=0.05). Effect sizes were also computed. Results: No statistically significant differences existed in any of the HRQOL domain by IPSS category (intermediate-2 versus high-risk). However, HRQOL profiles differed by age and gender and results are reported in Table 1. Women generally reported lower HRQOL scores than men, with statistically significant impairments in the global quality of life (P=0.008), role (P=0.014), emotional (P=0.024) and social functioning (P=0.028). When compared to their peers in the general population, HRQOL was found to be impaired in all age group categories (Figure 1, A and B). However, the magnitude of impairments across HRQOL domains was markedly larger in younger patients (aged 30-59 years) compared to older age groups (≥60 years). The top three largest impairments in this younger group were found for: fatigue (ES=2.47, P<0.001), dyspnea (ES=2.14, P<0.001) and role functioning RP (ES=1.96, P<0.001). This latter aspect indicates the ability to perform daily activities. Conclusion: Pretreatment HROQL of higher-risk MDS patients vary by age and gender and current reference data will help making more accurate comparisons with HRQOL of patients under treatment. Clinicians should also pay special attention to younger patients, as these are those most in need of HRQOL improvements. Figure 1. Adjusted mean differences between MDS patients and their respective control groups by age categories (30-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years and over 80) in functional aspects and global quality of life. A score below 0 line means worse outcomes for MDS patients. *= Statistically significant (P<0.05) **= Statistically significant (P<0.001) Figure 1. Adjusted mean differences between MDS patients and their respective control groups by age categories (30-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years and over 80) in functional aspects and global quality of life. A score below 0 line means worse outcomes for MDS patients. / *= Statistically significant (P<0.05) **= Statistically significant (P<0.001) Figure 2. Adjusted mean differences between MDS patients and their respective control groups by age categories (30-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years and over 80) in symptom scales. A score above 0 line means worse outcomes for MDS patients. *=Statistically significant (P<0.05) **=Statistically significant (P<0.001) Figure 2. Adjusted mean differences between MDS patients and their respective control groups by age categories (30-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years and over 80) in symptom scales. A score above 0 line means worse outcomes for MDS patients. / *=Statistically significant (P<0.05) **=Statistically significant (P<0.001) Figure 3. Quality of life profile by the EORTC QLQ-C30 in higher risk-MDS patients by gender and age groups. Means scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30 are reported. Figure 3. Quality of life profile by the EORTC QLQ-C30 in higher risk-MDS patients by gender and age groups. Means scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30 are reported. Disclosures Gaidano: MorphoSys; Roche; Novartis; GlaxoSmithKline; Amgen; Janssen; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Other: Advisory boards; Celgene: Research Funding. Santini:celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Onconova: Honoraria, Research Funding. Platzbecker:Celgene: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen, Inc.: Honoraria. Di Renzo:Celgene: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document